Travelling to Europe? Think Twice if you Question Hollowcost

[brandon dean]

Travelling to Europe? Think Twice if you Question the Hollowcost...
14 Countries on this Earth are to be avoided if you do not wish to risk your freedom

Brandon Dean
WizardofOswald.com
April 25th, 2009

Have you ever asked yourself why a country–any country–would feel the need to enact legislation which punishes even the public questioning of an historical event? Did you even know laws exist in 14 countries which make thinking for yourself illegal? This article is geared toward those who are serious about investigating history, even to the extent that it might alienate them from their family, friends and society. I have more respect for these individuals than any others on the face of the planet. The truth is more important than anything else–even life– and we must never forget that.

Here in the U.S. and in most of the large western countries, the suffering of the Jewish people during World War II has been front page news for over sixty years. Any time a new holocaust museum springs up, it's front page news. Every time a huge Hollywood director comes out with a new film or TV special about World War II or the holocaust, it's everywhere-on every billboard and commercial they can expose you to. These same promote the hopeless and false story of gas chambers which killed six million, four million, one and a half million, or many other random numbers of Jews during this supposed holocaust. The numbers of dead have changed more times than a craps game in the boys' bathroom at junior high school...

So those who wish to perpetuate this myth, which has sucked the souls of the German people dry, have lobbied for and enacted laws in fourteen different countries (all European besides Israel) which make it ILLEGAL to even question the holocaust of the Jews during World War II! it is actually illegal to question an historical event!

There are people in jail RIGHT NOW for questioning the holocaust, including but not limited to Ernst Zundl and Dr. Fredrick Toben. Just yesterday, David Duke, a white separatist and American citizen, was arrested in the Czech Republic while on his way to a seminar, for questioning the holocaust of the Jews during World War II. He was released today and told to get out of the country by midnight. How dare he question history!!

The purpose of this article is not to convince you one way or the other about the holocaust itself (which most certainly did not happen the way we've been taught), but to illustrate exactly how absurd "holocaust denial" laws are, and to help truth-lovers avoid being arrested while vacationing in foreign lands.

These are the countries truth-loving people should avoid until their idiotic laws are repealed, included with the title of the legislation which made thinking for yourself illegal:

Austria: National Socialism Prohibition Law (1947, amendments of 1992)Austria

Belgium: Negationism Law (1995, amendments of 1999)

Czech Republic: Law Against Support and Dissemination of Movements Oppressing Human Rights and Freedoms (2001)

France: LAW No 90-615 to repress acts of racism, anti-semitism and xenophobia (1990)

Germany: Criminal Code: § 130 Public Incitement (1985, amendments of 1992, 2002 and 2005)

Israel: Prohibition of Holocaust Denial Law (1986) (note that Israel does not try to couch its tyranny in flowery legal language)

Leichtenstein: § 283 (5) (2000)

Lithuania: Resolution on the Crimes of Totalitarian Regimes

Luxembourg: Article 457 (3)

Poland: Act of 18 December 1998 on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation

Portugal: Racial Discrimination Law

Romania: Emergency Ordinance no.31 (2002, ratified May 2005)

Spain: Anti-Genocide Law (1971, amendments of 1995)

Switzerland: 261bis Rassendiskriminierung / Discrimination Raciale (1995)

And that's that my friends... Don't question their fantasy if you wish to travel to any the above countries. I guess we're still safe in countries like Italy, Sweden, Denmark, Ireland, Scotland, England, Norway, Finland, and Greece.

If you believe the hollowcost happened exactly as you were told, no matter how many different versions of the "truth" they've fed you, then feel free to go buck wild and travel wherever you want...

© Brandon Dean 2009

[§N9sh2bj]

Europe is nice. Been there many times. And -yes- there may be public restrictions on declaring the Holocaust (TM) as it's represented in the mainstream to be a fraud. This restriction does not stop private discussion of the same topic. That is an important distinction this author seems to miss in his condemnation of the various codes of the corporations de facto of Europe (TM), soon to be the EU (TM). Only ego-centric people who are limited to operating with others in the public sphere (think of those who wear too much make-up or dress like prostitutes), whose private lives are shambles, cannot bear to talk about such things, as they live with frauds as their friends, their psychology is unstable, they don't know who they are, and live as fictions. Even when you say 'I tell you these things privately', they cannot separate. People with such an affliction, not much can be done about.

And what about CANADA? Someone recently, in the last several years, wrote a book which was publicly published (ISBN number). He claimed to be a Subject of the corporation CANADA (look in the SEC.gov filings). He claimed to be a Defendant, sub-corporation and-so-on, and by getting a lawyer, incompetent. An a-turn-on-me. This one of the overlooked first events which happens when retaining a lawyer for 'defense', is the man becomes unable to speak for himself in the foreign jurisdiction of the corporate Court, declared incompetent. It's like being accused of wrong-doing at MCDONALDS as a customer, then getting a MCDONALDS employee to represent you at the MCDONALDS tribunal.

