LINKS: Adolf Hitler was a Crypto-Jew

[joeblow]

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/2756
Adolf Hitler the Co-Founder of Israel
"The reader might look unsuccessfully FOR A BOOK THAT LONG AGO DISAPPEARED FROM THE MARKET . (now who would have done that??!!)

https://www.flashback.info/showthread.php?t=1212
HITLER WAS JEWISH ORIGIN
Hitler was so concerned that when he annexed Austria, in 1938, he ordered that his family's ancestral village, Dollersheim, and all neighboring villages be destroyed.

http://christianparty.net/hitler.htm
Adolf Hitler: Austrian jew
Hitler's fruits: 264 million dead or missing Christians

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jso ... erjew.html
Jewish Virtual Library
Was Hitler Jewish?

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/rea ... art-jewish
Was Hitler part Jewish?
Throughout his career he was dogged by rumors about his pedigree, some of them circulated by his fellow Nazis.

http://www.times.com/books/first/r/rose ... itler.html
Explaining Hitler
In his discussion of the controversial assertion, in a pre-execution Nuremberg memoir by Hitler's one-time private attorney Hans Frank, that Frank had uncovered evidence to support the view that the mysterious stranger/paternal grandfather of Hitler was a Jew, Jetzinger cites "this curious fact which may be interpreted as bearing out Frank's story"

http://smoter.com/defuhrer.htm
18: Der Fuhrer
The rumor of "Hitler's Jewish descent" quickly spread though Munich that July.*  Hitler was outraged and took a bold and unauthorized move.

http://www.dittatori.it/hitler-eng.htm
ADOLF HITLER
Soviet propaganda insisted Hitler was a Jew, though more modern research tends to diminish the probability that he had Jewish ancestors.

http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/ ... 09,00.html
Iran: Hitler was a Jew
Advisor to President Ahmadinejad claims Nazi leader was Jew who conspired with USSR and Britain to establish Jewish state

http://www.israeltoday.co.il/default.as ... &nid=10957
Hitler a Jew?
"Hitler was a Jew who helped found Israel."

[gurdgieff]

I think all this talk about Adolf Hitler being a Jew should be discarded.
Adolf did try to establish a Jewish state it was called the resettlment plan for the jewish menace.there goes a bit of the holocaust garbage.
Hitler was no NWO, If anything he was fighting against NWO.

[Mac Seafraidh]

I think all this talk about Adolf Hitler being a Jew should be discarded.
Adolf did try to establish a Jewish state it was called the resettlment plan for the jewish menace.there goes a bit of the holocaust garbage.
Hitler was no NWO, If anything he was fighting against NWO.

Agreed, but those who say Hitler was a Zionist for creating homeland for Jews in Madagascar are wrong. Zionism, you physically have to be pro-jewish, which Hitler was not. I heard that on a Prothink show and just disagreed with it. It was said by GP I think. Correct me if I am wrong.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

I've heard all of the "Hitler" was Jewish narratives. While interesting, I never saw any mention of Hitler being Jewish by his best friend August Kubizek, who by the way, has not been proven a fraud. I take his account of the character and background of Hitler as the most authoritative above all others.  Almost all people claiming Hitler was "gay" or some sh*t like that are typically Jews and promoters of J*w Sh*t. While his family has connections to Jews and Hitler's cousin in Ireland once threatened to tell all the family secrets, I think Kubizek would have told all if he had a hint of Hitler's Jewishness.  Funny thing was though, that Hitler once did have a crush on a Jewish girl according to Kubizek in his younger, less "well informed" days, before he saw the machinations of International Jewry.

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/August+Ku ... 0158681409


READ THIS BOOK!
----------------------------

The Young Hitler I Knew
by August Kubizek

August Kubizek met Adolf Hitler in 1904 while they were both competing for standing room at the opera.  Their mutual passion for music created a strong bond, and over the next four years they became close friends, and eventually roommates.  The Young Hitler I Knew tells the story an an extraordinary friendship, and gives fascinating insight into Hitler's character during these formative years.  This is the edition to be published in English since 1955, and it corrects many changes made for reasons of political correctness.  It also includes important sections that were excised from the original English translation.

[Mac Seafraidh]

What probably happened with these allegations of Hitler being Jewish is the Jew probably infiltrated these conspiracy groups and just blindsided others from the truth.

[Free Truth]

I think all this talk about Adolf Hitler being a Jew should be discarded.
Adolf did try to establish a Jewish state it was called the resettlment plan for the jewish menace.there goes a bit of the holocaust garbage.
Hitler was no NWO, If anything he was fighting against NWO.

Also agree...

[GordZilla]

What probably happened with these allegations of Hitler being Jewish is the Jew probably infiltrated these conspiracy groups and just blindsided others from the truth.

Yup, further effort to confuse the issue. Discard it. You can always spot their work, it always proves to be irrelevant to our current situation, hell its usually irrelevant to everything really.

[Mac Seafraidh]

Fascism and National Socialism are GREAT!!!

My Muslim Moroccan-Spaniard Great Grandparents were pleasantly removed from their university teaching positions and city apartment, had their olive orchard and farmhouse taken by the state and all their funds nationalized by the bestest fascist ever Generalissimo Franco!

They had to make a quick exile to lovely Mexico where they taught public school and lived in near squalor in Mexicali Mexico and never recovered their hard earnings, nor did any of their children get to go to university.

I thank sweet baby Jesus every day for fascism and national socialism!

I love working my ass off since the age of 13, and having had to file bankruptcy at 42 and working 65+ hours a week at age 44!

Can wait till I drop dead on the job at age 65, to think, I could have been a happy little olive farmer with a higher education!

Thank you fascists!!!

Franco was not really a Fascist as much as the Falangists were, but I can kind of understand why your relatives were removed. It is simply healthy nationalism. Your relatives were not murdered via Franco. You should be blessed for that. I am not anti-Muslim per say because I do think Muslims can help Indo-Europeans greatly in the war against Jewry and No I am not going to say Zionism because every Jew is a culprit of all the crimes they've committed as a whole. As far as them living abroad(away from Muslim lands), it does not bother me too much as long as they do not become a majority.

