Dump Israel, Dump the U.S., Dump the Jews

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

@ Negentropic
I assume you think whatever Eustace Mullins writes is the word of God huh? There are numerous holes in that narrative. If Khomeini and now Khamenei are CIA puppets just as the Shah was, then why are they trying to overthrow the current Iranian regime? There is a massive U.S. psychological and propaganda warfare campaign being launched against Iran at this moment in time. The U.S. government signed off on Iran regime change a few years ago under Bush Jr. They have been unsuccessful in all of their attempts to topple Ahmadinejad and Khamenei. If Iran is controlled opposition like you say then why are the CIA and Zionist Jews trying to undermine their own assets with coup attempts?

If the Iranian regime are just puppets then why does Iran sponsor and support the enemies of Israel (Hezbollah/Hamas)?

[Negentropic]

@ Negentropic
I assume you think whatever Eustace Mullins writes is the word of God huh? There are numerous holes in that narrative. If Khomeini and now Khamenei are CIA puppets just as the Shah was, then why are they trying to overthrow the current Iranian regime? There is a massive U.S. psychological and propaganda warfare campaign being launched against Iran at this moment in time. The U.S. government signed off on Iran regime change a few years ago under Bush Jr. They have been unsuccessful in all of their attempts to topple Ahmadinejad and Khamenei. If Iran is controlled opposition like you say then why are the CIA and Zionist Jews trying to undermine their own assets with coup attempts?

If the Iranian regime are just puppets then why does Iran sponsor and support the enemies of Israel (Hezbollah/Hamas)?

They do undermine their own less important assets and they do this constantly as world events present themselves if it will serve to further their longer term goals. It's the longer term and often more hidden goals that they are always striving for, (mainly overall power).  Go read the Protocols again or some of the writings of Bertrand Russell and H.G. Wells if you want proof that they have been doing this for a long time.    


All controlled oppositions turn authentic to different degrees after a certain amount of time that's why they're called 'CONTROLLED' opposition. This is inevitable. They know that it's impossible to control everything but that they can definitely control what's really important and direct it to serve their interests more or less, give or take certain unforeseen possiblities which they also provide for. It's like a big controlled lab experiment with all the potential troublesome factors checked and accounted for if and when they appear and the potential of solving these troubles also checked and accounted for to different degrees. Then they just let the scenario unfold on the big world stage with lots of little-bitty actors running around acting pathetic within their designated cages and deal with it as they must or as they have already made allowances for ahead of time, sometimes decades ahead of time with careful planning and social engineering. It's not all that complicated really, it just takes lots and lots of money which they don't need taxes for, having already achieved full legal control of banking and finance everywhere .  If you look through recent history this has been the case over and over.  Especially in countries like Iran where people have thousand year histories and lots of pride you would have to be a moron not to factor that in.  They founded whole think-tanks and schools dedicated to studying the Middle East so that then they can hedge their bets better. For example, the Shah of Iran rebelled after a while when he realized that the CIA/Mossad/MI6 and all the Western-alliances were not serious about helping his country and were only industrializing it and militarizing it to continue its dependent position.  So he had to be slapped down hard like Mossadeq before him but since they had all the industrialization they needed they could now play their trump card. Now, if you study the history of the region you'll find that British intelligence from the time of the Muslim Brotherhood and before were also in control of the Mullahs and chieftains who held lots of power with the devoutly Muslim common people. Since the time they  had installed the Shah's father they kept the Mullahs and their backwards ways in their grip and protected them from too much persecution. They knew that as soon as the Shah started mouthing off and getting big-headed they could reverse a great deal of the advances made and through his 'controlled' (not dominated, that would be overplaying your hand, it's like putting it on a leash and controlling its length to your taste)  polar opposite keep the country enslaved and the goys fooled.

Whether Ahmedinejad is doing the same thing as the Shah or Saddam in Iraq and is genuinely interested in helping his people  is hard to tell exactly. He certainly doesn't care about the basic human rights of his people if it clashes with what Allah supposedly handed down to the Ayatollah to give to him. If he is an authentic scumbag then he only cares about the people that obey his human-rights-violating Islamic laws because that is the word of god. He certainly isn't going against the Mullahs and the Islamic theocracy that enforce barbaric laws and a reign of terror in the land, if he did, he would be out on his ass so fast he wouldn't know what hit him. To tell you the truth, if Israel and the Yanks really wanted to get rid of him and Islamic theocracy altogether it wouldn't be all that much tougher than Iraq really, maybe twice as tough but if they use some more nuclear weapons they can cut the job down to about Iraq size.  In fact, they could have easily gone after Iran instead of Iraq and Afghanistan by just declaring in the all their mainstream media 24-7 that Iran was behind the 9-11 attacks or connected to it, some complete bovine excrement, and the dumbed-down Yank-public would have bought it.  I think the problem may have been Saddam possibly deciding to join the Iranians and fight against them whereas they knew the Iranians wouldn't join in defending Saddam, not the least of their reason being  Saddam invaded their country right after the revolution under direct orders from West. They did this to weaken the regime a bit and increase their control not because they had lost control. They saw the Iranians straining at the leash and pulled back using Saddam in the process.  If they had lost control why would they fund both sides as Iran-Contra proved?  You see they want the Iranians to act crazy say crazy things, even physically attack Israel and the West occasionally so that they can broadcast this 24 hours a day or as much as possible into gullible Western minds. This serves to demonize all Muslims and bring about moblize stupid Yank-led attack dogs against it if and when they need it.  The big guys aren't interested in Israel winning. Israel has already won. What the fuck do you call a minimum of 4 billion dollars a year loan guarantees for the past 60 years?  That's not including reparations from the German wage-slaves.  They're interested in overall control and power.  Funding both sides of wars is ancient history for them and they're friggin experts at it.  Think about it, who the fuck would Iran sell its oil to if the entire West plus the China and Russia they control through trade really wanted to blockade and embargo them?  Would China risk all the made-in-China products disappearing from Western store shelves overnight by alienating the Banksters? Of course not, why do you think Rothschild is the only bank allowed to operate in China and Lubavitchers run around at will there. Nope, Mullins was right, they give they give people like the Iranians just enough slack in the leash to become 'threats' and then they have a big laugh and pull on the leash again. Ahmedinejad's moderateness is about as moderate as Khruschev & Lenin vs. Stalin or Castro vs. some more murderous maniac like Che Guevara but that's about as far as the freak show charade goes.




family photo



Moroccan Taxi

[Negentropic]

@ negentropic
funny how you can me a "ranter & raver" in the midst of a lunatic novel-length post. You're the biggest ranter on this site. You can't get your point across in less than 1000 words like a true ranting lunatic. Usually the bottom half of your posts is where you descend into absolute la-la land and post shit that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

 :lol:  That's because you have no imagination. Besides I do it on purpose just to piss you off.  :lol: