Forum and blog tactics

[active_indolent]

I was thinking on discussing tactics to get a upper hand in forum (and to some extent blogs). How to get around the anti-semte stamp and so on.

Here´s my suggestion.:
I´v been noticing that when you get into a discussion concerning  jews in a forum you always end up debating with a jew pretending to be a a gentile. He or she gets an upper hand  then by calling you an "anti-semite" and so on. Since he or she pretends to be a gentile they also show the "real gentiles" that you are not allowed to do that.

Now lets reverse it and you pretend to be a jew (taking a jewish alias) who are filled with agony and disgust over the jews (sort of Bobby Fisher like). That would put you with an upperhand and the jew pretending to be a gentile in a weak position. He can´t claim that he has a interpretation precedence, and he can´t pull the old anti-semite ploy. The outcome would probable be that he changes nick and becomes a real jew in order to get  interpretation precedence. But then the table would be reversed and you could play around with him (doing what they allways do: not giving answers to questions or make historical claims out of context etc).

The same could be done with blogs. Setting up blogs pretending to be jews would also lead to a  interpretation precedence.

Has anybody tried this? And what was the outcome in such case.

Do you have other methods that you would like to share?

[memory hole]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbfivelive/F2148565

go for it, plenty of scope here, very pro Israel and war on terror, stange perverse views........opposition is already there.

[active_indolent]

Thanks!
 Seems like a real shit hole!Should have been fun!
But I´ll test it on a forum in my native langauge, Swedish. Why don´t you give it a try on the BBC forum and I test a Swedish forum? Could be fun exchanging experiences.

[high_treason]

Well I've been having a private debate with a Russian Jew (Ashknazi) on YouTube, to my surprize he wasn't hostile and didn't use any name calling. . I gave him several links to Jack Bernstein, Gilad Atzmon, Israel Shahak, Israel Shamir plus a few stories about the "self inflicted wounds" by Jews painting Swastikas and threatening other Jews. He said he would look in to the information because it was the first time for him to hear about it even the 100,000 Jewish soldiers of the Nazis and the heads of Neonazi groups and KKK being Jewish. So I'm waiting for what he has to say, hopefully we could have more Jews fighting the criminal bankers.

The strategy that I used was:

A- Put something that would guarantee a response:

Putting something that would guarantee a response, would also work to filter the 13 year old keyboard commandos from the ones who actually don't know what is going on. The first one will resort to the usual name calling and stupid responses while the later will try to debate you.

B - Once you get to the debate, be respectful and civil in your conversation, keep it as a private conversation because it keeps out any interference. Be prepared to get the Anti-Semite response but and refute it. You can use a lot of examples...for instance...Ashknazi use Yiddish which is not a Semitic language, Jews are as different as any nation and cannot possibly belong to one group since you have different races which practice Judiasm (Flasha, Ashknazi, Sephardic, Samaritan) and my personal favorite its a language group and you can't be anti-language.

C - Use solid facts backed up by mainstream, academic and/or Jewish sources. For instance in this last debate I gave a link with Hitler's Jewish soldiers and backed it up by sources from Universities. Also Nazi-zionist alliance backed up from the Jewsagainstzionism website. Because such evidence is hard to refute and many Jews really don't know what is going on, they have been brainwashed just like many other people, so use as much historical facts as possible. These facts seem to open their eyes to things they didn't know.

D - Most importantly don't generalize, because first its not true that all Jews are on it and second it makes you look dumb. Be specific, for me I use Jewish criminal bankers and Jewish leadership (ADL, Bni Brith, ZOA and so on). It also helps to mention those whom they ally with like the zionist Christians and other greedy and compromised goyim.

E - Finally drop a few links to other Jews who are fighting the criminals people like Gilad Atzmon, Israel Shamir, Jack Bernstein.

[active_indolent]

Great approach!
It´s good to have them written down so you don´t fall back to anger and name calling (it´s easy to be carried away by your feelings).
Thanks for a constructive and practical approach

By the way, you mentioned references to universities and other sources that are hard to dispute.  Perhaps it would be a good idea to make a thread with indisputable facts as reference where a novice like my can use as reference and perhaps ask questions to more informed members (as you). I came upon the jews rather recently and even though I´m been listening to most of DBS, read Bernstein etc I find that DSB seldom have a note system referencing to indisputable sources. I got a fairly good grip on the moneyatry system (thats how I stumbled upon them) but I would surly need some help in other areas when discussing on forum. So what I´m suggesting is some sort of support thread .