Jon Stewart DEMOLISHES Jim Cramer! Naked Shorting/manipulation mentioned!!! MUST WATCH!

[MikeWB]

This is an awesome exchange and CNBC and John Cramer have been exposed for what they are: stock pushing snake oil salesmen!

Spread this around! Even people with NO knowledge will understand that they've been had!

USA Link: http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index ... ew-outtake

Canada: http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/the-da ... clip147737

[GordZilla]

This is an awesome exchange and CNBC and John Cramer have been exposed for what they are: stock pushing snake oil salesmen!

Spread this around! Even people with NO knowledge will understand that they've been had!

USA Link: http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index ... ew-outtake

Canada: http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/the-da ... clip147737

The best part about it is when John says "you guys act like you dont know " meanwhile HE'S DOING THE EXACT SAME THING !! ... the whole thing is a show designed to make the audiance feel good , like "there,  we got one of the bastards! "  but make no mistake John Stewart is just as guilty, or more likely more guilty than Cramer. They both sell nothing but lies and both know it...
 John is just higher up on the totem pole, he gets to expose Cramer (by design) but who exposes him? He acts all sincere in his anger when he's attacking Cramer and then shakes his hand at the end ...it's all STAGED BULLCRAP.

[veritasvincit]

It is absolutely staged.............................  Jon does demolish Cramer throughout the intervew and exposes him as a liar but then totally contradicts his stance in the last 3 minutes by kissing Cramer's butt and confirming that it really isn't Cramer's fault and that the upstanding CNBC jew media has a responsibility to ensure that people are being told the truth.  Jon makes himself look like the hero from the beginning,  he then recruits Cramer to his hero team and thank God that CNBC enabled Jon to expose such lies and atrocities.  Such manipulation!

[scooby]

It is absolutely staged.............................  Jon does demolish Cramer throughout the intervew and exposes him as a liar but then totally contradicts his stance in the last 3 minutes by kissing Cramer's butt and confirming that it really isn't Cramer's fault and that the upstanding CNBC jew media has a responsibility to ensure that people are being told the truth.  Jon makes himself look like the hero from the beginning,  he then recruits Cramer to his hero team and thank God that CNBC enabled Jon to expose such lies and atrocities.  Such manipulation!

Stewart always gives that sewer rat Bill Kristol a big hearty handshake after their interviews, too.

We're being exactly programmed to accept being ass-raped by jews.

[MikeWB]

Staged? Yeah, tell that to Jim Cramer whose career is now in the shitter.

If this was 100% staged, this would have been a soft attack.. a slap on the wrist. The end result of this one was an exposure of the CNBC for what it is: infomercial for Wall Street. And Cramer didn't counter that at all.

[scooby]

Staged? Yeah, tell that to Jim Cramer whose career is now in the shitter.

If this was 100% staged, this would have been a soft attack.. a slap on the wrist. The end result of this one was an exposure of the CNBC for what it is: infomercial for Wall Street. And Cramer didn't counter that at all.

http://sparklepony.blogspot.com/2009/03/baloney.html

You know what kept distracting me? Cramer's rolled-up shirt sleeves. This is a deeply phony, insincere person. The sleeves in this setting are so pointless, so exaggerated, so incongruous, that you really have to ask what it all means. This is clearly symbolic dress.

Here's my interpretation: Cramer is under fire for being too chummy with those he is pretending to cover. Stewart, especially, has accused him and CNBC of pandering to the Wall Street crowd instead of truly reporting on them. Rather than giving real advice to consumers, in other words, they're playing cocktail party with corporate interests.

So to set himself apart from the super-rich bankers and brokers, Jim's lost the sport coat (which he was surely wearing before the cameras rolled) and rolled up the sleeves to present the illusion that he's a "regular working man." He's a laborer! A serious let's-get-down-to-brass-tacks, problem-solving guy! He's not a Wall Street crony, he's A Man of the People!

Except he's not. He's a TV host. And a phony who gave a lot of bad advice which cost everybody but him and his real peers lots of money. John Stewart was right: Fuck you, Jim Cramer.

[GordZilla]

Staged? Yeah, tell that to Jim Cramer whose career is now in the shitter.

