How Jewish Neo-Cons Duped the Goyim to Die for Israel

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

This BBC documentary is pretty great. It interviews and follows around all the   neo-cons behind the Iraq war. Perle, Feith, Wolfowitz, Wurmser, Frum, Ledeen and especially Wurmser's devilish wife Meyrav Wursmer (she is one sick devil). These Jews are the propagandists in charge of the "clash of civilizations" Zionist project.

[youtube:6slp6w03]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ej0ZViqEyps[/youtube]6slp6w03]
[youtube:6slp6w03]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQkBVa7Z19s[/youtube]6slp6w03]
[youtube:6slp6w03]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqlfpJMlONI[/youtube]6slp6w03]
[youtube:6slp6w03]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArSy1bDJnac[/youtube]6slp6w03]
[youtube:6slp6w03]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq7p42wkFBs[/youtube]6slp6w03]

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Meyrav Wurmser is the Zionist Jewess fanatic neck deep in this   cabal behind the middle east wars. She was part of the IASPS thinktank that gave us the "A Clean Break" shyt, and the MEMRI institute which is a Mossad propaganda outlet to demonize the Muslim world. Of course all of these   war-criers from Israeli thinktanks crossed over to American soil with the AEI, PNAC, JINSA and other neo-con (i.e.Zionist) front groups. She is making quite a killing off of her 'dupe the stupid goys to fight for israel' gig.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyrav_Wurmser

Meyrav Wurmser is an Israeli-born, American scholar of the Arab world. She is married to Swiss-American David Wurmser, former Middle East Adviser to US Vice President Dick Cheney. She is also a Senior Fellow at the US think tank, the Hudson Institute.[1]
Wurmser wrote her Ph.D. thesis on Revisionist Zionism behind the Herut and Likud parties, and received her doctorate in political science at George Washington University. She went on to teach political science at Johns Hopkins University and the US Naval Academy.
In 1996, Wurmser participated in a study that led to the report, A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, a paper prepared for Likud party leader and then incoming Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and suggested a new approach to solving Israel's security problems in the Middle East with an emphasis on "Western values" and the abandonment of traditional "land for peace" negotiations with the Palestinians.[2] Other study participants included Richard Perle, David Wurmser, and Douglas Feith.
From 1998 to 2001, Wurmser was a co-founding member and Executive Director Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) together with Yigal Carmon.
In 2008, Wurmser was listed as a member of the board of advisors of the Endowment for Middle East Truth, a group which was involved in the distribution of over 20 million DVDs of the film Obsession in swing states prior to the 2008 US Presidential election.[3]

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Here is a good list of   neo-cons. It's the new Bolshevik party. Chertoff is the new Lenin, Wolfowitz is the new Kaganovich, Kristol is the new Trotsky, Perle is the new Ehrenburg.

http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/FromOt ... aq-war.htm

A List of prominent Jewish Neocons and their role in getting the U.S. into Iraq and Homeland Security
***Everything shown below has been taken word for word from the respective website cited (primarily Wikipedia).
 
Richard Perle
 
"American political advisor and lobbyist who worked for the Reagan administration as an assistant Secretary of Defense and worked on the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee from 1987 to 2004. He was Chairman of the Board from 2001 to 2003 under the Bush Administration."
 
"He is a member of several conservative think-tanks, such as Project for the New American Century (PNAC), the Hudson Institute, and (as a resident fellow) the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. He is also a Patron of the Henry Jackson Society. "
 
"Perle has written extensively on a number of issues; his cited research interests including defense, national security, and the Middle East. Perle had long been an advocate of regime change in Iraq. He also linked Saddam to Osama Bin Laden just a few days after 9/11"
 
"Perle chaired a study group that included Douglas Feith and David Wurmser that produced a strategy paper for the incoming Likud Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm""
 
"In a New York Times article Perle was criticized for recommending that the Army purchase an armaments system from an Israeli company that a year earlier had paid him $50,000 in consulting fees."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Perle
 
"In 1996, Perle participated in a study group that produced a report for the incoming Likud-led government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel that urged the country to break off then-ongoing peace initiatives and suggested strategies for reshaping the Middle East. Among the group's arguments was the idea that "removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq [was] an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right."
 
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1315
 

Paul Wolfowitz
 "As U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense during the Presidency of George W. Bush, he was "a major architect of President Bush's Iraq policy and, within the Administration, its most passionate and compelling advocate" (Boyer 1)"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wolfowitz
 
Douglas Feith
 
 "Douglas Feith is a former Pentagon official closely associated with the neoconservative political faction who has been investigated for allegedly distorting prewar intelligence on Iraq. Feith served as the deputy undersecretary of defense for policy, the number three position at the Pentagon, from July 2001 to August 2005."
 
"Feith has been questioned by the FBI in relation to the passing by one of his employees of confidential Pentagon documents to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which in turn passed them to the Israeli Embassy. The Senate Intelligence Committee is also investigating Feith."
 
"There seems little doubt that he operated in the Pentagon in such a way as to produce false and misleading 'intelligence,' that he created an entirely false impression of Iraqi weapons capabilities and ties to al-Qaida, and that he is among the chief facilitators of the U.S. war in Iraq. Feith is clearly resigning ahead of the possible breaking of major scandals concerning his tenure at the Department of Defense, which is among the more disgraceful cases of the misleading of the American people in American history."
 
"Although Feith was not formally charged in connection to his work at the Pentagon, his work has been repeatedly investigated, and official reports have linked him to efforts to push faulty evidence to justify the war. One investigation, by the Department of Defense's inspector general (IG), was set up to assess whether the Office of Special Plans (OSP), a specialized outfit set up by Feith within the Pentagon to scrutinize intelligence on Iraq, deliberately skewed information about the regime of Saddam Hussein (New York Times, May 25, 2006)."
 
"Feith also served on the board of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), a think tank that promotes a military and strategic alliance between the United States and Israel. [8]"
 
"Feith favors US support for Israel and has promoted US-Israeli cooperation. He also favors stronger US-Turkish cooperation, and increased military ties between Turkey and Israel. Both Feith and his father have been honored by the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), a conservative organization that often makes common cause on foreign policy issues with conservative Christian organizations."
 
"His father, Dalck, was a member of the Betar, a Revisionist Zionist youth organization"
 
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1146
 
"The Betar Movement (בית"ר, also spelled Beitar) is a Revisionist Zionist youth movement founded in 1923 in Riga, Latvia, by Ze'ev Jabotinsky. Betar members played important roles in the fight against the British during the Mandate, and in the creation of Israel. It has been traditionally linked to the original Herut and then Likud Israeli political parties."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betar
 
Michael Ledeen
 
 "Ledeen was a founding member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs and he served on the JINSA Board of Advisors. In 2003, the Washington Post alleged that he was consulted by Karl Rove, George W. Bush's closest advisor, as his main international affairs adviser."
 
"Michael Ledeen had been accused of being involved in the forgery which claimed that Saddam Hussein had bought yellowcake in Niger."
 
"Writing in The Nation, a left-wing magazine, Jack Huberman, who describes Ledeen as "the most influential and unabashed warmonger of our time", attributes these quotes to Ledeen:[19]
 
* "the level of casualties (in Iraq) is secondary"
* "we are a warlike people (Americans)...we love war"
* "Change - above all violent change - is the essence of human history"
* "the only way to achieve peace is through total war"
* "The purpose of total war is to permanently force your will onto another people"
* "Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ledeen
 
Scooter Libby

 "an American former corporate lawyer, policy advisor, and novelist who served as Assistant to the President of the United States, George W. Bush, Chief of Staff to the Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney, and Assistant to the Vice President for National Security Affairs from 2001 to 2005."
 
