Dr. Laura Schlessenger's on air rant about n*ggers!

[maz]

Dear Abraham Foxman,

Another member of the International Entitlement Club of the Chosen People has gone on to, what some have concluded to be, a racist rant on broadcast radio. Will you and other anti-racist organizations call for her to lose her job, or will you use your selective outrage option and pretend that it didn't happen?

http://tv.gawker.com/5611670/dr-laura-a ... radio-rant

Yesterday, Dr. Laura Schlessenger shocked her radio show audience when she argued with a black woman about racism and—among other things—said the word "nigger" six times. Today, Schlessenger apologized for her incredibly offensive rant. Audio and transcripts, inside.

Here's audio of Schlessenger's original rant, which happened during a discussion with a black female caller who thought her white husband's friends were racist (the most shocking moment of which included Schlessenger saying angrily, "Black guys use it all the time. Turn on HBO and listen to a black comic, and all you hear is nigger, nigger, nigger. I don't get it. If anybody without enough melanin says it, it's a horrible thing. But when black people say it, it's affectionate."

[Christopher Marlowe]

I listened to the audio and I agree with Dr. Laura.

She said that blacks are allowed to say "nigger", but whites are not.

And sometimes I just desperately want to say "nigger".  I don't want to call anybody a "nigger".  I just want to say it.

I go home sometimes, and you know what I do? I  go to my room and close the door. And I stick my face into my pillow. And I say "nigger", softly, so no one will hear.

There.  I just did it.

I love it so much, to say "nigger". I think it's the double g's that I like most. And the soft "i".  "Bigger" is good.  But "nigger" is better.  

I want to say it when I'm alone in my car. But I'm afraid someone will read my lips.

"Excuse me. What did you say?"
"Huh? Me? I said, uhm, "Neat, girl.""

I envy black people so much.  They can say "nigger" all they want. I listen sometimes, jealous of them.  They say it so good. It sounds so sweet rolling off their tongues.

"Nigger, I told you not to sit on my damn car!"
"Aw, nigger please!"

Of course they say it better because they have more practice.  If I could say "nigger", I would get good at it too.  Really good. I think someday, I could perhaps be one of the best. Sigh.

[Negentropic]

Howard Stern did that kind of stuff for decades and all he would do was pay an FCC fine, now and then and go back to making 20 million dollars a year.  He would try to say nigger as many times as he could get away with 'in character,' that way he always had plausible deniablity of it being his own opinions. But he would say 'chink' or 'gook' or 'nip' or 'jap' in his own character all the time, no problem, since that's allowed in a way, just like 'white trash.'  I remember in the early '90s he used to have a black guy on who wore an 'X' Malcolm X cap and he would call this guy 'Malcolm X-crement.'

[youtube:17b4h6jd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9aXNmuC8Yc[/youtube]17b4h6jd]

It's just a goddamn word, if people can't say 'black trash' when referring to trashy or low-life blacks the way they say 'white trash' all the time on national TV then they should be able to say 'those niggers over there' and not be guilty of being racist automatically, since they only mean the 'black trash' and and not all blacks.  Chris Rock said it best in that famous comedy routine he did a few years ago 'I love black people, but I hate niggers.'  At the end of the hbo video for that there's a small segment where some white fans come up to him and say the same thing and Chris Rock kicks their ass, meaning I can say it because I'm black but you guys can't, you guys can only think it to yourselves or say it among yourselves."  About a year ago, I was trying to hire somebody for a packing job and one of the guys who applied was a hipanic dude from Los Angeles and he couldn't take the job because he lived too far away but he said he had a friend living 10 minutes away who might be interested. He called this guy up in my presence and he says: "Yeah Nigga, get your ass over here and you got a job!"  I thought it was just one of these post-gangsta-rap white or hispanic or Asian guys calling each other 'niggas' in a friendly way kind of thing you hear all the time. Then the guy shows up the next day and he was a black guy!  So a black guy was friendly enough with a Hispanic dude to tolerate him calling him a 'nigga' in a friendly way (impersonating the way blacks often talk to each other) in front of others.   It's all in the personality and the way you say it and who you say it to and how friendly you are with the person and how well they know you. If that same guy says it to a stranger he's definitely risking an ass-whupping.  


[youtube:17b4h6jd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui6-Wc0PDc4[/youtube]17b4h6jd]

[youtube:17b4h6jd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZCS5I80X-8[/youtube]17b4h6jd]

Dustin Hoffman as Lenny Bruce in The Bob Fosse film "Lenny"  
[youtube:17b4h6jd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOnkv76rNL4[/youtube]17b4h6jd]


[youtube:17b4h6jd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lep335-OrN8[/youtube]17b4h6jd]

[maz]

I listened to the audio and I agree with Dr. Laura.

She said that blacks are allowed to say "nigger", but whites are not.

And sometimes I just desperately want to say "nigger".  I don't want to call anybody a "nigger".  I just want to say it.

I go home sometimes, and you know what I do? I  go to my room and close the door. And I stick my face into my pillow. And I say "nigger", softly, so no one will hear.

There.  I just did it.

I love it so much, to say "nigger". I think it's the double g's that I like most. And the soft "i".  "Bigger" is good.  But "nigger" is better.  

I want to say it when I'm alone in my car. But I'm afraid someone will read my lips.

"Excuse me. What did you say?"
"Huh? Me? I said, uhm, "Neat, girl.""

I envy black people so much.  They can say "nigger" all they want. I listen sometimes, jealous of them.  They say it so good. It sounds so sweet rolling off their tongues.

"Nigger, I told you not to sit on my damn car!"
"Aw, nigger please!"

Of course they say it better because they have more practice.  If I could say "nigger", I would get good at it too.  Really good. I think someday, I could perhaps be one of the best. Sigh.

The funny thing is that now blacks and Jews apparently can say nigger, but you whites still can't or you'll be called racist  :lol:

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Well, there is always a "Jew saying 'N*gger' in the underpaid, contractor cut and spot-market speculated  'Forestry Products'  Pile", IMHO... like Peter Schiff  ?   :lol:

[maz]

Well 'ol Abe read my post and decided to chime in (I can't find the link now but I read it last night) so here's the scoop: The ADL is not going to call Dr. Laura a racist like they did Mel Gibson for basically the same thing, probably because of her chosen status, but they do not approve of the use of the n-word in general.

The funny thing is that they are going let America decide whether Dr. Laura is banned from radio lol, and they are not going to call for a general boycott of the radio station or its advertising like they did to Oliver Stone.

So in sum Christopher Marlowe you really don't have the go-ahead from the ADL to use the n-word, but I guess there are some strides being made in that direction! At least we have been made aware the grievances about the double standards over who can use the n-word and who can't!

Ok all sillyness aside, I myself being of mixed ethnicty and raised in a black-oriented household we were forbidden to use the n-word and I remember some of the neighborhoods kids coming over one day and one of them happened to call playfully another kid a nigga like the comedians do and my uncle whipped off his belt and beat the shit out of that kid. It was hilarious at the time and all the neighborhood got a good laugh out of it. No fights between parents lawsuits ect... Many blacks, especially middle-upper class black families used to raise their families this way. Just thought I'd share that!

[Christopher Marlowe]

Ok all sillyness aside, I myself being of mixed ethnicty and raised in a black-oriented household we were forbidden to use the n-word and I remember some of the neighborhoods kids coming over one day and one of them happened to call playfully another kid a nigga like the comedians do and my uncle whipped off his belt and beat the shit out of that kid. It was hilarious at the time and all the neighborhood got a good laugh out of it. No fights between parents lawsuits ect... Many blacks, especially middle-upper class black families used to raise their families this way. Just thought I'd share that!

Wow! Let me get this straight: You're uncle spanked a neighbor's kid with a belt?

Yeah, those days are past. That would be a total lawsuit today. And probably criminal charges.

I wouldn't want a neighbor beating my kid, but if it was an unspoken/accepted rule that parents had a duty to keep an eye on the neighbor's kid, then that's another thing.

Kids need discipline.

Of course, I don't actually have a kid. I only have a hypothetical kid. He is very well behaved and gets straight A's.  

My mom used to spank out bottoms with a hair-brush. All the hair-brushes in the house had broken handles.  My dad spank us with his bare hand, but sometimes he would slap us on the top of our heads. He had this big gold ring with a black opal in it.  And they say gold is a soft metal.....

[Negentropic]

I just stumbled on this very interesting section of a Mel Gibson article written by Tim on his blog that should be relevant to some of the ramblings   on this thread:  

http://fitzinformer.blogspot.com/2010/07/crucifixion-of-mel-gibson.html

I said I'd prove it, so here goes.

This is about "the N word"? What a laugh. First off, this was a private conversation, which is nobody's else's business. And it took place in the heat of passion. What man in his right mind wouldn't be upset about the mother of his infant child running around dressed provocatively? Everyone talks differently when they're extremely angry, even liberals. And Mel Gibson never used the word about anybody but potential rapists. Since when do rapists deserve respect? Contrast this to the reaction to Bill Clinton's racial insult of Obama. When Ted Kennedy refused his request to endorse Hillary for president instead of Obama, Clinton angrily retorted that "a few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee." But that's okay, because Bill Clinton never made a film about Jesus Christ, so he gets away with that sort of thing.

Secondly, I'm sick and tired of hearing about how horrible "the N word" supposedly is. It's nothing but the Latin word for black, as anyone with half a brain knows:

Nigger is a noun in the English language, most notable for its usage in a pejorative context to refer to black people (generally people of African descent), and also as an informal slang term, among other contexts. It is a common ethnic slur. The word originated as a term used in a neutral context to refer to black people, as a variation of the Spanish/Portuguese noun negro, a descendant of the Latin adjective niger, meaning the color "black".

That's all it means. That's all it's ever meant. It's even in the Bible, for crying out loud! Yes, it only has one G, but that's how the word was spelled back in King James' day, and and it has the very same meaning.

