Archeological Finds Disprove Darwinism

[Shiksa Rage]

Archeological Finds Disprove Darwinism

Masons Try to Suppress Evidence

"Anatomically modern humans have been present on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version), but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design have been in use at equally early periods."


by Cornelius B
(for henrymakow.com)


The model of human prehistory built-up by scholars over the past two centuries is sadly and completely wrong, and a deliberate tool of disinformation and mind control.

This is the thesis of the essay, "Forbidden Archaeology" by Michael Cremo and Richard L. Thompson (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienc ... eology.htm)


The authors begin with the assumption that archeologists are fundamentally of good faith. Nevertheless, little by little, they demonstrate a systematic destruction of proofs that show another reality than that the official story. Falsifications and even destruction of such proofs has been common for more than two hundred years.

In their first essay "The Hidden History of the Human Race", Cremo and Thompson push back our horizons not just thousand years, but millions of years into the past, and show that almost everything we have been taught to believe about the origins and evolution of our species rests on a highly selective sampling of research.


The two authors then set the record straight by showing all the other research results that have been edited out, not because there was anything wrong about them, but simply because "they did not fit with prevailing academic opinion."

Anomalous and out-of-place discoveries reported by Cremo and Thompson in "The Hidden History of the Human Race" include convincing evidence that anatomically modern humans have been present on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version), but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design have been in use at equally early periods.





SCIENTIFIC CENSORSHIP





The authors describe an ongoing social process of knowledge filtration that at first sight appears quite innocuous, but has a substantial cumulative effect. Certain categories of evidence simply disappear from view.

This pattern of data suppression has been going on for a long time. For instance, in 1880, J. D. Whitney, the state geologist of California, published a lengthy review of advanced stone tools found in California gold mines. The implements, including spear points and stone mortars and pestles, were found deep in mine shafts, underneath thick, undisturbed layers of lava, in formations ranging from 9 million to over 55 million years old.

W. H. Holmes of the Smithsonian Institution, one of the most vocal critics of these California finds, wrote:

"Perhaps if Professor Whitney had fully appreciated the story of human evolution as it is understood today, he would have hesitated to announce the conclusions formulated (that humans existed in very ancient times in North America), notwithstanding the imposing array of testimony with which he was confronted."

In other words, if the facts do not agree with the favored theory, then such facts, even an imposing array of them, must be discarded.

I shall give here some examples of these discarded paleo-archaeological elements:

In a report delivered to the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1881, H. Slopes, F.G.S. (Fellow of the Geological Society), described a shell, the surface of which bore a carving of a crude but unmistakably human face. The carved shell was found in the stratified deposits of the Red Crag, which is between 2.0 and 2.5 million years old.


One should keep in mind that in terms of conventional paleontological opinion, one does not encounter such works of art until the time of fully modern Cro-Magnon man in the Late Pleistocene, about 30,000 years ago.


On August 2, 1890, J. H. Neale signed the following statement about discoveries made by him:

"In 1877 Mr. J. H. Neale was superintendent of the Montezuma Tunnel Company, and ran the Montezuma tunnel into the gravel underlying the lava of Table Mountain, Tuolumne County. . . . At a distance of between 1400 and 1500 feet from the mouth of the tunnel, or of between 200 and 300 feet beyond the edge of the solid lava, Mr. Neale saw several spear-heads, of some dark rock and nearly one foot in length.


On exploring further, he himself found a small mortar three or four inches in diameter and of irregular shape. This was discovered within a foot or two of the spear-heads. He then found a large well formed pestle, now the property of Dr. R. I. Bromley, and near by a large and very regular mortar, also at present the property of Dr. Bromley."

Neale's affidavit continued:

"All of these relics were found. . . . close to the bed-rock, perhaps within a foot of it. Mr. Neale declares that it is utterly impossible that these relics can have reached the position in which they were found excepting at the time the gravel was deposited, and before the lava cap formed. There was not the slightest trace of any disturbance of the mass or of any natural fissure into it by which access could have been obtained either there or in the neighborhood."

The position of the artifacts in gravel close to the bedrock at Tuolumne Table Mountain indicates they were 33-55 million years old.


In 1844, Sir David Brewster reported that a nail had been discovered firmly embedded in a block of sandstone from the Kingoodie (Mylnfield) Quarry in Scotland. Dr. A. W. Medd of the British Geological Survey wrote to the authors in 1985 that this sandstone is of "Lower Old Red Sandstone age" (Devonian, between 360 and 408 million years old). Brewster was a famous Scottish physicist. He was a founder of the British Association for the Advancement of Science and made important discoveries in the field of optics.

