The Khazar Empire, the origins of the big lie....

[twiceborn]

Digesting this would be easier if it was read by Linsey Dawn McKenzie in fishnets, but unfortunately history is seldom fun. I've never been one to mince words, so I'd like to get right into it.

I believe that the term "Khazar" is not accurate to describe the lineage of these people. In fact, I believe we are all being duped by a carefully hidden piece of historical propaganda. This is not some half-baked Jordan Maxwell speculation shit, but a real inconsitency I found during my research. This is also not an attack on anyone, just something I wanted to bring up and share.

Everyone who does decent research eventually comes to the term "Khazar", and their "jewish conversion". What we are told is that this group was a powerful ancient kingdom, who, out of the blue decided to mass convert to Judaism. This group eventually diffused all over Europe and became the "Jews" we know and love today.

In this respect, the information is absolutely correct, but this is not the whole story.

All of the information regarding the "Khazars" can be traced back to so-called "official" historical sources. My question is, why does everyone doing this type of research BELIEVE that this historical information regarding the Khazars is correct?

You can look up "Khazar" online and find thousands of hits. However, every one of these hits is taken verbatim from historically accepted mainstream archaeology and history. The study of this group is of relatively minor archaeological and historical importance to any "professional", and none of these sources has ever been questioned for accuracy. Frankly, all of the research is rather nebulous, it points to a group of people who history has basically forgotten. No real usable information can be gathered from this material other than "thats where they come from".

If we are to believe that the "Jews rewrite history to suit their needs" what makes ANY of you believe that it just began realtively recently? So-called "Jews" have been writing the history since the beginning. In fact, well funded Jews, with an agenda, have made up the majority of "official historians" since the beginning of the field.

It is my contention that ancient "Khazaria" existed. It is mentioned in a handful of old texts and was very important historically. However, I believe that the historians re-discovering this lineage PURPOSEFULLLY skewed the history of this empire. I believe they mistranslated accounts, left out vital facts and changed others to lead future researchers on a wild goose chase to the steppes of southern Russia.

Arthur Koestler, I believe, was a willing accomplice in this. I find it hard to believe that this man, who was a Zionist, Communist, and a propaganda expert, would write "The Thirteenth Tribe" for any honest reason. I think the book is a FALSE DECLARATION OF THE KHAZAR HISTORY to diffuse any real research into the subject which would arise.

Here are some facts about Khazaria that are not mentioned in the history books.

The historical Khazaria was NOT a reference to southern Russia.The peoples of Southern Russia was said to be in a strategic alliance with them, but that idea of Khazars = Russians is a recent idea.

Historical Khazaria was interchangable with the Byzantine empire (Eastern Roman Empire) in antique accounts. The term "Byzantine" itself was created in the 1700's to hide the fact that there was a Roman Empire which had nothing to do with Rome in Italy. The word "byzantine" comes from the Greek meaning "Empire of the Romans".  This empire was in Turkey, and had its capital as modern Istanbul.

The term "Rome" means "Nurturing Breast" and is NOT the proper name of a city or empire. It is akin to calling your country your "homeland". The Eastern Empire in Turkey was also referred to as "Rome" even though it was a seperate empire from that headquartered in Italy.

No one ever found a "Khazar empire" until the they were acutally tasked with going out and finding one. They were told to look in southern Russia, because this was where they THOUGHT it was, despite having no tangible proof. This is BIASED archaeology. Anything you find will be attributed to the group you are looking for, regardless of origin.

No one knows where the Khazar capital city is or was. Everyone spouts the same story, that it was "on the river Volga" but NO REMAINS HAVE EVER BEEN FOUND THERE. Also, sites of major Khazar military campaigns have been excavated and no proof of battles have ever been found there. This still puzzles Russian archaeology to this day. In fact, the total amount of remains found for ANY Khazar empire are a few random belt buckles, arrowheads, and other things which have been attributed (not proven) to come from their empire. These items look exactly the same as other items from the region which are not attributed to the Khazars.

Basically, the only place "Khazaria" exists is in old texts.

The Eastern Roman Empire's rulers were called "Caesars". This is phonetically the same word as "KHAZAR". One of the rulers was known as "Leo the Khazar" or Leo the CAESAR. His real family name was Constantine, "Leo" and "Khazar" were descriptives. The word "Khazar" does NOT derive from the "Turkic  word meaning wandering". Khazar is a Slavic word and means "lion" (ie: LEO) or "predatory animal".

The term Khazaria or Khazar appears often in descriptives of the ruling family of the Eastern Empire in this era. We are told that the Byzantine rulers took Khazar wives. The only proof of this is that the wives were called Khazars. Perhaps these terms are descriptives for the Byzantine rulers, and NOT a foreign empire.