Moreover, "Acts of the Apostles" – in the New / Second Testament – mentions at least one black who was officiating as prophet and teacher in the early Christian church at Antioch: "Among the prophets and teachers of the church at Antioch were Barnabas and Symeon ( also called "The Black Man"), Lucius ( from Cyrene), Manaen ( the foster-brother of King Herod), and Paul – The Holy Bible, Living Bible Edition, Pocket Edition, International Bible Society, Tyndale House Publishers, 1995. In one German translation of the New / Second Testament, by Ulrich Wilken, published by Furche – Verlag of Hamburg, Germany, in 1970, this Symeon bears the nickname "< der Neger>" in German, meaning "the negro" in English. However, a number of versions in German, French and English read: " [...] Simon called Niger".

The reason it became a "bad" word is because of the behavior and lifestyle of the people it referred to. They're the ones who turned the word into an insult, not white people. Just as the word that replaced it, "colored", became pejorative after it was associated with black people, and was replaced by "Negro", which became a "bad" word after years of news announcers saying "police are looking for two Negro males", and was replaced by "black", which has now become yet another bad word because of the behavior of people it refers to, and has been replaced with "African-American", which will no doubt be declared "racist" itself in a few years.

[Christopher Marlowe]

The reason it became a "bad" word is because of the behavior and lifestyle of the people it referred to. They're the ones who turned the word into an insult, not white people.

I thought a lot of that post made sense when I read it, but the above quote didn't really sit right. It's not really true.

In the context that Chris Rock uses "nigger", it's true.  

But in another sense, white people used to own black people. They used to beat them and mistreat them, and use blacks like property. In that context, "nigger" can mean disrespect: that the black man is "less than" the white man.

And in that context, it's not really true that black people are the ones to blame to blame for making themselves the lowest class by getting into those slaveships and deciding to pick all that cotton.  I mean, they're partially to blame because, uh, they were running around Africa instead of learning how to make guns.  That's definitely their fault.  

I don't say that white people shouldn't "be allowed"  to use "nigger", but I would be cautious about using it because I wouldn't want to hurt anyone's feelings. Even if I was mad at a black man, I wouldn't call him a "nigger" because I would be saying that he is less than me because of the color of his skin. And I don't believe that, and it's a cheap shot.

The "behavior and lifestyle of the people it referred to" could just as easily be "poor white trash" people: poor, ignorant people raised in broken homes where there is often some sort of addiction.  The children coming from these homes are so messed up that they develop poor self-esteem and bad attitudes very early on, so that by the time we meet them they are very angry and rude.  And easy to hate.

And we love to hate people who are ignorant and don't know how to behave. It's so easy to feel superior.

I was talking to a guy yesterday, and he was saying that labor unions caused the downfall of the auto industry in the US.  And while there was certainly some corruption and mismanagement on the part of union leaders, were the unions to blame for crap GM has been putting out for 40 years? Their foreign subsidiaries were making much better autos. How can he blame the design of the car on the guy who is putting the car together?

And on Faux News, they love to blame all of the US economic problems on the people who bought houses they couldn't afford. Sure, that is one small part of the problem, but big banks and derivatives are much more at fault.

What is it about our society that wants to put the blame on the people with the least amount of power? The ignorant masses are behaving exactly the way their rich overlords planned it. I don't mean to say that I am any big fan of ignorant gang-bangers, or rap music, or pants dragging on the ground. But the reason WHY that society has become so dominated by prison culture is because so many of their men are in prison. And while there are some who would make the case that blacks are just more likely to go to prison, are we going to make the same excuse when masses of white people are herded into FEMA camps? Must we invent racist excuses for the economic oppression of people?

Don't let it be said that people should not be held accountable for their actions, but I believe there has been a purposeful degradation of the culture, morals, and the standard of living in the US. This degradation will continue, and it will be reflected in more unemployment, more broken homes, more drug addiction, crime and despicable gangsta lifestyle.  More people to hate, and more people to blame.

[Ognir]

Dr. Laura Schlessinger Quits Radio Show Amidst N-Word Controversy

http://hiphopwired.com/2010/08/18/dr-la ... ntroversy/

[Negentropic]

Christopher Marlow wrote:
I don't say that white people shouldn't "be allowed" to use "nigger", but I would be cautious about using it because I wouldn't want to hurt anyone's feelings. Even if I was mad at a black man, I wouldn't call him a "nigger" because I would be saying that he is less than me because of the color of his skin. And I don't believe that, and it's a cheap shot.

The "behavior and lifestyle of the people it referred to" could just as easily be "poor white trash" people: poor, ignorant people raised in broken homes where there is often some sort of addiction. The children coming from these homes are so messed up that they develop poor self-esteem and bad attitudes very early on, so that by the time we meet them they are very angry and rude. And easy to hate.

And we love to hate people who are ignorant and don't know how to behave. It's so easy to feel superior.

I was talking to a guy yesterday, and he was saying that labor unions caused the downfall of the auto industry in the US. And while there was certainly some corruption and mismanagement on the part of union leaders, were the unions to blame for crap GM has been putting out for 40 years? Their foreign subsidiaries were making much better autos. How can he blame the design of the car on the guy who is putting the car together?

And on Faux News, they love to blame all of the US economic problems on the people who bought houses they couldn't afford. Sure, that is one small part of the problem, but big banks and derivatives are much more at fault.

What is it about our society that wants to put the blame on the people with the least amount of power? The ignorant masses are behaving exactly the way their rich overlords planned it. I don't mean to say that I am any big fan of ignorant gang-bangers, or rap music, or pants dragging on the ground. But the reason WHY that society has become so dominated by prison culture is because so many of their men are in prison. And while there are some who would make the case that blacks are just more likely to go to prison, are we going to make the same excuse when masses of white people are herded into FEMA camps? Must we invent racist excuses for the economic oppression of people?

Reality does enter into it also. If the crime statistics show a hugely disproportional number of black-on-white crime than white-on-black or even white-on-white crime and blacks are in the minority and 'white trash' or poor whites still exist and are just as poor as whites in many instances, then you'd be a fool not ask why and ascribe it all to 400 years of racism. As far as I know in the 1950s and before there was no such disproportional number of blacks committing crimes. Someone told them and the blacks in South Africa subliminally  that it was now open season on whites and
you blacks were justified because of what whites did to you in the past.  

Context is crucial, just like George Carlin says in that bit. That's why, for example, in the context of the horrific reports of black-on-white murders Curt Maynard used to post on his site before he got offed (by his own hand or by other hands, we'll never know, there was never an investigation, only a statement of 'facts' and 'witnesses' to local media), using the word 'nigger' many times and  calling the perpetrators this 'future neurosurgeon' and such, which basically implied that no black person could possibly become a neurosurgeon, seemed completely justified and right.  No decent person in their right minds will in the least bit care about a few racial slurs in the context of the fact that the particular animals who committed those horrific crimes were blacks and that it was not the first time or the hundredth time such crimes were committed and not reported on by the Jew-controlled press.  Just imagine if the white victims were your daughter or sister or girlfriend or wife or mother or grandmother and then imagine you yourself not calling them 'fucking niggers' at least ten times and you will have more control over your emotions than 99.9% of humans who ever lived; then you might see that the reporter's feeling part of that outrage vicariously and using slurs in that same context also becomes fully justified.  Hence, why guys like Mark Glenn and Phil Tourney and also many people at TIU, myself included, did not necessarily consider Maynard a bad guy, just a righteously pissed-off white guy.  

[Anonymous]

despicable gangsta lifestyle

crime statistics

One group in America willing to kill and die over material goals (cars, clothes, money, hoes, drugs) is "Niggas".

drug addiction

We Niggas embrace Gluttony like whoa!! I should know!!

Fuck pussies getting emotional about a fucking word; the fact we are even discussing this shit shows how fucked up shit is. I can't even preach to certain fucking Niggas about information. Ignorance is fucking bliss over here! I can't point real Niggas I fuck with to a TiU or iamthewitness.

[abduLMaria]

Dr. Laura Schlessinger Quits Radio Show Amidst N-Word Controversy

http://hiphopwired.com/2010/08/18/dr-la ... ntroversy/

what will we do without her sterling advice ?

i remember one show where she jumped down the throat of an Asian American woman who wasn't great at speaking English, who was also kind of nervous.

i'm not sure what protects her show from a malpractice lawsuit.  she insists on being called a "doctor".  but i would have to say she blows about every third call.

when i drive, all there is is AM radio, and that's where she resides.  or resided.

[§N9sh2bj]

white people used to own black people

I'm certain these were at least privately-claiming 'j-tribe' (or at minimum illuminist) adherents who did the 'owning'.
Then after the 'north (jew) war of agression' they expanded the 'owning' to everyone through the invention of the U.S. Citizen.
Now everyone who knew nothing could be owned! (as a way of financing purported debt)
What an improvement (rolleyes).

[Christopher Marlowe]

Then after the 'north (jew) war of agression' they expanded the 'owning' to everyone through the invention of the U.S. Citizen.

From Wikipedia:
Judah Philip Benjamin (August 6, 1811 – May 6, 1884) was an American politician and lawyer. He was born a British subject in the West Indies, became a citizen of the United States and then the Confederate States of America. After the collapse of the Confederacy, he settled in England and died in France.

During his career in U.S. politics, Benjamin was a member of the Louisiana House of Representatives and a U.S. Senator from Louisiana; he was the second Jewish senator in U.S. history. Following the formation of the Confederate States of America, he held three different Cabinet posts in the government of Jefferson Davis. He was the first Jewish Cabinet-member in a North American government, and the first Jew seriously considered for nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court (he declined an offer of nomination twice). Following his relocation to Europe, he was a distinguished barrister and Queen's Counsel in the United Kingdom....

Davis appointed Benjamin to be the first Attorney General of the Confederacy on February 25, 1861, remarking later that he chose him because he "had a very high reputation as a lawyer, and my acquaintance with him in the Senate had impressed me with the lucidity of his intellect, his systematic habits, and capacity for labor." Benjamin has been often referred to as "the Brains of the Confederacy."

In September 1861, he became the acting Secretary of War, and in November he was confirmed in the post. He became a lightning-rod for popular discontent with the Confederacy's military situation, and quarrelled with the Confederate Generals P.G.T. Beauregard and Stonewall Jackson. This came to a head over the loss of Roanoke Island to the Union "without a fight" in February 1862....

As a reward for his loyalty, Davis appointed him Secretary of State in March 1862. His foremost goal as Secretary of State was to draw the United Kingdom into the war on the side of the Confederacy....