If this was 100% staged, this would have been a soft attack.. a slap on the wrist. The end result of this one was an exposure of the CNBC for what it is: infomercial for Wall Street. And Cramer didn't counter that at all.

 He's not ruined , he'll still get plenty of play . And even if he is ruined,  it's by designed and he'll be compensated for it as well. Look at George W , he's been smeared far and wide, is he ruined ? Is his career over? Even as one of the most hated men alive he is currently making speaking engagements and still rolling in the bucks.

All Staged, no question about it.

If John didn't attack him , that would raise suspicion. But before the first night, where John first engaged Mr. Cramer, the script was already written... probably went something like this "Look the public needs to see someone fry for this , Let's call Cramer we'll offer him this that and the other thing, see if John can use him for a target."

Think of all the legitimate 'targets' John could go after, yet never does.

If they are on TV , whether to be smeared like David Duke, or praised like Obama, they are pawns who willingly play their respective parts.  

If you buy into any of this then I cannot help you, but there is no honesty what so ever to be found on the idiot box. None.

[MikeWB]

Staged? Yeah, tell that to Jim Cramer whose career is now in the shitter.

If this was 100% staged, this would have been a soft attack.. a slap on the wrist. The end result of this one was an exposure of the CNBC for what it is: infomercial for Wall Street. And Cramer didn't counter that at all.

 He's not ruined , he'll still get plenty of play . And even if he is ruined,  it's by designed and he'll be compensated for it as well. Look at George W , he's been smeared far and wide, is he ruined ? Is his career over? Even as one of the most hated men alive he is currently making speaking engagements and still rolling in the bucks.

All Staged, no question about it.

If John didn't attack him , that would raise suspicion. But before the first night, where John first engaged Mr. Cramer, the script was already written... probably went something like this "Look the public needs to see someone fry for this , Let's call Cramer we'll offer him this that and the other thing, see if John can use him for a target."

Think of all the legitimate 'targets' John could go after, yet never does.

If they are on TV , whether to be smeared like David Duke, or praised like Obama, they are pawns who willingly play their respective parts.  

If you buy into any of this then I cannot help you, but there is no honesty what so ever to be found on the idiot box. None.

I guess Tucker Carlson's feud with Stewart was staged as well? Where's Tucker these days btw?

Cramer's on the same path: path to irrelevance. Who will listen to his advice now after all this mess? WHo will be stupid enough to take his stock picks? Didn't attack him? Have you watched TDS this week? He told him  "FUCK YOU" twice and exposed how he admitted MANIPULATING stock while ADMITTING that it's illegal. Cramer did this in 2006 and still SEC has done nothing. Stewart exposed t again.

NO OTHER TV SHOW WOULD HAVE DONE WHAT STEWART HAS DONE! NONE! Which other TV channel has shown people how these scum manipulate stock and naked short it?

No way this was staged.

Watch the scum explain & BRAG how hedge funds manipulate the market (and how he did it):

[youtube:2xtprinz]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfC0mE9eVb4[/youtube]2xtprinz]

[GordZilla]

Yeah still stage, hell it's scripted and performed on a stage . Maybe Cramer pissed someone off to have this set up in the first place, but none-the-less ANY publicity is good publicity.

 If John really cared with the same passion he acted out last night, don't you think more heads would roll? More would be attacked for their blatant crimes, by this hero John Stewart?

 If his passion was real, he wouldn't shake his hand and congratulate him at the end of the interview. If he sincerely felt as he portrayed his feelings to be... he wouldn't even want him on his stage except to PHYSICALLY attack him, as many would  who actually lost huge sums of money  (their life's work!) thanks to this jackass. It was way to cordial, way too proper... way too full of shit!

 WB , you never cease to surprise me. There is nothing to that piece but reassurance to the uninitiated goy that their media heroes are indeed on their side.

Cramer got more attention this week then in years, and all those that dislike John Stewart,  -commonly referred to as the 'Christian right' although more aptly it should be referred to as 'the brain washed Zio Christians"- will now hold Cramer in an even higher light. It's a two way street especially  when the media has already divided America into the fictional 'right' and 'left'. It's also a win-win situation for the both of them. They knew this before hand, not all of America is in love with John Stewart, and most certainly not all are in love with Cramer, but now almost certainly the undecided about either of them will now have picked sides.... The numbers? Well they won't change much.  Stewart will still have his audience (apparently yourself included) and Cramer will still have his.

