Kikes kick-off WW III?

[yankeedoodle]

Looks like they shot down a Russian plane, with 14 crew on board.
Russian plane disappears from radars during Israeli attack on Syria's Latakia – MoD
https://www.rt.com/news/438673-russian-il20-disappears-radars/

A Russian military Il-20 aircraft with 14 service members on board went off the radars during an attack by four Israeli jets on Syria's Latakia province, the Russian Defense Ministry said.

Air traffic controllers at the Khmeimim Air Base "lost contact" with the aircraft on Wednesday evening, during the attack of Israeli F-16 fighters on Latakia, said the MOD.

[rmstock]

interesting. Today the Russian army held a press conference over new exculpatory evidence
in the MH17 crash :

Russian Defense Ministry Reveals New Details in MH17 Crash in Ukraine (VIDEO)
12:00 . 17.09.2018 . (updated 16:37 17.09.2018)
https://sputniknews.com/russia/201809171068089638-russia-boeing-mh-17/

Russian Defense Ministry Reveals New Details in MH17 Crash in Ukraine
by Sputnik , Published on Sep 17, 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqHzS9NqL4Y

In the presentation the Bellingcat video of the Russian BUK on the 12
ton military Truck traveling through the Donetsk area is completely
exposed as a fabrication. Bellingcat and the JIT investigation of the
British, Dutch and Australians now have some serious questions to
answer.


Serial number on engine and nozzle of the missile.
Serial numbers of missile that downed MH17 show it was produced in 1986, owned by Ukraine - Russia
Published time: 17 Sep, 2018 09:05  Edited time: 17 Sep, 2018 14:42
https://www.rt.com/news/438596-mh17-downing-russian-briefing/

[yankeedoodle]

interesting. Today the Russian army held a press conference over new exculpatory evidence
in the MH17 crash : 

Was watching RT earlier today, and they produced what they were intercepted radio communications, which included, to paraphrase, "we're going to do another Malaysian plane," being a clear reference to MH370, which disappeared prior to the shoot-down of MH17. 

First confirmation of a connection between both planes, which I've know from the beginning.

For weeks an anxious world was treated to regular reports about "pings" that resembled the "tick tick tick" of a bomb in so many suspense movies, until, yes, a Malaysian plane went BOOM, but, it wasn't MH370, but MH17, which was blamed on Russia.  Mysteriously, the "pings" disappeared, and nothing was heard of MH370,...
http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=23310.msg86814#msg86814 

More here:  http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?action=search2

[rmstock]

The Dutch conservative forum GS , GeenStijl at
https://www.geenstijl.nl/ who has been very closely documenting and
archiving all kinds of evidence, materials and developments in the MH17
case has been totally silent on this. That used to be totally
different. However as they are in part sponsored by the Telegraaf, they
sometimes need to follow 'orders'. In December last year the TMG Group,
who owns the Telegraaf was taken over by a Belgian media consortium ,
the "Belgische Mediahuis".

The Dutch Foreign office is likewise totally silent on this one.

i.e. check out https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Bellingcat+site%3Ageenstijl.nl&t=h_&ia=web

[yankeedoodle]

France attacks Syria, according to RT.
Russia detects missile launches from French frigate off Syria's coast in Mediterranean – MoD
https://www.rt.com/news/438676-french-frigate-mediterranean-missiles/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

Russian airspace control systems have registered missile launches from a French frigate in the Mediterranean on Monday, the Russian Defense Ministry reported.
The French Navy's newest frigate, FS Auvergne, fired rockets around 8pm GMT Monday, the Russian military said.

"Airspace control has recorded rocket launches from the French frigate Auvergne," the ministry's statement read. The Auvergne is deployed in the Mediterranean Sea, off the coast of Syria.

The launch was detected around the same time as four Israeli jets were carrying out missile strikes against targets in Syria's Latakia province, the MoD added.

[yankeedoodle]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H78dD5hlBgM

[rmstock]

you can not make this up , BB and CNN all agree :

https://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018/09/17/u-s-official-syria-accidentally-downed-russian-aircraft-with-personnel-on-board/

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/17/politics/syrian-regime-shoots-down-russian-plane/index.html

[yankeedoodle]

The American news media barely covered Israhell's agression, with only brief cover-Israhell's-ass reports that Syria "accidentally" shot down a Russian plane.

Syria accidentally shot down a Russian military plane
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/17/politics/syrian-regime-shoots-down-russian-plane/index.html

Russian Surveillance Plane Accidentally Shot Down By Syrian Forces, Moscow Says
https://www.npr.org/2018/09/18/649064034/russian-surveillance-plane-accidentally-shot-down-by-syrian-forces-moscow-says

Of course, we know the truth:  Israhell's fighter jets intentionally hid behind the Russian plane, knowing that the Russian plane would be hit by the Syrian air defense missiles.  In other words, the jews used the Russians as human shields - intentionally.

