DBS - Current Audio - Oswald vs. Jackie

Started by AntiPharisee, August 22, 2009, 03:34:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

AntiPharisee

http://theinfounderground.com/archives/ ... e.Play.mp3

I wonder if, going by the words highlighted in red below,
Daryl is implying that the killer was Oswald in the August 21, 2009 audio?

Or he could be saying that Oswald could have proven his innocence and then
investigators would look elsewhere and be more likely to find the real killer.

I think Oswald was just a patsie, I even heard a theory that Zionist
criminals will often use set-up patsies to divert people's attention away from
the real perpetrators of a false flag attack or other major crime.    

I say Daryl Bradford Smith is the first or second
top truthteller on the internet so it amazes me that
other people have not seen this JFK research,
by Neville T. Jones, PhD,
http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm
or have seen it and cannot see that the JFK murder is 100% solved, JFK's wife Jackie was the killer.  

Excerpt of Daryl from Audio
"But the truth is there are a lot of authors out there during the last century and the run-up to the First and Second World War that were describing the conspiracy around them, many of them were either marginalized or arrested such a Ezra Pound who was arrested and placed in a mental institution for speaking these facts, and then you've got this guy Leghorn over  there, of course he's making lies up about who killed Kennedy and saying that there's deathbed confessions, it's such an elaborate hoax that he put together not any different from the hoax he put together on Johnson ordering the USS Liberty attack, this guy has had one deception after another but the one with Kennedy was very clear, he was saying that there were internal machinations within the American government that propelled these people to kill Kennedy, simple fact was and this is what makes the most sense is that just before he was murdered he had sent a letter or correspondence personally from himself to Ben Gurion in Israel demanding an accounting of their nuclear program which he caught wind was quite advanced and they were on their way to making nuclear weapons and Kennedy in no uncertain terms said you will cease and desist and respond to this letter and provide me with the information as to what you're actually doing with this nuclear program, well instead of answering Kennedy's correspondence Ben Gurien stepped down as Prime Minister and leader of Israel. And as he stepped down he knew that he would not have to respond as one State's leader to another because he was no longer in charge of the government. By the time the new leader was in place in Israel, Kennedy was shot dead and everyone with any brain and any amount of research will bring this all back to a Zionist Jewish conspiracy because even Garroway there in New Orleans had all kinds of Jewish people around this including Jack Ruby who ended up shooting Oswald to keep the facts from ever coming out it was a Zionist/Jewish conspiracy from beginning to end."

thirdeyewise

i think it's pretty simple, regardless of who did the actual killing, in the end JACK RUBY (RUBENSTEIN) assured the truth never came out. so yes, all roads
lead right back to these people. even the photograher ( abraham zapruder) who "just happened to be" in the perfect spot to capture the shooting on
film was part of the tribe (Jewish).
One need not be a prophet to be aware of impending dangers. An accidental combination of experience and interest will often reveal events to one man under aspects which few see.

-F.A. Hayek

AntiPharisee

"regardless of who did the actual killing,"

In the last 100 years, from August 22, 1909 to today
August 22, 2009 one of the biggest news stories to ever break
out, is the research piece by Dr. Neville T. Jones,
that Jackie Kennedy was the assassin who killed JFK.

I would say:
"regardless of the undisputable, proven fact that Jackie
killed JFK."

"in the end JACK RUBY (RUBENSTEIN) assured the truth never came out."

... up till Sept 2008 when the truth DID come out:
The bulk of this analysis went live on the Internet on 2nd September 2008:
http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm

CrackSmokeRepublican

We looked over facts on this link:

viewtopic.php?t=1743

From all info that I've seen on this. James Jesus Angleton, the CIA Counter Intelligence Chief and King maker Crypto-Marrano Jew, helped Israel set up its Mossad in the 1950s and he was a master at assassination and diversionary tactics.  He had agents covering Oswald and had a file on Oswald long before JFK's murder.