As for Tucker?  He's still around and still has much more wealth then us average bums. Do you think he's off in a corner crying somewhere? No I doubt it, probably sniffing coke of his BMW's dash while having some high priced hookers fondle his balls.  In his mind, he lost nothing. And nor did Cramer.

IT'S STAGED, AS WITH EVERYTHING ON TV.

[§N9sh2bj]

I'm with GordZilla on this one. Jews visa vi organizations like B'nai B'rith, have been manipulating the world of the Goy for centuries.  As another poster pointed out, the manipulation is so strong it's a meme; they do not need a formal organization to do it. What does this mean? Acting. Manipulation - on the spot.

Television is literature for the illiterate.

[jai_mann]

This is an awesome exchange and CNBC and John Cramer have been exposed for what they are: stock pushing snake oil salesmen!

Spread this around! Even people with NO knowledge will understand that they've been had!

USA Link: http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index ... ew-outtake

Canada: http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/the-da ... clip147737

The best part about it is when John says "you guys act like you dont know " meanwhile HE'S DOING THE EXACT SAME THING !! ... the whole thing is a show designed to make the audiance feel good , like "there,  we got one of the bastards! "  but make no mistake John Stewart is just as guilty, or more likely more guilty than Cramer. They both sell nothing but lies and both know it...
 John is just higher up on the totem pole, he gets to expose Cramer (by design) but who exposes him? He acts all sincere in his anger when he's attacking Cramer and then shakes his hand at the end ...it's all STAGED BULLCRAP.

Very well stated. I just wanted to see Stewart hung for the propagandist he is when I saw his interviews with the Joker, Bill Kristol. I wonder what Dave Chappelle was witness to behind the scenes there before they tried to milk him for all his talent?

[MikeWB]

So who staged it? What did they offer Jim Cramer to go along with it? Reduced prison sentence?!

BTW, http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/nbc ... 111307.asp

That staged from the start too?

[Rockclimber]

What a disingenuous guy that Kramer is. He is such a typical khazar, arrogant, won't admit he did anything wrong- finger pointing everywhere else. He's calling for indictments? Great, start with yourself! This man is a psychopath, he doesn't even look a slight bit contrite about this mess.

[MikeWB]

Scott, check this out:

The Jim Cramer Indictment: Five More Counts

Jim Cramer knows how easy CNBC is to fool. He used to play the network himself. Here are five episodes from the stock speculator's past that could use some dusting off.

Cramer avoided any career-ending gaffes on the Daily Show last night — like say, "when a performing monkey pundit does it that means that it is not illegal!" — but the extended drubbing and his squishy apologetic demeanor is a reminder that his 30-year-long career — as a trader, as a dot-com entrepreneur, and now as a screaming cable personality — has been little more than a running series of scandals and contretemps, rife with evidence that the TV personality has long made a habit of using his media profile for personal enrichment. The Stewart dust-up is far from the first time Cramer has run up against allegations of ethical misconduct. Here's the tangled history:

1. Stock-Picking at SmartMoney
In 1995, Cramer mentioned four stocks as good buys in his SmartMoney column, mentioning that he had a stake in one of them. In fact, his firm Cramer & Co. owned shares in all four, including 10 percent stakes in two of them. All four stocks shot up in value after the column ran. The SEC launched an informal investigation, and Dow Jones, which owned SmartMoney, announced a new ethics policy to prevent columnists from writing about securities they own. The magazine eventually took the blame for leaving out the disclosure. Two years later, Cramer told CNN that the episode "turned my life upside down... I now mention to everybody in the press because it could happen again; I don't want it to... It was a horrible incident. I live with it every day." Lesson learned!