In his report to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Brewster stated:

"The stone in Kingoodie quarry consists of alternate layers of hard stone and a soft clayey substance called 'till'; the courses of stone vary from six inches to upwards of six feet in thickness. The particular block in which the nail was found, was nine inches thick, and in proceeding to clear the rough block for dressing, the point of the nail was found projecting about half an inch (quite eaten with rust) into the 'till,' the rest of the nail lying along the surface of the stone to within an inch of the head, which went right down into the body of the stone."

The fact that the head of the nail was buried in the sandstone block would seem to rule out the possibility the nail had been pounded into the block after it was quarried.


On June 22, 1844, this curious report appeared in the London Times:

"A few days ago, as some workmen were employed in quarrying a rock close to the Tweed about a quarter of a mile below Rutherford-mill, a gold thread was discovered embedded in the stone at a depth of eight feet."

Dr. A. W. Medd of the British Geological Survey wrote to the authors in 1985 that this stone is of Early Carboniferous age (between 320 and 360 million years old).


(Ed. Note: Cornelius B cites many more examples which I excised in the interest of brevity.)



DISINFORMATION AND MIND CONTROL





"Forbidden Archeology" was first released in 1993 and quickly became an underground classic. Today it is a bestseller, with foreign editions in over a dozen languages, presenting both accepted and anomalous scientific evidence defying the traditional view of human evolution. This is a fascinating intellectual excavation of a vast store of hidden knowledge.

I'll let you judge their proofs sustaining the human evolution. What is the purpose behind this disinformation if not mind control, and therefore social engineering?

Science is a method that anyone can learn and apply. In a free and open society, science has to be a democratic process. Instead, we observe a behavior similar to the totalitarian attitude of the ancient priesthood clique in Egypt. To better illustrate this affirmation, I present the case of a science journalist, Richard Milton, initially an ardent believer in Darwinian doctrine until his investigative instincts kicked in one day.

After 20 years of studying and writing about evolution, he suddenly realized that there were many disconcerting elements in the theory. He decided to put every main classic proof of Darwinism to the test. The results were hard to believe -- he found that the theory could not even stand up to the rigors of routine investigative journalism. Next, he published a book titled "The Facts of Life: Shattering the Myths of Darwinism".


Milton says:

"I experienced the witch-hunting activity of the Darwinist police at first hand - it was deeply disappointing to find myself being described by a prominent Oxford zoologist, Richard Dawkins, as "loony", "stupid" and "in need of psychiatric help" in response to purely scientific reporting."

Does this sound like stories that came out of the Soviet Union 25 years ago when dissident scientists there started speaking out?


Without a doubt Dawkins is part of the "secret societies brotherhood" invested with high power. Richard Dawkins has been appointed to the position of Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. This advocate of aetheism is a classic "Brain Police" storm-trooper, patrolling the neurological front lines.  


According to Milton, the process came to a head when the London Times Higher Education Supplement commissioned him to write a critique of Darwinism. The publication foreshadowed his coming piece: "Next Week: Darwinism - Richard Milton goes on the attack". Dawkins caught wind of this and wasted no time in nipping this heresy in the bud. He contacted the editor, Auriol Stevens, and accused Milton of being a "creationist", and prevailed upon Stevens to pull the plug on the article. Milton learned of this behind-the-scenes backstabbing and wrote a letter of appeal to Stevens. In the end, she caved in to Dawkins and scratched the piece.
 


DARWINISM AS MIND CONTROL


The Western scientific establishment and mass media pride themselves on being open public forums devoid of prejudice or censorship. However, no television program examining the flaws and weaknesses of Darwinism has ever been aired in Darwin's home country or in America. A scientist who opposes the theory cannot get a paper published.


Darwin's theory of evolution is the only theory routinely taught in our public school system that has never been subjected to rigorous scrutiny; nor have any of the criticisms been allowed into the curriculum. This is an interesting fact, because a recent poll showed that "71% of the American public say biology teachers should teach both Darwinism and scientific evidence against Darwinian theory." Nevertheless, there are no plans to implement this balanced approach.
 
Then there is the high-profile case of Dr Virginia Steen-McIntyre, a geologist working for the US Geological Survey (USGS), who was dispatched to an archaeological site in Mexico to date a group of artifacts in the 1970s. This travesty also illustrates how far the « brothers scientists" will go to guard orthodox tenets.
 