It is likely he arranged the the Actors, the Middle Story, the Stage, the Setup, the Hit and the Coverup -- all for the protection of his Israel.  He and his officers could have easily stopped the murder if they were working FOR Kennedy but obviously they were working AGAINST him. Angleton had many contacts and contracted agents in the Mediterranean area particularly with Jewish, Italian, Greek and Corsican gangsters -- they had all worked for Angleton when he had a station post in Italy during and after WWII working for the OSS. He worked with Meyer Lansky's crew during WWII.   He also ironically actually helped smuggle a lot of "Nazi" officers to South America during Operation Paperclip.  
Angleton also pioneered methods of doctoring Media.    

Who pulled the trigger? It may be immaterial at this point but likely suspects are the Jewess Jackie either alone or with hired Corsican trigger men.   Contracted Corsican hitmen may have done it alone or with the driver and other hitmen.  Oswald was a patsie but was led to his place in the story by the direction of Angleton.  The Jews in intelligence agencies and in the Jew mobs within the USA, Europe and of course Israel and Soviet Russia -- all coordinated for the hit and coverup after Kennedy had pushed for Algerian Independence and had prevented Israel from acquiring Nukes with their Dimona plant. Jewry wanted Kennedy dead -- not just one but internationally. He could have easily frustrated the Jew plans for the upcoming Arab-Israeli wars and may have even stopped their gambit. American and Soviet Intelligence Jews knew that without opening the USA up in 1965 with Open Immigration, Israeli Jews would not have "Backup Country" to flee to if they lost the upcoming Arab wars. Kennedy's stance on Algeria and the Fed Reserve likely indicated to the colluding Jews that he could not be trusted with the future of Israel. Consequently, he was killed and a malleable corrupt Jew Puppet was put in office.

As an CIA Counter Intelligence Chief, Angleton was able to compartmentalize and create a Byzantine approval system, so that he and a few others could openly work with the Jews in Israel and Russia to secure the future of Israel.  He was a Dual Citizen corrupting the Kennedy investigations -- much of the evidence went to his office before the Senators got it. He knew Cuba, he knew the mob, he had agents with the skills that could arrange the background, build up and hit. Of course, he nearly went crazy in the late 1960s because enough evidence came out that could tie back to his orchestration of the hit and expose him.

He cataloged and took a sinister interest in the details of secretive intelligence undercover killings across the world -- that's sicko Jewish and criminal in my book.  So end of story, he did it, he covered it up - his agency helped doctor the Zapruder film. Jews like Kissinger, Specter and Jew puppets like Ford and Lyndon Johnson were kept in the loop. Kissinger and Ford were close ever after this.  

The fact that the murder of JFK was successful and covered up successfully by Angleton actually probably inspired Cheney, Senior George Bush and Rumsfeld later to allow the Jew-Neocons Hit on 9/11. Cheney and Rumsfeld were in the Ford-Kissinger Administration and were likely well informed of the details. They probably saw how it is better to work with the Israeli power structures supervised by Kissinger than to work for one's "career" outside of it.

The outcome of Angleton's coverup is that several "second narratives" and "off stage actors" could be dragged out in any which way to overlay actual discoveries of evidence. Angleton helped pioneer this -- it is almost Dual-natured and circular Talmudic in reasoning. Like mob hits and cover ups by Jews globally, you can't understand the Kennedy murder without understanding how crypto-Talmudic Angleton made the CIA. Angleton was a poet and playwright -- he knew had to build a good story and took pride in his Jewish Deception.

It's all just Typical Nation Busting, Jew Evil at this point.

Of course Michael Piper is hammering them hard:
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/o ... k_158.html



QuoteAs part of his effort to stop Israel's bomb program, JFK worked behind the back of James Angleton, the CIA's liaison with Israel and a strong pro-Israel partisan. When JFK appointed a new CIA director, friend John McCone, he directed McCone to shut Angleton out of efforts to stop Israel's nuclear weapons program.

Like JFK, Obama forged relationships with billionaire Jewish families closely tied to Israel and to the Jewish organized crime network dubbed "the Supermob" by investigative journalist Gus Russo. A Chicago politician, Obama had to rely on Chicago-based billionaire pro-Israel families—the Crowns and Pritzgers —whose "Supermob" origins Russo outlined in his book Supermob.