Now, yeah it is horrible that you have to work your ass so badly that it's draining your life, but it is not Fascism to blame. It is Judeo-capitalism. - http://www.paragoy.com/

[Mac Seafraidh]

Léon Degrelle

German racialism has been deliberately distorted. It never was an anti-"other race" racialism. It was a pro-German racialism. It was concerned with making the German race strong and healthy in every way. Hitler was not interested in having millions of degenerates, if it was in his power not to have them. Today one finds rampant alcohol and drug addiction everywhere. Hitler cared that the German families be healthy, cared that they raise healthy children for the renewal of a healthy nation. German racialism meant re-discovering the creative values of their own race, re-discovering their culture. It was a search for excellence, a noble idea. National Socialist racialism was not against the other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and improving its race, and wished that all other races did the same for themselves.

That was demonstrated when the Waffen SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS. The Waffen SS respected their way of fife, their customs, and their religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an imam, each company had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their highest expression. This was our racialism. I was present when each of my Islamic comrades received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a pendant with a small Koran. Hitler was honoring them with this small symbolic gift. He was honoring them with what was the most important aspect of their lives and their history. National Socialist racialism was loyal to the German race and totally respected all other races.

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v03/v03p441_Degrelle.html

[Mac Seafraidh]

Italo-German racecar driver - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Caracciola

[high_treason]

I don't really agree with National Socialism, I do see it as just another form of control over the masses and just like the rest of socialist doctrines my grandfather's factory was also "nationalized" by another so called National socialist but of another form in a twisted way Gamal AbdelNasser was as much a 'Nationalist' as he was a 'Socialist', he believed in Pan-Arabism as the only form of acceptable governance and made sure his mini revolutions around the Arab world followed his twisted doctrine thats why you have so many fucked up places in the Middle East.

Examples: Iraq - Supressing the Kurds, Moors (Algieria and Tunisia) supressing Amazigh, Yemeni supressing Zanzibars and Egypt supressing the Nubians.

They also followed this twisted doctrine of Arab socialism which takes a very secular view of Arab unity while ignoring the more important fact about the so called Arab nations is that they used to be Islamic empires and never Arab empires. As for his socialism, he practiced communism (Lite) and so did his stooges like Asad in Syria and Qadafi in Lybia. Its a twisted form of National socialism but thats the only name I can think of to describe it.

Hitler even as a character excluding the whole 'Hating Jews' or 'Jewish heritage' thing wasn't a good leader, he executed a lot of people, supressed freedoms and made terrible strategic decisions during wartime because of his paranoia towards his generals which left a lot of competent leaders alienated by his decisions. Besides he wasn't so different than israhell, he wanted to kill and enslave Slavs, even though Russia and most of Eastern Europe was there home. Not to mention his belief in racial suprimacy which I don't see as being positive either, any racist ideology I despise whether it is Jewish or White.

As far as the 'All Jews' are guilty I also have to disagree with that. You cannot lump an entire group of people in to one category its no different than the rightwing nuts in the USA who are saying all Muslims are terrorists. There are a lot of Jews who are helping in this fight and are speaking out against the racism and autrocities committed by the Jews. The whole concept of "the myth of the good Jew" I cannot agree with it, we have crazy bad people of all colors and creed. Look at the Christian zionists these people are predominantly of White  European descent and they are even more sick and twisted than the Jewish criminals that we are fighting. Jews have lived with us Muslims for 1400 years without any problems to speak of, there was no usury, they were free to practice trade and they made a large bulk of the merchants and educated class and their Synogougs were protected, just like Christians yet they never aspired to take over our governments because the system was setup fairly, no discrimination against people of other faiths, colors or creeds, government leader is the Khalif and he appoints capable Wali on regions and while the Wali has executive power he cannot function without the acceptance of the Sharia Judge, as for Jews and Christians they have their own seperate laws regarding internal conflicts setup by their religious leaders and if a conflict arises between a Muslim and a non-Muslim there is no siding except with what is right so no discrimination when it comes to applying the law , this was the main reason why you didn't see any uprisings against the Muslims during the crusades even though in a country like Egypt more than half of the population was Christian at the time.

We didn't have any problems with Jews until the zionist ideology came in to existance, thats what caused the rift, in contrast with the European Jews whether they are Khazar or not, they weren't exactly treated well in Europe. They were persecuted (I know I will get flamed for this) but it did happen, every crusading army that wanted to march on Muslim lands or whenever the Catholic church felt like people were getting angry they would send out decrees for mass slaughters this did cause their current pyschotic behaviour of the 'Anti-Semites are out to get you'. I don't condone their current behaviour towards us especially that we weren't involved in any of that but this is something I had to get off my chest, Europe also found it convinient to have a country in the land that they fought to take and lost it so many times, as well as getting rid of Jews in their own countries whom many disliked. The Rothschilds are at the head of it but the British monarchy also saw the benefit of it, they authorized the printing of the Scofield Refernced Bible through Oxford university for God's sake, which is one of the biggest thorn in America's side, since it basically gives you 70 million Americans who are HARDCORE zionists and would probably die for israhell than see it go away!

[§N9sh2bj]

Wankers for Hitler crowd.

Hitler, or Hüttler, was an Austrian-born Ashkenazi, from a family who had earlier come from the Polish Ashkenazi community.

Official Austrian Government report of the 1930's.

Know them by what they do, not by what they say.

Hitler* set up the fraudulent nation of Israel within the area of Palestine. He created the [the final] expulsion from Europe of Jews. Hitler received over 500 million in American currency equivalent funding (a recent valuation) from the Rothschild banking group from 1929-1933.

* By which is meant Hitler and his collected group of upper officials, much like writing 'Bush' when implying 'Bush, Khayney, Krumsfendl, so on'.

The present-day Ashkenazi are fire-bombing Gaza. Go with them if you wish, instead of posting scurrilous nonsense here!

--
It can only be love, it if is consensual. Fucking you in the ass, and you like it!  

[Roy Hobs]

High-Treason wrote:
".....They (the Jews) were persecuted but it did happen, every crusading army that wanted to march on Muslim lands or whenever the Catholic church felt like people were getting angry they would send out decrees for mass slaughters...."