Russian Il-20 downed by Syrian missile after Israeli F-16s used it as cover during attack – MoD
https://www.rt.com/news/438686-syria-russia-s200-il20/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

'You are to blame for downing of Il-20 and death of its crew,' Russia tells Israel
https://www.rt.com/news/438690-russia-israel-il20-blame/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

Russia 'reserves right to respond' after saying Israel's actions led to downing of Il-20 by Syria
https://www.rt.com/news/438687-israel-russia-response-il20/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

Israhell orchestrated the shoot-down of the Russian plane intentionally, to provoke Russia into a response, just as a US aircraft carrier approaches Syria.

Russia will protect its servicemen, Israeli actions are 'reckless' – Foreign Ministry
https://www.rt.com/newsline/438766-plane-downing-israel-reckless/

US aircraft carrier Truman crosses Atlantic after threats to Syria
https://www.rt.com/usa/438740-uss-harry-truman-crosses-atlantic/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

We are less than 2 weeks away from October, so Israhell must do something to try to save their puppet in the White House, shabbos goy Donnie-boy.  And, the way to do that is with an October Surprise.  A war, maybe?  Caused by a false-flag blamed on the now-angry Russia, perhaps?

Phil Giraldi sees it coming:
Target Syria
Will a new war be the October Surprise?
http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/target-syria/

[yankeedoodle]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGGrLsxPRBQ

[yankeedoodle]

This SCREAMING headline just popped up on Sky News, out of Britain.  Ostensibly, it is about a long-running case of a British woman detained in Iran; but, with the building crisis in the Middle-East, it must be considered possible that this "warning" is an indicator of an upcoming WAR.

https://news.sky.com/story/warning-for-dual-national-britons-travelling-to-iran-11502396

Warning for dual-national Britons travelling to Iran

16:19, UK, Wednesday 19 September 2018

Breaking news


The UK Foreign Office made the announcement on Wednesday

British-Iranian dual nationals have been warned by the UK Foreign Office against all but essential travel to Iran.

A spokesperson said Britain's ability to provide support to detained dual nationals in Iran was "extremely limited" as the country does not recognise their status.

It comes as the British-Iranian mother Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe is detained in Tehran, convicted of spying.

She denies the charges, and human rights groups have called for her release.

More follows...

[yankeedoodle]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goQPZE53uqw

[yankeedoodle]

Well, if you want to kick-off a war, it helps if you've kicked-out the "adults in the room" who might try to stop it from happening.  According to this, shit-for-brains shabbos goy Donnie-boy is driving out Mattis, for the benefit of war for Israhell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4Aym166uDE

[yankeedoodle]

Ultimately, the kikes are behind this: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=80&v=3eYXdNyowJU

Up to 24 killed, 50+ injured during attack on military parade in Iran – state media (PHOTO, VIDEO) 
https://www.rt.com/news/439106-iran-parade-casualties-militants/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

An army parade in the southwestern Iranian city of Ahvaz has come under attack. Journalists and children are among those shot in an assault that has reportedly left over 20 people dead and more than 50 injured.

Gunmen opened fire from behind the stands during a military parade in Ahvaz on Saturday. The event was attended by members of the local elite, including the Ahvaz governor as well as high-ranking clerics and MPs. Shooting broke out several minutes into the event, which featured troops from the Iranian Army's 92nd armored division.

The attack has left as many as 24 people dead, Iran's official IRNA news agency reported. Some 53 people were wounded, including women and children. Journalists covering the parade also came under fire.

The assailants were apparently wearing military uniforms, and the attack lasted for about 10 minutes. The agency's Twitter account has released a set of photos showing the aftermath of the assault.

It is said that two out of four attackers were killed as troops and security forces returned fire. Two other assailants were arrested.

According to Irna, the assaults have been claimed by the "Patriotic Arab Democratic Movement in Ahwaz" group. The group blamed for the assault is affiliated with Saudi Arabia, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) spokesman Ramezan Sharif said, as cited by Press TV. Other Iranian media also consider the assailants to be linked to the Saudis, Iran's regional arch rival. There has been no reaction from the Saudi side so far, nor has Tehran elaborated on the accusations.

Iran's military later said that the terrorists were trained by two "Gulf countries" and had ties to the US and Israeli spy agency Mossad, Reuters reported citing brigadier General Abolfazl Shekarchi. Neither Washington nor Tel-Aviv have commented on the claim so far and Iran has also not elaborated on the accusation.