But, as the historical record shows, JFK bucked these interests when he became president. JFK captured the White House by narrowly winning a number of states in which the Chicago crime syndicate arranged vote fraud on his behalf. Although legend presents Chicago under the heel of Italian-American gangster Sam Giancana, Giancana's nephew has revealed his uncle was no more than a front man for the real Chicago crime boss, Jewish mobster Hyman Larner, longtime partner of Meyer Lansky, chief of the national Jewish crime syndicate and its "Mafia" elements.

JFK's contact with the Jewish lobby was New York financier Abraham Feinberg, a major fundraiser (along with the Crown family of Chicago) for Israel's nuclear weapons program. Needing critical Jewish money and Jewish votes in the 1960 election, JFK met with Feinberg and other Jewish dollar barons at Feinberg's home. Later, Feinberg and his cronies agreed to come up with $500,000 for JFK. Feinberg later claimed JFK's "voice broke" and that "he got emotional" with gratitude.

However, according to Hersh: "Kennedy was anything but grateful the next morning in describing the session" to Charles Bartlett. Hersh noted that JFK had "driven to Bartlett's home in northwest Washington and dragged his friend on a walk, where he recounted a much different version of the meeting the night before."

"As an American citizen he was outraged," Bartlett recalled, "to have a Zionist group come to him and say: 'We know your campaign is in trouble.We're willing to pay your bills if you'll let us have control of your Middle East policy.' Kennedy . . . also resented the crudity with which he'd been approached."

"They want control," JFK angrily told Bartlett. Hersh added that "Bartlett further recalled Kennedy promising to himself that if he ever did get to be president, he was going to 'do something about it'"—that is, Jewish money dictating American elections and foreign policy.
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

AntiPharisee

"Who pulled the trigger? It may be immaterial at this point but likely suspects are the Jewess Jackie either alone or with hired Corsican trigger men."

I would instead write:
"It's now 100% certain that Jackie pulled the trigger! It is very material that
the Jewess Jackie killed JFK."

CrackSmokeRepublican

She's #1 in my book these days. But they usually don't do these jobs without 2-3 back up fingers on a trigger. Notice the Jew Mobster Mertz:

QuoteA CIA document that was declassified in 1977 reports that a French assassin who belonged to the violent, anti-Kennedy French terrorist organization known as the OAS was in Dallas on the day of the shooting (1:202-209; 19:414-419; 25:95-126). The hitman's name, according to the document, was Jean Soutre. The document mentions that Soutre had also gone by the name of Michel Mertz. It now seems likely that the man was really Michel Mertz using Soutre's name (25:95-172, 267-289). Mertz was a ruthless member of the French Mafia, which had a strong motive to kill Kennedy (25:141-172, 267-289). Mertz and Soutre were enemies. Soutre himself said it was possible that the man described in the document was Mertz using his, Soutre's, name. Within 48 hours of the assassination, the man was picked up in Texas by U.S. authorities and immediately expelled. Interestingly, evidence has surfaced that the FBI was looking for Soutre, or for someone using his name, BEFORE the assassination (25:130-133). We also know that the KGB believed it found evidence that Mertz played a role in the assassination and that he was hired by the French (Corsican/Marseille) Mafia (see below).

The CIA document mentions that Soutre received mail from a dentist named Alderson. The FBI located this individual, Dr. Lawrence Alderson, who had met Soutre while stationed in France as a first lieutenant in the U.S. Army. Dr. Alderson told former Rockefeller Foundation scholar Henry Hurt that the FBI agents who interviewed him informed him that the FBI felt Soutre "had either killed JFK or knew who had done it" (19:418). When he spoke with Hurt, Dr. Alderson produced a snapshot of Soutre that he took when he was stationed in France. To make a long story short, the FBI dropped the ball in the investigation of Soutre and essentially swept the whole thing under the rug.

Why would the Mafia have wanted JFK dead? Quite simply, because the Kennedy administration was threatening the very existence of organized crime in America, and the French Mafia could very well have feared that Kennedy was going to disrupt or halt its lucrative heroin enterprise. Robert Kennedy was waging an unprecedented war on the Mafia, a war that targeted not just Mafia operations but also Mafia leaders themselves.