In the immediate aftermath of the end of the war, Benjamin was rumoured to have masterminded the assassination of Abraham Lincoln through his intelligence apparatus (based out of Montreal, Canada: John Wilkes Booth was purportedly seen several times meeting with Confederate representatives and receiving funds from them). Fearing that he could never receive a fair trial in the atmosphere of the time, he burnt his papers, took refuge at Gamble Plantation in Florida and then fled to England under a false name.

From: Iamthewitness
http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Arno ... .House.htm
Napoleon III.'s idea was to establish a new Empire by acquiring Mexico and some of the Southern United States, and he wanted Britain to come in with him to compel the North to abandon the blockade of the Southern ports. The South (the Confederates), hard-pressed, were trying to secure Napoleon III.'s intervention in their favour, which they hoped to get by offering him some territory, viz.: Louisiana and Texas. The Confederate Government had the Jew Judah P. Benjamin as their Secretary of State, and the Jewish Encyclopædia (B, Vol. III., p. 30) removes all doubt as to what was going on, for it says:

    "Unfortunately a thorough study of the diplomacy of the Confederacy has not yet been published, nor any adequate biography of Benjamin, of which that would be the principal chapter. But by such a publication it would be shown how near the Confederacy came to securing European intervention — particularly through the aid of Napoleon III. — by the tempting and statesmanlike efforts of the Confederate State Department under Benjamin's direction, and to the probable transformation of an insurrection into a successful revolution in consequence."

That Benjamin had, before the Civil War, actually conversed with Napoleon at Biarritz on this very subject of a French Dominion in America is revealed in Clew's Fifty Years in Wall Street (Z.3, p. 62).

Aided by Jewish loans, through the Credit Mobilier and backed by the Pereira firm, Napoleon's nominee, Maximilian of Austria, landed in Mexico in 1864 to become its short-lived Emperor. But the plot failed. Britain would not play her part. The man who prevented it was Tsar Alexander II. of Russia! He sent his fleet, such as it was, across the ocean and put it at Abraham Lincoln's disposal, so that the British and French knew that if they attempted to carry out the scheme of Napoleon III., they would find themselves engaged in hostilities with Russia. This bit of secret history has never been allowed to become public property. At the time, the Tsar himself did not advertise it because, immediately afterwards, he was forced by the European situation to make friends with Napoleon III. That the Russian fleet was in American waters at the time, under the command of the Tsar's brother, and was "invited" by Secretary Seward, and that this prevented France and Britain from carrying out their plans is confirmed by Clews (Z.3, p. 59). Clews regarded the presence of the Russian fleet as a lucky incident, but the British and French Government obviously considered it was deliberate.

Now what did the Rothschilds want? Their desires may be estimated fairly accurately by quoting the opinion given by Disraeli on the future of America when the Civil War was over:—"It will be an America of armies, of diplomacy, of rival States and manoeuvering Cabinets, of frequent turbulence, and probably of frequent wars." (Annual Register, 1863, N.S. cv. 21). Disraeli was Lionel Rothschild's mouth-piece. The Rothschilds wished to reproduce in America the chaotic conditions obtaining in Europe whereby they ruled all States; a united America would be too powerful for them; it must be split, and now was the time to do it, but it was awkward that Napoleon III. would not work with them! What were they to do? There was only one answer. Support both sides and prevent a win outright for either side, and so force apart the North and the South, with the possibility of the North becoming annexed to Canada. In practice, this meant helping the weak South more than the strong North.

That was what the British Government actually did; in spite of much liberal sentiment in sympathy with the North, British policy veered round in favour of the South, and the Confederacy was recognised by it and assisted directly by allowing ships to be built, fitted and even manned for it in British ports; so much so, that, as is well known, Britain had subsequently to pay damages for the activities of the Alabama and Florida on the high seas.

August Belmont in New York supported the North "with the greatest vigour." "His most valuable service, perhaps, was a constant correspondence with influential friends in Europe, the Rothschilds and others, in which he set forcibly the Northern side in the great conflict." (Z.4, Vol. II., p. 170). The Encyclopædia Britannica (R, Vol. III., p. 710) also says that he energetically supported the Union and exerted his influence on financiers in England and France in support of the North. Lionel Rothschild thought that the North would win, says Roth (L).

Meanwhile, the other Rothschilds invested heavily in the bonds of the South and so ultimately of course incurred heavy losses. (B, Vol. X., p. 496).

The Rothschilds, I repeat, backed both sides, their material interests being on both sides, and their political interests requiring a long war and a stalemate, which could only be produced by giving more help to the South than to the North.

Had August Belmont any contacts with Judah P. Benjamin, the Jew who was first Attorney-General, then Secretary for War, and finally Secretary of the Confederate Government? I find he had. Belmont's wife, a Gentile, had an uncle John Slidell (1793-1871), a partner in the law firm of Slidell, Benjamin & Conrad, in Louisiana, and of which Judah P. Benjamin was also a partner! This can hardly be a coincidence; it was obviously Cohen-cadence! Further, Slidell was one of the two commissaries that the Confederacy sent to France to purchase munitions and arrange for supplies, shipping and other help for the South. Slidell was on familiar terms with Napoleon III. (Z.3, p.p. 60-68), and approved of Napoleon's Mexican Adventure. (Z.4). His daughter married Baron Frederick Emil D'Erlanger, head of the Jew banking firm in Paris, whose father, Baron Raphael Erlanger of Frankfort had been confidential representative of the Rothschilds. The Erlanger firm financed the Confederates (Confederate States of America, by J. C. Schwab, p. 102, New York, 1901) and I have no doubt were assisted by their patrons the Rothschilds, who could do nothing openly because of Napoleon III.'s hearty distrust of them. The Erlangers were also agents for the Credit Mobilier, Rothschilds' rivals.

Abraham Lincoln tried to introduce State Loans to free the people of America from the clutches of the bankers. We need not be surprised therefore that August Belmont "strongly opposed the nomination and election of Lincoln." (Z.4, Vol. II.). Lincoln financed the Civil War on state credit, and for that he was murdered in 1865 by the Jewish actor Booth. This Booth was neither a Southerner nor ever owned a slave (A New American History, by W. E. Woodward, 1938, p. 475). An attempt to murder Seward was made the same evening; Seward was the man who gave the invitation to the Russian fleet. An attempt against the Tsar himself was made in Paris in the following year and in 1881 he was blown to pieces by a bomb. Lincoln, Seward and the Tsar were the three people who had chiefly prevented the Jewish partition of the United States!

[Whaler]

I remember my mother used to listen to this hag way back in the 90's. I remember long painful car rides home as I listened to "adult babies"(helphand) bitch and moan about minor flaws in their spouse's personality. Dr. Laura is a bitch....and she's a slut. I'm surprised nobody has posted these pictures yet. One of Dr Laura's jilted lover's posted naked pics of her on the internet about 10 years ago.



Dr. Susan Block's
Dr. Laura Diaries (continued)

October 28, 1998
http://www.drsusanblock.com/editorial/drlaura5.htm

Wherein I Get the Privilege of
Gazing Upon Dr. Laura's Missing
Nipples, Bush and Tanlines
And, Since I'm Now Publishing Hers,
Feel Obliged to Publish My Own
Old Nude Photos

A guy on the web named "DMan" seems to have downloaded the nude photos of Dr. Laura from IEG's site in those initial early morning, pre-injunction hours, because he e-mailed them to Tod Hunter at AVN who just e-mailed them to me. Wow. Now I have the privilege of gazing upon Dr. Laura the Prophet's pert little nipples, generous auburn bush and rather pronounced tanlines. Much better than with those ugly black censorship bars and balls covering her body like cybergraphic instruments of sadomasochism. It's amazing how excited everyone is to see Dr. Laura naked! We're all acting like little kids who caught the strictest teacher in the school with her panties down. Max announced the arrival of the uncensored photos on the intercom, and Lavonne and I went running and giggling from my office into the Computer Room to see them. Tim immediately turned them into a screen saver for his computer. Max made a collage out of them and framed it. Other e-mails from friends rushed in: "Great news about your nemesis!" "The thundering moral conscience of America is on the Web IN HER BIRTHDAY SUIT!" "Found the Pics of Dr. Laura Doing the 11th Stupid Thing Women Do to Mess Up Their Lives" and "Nude Photos of Dr. Whore-A-Yes! There is a God."

We ogled her nakedness for hours. Lavonne, who's posed nude for professional photographers, criticized some of the shots that do not show Laura's body to its best advantage. Max and I agreed that since these pictures were not professional, but "pseudo-professional," they must not be judged by professional standards.

"She looks very hot, very sexy," declared Max, no fan of Dr. L., but a connoisseur of amateur sex snapshots since he started publishing them in the LA Star, Love and Finger a couple decades ago (actually, around the same time that Laura was posing and "thrashing around like jack rabbits" with Bill). "They look like swinger photos," said Max, "like the amateur porn shots they use to advertise for sex partners."

Swingers or not, most people, especially women, get nude pictures of themselves taken at some point in their lives, often in their late twenties, usually by a photographer who's also an illicit lover, or voyeuristic admirer. The late twenties is the classic time for amateur nude photos, as you're mature enough to be proud of your sexuality, but still young enough to feel in your prime.

As Laura's lover Bill recalls, "She was wandering around my apartment naked, as she often did, and admiring her very fine figure in the mirror...She said, "I'd like you to take some photographs of me the way I am now at the age of 28 so that I can look back one day and see that this is the way I once was." Well, now you can look back, Dr. Laura. We can all look back.

Not that there's anything wrong with that, so quit whining about it! You knew what you were doing when you modeled in the buff for a lover who was not your current husband. As Max said, "Anyone who poses for nude photos knows that the photographer is going to keep copies, and at some point, other people will see them."

"Hey, there's only 10 pictures here!" Lavonne. noticed, "I thought this was Dr. Laura's Dirty Dozen."

Max smiled knowingly. "That's because they're holding back the kinkiest stuff. Like, you know there's got to be a fellatio shot. They'll release that later."

Lasciviously, we speculated on the possibilities, as our eyes traveled over Laura's peaks and valleys, curves and crevices. "Aren't amateur naked pictures great?" said Max. "

I remember when I had my first naked pictures taken. Actually, I was around the age Laura was when she took these," I mused, as I peered up Ms. Moralist's jauntily spread thighs to her cave of pleasure.