The attack comes as the nation commemorates the end of the eight-year Iran-Iraq War that ended in 1988. The anniversary was marked by a grand military event in Tehran, where mobile missile launchers, heavy armor, and troops paraded through the main street of the capital.

During the Tehran parade, Iranian leaders seized the opportunity to send a message to the US. Hassan Rouhani said Iran will never abandon its efforts to develop ballistic missiles, as these are "the most powerful weapons of the Islamic Republic." He stressed their "defensive" nature, however.

[yankeedoodle]

Russians know Israhell did it on purpose.  Have to wait and see what happens.  Look for, maybe, a false-flag attack that can be blamed on Russia, so that the US can invade Syria to protect Israhell from the Russians - who didn't do it, of course.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWkrGsq0UVo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K35pIQusChQ

[yankeedoodle]

At 1:03, this quote from Bashar Al-Assad:   This regrettable incident is the result of the usual Israeli impudence and rowdiness, who always use the filthiest means to achieve their unsavory goals and enact their hostility in our region.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1_opAKm3Jo

[yankeedoodle]

"Today's data does not just suggest but prove that the blame for the tragic [downing] of the Russian Il-20 airplane lies entirely with the Israeli Air Force," the major general told journalists. All Israel's "claims about its alleged noninvolvement in this tragedy that claimed lives of 15 Russian servicemen are false," he added.   

Russian MoD: Israeli F-16 hid behind Russian Il-20 plane to avoid Syrian missile
https://www.rt.com/news/439246-russian-mod-israeli-f-16-hid/

Data captured by Russia's S-400 system in Syria proves Israeli jets were responsible for downing of the Russian plane, the Defense Ministry said, adding that the Syrian missile changed its course shortly before hitting the Il-20.

Data gleaned from the S-400 air defense system deployed at the Russian Khmeimim air base in Syria's Latakia province has revealed that the Syrian anti-air missile was, in fact, targeting an Israeli F-16 jet before it abruptly altered its course and eventually hit the Russian aircraft. This, and the position of all the aircraft at the moment of the September 17 incident, proves that an Israeli jet was de facto using the larger Il-20 as a cover, the Russian Defense Ministry spokesman, Major General Igor Konashenkov told journalists at Monday's news briefing.

Radar data of the Russian S-400 air defense system showing position of 4 Israeli F-16 jets (yellow), the Syrian air defense missile (red), and the Russian Il-20 plane (green) at the time of its downing on September 17, 2018 © Ministry of Defense
The radar images revealed at the briefing "clearly showed the direction of the flight of the S-200 missile launched by the Syrian air defense system, as well as the locations of the Russian and Israeli aircraft," Konashenkov said, adding that "it is quite clear that the missile was targeting the Israeli jet."

However, the missile then suddenly changed its course and "locked on a target with a larger radar cross-section and slower speed," which was the Russian reconnaissance plane coming in for landing. The Israeli jet, which effectively used the Il-20 as a cover from the attack, then also abruptly changed its altitude and the flight direction, Konashenkov said.

The Israeli aircraft then continued to patrol the area off the Syrian coast, the radar data shows, refuting the claims by the Israeli Defense Forces that their planes had already returned to Israeli airspace at the moment of the incident.

"Today's data does not just suggest but prove that the blame for the tragic [downing] of the Russian Il-20 airplane lies entirely with the Israeli Air Force," the major general told journalists. All Israel's "claims about its alleged noninvolvement in this tragedy that claimed lives of 15 Russian servicemen are false," he added.

Earlier, the Russian MoD presented a minute-by-minute timeline of the Il-20 downing. It said that the Israeli Air Force gave the Russian side less than a minute's warning before their air raid, leaving virtually no time for any safety maneuvers. Moreover, the Israelis misinformed the Russians about the location of their targets.

Israel expressed its condolences to Russia over the tragedy but repeatedly denied responsibility while pinning the blame on Damascus. On Sunday, the Israeli Defense Force said that the Israeli planes "did not hide behind any aircraft and... the Israeli aircraft were in Israeli airspace at the time of the downing of the Russian plane."

[yankeedoodle]

From Phil Giraldi:

The Path to World War III
Risky Israeli behavior threatens everyone
http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/the-path-to-world-war-iii/

The minimal U.S. press coverage accorded to last Monday's shooting down of a Russian intelligence plane off the coast of Syria is, of course, a reflection both of lack of interest and of Israel's involvement in the incident. If one had read the New York Times or the Washington Post on the morning after the shoot-down or watched the morning network news it would have been easy to miss the story altogether. The corporate media's desire to sustain established foreign policy narratives while also protecting Israel at all costs is as much a feature of American television news as are the once every five minutes commercials from big pharma urging the public to take medications for diseases that no one has ever heard of.