McIntyre used state-of-the-art equipment and backed up her results by using four different methods, but her results were off the chart. The lead archaeologist expected a date of 25,000 years or less, and the geologist's finding was 250,000 years or more.
 
The figure of 25,000 years or less was critical to the Bering Strait "crossing" theory, and it was the motivation behind the head archaeologist's tossing Steen-McIntyre's results in the circular file and asking for a new series of dating tests. This sort of reaction does not occur when dates match the expected chronological model that supports accepted theories.
 
Steen-McIntyre was given a chance to retract her conclusions, but because this woman was intellectually honest, she refused. She found it hard thereafter to get her papers published and she lost a teaching job at an American university.





CONCLUSION


Thus, as we may conclude from the information provided here, Darwinism, the theory of the survival of the fittest and its twin sister, the theory of human evolution, together with the official version of the Paleontology and Archaeology such as they are practiced, are pseudo-sciences.

In fact, they are tools for mind control of the masses. Their main purpose is to cut off the roots of the true history of humanity, and promote a naturalistic and mechanistic view of life as "survival of the fittest." They promote atheism as a means of destroying Christian civilization.

We find the same hate of God and of Christianity in Marxism and Freudianism.


A very interesting read is the book of Richard Wurmbrand "Marx & Satan" where we discover that Marx was a Satanist priest with a deep hate of God and desire for the ruin and annihilation of the human society. How can we explain this deep hated nourished in the hearts of these men? Was it satanic possession?

I will close with this fact -- at the funerals of Karl Marx, in his speech Frederich Engels compared Marx to Darwin as titans of the human mind, and this suggests the high probability that Darwin was Karl Marx's "Luciferian brother".

[Wimpy]

Shiksa Rage,

One need not propose ideas that go back millions of years to find confrontation from the established archeological academia.  If any evidence is presented that does not conform to accepted Biblical based or Egyptology then man is to be viewed as no more than crude, hunter gatherers.  Wandering stupid nomads barely able to feed themselves.

I've seen the reports of finds suggesting millions of years and I'm quite open minded to the idea should complete data from proven stratified sites is presented to me.  Unfortunately, academia is not 'financed' by unbiased sources and unequivocal proof will not sway them a millimeter.  I have also discovered, from personal experience and the list of 'names' within the Archeological community that it is completely infested and controlled by zionists.

In a somewhat related topic, I have just completed a website which covers a 30 year family project.  We have identified a burial ceremony which covers late Paleo, Archaic and Woodland time periods and it presents itself as a Bird Effigy, made from stone, that is placed at the time of burial.  This discovery is a World Wide phenomena, it is obvious once one 'looks' but has been ignored by Academia because it doesn't fit with their program.  Stupid hunter gatherers could not produce and express ideas.

The website, if you're interested is:  http://www.paleobirdeffigies.com

[Shiksa Rage]

Darwin Was an Instrument of the Illuminati
March 13, 2010

"Think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzsche-ism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim."

(Protocols of the Elders of Zion 2-3. "Us Jews" refers to Cabalist i.e. Illuminati Jews)  

by Cornelius B

for henrymakow.com





Darwinism, the theory of the "natural selection and survival of the fittest", is of major importance to the Illuminati.  We know this because, as Richard Milton explains in his article, "Darwinism - The Forbidden Subject",  public debate of Darwinism is forbidden.


"Most educated, rational people will find it almost impossible to believe that the debate of Darwinism through mainstream news papers and the principal TV channels is forbidden. I still find it hard to believe myself," Milton writes.

While there is no evidence that Darwin was a Mason, the males in his family were Freemasons, and so were his close colleagues and friends.

Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802), physician and biologist, grandfather of Charles, became a Mason in the Lodge of Cannongate Kilwinning, No. 2, of Scotland.

Sir Francis Darwin, (1786-1859), physician and traveler, brother of Charles Darwin's father, became a Mason in Tyrian Lodge, No. 253, at Derby, in 1807. The name of Charles Darwin does not appear on the rolls of the Lodge but it is very possible that he also was a Mason.


Charles Darwin was well into eugenics and bloodline breeding. The Darwins and Wedgwoods intermarried for several generations. That's the top Freemason way (the Rothschilds even married their sisters). Thus, Charles Darwin chose to marry his cousin, Emma Wedgwood.
 


