Hello from Coffinman

[Coffinman]

Hi guys.
Maybe we can get some discussion going on the core issue affecting the World here, and perhaps learn a few things.
We'll see.
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/site_contents.htm

[Anonymous]

Welcome, Coffinman!

[high_treason]

Welcome Coffinman, interesting site

[sullivan]

Hi ho Coffinman... its off to work we go

[Ognir]

Coffinman was banned by HHQ but I don't have a problem with him

[Anonymous]

I welcomed him in.

Welcome buddy

[Canard]

Hi coffin, welcome, welcome!!!! I  think I heard you do some skype cast shows with Dire Wolf on from the bunker.  Glad to have you aboard.

[joeblow]

Coffinman was banned by HHQ but I don't have a problem with him

Coffinman is a big time NO-PLANER and was a close friend to NICO HAUPT (VIDEO: Provocateur Attacks WeAreCHANGE).

http://coffinmansblog.blogspot.com/2007 ... 0-faq.html

Coffinman's blog

WTC Planehugger Therapy -Top 30 FAQ

T.V. fakery and political analyst and dedicated to getting the truth out

Planehuggers is a recent political  neologism that has been used on the  World Wide Web frequently in  newsgroups  and blogs.The term refers to those people in the  9/11 Truth Movement, also known as truthlings, who believe that real, full size commercial passenger jets or planes were used in the 9/11 event. There have been many serious  researchers questioning the official account of 9/11 in the Truth Movement such as  Morgan Reynolds, who feel they have proven that a real, commercial jet was not used at the  Pentagon explosions, nor were real passenger jets used at the  Twin Towers of the  World Trade Center.

[Anonymous]

Well, as long as Coffinman does not try to high-jack threads by continually bringing up no-planer ideology, I don't see a problem.  I personally consider the no planes theory a theory, but there is not enough evidence to make it the truth.  The burden of proof lays with them to prove their theory, and as it stands it cannot be proven 100%.  I prefer to focus on the fact that shit happened, that planes were there.  Is it possibly the truth?  Yes.  But why waste time trying to convince everyone that it is absolutely the truth 100% and everyone else is wrong wh ent here isn't even enough evidence to conclude it as such.  It just creates problems.

When these guys have a 100% concrete proof, let's say they have evidence of original footage where there wasn't planes hitting the towers vs edited footage, etc, well I will ignore there stance that it is 100% true there were no-planes.  I watched 911 Octopus, and it made some interesting claims with some weak evidence, but it's far from a conclusive theory.  I see it as being quite weak, but I have not spent much time looking at it apart from that docu.

I have an open mind that anything is possible, but I NEED PROOF to accept it.  Real proof.

So Coffinman, don't bring the no-plane stuff here.  That's my only request.  Keep it on your blog and elsewhere.  If people are interested in it they can PM you or go to the killtown or your blog to look into the evidence collected.  But do not start posting stuff about no-planes here.  That is the only censoring I will accept, because I frankly don't see it lending any credibility when it is only a theory that turns people away.

Peace.

[joeblow]

That is the only censoring I will accept, because I frankly don't see it lending any credibility when it is only a theory that turns people away.

Please, please, please, I'm on my knees begging TiU to keep this forum No-Planer/Black Pope/Spirituality/UFO/Reptiloid bullshit free!!! I literally have no where else to go, everywhere else is contaminated, this is the one and only decent conspiracy website in existence.

[sullivan]

So Coffinman, don't bring the no-plane stuff here.  That's my only request.  Keep it on your blog and elsewhere.  If people are interested in it they can PM you or go to the killtown or your blog to look into the evidence collected.  But do not start posting stuff about no-planes here.  That is the only censoring I will accept, because I frankly don't see it lending any credibility when it is only a theory that turns people away.

I agree. I personally couldn't care less whether the planes on 9/11 were real or TV fakery.  All I know is that discussions (or more often, heated disputes) on this subject are inevitably long, drawn-out, pointless and distracting. I would rather keep the focus on the perps rather than endlessly examining the minutiae their M.O.

[Coffinman]

..... and was a close friend to NICO HAUPT

//

Correction:
I was lead to believe that I was a close associate of his.
However, I discovered that Rosalee Grable (Webfairy, Hag etc.) was a deep-planted agent placed to divert any no-planers due to the false credibility she gained from being the "first one", and that "Judy Wood" was fraudulent and avoiding relevant issues. Also Morgan Reynolds is an agent. (I'm not going to explain it all here, it's not the place).
Haupt was revealed as a saboteur, a provocateur, and he has flooded the video sites with porn and filth tagged so that anyone researching "no-plane theory" will be quickly offended and leave the subject alone.
I had the battle of my life with them when first I exposed Wood, and then Grable tried to attack me in Wood's defence, at the pit of vipers called 911researchers. (If I put a link to their front page, we get one back. Here it is: http://www.911researchers.com/).
Here are some choice threads from the debacle:

Will the real Dr Wood please stand up?:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/643

The Webfairy debacle:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/625

Another call for Dr Wood's expertise:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/650

Webfairy, Nico and the smokescreen and smear campaign:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/714

Bodyguarding:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/721

Another passed on crap message from Wood analysed:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/726

Webfairy insidejobbers message analysed:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/727

A present for Morgan Reynolds:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/737

A present for Dr. Wood:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/738

Webfairy's declared outlook on liars:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/753

Webfairy's three rules (Actually the three that Judaism insists on breaking!):
http://www.911researchers.com/node/754

Webfairy fraudulently cites Coffin as a "Champion for Wood's work"!!:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/757

Webfairy, the sexist fruit-looping troll:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/758

NOTHING PERSONAL:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/763

Common ground, AKA THE GREAT COVER-UP:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/871

I think that should clear up the matter of my previous association with those planted prats.

[Coffinman]

I would rather keep the focus on the perps rather than endlessly examining the minutiae their M.O.

I couldn't agree more.
For those who realise the plane thing, it can often be what opens their eyes to everything, but if you are aware of the whole World situation, the details of how the perps work  don't matter too much. The historical trail is far more damning. (Except it was Zionist controlled media outlets that broadcast the fake live video on 911, so it points a BIG finger. See the link on my sig. if you want to read about that).
It's the same with the Holocaust.
If you listen to "The final solution to Adolf Hitler", you will see that the evidence for those events being part of a Zionist plan is immense, and the issue of the Gas chambers is really not that important.

However......
If you could put proof of these "not so important issues" into the mainstream awareness, then you might find that they would have enormous impact.
Most people believe what the "official" TV tells them.
It is the "not so important issues" (are they basic or major?) that burst the bubble for those who have not woken up yet.
But they won't let you do that.

[Coffinman]

The burden of proof lays with them to prove their theory

I won't discuss the issue here, but I have to disagree with you.
In a court of law (or science) the burden is to prove that something DID happen, not that it didn't. We have no proof of planes. Like I said, I will not discuss the matter here.

And yes, it turns people away, since Haupt has done such a good job of associating the issue with porn and filth.
You can compare it very strongly with the "holocaust".

911Octopus:
Did you see at the beginning it says "once the Octopus has control it will completely destroy ISRAEL"?!!!!!!
"BSreg" is as dirty as they come. He has some proper crap hidden in those clips, but it is hidden well.
He reduces 911 to an attack on "Israel"!

"The Octopus" was a term used by Elizabeth Dilling, and the title of her book (I haven't got or read it) that describes the Talmudic infiltration of World politics.

[Anonymous]

Just an FYI: Coffinman won't be posting anymore due to my sending him a warning about posting no-plane stuff.  So that's that, his choice to leave...