Israel is, of course, claiming innocence, that it was the Syrians who shot down the Russian aircraft while the Israeli jets were legitimately targeting a Syrian army facility "from which weapons-manufacturing systems were supposed to be transferred to Iran and Hezbollah." Seeking to undo some of the damage caused, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly telephoned Russian President Vladimir Putin to express his condolences. He also sent his air force chief to Russia on Thursday to provide a detailed report on what had occurred from the Israeli perspective.

But that story, however it will be spun, is inevitably only part of the tale. The narrative of what occurred is by now well established. The Russian aircraft was returning to base after a mission over the Mediterranean off the Syrian coast monitoring the activities of a French warship and at least one British RAF plane. As a large and relatively slow propeller driven aircraft on a routine intelligence gathering mission, the Ilyushin 20 had no reason to conceal its presence. It was apparently preparing to land at its airbase at Khmeimim in Syria when the incident took place. It may or may not have had its transponder on, which would signal to the Syrian air defenses that it was a "friendly."

Syrian air defenses were on high alert because Israel had attacked targets near Damascus on the previous day. On that occasion a Boeing 747 on the ground that Israel claimed was transporting weapons was the target. One should note in passing that Israeli claims about what it is targeting in Syria are never independently verifiable.

The Israelis for their part were using four F-16 fighter bombers to stage a surprise night attack on several sites near Latakia, close to the airbase being used by the Russians. They came in from the Mediterranean Sea and clearly were using the Russian plane to mask their approach as the Ilyushin 20 would have presented a much larger radar profile for the air defenses. The radar systems on the F-16s would also have clearly seen the Russian plane.

The Israelis might have been expecting that the Syrians would not fire at all at the incoming planes knowing that one of them at least was being flown by their Russian allies. If that was the expectation, it proved wrong and it was indeed a Syrian S-200 ground to air missile directed by its guidance system to the larger target that brought down the plane and killed its fourteen crew members. The Israelis completed their bombing run and flew back home. There were also reports that the French frigate offshore fired several missiles during the exchange, but they have not been confirmed while the British plane was also reportedly circling out of range though within the general area.

There was also a back story. The Israelis and Russian military had established a hotline, similar to the one that is used with the U.S. command in Syria, precisely intended to avoid incidents like the Ilyushin shoot-down that might escalate into a more major conflict. Israel reportedly used the line but only one minute before the incident took place, leaving no time for the Russian plane to take evasive action.

The Russian Ministry of Defense was irate. It saw the exploitation of the intelligence plane by the Israelis as a deliberate high-risk initiative. It warned "We consider these provocative actions by Israel as hostile. Fifteen Russian military service members have died because of the irresponsible actions of the Israeli military. This is absolutely contrary to the spirit of the Russian-Israeli partnership. We reserve the right for an adequate response."

Russian President Vladimir Putin was more conciliatory, saying the incident was a "chain of tragic circumstances." He contrasted it with the Turkish shoot-down of a Russian warplane in 2015, which was planned and deliberate, noting that Israel had not actually attacked the Ilyushin. Though the Putin comments clearly recognize that his country's relationship with Israel is delicate to say the least, that does not mean that he will do nothing.

Many Israelis are emigres from Russia and there are close ties between the two countries, but their views on Syria diverge considerably. As much as Putin might like to strike back at Israel in a hard, substantive way, he will likely only upgrade and strengthen the air defenses around Russian troop concentrations and warn that another "surprise" attack will be resisted. Unfortunately, he knows that he is substantially outgunned locally by the U.S., France, Britain and Israel, not to mention Turkey, and a violent response that would escalate the conflict is not in his interest. He has similarly, in cooperation with his Syrian allies, delayed a major attempt to retake terrorist controlled Idlib province, as he works out a formula with Ankara to prevent heavy handed Turkish intervention.

But there is another dimension to the story that the international media has largely chosen to ignore. And that is that Israel is now carrying out almost daily air attacks on Syria, over 200 in the past 18 months, a country with which it is not at war and which has not attacked it or threatened it in any way. It justifies the attacks by claiming that they are directed against Iran or Hezbollah, not at Syria itself. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has insisted that any peace settlement in Syria include the complete removal of Iranians, a demand that has also been repeated by the United States, which is also calling for the end to the Bashar al-Assad government and its replacement by something more "democratic."