Another pretty good link but doesn't finger the Jewish Mob:
http://www.geocities.com/mtgriffith1/suspects.htm
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

AntiPharisee

She's #1 in my book these days. But they usually don't do these jobs without 2-3 back up fingers on a trigger. Notice the Jew Mobster Mertz:

I would write instead:
"Nobody has a book where Jackie is number 2 or more since the day she was
exposed as the killer of JFK. If there were any back up fingers that day
they were not needed. Notice the Jewess Mobster Jackie:
www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm

thirdeyewise

you have turned this into a JFK post. did you see the secret service standown video:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY02Qkuc_f8
One need not be a prophet to be aware of impending dangers. An accidental combination of experience and interest will often reveal events to one man under aspects which few see.

-F.A. Hayek

Tomas O'Crohan

People, you've heard of disinfo before, right. I'm surprised this crap keeps coming up after it has been repeatedly shot down. There's a photo out there of Jackie just after the fatal headshot with her face having a look of abject horror. This "author" must be saying that that look was fashioned by an astute actress I guess. Have you read any of the books, looked at any of the evidence, have you examined any of the medical evidence dealing with this crime? If so, you know there is no evidence of any wounds to JFK on the left side, the side that Jackie was sitting on. The fatal headshot entered the RIGHT side of JFK's RIGHT temple above the RIGHT ear, blowing out the back of his head and driving his head BACK and to the LEFT. How does this "author" demonstrate that Jackie did this sitting on JFK's left? He doesn't.

When I fist saw this on DBS's website I though DBS must be a disinfo agent. Then I read the material on his site and listened to his subsequent audios and thought that he's not a disingo agent, however, he is ignorant about the particulars of this, the most heinous of crimes and this POS "author" somehow got thru his bullshit detector. That's my current working hypothesis.

It seems that our biggest job is being able to filter out the nonstop bullshit that is thrown in the path of those who thirst for the truth. This "article" does not comport with any of the medical evidence and must therefore be thrown on the mile-high trash heap of disinfo tripe. DBS should remove it from his website (if it's still there) and not post any JFK material there until he's become familiar with the evidence of that event. Yes, I know, the criminals have filled that inquiry with loads of crap designed to prevent the real facts and therefore the real perps from being known. As I said in January when I first shot down this shiite, we don't need Jackie in order for the Zionist Jews role in this crime to be irrefutably established.

CrackSmokeRepublican

QuoteThis "author" must be saying that that look was fashioned by an astute actress I guess. Have you read any of the books, looked at any of the evidence, have you examined any of the medical evidence dealing with this crime?

Tomas I think Jackie was on a lot of drugs when the shooting occurred. The evidence of the smoke is worth a closer look. If Jackie was really a Jew, I wouldn't have put it past her to pull the trigger. She did have a relationship with the Jew Onassis BEFORE the killing so I think she is suspect. She knew JFK had bedded several women during their marriage so she probably had a personal grudge as well.

There may have been other shooters arranged by Angleton but it looks like she delivered the coup de grace.
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

Tomas O'Crohan

Quote from: "CrackSmokeRepublican"
QuoteThis "author" must be saying that that look was fashioned by an astute actress I guess. Have you read any of the books, looked at any of the evidence, have you examined any of the medical evidence dealing with this crime?

Tomas I think Jackie was on a lot of drugs when the shooting occurred. The evidence of the smoke is worth a closer look. If Jackie was really a Jew, I wouldn't have put it past her to pull the trigger. She did have a relationship with the Jew Onassis BEFORE the killing so I think she is suspect. She knew JFK had bedded several women during their marriage so she probably had a personal grudge as well.

What you say may be so, I've never researched her genealogy, purported drug use or purported prior relationship with "Onassis" (there must have been the usual name change in his history somewhere.) The heart of the matter however is where is the medical evidence of a gunshot wound to JFK caused by a gunman sitting to his immediate left? If someone produces such evidence, we arguably have something to talk about. Without it, this is just one more rabbit hole for people to waste their time on. Have you seen such evidence? I have not.

