Re: CBS misreports election fraud activities.

[kolnidre]

That interviewer from We Are Change, an organisation I don't entirely trust, is to be commended. It took huge stones to go up to Murray Rothstein (who took the goyishe stage name Sumner Redstone) and ask him those questions. To his credit, Rothstein was quite gracious, but I suppose it goes with the territory of always putting a nice face on the destruction of humanity.

[mobes]

That interviewer from We Are Change, an organisation I don't entirely trust, is to be commended. It took huge stones to go up to Murray Rothstein (who took the goyishe stage name Sumner Redstone) and ask him those questions. To his credit, Rothstein was quite gracious, but I suppose it goes with the territory of always putting a nice face on the destruction of humanity.

I heard that the Canadian Chapter of WeAreChange is funded by the Bronfmans. Is that true?

[MikeWB]

I heard that the Canadian Chapter of WeAreChange is funded by the Bronfmans. Is that true?

No idea but this guy that was asking questions doesn't look like he is. As for We Are Change and Luke Rudkowski... not sure what their deal is. I don't think that Luke is a Jew but he's definitely playing the AJ game of keeping his mouth/eyes/ears shut whenever there's a Zionist issue. AJ told him not to mention it so they keep on getting the money from their Hollywood friends.

[MikeWB]

As for election fraud, I have a question for all of you that claim that there's no difference between the two candidates:

1/ if they are the same, as you claim, why is there election fraud?! What exactly is the purpose of the election fraud?! Election fraud doesn't help them since it only raises more questions. Zionists would be the happiest if elections looked clean and they won if either candidate got the majority. Fraud just puts the whole election process in doubt.

2/ if the candidates are the same, why are Republicans candidates benefiting the most from the fraud? If Obama's their man, why don't they give votes to him instead?

[mobes]

As for election fraud, I have a question for all of you that claim that there's no difference between the two candidates:

1/ if they are the same, as you claim, why is there election fraud?! What exactly is the purpose of the election fraud?! Election fraud doesn't help them since it only raises more questions. Zionists would be the happiest if elections looked clean and they won if either candidate got the majority. Fraud just puts the whole election process in doubt.

2/ if the candidates are the same, why are Republicans candidates benefiting the most from the fraud? If Obama's their man, why don't they give votes to him instead?

1. I think that the election fraud is covered as an issue just to keep the left-right paradigm in place. Yes it has an effect on voter confidence but look @ what happened in 2000. The reason why GWB won was because of election fraud. The economics of the country were screwed so they Zionists had to elect a pro-war president....and Al Gore certainly did not fit that bill.

2. They will. But just to make it a little bit more realistic, they give the race more drama with all these race and sexuality 'issues' that nobody really cares about. In fact Obama is alot worse than McCain when it comes to energy policy....like it matters anyway, the country is done for....

[MikeWB]

As for election fraud, I have a question for all of you that claim that there's no difference between the two candidates:

1/ if they are the same, as you claim, why is there election fraud?! What exactly is the purpose of the election fraud?! Election fraud doesn't help them since it only raises more questions. Zionists would be the happiest if elections looked clean and they won if either candidate got the majority. Fraud just puts the whole election process in doubt.

2/ if the candidates are the same, why are Republicans candidates benefiting the most from the fraud? If Obama's their man, why don't they give votes to him instead?

1. I think that the election fraud is covered as an issue just to keep the left-right paradigm in place. Yes it has an effect on voter confidence but look @ what happened in 2000. The reason why GWB won was because of election fraud. The economics of the country were screwed so they Zionists had to elect a pro-war president....and Al Gore certainly did not fit that bill.

2. They will. But just to make it a little bit more realistic, they give the race more drama with all these race and sexuality 'issues' that nobody really cares about. In fact Obama is alot worse than McCain when it comes to energy policy....like it matters anyway, the country is done for....

1/ that doesn't answer any of my questions. Specifically, what purpose does traceable vote rigging serve to rulers? To undermine their own system? It makes absolutely NO sense to me.

2/ Really?! All of the vote riggings so far, according to BlackBoxVoting have been heavily in Republican/Neocon favor and CEOs of these companies are Republicans and their corporate boards are full of neocons/zionists/republicans. Why won't Obama get any votes if he's so zio-leaning?

Finally, why are Israeli Jews with dual citizenships so heavily in favor of McCain? Read the story I just posted about that.

The differences between Obama and McCain might be small but they're there! It's irresponsible to say that there's none.