Aggressive war directed at a non-threatening country is the ultimate war crime as defined by the Nuremberg Tribunals that followed after the Second World War, yet the United States and its poodles Britain and France have not so much as squeaked when Israel kills civilians and soldiers in its surprise attacks against targets that it alone frequently claims to be linked to the Iranians. Washington would not be in much of a position to cast the first stone anyway, as it is in Syria illegally, bombs targets regularly, to include two major cruise missile strikes, and, on at least one occasion, set a trap that reportedly succeeded in killing a large number of Russian mercenaries fighting on the Syrian government side.

And then there is the other dimension of Israeli interference with its neighbors, the secret wars in which it supports the terrorist groups operating in Syria as well as in Iran. The Netanyahu government has armed the terrorists operating in Syria and even treated them in Israeli hospitals when they get wounded. On one occasion when ISIS accidentally fired into Israeli-held territory on the Golan Heights it subsequently apologized. So, if you ask who is supporting terrorism the answer first and foremost should be Israel, but Israel pays no price for doing so because of the protection afforded by Washington, which, by the way, is also protecting terrorists.

There is, of course, an alternative explanation for the Israeli action. Netanyahu might have considered it all a win-win either way, with the Russian plane masking and enabling the Israeli attack without consequence for Israel or, perversely, producing an incident inviting retaliation from Moscow, which would likely lead to a shooting war with the United States after it inevitably steps in to support Israel's government. In either case, the chaos in Syria that Israel desires would continue and even worsen but there would also be the potential danger of a possible expansion of the war as a consequence, making it regional or even broader.

It's the same old story. Israel does risky things like attacking its neighbors because it knows it will pay no price due to Washington's support. The downing of the Russian plane through Israeli contrivance created a situation that could easily have escalated into a war involving Moscow and Washington. What Israel is really thinking when it seeks to create anarchy all around its borders is anyone's guess, but it is, to be sure, in no one's interest to allow the process to continue. It is past time for Donald Trump to fulfill his campaign promise to pull the plug on American engagement in Syria and terminate the seemingly endless cycle of wars in the Middle East.

[yankeedoodle]

With S-300's in Syria capable to shoot down planes in Israhell, the stage is set for a false-flag in which Israhell shoots down their own plane inside Israhell - it will a pilot-less drone, of course - and blame it on Syria and Russia.  At about 16:00 they discuss if Israhell will be cautious, for fear of losing their pilots.     Ain't that hilarious?  Cautious, when they have things just the way they want it?   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=9w8kb7n8pig

[yankeedoodle]

Phil Giraldi tells us that the stage is set.  All that is needed is a "minor incident."  Wonder if the Israhell can organize a "minor incident," such as a false-flag to blame Iran and/or Syria and/or Russia.

It is difficult to imagine how the United States might avoid a new war in the Middle East given the recent statements that have come out of Washington, and, given that the Russians are also active in the region, a rapid and massive escalation of something that starts out as a minor incident should not be ruled out.   

One Click Closer to Annihilation
Last week Washington threatened Iran, Syria, China, Venezuela and Russia
http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/one-click-closer-to-annihilation/



The nuclear war doomsday clock maintained on the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists website has advanced to two minutes before midnight, the closest point to possible atomic apocalypse since the end of the Cold War. In 1995 the clock was at fourteen minutes to midnight, but the opportunity to set it back even further was lost as the United States and its European allies took advantage of a weakened Russia to advance NATO into Eastern Europe, setting the stage for a new cold war, which is now underway.

It is difficult to imagine how the United States might avoid a new war in the Middle East given the recent statements that have come out of Washington, and, given that the Russians are also active in the region, a rapid and massive escalation of something that starts out as a minor incident should not be ruled out.

President Donald Trump set the tone when he harangued the United Nations last Tuesday, warning that the United States would go it alone in defense of its perceived interests, with no regard for international bodies that exist to limit armed conflict and punish those who commit war crimes.

Trump's 35-minute speech featured an anticipated long section targeting Iran. He commented that:  "Iran's leaders sow chaos, death, and destruction. They do not respect their neighbors or borders, or the sovereign rights of nations. Instead, Iran's leaders plunder the nation's resources to enrich themselves and to spread mayhem across the Middle East and far beyond... We cannot allow the world's leading sponsor of terrorism to possess the planet's most dangerous weapons. We cannot allow a regime that chants 'Death to America,' and that threatens Israel with annihilation, to possess the means to deliver a nuclear warhead to any city on Earth."

There are a number of things exaggerated or incorrect in Trump's description of Iran as well as in the conclusions he draws. The Middle East and other adjacent Muslim countries are in chaos because the United States has destabilized the region starting with the empowering of the Islamist Mujadeddin in the war against Soviet Afghanistan in the 1980s. It then invaded Afghanistan in 2001 followed by Iraq in 2003, enabling the rise of ISIS and giving local al-Qaeda affiliates a new lease on life, before turning on Damascus with the Syria Accountability Act later in the same year and then destroying the Libyan government under Barack Obama. These were, not coincidentally, policies promoted by Israel that received, as a result, bipartisan support in Congress.