" I remember seeing those photos when we were cleaning up your office!" squealed Lavonne as she ran to get them. She spread them out on the desk. I studied my various exposed body parts, sometimes approvingly, sometimes critically, as most of us do when faced with old nude photos of ourselves. I looked into my eyes and saw a young woman exploring her sexuality, sensuous in some shots, powerful, funny or insecure-looking in others. Then I looked into Laura's eyes and saw a similar range of feelings.

Look into your eyes, Dr. Laura! See who you are. Get off your pedestal of hate! Stop bashing and belittling the kind of woman that you yourself are, or at least, have been.

I'm publishing these photos for you, Dr. Laura, because they show a side of you that I actually like and respect. And just to prove that I'm not exploiting your "youthful indiscretion," I'm also publishing eight old nude photos of me (the ones that Lavonne dug up), all taken when I was about your age, somewhere between 28 and 30, a "pseudo-professional porn queen" like you.

Another reason I'm publishing my own photos is that if I don't, someone else will. What with the exposure of the President, then all those Republican Congresspeople, and now Dr. L., it's dig-up-the-evidence-of-your-adversary's-sexual-past time, isn't it?

This is your chance to repent, Dr. Laura! Accept your sexuality and the sexuality of others. Apologize to us all. Or the Block Curse will continue to haunt you.

And here is your chance to see my old (and new) nude photos.

[Negentropic]

Dr. Laura Schlessinger Quits Radio Show Amidst N-Word Controversy

Quits means the ADL told the Boss at the Radio network either she quits or you fire her ass if you know what's good for you.  That's because no matter what happens they've got to keep their big 'anti-hate-speech' Psy-Op alive until they pass their hate-speech legislation. It's funny how the black caller knew exactly what the parameters of the Psy-Op are and that she could complain and get results on this particular show whereas against someone like Howard Stern who's done a hundred times worse, thousands of times in the course of his shock-jock career, nothing would happen except maybe an FCC fine only after thousands of people complained. Stern even chose a black-sidekick to allow him to do do more racial stuff with her fronting the nod-of-approval for the entire black community. He did this on Radio for 30 years before being booted up to a $20 million a year salary on Satellite radio. What does this show? Stern is a much more important asset to the ADL than someone like Dr. Laura. If not they would have booted Stern's ass into obscurity a long time ago. Stern at the height of his popularity had 20 million listeners. He was able to do enough corrupting down to the lowest-common denominator precisely because he can front as a 'free speech' advocate. What's better getting 20 million brainwashed morons that will also happen to be much more likely to use racial slurs like their hero Howard and play into the hate-speech-law hand or risk having even a small portion of that 20 million people non-lobotomized and thinking for themselves? In Stern's case, they allow quite a bit of free-speech to gain a lot of brainwashing.  In Schlesinger's case it works like the opposite: they'll stifle free speech at the first crossing of the line in order to maintain full momentum and 'political correctness' in another mass brainwashing operation or Psy-op, the one that supported civil rights laws 40 years ago and affirmitive action progrmas later and now supports 'hate crimes legislation."  They're different fronts for different levels and types of media imposed brainwashing within the same general war of demoralization. In this context, I would re-view the Bezmenov video interviews again.

http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12167


Several U.S. cities snapping over baggy pants
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-10-14-Baggy_N.htm

Baggy pants ban "unconstitutional," rules US judge
09-16-2008, 17h59
MIAMI (AFP)

http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=252004

















"NOOO! Niggaz be stealing mah bukkit!"

[Negentropic]

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

The following excerpt is from one of my favorite sociological studies of America, American life and values masterfully extrapolated from first-hand study of one of its most extreme subcultures, Hunter S. Thompson's visionary masterpiece "Hell's Angels" written way back in 1966. Thompson gained the trust of and lived and rode with the Angels for a full year before they beat the crap out of him and sent him to the hospital. But he had what he wanted, this incredible book. This excerpt (chapter 19, page 237) shows how, a very extreme segment of the American population, the most notorious of outlaw biker gangs, and often vilified as racist too for not allowing black members, dealt with the issue in a similar fashion to Chris Rock in his comedy routine 40 years later, "Good Spades vs. Crazy Niggers" :  

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34884768/Hunter-S-Thompson-Hell-s-Angels

"One of the best of the La Honda soirees was held on Labor Day weekend of 1965, the first anniversary of the Monterey rape. By this time the Angels' publicity blitz was in high gear and they were dealing constantly with the news media. Reporters and photographers were hanging around the El Adobe nearly every weekend -- asking questions, taking photos and hoping for action to beef up the next day's headlines. The Oakland police assigned a special four-man detail to keep tabs on the Angels. They would stop by the bar now and then, smiling good-naturedly through a torrent of insults, and hang around just long enough to make sure the outlaws knew they were being watched. The Angels enjoyed these visits; they were much happier talking with cops than they were with reporters or even sympathetic strangers, who were frequenting the El Adobe in ever increasing numbers. Despite the outlaws' growing notoriety, the Oakland police never put the kind of death-rattle heat on them that the other chapters were getting. Even at the peak of the heat, Barger's chapter had a special relationship with the local law. Barger explained it as a potential common front against the long-rumored Negro uprising in East Oakland, which both Negroes and Hell's Angels think of as their own turf. The cops, he said, were counting on the Angels to "keep the niggers in line."

"They're more scared of the niggers than they are of us," Sonny said, "because there's a
lot more of em."

The Angels' relationship with Oakland Negroes is just as ambivalent as it is with the cops. Their color line is strangely gerrymandered, so that individual "good spades" are on one side and the mass of "crazy niggers" are on the other. One of the Nomads (formerly the
Sacramento chapter) shares an apartment with a Negro artist who makes all the Angel parties without any hint of self-consciousness. The outlaws call him a "real good cat."

"He's an artist," Jimmy told me one night at a party in Oakland. "I don't know much about
art, but they say he's good."

Charley is another good spade. He's a wiry little Negro who's been riding with the Angels for so long that some of them are embarrassed to explain why he's not a member. "Hell, I admire the little bastard," said one, "but he'll never get in. He thinks he will, but he won't. . . shit, all it takes it two blackballs, and I could tell you who they'd be by just lookin around the room."

I never asked Charley why he didn't ride with the East Bay Dragons, an all-Negro outlaw club like the Rattlers in San Francisco. The Dragons have the same kind of half-mad élan as the Angels, and a group of them wailing down the highway is every bit as spectacular. They wear multicolored helmets, and their bikes are a flashy mixture of choppers and garbage wagons -- all Harley 74s. The Dragons, like the Angels, are mainly in their twenties and more or less unemployed. Also like the Angels, they have a keen taste for the action, violent or otherwise.*

* The Rattlers are generally older. The club dates back to the days of the Booze Fighters. "The Rattlers had a lot of class in the old days," one of the Oakland Angels lamented. "But all they do now is sit around their bar and play dominoes."

Shortly after I met the Oakland Angels, and long before I knew the Dragons even existed, I was standing in the doorway of the El Adobe on a dull Friday night, when the parking lot suddenly filled up with about twenty big chrome-flashing bikes ridden by the wildest-looking bunch of Negroes I'd ever seen. They rolled in, gunning their engines, and dismounted with such an easy, swaggering confidence that my first impulse was to drop my beer and run. I had been around the Angels long enough to get the drift of their thinking on "niggers". . . and now here they were, a gang of black commandos booming right up to the Hell's Angels command post. I stepped out of the doorway to a spot where I would have a clear sprint to the street when the chain-whipping started.

There were about thirty Angels at the bar that night and most of them hurried outside, still carrying their beers, to see who the visitors were. But nobody looked ready to fight. By the time the Dragons had cut their engines, the Angels were greeting them with friendly jibes about "calling the cops" and "having you bastards locked up for scaring hell out of the citizens."

Barger shook hands with Lewis, the Dragons' president, and asked what was happening. "Where've you guys been hiding?" Sonny said. "If you came around here more often you might make the papers." Lewis laughed and introduced Sonny, Terry and Gut to some of the new Dragon members. Most of the black outlaws seemed to know the Angels by their first names. Some went into the bar while others drifted around the parking lot, shaking hands here and there and admiring the bikes. The talk was mainly of motorcycles, and although it was pointedly friendly, it was also a bit reserved. By this time Sonny had introduced me to Lewis and some of the others. "He's a writer," Barger said with a smile. "God only knows what he's writin, but he's good people." Lewis nodded and shook hands with me. "How you makin it?" he said. "If Sonny says your okay with him, you're okay with us." He said it with such a wide smile that I thought he was going to laugh. Then he clapped me on the shoulder in a quick, friendly sort of way, as if to make sure I understood that he'd pegged me for an arch con man, but that he wasn't going to ruin the joke by letting Sonny in on it.

The Dragons stayed about an hour, then boomed off to wherever they were going. The Angels didn't invite them to any parties later on, and I had a feeling that both groups were relieved that the visit had come off so smoothly. The Angels seemed to forget all about the Dragons just as soon as they rolled out of sight. The El Adobe shuffle resumed once again. . . the familiar beery tedium, the honky-tonk blare of the juke box, bikes coming and going, balls clacking on the pool table, and the raucous, repetitious chatter of people who spend so much time together that they can only kill the boredom by getting out of their heads. Sonny left early, as he usually does, and as he mounted his black Sportster in the parking lot I remembered the Dragons and asked why they seemed on such friendly terms with the Angels. "We're not real close," he replied, "and we never will be as long as I'm president. But they're different from most niggers. They're our kind of people."

I never saw the Dragons at the El Adobe again, but other Negroes who came there got a different reception. One weekend night in late August a group of four came in. They were all in their twenties, wearing sport coats without ties, and one was so big that he had to duck through the doorway. He was almost seven feet tall and weighted between 250 and 300. The place was crowded, but the four Negroes found some room at the bar and the big one struck up an apparently friendly conversation with Don Mohr, the photographer, who had just been made an honorary Angel. The rest of the outlaws ignored the newcomers, but about thirty minutes after their arrival, Mohr and the black Goliath began snarling at each other. The nature of the dispute was never made clear, but Mohr said later that he'd bought the "big nigger" two beers in the course of their conversation. "Then he ordered another one," Mohr explained, "and I told him I'd be fucked if I'd pay for it. That's all it took, man. He was lookin for trouble just by comin in here.