The author, brandon, misses mention of CANADA, or USA. The man exported from CANADA, was a legal resident/subject/citizen/debtor of the USA. By claiming to be a U.S. Citizen or other such legal fiction, the man detained declared himself to have no rights.

In short, it does not matter what private legal code these corporations publish. If by contract the traveler claims to be subject to them, then he is subject to them, by his admission, acquiescence, and refusal to rebut the presumption. Brandon's article, by omission, seems like more fear-mongering boogy-man tactics.

[hurensohn]

I woulden't do it in the Nordic countries neither. They have laws against free speech there too. A "holocaust denier" have been sent to the slammer for one month in Sweden.

[brandon dean]

Europe is nice. Been there many times. And -yes- there may be public restrictions on declaring the Holocaust (TM) as it's represented in the mainstream to be a fraud. This restriction does not stop private discussion of the same topic. That is an important distinction this author seems to miss in his condemnation of the various codes of the corporations de facto of Europe (TM), soon to be the EU (TM). Only ego-centric people who are limited to operating with others in the public sphere (think of those who wear too much make-up or dress like prostitutes), whose private lives are shambles, cannot bear to talk about such things, as they live with frauds as their friends, their psychology is unstable, they don't know who they are, and live as fictions. Even when you say 'I tell you these things privately', they cannot separate. People with such an affliction, not much can be done about.

And what about CANADA? Someone recently, in the last several years, wrote a book which was publicly published (ISBN number). He claimed to be a Subject of the corporation CANADA (look in the SEC.gov filings). He claimed to be a Defendant, sub-corporation and-so-on, and by getting a lawyer, incompetent. An a-turn-on-me. This one of the overlooked first events which happens when retaining a lawyer for 'defense', is the man becomes unable to speak for himself in the foreign jurisdiction of the corporate Court, declared incompetent. It's like being accused of wrong-doing at MCDONALDS as a customer, then getting a MCDONALDS employee to represent you at the MCDONALDS tribunal.
F
The author, brandon, misses mention of CANADA, or USA. The man exported from CANADA, was a legal resident/subject/citizen/debtor of the USA. By claiming to be a U.S. Citizen or other such legal fiction, the man detained declared himself to have no rights.

In short, it does not matter what private legal code these corporations publish. If by contract the traveler claims to be subject to them, then he is subject to them, by his admission, acquiescence, and refusal to rebut the presumption. Brandon's article, by omission, seems like more fear-mongering boogy-man tactics.

wow, way to make a simple issue complicated... I didn't point out that you can PRIVATELY question the hollowcost because IT'S NOT ILLEGAL.

I understand you are on a government/corporation kick, and you're not teaching me anything, but in order to communicate with every day people, who don't automatically understand the contractual agreements involved, it's necessary to just use simple english.  apparently not everyone has it "figured out" like you.

and if you can show me the LAW IN CANADA WHICH MAKES QUESTIONING THE HOLOCAUST ILLEGAL, then I will include canada and the US, and australia for that matter, where toben is in prison--FOR DISOBEYING A COURT ORDER, NOT FOR QUESTIONING THE HOLOCAUST.

In short, it does not matter what private legal code these corporations publish. If by contract the traveler claims to be subject to them, then he is subject to them, by his admission, acquiescence, and refusal to rebut the presumption. Brandon's article, by omission, seems like more fear-mongering boogy-man tactics.

are you joking?  it doesn't matter whether someone agrees with bullshit laws or not, they are subject to them.  you really think duke had a CHOICE about his incarceration in the czech republic?  do you think he had any choice about leaving the country before midnight?  it has NOTHING to do with whether one RECOGNIZES the law or not, if they're sitting in jail.  get it?

and my article is fear-mongering by omitting what?  THE ENTIRE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE WAS TO LIST THE LEGISLATION WHICH MAKES IT ILLEGAL TO QUESTION THE HOLLOWCOST, NOT POINT OUT THE COUNTRIES UNDER ZIONIST INFLUENCE.

fear-mongering?  hahaha

[kolnidre]

Brandon:

In Canada I believe "Holocaust Denial" falls under the Canadian Human Rights Act, which throws the accused under the bus of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, a Jewish-Controlled kangaroo court.

[brandon dean]

Brandon:

In Canada I believe "Holocaust Denial" falls under the Canadian Human Rights Act, which throws the accused under the bus of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, a Jewish-Controlled kangaroo court.

thanks kolnidre... I've heard of canada's hate legislation, but I was under the impression (not 100% on this) it did not specifically cover the holocaust.  do you know of any canadians who are or have been in jail in canada specifically for denying the holocaust?  that I would like to know...

[kolnidre]

thanks kolnidre... I've heard of canada's hate legislation, but I was under the impression (not 100% on this) it did not specifically cover the holocaust.  do you know of any canadians who are or have been in jail in canada specifically for denying the holocaust?  that I would like to know...

I read somewhere about someone being jailed for a month recently, but don't recall the details. Of course, they convicted Ernst Zundel multiple times for "hate crimes" before finally sending him to Zio-occupied Germany for that sham of a trial.