The emotional description of disrespecting "neighbors, borders and sovereign rights" fits the U.S. and Israel to a "T" rather than Iran. The U.S. has soldiers stationed illegally in Syria while Israel bombs the country on an almost daily basis, so who is doing the disrespecting? Washington and Tel Aviv are also the principal supporters of terrorists in the Middle East, not Iran, – arming them, training them, hospitalizing them when they are injured, and making sure that they continue their work in attacking Syria's legitimate government.

And as for "most dangerous weapons," Iran doesn't have any and is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which Israel and the U.S. have not signed. Nor would Iran have any such weapons in the future but for the fact that Trump has backed out of the agreement to monitor and inspect Iranian nuclear research and development, which will, if anything, motivate Tehran to develop weapons to protect itself.

Trump also elaborated on the following day regarding Iran's alleged but demonstrably non-existent nuclear program when he indicated to the Security Council that Washington would go after countries that violate the rules on nuclear proliferation. He clearly meant Iran but the comment was ironic in the extreme, as Israel is the world's leading nuclear rogue nation with an arsenal of two hundred nuclear devices, having stolen the uranium and key elements of the technology from the United States in the 1960s.

Trump's new appraisal of the state of the Middle East is somewhat a turnaround. Five months ago he said that he wanted to "get out" of Syria and bring the soldiers home. But in early September, the secretary of state's special representative for Syria engagement, James Jeffrey, indicated that the U.S. would stay to counter Iranian activities.

And John Bolton has also recently had a lot to say about Iran, Syria and Russia. Last Monday he confirmed that Washington intends to keep a military presence in Syria until Iran withdraws all its forces from the country. "We're not going to leave as long as Iranian troops are outside Iranian borders, and that includes Iranian proxies and militias." On the following day, speaking at a Sheldon Adelson funded United Against Nuclear Iran Summit, he said the "murderous regime" of "mullahs in Tehran" would face serious consequences if they persist in their willingness to "lie, cheat and deceive. If you cross us, our allies, or our partners; if you harm our citizens there will indeed be hell to pay. Let my message today be clear: We are watching, and we will come after you."

John Bolton also warned the Russians about their decision to upgrade the air defenses in Syria in the wake of the recent Israeli bombing raid that led to the shooting down of a Russian intelligence plane. He said absurdly and inaccurately "The Israelis have a legitimate right to self-defense against this Iranian aggressive behavior, and what we're all trying to do is reduce tensions, reduce the possibility of major new hostilities. That's why the president has spoken to this issue and why we would regard introducing the S-300 as a major mistake."

Bolton then elaborated that "We think introducing the S-300s to the Syrian government would be a significant escalation by the Russians and something that we hope, if these press reports are accurate, they would reconsider." And regarding who was responsible for the deaths of the Russian airmen, Bolton also has a suitable explanation "There shouldn't be any misunderstanding here... The party responsible for the attacks in Syria and Lebanon and really the party responsible for the shooting down of the Russian plane is Iran."

Bolton's desire to exonerate Israel and always blame Iran is inevitably on display. He is curiously objecting to the placement of missiles that are defensive in nature, presumably because Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has asked him to do so. The only way one can be threatened by the S-300 is if you are attacking Syria, but that might be a fine point that Bolton fails to grasp as he was a draft dodger during the Vietnam War and has since that time not placed himself personally at risk in support of any of the wars he has been promoting.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis also spoke on Monday, at the Pentagon. His spin on Iran was slightly different but his message was the same. "As part of this overarching problem, we have to address Iran. Everywhere you go in the Middle East where there's instability you will find Iran. So in terms of getting to the end state of the Geneva [negotiations] process, Iran, too, has a role to play, which is to stop fomenting trouble."

To complete the onslaught, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, speaking at the same United Against Nuclear Iran Summit as Bolton, accused European nations seeking to avoid U.S. sanctions over the purchase of Iranian oil as "solidifying Iran's ranking as the number-one state sponsor of terrorism. I imagine the corrupt ayatollahs and IGRC [Revolutionary Guards] were laughing this morning."

Even the U.S. Congress has figured out that something is afoot. A bipartisan group of U.S. senators, who were carefully briefed on what to think by the Israeli government, warned after a trip to the Middle East that war between the United States and Iranian proxies is "imminent."