I'm currently reading E. Michael Jones' book, "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit".  Jones makes the case that this 'hatred' or 'anti-semitism' was justified because of Usuary.  The Crusaders who murdered Jews along the way to Jerusalem were heavily in debt to Jews and angry.  

I'm not suggesting that "killing because of Usuary" is a justifiable homicide.  But I think to be fair, we should be accurate with the information.  

It wasn't that they were just killing Jews for the sake of killing Jews.  They had reasons and for them -- the Crusaders -- they were justified in killing those who were oppressing them economically.  

Food for thought.

[Mac Seafraidh]

Hitler, or Hüttler, was an Austrian-born Ashkenazi, from a family who had earlier come from the Polish Ashkenazi community.

Hüttler?!?!?!?! Where did that name come from? I thought the name was originally Schicklgruber. You have no source either, so I call it rubbish on the get-go. Hitler was born with the name Hitler though, it was the father Alois who changed it.

[high_treason]

It wasn't that they were just killing Jews for the sake of killing Jews. They had reasons and for them -- the Crusaders -- they were justified in killing those who were oppressing them economically.

But not all were involved in Usury, not every single Jew in Europe was a Usurer they were just generalizing in killing everyone including women and children who had no part whatsoever in it. The Spanish inquisition also killed many for no reason just because they didn't want to change their faith, the Crusaders also did in the sack of Constantinople and when they took over Acre, Jaffa and Jerusalem and the Eastern Jews had nothing to do with European usury, they weren't involved in it when they were living amongst us. As I said before Eastern Jews were doctors, philosophers and merchants for the most part and intermarriage was not uncommon, since they were assimiliated, also one of the greatest religious authorities of Eastern Jews Maimondes (Salah-U-Dinn's personal physician) here is what he said about Muslims:

"The Ishmaelites are not at all idolaters; [idolatry] has long been severed from their mouths and hearts; and they attribute to God a proper unity" He also stated that if a Jew cannot find a synogouge he can pray in a Mosque (while not the same case for a Church).  

We even share the same name of God "Elah" = "Allah" But when the ashkNAZI came from Europe with all the hate they are baring from Europe towards all non-White Jews, thats when things started changing and that was the cause of all the turmoil we have here. The main cause of all these problems are ashkNAZI, all the leadership is ashkNAZI but even in ashkNAZI you have some who are against the crimes being committed, Ben Freedman, Jack Bernstein, Norman Finkelstein, Joel Kovel and many others. I believe their hatred towards us and even non-White Jews has been built in to their psyche because of their time in Europe and don't forget in Judiasm revenge is a big thing and so they saw fit once they had control to take their revenge upon all, even though Europeans of now have nothing to do with Europeans of the past and the Muslims were not involved in it at all. I think they even hate the non-White Jews because they didn't suffer any pograms, exiles or mass slaughters and were assimilated, which is something extremely unforgivable by the ashkNAZI they want them in the large nicer ghetto otherwise known as israhell.

[Roy Hobs]

I also just read in Jones' book "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit"...............third chapter I believe....

That around the time of the first Crusade was when the "Talmud" became public.  Meaning.........people (mainly Catholics) became aware of the Talmud because it was now in written form, whereas before, it was mostly oral.  The Talmud was a huge threat to civilization at that time (and now of course).

Thus............another reason for the indiscriminate killings of Jews along the way to Palestine, I guess.

Certainly not enough of an excuse, but we certainly were not present during those times and we have no way of understanding the 'climate'.  

It's not an excuse, just an explanation.

[Mac Seafraidh]

Finkelstein is a hypocrite. He says in his Holohoax industry book that Jews use the particular non-existing event to further their interest which is true, BUT when he was interview by Sahar TV in a debate with Lady Renouf he had to point out how many Jew supposedly died. I do not get why people on here feel they need to have Jewish allies. Even under National Socialism they did a very few half Jew soldiers, but still they were looked upon as a disgrace. The Jews as a whole need to be tried for keeping their mouths shut for crimes against Muslims, crimes against whites, etc. Why are entire school curriculums nothing but anti-caucasian lies, distorted truths? You do not get real education in most schools in the world today. Why aren't the average so-called good Jews not speaking out. Also, I believe the crusades is a great big fib too. This could've been a strategy the Jews planned to get Indo-Europeans angry at Muslims. I could go on all day. There is many events that could be listed.

[GordZilla]

Hitler* set up the fraudulent nation of Israel within the area of Palestine. He created the [the final] expulsion from Europe of Jews. Hitler received over 500 million in American currency equivalent funding (a recent valuation) from the Rothschild banking group from 1929-1933.

* By which is meant Hitler and his collected group of upper officials, much like writing 'Bush' when implying 'Bush, Khayney, Krumsfendl, so on'.

The present-day Ashkenazi are fire-bombing Gaza. Go with them if you wish, instead of posting scurrilous nonsense here!

--
It can only be love, it if is consensual. Fucking you in the ass, and you like it!  

So Hitler penned the Belfour Declaration? No. The plan was already there, all they had to do was instigate aggression against the first leader who caught on to their underhandedness, they found it in Hitler and declared war on him - first. Hitler in turn played into their hands by having Jews extradited from Germany and the Reich. Of course they helped pay for that for in the end it supported their cause.  Hitler is OBVIOUSLY not the founder of Israel, he only helped fill her borders. They planned for, an obtained, Israel long before him.

Fascism and National Socialism are often used interchangeably but they are actually slightly different. But again this is all distraction. Even though your feathers get all ruffled when you hear the words 'fascism' and 'National Socialism', your real enemy is actually communism. That is the ideology we're currently suffering under. Although this hardly spooks anyone anymore, does it? You are trained from birth to dislike and like what they want you too. Assuming that just because you woke up  to their tricks, that now you see threw ALL of it is a foolish move.

[Mac Seafraidh]

Finkelstein is a hypocrite. He says in his Holohoax industry book that Jews use the particular non-existing event to further their interest which is true, BUT when he was interview by Sahar TV in a debate with Lady Renouf he had to point out how many Jew supposedly died..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM49xKgn ... annel_page

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEN2aFhI ... annel_page

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rtb-yAiz ... annel_page

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwxkt7lb ... annel_page

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aF5gqA93 ... annel_page

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9324D2p ... annel_page

[§N9sh2bj]

Hüttler?!?!?!?! Where did that name come from?