Am I supposed to give credence to "smoke" that someone has put on a computer screen? If the "smoke" has any legitimacy, i.e., is the effect of the discharge of an unseen handgun, there would be a corresponding wound to the left side of the body would there not? Where is the evidence of a wound caused by a gunman sitting immediately to JFK's left, a gunman who discharged the weapon in such a way that the weapon is never visible? There's the rub you see.

AntiPharisee

"Where is the evidence of a wound caused by a gunman sitting immediately to JFK's left,"

http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm
That JFK was shot at point blank range from the lower left side of his head is also supported by the amount and distribution of blood on JFK's shirt, as photographed from the back,

PHOTO

And from the front,

PHOTO

AntiPharisee

"DBS should remove it from his website (if it's still there)"

I would write:
"If DBS is asked to censor excellent and scholarly scientific research
on major crime exposes, then DBS should become very suspicious
and then should prominently feature the research piece
http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm
at the top of the home page of his website."

Tomas O'Crohan

Quote from: "AntiPharisee""Where is the evidence of a wound caused by a gunman sitting immediately to JFK's left,"

http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm
That JFK was shot at point blank range from the lower left side of his head is also supported by the amount and distribution of blood on JFK's shirt, as photographed from the back,

PHOTO

And from the front,

PHOTO

A link to the propaganda piece does constitute evidence. Show me the head x-ray with a bullet wound to the left side of the head. I've never seen one. Have you? If the claim is that it was a body shot and not a headshot, show me a picture of the body with a left side entrance wound. I've never seen one. Have you? Without such evidence, this is just another one of those the "mafia did it," the "cubans did it," the "secret service driver did it" drivel pieces. Look at the time we've wasted already on "the wife did it." This is the whole object of these propaganda pieces. With the leveling of charges comes the burden of proof. I ask again, for the last time, where is the medical evidence of injury to JFK as a result of a gunman sitting to his immediate left? Blood stains on a shirt doesn't do it unless there's a corresponding bullet hole in the shirt. The only bullet hole in the shirt is in the back on the right side, not the left. Let's stick to the facts. We can't be led astray if we do so.

AntiPharisee

#14
"The autopsy report is worthless.
The news reports reassured us that the final, detailed autopsy gives the true cause of
John F. Kennedy's death. However, you probably already know that our crime labs, police departments, FBI, school teachers, and lots of other people that we trust, have lied to us so often about the world wars and every other Jewish crime, that we would be FOOLS to trust an autopsy report about John F. Kennedy when there is evidence that Jews were involved with his death.
The Jews can easily produce an autopsy report without analyzing John F. Kennedy's body.
All they have to do is have a meeting, agree on the cause of death, and send the "autopsy results" to their criminal friends in the police department and media."

AntiPharisee

PROPAGANDA:
The only bullet hole in the shirt is in the back on the right side, not the left. Let's stick to the facts. We can't be led astray if we do so.


TRUTH:
The so-called bullet hole is no such thing; it seems to have been hastily made by snipping along three sides with scissors and then tearing the resulting flap of material off. Photo here:
http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm

CrackSmokeRepublican

Tomas,

I agree with AntiPharisee here,

the problem is that there was a coverup after the killing. The "truth" of how exactly it was carried out may never be fully known.
However, there are a lot of people killed in the aftermath by JEWS.  That is a fact.

A lot of criminal Jews surrounded JFK's Killing with far more evidence than could be pinned on a beguiled patsie.
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

scorpio

The kennedy assassination was a big step forward for the zio-agenda.
All the details will probably never be known for sure.

The end result speaks for itself.

AntiPharisee

Look at the time we've wasted already on "the wife did it."

I would instead write:
Look at all the time wasted already on "others than the wife did it."
and:
Look at all the future time saved by PROVING "the wife did it."

www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm

/tab

.
Tom Wilson: From the Ground up

From the Ground up

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bXkRO-zypo

Was There a Shot from the Drains ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wVpRSrRjSo

but of course here they say  . . .