When I told him to buy his own goddamn beer after I paid for the first two rounds he got sarcastic -- so I said let's go outside."

The two were already squared off in the parking lot before the other Angels even realized a fight was in the making, but by the time the first blow landed, the combat area was enclosed in a ring of spectators. Mohr went after his huge opponent without any preliminaries; he leaped forward and swung at the Negro's head -- and that was the end of the fight.

The Negro swung blindly as the others swarmed over him. He was whacked
simultaneously in the stomach, the kidneys and on all sides of his head. One of his friends tried to help him but ran into Tiny's forearm and was knocked unconscious. The other two had enough sense to run. The monster reeled back for a moment, then rushed forward, still swinging, until he was hit from the side and sent sprawling. Three of the outlaws tried to hold him, but he jumped up and bulled into the bar. He didn't look hurt, but he was bleeding from several small cuts, and after being hit so often, from so many different directions, he couldn't get his bearings. He went down again but got up quickly and backed against the juke box. Until then he'd been a moving, lunging target and only two or three of the Angels had managed a solid shot at him. But now he was brought to bay. For about five seconds nothing happened. The Negro looked desperately for an opening to run through, and he was still looking when Terry's off-the-floor blockbuster caught him in the left eye. He fell back on the juke box, smashing the glass cover, and sank to the floor.


For a moment he seemed done, but after a flurry of boots in the ribs he pulled one of his
attackers off balance and got back on his feet. He was still straightening up when Andy, one of the frailest and least talkative of the Angels, caught him in the right eye with a frenzied running punch that would have fractured a normal man's skull. When he went down this time Sonny grabbed his collar and jerked him onto his back. A boot heel crashed into his mouth. He was helpless now, his face covered with blood, but the stomping continued. Finally they dragged him outside and dropped him face down in the parking lot.

The first police car arrived just as the beating ended. Two others rolled up from different directions, then came a paddy wagon, and finally an ambulance. The Angels insisted the huge victim had pulled a knife on them and had to be subdued. The cops looked around with theirflashlights, but the knife was not to be found. The Negro was in no condition to deny anything, although he regained consciousness almost immediately and was able to walk to the ambulance.

This seemed to satisfy the police, at least for the time being. They took a few notes and warned Sonny that the victim might want to press charges when he came out of shock, but I had the impression that they considered the case already closed. . . natural justice had prevailed.

The case never came to court, but it whipped the Angels into a very agitated state of
mind. There was no doubt in their heads that the niggers would try to get even. And next time itwouldn't be just four of them. Never in hell. Next time it would be massive retaliation.

Probably they would strike on a moonless night. . . they would wait until almost closing time, hoping to catch the Angels drunk and helpless, and then they would make their move. The dreary neon calm of East Fourteenth Street would be shattered without warning by the screeching of primitive bone whistles. Wave after wave of sweaty black bodies would move out of the command post -- the Doggie Diner on East Twenty-third -- and move silently through the streets to their positions on the attack perimeter, about four hundred yards from the El Adobe. Then, when the bone whistles sounded, the first wave of niggers would run like the devil across East Fourteenth, ignoring the red light, and fall on the Angels with savage homemade weapons.

Every time I talked to the Angels in the weeks after the Big Nigger incident they warned me that the cork was ready to blow. "We're pretty sure it's gonna be Saturday night," Sonny would tell me. "We got the word from a fink." I assured him that I wanted to be there when the attack came, and I did. Several months earlier I would have laughed the whole thing off as some kind of twisted, adolescent delusion. . . but after spending most of that summer in the drunk-bloody, whore-walloping taverns of East Oakland, I had changed my ideas about reality and the human animal.

One weekend night in late summer I got out of my car in the El Adobe lot. Somebody called my name in a high-pitched whisper and I nodded to the handful of Angels standing near the doorway. I heard the whisper again, but none of the people I could see had said anything. Then I realized somebody was on the roof. I looked up and saw Sonny's head peering over the concrete ledge. "Around back," he hissed. "There's a ladder."

Behind the building, in a jumble of garbage cans, I found a twenty-foot ladder leading up to the roof. I climbed up to find Sonny and Zorro lying in a corner almost invisible in a maze of peeling tar paper. Sonny had an AR-16, the newest U.S. Army rifle, and Zorro had an M-1 carbine. Piled between them on the roof was a stack of ammunition in boxes and clips, a flashlight and a thermos bottle of coffee. They were waiting for the niggers, they said. This was the night.

It wasn't -- but the Angels kept armed guards on the roof of the El Adobe for nearly a
month, until they were sure the niggers were completely intimidated. One afternoon at the height of the tension Barger and five others rode their bikes out to a target range in Alameda. They
carried their rifles strapped over their backs and took a route through the middle of Oakland. The police telephone hummed with reports of a heavily armed Hell's Angel patrol moving south through the center of town. But there was nothing the cops could do. The outlaws had their unloaded guns in plain sight and were observing the speed limit. They felt they needed some target practice. . . and if their appearance had a bad effect on the public, well, that was the public's problem, not theirs.

Most of the Angels knew better than to carry weapons openly, but some of their homes resemble private arsenals -- knives, revolvers, automatic rifles and even a homemade armored car with a machine-gun turret on top. They don't like to talk about their weaponry. . . it's their only insurance policy against that day when the Main Cop decides on a showdown, and the Angels are absolutely certain that day is coming.

No, I wouldn't call them "racists." Not really. Maybe deep down they are. There ain't no Negro Angels, you notice. But the Angels ain't for anybody, and that makes them anti-Negro and just about anything else.
-- San Bernardino County police inspector

In the language of politics and public relations the Angels "peaked" in the fall of 1965. The Labor Day Run to Kesey's was a letdown of sorts, because towns all over the country were braced for the invasion, waiting to be raped and pillaged. The National Guard was called out at such far-flung points as Parker, Arizona, and Claremont, Indiana. Canadian police set up a spe- cial border watch near Vancouver, British Columbia; and in Ketchum, Idaho, the locals mounted a machine gun on the roof of a Main Street drugstore. "We're ready for those punks," said the sheriff. "We'll put half of em in jail and the other half in the graveyard."

The Angels' jaunt to La Honda was a sad anticlimax for the press. The outlaws did a lot of strange, high-speed traveling, but it was not in the realm of the five W's. One of my memories of that weekend is Terry the Tramp's keynote speech delivered to the police on the highway. He got hold of a microphone tied up to some powerful speakers and used the opportunity to unburden his mind. . . addressing the police in a very direct way, speaking of morals and music and madness, and finishing on a high, white note which the San Mateo sheriffs department will not soon forget:

"Remember this," he screamed into the mike. "Just remember that while you're standin out there on that cold road, doin your righteous duty and watchin all us sex fiends and dope addicts in here having a good time. . . just think about that little old wife of yours back home with some dirty old Hell's Angel crawlin up between her thighs!" Then a burst of wild laughter,clearly audible on the road. "What do you think about that, you worthless fuzz? You gettinhungry? We'll bring you some chili if we have any left over. . . but don't hurry home, let your wife enjoy herself."

It was hard to know, in the triumphant chaos of that Labor Day, that the Angels were on the verge of blowing one of the best connections they'd ever had. Busting up country towns was old stuff, and the cops were getting tense about it. The hippie drug scene was a brand-new dimension -- a different gig, as it were -- but as the Vietnam war became more and more a public issue the Angels were put in a bind.

   For several months they'd been drifting toward political involvement, but the picture was hazy and one of the most confusing elements was their geographical proximity to Berkeley, the citadel of West Coast radicalism. Berkeley is right next door to Oakland, with nothing between them but a line on the map and a few street signs, but in many ways they are as different as Manhattan and the Bronx. Berkeley is a college town and, like Manhattan, a magnet for intellectual transients. Oakland is a magnet for people who want hour-wage jobs and cheap housing, who can't afford to live in Berkeley, San Francisco or any of the middle-class Bay Area suburbs.* It is a noisy, ugly, mean-spirited place, with the sort of charm that Chicago had for Sandburg. It is also, a natural environment for hoodlums, brawlers, teen-age gangs and racial tension.

* Oakland's official population is nearly four hundred thousand, but it is the center of a vastly urban sprawl
called the East Bay, with a population of about two million -- more than twice the size of San Francisco.

howard hughes






Clark Gable on his Harley Davidson


Sonny Barger, November 1959 on a 1946 Harley stroker





Buddy Miles, drummer in Hendrix's Band of Gypsies and Electric Flag before that on Harley chopper trike

Old School Political African-American poetry & music, today's stuff is pathetically weak in comparison, even when not highly destructive and soul-polluting:

"Wake Up Brothers" by Doug Hammond
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9m11tPRbd8[/youtube]1lfmv018]

'Mama Debt' by Iceberg Slim
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3RIXh9p6AQ[/youtube]1lfmv018]

Last Poets Blessed are those who struggle
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKMPE7DjKcQ[/youtube]1lfmv018]

Niggers Are Scared Of Revolution! (The Last Poets)
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpo11TxSdVg[/youtube]1lfmv018]

"The Prostitute" by the Watts Prophets
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v83aVYKUL0o[/youtube]1lfmv018]

"Livin' In the City" by The Melton Brothers Band
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyp3zgyYmjc[/youtube]1lfmv018]

"The Days, The Hours" by The Watts Prophets
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4hAZtU8_aM[/youtube]1lfmv018]

Last Poets - Run, Nigga
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc-CymirOeI[/youtube]1lfmv018]

Last Poets BeYonDer Part 1.wmv
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coy0cdOAEPs[/youtube]1lfmv018]

Last Poets BeYonDer Part 2.wmv
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkVQFZAdlP8[/youtube]1lfmv018]

"Child of the Streets" by Sam Dees
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWNVPfoVywA[/youtube]1lfmv018]

"Because They Envy Us" by Wanda Robinson
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6xAeW98Axk[/youtube]1lfmv018]

Che Guevara Memorial video- Gil Scott Heron The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p43YYovonS0[/youtube]1lfmv018]

Gil Scott-Heron: We Beg Your Pardon
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDCfEkopryo[/youtube]1lfmv018]