Read your available sources instead of asking silly questions.

Seriously, I am sending you shortly a PM on it, if you choose to respond as you didn't my other, either way that's fine, but let's do it in PM'land. I have said as much as is enough on this thread. I'm done with it.

[gurdgieff]

how sick jewish propaganda is,to even go to the extent of saying hitler was bastard son of a rothschild because his mother was working as a cleaner in a rothschild houshold.how confused do they think they can make us.
look at the pic of hitlers parents,both of them resemble hitler.
Mac Seafraidh mentioned homeland for Jews in Madagascar.
Adolf did have a resettlment plan for jews to settle in the island called Madagascar and it was a great Idea,no neighbours,just the sea.
hitler was nice to the jews he put them in butlins type holiday camps and went out of his way for them and try to get them theyre own country,he even tried to send them all to the tropical island paradise of madagascar. and give them a new life. he just wanted rid of them out of europe.
why arnt the jewish people at the forefront of a war against zionism?. they are the first ones who will suffer the backlash , I know some of them are fighting such as, norman finkelstein, rabbi weiss and david cole.
only trust athiest jews.slightly.

[high_treason]

The problem with Hitler is that people either hate him or love him, I for one believe he was an agent but thats just my opinion whether he is a Rothschild or not is irrelevant. Regarding his summer camps, I did see a few pictures of that but I don't think they were 'summer camps' and he did sign the Havaara treaty 1933 with the zionists (who are athiest Jews btw) to send them to Palestine as soon as he came to power the maiden voyage of the Tel Aviv steamer in 1935 to Palestine and the first country to immigrate Jews formally was Nazi Germany!

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

-- The Jew Hugh Trevor Roper's comment on Kubizek's book:

And what is the character which Hitler showed to Kubizek in these four years of friendship? It is a
far more human and, in my opinion, a far more plausible character than that to which Greiner's
book has accustomed us. Externally Hitler sill appears a drifting character: he has failed at
school, has no employment, has been rejected by the Academy, is in Vienna for no clearly stated
purpose, lives on a pittance eked out by painting postcards. But behind this shiftless exterior
Kubizek constructs what must have been there, although it was not apparent to casual
acquaintances: the character of the man who, from these beginnings, without any other natural
advantages besides his own personality, became the most powerful and terrible tyrant and
conqueror of modern history. Here we see -- along with the incipient monomania, the repetitive
clichés, and the Wagnerian romanticism of his later years -- the early evidence of that
unbreakable will power, that extraordinary self-confidence. We see the penniless, unemployed,
unemployable young Hitler, at sixteen, confidently rebuilding in his imagination the city of Linz, as
he was afterwards to rebuild it in fact, and never for a moment doubting that he would one day
carry out these improbable plans; we see him exercising over an elderly Austrian upholsterer that
irresistible hypnotic power with which he was afterwards to seduce a whole nation; we see him, in
Vienna, fortifying himself against a corrupt and purposeless society by adopting an iron
asceticism, like some ancient crusader guarding himself against corruption in a pagan world. And
then turning to detail, we see in Vienna, when Kubizek was closest to him, the working of Hitler's
mind as it feels its way towards the beginnings of national socialism: his crude, voracious but
systematic reading; his sudden discovery of politics; his hatred of the social injustice of urban life
represented to him, the architect, by squalid slum buildings; his fear -- the fear which he was
afterwards to exploit among millions of lower-middle-class Germans -- of sinking into proletarian
status. Behind the outward meaninglessness of his hand-to-mouth existence we see the inner
purposefulness of his studies, his experiences, his reasoning. The account may sometimes be
romanticised, but not, I think, much, or more than is legitimate and indeed inevitable in the
recollections of youth. By all external checks Kubizek's account is reliable, and to anyone who
has studied the mind and character of Hitler it is also inherently plausible. Hitler's character, in the
years after 1908, undoubtedly became harder and more hateful: experience caused it to set into a
hideous inhumanity. In some respects it also changed, not its quality but its direction. We learn
casually from Kubizek that in his Vienna days, Hitler was a pacifist; and certainly the ruthlessness
of his later worship of war becomes more comprehensible when we realise that it was the religion
of a convert. But fundamentally we see here what we have never seen before, and what
superficial observers have never shown: the formation of that positive character which afterwards
achieved the dreadful miracle of our century; the character of the man who, in circumstances of
apparent hopelessness, resolved not to rest till he had found an answer not only to his problem,
but to the problem of a continent. "He did not know what resignation meant," says Kubizek. "He
who resigned, he thought, lost his right to live."
----------