"Libby was active in the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee of the Pentagon when it was chaired by Richard Perle during the early years of the George W. Bush administration (2001-2003).[44]"
 
"British Secretary of State for Justice Jack Straw said of Libby: "It's a toss-up whether [he] is working for the Israelis or the Americans on any given day."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scooter_Libby

Charles Krauthammer
 
 "Neoconservative columnist and commentator. Krauthammer appears regularly as a guest commentator on Fox News. His print work appears in the Washington Post, Time magazine and The Weekly Standard."
 
"Krauthammer asserted that Saddam Hussein's possession of weapons of mass destruction was certain"
 
"Krauthammer guaranteed that the weapons would eventually be discovered"
 
"Krauthammer has been a defender of the Likud party in Israel"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer


Stephen Bryen
 
 "Bryen is also closely connected to various high-profile neoconservatives like Richard Perle, under whom Bryen served when Perle was President Ronald Reagan's assistant secretary of defense, and has supported the work of a number of hardline pro-Israel groups like the Center for Security Policy (CSP) and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA)."
 
"In the mid-1970s, Bryen and a group of other mainly neoconservative figures, including Michael Ledeen, helped establish JINSA as an important Washington-based think tank specializing in fostering close ties between the U.S. and Israeli militaries"
 
"Bryen had a role in choosing not only what U.S. weaponry Israel would be allowed to purchase with those funds, but also what sensitive U.S. military technology would be made available to Israel for use in its own burgeoning arms industry."
 
"Some observers have accused Bryen of using his insider connections in Washington to the benefit of Israel."
 
"In a January 2002 article for National Review Online, Bryen pushed the erroneous thesis that Iraq had maintained a well-developed biological weapons program since the first Gulf War in 1991, making it the "leading threat" to "global survival.""
 
"Even prior to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Bryen was part of a core group of foreign policy hardliners and neoconservatives who pushed for overthrowing Saddam Hussein"
 
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1063
 
David Frum
 
"David J. Frum (born 1960) is a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush"
 
"Frum is widely cited as having authored the phrase "axis of evil," "
 
"Frum's latest book, An End to Evil, was co-written with Richard Perle. It provided a defense of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and advocated regime change in Iran and Syria"
 
"Frum writes a weekly column for Canada's National Post newspaper and is a commentator for American Public Radio's "Marketplace." His writings appear frequently in the New York Times, Italy's Il Foglio, and the Daily Telegraph. He also writes a blog, David Frum's Diary at the National Review Online Web site."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Frum
 
Robert Kagan
 
 "American neoconservative scholar and political commentator."
 
"Kagan worked at the State Department Bureau of Inter-American Affairs (1985-1988) and was a speechwriter for Secretary of State George P. Shultz (1984-1985). Prior to that, he was foreign policy advisor to New York Representative and future Republican vice presidential candidate Jack Kemp"
 
"Kagan, who has written for The New Republic, Policy Review, the Washington Post (monthly), and the Weekly Standard, now lives in Brussels, Belgium, with his family."
 
"He is a co-founder of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC)"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kagan
 
David Wurmser
 
 "David Wurmser is a Swiss-American dual citizen and the Middle East Adviser to US Vice President Dick Cheney. Wurmser, a neoconservative, previously served as special assistant to John R. Bolton at the State Department and was a former research fellow on the Middle East at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI)."
 
"In 2000, Wurmser helped draft a document entitled "Ending Syria's Occupation of Lebanon: the US Role?", which called for a confrontation with the regime in Damascus. The document said that Syria was developing "weapons of mass destruction".[2]"
 
"After the September 11, 2001 attacks, Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith appointed Wurmser and veteran defense analyst Michael Maloof as a secret two-man Pentagon intelligence unit. One of their products, days after the attacks, was a memo that suggested "hitting targets outside the Middle East in the initial offensive" or a "non-Al Qaeda target like Iraq." "
 
"On September 4, 2004, the Washington Post reported that FBI counterintelligence investigators had questioned Wurmser, along with Feith, Harold Rhode, and Paul Wolfowitz about the passing of classified information to Ahmad Chalabi and/or the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. [4]"
 
Wurmser's wife, Dr. Meyrav Wurmser, co-founded the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Wurmser
 
Dov Zakheim
 
"During the 2000 U.S. Presidential election campaign, Zakheim served as a foreign policy advisor to George W. Bush "
 
"appointed to be Undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller from 2001 to 2004 under the George W. Bush administration, and served in this capacity until April 2004. During his term as Comptroller, he was tasked to help track down the Pentagon's 2.6 trillion dollars ($2,600,000,000,000) worth of unaccounted transactions"
 
"As an Orthodox Jew, he gained notoriety for his involvement in ending the Israeli fighter program, the IAI Lavi. He argued that Israeli and U.S. interests would be best served by having Israel purchase F-16 fighters, rather than investing in an entirely new aircraft."
 
"He is currently a Vice President of Booz Allen Hamilton."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dov_Zakheim
 
"Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., referred to as Booz Allen is one of the oldest strategy consulting firms in the world.[1]"
"the firm generated annual total sales of over $4 billion in FY2007.[8]"
 
"In 2006 at the request of the Article 29 Working Group, an advisory group to the European Commission (EC), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Privacy International (PI) investigated the U.S. government's SWIFT surveillance program and Booz Allen's role therein. The ACLU and PI filed a memo at the end of their investigation which called into question the ethics and legality of a government contractor (in this case Booz Allen) acting as auditors of a government program, when that contractor is heavily involved with those same agencies on other contracts. The basic statement was that a conflict of interest may exist. Beyond that, the implication was also made that Booz Allen may be complicit in a program (electronic surveillance of SWIFT) that may be deemed illegal by the EC."
 
"A June 28, 2007 Washington Post article [13] related how a U.S. Department of Homeland Security contract with Booz Allen increased from $2 million to more than $70 million through two no-bid contracts, one occurring after the DHS's legal office had advised DHS not to continue the contract until after a review."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booz_Allen_Hamilton
 

Henry Kissenger
 
"In 2002, President George W. Bush appointed Kissinger to chair a committee to investigate the events of the September 11 attacks. "
 
"In 2006, it was reported in the book State of Denial by Bob Woodward that Kissinger was meeting regularly with President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney to offer advice on the War in Iraq.[38] Kissinger confirmed in recorded interviews with Woodward"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_kissinger
 

Norman Podhoretz
 
 "He asserts that the War on Terror is a war against Islamofascism, and constitutes World War IV (World War III having been the Cold War), and advocates the bombing of Iran to pre-empt their acquisition of nuclear weapons."
 
"Project for the New American Century, PNAC, original signer"
 
""Podhoretz is the father of John Podhoretz, a columnist for the Rupert Murdoch-owned New York Post, who also acts as a ubiquitous booster of the hawks"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Podhoretz
 
 
John Podhoretz
 
 "Podhoretz has been one of the most steadfast supporters of U.S. president George W. Bush, and even wrote a book extolling Bush as "the first great leader of the 21st century"."
 
"Podhoretz is emphatic in his defense of Israel"
 
"However, Podhoretz was critical of the tactics used by Israel's leadership in the recent Lebanon conflict, and argued that the Olmert government should have been more forceful in its efforts to weaken Hezbollah as a political and military force."
 
"Podhoretz has a regular column at the New York Post, has been a political commentator on Fox News, and regularly appeared on CNN's Reliable Sources. He has also worked at Time, the Washington Times, Insight, and U.S. News & World Report. Podhoretz is a contributor to The Corner, a group blog run by National Review."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Podhoretz
 

Elliot Abrams
 
 "American lawyer who has served in foreign policy positions for two Republican U.S. Presidents, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush."
 