Would people a thousand years from now undrstand that when we call a person a "motherfucker" we dont mean that they come from the "Kingdom of Motherfucker"? I often wonder how many fake histories exist to explain away words which the historians don't understand.

The term Khazaria itself only appears a handful of times in any other historical sources. These sources mainly come from Slavic and Arabic, and the references refer to a foreign empire. Slavic and arabic were both spoken in medieval southern Russia. Why would medieval Russian write accounts of a FOREIGN empire called Khazaria when it was in their own back yard?

And here's the kicker. The Khazar empire was said to be the homeland of the Jews, correct? Well answer me this. Why is the city of "Constantinople" (Constantine's city) called "JERUSALEM" in some medieval texts?

Why is the Eastern Roman Empire called "ISRAEL" in others?

Also, why was the word "Jew"  synonymous with "tax collector, money lender, lawyer, doctor, or governor" in the Eastern Empire?

It has been a supressed historical theory for FIVE HUNDRED years that the Jewish Patriarchs are none other than the EASTERN ROMAN CAESARS, written in Hebrew and given a fake chronology. But no one ever told you that such a viewpoint existed, now did they?

Were the ancient writers idiots? Doesnt it make sense that someone writing "back then" would know the real history which has been muddied ever since. The farther something gets from us the more distorted it appears, it is not the other way around.

Ancient writers believed that Khazaria = Eastern Roman Empire = Israel.

We are told to believe the Ancient Jewish accounts like some gospel, but I believe they are a lie. An example of this was the land of "Mizraim", which we ate told means "Egypt". In Hebrew it means "the two straits", as in ocean straits. THERE ARE NO STRAITS IN EGYPT. However, the only two straits in the western Mediterranean are the Bosphorous and Dardanelles.... in Turkey, the Eastern Roman Empire.

I think somewhere some rabbis are snorting too much of the shit they sell...

I believe the peoples of Southern russia were in a strategic military alliance with the empire. I believe the empire fell at the hands of the people from the north (Russians, Armenians) and East (Palestinians). I believe the Khazar Jews held a grudge. I believe this explains why the first thing the Bolshevik's did was kill off millions of southern Russians. The first thing the Jewish Turk leadership did was kill off the Armenians. The Israeilis killing of the Palestinians...   see a trend?  Vengeance is a bitch.

No, Koestler was wrong, Khazaria was not North of the Black Sea, it was SOUTH of it.

I think the "Jewish People" are NOT ANCIENT. They dont stretch back thousands of years. Their history is that of the first and second "Roman" Empires in Egypt and Turkey, rewritten for a Hebrew ear. They rewrote their OWN history to lend credibility to their civilization, and even their own people dont know any better.
 
Wouldn't it make sense that the rulers and upper class of this empire, after it fell, would scatter to Europe to begin again? They would being their knowhow and capital with them. No one has ever explained to me how "poor persecuted Jews" could leave one country and end up in another, with ENOUGH GOLD TO BEGIN BANKS some of which lent to KINGS (Rothchilds/Bayers).  Arent poor persecuted people usually, well, poor? Where did the capital come from?

I dont believe their lies anymore, no matter how old and "accepted" they are.

Unfortunately, so much of history has been burned, hidden, or rewritten that its impossible to put together a completely coherent view. I understand that, and accept that there are a lot of holes here which need filling. It took billions of people thousands of years to make history, and i'm just one guy, i'm giving it my best.

So those are my thoughts  on the Khazars. Let the games begin.

(p.s. -  If you dont like what i'm saying I know you will be able to find "historical research by highly regarded authors" to disprove it. Don't cut and paste Wikipedia. I dont care about a debate. I am trying to THINK FOR MYSELF and draw my own conclusions, and if you have something to share I would like to hear it.  I also have access to research which you will never find in the mainstream or the VERY controlled "underground".  If you are nice I may even share it with you, just ask and i'll do my best.)

[twiceborn]

I just wanted to add that I do have the references for all of this if needed. Just let me know.

The main volumes used are Fomenko's "History: Fiction of Science" volumes 1-4 and
Melamed and Grishin's "Medieval empire of the Israelites".

I don't agree with all of the information in those books, but they give many useful facts and give a good picture of just how unreliable  mainstream history and chronology can be.

Thanks.

[Anonymous]

I just want to say thank you for providing the perspective you have.  I, for one, will be looking more into it.  Keep it up!

Peace.

[twiceborn]

I just came across this fact on another post and wanted to add it here:

"Mithraism IS Zionism"

...Mithraism was the main religion for the rulers in the Eastern Empire before they developed the Catholic Church. Emperor Constantine (of Constantinople) was a Mithraic until his deathbed, when he switched to his new Christian Religion. If Mithraism and Zionism are the same thing with the name switched, it adds up pretty nicely...