"Bend Your Head Low" by Geoffrey Stoner
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEvwDkdyRW4[/youtube]1lfmv018]

"Black Maybe" by Gary Bartz Off of "Ntu Troop JuJu Street Songs", 1972 w/Andy Bey
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPMxWP16azE[/youtube]1lfmv018]

Marilyn McCoo Chuck Mangione - Chase the Clouds Away - SOLID GOLD - a beautiful positive message
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AveMsIxaKZM[/youtube]1lfmv018]

Jurassic 5 - "Jayou" - a 1996 throwback to the old school
[youtube:1lfmv018]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nf2qtXsTH84[/youtube]1lfmv018]

Quite a few of these great videos were posted by this dusty-fingered old record collector guy. I subscribed to his you tube channel. He knows his 60s & 70s music, that's for sure:  http://www.youtube.com/user/BeyondBodyAndSoul


By the way, as Jew Watch observed, Dustin Hoffman the actor in that Lenny video previously posted looks an awful lot like uncle Joe Stalin (they think Stalin was a Jew too and use this comparison to try to prove their point):

[maz]

Dr. Laura Schlessinger Quits Radio Show Amidst N-Word Controversy

Quits means the ADL told the Boss at the Radio network either she quits or you fire her ass if you know what's good for you.  That's because no matter what happens they've got to keep their big 'anti-hate-speech' Psy-Op alive until they pass their hate-speech legislation. It's funny how the black caller knew exactly what the parameters of the Psy-Op are and that she could complain and get results on this particular show whereas against someone like Howard Stern who's done a hundred times worse, thousands of times in the course of his shock-jock career, nothing would happen except maybe an FCC fine only after thousands of people complained. Stern even chose a black-sidekick to allow him to do do more racial stuff with her fronting the nod-of-approval for the entire black community. He did this on Radio for 30 years before being booted up to a $20 million a year salary on Satellite radio. What does this show? Stern is a much more important asset to the ADL than someone like Dr. Laura. If not they would have booted Stern's ass into obscurity a long time ago. Stern at the height of his popularity had 20 million listeners. He was able to do enough corrupting down to the lowest-common denominator precisely because he can front as a 'free speech' advocate. What's better getting 20 million brainwashed morons that will also happen to be much more likely to use racial slurs like their hero Howard and play into the hate-speech-law hand or risk having even a small portion of that 20 million people non-lobotomized and thinking for themselves? In Stern's case, they allow quite a bit of free-speech to gain a lot of brainwashing.  In Schlesinger's case it works like the opposite: they'll stifle free speech at the first crossing of the line in order to maintain full momentum and 'political correctness' in another mass brainwashing operation or Psy-op, the one that supported civil rights laws 40 years ago and affirmitive action progrmas later and now supports 'hate crimes legislation."  They're different fronts for different levels and types of media imposed brainwashing within the same general war of demoralization. In this context, I would re-view the Bezmenov video interviews again.

Could be. I agree with the stuff about Howard Stern, but Dr. Laura could have been retiring anyways so she could have taken one for the team.

But aside from that thanx for the laughs on those pics. I've been told thatin prison you wear your pant's like that to let others know that you're available or something like that. Not sure if it's true, btu wouldn't that be funny if this trend is just a big laugh on black kids.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Negentropic!!! What the Hell!  You forgot BRICK! G*ddammitt!  What kind of forgotten Crypto-50's-70's Drug Store paperback Americana culture are you trying to spew here at TIU!  :wtf:

I'm Pissed off! Get it Right... say 10 times... "Idiot Jews wrote the Protocols of the Elders of Zion" ... and then blaze one!  :x

Dazz (1976)


[youtube:3p1vq385]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpr9qvuodVA[/youtube]3p1vq385]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpr9qvuodVA


[youtube:3p1vq385]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kogk_yFMHhM[/youtube]3p1vq385]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kogk_yFM ... re=related

[Negentropic]

CSR, you're into that old original, authentic 1960s and 1970s black funky music that all the rappers have sampled a million times for their silly-assed non-musician beats ? Who woulda thunk?  I don't know why but your posts and list of interests with guns at the very beginning, gave me the impression that  you were an integrated mixture of scientistific dude / country-boy-will-survive, like half classical music for logical analysis during your scientific investigations and half-Alex-Jones type of mixed-rock-&-country-music or maybe Willie Nelson / Waylon Jennings to go along with the fishing-&-hunting and target practice in the woods atmosphere.  :lol:  :lol:  

But aside from that thanx for the laughs on those pics. I've been told that in prison you wear your pant's like that to let others know that you're available or something like that. Not sure if it's true, btu wouldn't that be funny if this trend is just a big laugh on black kids.

Actually, if you go by the statistics of the last 20 years, In prison it's the white boys that have to worry about getting rump-wrangled ten times more than the blacks, loose pants or not, since they're the minority and the Blacks are over 50% of the population there and make it a point to prey on the white boys.

Outside of prison though white boys of all backgrounds seem to think it's the ultimate fashion statement to walk around in your underwear with the pants hanging on your hips. Just in my own personal experience, I've had two white boys work for me buying and packing stuff I sell on e-bay. One was a goth-heavy-metal guitarist / singer from Atlanta Georgia with the full arm tattoos and the ring in his lip and long hair and black clothes and ever-present cowboy boots who also liked country music, jazz and rap and obscure foreign movies, the other dude was a Jewish guy with a goatie and not the best hygiene (you should have seen the mess in this guy's van which he had driven on all over the US) who wore them Mao and Che Guevara type commie shirts and chain-smoked so much he stank up every room he went into like an ashtray. Both of these guys were, despite appearances,  heavy readers and very smart and not at all ordinary or simple in their tastes. And yet both of them were retarded enough to wear their pants loose with no belt for the express purpose of making sure the boxers were at least half visible out of them.    :lol:








[youtube:35ewb8ge]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRX4mlFi06A[/youtube]35ewb8ge]

[Anonymous]

y'all muhfuckas know about Brick!!!!! My Dad fucks wit Brick!!!! They straight out the ATL!!!

Anyway sticking to the thread title. Your resident Nigger/Black Member is back on the opiiates after a just over 2 month break!!! Before the break my tolerance was so high I couldn't feel enough Euphoria anymore!! Now i'm back on it I feel the Euphoria again!!! A nigga fucked wit Hydrocodone once a week!!!! I be back on it!!!! Pray for me!!!!! I didn't want to graduate to a stronger opiate, e.g Oxycodone as it is too addictive!!!!

I'll spell it: E-U-P-H-O-R-I-A

Sorry, just getting it off my chest. Life is great when you feel opiate Euphoria. Sheet.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

CSR, you're into that old original, authentic 1960s and 1970s black funky music that all the rappers have sampled a million times for their silly-assed non-musician beats ? Who woulda thunk?  I don't know why but your posts and list of interests with guns at the very beginning, gave me the impression that  you were an integrated mixture of scientistific dude / country-boy-will-survive, like half classical music for logical analysis during your scientific investigations and half-Alex-Jones type of mixed-rock-&-country-music or maybe Willie Nelson / Waylon Jennings to go along with the fishing-&-hunting and target practice in the woods atmosphere.  :lol:  :lol:  

Well you know Negentropic, you might be surprised by the members here at TIU... you see it is not just guns.... come to think of it, it is kind of like that other, lesser known song by Waylon Jennings.

 Of course, it is not Christopher Marlowe quality but it strikes a chord... of Truth...

-----------------

Theme Song:

Just a good ole Goy,
Never meaning no harm.
Beats all you ever saw, been in trouble with J-Tribe Talmudic law
Since the day he was born.

Straightenin' Jew Lies, n'
Flattenin' the J-Scams.
Someday, the Babylonian Templers might get 'im but the DHS never will.

Makin' his wayyyyyy, the only way he knows how.
Well, that's just a little bit more than Kosher J's will allow.

Just a good ole Goy,
Wouldn't change if he could,
Fightin' the J'system like a true modern day Goyim Hood..[YEE-HAW]  

(Robert E. Lee launches in the air in slo-mo...)
(Picture of Abe Foxman grabbing his Kippa, cursing, ducking and tucking his bottle of Goyim blood in his pants... watching the Robert E Lee...    )

[Negentropic]

Just a good ole Goy,
Never meaning no harm.
Beats all you ever saw, been in trouble with J-Tribe Talmudic law
Since the day he was born.

Straightenin' Jew Lies, n'
Flattenin' the J-Scams.
Someday, the Babylonian Templers might get 'im but the DHS never will.

Makin' his wayyyyyy, the only way he knows how.
Well, that's just a little bit more than Kosher J's will allow.

Just a good ole Goy,
Wouldn't change if he could,
Fightin' the J'system like a true modern day Goyim Hood..[YEE-HAW]

(Robert E. Lee launches in the air in slo-mo...)

:lol:  Ahh man !! That was friggin funny! You hit that one straight out of the park. The parody concept fits right in, just needs some polishing up of lyrics and rhymes . You might wanna fix the words up a little bit so they stay on the meter of each line in the original song and then run a Karaoke of Waylon doing 'good ole boys' and record yourself with a sample of Waylon's voice singing it! If you can't get a sample of Waylon's voice to sing it, get the next best thing, your local neightborhood Elvis imitator.  :lol:  That should be the theme song of TIU. Everytime you go into TIU it should automatically start.  





The original movie the Dukes of Hazzard was based on, also scored by Waylon


James Mitchum is, of course, the son of Robert Mitchum, Elvis's favorite actor who did the original moonrunners movie "Thunder Road" in 1957:





Robert Mitchum, by the way, wasn't just Elvis's idol, but a pretty smart, well-read and intellectual guy despite all surface appearances. In fact, he was one of the few actors in Hollywood who did not believe in the offical story of the holycost, was aware of Revisionist research and not afraid to say it in a mainstream magazine:

http://radioislam.org/sindi/typic.htm

  The "Holocaust"
 is a Typical Zionist Myth
By Dr. Abdullah Mohammad Sindi
(Ph.D. International Relations)
 
1. Introduction
2. Zionist Lies
3. How and Why the "Holocaust" Lies Started
4. Scholars and Historians Deny the "Holocaust"
5. Conclusion
 
 
1. Introduction

The word "holocaust" means an extensive destruction of humans by other humans resulting in the massive loss of life, especially by fire. However, the so-called "holocaust" by Nazi Germany against Jews is actually based on two major lies.