2. Shorting WavePhone
In 1998, while co-hosting Squawk Box, Cramer said out loud on television that, prior to interviewing the CEO of a company called WavePhone that morning, he had shorted 25,000 shares of the company because he thought it was overvalued. Later in the same show, he went after the CEO, and WavePhone's stock dropped 38 percent, making Cramer slightly richer. He later claimed that it had been "a terrible choice of words" to say, "I called my stock-loan department and said, 'Listen, I want to short 25,000 WavePhore because I think this thing is a big speculative bubble." In fact, he said, he was just curious if anyone else was shorting the company. CNBC suspended him and the SEC investigated, but found no wrongdoing.

3. Trading With the Enemy
In 2002, Nicholas Maier, who worked as a Cramer & Co. trader for five years, published a tell-all detailing Cramer's manipulation of his pals in the financial media for fast profit: Acquire exclusive intelligence on a stock, take a position on that stock, and then leak the intel to CNBC. "Jim's strategy was to put in an order to buy a stock...and then dial Maria [Bartiromo]," Maier wrote. "As soon as she announced the news on television, the stock would often jump.... We weren't just using the news, but making it. No sooner would Maria be thanking us for the help than we'd be getting a payback—a quick hit thanks to our friends at CNBC."





4. SEC Subpoeanas
In 2006, both Cramer and TheStreet.com were served with subpoenas by the SEC in an investigation into collusion between stock analysts and short-sellers. According to, um, TheStreet.com, the SEC was looking into allegations that "Gradient Analytics, an Arizona stock-research firm, published bearish research reports at the behest of a group of short-sellers, including Rocker Partners, a minority owner of TheStreet.com." The subpoenas were never enforced after the SEC backed down, but such a scheme might involve Rocker Partners ordering up some negative intel on a stock, shorting that stock, and then leaking the negative intel to their friends over at TheStreet.com, profiting nicely when the news breaks.

5. Short-Selling
Oddly enough, Cramer outlined just such a scheme in the 2006 interview with TheStreet.com cited frequently by Stewart last night. If his hedge fund was short on a stock (he used Research in Motion as an example) and needed it to go down, he said, "it's really important to get the Pisani's of the world"—that would be CNBC's Bob Pisani—"talking about it as if there's something wrong with RIM. Then you call the bozo at the Journal who's a reporter on Research in Motion and you would feed that Palm's got a killer that it's going to give away." It works with Apple, too: "Apple, it's very important to spread the rumor that both Verizon and AT&T have decided don't like the phone, and that it's not going to be ready for MacWorld. And this is a very easy one to do because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim that it's credible because you spoke to someone at Apple, because Apple doesn't talk."

Sounds familiar!

Can you imagine that this SCUMBAG is still walking free?

[§N9sh2bj]

Quote, from MikeWB
Can you imagine that this SCUMBAG is still walking free? & So who staged it?
Unquote.

They eat their young, Mike. I did not see the interview between these two ACTORS*, monkeys on a stage, with bananas in hand, hopping about. As like supposedly a number of very jewish investors (actors) lost money - currency, not real money - on bernie, another very jewish jew, this is no different than many of their scams where it's a fight between multiple camps of their own so-called community. They will and do, poison their own people. Once I had seen television for what it is, the jew-box, it is all the same bullshit by all the same narrow-minded manipulative materialistic small dicked & insecure people. All about hypnotizing the goy and using those then so hypnotized, like a club to beat whomever they want over the head.

* Nor do I want to expose my precious resource, my mind, to such garbage.

[MikeWB]

Quote, from MikeWB
Can you imagine that this SCUMBAG is still walking free? & So who staged it?
Unquote.

They eat their young, Mike. I did not see the interview between these two ACTORS*, monkeys on a stage, with bananas in hand, hopping about. As like supposedly a number of very jewish investors (actors) lost money - currency, not real money - on bernie, another very jewish jew, this is no different than many of their scams where it's a fight between multiple camps of their own so-called community. They will and do, poison their own people. Once I had seen television for what it is, the jew-box, it is all the same bullshit by all the same narrow-minded manipulative materialistic small dicked & insecure people. All about hypnotizing the goy and using those then so hypnotized, like a club to beat whomever they want over the head.

* Nor do I want to expose my precious resource, my mind, to such garbage.

SO what was the purpose of this staged act? To expose them? Sorry, it makes no sense.