THE NEXT MILLION YEARS


A book, "The Next Million Years" by Darwin's grandson, Charles Galton Darwin (1887-1962) is supposed to be a NWO blueprint. You can download it from scribd (http://www.scribd.com/doc/23619812/The- ... arwin-1953).  


Charles Galton Darwin says that "every civilization has really been a form of slavery for the people."


In his view, this is the "natural order", and of course " the leaders" are trained in the technique of enslaving people since birth.


They're brought up listening to a different version of reality than the rest of the population. They're told that in the realities of life, the predators should be at the top of the "natural order". They're predators, of course, because they're such hypocrites, liars, deceivers, and unscrupulous cheats. As good predators, they can't tell the people how they're really feeding off them, or manipulating them for different ends, "because those with the low IQ's, you know the little people at the bottom of the pile, have to be kept in the dark."  

 
The arms of the Darwin family are very suggestive of their belonging also, just as their motto - "Cave et aude" (Beware and Dare). How about those Satanic red stars, identical to the Soviet symbol?





Because Marx remained a relatively obscure figure in his own lifetime, and his ideology didn't spread, something was necessary to make the masses more receptive... and this something was Darwinism. Darwin's theory eliminated God and presented life as a struggle for survival of the fittest. It was the necessary ingredient for the acceptance of a slave state, and of a cycle of crime, violence, destruction, anarchy, revolutions and wars.




ADAM SMITH


In his essay, "The Structure of Evolutionary Theory" (2004), Stephen Jay Gould finds a strong kinship between Darwin's "natural selection" of "the invisible hand of the market" of Adam Smith in "The Wealth of Nations." (1776) According to Smith, each individual is in constant search to satisfy his own interests, to best employ his capital and to better sell his work.


The establishment of the relationship of "genuine competition" of all private interests in a "free market" would result in "the greatest wealth and happiness for all".


Adam Smiths' economic liberalism, just as Darwin's theory, is pure ideology because at that time, nothing similar existed in the real world. Alas, shortly after this publication, under the effect of particularly ferocious laws and policy promoted by the dominant social classes (enclosure, bloody repression of the Luddites in 1812, abolition of the law of assistance to the poor in 1834, etc.) Smith justified a kind of enslavement.

With his vision of the economy, Smith introduced the destruction of the social bonds - of neighborhood, of trade corporations with their ancient solidarity, of inter-help and reciprocity, and this ideology undermined the traditional mutual help and assistance between the members of a same family. All these relations that enriched the social fabric, and the quality of life, were reduced to the notions of cold personal interest, selfishness and to the quest of money.


The poor literally became slaves, and for the slightest mischief, such as the cut of a tree, or poaching, could send a man to gallows, or be sent to the colonies -- America, and later Australia and New Zealand, South Africa, etc. -- to work as a slave (see "They were White and they were Slaves", by Michael Hoffman II -- http://www.revisionisthistory.org/forgottenslaves.html. You also view an interview of M. Hoffman by Ernst Zundel on the same topic -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ugo1YxZWWJ8).





Smith's free market coompetition corresponds to Darwin's survival of the fittest. The rest of the population becomes disposable, therefore eventually must disappear, or may be disposed of as pleased. This concept opened large the gates to the "demons" of Eugenics, Fascism, Nazism, Communism, Feminism, and lately of Neo-conservatism, all of them of Luciferian or satanic inspiration (see also "Jewish Convert, Rev. Richard Wurmbrand Defined "The Spiritual War"" on http://www.henrymakow.com/_richard_wurm ... e_spi.html) as tools for total control of the human society.


Thus, with the concept of the "survival of the fittest", Darwinism became the central pillar for new theories such as "Marxist-Leninist dialectical materialism" theory which introduces class war; Freud which posits sexuality as the central motivation of the "human machine" and all the perversions this entails; Fascism, Nazism and Zionism as forms of absolute totalitarianism and criminal behavior; Feminism as gender war with destruction of the familial entity, depopulation,  and control over the education of children who are educated by brainwashed individuals under the control of governments, in turn infiltrated and controlled by secret societies.

This is in accordance with the agenda of the Illuminati, who pursue the destruction of Christian civilization and the enslavement of humanity. Thus, Darwinism, the central pillar of the "modern theories" which alters minds, attitudes and actions of the people, is still necessary to these Illuminati predators. This is the only plausible explanation for why the public debate of Darwin's scientific findings  is forbidden.

Was Darwin a front man for the Illuminati agenda? What do you think?

 



 

 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/was_darwin_an ... of_th.html
Articles >>