The first lie says that the Nazis killed "6 million" Jews. Because this figure is extremely exaggerated, it is a lie (see below for some reasonable and unbiased estimates).

The second lie says that these "6 million" Jews were rounded up and then "gassed" or "burned" alive. Again, this is a lie because there is no proof whatsoever that any live Jew was ever "gassed" or "burned" in any "gas chambers" or "crematories" in Nazi Germany.

Only those people who had died of dangerous infectious diseases such as typhoid (whether Jews or non-Jews) were burned or cremated in Nazi Germany in order to avoid epidemics. The number of these infected burned dead is much smaller than the "6,000,000" legend. It was a common and legal practice by Nazi Germany and other countries to burn or cremate dead people infected with fatal communicable diseases to avoid infecting the living. No one has ever declared this kind of practice to be illegal.

On the other hand, those Jews who were killed by Nazi conventional means (i.e., not gassed, and not burned) were no more special than the other overwhelming majority of non-Jewish victims who were also similarly killed by the same Nazi conventional means. Since the killing of non-Jews at the hands of the Nazis is not considered by anyone to be a "holocaust", why then should the killing of Jews by Nazi conventional means constitute a "holocaust"?
 
2. Zionist Lies

All Arabs and all Muslims (along with many other people around the world) know very well that the Jewish/Zionist state of Israel is an illegitimate and illegal state established by the power of the gun in 1948 and has been maintained by it ever since.

Committed to a brutal and undemocratic program that could be implemented only by force, Israel has been founded on many well-known myths and lies. Toping the list of these typical myths and lies are the following ten:

1. That Jews are the "Chosen People of God."

2. That Palestine is "The Promised Land from God" for Jews only (despite the fact that Christianity was born there).

3. That the "Promised Land for Jews extends from the Nile to the Euphrates."

4. That Jews have been "homeless" for the last 2,000 years until Israel was created for them in 1948.

5. That the creation of Israel in 1948 has been a "fulfillment of a Biblical prophecy."

6. That Arabs have "hated" Jews for the last 2,000 years (despite the fact that Arabs have always been composed of Muslims, Christians, and Jews).

7. That Palestine was "an empty land" that did not have any Arab inhabitants when the Western the Zionist Jews created Israel on its land in 1948.

8. That Jews were not "allowed" to practice their religion freely in Palestine before Israel was created in 1948.

9. That Israel is a "democratic" and "peaceful" country (even though it has waged many brutal and expansionist wars against the Arabs, has systematically killed and uprooted the native Arab Christians and Muslims from their historical homeland of Palestine, and has stolen their properties and businesses for the last 57 years).

10. That Nazi Germany committed a "holocaust" by "gassing and/or incinerating six million Jews" during World War II.

While there are many Westerners who do not agree with at least one of the above first 9 myths, most people in the West generally accept the last Jewish/Zionist claim about the so-called "holocaust" without any challenge as if it were a "divine truth". This holocaust hoax has been bought and sold by educated and uneducated Westerners alike, whether they are from the far right (such as Christian fundamentalists), or from the so-called "moderates", or even from the far left (such as socialists and communists).

Although the US is believed to be a free country where the first Amendment to the US Constitution has supposedly guaranteed the freedom of speech for anyone who wishes to express logically and rationally his/her views on any subject, the so-called "holocaust" is clearly an exception to this rule. While an attack or criticism by anyone in the US is permitted against the American Government, the American President, Jesus Christ, or even God, a public (as opposed to private) attack or critical comment from anyone in the US on the powerful Jewish lobby or the so-called "holocaust" is not permitted in the land of the "free". Anyone who dares to publicly say or write anything critical about Zionism or Jewish influence in the US is immediately castigated as a "racist' or "anti-Semitic" (that is, anti-Jewish) and would pay a heavy price in damage to his/her reputation and career, as actors Marlon Brando and Vanessa Redgrave found out the hard way. Sometimes the price for speaking out against the Zionists in the land of the "free" is murder, as was the case with Alex Odeh, an Arab-American who was brutally killed in 1985 in his ADC (Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee) office in Southern California.

Although American Jews constitute only a tiny minority of about 2 or 3% of the total US population according to the best estimates, one really wonders if the US is truly a Christian or a Jewish nation, especially when it comes to a public free debate on the so-called "holocaust".
 

3. How and Why the "Holocaust" Lies Started

During the latter parts of World War II in Europe (1939-1945), when it became apparent that Nazi Germany's military defeat was on the horizon, Zionist leaders in and out of the United States feared that their colonialist design to steal the Holy Land of Palestine from the Arabs might lose support. Despite the fact that the anti-Jewish Nazis were on the verge of being annihilated (add to that most European Jews had already been assimilated and were living peacefully in their own respective native Western countries including the US where many German and Eastern European Jews had migrated), Zionist leaders still desperately wanted to continue at all costs with their old Pre-Nazi plan to settle-colonize Arab Palestine.

Obviously something heinous, dreadful, and shocking was needed during and after the concluding months of World War II for two main reasons. The first was to gain the necessary global legitimacy and support for the old Zionist scheme of 1897 (the birth of the World Zionist Organization) and 1917 (the British Balfour Declaration) to settle-colonize Palestine. The second was to rejuvenate Zionism by rallying reluctant Western non-Zionist Jews firmly behind the Zionist cause to establish an "exclusively" Jewish country for the so-called "homeless" Western Jews on this important Arab Holy Land of Palestine. It should be indicated here that the West has been obsessed to steal Palestine from the Arabs since the times of the old bloody Western Crusades (1095-1291).

To acquire world-wide support, compassion, and sympathy for their plan to colonize Arab Palestine, Zionist leaders in and out of the US suddenly began to circulate terribly horrifying stories that the Nazis had "incinerated" or "gassed" "six million" Jews in various "gas chambers", "ovens," and "crematoria" in and out of Germany between the end of 1942 and November 1944 (five months prior to Adolph Hitler's suicide in April 1945). The Zionists also added that the Nazis had even made "fertilizers," "lamp shades," "handbags," "ropes," and "soap" from the skin, fat, and hair of the "exterminated" Jews.

The first person in the world to mention this dreadful information about the so-called "holocaust" and the "extermination of six million Jews" was Zionist Rabbi Israel Goldstein. He mentioned his wild claim on December 13, 1942. [1] Goldstein's unverified claim became much more widely circulated by Zionist leaders, in and out of the USA, and their sympathizers all over the world after the end of World War II.

This "holocaust" claim was actually instrumental in producing the "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181" on November 29, 1947 that gave "legitimacy" and "legality" to the creation of the illegitimate and illegal Western-oriented Zionist state of Israel over half of Palestine against the wishes of its native Arabs. It should be indicated that this "UN" resolution, which the US masterfully engineered by heavily pressuring UN member states, passed by a vote of 33 countries for it, 13 against it, with 10 abstentions.  
 

4. Scholars and Historians Deny the "Holocaust"

No sooner had this new and shocking information about the so-called Nazi "holocaust" become public than many Western scholars and historians both in Europe and the US began to quickly refute it as a well-orchestrated wartime Zionist propaganda campaign. They compared it to other similar propagandas during wars such as those during World War I when the Germans were accused of "eating Belgian babies and delighting to throw them in the air and transfix them on bayonets". In the words of Dr. Arthur R. Butz, an American professor at Northwestern University in Illinois, (more on Dr. Butz below), the: "Zionists, principally the World Jewish Congress, merely presented their nonsense ["holocaust"] to the Allied governments, in particular to the US Government, demanding endorsement of their nonsense."[2]

Although the Zionists and their sympathizers have always labeled anyone who denies the "holocaust" as a "right-wing" or "racist", in fact since the mid 1940s many Western and non-Western scholars and historians, from all walks of life with different ethnic backgrounds and political persuasions (including Jews), have categorically refuted the alleged Nazi "genocide," "the gas chambers," and the unbelievable number of "six million."

However, it should be quickly emphasized here that these scholars and historians like Dr. Butz, some of whom will be mentioned shortly, do not deny the fact that many Jews and non-Jews were indeed persecuted or killed in Nazi Germany as well as in the German-occupied territories during World War II, both inside and outside the Nazi horrible concentration camps. What they deny is this so-called "holocaust". They deny both the number of the "six millions" as well as the manner by which these Jews were killed. These holocaust deniers all agree on the following six fundamental points: [3]

1. That the so-called "holocaust" and the "six million" story originated from the Zionists themselves and not from any government authority or any other independent source.

2. That neither the February 1945 Yalta Conference (the summit of the three leaders of Russia, US, and Britain), nor the Vatican, nor even the International Red Cross, spoke out against any "holocaust" or "the six million" legend, and none of them had any reason to.

3. That none of the three major personal World War II memoirs of either the one written by French leader Charles de Gaulle, or that of the British leader Winston Churchill, or even that of the American leader Dwight D. Eisenhower, mentioned anything about any "holocaust".

4. That the post-World War II Nuremberg war crime trials in Germany, which automatically "accepted" the Zionist claim of the "six million" figure, were nothing more than partial and biased political prosecutions by the victorious powers.

5. That the only so-called "confession" to "burning and gassing live Jews" came from only one person on April 5 1946 - Nazi Auschwitz commandant Colonel Rudolf Franz Hoess (or Hoss) - after he was tortured by six British military police intelligence officers as one of them, sergeant Bernard Clarke, later admitted.

6. That the best estimate of the total number of Jews who died or were killed (not "gassed" or "incinerated") in and out of the German terrible concentration camps lost their lives either from Nazi brutalities, starvation, diseases, war-related causes, or other reasons, ranges from 300,000 to 500,000 (and not 6 millions). It should be indicated here that during World War II about 74 million people died, the overwhelming majority of whom were non-Jews, including the atomically bombed/incinerated civilians of the entire two Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The late French geographer Paul Rassinier (nicknamed "the father of holocaust revisionism"), who was elected in 1945 as a Socialist to the French National Assembly, published in 1948 a book titled: Le Passage de la Ligne ("Crossing the Line") in which he recounted his horrible experiences as an interned left-wing political prisoner in the German concentration camps of Buchenwald and Dora between 1943 and 1945. In this book and in many others that followed it, such as The Holocaust Story and the Lies of Ulysses, Rassinier strongly refuted the "holocaust," the "gas chambers," and the "six million" figure.