"During Bush's first term in office, he was appointed the post of Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director on the National Security Council for Near East and North African Affairs. At the start of Bush's second term, Abrams was promoted to be his Deputy National Security Advisor for Global Democracy Strategy, responsible for advancing Bush's strategy of advancing democracy abroad. Although Abrams is considered a leading neoconservative"
 
"He was one of the signatories of the 26 January 1998 PNAC letter sent to President Bill Clinton which called for regime-change in Iraq.[17]"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliott_Abrams
 

Frederick Kagan
 
"Frederick Kagan and his father Donald Kagan, who is a professor at Yale and a fellow at the Hudson Institute, together authored While America Sleeps: Self-Delusion, Military Weakness, and the Threat to Peace Today (2000). The book argued in favor of massive military spending and warned of future threats, including from a potential revival of Iraq's WMD program.[1] Frederick along with his brother Robert Kagan, who is a member of the Aspen Strategy Group, and their father Donald are all signatories to the neoconservative Project for the New American Century manifesto titled Rebuilding America's Defenses (2000)"
 
"Kagan was said to have won-over the ear of President George W. Bush,[3] strongly influencing his subsequent "surge" plan for changing the course of the Iraq War"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Kagan
 

Donald Kagan
============================================================================================
 
"became one of the original signers to the 1997 Statement of Principles by the neoconservative "think tank," Project for the New American Century"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Kagan
 
Alan Dershowtiz
 
He is ""an American political figure and criminal law professor at Harvard Law School"
 
"Dershowitz comments regularly on issues related to Judaism, Israel, civil liberties, the war on terror, and the First Amendment, and appears frequently in the mainstream media as a guest commentator.""
 
"Dershowitz published an essay in the San Francisco Chronicle entitled "Want to Torture? Get a Warrant," in which he advocates the issuance of warrants permitting the torture of terrorism suspects if there were an "absolute need to obtain immediate information in order to save lives"
 
"James Bamford, in his column for The Washington Post of September 8, 2002, reviews Dershowitz's "idea of torture" and describes "

• ne form of torture recommended by Dershowitz—'the sterilized needle being shoved under the fingernails'" as "chillingly Nazi-like.""

"In his book Beyond Chutzpah, Norman Finkelstein" [who is Jewish] "comments: "It is hard to make out any difference between the policy Dershowitz advocates and the Nazi destruction of Lidice, for which he expresses abhorrence-except that Jews, not Germans, would be implementing it."[33]"
 
"His parents, Harry and Claire, were both devout Orthodox Jews"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Dershowitz
 

Daniel Pipes
 
 "American historian and counter-terrorism analyst who specializes in the Middle East."
 
"regular columnist for the New York Sun and The Jerusalem Post. He contributes regularly to David Horowitz's online publication FrontPage Magazine, and he has had his work published by many newspapers across North America, including the Washington Post, New York Times, and Wall Street Journal.[citation needed] He is frequently invited to discuss the Middle East on American network television, as well as by universities and think tanks, has appeared on the BBC and Al Jazeera"
 
"Pipes and the organization were accused of attacking academic freedom in 2002 by publishing a list of academics critical of Israel and U.S. foreign policy"
 
"Pipes has served in various capacities at the Departments of State and Defense, while his father served on the National Security Council, and he has testified to the United States Congress"
"Pipes is an outspoken Zionist."
 
"In 1987, Pipes encouraged the United States to provide Saddam Hussein with upgraded weapons and intelligence,[30] ostensibly to counterbalance Iran's successes in the Iran-Iraq War"
 
"Pipes was a strong backer of the Iraq War, saying that Saddam Hussein posed an "imminent threat" to the United States.[2] In a New York Post article published April 8, 2003, Pipes expressed his opposition to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's concerned prediction that "[the] war [in Iraq] will have horrible consequences...Terrorism will be aggravated...Terrorist organizations will be united...Everything will be insecure." Though this concern was echoed by various other politicians and academics cited by Pipes in his article,[18] Pipes argued that "the precise opposite is more likely to happen: The war in Iraq will lead to a reduction in terrorism.""
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Pipes
 
 
Eliot Cohen
 
 "Cohen is the Director of the Strategic Studies department at SAIS and has specialized in strategic studies, the Middle East, Persian Gulf, Iraq, arms control, and NATO. He is a member of the Project for the New American Century and was called "the most influential neoconservative in academe" by energy economist Ahmad Faruqui.[1] He is currently serving as Counselor to the U.S. State Department."
 
"Cohen was one of the first neoconservatives to publicly advocate war against Iran and Iraq"
Quote by Cohen: "We know that he [Saddam Hussain] supports terror. There's very solid evidence that the Iraqis were behind an attempt to assassinate President Bush's father. And we—by the way, we do know that there is a connection with the 9/11 terrorists."
 
"As a member of the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee Cohen had also been engaged in meetings involving US President George Bush. During these meetings Cohen provided advice on strategy in the Iraq conflict"
 
"On 2 March 2007 it was reported by the Washington Post that Cohen was to be appointed as Condoleezza Rice's "counselor" at the United States Department of State."
 
"Regarding the "academic paper titled The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. The paper criticizes the Israel lobby for influencing U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East away from U.S. interests and towards Israel's interests. Eliot Cohen, who is Jewish, wrote in a prominent op-ed piece in The Washington Post that the academic working paper bears all the traditional hallmarks of anti-Semitism"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliot_Cohen
 

Bill Kristol
 
 "He is the son of Irving Kristol, one of the founders of the neoconservative movement"
 
"Kristol was a strong advocate of the Iraq war"
 
"Most recently he has been a vocal supporter of the Israeli attack on Lebanon, stating that the war is "our war too," referring to the United States. He continues to back the Iraq war, and favors a war with Iran"
 
"Kristol caused controversy by praising President George W. Bush's second inaugural address without disclosing his role as a consultant to the writing of the speech."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Kristol
 
Irving Kristol
 
"considered the founder of American neoconservatism"
 
"Kristol is the founder of the politics and culture journal The Public Interest and the foreign affairs journal The National Interest."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Kristol
 
Max Boot
 
 "He has been a prominent advocate for neoconservative foreign policy, once describing his own position as support for the use of "American might to promote American ideals" throughout the world.[1]"
 
"He is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, a contributing editor to The Weekly Standard, a weekly columnist for the Los Angeles Times and a regular contributor to other publications including the Financial Times and The New York Times. "
 
"He is also a consultant to the U.S. military and a regular lecturer at U.S. military institutions such as the Army War College and the Command and General Staff College. He has previously worked for The Wall Street Journal and The Christian Science Monitor"
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Boot
 

James Schlesinger
 
"James Rodney Schlesinger (born February 15, 1929) was United States Secretary of Defense from 1973 to 1975 under presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. He became America's first Secretary of Energy under Jimmy Carter."
 
"Schlesinger was born in New York City to Rae, a Russian Jewish immigrant, and Julius Schlesinger, an Austrian Jew."
 
"On February 2, 1973 he became Director of Central Intelligence, after Richard Helms"
 
"Thereafter he resumed his writing and speaking career and was employed as a senior adviser to Lehman Brothers, Kuhn Loeb Inc., of New York City. On June 11, 2002 he was appointed by U.S. President George W. Bush to the Homeland Security Advisory Council. He also serves as a consultant to the United States Department of Defense, and is a member of the Defense Policy Board. On January 5, 2006, he participated in a meeting at the White House of former Secretaries of Defense and State to discuss United States foreign policy with Bush administration officials. On January 31, 2006 he was appointed by the Secretary of State to be a member of the Arms Control and Nonproliferation Advisory Board. On May 2, 2006, he was named to be a co-chairman of a Defense Science Board study on DOD Energy Strategy."
 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Schlesinger
 
Marc Grossman
 
"Marc Grossman was the United States Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs
 from 2001 to 2005."
 