Chapter 10 -- In That Hour It Began
It was the most impressive hour I ever lived through with my friend. So unforgettable is it, that
even the most trivial things, the clothes Adolf wore that evening, the weather, are still present in
my mind as though the experience were exempt from the passing of time.
Adolf stood outside my house in his black overcoat, his dark hat pulled down over his face. It was
a cold, unpleasant November evening. He waved to me impatiently. I was just cleaning myself up
from the workshop and getting ready to go to the theatre. Rienzi was being given that night. We
had never seen this Wagner opera and looked forward to it with great excitement. In order to
secure the pillars in the Promenade we had to be early. Adolf whistled, to hurry me up.
Now we were in the theatre, burning with enthusiasm, and living breathlessly through Rienzi's rise
to be the Tribune of the people of Rome and his subsequent downfall. When at last it was over, it
was past midnight. My friend, his hands thrust into his coat pockets, silent and withdrawn, strode
through the streets and out of the city. Usually, after an artistic experience that had moved him,
he would start talking straight away, sharply criticizing the performance, but after Rienzi he
remained quiet a long while. This surprised me, and I asked him what he thought of it. He threw
me a strange, almost hostile glance. "Shut up!" he said brusquely.
The cold, damp mist lay oppressively over the narrow streets. Our solitary steps resounded on
the pavement. Adolf took the road that led up to the Freinberg. Without speaking a word, he
strode forward. He looked almost sinister, and paler than ever. His turned-up coat collar
increased this impression.
I wanted to ask him, "Where are you going?" But his pallid face looked so forbidding that I
suppressed the question.
As if propelled by an invisible force, Adolf climbed up to the top of the Freinberg. And only now
did I realize that we were no longer in solitude and darkness, for the stars shone brilliantly above
us.
Adolf stood in front of me; and now he gripped both my hands and held them tight. He had never
made such a gesture before. I felt from the grasp of his hands how deeply moved he was. His
eyes were feverish with excitement. The words did not come smoothly from his mouth as they
usually did, but rather erupted, hoarse and raucous. From his voice I could tell even more how
much this experience had shaken him.
Gradually his speech loosened, and the words flowed more freely. Never before and never again
have I heard Adolf Hitler speak as he did in that hour, as we stood there alone under the stars, as
though we were the only creatures in the world.
I cannot repeat every word that my friend uttered. I was struck by something strange, which I had
never noticed before, even when he had talked to me in moments of the greatest excitement. It
was as if another being spoke out of his body, and moved him as much as it did me. It wasn't at
all a case of a speaker being carried away by his own words. On the contrary; I rather felt as
though he himself listened with astonishment and emotion to what burst forth from him with
elementary force. I will not attempt to interpret this phenomenon, but it was a state of complete
ecstasy and rapture, in which he transferred the character of Rienzi, without even mentioning him
as a model or example, with visionary power to the plane of his own ambitions. But it was more
than a cheap adaptation. Indeed, the impact of the opera was rather a sheer external impulse
which compelled him to speak. Like flood waters breaking their dikes, his words burst forth from
him. He conjured up in grandiose, inspiring pictures his own future and that of his people.
Hitherto I had been convinced that my friend wanted to become an artist, a painter, or perhaps an
architect. Now this was no longer the case. Now he aspired to something higher, which I could
not yet fully grasp. It rather surprised me, as I thought that the vocation of the artist was for him
the highest, most desirable goal. But now he was talking of a mandate which, one day, he would
receive from the people, to lead them out of servitude to the heights of freedom.
It was an unknown youth who spoke to me in that strange hour. He spoke of a special mission
which one day would be entrusted to him, and I, his only listener, could hardly understand what
he meant. Many years had to pass before I realized the significance of this enraptured hour for
my friend.
His words were followed by silence.
We descended into the town. The clock struck three. We parted in front of my house. Adolf shook
hands with me, and I was astonished to see that he did not go in the direction of his home, but
turned again towards the mountains.
"Where are you going now?" I asked him, surprised. He replied briefly, "I want to be alone."

In the following weeks and months he never again mentioned this hour on the Freinberg. At first it
struck me as odd and I could find no explanation for his strange behavior, for I could not believe
that he had forgotten it altogether. Indeed he never did forget it, as I discovered thirty-three years
later. But he kept silent about it because he wanted to keep that hour entirely to himself. That I
could understand, and I respected his silence. After all, it was his hour, not mine. I had played
only the modest role of a sympathetic friend.

In 1939, shortly before war broke out, when I, for the first time visited Bayreuth as the guest of the
Reichs Chancellor, I thought I would please my host by reminding him of that nocturnal hour on
the Freinberg, so I told Adolf Hitler what I remembered of it, assuming that the enormous
multitude of impressions and events which had filled these past decades would have pushed into
the background the experience of a seventeen year old youth. But after a few words I sensed that
he vividly recalled that hour and had retained all its details in his memory. He was visibly pleased
that my account confirmed his own recollections. I was also present when Adolf Hitler retold this
sequel to the performance of Rienzi in Linz to Frau Wagner, at whose home we were both
guests. Thus my own memory was doubly confirmed. The words with which Hitler concluded his
story to Frau Wagner are also unforgettable for me.

He said solemnly, "In that hour it began."

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

The end came; the war was lost. Even though I, a fundamentally unpolitical individual, had always
kept aloof from the political events of the period which ended forever in 1945, nevertheless no
power on earth could compel me to deny my friendship with Adolf Hitler.

My first and most pressing worry in this respect was the safety of the Hitler papers I possessed,
Come what may, they must be saved for posterity. Years before I had carefully put the letters,
postcards and drawings in cellophane covers to protect them from wear as I showed them
around. Now I locked them up in a solid leather case. Then I removed several bricks in the deep,
vaulted cellar of my house in Eferding, thrust the case into the cavity and filled in the hole again
so carefully that not the slightest trace of this work remained. It was only just in time as the very
next day I was arrested and held for sixteen months in the notorious detention camp of
Glasenbach. Naturally, an intensive search was made during my absence for the Hitler papers,
but with no success.
In the beginning I was often questioned, first in Eferding, then in Gmunden. These interrogations
all ran on the same lines; something like:

"You are a friend of Adolf Hitler's?"
"Yes."
"Since when?"
"Since 1904."
"What do you mean by that? At that time he was nobody."
"Nevertheless, I was his friend."
"How could you be his friend when he was still a nobody?"
An American officer of the Central Intelligence Corps asked: "So you are a friend of Adolf Hitler's.
What did you get out of it?"
"Nothing."
"But you admit that you were his friend. Did he give you money?"
"No."
"Or food?"
"Neither."
"A car, a house?"
"Not that either."
"Did he introduce you to beautiful women?"
"Nor that."
"Did he receive you again, later on?"
"Yes."
"Did you see him often?"
"Occasionally."
"How did you manage to see him?"
"I just went to him."
"So you were with him. Really? Quite close?"
"Yes, quite close."
"Alone?"
"Alone."
"Without any guard?"
"Without any guard."
"So you could have killed him?"
"Yes, I could have."
"And why didn't you kill him?"

"Because he was my friend."

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Some info on Alfred Rosenberg, a Jewish Nazi Intellectual:
-----

Alfred Rosenberg, Reich Minister Eastern Territories.

Nazi Inner Circle Party Member, closer to Hess and Himmler than Hitler, Goebbels or Speer who often mocked him in private as the "Party Philospher" (Albert Speer: "Infiltration").