[MikeWB]

More on Jim Cramer... this is an amazing article by none other than PATRICK BYRNE!

http://www.deepcapture.com/jim-cramer-i ... cated-man/

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Crack_smoke_republican Cramer
Looking for Crack_smoke_republican Cramer?

Crack Smoke Republican Cramer
Shop for Crack Smoke Republican Cramer, and deals on tons of other products at MonsterMarketplace.

 

http://rarestnews-v1.s3.amazonaws.com/w ... 14059.html

Credit Market Dislocation
By: atheo on: 05.08.2007 [01:39 ] (1095 reads)
   
economics

(10702 bytes) [nc]    Print
Excerpt:

August 3 - CNBC (Diana Olick's blog): "They're pulling themselves out of the market to regroup," is what one of my mortgage broker buddies told me on the phone this morning when I asked how in the heck Wells Fargo could raise rates on a 30-year jumbo fixed rate mortgage from 6 7/8% to 8% overnight. A jumbo is anything over $417,000, and given today's home prices, that's going to hit an awful lot of borrowers."

I'm never comfortable with the idea of "yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater." But Jim Cramer already did as much late this afternoon on CNBC. His "we're in Armageddon" tirade (available at CNBC.com) was made moments after Bear Stearns' CFO Samuel Molinaro offered a disconcerting assessment of market conditions during the company's hastily called conference call: "I've been out here for 22 years, and this is as bad as I've seen it in the fixed-income markets." A highly-aroused Mr. Cramer, volunteering to speak on behalf of Wall Street, called for the Fed to aggressively cut rates and "open the discount window."


---
How one jew single-handedly destroyed America
by Econ on 05.08.2007 [03:02 ]    
"... Only months on the job, Alan Greenspan stepped up and assured the markets that the Fed was ready to add liquidity after the '87 stock market crash. The Greenspan Fed acted aggressively during the LTCM crisis..."

This how that evil jew single-handedly destroyed America with too much liquidity and debt.

It was like that evil jew was attempting to cure a heroin addict by prescribing more heroin.

The American public and Wall Street felt good in the short run on Greenscam's debt heroin and they became addicted to debt and no we are beginnig to see the long run ramifications of that ignorant jew.

We are headed to the poor house and a Depression.

All that excess liquidity and excess debt will now have to be purged from the system.

Just look how long it has taken Japan to recover from its asset bubble in 1980's and the US is worse off than Japan with excess debt from the dot.com compounded with the excess debt from housing bubble.

Greenscam created a moral hazard by bailing out Wall Street with liquidity and propping up failed banks and investment companies.

Most of the US banks today are bankrupt with most of their revenue coming from derivatives (proprietary) trading and not traditional lending.

The current liquidity cruch will now flush out these bankrupt banks and investment houses.

It was quite amusing to watch Goldman Sach earning $11 billion in profit from 'proprietary trading' and not producing a single widget that needed to be manufactured, required factories, workers , transportation systems.
or could be exported.

Instead of the letting the banks go under and sending the message that greedy decision making would not be rewarded, Greenscam bailed them out time and time again.

It was quite remarkable, the S&L, LTCM, the Mexican bailout, the Asian Bailout, the Argentinian bailout all flood the market wit excess liquidity that later fueled asset bubbles, the last two being the dot.com and housing.

Americans will now wished they had never heard of that jew as the pending Depression is at hand.

The US doesn't have another asset bubble to inflate and Bennake is now in a state of panic.

He has only two options and none look good.

In the first option Bennake can lower interest rates then watch as the foreign investors propping up the $2 billion a day collapsed US economy flee to the euro.

Bennake can't even think about raising interest rates as all those interest sensitive interest only mortgages would have to be reset worsening his problem.

The second option is the Greenscam option of flooding the market with liquidity and inflating another asset bubble. The problem here is that there is no other asset bubble left to inflate and the US is in a liquidity trap.

There are no profitable projects for the liquidity that would flood into the market.



You don't realize the game is over
by Econ on 05.08.2007 [18:26 ]    
"you have absolutely no fucking clue how the game is played."

Let me know when they find the next asset bubble to pop and make money.

Let's hope it is not Social Security Pensions, a la Enron. LOL

I feel so sorry for the those homeless people who lost their artificially inflated homes to foreclosures just so that the 'elite' can make money inflating and deflating the housing asset bubbles, the one thing propping up the collapsed US economy.

