Dr Alan Sabrosky

[Ognir]

Dr. Alan Sabrosky to be interviewed early next week by the Ogster & Daryl

Get your questions in here  

[Wimpy]

Wow!

I am excited about his efforts but am a little leery of his ancestry, maybe you and Daryl could smoke out any potential tribal identity and indoctrination he carries.  Poke him with a stick a few times and wait for a response.

[Christopher Marlowe]

1) Sabrosky's latest comments have been interpreted as meaning that "the US Military KNOWS that israel did 9/11". Can the Dr. give any sort of estimate as to what percentage of active/inactive military are aware of israel's involvement? Rank of General? colonel? Major?
2) Are there any branches of the military who are more/less knowledgeable of israel's involvement?
3) Another recent video, similar to that one featuring Dr. Sobrosky, states that US intelligence services are also aware of israel's involvement.  Does the Dr. know how many current members of the US intelligence community are aware of israel's involvement?
How many retired members? Case managers or operatives? Foreign Intelligence awareness?
4) Given the knowledge of the military and/or intelligence services, why is it that so few have come forward after 8 years?
5) Are there resources available exclusively to the military/intelligence which point to israeli involvement in 9/11? e.g. Did the  FBI confiscate videos of passengers boarding the aircraft on 9/11? (Daniel Lewin on flight 11- Did he have a hijacking crew?) What about the pentagon videos? Wreckage from the crash sites: serial numbers from the landing gear? What measures are being taken to preserve this evidence?
6) What do israelis love more: killing children or drinking blood?
7) To what extent are the branches of the military/intelligence under the control of israel? How much of this is political and how much of this is direct control? i.e. officers with dual loyalty.
How long has Dr. Sabrosky been aware of israel's involvement?
9) Is israel aware of the military/intelligence's awareness? i.e. Do they know we know? And do we know they know we know?
10) Does Dr. Sabrosky think that any people in government are aware of israel's involvement? Follow up: isn't awareness without action a form of treason?
11) Does Dr. Sabrosky believe israel would actually implement the Sampson option? Are israeli security firms in charge of nuclear weapons? Could israel use the US nuclear weapons as part of the Sampson option?
12) Is the reluctance on the part of the US leadership to point the finger at israel based on this Sampson threat, or is their fear merely political?
13) Could members of the military/intelligence gather irrefutable/direct evidence of israeli involvement in 9/11 and publish this information on the internet?
14) Given our current political climate of widespread treason by members of Congress, is it possible that members of the military could carry out some sort of arrest and criminal prosecution of Congress?

[Tomas O'Crohan]

Is the United States Military going to join with us, the armed American population, in physically driving out, capturing and prosecuting this criminal organization that now masquerades as "the government" and will it further assist us in the full restoration of the Constitution or do we, the armed American population, need to consider the military as a part of this criminal organization that we need to extirpate?

[memory hole]

great! cantr wait to hear you and Daryl interview him.

The only way we can beat this zio- crimewave is to get the military on board . period.

I would like to know do the "men on the ground" i/e the young soldiers have any idea about Israel and 9/11, or is it only higher up the military hierarchy?

[maz]

A lot of criticism from Zionist deniers stemmed from Dr. Sabrosky's exclaimation that "Israel did 9/11," but the only evidence they say he offered to support that charge was the WTC 7-Jewenko video.

We all know what the evidence is, but it would be nice if, for the record, he could clarify exactly what evidence he has been showing the military, and what evidence he feels the strongest that suggest that "Israel did 9/11."

[LordLindsey]

Noel, I absolutely concur regarding the point that showing evidence of controlled-demolition does NOTHING to "prove" that Israel is responsible for all of this--so what OTHER evidence did Dr. Sabrosky provide that he didn't mention in the interview?  I will only add that it is important that you bring-up the revelation that Rep. McKinney made regarding the absolute treason with the congress and senate because what HE says and what SHE says(d) go hand-in-hand to show that those in-power DO know what is happening and are doing nothing about it.

Upon reflection, I DO have another point that I wanted to make.  If there are more than just a few generals within the military apparatus who KNOW the truth about what is happening across the planet, why hasn't there been ANY REAL MOVE by those who know to stop what is happening and come-forward to absolutely make it known to the world that all of this SHIT that is being smeared across our planet is being done by design?  Why are there not hundreds-upon-hundreds of Dr. Sabrosky's across this planet speaking-up and doing anything to bring real awareness of the danger that this planet faces the longer the plans of these psycho/sociopaths is allowed to continue?  I want a straight-answer to this question because, with all of the evidence available, there IS ABSOLUTELY NO MORE EXCUSE TO NOT KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING AND WHAT THE END RESULT IS GOING TO BE.

LINDSEY

[Rockclimber]

A lot of criticism from Zionist deniers stemmed from Dr. Sabrosky's exclaimation that "Israel did 9/11," but the only evidence they say he offered to support that charge was the WTC 7-Jewenko video.