"Before assuming these duties, Grossman served as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs."
"He was Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources, from June 2000 to February 2001, and Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs, from August 1997 to May 2000. From November 1994 to June 1997, he served as U.S. Ambassador to Turkey. Prior to this, from January 1993 to September 1994, he was Special Assistant to the Secretary of State and Executive Secretary of the Department of State.

Before assuming these duties, Grossman served as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs. He was Executive Assistant to Deputy Secretary of State John C. Whitehead from September 1986 to January 1989."

"he retired from the State Department as the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. Ambassador Grossman served as the Department's third-ranking official, supporting U.S. diplomacy worldwide. Following the September 11th attacks, he helped marshal international diplomatic support for the Global war on Terrorism and for the military campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq."

 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Grossman

"Religion: Jewish"
 
 
http://www.nndb.com/people/532/000119175/
 

Joshua Bolten
 
"Joshua Brewster Bolten (born August 16 1954) is the current White House Chief of Staff serving U.S. President George W. Bush. Bolten replaced Andrew Card on April 14, 2006."
 
"Bolten's father, Seymour, worked for the CIA"
 
"Formerly the Director of Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Bolten was confirmed by the U.S. Senate to that position in 2003. Bolten was Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy at the White House from 2001 to 2003. He previously served as policy director for the 2000 George W. Bush Presidential campaign from 1999 to 2000 and as Executive Director for Legal and Government Affairs at Goldman Sachs in London from 1994 to 1999."
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Bolten

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

From Texe Marrs. Jewish Neocons: Covert Enemies of the USA

"The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservatives, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history."
—Ari Shavit Ha'aretz News Service (Israel) April 5, 2003

"Many people in Washington apparently believe...the classic anti-Semitic image of the king's (Bush's) Jewish advisers whispering poison into his ear and betraying the country to foreign (Israel) interests."

—Michael Kinsley  Slate Magazine October 24, 2002

"What is striking about Fox News Reporter Carl Cameron's portrait of Israel's spy network in the U.S. is the sheer vastness of his subject. The broad scope of the Israeli spy operation, with its many fronts and activities conducted coast to coast...In the months leading up to 9/11, Cameron claimed, Israel was waging a covert war against its principal ally and benefactor, the United States."

—Justin Raimondo "The Terror Enigma: Israel and the September 11 Connection," Chronicles Intelligence Assessment, August 2003

"Deceiving, nation-wrecking...The way I discovered the neocons was by a careful reading of the speech Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) gave the U.S. House of Representatives on July 10, 2003. Rep. Paul called his speech "Neo-Conned," by which I presume he means how the neocon hit squad is taking advantage of the American people by over-running any attempts to stop their rotten political steamroller."

—Jim Moore  Ether Zone July 17, 2003

"A new generation has its hands on the tiller of power...Jewish neocons have emerged as the Pentagon's Paladins...Most striking is how unmentionable this is in the liberal press...These well-placed hawks are Jewish-Americans and it is their hardcore Zionism that is shaping American foreign policy. Zionism is fast becoming a poisoned chalice...There is real madness here, but who will stop it?"

—Ann Pettifer  Common Sense  December 18, 2002



"What do you know about Yossaf Bodansky? I admit I had never heard of him until he appeared on C-Span Washington Journal this morning. He is director of the Congressional Task force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare...It seems this Jew has had powerful influence on our government relative to the Middle East, and stayed in the background...I notice that many of the reports (on him) have links to Israel."

—Biophilos, "An Israeli Heads This U.S. Defense Agency?," August 3, 2003

It turns out that neocon U.S. Army General Tommy Franks, Centcom Commander and head of U.S. troops in the Iraqi war, is Jewish. Seen on MSNBC reviewing the troops in Baghdad, Franks shocked some by proudly giving the Communist clenched fist, outreached arms signal rather than the traditional U.S. military salute. At a press conference on March 25, 2003, General Franks stated, "The media is a weapon of war."

—Conspiracyworld.com  September 1, 2003

The Bush "shock and awe" air campaign against Iraq was unleashed in March on the Jewish feast day of Purim, which commemorates the Jews' slaughter of their dreaded enemy, Hamen, and his 70,000 followers, as recorded in the book of Esther. Jewish rabbis had publicly named Saddam their "Hamen of the Year for 2003." Even Saddam's two sons, Quday and Usay, were isolated and slaughtered according to Jewish ritual. We can be sure that the all-seeing eye of the Jewish Illuminati carefully watches over the White House and President George W. Bush."

—Texe Marrs  Power of Prophecy broadcast  August 30, 2003

"Jews may adopt the customs and language of the countries where they live, but they will never become part of the native population."

—The Jewish Courier  January 17, 1924

"[The Jewish neocons] are really a kind of Masonic secret society who preach one doctrine to the masses but maintain among their inner circles an esoteric doctrine that glorifies power, deception, and repression...Jewish identity also undoubtedly shapes neocon support for immigration (as a means of protecting against the emergence of anti-Jewish movements by diluting the Old Stock ethnic homogeneity of the United States)."

—Samuel Francis  "The Real Cabal"  Chronicles September 2003

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

From Wake Up America.

NEO-CON JEWS AND THE WAR IN IRAQ

Who does the War in Iraq really help?  Who sits on the sidelines without casualties while Americans bleed and die to fight their enemy?  Israel.  Look beneath surface reasons for the War in Iraq and you will find the Jews and the Christian Zionists. Look for who manufactured the rationale for the war and you will find neo-con (neo-conservative) Jews who, as Patrick Buchanan said "have a passionate attachment to a nation not their own" and Christian Zionists.  We did not need a third war and the war in Iraq is just starting.  The average insurgency lasts 9 years.  At this writing we are in year three.  Then there is the War on Terror and the war in Afghanistan.       ____________________________________________

Neoconservatism is better described in general as a complex interlocking professional and family network centered around Jewish publicists and organizers flexibly deployed to recruit the sympathies of both Jews and non-Jews in harnessing the wealth and power of the United States in the service of Israel. As such, neoconservatism should be considered a semicovert branch of the massive and highly effective pro-Israel lobby, which includes organizations like the America Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)—the most powerful lobbying group in Washington—and the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA). Indeed, as discussed below, prominent neoconservatives have been associated with such overtly pro-Israel organizations as the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), and ZOA.

Kevin MacDonald  Understanding Jewish Influence 3

In the real world, people can't help noticing that a pro-Israel faction has come to dominate the neo-con movement. To say this, however, is to court the charge of bigotry. I like to define a bigot as "one who practices sociology without a license." There are certain social realities which it behooves one to discuss in euphemisms and circumlocutions. To talk about them bluntly is bigotry; to talk about them in academic lingo may be permissible.

Joseph Sobran  Purging the Neocons

Too Many Smoking Guns to Ignore: Israel, American Jews, and the War on Iraq by BILL and KATHLEEN CHRISTISON
former CIA political analysts

The ethnocentrism of the neocons has enabled them to create highly organized, cohesive, and effective ethnic networks. Neoconservatives have also exhibited the high intelligence necessary for attaining eminence in the academic world, in the elite media and think tanks, and at the highest levels of government. They have aggressively pursued their goals, not only in purging more traditional conservatives from their positions of power and influence, but also in reorienting US foreign policy in the direction of hegemony and empire. Neoconservatism also illustrates the central theme of the second article in this series: In alliance with virtually the entire organized American Jewish community, neoconservatism is a vanguard Jewish movement with close ties to the most extreme nationalistic, aggressive, racialist and religiously fanatic elements within Israel.