Born in Estonia and fled to Germany after the "Reds" took over which he and other "Whites" continually lobbied Hitler to reverse by invading Russia. This Eastern contingent of ethnic Germans and others who fled Lenin and Trotsky formed one of the key groupings in the inner circle of the party, paralleling other exile communities in history such as the later Miami Cuban's for the virolent fervour of their anti-communism. (Toland: "Adolf Hitler")

Rosenbergs mystical work "The Myth of the Twentieth Century" was as important if not more so than Hitler's Mein Kampf as setting the party line in it's radical line to deal "once and for all" with the "Judeo-Bolshevik Menace", as was his roll as Master Propaganist as publisher of the Party Newspaper "The Volkischer Beobachter" (Speer: "Inside the Third Reich").

His statements were virolently Anti-Semitc but it is conceivable that this was merely a device as part of his contingent's lobby efforts to reverse the Russian Revolution. Speer wrote that Rosenberg often stymied Himmlers Empire building plans in the East. Who knows, maybe he was just another crazy nazi occultist, albiet one of mixed ancestry himself. As they say there is none more fervent than the converted.

It has been speculated that Rosenberg was model for the character "Meloch" who lead the Nazi Occult Archeological Team in the Steven Spielberg classic "Raiders of the Lost Ark" who were in a race with "Indiana Jones" to discover the Lost Ark of Covenent.

Another among the many people who may have influenced Adolf Hitler's in the selection of the swastika as a Nazi symbol was Alfred Rosenberg, the "intellectual leader" of the Nazi movement.

Born the son of a poor shoemaker, Alfred Rosenberg's key to his rise to fame among the Nazi leadership was the possession of a manuscript he smuggled from Moscow, The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion . [1] Some claim that he presented the manuscript to Hitler, who saw in it a blueprint to total power.

Rosenberg told a strange story about how the manuscript came to his hands. It is probably that he quickly discovered that it was a forged document. Nevertheless, he also knew that he had in his hands a valuable document, full of racial and political dynamite, which, if used to his advantage, may become the key to his personal success.

Despite some Jewish ancestory, Rosenberg gained access to the Thule Society by showing the Protocols to Rudolf Hess and to Dietrich Eckart, who became wildly excited on reading it. Very soon the Protocols viewed its first German edition. German intellectuals were impressed. Edition followed edition. The book was given away at no cost and widely distributed. French, Polish, and British editions appeared. Then it was published also in America, in Italy, and in Hungary.

After the creation of the Nazi Party, Eckart introduced Rosenberg to Adolf Hitler, and the young Estonian emigré from Russia became an active Party member. In 1930 Rosenberg reached a high point in his career as a Nazi ideologue with the publication of his most important work, The Myth of the 20th Century . According to a review of that time, it was, "with Hitler's Mein Kampf, the most important work on National Socialism. The book eventually became a best seller, and sold more than one million copies.

During the World War II, Rosenberg led an art-looting staff which carried off to Germany more than 21,000 carloads of stolen paintings, rare books, sculptures, and jewelry. Much of this loot found its way into the private collections of Reichmarshall Herman Göering.

Anxious to be in Hitler's good graces, some Nazi leaders, Rosenberg prominently among them, repudiated Christianity completely. Instead, they wanted to set up a pagan cult of "blood, race, and soil." They would go back to the dark ritual of dramatic rites of their ancestors.

The New Pagans resurrected Odin, Thor, and the old gods of primitive Teutons before Christ's time. Instead of the Old Testament they adopted Nordic sagas and fairy tales. They set up a new trinity for worship---bravery , loyalty , and physical force .

They even created a hymn for the new German Faith Movement:

The time of the Cross has gone now,
The Sun-wheel shall arise,
And so, with God, we shall be free at last
And give our people their honor back.

Though Hitler did not openly supported the new paganism, he was not opposed to its ideas. In 1937, he awarded the National Prize, Germany's version of the Nobel Prize, to Alfred Rosenberg, maximum foe of Christianity and leader of the Neo-Pagans. Rosenberg, the White Russian turned into Nazi philosopher, wanted a return to the old Teutonic religion of fire, sword, and swastika.

NOTES:

1. The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion purported to be a record of the proceedings of the Jewish World Congress held in Basel in 1897, at which, it was affirmed, plans were laid towards total world domination by an international Jewish conspiracy.

The Protocols , however, proved to be a hoax. They were the appendix of a work called The Anti-Christ, written by Nilus, a degenerate Russian writer and the protegé of Soloviev, the Russian philosopher.

The Protocols were largely copied from the book of Maurice Joly, Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu , published in 1864. The extraordinary resemblance of the two works could not be accidental, not only whole paragraphs are almost identical, but the various points in the programme follow each other in the same order.

Maurice Joly was a French lawyer, a conservative and a monarchist. He had no intention of writing a secret document; on the contrary, he had in mind a satire against the French emperor, Napoleon III.

The French police soon discovered the author of the anonymous pamphlet, and Joly was sent to prison for fifteen months. His book was published in a second edition and then forgotten. Today scarcely any copies of it can be found.

At the time when Joly published his Dialogues aux Enfers , the secret societies were particularly active and, as people feared that a number of Jews had penetrated their ranks, a whole crop of literary efforts directed against Jews and secret societies marked the decade.

After thirty years of oblivion, however, Joly's great day came--in Russia. A copy of his book fell in the hands of some agents of the Ochrana, the tsar's secret police. They wanted to scare the tsar and drive him to bloodshed. Using Joly's book as evidence, they persuaded him that the Jews of the whole world had devised a secret conspiracy to achieve domination, first over Russia, then over the whole world.

The superstitious Tsar became frightened. The religious community was concerned by Soloviev's warnings about the imminent coming of the Antichrist. Now Sergei Nilus, one of his disciples, had made the Antichrist a Jew.

(Note the paragraphs below are documented B.S.)
Authors Baigent, Leigh and Lincoln in their "The Holy Blood and Holy Grail", "The Messianic Legacy", and "The Temple and the Lodge" Trilogy say that the "Protocols" was actually based on an authentic document about not the "Jews", but about the mysterious Priory of Sion.