While completely rejecting the claim of the "extermination" of Jews by the Nazis, Rassinier generously estimated that perhaps a million Jews might have perished [4] (a figure considered too high by many other holocaust refuters) due to many causes between 1933 and 1945 as a result of direct and indirect various brutal Nazi policies such as the turmoil of Jewish deportations, harsh labor conditions, internment camps, malnutrition, diseases, epidemics, and more importantly World War II itself.

Another French, Dr. Robert Faurisson, a former Professor at the Universite de Lyon, also rejected the so-called Nazi "holocaust"; challenged anyone to draw or show a "Nazi gas chamber"; described the famous Diary of Anne Frank as a hoax; and called the Washington, DC Holocaust Memorial Museum "an historical fiasco".

Incidentally, while there is a Holocaust Memorial Museum in the US for the presumed "six million gassed" Jews by Nazi Germany, there are nowhere in the US any holocaust memorial museums, reparations, or even words of apology for either Native Americans or Black Americans who were slaughtered like animals by the tens of millions at the hands of Euro-Americans during the largest real holocaust the world has ever seen. In the words of the American professor Ward Churchill, "All told, it is probable that more than one hundred million native people were 'eliminated' in the course of Europe's ongoing 'civilization' of the Western Hemisphere". [5] Another American professor, David E. Stannard, writes that between 40-60 million black Africans lost their lives in the brutalities of the Euro-Americans slavery system. [6]

In his well researched and documented book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, Dr. Arthur R. Butz explained that during World War II even US State Department officials, such as J. Breckenridge Long and associates, "... considered all the talk about 'exterminations' to be just wartime propaganda invention, in the same spirit as the stories invented during World War I." [7] In Dr. Butz's words, "The 'gas chambers' were wartime propaganda fantasies completely comparable to the garbage that was shoveled out by Lord Bryce and associates in World War I." [8]

Dr. Butz also indicated that the total number of inmates in the entire German concentration camp system, Jews and non-Jews (since there were no camps specifically for Jews alone), was about 224,000 in 1943 and 524,000 in 1944. [9] Moreover, Dr; Butz pointed out that Heinrich Himmler, the second most powerful man in Nazi Germany (who supposedly "committed suicide" by "poisoning himself" on May 23, 1945, while in British captivity), had explained a few weeks before the end of World War II in an interview with a representative of the World Jewish Congress that:

"In order to put a stop to the [typhus] epidemics, we were forced to burn the bodies of incalculable numbers of [dead] people who had been destroyed by disease. We were therefore forced to build crematoria, and on this account they are knotting a noose for us." [10]

Finally, Dr. Butz proved that there was no direct Nazi tangible documentary evidence of any kind for an "extermination" program. He indicated that even Dr. Aryeh Leon Kubovy of the Israeli Center for Jewish Documentation in Tel-Aviv admitted in 1960 that "there exists no document signed by Hitler, Himmler or Heydrich speaking of exterminating the Jews and ... the word 'extermination' does not appear in the letter from Goering to Heydrich concerning the final solution of the Jewish question." [11]

Also, in her 1968 book Le systeme concentrationnaire nazi, French Jewish author Olga Wurmser-Migot writes:

"Just as there exists no ... order of extermination by gas at Auschwitz, there exists no order to stop in November 1944. Neither at the Nuremberg trial, nor during the course of marginal trials nor at the Hess trial in Cracow, nor of Eichman in Israel, nor at the trial of the camp commanders nor at the Frankfurt November 1945 - August 1946 trial of secondary Auschwitz figures, was the famous order signed by Himmler on 22 November 1944 on the end of the extermination of Jews by gas ever found, the order putting an end to the Final Solution." [12]

Moreover, in his book The Six Million Swindle: Blackmailing the German People for Hard Marks with Fabricated Corpses, Dr. Austin J. App, the late American Professor of English literature at the University of Scranton and LaSalle College, explained the following four vital points: [13]

1.      That Hitler's so-called "Final Solution" to the Jewish problem was not "annihilation" but rather deportation or expulsion from Germany, which was approved with the open cooperation and encouragement of the Zionists themselves who wanted German Jews to join other Jews from around the world to leave their own native countries in order to settle-colonize Palestine (a Zionist plan since 1897 and in accordance with the 1917 British Balfour Declaration).

2.      That absolutely no live person (Jew or non-Jew) was ever "gassed" or "burned" in any German concentration camp, including Auschwitz (allegedly the main "extermination" center).

3.      That the Jews who lost their lives while in Nazi hands either died of epidemics and/or killed because they were subversives, spies, saboteurs, criminals, or otherwise victims of unfortunate but internationally legal reprisals.

4.      That the Zionists and their American sympathizers, in and out of the American media and motion picture industry, who constantly use the figure of "six million" have failed to offer even a shred of evidence to prove their charge.

In addition, other Western writers have confuted holocaust story claims. Among them are the following two Americans: World War II Colonel John Beaty of the US Military Intelligence Service of the War Department who ridiculed the "six million" legend in his book Iron Curtain Over America, and Dr. David Leslie Hoggan, a former Professor at the University of California at Berkeley. Also, among British historians who have denied the "holocaust" are the following two: Best-selling author David Irving, and Richard E. Harwood who wrote a book in 1974 titled: Did Six Million Really Die?The Truth at Last [14]. At least three German scholars refuted the "holocaust." These include Dr. Wilhelm Staeglich who wrote Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence, Emil Aretz who wrote Hexen-Einmal-Eins einer Luege ("The Witches' Multiplication Table is a Lie"), and Thies Christophersen who wrote Die Auschwitz Luege ("The Auschwitz Lie").

Among the Japanese holocaust deniers are the following two: Dr. Masanori Nishioka who wrote an illustrated ten-page feature article titled: "The Greatest Taboo of Postwar History: There Were No Nazi Gas Chambers" in the Japanese magazine Marco Polo (February, 1995), and best-selling Japanese writer Masami Uno who described the "holocaust" and The Diary of Anne Frank as lies.

Other prominent holocaust deniers include the following two Canadians, publisher Ernst Zundel, and geologist and aerial photography expert John Ball; Swiss right-wing educator Jurgen Graf; Italian document expert Carlo Mattogno [15]; and Roger Garaudy, a leftist French writer and former member of the French Communist Party whose book, Les mythes fondateurs de la politique israelienne ("The Founding Myths of the Israeli Policy") was published in 1995 in Paris by the leftist writer and publisher Pierre Guillaume. [16]

Beside the already-mentioned Jewish author Olga Wurmser-Migot, there are some other Western Jews who have also categorically denied that the Nazi government ever carried out or even contemplated the "gassing" of Jews. These include Swedish publisher Ditleib Felderer of the Jewish Information Bulletin, American David Cole, and German scholar Joseph Ginsburg. [17]


In fact, people who dispute the "holocaust" are found even in Hollywood itself where Jews established all of the major film studios such as Columbia, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Paramount, Twentieth-Century Fox, Universal, and Warner Brothers. [18] For example, in a 1983 interview with Esquire magazine, the late prominent American actor, Robert Mitchum, scoffed at the so-called "holocaust". When asked about the "slaughter of six million Jews" by the Nazis, Mitchum answered: "So the Jews say, ... People dispute that." [19]  
 

5. Conclusion
There is no doubt whatsoever that it was from this so-called "holocaust" (more than anything else) that Zionism has gained its wide popular acceptance and sympathy throughout the west. This in turn led to the brutal creation of the alien State of Israel over the land of Arab Palestine in 1948 at the extremely tragic expense of its innocent Muslim and Christian natives.

In conclusion, however, whether the Nazis killed one single Jew or 6 million Jews (by whatever method or means), the Germans - and certainly not the Palestinian Arabs - should have paid the price for this so-called "holocaust". Rationally speaking, any part of Germany (and not Palestine) should have been the site for the creation of this brutal, illegitimate, and illegal Jewish/Zionist State of Israel, which has been causing much death and misery to the Arabs.


Notes:
1. Arthur R. Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry (Newport Beach, California: Institute for Historical Review, 1993), p. 80.
2. Ibid., p. 87.
3. See "66 Questions and Answers on the Holocaust," (Newport Beach, California: Institute of Historical Review, 1995).
4. Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, p. 17.
5. Ward Churchill, Indians are Us? Culture and Genocide in Native North America (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1994), p. 30.
6. David E. Stannard, American Holocaust: The Conquest of the New World (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 151.
7. Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, p. 63.
8. Ibid. p. 240.
9. Ibid. p. 36.
10. Quoted in ibid., p. 240.
11. Quoted in ibid., p. 19.
12. Quoted in Roger Garaudy, The Founding Myths of the Israeli Policy (USAR Publishing Group: IPP Printers & Publishers, 1997), pp. 48-49.
13. See Austin J. App, The Six Million Swindle: Blackmailing the German People for Hard Marks With Fabricated Corpses (Takoma Park, Maryland: Boniface Press, 1973).
14. Richard E. Harwood, Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth at Last (Brighton, Sussex England: Historical Review Press, 1974).
15. For more details on the mentioned authors and their positions, which are beyond the scope of this article, see the deliberations of the Twelfth International Revisionist Conference on the "Holocaust" held on September 3-5, 1994 in Irvine, California, organized by The Institute for Historical Review, Newport Beach, California.
16. Garaudy, The Founding Myths.
17. Butz The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, p. 11-12.
18. See Jewish author Neal Gabler, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood (New York: Double Day [and Crown], 1988).
19. Barry Rehfeld, "Robert Mitchum Gives a Ran Interview," Esquire, February 1983, p. 56.


_____________________________________________

Dr. Abdullah Mohammad Sindi is a Saudi-American Professor of International Relations and Political Science. He studied at several universities in France, Belgium, and the USA. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Southern California. Dr. Sindi has taught at various universities and colleges both in Saudi Arabia and the US such as King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, the University of California at Irvine, California State University at Pomona, Cerritos College, and Fullerton College. He also worked at the United Nations in New York for two years. Dr. Sindi has several publications both in Arabic and English. His book, The Arabs and the West: The Contributions and the Inflictions, is sold on Amazon.com.