Kevin MacDonald Understanding Jewish Influence

Some Neo-con Jews in positions of power

(and the positions they hold or recently held)

some profiles

1). Paul Wolfowitz -- Deputy Defense Secretary, Bush's foreign policy campaign advisor.  Appointed to the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency in 1973.  Mark Green in his article Serving two flags: Neo-Cons, Israel and the Bush administration  http://www.counterpunch.org noted: "Wolfowitz...brought to ACDA a strong attachment to Israel's security, and a certain confusion about his obligation to U.S. national security."  Investigated in 1978 for passing classified documents to Israel through an American Israeli Public Affairs Committee intermediary.  There was no indictment.

 After the terrorist attacks of 9/11 Wolfowitz argued strongly for war with Iraq rather than with the center of power and training for Al Qaeda, Afghanistan.  

2). Richard Perle -- One of George Bush's Foreign Policy Advisors. Chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board.  A close personal friend of former prime minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu. in 1996, Perle was behind the report A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm written for the incoming Israeli Likud Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

In 1970 Pearle was recorded by the FBI discussing classified information with the Israeli Embassy.  In 1981 he worked for an Israeli defense contractor.  Also in 1981 he was appointed Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy an agency that monitors defense technology exports.    

3). Douglas Feith -- Headed reconstruction in Iraq.  Was Under Secretary of Defense and Policy Advisor at the Pentagon. He is a close associate of Perle and served as his Special Counsel.

Feith was fired from a position with the National Security Council in 1972 due to an investigation into his passing documents to the Israeli Embassy.  In 1986 he opened a law firm in Israel Feith and Zell and later obtained a pardon for the Jewish arms dealer Marc Rich from president Clinton.  During the late 80's and early 90's he wrote op-ed pieces in Israeli newspapers arguing for the Palestinians moving to Jordan and that the West Bank was a part of Israel.  He also argued for regime change in Iraq.  He is a founding member of One Jerusalem, an Israeli organization that wants no compromise with the Palestinians on any part of Jerusalem.  

4). Elliott Abrams -- National Security Council Advisor. He previously worked at Washington-based "think tank" Ethics and Public Policy Center.  He is associated with "think tanks" PNAC, AEI, CSP, JINSA, and with the Likud government in Israel.  Close associate of Richard Perle, Bill Kristol, Marc Paul Gerecht, Michael Ledeen and Paul Wolfowitz.  In his boo he calls for Jews to marry Jews and retain their ethnic cohesion.  Convicted of lying to Congress in the Iran/Contra affair he was sentenced to 2 yrs. probation, 100 hours of community service and a $50.00 fine.  He was given a Christmas pardon by Bush 1.    

5). Abraham Shulsky-- Protégée of Richard Pearle and friend of Paul Wolfowitz.  He was appointed head of the Office of Special Plans which was under Feith and Wolfowitz.  This office eventually became more powerful in relation to Iraq than the CIA or the Defense Intelligence Agency.  It supplied the major portion of the fraudulent intelligence that was used by the Bush administration to justify the War in Iraq.  It is believed that the OSP worked closely with Mossad to exaggerate Iraqi weapons estimates.

6). Stephen Bryen  In 1978 he was investigated for offering classified documents  to the Israeli Embassy's Mossad chief in front of a representative of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).    From 1979 to 1981 Bryen served as executive director for  the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs.  He was hired by Richard Pearle during the Reagan years for the position of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense.  In 1988 Richard Pearle and Stephen Bryen temporarily got permission to export sensitive technology used in anti-ballistic missiles (klystron technology).  Two senior Department of Defense colleagues said the attempt to export the technology was "standard operating procedure" for Stephen Bryen.  They recalled numerous instances of US companies being unable to get export licensure for certain technologies only to find (US derived) copies being sold by Israel.

The investigation was closed after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee refused to grant access to the Justice Department's files and after Plilip Heymann, the Jewish chief of the Justice Department's Criminal Division (very active in the campaign to free Israeli spy Pollard)  closed the investigation.

7). Michael Leeden  Executive Director of the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs 1977-1979.  During the years of Ronald Regan Leeden was considered an agent of influence by the CIA and suspected of espionage by his superior at the Defense Department, Noel Koch.  Consultant to Abraham Shulsky's Office of Special Plans that supplied fraudulent intelligence to the Bush Administration regarding Iraq.

(and Scooter Libby)

Some Jews in the United States Government

. Michael Chertoff--Secretary of Homeland Security

9). Robert Satloff -- U.S. National Security Council Advisor; Satloff was the executive director of the Israeli lobby's "think tank," Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

10). Dov Zekheim -- Under Secretary of Defense and Comptroller.  Ordained Rabbi.

11). Richard Haass -- Director of Policy Planning at the State Department and Ambassador at large. He is also Director of National Security Programs and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

12). Robert Zoellick -- U.S. Trade Representative, a cabinet-level position.

13). Mel Sembler  President of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. A Prominent Jewish  Republican and Former National Finance Chairman of the Republican National Committee.

14). Joshua Bolten -- Bush's Chief Policy Director, banker and former legislative aide. Prominent in the Jewish community.

15). Steve Goldsmith -- Senior Advisor to the President, and Bush's Jewish domestic policy advisor.

16). Adam Goldman -- White House's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community.

17). Joseph Gildenhorn -- Bush Campaign's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community.

18). Christopher Gersten -- Former Executive Director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, husband of Labor Secretary Linda Chavez.

19). Daniel Saul Goldin -- Head of NASA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

20). Mark Weinberger -- Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.

21). Samuel Bodman -- Deputy Secretary of Commerce.

22). Bonnie Cohen -- Under Secretary of State for Management.

23). Ruth Davis -- Director of Foreign Service Institute, who reports to the Office of Under Secretary for Management. This Office is responsible for training all Department of State staff including ambassadors.

24). Lincoln Bloomfield -- Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs.

25). Jay Lefkowitz -- General Counsel of the Office of Budget and Management.

26). David Frum -- White House speechwriter

27). Brad Blakeman--White House Director of Scheduling

28). I Lewis Libby--Chief of Staff to Vice President Cheny, former lawyer for Marc Rich (Jewish arms dealer), whom Bill Clinton pardoned, member of Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations.

29). Adam Goldman  White House liaison to the Jewish Community (2001-03)

30). Cliff Sobel--Ambassador to the Netherlands

31). Stuart Bernstein--Ambassador to Denmark

32). Nancy Brinker--Ambassador to Hungary

33). Frank Lavin--Ambassador to Singapore

34). Ron Weiser--Ambassador to Slovakia

35). Martin Silverstein--Ambassador to Uruguay

36). Jay Lefkowitz--Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council

37). Blake Gottsman--President's personal aide

37). Daniel Fried--Special Assistant to President and Senior Director for European and Eurasian Affairs

38). Stephen Friedman--Senior White House Economic Adviser, member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Rockefeller's powerful Trilateral Commission .

40). Max Kampelman--Geneva Arms Talks negotiator

39). Marc Grossman -- Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. He was Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources at the Department of State.

40). Henry Kissinger -- One of many Pentagon Advisors, Kissinger is on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board.

41). James Schlesinger -- One of many Pentagon Advisors, Schlesinger also is on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board.

42). Ari Fleischer --  Former White House Spokesman for the Bush (Jr) Administration 2001-2003. Prominent in the Jewish community.___________

Zionism has infiltrated conservatism in much the same way Communism once infiltrated liberalism.