QuoteUnfortunately for Wilson, Kennedy's jacket is in the National Archives in College Park, Maryland. It has no bullet hole in the front.

http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:8Np ... en&ct=clnk


greetings

/tab
.
.

AntiPharisee


/tab

.
Quote from: "AntiPharisee"Neville Jones: From the Rear Left Seat up

From the Rear-Left-Seat up

http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm
QuoteAdditional Information
The bulk of this analysis went live on the Internet on 2nd September 2008, but I have since been stimulated into further research on this topic by some of the possibilities discussed on a David Icke forum :shock:  that was started on 26th July 2009.

but hey, Michael Collins Piper wrote those books:
 
FINAL JUDGMENT
The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy
This work documents the strong likelihood that Israel used bullets to steal from the American people their right to have their own leader. JFK fought a bitter behind-the-scenes battle to thwart joint Israeli-Red Chinese nuclear bomb development. Only Zionists have held the power necessary to sustain a cover-up in America's corrupt government and controlled national media. Please link to "Look Inside" pages for the ebook edition.



The GOLEM: Israel's Nuclear Hell Bomb and the Road to Global Armageddon.



http://mikepiperreport.com/

By the way me personally don't like MCP talking warm & fuzzy about George Lincoln Rockwell . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Lincoln_Rockwell

QuoteHis father, George Lovejoy "Doc" Rockwell, was born in Providence, Rhode Island of English and Scottish descent. His mother, Claire Schade Rockwell, was the daughter of Augustus Schade, a German immigrant, and Corrine Boudreau, who was of Acadian French ancestry. Both parents were vaudeville comedians and actors. Some of his father's acquaintances included Fred Allen, Benny Goodman, Walter Winchell, Jack Benny, and Groucho Marx.



. . . but they killed Rockwell at last so it is more to the history than what the eye can see.
.
.

AntiPharisee

"Additional Information
The bulk of this analysis went live on the Internet on 2nd September 2008, but I have since been stimulated into further research on this topic by some of the possibilities discussed on a David Icke forum  that was started on 26th July 2009."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, he's referring to this David Icke forum started
by.........drum roll.........wait for it...............ME!!!

averaging 500 views per day, 13,500 so far.

The disinformation moles at US Army Information Systems Command,
Headquarters, Churchville, Maryland
had their ( black ) hearts drop to their stomach when they saw those numbers.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=74729
----------------------------------------------------------------
antipharisee
Member

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 56   JFK MURDER SOLVED - watch killer in action

The smoke has been caused by some explosive reaction, such as the detonation of a firearm cartridge. Such smoke remains where the gun is; it does not travel with the bullet. The fact that this smoke appears in the sequence at the same time as the fatal injury, and that it emanates from the left-hand-side of JFK's head, where Jackie Kennedy has positioned herself, means that President Kennedy was killed by his wife.
more:
http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm

Anonymous

He Was Killed Because Of Israels nuke program. That's Point One. Two The Whole Shot Him Debate Seems Like Mental Masterbation.  We Have Far More Important Things To Push In to The Mainstream.  Just one Mans View!

AntiPharisee

He Was Killed Because Of Israels nuke program. That's Point One. Two The Whole Shot Him Debate Seems Like Mental Masterbation. We Have Far More Important Things To Push In to The Mainstream. Just one Mans View!

I would instead write:
He was killed by his wife Jackie because of many issues including Israel's
nuke program. That's point one. Point two: The whole shot him debate seems like
mental masturbation and pointless because it's not a debate anymore,
the case has been solved here:
www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm
We have very few more important things to push into the mainstream.
Just one man, Dr. Neville T. Jones, has convinced all the millions
of the most intelligent men and women to share his view.

AntiPharisee

People like the one who said,

"Show me the head x-ray with a bullet wound to the left side of the head. I've never seen one. Have you?,"

do not really understand what we are dealing with. Only if the FBI, for instance, were to come out and say, "Jacqueline did it and here is all the evidence," would we see such a piece of evidence that this character thinks would otherwise be available. Their stance is absurd, which means that they either have no power of reasoning, or that they are a disinformation mole, there to muddy the waters for those that are trying to discover the truth.