Iran is fun to kick around but China has also been on the receiving end of late. Last Wednesday the U.N. Security Council meeting was presided over by Donald Trump, who warned that Beijing is "meddling" in U.S. elections against him personally. It is a bizarre claim, particularly as the only country up until now demonstrated as having actually interfered in American politics in any serious way is Israel. The accusation comes on top of Washington's latest foray into the world of sanctions, directed against the Chinese government-run Equipment Development Department of the Chinese Central Military Commission and its director Li Shangfu for "engaging in significant transactions" with a Russian weapons manufacturer that is on a list of U.S. sanctioned companies.

The Chinese sanctions are serious business as they forbid conducting any transactions that go through the U.S. financial system. It is the most powerful weapon Washington has at its disposal. As most international transactions are conducted in dollars and pass through American banks that means that it will be impossible for the Chinese government to make weapons purchases from many foreign sources. If foreign banks attempt to collaborate with China to evade the restrictions, they too will be sanctioned.

So if you're paying attention to Trump, Bolton, Mattis, Pompeo and Haley you are probably digging a new bomb shelter right now. We have told Iran that it cannot send its soldiers and "proxies" outside its own borders while Syria cannot have advanced missiles to defend its airspace, which Russia is "on notice" for providing. China also cannot buy weapons from Russia while Venezuela is also being threatened because it has what is generally believed to be a terrible government. Meanwhile, America is in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan to stay while nearly all agree a war with Iran is coming soon. Everyone is the enemy and everyone hates the United States, mostly for good reasons. If this is Making America Great Again, I think I would settle for just making America "good" so we could possibly have that doomsday clock go back a couple of minutes.

[yankeedoodle]

We can see, at about 1:10 in is video, Richard Perle speaking on 911, and saying that it was necessary for the US to go to war against "states" responsible for terrorism.  He was talking about Iraq. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpZJ1URD83g

We can see, in this RT article from three days ago, that John Bolton is talking about "pursu[ing] terrorists at source," and "source" is a synonym for "state," and we know the state he has in mind is Iran.

The Trump administration has put together a six-prong counter-terrorism strategy that does not focus on a single organization and is going to "pursue terrorists at source," national security adviser John Bolton told reporters.
https://www.rt.com/usa/440357-us-new-terrorism-strategy-bolton/

We can foresee - with today being October 7, 2018, and the mid-term "elections" being November 6, 2018 - then, that they will have a "false-flag" event - perhaps Syrians, aided by Iranians, will get blamed for using a Russian S-300 to "shoot down" a plane in Israhell - planned that will justify President/King Kushner, and his puppet, shit-for-brains shabbos goy Donnie-boy, going to war against Iran, for the benefit of Israhell. 

What about the mid-term "elections?"  Guess who's going to "win."  And, with the country at war - to protect Israhell - will anybody argue about  - or tolerate anybody arguing about - some silly nonsense about the "elections" being fixed? 

But, really, maybe there would be no need to fix the "elections," since Americans are stupid enough to love Israhell, and will vote for war to benefit Israhell.

[yankeedoodle]

Part of the plan would be to neutralize any response that the Russians might make, and cyber warfare sounds like a good way to do that.

UK gearing up for cyberwar against Russia? Moscow asks London to clarify media report
https://www.rt.com/uk/440611-uk-russia-cyber-attack-libya/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

The UK military is war-gaming a cyber-strike on Russia, in a scenario where Libya's oil reserves are seized and a refugee crisis ensues, British media said. It wasn't a tabloid report, so Russia's Embassy asked for clarification.

The Sunday Times cited anonymous senior security sources, who said that London was concerned by the capability gap between the British and Russian militaries. The lack of conventional weapons makes a nuclear strike just about the only possible response by London to a Russian aggression, the report said.

"This is why cyber is so important; you can go on the offensive and turn off the lights in Moscow to tell them that they are not doing the right things," a source told the paper.

The "not-right things," according to the paper, may include occupying small islands belonging to Estonia in order to test if NATO was really eager to follow Article 5 of its treaty, which says an attack on one of its members means and aggression against the whole block.

Another scenario is that Russia may intervene in Libya in order to claim its oil and provoke a new refugee crisis in Europe, it may target a British "aircraft carrier with a nuclear-tipped torpedo."

Cyberwarfare was singled out as the best deterrence against Moscow during the weekly, highly classified planning meetings at Whitehall, the Sunday Times reported.

The Russian Embassy to the UK commented on the report by urging the British government "to clarify its stance in view of the aggressive plans in cyberspace" revealed by the paper.

https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/status/1048929437323022336

"A lack of a coherent response may serve as grounds to consider these statements credible," it said.

The embassy added that the report by the Sunday Times was in line with the "unprecedented anti-Russia information campaign and spy hysteria" unleashed by Britain.

Moscow is concerned by "irresponsible" claims and the reported plans to target the infrastructure of Russian cities, the embassy said.