We all know what the evidence is, but it would be nice if, for the record, he could clarify exactly what evidence he has been showing the military, and what evidence he feels the strongest that suggest that "Israel did 9/11."

In this in regards to that thread at the prisonplanet forum? It's funny, but how many times did 'agentblue..." and grapecrusher ignore that evidence and on purpose? The link to "Israel did 9-11" was posted at least twice in that thread.  Sabrosky knows the evidence is out there and probably felt like he was preaching to the choir and I'm sure he can qualify the evidence.a The evidence is overwhelming, but I suspect these guys at PP are just sayanim and they're already trying to minimize Sabrosky. Ask them where there evidence is that proves it was exclusively the US government and CIA? You can also point them in the direction of Missing Links but I think there going to deny any evidence you throw at them. They're put there to squash and suppress this info in the same way that Jones does.

[Rockclimber]

Piggybacking off of Christopher Marlowe's question:

12) Is the reluctance on the part of the US leadership to point the finger at israel based on this Sampson threat, or is their fear merely political?

Perhaps you could also ask this or something similar:  

There has been some talk of nuclear blackmail. Is there any truth to this in your opinion? We know that the samson option shows just how evil they are-- "if we go down, everyone is going with us", however there has been talk about nuclear blackmail. Is this part of the hold that Israel has over the United States and other zionist puppet nations?

Source:

http://rense.com/general88/vanu.htm

http://www.rense.com/general35/isrnuk.htm

[Ognir]

Interview 24 hours away
post your comments or questions

[Large Sarge]

in the dec-Jan publication of Armed forces Journal
contained an article: "True Transformation: Americas military is overdue for a dramatic overhaul"'

in the article is suggests "responsible dissent is encouraged by all those in uniform"

and that the military has a responsibilty to act as a check and balannce against power hungry politicians, and political lobbies (foreing interests)

this is reportedly the best read publication by all the staff officers in all the armed services

it has been around since 1863

some folks called this article a "call for mutiny"

is it a call for mutiny against the zionist traitors?

a return to the constitution?

[LordLindsey]

The interview is taking-place now, so all that can be said is good luck and God bless.

LINDSEY

[Christopher Marlowe]

I listened to the interview and it was okay. DBS is so used to people not "getting it" that I think he kind of jumps the gun expecting people to be confrontational. Maybe DBS is concerned that people will think he's turned into a fawning p*ssy, and DBS is anxious to show that he is still getting the message gets out.

But Sabrosky gets it. There were two points where DBS felt like he had to disagree and both times I think DBS actually missed the subtle distinctions to Sabrosky's answer.

1) Sabrosky said that one of israshit-hole's major concerns was the public impression of the Palestinian problem. (Or something like that.) DBS said that israhell was really planning to take over the world. Sabrosky pointed out that he did not disagree with DBS, and that "concerns" and "long term plans" (or some similar terms) were not the same thing. The concerns Sabrosky was discussing were those immediate problems that could possibly interfere with israhell's long term plans.

2) Sabrosky said that if McCain won we would have attacked Iran already. DBS said that there was no difference between the two parties in the US. I think the subtle difference that was missed here was between the constituencies of the two parties. By and large, I agree that the parties are the same, but the constituencies are not.  This can be seen by the pretend news shows that appeal to each spectrum.  On the right, you have Fox noise, which is constantly pushing for war with Iran, and loves the war in Iraq.  On the left, you have MSNBC, which is making people afraid of Iran, and talks about the Al Qaeda boogie man, but also has stories about ending the war. So while both parties and all the MSM are for war, the people who watch MSNBC are mostly against the war, IMHO.  It will be more difficult to bring them to attack Iran.  So I think Sabrosky was right. If McCain had been elected, it might have been war by now. (Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran. Remember that?)  

Although Sabrosky has been late in coming to the party, and perhaps he is not as well informed as DBS on the entire history of criminal zionism, he appears to know that the holohoax was a load of crap, and that the zionists are running the show.  It would be a mistake to think that Sabrosky is an idiot.  He's a very thoughtful guy, and he is very capable of explaining what he thinks and why he thinks that way.  It would be a good idea to listen to him very carefully. Also, Sabrosky has a lot of expertise in military tactics and sh*t like that.  Instead of just interviewing him to find out if he agrees with you, how about tapping into his knowledge? e.g. Sabrosky said that the veterans and military groups are a huge political force in this country.  How can we influence them?  How can we get them on our side?  

DBS is probably wary about talking to new people, and his shill alert is on high, but I think Sabrosky is the real deal.  I remember when DBS talked to other people who looked like they were ready to confront criminal zionism, but as soon as DBS got into the nitty gritty, they split. (Ray McGovern, Ralph Nader, etc....) Those guys were kinda of p*ssies to do that.  But Sabrosky didn't back away.

I was also a little disappointed that there wasn't more meat, but when Ognir started the interview they said that Sabrosky was saving a lot of his revelations for some of the articles he is currently writing.  I guess I will have to wait.  

I sound critical of Ognir and DBS, but I'm still a big fan!  Keep up the good work guys!

[Ognir]

No offense taken