The Prioy of Sion is said to be a Secret Society that was alledgedly behind the Knights Templar, Freemasonry, and Arthurian and Grail Legends who are working towards the restoration of World Kingship for it's "hidden masters". These "hidden masters" are said to be of the Judaic Royal Messianic Bloodline descended from Merovingians, Arcadia, Troy, Jesus, Mary Magdalene, James, the Benjimites and King David who possess "powers" that are seemingly supernatural.

http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/P2.html#L14

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Rienzi, Last of the Roman Tribunes

The opera concerns the life of Cola di Rienzi, a medieval Italian populist figure who succeeds in outwitting and then defeating the nobles and their followers and in raising the power of the people. Magnanimous at first, he is forced by events to crush the nobles' rebellion against the people's power, but popular opinion changes and even the Church, which has earlier urged him to assert himself, turns against him. In the end the populace burns the Capitol, in which Rienzi and a few adherents have made a last stand.

---------

On regarding what Rienzi did, we must look to his means, to the difficulties that surrounded him, to the scantiness of his resources. We see a man without rank, wealth, or friends, raising himself to the head of a popular government in the metropolis of the Church—in the City of the Empire. We see him reject any title save that of a popular magistrate—establish at one stroke a free constitution—a new code of law. We see him first expel, then subdue, the fiercest aristocracy in Europe—conquer the most stubborn banditti, rule impartially the most turbulent people, embruted by the violence, and sunk in the corruption of centuries. We see him restore trade—establish order—create civilization as by a miracle—receive from crowned heads homage and congratulation—outwit, conciliate, or awe, the wiliest priesthood of the Papal Diplomacy—and raise his native city at once to sudden yet acknowledged eminence over every other state, its superior in arts, wealth, and civilization;—we ask what errors we are to weigh in the opposite balance, and we find an unnecessary ostentation, a fanatical extravagance, and a certain insolent sternness. But what are such offences—what the splendour of a banquet, or the ceremony of Knighthood, or a few arrogant words, compared with the vices of almost every prince who was his contemporary? This is the way to judge character: we must compare men with men, and not with ideals of what men should be. We look to the amazing benefits Rienzi conferred upon his country. We ask his means, and see but his own abilities. His treasury becomes impoverished—his enemies revolt—the Church takes advantage of his weakness—he is excommunicated—the soldiers refuse to fight—the People refuse to assist—the Barons ravage the country—the ways are closed, the provisions are cut off from Rome. ("Allora le strade furo chiuse, li massari de la terre non portavano grano, ogni die nasceva nuovo rumore."—"Vita di Cola di Rienzi", lib. i. cap. 37.) A handful of banditti enter the city—Rienzi proposes to resist them—the People desert—he abdicates. Rapine, Famine, Massacre, ensue—they who deserted regret, repent—yet he is still unassisted, alone—now an exile, now a prisoner, his own genius saves him from every peril, and restores him to greatness. He returns, the Pope's Legate refuses him arms—the People refuse him money. He re-establishes law and order, expels the tyrants, renounces his former faults (this, the second period of his power, has been represented by Gibbon and others as that of his principal faults, and he is evidently at this time no favourite with his contemporaneous biographer; but looking to what he did, we find amazing dexterity, prudence, and energy in the most difficult crisis, and none of his earlier faults. It is true, that he does not shew the same brilliant extravagance which, I suspect, dazzled his contemporaries, more than his sounder qualities; but we find that in a few weeks he had conquered all his powerful enemies—that his eloquence was as great as ever—his promptitude greater—his diligence indefatigable—his foresight unslumbering. "He alone," says the biographer, "carried on the affairs of Rome, but his officials were slothful and cold." This too, tortured by a painful disease—already—though yet young—broken and infirm. The only charges against him, as Senator, were the deaths of Montreal and Pandulfo di Guido, the imposition of the gabelle, and the renunciation of his former habits of rigid abstinence, for indulgence in wine and feasting. Of the first charges, the reader has already been enabled to form a judgment. To the last, alas! the reader must extend indulgence, and for it he may find excuse. We must compassionate even more than condemn the man to whom excitement has become nature, and who resorts to the physical stimulus or the momentary Lethe, when the mental exhilarations of hope, youth, and glory, begin to desert him. His alleged intemperance, however, which the Romans (a peculiarly sober people) might perhaps exaggerate, and for which he gave the excuse of a thirst produced by disease contracted in the dungeon of Avignon—evidently and confessedly did not in the least diminish his attention to business, which, according to his biographer, was at that time greater than ever.)—is prudent, wary, provident—reigns a few weeks—taxes the People, in support of the People, and is torn to pieces! One day of the rule that followed is sufficient to vindicate his reign and avenge his memory—and for centuries afterwards, whenever that wretched and degenerate populace dreamed of glory or sighed for justice, they recalled the bright vision of their own victim, and deplored the fate of Cola di Rienzi. That he was not a tyrant is clear in this—when he was dead, he was bitterly regretted. The People never regret a tyrant! From the unpopularity that springs from other faults there is often a re-action; but there is no re-action in the populace towards their betrayor or oppressor. A thousand biographies cannot decide upon the faults or merits of a ruler like the one fact, whether he is beloved or hated ten years after he is dead. But if the ruler has been murdered by the People, and is then regretted by them, their repentance is his acquittal.

I have said that the moral of the Tribune's life, and of this fiction, is not the stale and unprofitable moral that warns the ambition of an individual:—More vast, more solemn, and more useful, it addresses itself to nations. If I judge not erringly, it proclaims that, to be great and free, a People must trust not to individuals but themselves—that there is no sudden leap from servitude to liberty—that it is to institutions, not to men, for they must look for reforms that last beyond the hour—that their own passions are the real despots they should subdue, their own reason the true regenerator of abuses. With a calm and a noble people, the individual ambition of a citizen can never effect evil:—to be impatient of chains, is not to be worthy of freedom—to murder a magistrate is not to ameliorate the laws. (Rienzi was murdered because the Romans had been in the habit of murdering whenever they were displeased. They had, very shortly before, stoned one magistrate, and torn to pieces another. By the same causes and the same career a People may be made to resemble the bravo whose hand wanders to his knife at the smallest affront, and if today he poniards the enemy who assaults him, tomorrow he strikes the friend who would restrain.) The People write their own condemnation whenever they use characters of blood; and theirs alone the madness and the crime, if they crown a tyrant or butcher a victim.

