Understanding Credit, Money and how to get rid of your mortg

[Anonymous]

It gets real interesting around page 124
This is going to change anyones perspective and thereby their life, whoever reads and comprehends what is said here.
http://www.naturalgod.com/NaturalCommerceSupplement.zip

[Anonymous]

Excerpt from the pdf....

The second type of exemption is for every
time you perform on a credit facility through a
licensed financial institution. Every time you qualify
for credit you cause a commensurate (roughly equal)
amount of new money to be issued. And when you
perform your credit payment obligations, you are
entitled to claim possession of that 'money' because
you have actually paid for it with your production.
If this were not true, the only alternative
would mean that when you qualify for credit, the
bank, as agent for the government, issues the money
at no cost to them, yet you must pay it back at full
value plus interest! This could be construed that you
must work hard to produce something so you can sell
that something to make your interest and principal
payments for the credit. You then deliver the
proceeds of the sale of your hard work to the bank,
and then the bank keeps all of that money you give
them (the evidence of your productive performance -
that you paid for with your labour). But the bank
never did contribute or put anything into the
transaction at all, except for their administrative
efforts, and the privilege of using their license to
"print" the original money. Worse, within this
alternative example, the government then must retain
the full outstanding debt (amount owed to you) on its
books!
To make either of the two types of claims
you must have either evidence of surplus income, i.e.,
you have a taxable income to off-set the tax liability
in the first instance, or you must have the
ORIGINAL financial instrument that you granted to
the bank (as credit issuer) in the second instance.
This financial instrument (note, mortgage, etc.) is
evidence of your entitlement to make the claim. It is
proof that you have performed and by extension
therefore, that you own the money that was advanced
into circulation against your promise to so perform.
The bank is only meant and licensed to act as
fiduciary to ensure that when you apply for credit and
thus increase the nation's money supply, that you will
indeed perform by producing value at least equal to
that new money supply. Nothing exists in law or in
fact to justify the bank's taking and keeping
possession of the money that you deliver as evidence
of your performance against a credit facility. This
aspect of their conduct can be nothing but outright
and absolute theft with malice of intent. They know
without any doubt that they contribute nothing of
substance (or of any value, actual or perceived) to the
credit transaction.

[mobes]

I need to dive into this one further.....I wish the common individual knew this before letting a bank foreclose on their property.