The US is at the tail-end and The game is NOW over.

It is just clueless wonders and functional illiterates like you, who haven't realized it is over.

It is not until you are at the homeless shelter and impoverished will you realize the game has long been over.




Follow event and the put them in proper context
by Econ on 05.08.2007 [18:32 ]    
"...Dream on. A collapsing d0llar is the rest of the flippin world's problem, it certainly isn't Bernie's problem..."

This would explain why Treasury Secretary Paulson was in China last week beginning them not to sell dollars and to buy worthless mortagage.

Why is he in China every week?

He might as well move there permanently, as he will be there every weel begging the Chinese not to dump dollars.




In a state of denial
by Econ on 05.08.2007 [18:40 ]    
You are a complete ignoramus. Nothing you have said on here makes any economic sense at all and you lack any critical thinking ability to put anything in its proper context.

You are a functional illiterate and can only trot out tired cliches you heard on CNBC.

You are just scared that the American dream has now turned into a nightmare as you watch the worthless dollar destroy your prosperity.

America is now looking for a scapegoat to explain its own economic failures brought on by printing up too much worthless dollars that the rest of the world no longer wants, but is slowly reducing their share and exposure to the dollar.

It wasn't Osama who told Greenscam to print up worthless dollars or to outsource all jobs to China and India, leaving the US hollowed out financial house of cards dependent on boom and bust asset bubbles.

If the US didn't care about the dollar, it would have hardly invaded Iraq to steal oil and prop up the dollar.

The problem here is that the strategy failed, further exposing the US military, economic and financial weaknesses.



I side with Econ on this one Tet...
by Crack_Smoke_Republican on 07.08.2007 [03:44 ]    
The USA's economy is a Jews game and so is the USA's politics. This was not always the case.

The destruction of economic stability here will be blamed on Jews, slowly but surely, and they deserve it. It should come as no wide-eye surprise. A slow rage burns for many as they watch the idiots lie each month and fiddle with the macro-controls. There is a general lack of purpose in living a largely debt financed consuming life here in the USA. It is an idiot's game - that only perhaps Charles Dickens could write about: "Shylock's Booyah!". A day will come when you must stand as a true Capitalist or a true Economic Nationalist in the face of a real-deal Jew weal economic crisis here in the USA. Most of world knows this fact and therefore they act quietly and with purpose accordingly. Only on Wallstreet and in the USA's financial communities do you see American idiots braying about "Trading". As a Nationalist I only have disgust at the CNBC'ers. Put a knife in all of them except the Technicians.

http://www.iraq-war.ru/article/137197

[Ognir]

I spend an entire Sunday morning about 2 months ago looking into Cramer piece of shite. Real fuckin scumbag and thestreet.com that he owns

Proves to me that CNBC are doing exactly what they are supposed to be doing, gatekeeping for the elite

[Chargeemquick]

Even the BBC are holding this episode up as some sort of telling off for the spivs:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7946253.stm

"TV clash gets White House talking"
"A fierce debate between two US television show hosts has generated so much buzz that even the White House is talking about it.
Press secretary Robert Gibbs said he had "enjoyed thoroughly" seeing The Daily Show's host Jon Stewart lambasting the business channel CNBC's Jim Cramer.
But he admitted forgetting to email President Obama to remind him to record the show."

As other posters have said,harmless theatre for the sheeple to believe in.

[GordZilla]

SO what was the purpose of this staged act? To expose them? Sorry, it makes no sense.

The purpose is to make the audience feel that there are good people , like our hero John, looking after their best interests. It would be too obvious eventually to people that MSNBC, amongst others, we're in cahoots with the banks, Crammer as a fall guy helped re-assure the sheeple that the media is on their side -looking after their best interest. Again, Cramer will be fine, even if his media career is over, he'll be fine. John earns even more trust from his loyal followers. NOTHING happens on TV without it being first staged then screened and filtered. NOTHING!

For them to expose nobody during all these banking crisis would make them look as though they are in on the fraud. This would grow more obvious as more and more banks, investment firms etc crash.  Jim played exactly the roll he was supposed too ...all along, from being an investment 'expert' to being exposed on John's show . He played all his roles as he was supposed to.


