Talmud/Zohar/Kabbala "Creation Scenario"

[AntiPharisee]

http://www.fixedearth.com/knowledge%20impact.htm

Star trails tell us what is going on in the universe. What we see and photograph has to be explained by the naturalists with an assumption that the Earth is rotating. This assumption necessitates the further observation-denying reality that the Earth is orbiting the Sun. That assumption in turn demands that the Earth be tilted in its orbit in order to account for the seasons, etc. Assumptions are, by definition, ipso facto not "science" (scire: to know). Accepting the first assumption has several immediate effects: It negates repeated Biblical geocentrism verses and necessitates a non-Biblical explanation for observed phenomena. It elevates a mathematical model which must assume not only that what is seen is not true, but that a reversal of what is seen is true; namely that the Sun is standing still and that the direction of the Moon is reversed and assigned new speeds to answer undeniable phase and eclipse phenomena (which is all answered very nicely by a stationary Earth, thank you). And on it goes until everyone agrees that the Earth is just one example of gravitationally captured flotsam going around a hum-drum star in a universe with billions of galaxies, trillions of stars, billions of other "planets", all billions of light year distant.

What we now KNOW—and what heliocentrists and geocentrists alike are both choosing to ignore—is that every concept in this textbook Big Bang Evolutionary Paradigm (billions of years, relativity, heliocentricity, big bang, expanding universe, and lately, parallel universes and superstrings) constitutes an alternate "creation scenario" derived from the Talmud/Zohar/Kabbala holy books of the ruling Pharisee Sect of Rabbinical Judaism. There is no "secular" science involved between these two models about the Origin of all that exists. Period. The Biblical Creation Model of six literal days with no evolution needed is a Religious Model, AND the Kabbala Creation Model of 15 billion years with evolution needed is a Religious Model.

The indispensable keystone of the Christ-hating, Bible-destroying Pharisee Religion's Big Bang Evolutionary Paradigm is the heliocentricity model. That first assumption of a rotating Earth makes all the rest possible. The Copernican Revolution paved the way for the Darwinian Revolution with its subsequent rationale for the Marxian and Freudian and Einsteinian and Saganian/Gould/Wickramasinghe Revolutions. That historical progression is undeniable, and so is the fraudulent use of technology in telescopes, redshift lies, virtual reality software, etc., which has produced this Pharisee video-game universe disguised as "secular science" now in the textbooks.  

So, rather than continue to split hairs over a "philosophical choice" between geocentrism and heliocentricity, evolution or no evolution, etc., why don't we reduce the whole "Origins"  argument to its inescapable, basic options, viz., the Pharisee Model of the universe, Earth, and mankind based on the Talmud/Zohar/Kabbala...or the Christian Model of the universe, Earth, and mankind based on the Bible??  As all the above are unarguable facts, so is it an admitted fact that the Biblical God Who neither required nor used any evolution whatsoever to create everything in six days cannot be the same as the Pharisee g'd who required and used 15 billion years of evolution. We now know that the Talmud/Kabbala g'd of the Pharisee Religion is Satan HERE. We know that the Bible teaches that Jesus—under the Father's tutelage—is the Creator (Col. 1:16; Eph. 3:9; John 1:3,10; Heb. 1:2.10).  Savior, yes, but Creator too, Who used no evolution. We know that the Talmud teaches that Jesus was a liar, a bastard, and is boiling in feces and semen in hell HERE.  The motivation for the incredible edifice of contra-scientific assumptions inherent in the Pharisee/Kabbalic universe resting on heliocentricity is plain enough. They had Jesus killed once. That didn't work, so they have killed the credibility of the only Book that describes the creation we see everywhere we look.  God is a jealous God who will end Satan's "knowledge" ruling deception of the science falsely so called Evolution Idol.  It is written that there is a "war" which the Lamb wins (Rev. 17:14) which unmasks and causes to Babylon, Satan's empire, to Fall (Rev. 14:8; etc.).  

It is also written that Jesus uses His "called, chosen, and faithful" to win this 2-3 month "war" (Rev. 17:14).  Could there be a greater honor for anyone who professes to love the Biblical God and His Son Jesus than to be one of those called, chosen, and faithful followers??  I, for one, consider that a rhetorical question. But how can it be done?  What can we do? Simple: Forget the hair-splitting.  It's not a philosophic choice.  It's a religious choice.  It's The Bible or the Talmud/Kabbala;  Jehovah God and Jesus or Satan.; Eternal life or eternal death; Real observable science (knowledge, fact) or assumption based pseudo-science (false "knowledge", deception).  

Heliocentricity is the keystone and the Achilles Heel of the entire Satan-inspired Kabbalic universe of 15 billion years of evolution.  It is the #1 assumption upon which the Pharisees have erected their knowledge-controlling deception. The time left for fence-sitting relevant to this demonstrable Achilles Heel of heliocentricity is summed up in Elijah's ancient dictum: "How long halt ye between two opinions? If the LORD be God, follow Him; but if Baal, then follow him" (I Kings 18:21). Marshall Hall

[Wimpy]

In physical cosmology, cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation or just inflation is the theorized exponential expansion of the universe at the end of the grand unification epoch, 10-36 seconds after the Big Bang, driven by a negative-pressure vacuum energy density.[1] The term "inflation" is also used to refer to the hypothesis that inflation occurred, to the theory of inflation, or to the inflationary epoch.

As a direct consequence of this expansion, all of the observable universe originated in a small causally connected region. Inflation answers the classic conundrum of the big bang cosmology: why does the universe appear flat, homogeneous and isotropic in accordance with the cosmological principle when one would expect, on the basis of the physics of the big bang, a highly curved, heterogeneous universe? Inflation also explains the origin of the large-scale structure of the cosmos. Quantum fluctuations in the microscopic inflationary region, magnified to cosmic size, become the seeds for the growth of structure in the universe (see galaxy formation and evolution and structure formation).[2]

Inflation was proposed by Alexei Starobinski[3][4] in the Soviet Union, and simultaneously by Alan Guth[5][6]in the United States. Guth's mechanism is different from Starobinski's, and requires a modification to allow for a graceful exit from inflation. This modification was provided independently by Andrei Linde,[7] and by Andreas Albrecht and Paul Steinhardt.[8]

While the detailed particle physics mechanism responsible for inflation is not known, the basic picture makes a number of predictions that have been confirmed by observation. Inflation is thus now considered part of the standard hot big bang cosmology. The hypothetical particle or field thought to be responsible for inflation is called the inflaton.




If one ponders the newest addition to the Big Bang theory, Inflation, one may soon find themselves staring at the pinnacle of absurdity.

Let's see, at 10 to the minus(- )35 seconds, the universe expands billions of light years, quickly slows down and proceeds to expand at the present rate.  Brought to you by the same people who brought us Einstein with the all known top speed limitation of Light Speed.  In other words, travel at billions of times the speed of light was different, somehow, back in those days.

People get paid tax dollars to come up with this tripe!!

[AntiPharisee]

Wimpy,

Nice one, and again we find Edomites ( "Jews" ) running the Space scam.

Have you seen this?
http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/
Every time you click renew or refresh on your
screen then a new academic "essay" is automatically computer generated.

PS. I think I knew you when I was younger. Is this you?:
 http://toorcon.org/2007/talks/2/wimpy.jpg

[Wimpy]

That's Me!!!!


In my college days these Academic Essays were generated the old fashioned way.  Nothing has changed but the speed.