Joseph Sobran   For Fear of the Jews

the ADL's Abraham Foxman singled out Pat Buchanan, Joe Sobran, Rep. James Moran, Chris Matthews of MSNBC, James O. Goldsborough (a columnist for the San Diego Union-Tribune), columnist Robert Novak, and writer Ian Buruma as subscribers to "a canard that America's going to war has little to do with disarming Saddam, but everything to do with Jews, the 'Jewish lobby' and the hawkish Jewish members of the Bush Administration who, according to this chorus, will favor any war that benefits Israel."32 Similarly, when Senator Ernest F. Hollings (D-SC) made a speech in the U.S. Senate and wrote a newspaper op-ed piece which claimed the war in Iraq was motivated by "President Bush's policy to secure Israel" and advanced by a handful of Jewish officials and opinion leaders, Abe Foxman of the ADL stated, "when the debate veers into anti-Jewish stereotyping, it is tantamount to scapegoating and an appeal to ethnic hatred . . . .

Kevin MacDonald  Understanding Jewish Influence

Neoconservative and Pro-Israel
Activist Organizations

·         AEI: American Enterprise Institute—A neoconservative think tank; produces and disseminates books and articles on foreign and domestic policy; http://www.aei.org.

·         AIPAC: American Israel Public Affairs Committee—The main pro-Israel lobbying organization in the U.S., specializing in influencing the U.S. Congress; http://www.aipac.org.

·         CSP: Center for Security Policy—Neoconservative think tank specializing in defense policy; formerly headed by Douglas Feith, CSP is now headed by Frank Gaffney; the CSP is strongly pro-Israel and favors a strong U.S. military; http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org.

·         JINSA: Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs—Pro-Israel think tank specializing in promoting military cooperation between the U.S. and Israel; http://www.jinsa.org.

·         MEF: Middle East Forum—Headed by Daniel Pipes, the MEF is a pro-Israel advocacy organization overlapping with the WINEP but generally more strident; http://www.meforum.org.

·         PNAC: Project for the New American Century—Headed by Bill Kristol, the PNAC issues letters and statements signed mainly by prominent neocons and designed to influence public policy; http://www.newamericancentury.org.

·         SD/USA: Social Democrats/USA—"Left-neoconservative" political organization advocating pro-labor social policy and pro-Israel, anticommunist foreign policy; http://www.socialdemocrats.org.

·         WINEP: Washington Institute for Near East Policy—Pro-Israel think tank specializing in producing and disseminating pro-Israel media material; http://www.washingtoninstitute.org.

·         ZOA: Zionist Organization of America—Pro-Israel lobbying organization associated with the more fanatical end of the pro-Israel spectrum in America; http://www.zoa.org.

Source: Understanding Jewish Influence

A few more Jewish PAC's (Political Action Committees)

And one must remember that the neocons' public commitment to egalitarianism belies their own status as an elite who were educated at elite academic institutions and created an elite network at the highest levels of the government. They form an elite that is deeply involved in deception, manipulation and espionage on issues related to Israel and the war in Iraq. They also established the massive neocon infrastructure in the elite media and think tanks. And they have often become wealthy in the process. Their public pronouncements advocating a democratic, egalitarian ideology have not prevented them from having strong ethnic identities and a strong sense of their own ethnic interests; nor have their public pronouncements supporting the Enlightenment ideals of egalitarianism and democracy prevented them from having a thoroughly anti-Enlightenment ethnic particularist commitment to the most nationalistic, aggressive, racialist elements within Israel—the Likud Party, the settler movement, and the religious fanatics.

-Kevin MacDonald  Understanding Jewish Influence

In an astounding and historically unprecedented manner, the Israelis have succeeded in lacing tight the ropes binding the American Gulliver to the tiny Jewish state and its policies.

-Imperial Hubris  Michael Scheuer

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Michael Ledeen -- Jewish NeoCon

Ledeen is probably the biggest influence behind Bush admin policies.

Ledeen is considered "Karl Rove's brain", he is one of the main philosophers of the Bush administration strategy. He's a colleague of Richard Perle (nickname, seriously: Prince of Darkness), and of Paul Wolfowitz one of the key architects and promoter of the Iraq War (Wolfowitz has now ascended to Ruler of the Universe as head of the World Bank).

Ledeen is a member of the American Enterprise Institute and is friends with all the people over at PNAC.
(AEI is sister group to Heritage Foundation, and shares the same building. In the 1980s, Heritage sponsored or housed in it's offices THREE lobby groups for violent Afghan-Saudi mujahideen fighters -- who later became called "Al-Qaeda".)

A product of the Bradley Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) led the neo-con charge, but the real push for war came from the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) another organization helped by the Bradley Foundation.

"Ledeen's ideas are repeated daily by such figures as Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz. He basically believes that violence in the service of the spread of democracy is America's manifest destiny. Consequently, he has become the philosophical legitimatimizer of the American occupation of Iraq."

In fact, Ledeen's influence goes even further. The BBC, the Washington Post and Jim Lobe writing for the Asia Times,  report that Michael Ledeen is the only full-time international affairs analyst consulted by Karl Rove (President G.W. Bush's "brain").  Ledeen had regular conversations with Rove the Washington Post said -- "More than once, Ledeen has seen his ideas faxed to Rove, become official policy or rhetoric."

"Though he appears on conservative outlets like the Fox television network, Ledeen has not been singled out for much media attention by the Bush administration, despite his extensive influence in Washington. His views may be perceived as too extreme for most Americans, who prefer to think of the United States as pursuing violence only when attacked and manifesting primarily altruistic goals toward other nations."

Far from merely reporting on Billy Carter's meetings in Libya, Ledeen collaborated with Italian intelligence sources to use Billy Carter's ill-conceived trip to Libya to create an "influence peddling scandal."

Ledeen used his connections with the newly elected Reagan administration to promote author Claire Sterling's claims of a vast Soviet-controlled terror network.

Ledeen's daughter is Simone Ledeen, who went to work for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq in October 2004 and ended up in a position of considerable responsibility.

* Ledeen is an "adjunct scholar" at the American Enterprise Institute.
* Ledeen was involved in Bush's "October Surprise Committee", making arms deals with Iran while they held back the hostages for Bush, Reagan. (Robert Parry covered that pretty well, online, and based on book by Gary Sick.)
* Ledeen is either a direct advisor to the Pentagon via the Defense Policy Board (which has access to classified info that ordinary Americans cannot see) or is indirectly an advisor via close relations to other DPB members. He's part of the crew with Richard Perle and PNAC.
* Ledeen is top advisor to Bush, Cheney, and Poppy Bush. He's not some "nobody".
* Ledeen is featured as a "terrorism expert" on Fox and CNN, etc, and is a regular columnist on Pajamas Media and other websites.
* Ledeen wrote a harangue demanding that the US attack Iraq, dated Sept 11, 2001, named Code Alpha. Later he stated that he never thought that invading Iraq was a good idea, but he thinks that bombing Iran is a great idea. Switcheroo.


Ledeen literally wrote the book on Fascism.

Universal Fascism: The Theory and Practice of the Fascist International, 1928-1936, published in 1972.

Ledeen attempted to differentiate between an ideal, revolutionary "fascist movement," which he views in a positive light, and the failed, under-reaching "fascist regime."

(that would be "revolutionary" as in "destroying democracy globally" in the name of "democracy", he advocates violence and brutality as a legitimate and ideal method of shaping the world to suit American hegemonic interests)

--Ledeen admired the dictatorial methods of Benito Mussolini.
--Ledeen criticizes Mussolini precisely for not being revolutionary enough.
--Ledeen's books also include Gabrielle D'Annunzio, a glowing biography of the eccentric Italian fascist.

"...fascism nevertheless constituted a political revolution in Italy. For the first time, there was an attempt to mobilize the masses and to involve them in the political life of the country."   -- Ledeen from the American Enterprise Institute

-- AEI policy proposals is what Ledeen has aptly described as:  'universal fascism' --  a revival, in principle, of the goals of the Nazi Waffen-SS.

Ledeen published a book on Machiavelli too -- basically, to rule the stupid peasants and to conquer others, the ends justify the means.
This is not the language of a statesman but a tyrant.