[Mac Seafraidh]

Hitler's paternal grandfather was most likely one of the brothers Johann Georg Hiedler or Johann Nepomuk Hiedler. There were rumors that Hitler was one-quarter Jewish and that his grandmother, Maria Schicklgruber, became pregnant while working as a servant in a Jewish household. The implications of these rumors were politically explosive for the proponent of a racist and antisemitic ideology. Opponents tried to prove that Hitler had Jewish or Czech ancestors. Although these rumors were never confirmed, for Hitler they were reason enough to conceal his origins. According to Robert G. L. Waite in The Psychopathic God: Adolf Hitler, Hitler made it illegal for German women to work in Jewish households, and after the "Anschluss" (annexation) of Austria, Hitler turned his father's hometown into an artillery practice area. Waite says that Hitler's insecurities in this regard may have been more important than whether Judaic ancestry could have been proven by his peers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Here's what I'm trying to pull together.

Hypothesis so far from Jim Condit, my readings, and Joseph Farrell:

1. Hitler was a genuine, Austrian born, Pan-German nationalist.  He, as well as many others, wanted to unify the German people with "Germany".
2. Hitler lived according to his ideals which were sometimes not in touch with reality. This can be good and bad. Early National Socialism was founded on works by Theosophists like Bellamy.  Hitler, like many Goy Germans, lived, fought and suffered as Germany lost the war, went bankrupt, and starved.  
3. At some point during Hitlers early political career, Industrialists, Zionists and International Bankers-Investors saw a future Nazi Germany as politically useful. Hitler's Nationalist and racialist program was allowed to continue and even encouraged. Funds were provided and deals were made by players like IBM, Prescott Bush, Thyssen, Ford, LIndbergh, and other Fascist minded people. A lot of people were sick of the loose morals, financial ruin, and decadence of Weimar Germany.
4. While a rigid Propaganda ministry pushed a "German only" Germany racially, the actual practice of it was not as strict as is commonly believed.  Half-Jews and other mischlings seen as useful had some unseen influence.
5.  While most German people responded favorably to the Nazi program, the long term purpose of Hitler's Financial and Industrial supporters was to set the stage for the creation of the nation of Israel. What leads me to this belief?
5a. After the war, many Nazis were allowed to flee to Argentina. They were assisted in this endeavor by the Jewish, future CIA Chief, OSS agent James Jesus Angleton who provided them with new identities such as Gerlach.  
5b. Angleton created the  Mossad in the late 1940s and early 1950s.
5c. Holohoax propaganda was created by US intelligence to aid the foundation of Israel.
5d. Without WWII, Europeans and Americans would not have created the UN nor would have promoted the founding of the nation of Israel.
5e. The War brought Zionist to the political fore in FDR's cabinent and in ChurchHill's regime.
5f.  Brettonwoods would not have been started, which in peacetime, gave the Jew Fed a lot of money to support Israel.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

continued... (sorry to jump around so much as this is developing)...

6. As a side show to all of the actual fighting, killing and suffering, was the growth of intelligence agencies and weapons programs. The power and scope of the largely Govt. funded programs could not have been accomplished in peace time. Wonder weapons along with the invention of the A-Bomb on both sides, would not only decide the outcome of the war, but would be eventually the "big sticks" to beat down genuine Nationalist movements in Europe and the Middle East.

7. The ultimate outcome of the intelligence battles was the formation of a global Jewish Intelligence network that could shape events in Europe, Russia, the Middle East and the USA.  Asia, S. America and Africa were influenced to degree by these agencies.  Only by sharing intelligence globally, could the Jews stop true "Napoleons" that wandered off the reservation like Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini.  Active compartmentalizing based up the MI5-6, Nazi and Soviet models would follow.  The only persons allowed to see the true picture were Jews in Russia, Britian and the USA. Every nation is now corruptable, every leader can be taken out, every resistance can be destroyed.  Stalin had stopped Jewish groups in Russia from taking him out in 1938 but he eventually overreached and they got him. Patton was likely killed by an OSS Lebanese Jew for overreaching his role. Kennedy was taken out later but for similar reasons.  

8. The Space programs and Cold War would be intended for solidifying the Jewish state. Joseph P. Farrell has some interesting research in this regard, but he points fingers at the "Nazis", "Wallstreet", and "Vatican" (like A.J. ) as the scary bad guys running it all in the background. Still, his reports on German weapon technology are likely actual and he does help connect the real "Jewish hidden hands" acting behind the scenes in the NASA program, CIA, KGB and Russian space race.  Many "secrets" of the Nazis were actually pirated away by agents like "Maxwell" after the war for G.B., Israel and the USA.
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/20 ... 70415.html
http://www.redicecreationsfilm.com/radi ... arrell.mp3

9. Muslim nationalism went entirely off the farm by players like Nassar in Egypt. It is still off the farm today but it has been infiltrated successfully enough to not threaten Israel any longer. Soviets supported the Syrians and the US supported Israel during the Cold war. This long Cold War battle was intended to weaken nationalism, simple traditions, and religion globally.

10. Soviet Zionist Jews in the 1970s began the destruction of the Soviet Union with their Zionist movements. Zionism killed Marxism after it had served its useful purpose for 130 years - remove Kingships and Church power with revolutions.

[Mac Seafraidh]

Alfred Rosenberg was not a Jew. The Jew can commonly hold the name Rosenberg and this is just one example. I will have you know that many Swedish surnames have "berg" as a suffix.

Some of these links are just off the wall, blatant lies.

The Jews enjoy division between those who are out to solve the Jewish problem. I do not understand the importance in trying to find as much Jew blood as possible in a great German National Socialist state. It is next to nothing.

I was talking to Joe and Ognir yesterday about how Germany was not 100 percent German, hence their best grand prix racecar driver Rudolf Caracciola. I cannot stand when people call Hitler "Austrian" though because it was German land known as Ostmark.