Last week, the UK accused Russian hackers of stealing emails from a UK television station in 2015; of attacking the World Anti-Doping Agency last year and of breaching the Democratic National Committee (DNC) during the US presidential election campaign in 2016.

The Netherlands also said that Russian spies had hacked the Wi-Fi network of chemical arms watchdog OPCW earlier this year, to disrupt the investigation of the Skripal poisoning.

Moscow has rejected the unsubstantiated accusations, with Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova calling them a product of someone's "rich imagination."

[yankeedoodle]

Israhell installed their puppet, shit-for-brains shabbos goy Donnie-boy, to serve their purposes, including war.  American troops are beginning to suspect the worst, according to this article from "Military Times."

There's a big long article, with charts and graphs and links, here, but, below are some telling quotes.
Why today's troops fear a new war is coming soon
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2018/10/16/why-todays-troops-fear-a-new-war-is-coming-soon/

WASHINGTON — Nearly half of all current military troops believe the United States will be drawn into a major war soon, a jarring rise in anxiety among service members worried about global instability in general and Russia and China in particular, according to a new Military Times poll of active-duty troops.

About 46 percent of troops who responded to the anonymous survey of currently serving Military Times readers said they believe the U.S. will be drawn into a new war within the next year. That's a jarring increase from only about 5 percent who said the same thing in a similar poll conducted in September 2017.

The fears of war come as President Donald Trump in the last year has repeatedly emphasized improving military readiness in the face of growing threats from foreign adversaries, both loosely affiliated terrorist groups and traditional major power rivals. At the same time, top Pentagon officials have spoken publicly about the need to prepare for a conflict against a "near-peer" adversary.

Some services members believe that President Trump is contributing to the instability and fears. One soldier, a female Army sergeant first class based in Hawaii who asked to remain anonymous, said she's has seen junior enlisted soldier opt to not re-enlist due to fears that a major war could erupt soon, and that Trump has made the chances of such a war more likely.

"I feel it has never been this bad and with this many adversaries, because of the way he [Trump] chooses to do business," she told Military Times in a telephone interview.

She is afraid of a "constant conflict" occurring soon, of endless deployments and fighting.

"With the way we're growing our force, I tell my soldiers the reason we are growing the force is because we need you, and we're going to fight," she said.

[yankeedoodle]

Yesterday, the 100th anniversary of Armistice Day - 11/11/11 - the day that ended "The War to End All Wars," the degenerate fucking kikes very conspicuously attacked Gaza, and suddenly, there are reports of barrages of rocket and mortar fire from Gaza. 

I mean, come on...can't these "people" at least TRY not to leave these clues?

Just can't have any fucking peace, can we? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3E3yLBGcpU

https://twitter.com/IDFSpokesperson/status/1061733370185637888/photo/1

At least 6 Palestinians, 1 Israeli killed in IDF 'operation' in Gaza
https://www.rt.com/news/443693-gaza-israeli-op-palestinians-killed/

Israeli fighter jets striking Gaza after massive mortar fire from the strip - IDF (VIDEOS, LIVE)
https://www.rt.com/news/443764-israeli-fighter-jets-strike-gaza/

VIDEOS show Gaza rockets hurtling towards Israel
https://www.rt.com/news/443769-israel-gaza-video-attack-bus/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

[yankeedoodle]

Check out this fake video.  The kikes produced this ridiculous video, and are presenting it as having been done by Palestinian perpetrators, to justify attacking Gaza.  Escalation is their game plan.

https://twitter.com/hallal__/status/1062200470146564096

WATCH IDF bus burst into flames after being hit by missile from Gaza
https://www.rt.com/news/443831-idf-bus-rocket-attack/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

A video has surfaced online showing an Israeli military bus being hit with an anti-tank missile near the Gaza border. The attack happened during a rapid escalation of violence between Israel and Hamas.

The video, published Monday, begins with a long white bus parked behind the trees. Reportedly dozens of soldiers had just disembarked. Several figures can be seen standing behind the two white SUVs nearby.

The bus starts moving, and, once it gets out in the open, it is suddenly hit with what the IDF described as a guided anti-tank missile.

The vehicle blows up instantly and is covered by black smoke, with a few pieces seen flying high in the air. The remains of the bus are quickly engulfed in flames.

A 19-year-old Israeli soldier was "severely injured" during the attack, the army reported.

The incident happened during the most recent exchange of strikes between Hamas and Israel. Around 370 rockets were launched into Israel from Gaza, 100 of which were intercepted mid-air.

In return, Israeli fighter jets bombed over 70 targets in Gaza, while the army conducted a commando raid across the border.