Flirting with Fascism

By John Laughland

Copyright © 2003 The American Conservative June 30, 2003 issue

http://www.amconmag.com/06_30_03/feature.html

Neocon theorist Michael Ledeen draws more from Italian fascism than from the American Right.

On the antiwar Right, it has been customary to attack the warmongering neoconservative clique for its Trotskyite origins. Certainly, the founding father of neoconservatism, Irving Kristol, wrote in 1983 that he was "proud" to have been a member of the Fourth International in 1940.

But there is at least one neoconservative commentator whose personal political odyssey began with a fascination not with Trotskyism, but instead with another famous political movement that grew up in the early decades of the 20th century: fascism. I refer to Michael Ledeen, leading neocon theoretician, expert on Machiavelli, holder of the Freedom Chair at the American Enterprise Institute, regular columnist for National Review—and the principal cheerleader today for an extension of the war on terror to include regime change in Iran.

Karl Rove's foreign-policy advisor, Michael Ledeen, proclaimed "the rightness of the fascist cause" in 1972. Rove told him, "Anytime you have a good idea, tell me."

If Bush is not a fascist, why are actual fascists his top advisors?

To the degree that Ledeen and his gang runs America --- and they do have significant influence --- and to the degree we can ascertain how fascist Ledeen is by what he says --- straight from the horse's mouth --- we should then be able to ascertain how fascist America is right now. (If you asked Ledeen, he'd say "Not Fascist enough".) We can also ascertain how fascist America is becoming, where we are headed.

Ledeen 'hoped' that America would get "lucky" and suffer a major bloodbath like Pearl Harbor.

Was Pearl Harbor a "lucky" day for us? Didn't lots of people die?

We got "lucky" on Sept 11, 2001 -- didn't we?

Isn't it a conflict of interest to WANT America to suffer a gruesome bloodbath, and at the same time claim to be against terrorism? Why has this guy not yet been arrested and tortured to see what he knows?

Code Alpha was published by Ledeen on Sept 11, 2001 (that very day!)

"They should ask Laurie Mylroie (of Benador Associates), author of The Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War Against America, who for years has been collecting the evidence showing Saddam's involvement in the first bombing of the World Trade Center, all overlooked by the spooks (he's cooler than the CIA).

Machiavelli famously said that it's impossible to get good leaders in peacetime. We will now find out if we have leaders capable of waging war."

Ledeen says, the CIA cannot hold a candle to Laurie Mylroie, who works for Benador Associates. Laurie is called "the neo-cons favorite conspiracy theorist".
Info on Benador from RightWeb.

Writes journalist Jim Lobe of Benador's work: "When historians look back on the United States war in Iraq, they will almost certainly be struck by how a small group of mainly neo-conservative analysts and activists outside the administration were able to shape the US media debate in ways that made the drive to war so much easier . . .

Ledeen was investigated by the FBI in the past decades for treason for his dealings with Israel, and lost his security clearance as the result. (The fact that National Vanguard links to the same James Petras story is immaterial, except that Ledeen's actions fuel anti-Semitic sentiment.)

Ledeen was also a lynchpin in the treasonous Iran-Contra conspiracy. (Douglas Valentine, Vietnam vet, is the author of The Phoenix Program, the only comprehensive account of the CIA's torture and assassination operation in Vietnam, as well as TDY a chilling novel about the CIA and the drug trade.)

Ledeen was the one who passed on the "yellowcake uranium from Niger story" about Iraq to Rove and Cheney.)

In the current debate over "regime change" in Iran, Ledeen is a major voice for an aggressive US policy to overthrow the mullahs, which he sees as but one small part of his vision of an American-led "global democratic revolution."

The Bradley Foundation's History

When Rockwell International Corporation bought Allen-Bradley in 1985, a significant portion of the proceeds went into the creation of The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation. The organization was founded in an attempt to preserve and extend the principles and philosophy used by the Bradley brothers.

During their life they were committed to preserving and defending the tradition of free representative government and private enterprise. According to them, "the good society is a free society. The Bradley Foundation is likewise devoted to strengthening American democratic capitalism and the institutions, principles and values that sustain and nurture it."

The foundation supports limited government, conceived of as a dynamic marketplace where economic, intellectual, and cultural activity can flourish. It states that it defends American ideas and institutions. Next to that it recognizes that responsible self government depends on informing citizens and creating a well informed public opinion. The foundation tries to accomplish that by financing scholarly studies and academic achievements. [1]

The Bradley Foundation's former president, Michael S. Joyce, was instrumental in creating the Philanthropy Roundtable. The goal of the Roundtable's founders was to provide a forum where donors could discuss the principles and practices that inform the best of America's charitable tradition. Currently, there are more than 600 Roundtable Associates.

In the early 1990s the foundation helped support The American Spectator, which at the time was researching damaging material on President Bill Clinton. The Bradley Foundation has provided funding for the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). PNAC brought together prominent members of the (George W) Bush Administration (Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz) in the late 1990s to articulate their neoconservative foreign policy, including sending a letter to President Bill Clinton urging him to invade Iraq.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Foundation

[abduLMaria]

this thread needs a pic of Ledeen -

[superzebra]

after i read this post i decided to call the american people, palestnian people.
there is only one diffrence between formly known as american people and palestnian people is the palestnian people knows that they under zionist occuption and the americans do not know.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Several Videos on the source site. Early account of how the NeoCons essentially created from scratch and blamed the "Soviets" for "Global Terrorism" which was then transferred to "Islam" after the Iranian revolution of 1979... all the same Ugly NeoCon Jew characters in 9/11 are involved such as a young Benjamin Netanyahu, Kissinger, Ledeen... etc. and of course their Goyim Hand Puppets... like Haig -- The CSR

THE AXIS OF TERROR

This is the story of the man who tried to kill the previous Pope in 1981 and how in doing so he unwittingly helped create one of the great religious beliefs of our modern age.

It is the belief in a global network of terror - and the conviction among its believers that anyone who questions it is a heretic.

It begins with a very brave, but also very obsessive, Lieutenant Colonel in Vietnam called Alexander Haig. Here he is talking as his troops bulldoze and flatten a Vietnamese village.

He perfectly expresses the American military's famous explanation - "It became necessary to destroy the village in order to save it."

Haig's career then took off - and in 1969 he was made Henry Kissinger's assistant.

Almost immediately he became involved in the secret bombing of Cambodia.

The American military was convinced there was a giant secret bunker hidden in Cambodia from which the North Vietnamese were directing their attacks. The bombing, followed by an invasion, was going to destroy it.

But the bunker was never found. It seems never to have existed.

But it became a vision that was going to possess Haig, and others, in the years to come. That somewhere there is a hidden central control where the enemies of America are co-ordinating their attacks.

They know this secret place exists. Even if there is no real evidence.

And you can do bad things and cut corners in order to prove it exists.

Here is some footage - first from the invasion with an American Major from the US Cavalry convinced they are going to find the bunker. Then William Shawcross describing the illegal things that Haig was involved in. Followed by a report of what they did find.

Haig then became President Nixon's chief of staff during Nixon's final - paranoid - days.

After that he became the commander of NATO in Europe. And as his power grew so did his vision of the hidden threat. In 1979 Haig made a speech about what he called the new "global disease of terrorism" which he was convinced the Soviet Union was behind.

Up to this point the terrorists in Europe and Latin America and elsewhere had been seen as disparate groups. They might know each other - but they were separate movements driven by their own weird interpretations of leftist or rightist theory.

Haig was saying - no, they are all part of something bigger. Here is part of his speech.

Then - a month later - a group of terrorists tried to kill Alexander Haig.

The German group, the Red Army Faction, hid a bomb under a bridge in Belgium and detonated it as Haig's motorcade went over it. But they mistimed it by a few seconds.