Yes the purpose was to 'Expose' them , just doesn't make sense to you, but it would make less sense to the public if nobody was 'exposed', if nobody fried for this, then the sheeple would really start to wonder – and they don't want them to think now do they?

[Roy Hobs]

"Get away with a crime............be a crime fighter."  

It's shocking to hear one of us actually think that the Jew controlled Media can act independently from the script.  

Maybe sometimes we immerse ourselves in this stuff so much that we ourselves can go alittle nutz.  Take a break Mike.  Enjoy the outdoors.  Get away from it for a reprive.

Got to agree with Gordzilla on his premise.  Just another form of the Hegelian dialect.

[MikeWB]

SO what was the purpose of this staged act? To expose them? Sorry, it makes no sense.

The purpose is to make the audience feel that there are good people , like our hero John, looking after their best interests. It would be too obvious eventually to people that MSNBC, amongst others, we're in cahoots with the banks, Crammer as a fall guy helped re-assure the sheeple that the media is on their side -looking after their best interest. Again, Cramer will be fine, even if his media career is over, he'll be fine. John earns even more trust from his loyal followers. NOTHING happens on TV without it being first staged then screened and filtered. NOTHING!

For them to expose nobody during all these banking crisis would make them look as though they are in on the fraud. This would grow more obvious as more and more banks, investment firms etc crash.  Jim played exactly the roll he was supposed too ...all along, from being an investment 'expert' to being exposed on John's show . He played all his roles as he was supposed to.


Yes the purpose was to 'Expose' them , just doesn't make sense to you, but it would make less sense to the public if nobody was 'exposed', if nobody fried for this, then the sheeple would really start to wonder – and they don't want them to think now do they?

You still haven't explained why Cramer would want to destroy his career and his name. Still, makes no sense. He's not an idiot that would be easily manipulated into going to a show not knowing what would happen.

Also, name one other Jew, besides Jon Stewart, that attacked AIPAC on their TV show in prime-time.

You know, not everything is scripted.

[GordZilla]

You still haven't explained why Cramer would want to destroy his career and his name. Still, makes no sense. He's not an idiot that would be easily manipulated into going to a show not knowing what would happen.

Also, name one other Jew, besides Jon Stewart, that attacked AIPAC on their TV show in prime-time.

You know, not everything is scripted.

I never said everything was scripted, I said everything on TV was staged, scripted or filtered ... i.e. there's a purpose for it to be on TV, and it must serve their purposes or it simply will not appear on TV ...even 'live' there is a 7 second delay for exactly that reason (and to bleep language if necessary) ...they do not make mistakes when it comes to what they feed us on the idiot box.

Cramer probably had little choice, as bad as this 'exposé' may appear, to him it could be much less damaging then something else they may be holding over his head. (i.e. blackmail, I'm not sure  .. .just suggesting)  What I know for sure is what I stated above.

John can't ignore issues that are becoming obvious, the same way Alex Jones cannot, but both will down play them and distract from the core of the issues and by all means possible.

I can't comment on the AIPAC bit John might have talked about, I never heard it ... I don't watch TV. I can almost guarantee his comment was nothing like;  "AIPAC is simply un-American , damaging to our collective well being and should be removed, by force if necessary .."  I'm sure it was minor to say the least, whatever John might have said about AIPAC, and probably only talked about because AIPAC surfaced in the media that week. (again he can't simply ignore it, well not too often anyways,  as people might just wake to that.)

Bottom line is this whole show, is nothing more then self promotion, smoke and mirrors, 'there you see? John will get the bad guys" , staged bull shit .

It is meant for Goy to entertain, not us. You should know much better than this by now WB. Cramer is a fall guy, to cover much worse crimes, crimes of people much like John.
Neither of them is worth the snot flicked from a school boy.

[veritasvincit]

"Network" was a movie made in the late 70's about a supposedly deranged TV anchorman played by Peter Finch who lashes out during a broadcast about the deception of the public media.  Sometimes fiction is closer to the truth than we realize.

The movie is posted on Wide Eye Cinema:  http://wideeyecinema.com/?p=982