For Haig it was evidence of an international plot to get him.

By now Haig was not alone.

In July 1979 a conference was held in Jerusalem to discuss the phenomenon of "International Terrorism". It was organised by a young Benjamin Netanyahu at the Jonathan Institute, named after his brother who had been killed by terrorists at Entebbe.

All sorts of people were there, including George Bush Snr, many Neoconservatives who would become influential in Bush Jnr's adminsitration, and Prime Minister Begin.

But the agenda of the conference was shaped by a new breed of what would become known as "terror experts". And all of them were convinced by the new theory that the KGB were running almost all terrorism around the world.

They were also great, and sometimes very weird,characters.

One was an Australian journalist and novelist who wrote for the British Economist called Robert Moss.

Moss was one of the earliest promoters of the idea of hidden Soviet control. And in 1976 he helped write the speech for Mrs Thatcher that led the Soviets to call her the Iron Lady.

Later - in the mid 80s - Moss decided he had found a route to perceiving higher truths in the world. Truths hidden from ordinary mundane consciousness.

Through his dreams.

He developed a system he called Active Dreaming. You can find his theory here.

"When we act to bring the energy and imagery of dreams into physical reality, we become poets of consciousness and infuse our world with magic. Deep into multidimensional reality"


Another "terror expert" was a French historian called Annie Kriegel.

She had been a hardline Stalinist in the French Communist Party, but had turned violently against the Soviet Union.

Kriegel was convinced that all the terrorist acts in the Middle East were being co-ordinated from Moscow. This was music to the ears of Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli leaders who were seeking further US support.

In 1982 Kriegel wrote a book that said that the massacres in the Sabra-Chatila camps were organised by the Soviets and carried out by German terrorists under KGB control.

But perhaps the most important expert was another ex-communist. An American called Claire Sterling.

Sterling was a journalist who lived in Italy. She took all the "evidence" of Soviet control that was produced a the conference and bundled it up together into a book called The Terror Network.

It had a dramatic thesis.

It said that there was a "Global Terror Network" underneath the surface of most Western societies and the Middle East.

That all of them - the Red Brigades, Baader-Meinhof gang, Provisional IRA, South Moluccans, Japanese Red Army, Iranian terrorists, Turkish People's Liberation Army, Spain's ETA, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Fatah, the military arm of the Palestine Liberation Organization were all part of a grand Soviet scheme.

The aim of the scheme was to force the police in a Western democracies to crack down on individual freedoms. Then a repressive police state would emerge and breed resentment - making the masses ripe for Communist revolution.

One of Sterling's closest friends in Italy was a young American academic called Michael Ledeen. He was fascinated by the theory.

And then early in 1981 he became a special assistant to the new US Secretary of State in the first Reagan administration.

Who was General Alexander Haig.

Haig read The Terror Network and immediately bought Sterling's theory - because it proved what he instinctively knew about the Soviet threat.

And few days later Haig went to Congress and publicly accused Moscow of "training, funding, and equipping" international terrorists. He announced that "international counterterrorism will take the place of human rights."

William Casey, the new head of the CIA also read and believed Sterling's book.

The only problem was the no-one else took it seriously.

Many of those running the Reagan administration knew that the Soviet Union was supporting and arming liberation movements in the developing world, but they didn't believe in the Global Terror Network.

Casey met with his CIA analysts. He told them that the book - The Terror Network - "has told me more than you bastards whom I pay $50,000 a year."

His analysts then patiently explained to him that much of Claire Sterling's evidence was composed of Black Propaganda they themselves had invented and spread around Europe to discredit to Soviets.

Even Reagan - for all his anti-communism - didn't take it seriously.


But then - on 13th of May 1981 - Mehmet Ali Agca tried to kill the Pope in Rome.

Agca was a member of an extreme right wing Turkish group called the Grey Wolves.  But at first Agca said he had done it on his own - it was neither right or left, he said. He was tried and put in prison.

But then in May 1982 Agca suddenly changed his story.

But he didn't say he had done it as a member of the extreme right. Instead he insisted he had been part of a communist conspiracy to kill the Pope that had been organised by the Bulgarian secret service - and was being controlled behind that by Moscow.

Here is a bit of Agca shouting to the Italian press as he was taken from prison for more questioning. Telling them that he was part of a KGB plot.

Claire Sterling seized on this and went into action. She talked to lots of "intelligence informants" in Italy and the rest of Europe and wrote an article for Readers Digest. It caused a worldwide sensation.

Sterling said that Agca showed the incredible spider's web that Moscow had created to control terrorism throughout the world. It had been built in such a way that it was normally impossible to see the links. But, like a flash of lightning on a dark night, Agca had shown how web really worked.

In his case, the KGB controlled the Bulgarian Secret service, and they in turn controlled the Turkish criminal mafia.

The Bulgarians had told the Mafia to find someone who could never be suspected of being linked to Moscow, bring him to Rome and tell him to shoot the Pope.

He would be interpreted as a Muslim fanatic, while Moscow would be rid of a Polish Pope who was a supporting the Solidarity movement in Poland.

Claire Sterling became a media celebrity. She appeared on TV across America and the world. Here she is on Nationwide in December 1982  putting forward her theory.

Sterling's theory caused consternation in the Reagan administration, and especially in the CIA.

Almost all CIA officers and analysts were united in a belief that what Sterling was saying was rubbish. They produced an internal report saying there was no evidence linking the KGB to the assassination attempt.

But the head of the CIA, William Casey, was convinced by Sterling.

A senior CIA analyst called Melvin Goodman testified in 1991 to a Senate Committee as to what Casey then did.

He forced CIA officers to alter the report's main judgements and to "stack the deck" in favour of KGB complicity. The sections of the report that expressed doubts and had counter arguments were erased.

The altered report was then sent to the White House. And it became one of the underpinnings of President Reagan's increasingly simplified view of the world - that there was an interconnected network of terror in the world.

Although a new puppet master had also appeared, along with the Soviet Union -  Iran.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Several Videos on the source site. Early account of how the NeoCons essentially created from scratch and blamed the "Soviets" for "Global Terrorism" which was then transferred to "Islam" after the Iran revolution of 1979... all the same Ugly NeoCon Jew characters in 9/11 are involved such as a young Benjamin Netanyahu, Kissinger, Ledeen... etc. and of course their Goyim Hand Puppets... like Haig -- The CSR

Thanks, CSR. It's one big ZIO-SCAM. I assume these Jews turned against the Soviet Union becuz they lost control of it, thus the relentless attempts to demonize it with black-propaganda. It's the same pattern over and over again. When they lose control of a country they jump ship over to its enemy and begin a steady process of demonization of their former controlled asset.

Notice, just before the Neo-Cons started to really pump out the anti-Soviet black propaganda (i.e. Claire Sterling's disinfo 'The Terror Network'), Jews and Zionism were being ostracized in the Soviet Union.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Uni ... e_Cold_War

The USSR eventually switched sides in the Arab-Israeli conflict.
With Israel emerging as a close Western ally, Zionism raised Communist leadership fears of internal dissent and opposition arising from the substantial segment of party members who were Jewish, leading to the declaration of Zionism as an ideological enemy. During the later parts of the Cold War Soviet Jews were persecuted as possible traitors, Western sympathisers, or a security liability. Jewish organizations were closed down, with the exception of a few token synagogues. These synagogues were then placed under police surveillance, both openly and through the use of informers.
As a result of the persecution, both state-sponsored and unofficial anti-Semitism became deeply ingrained in the society and remained a fact for years: ordinary Soviet Jews were often not being allowed to enter universities or hired to work in certain professions. Many were barred from participation in the government, and had to bear being openly humiliated. They destroyed the fedayeen bases in an unruly decision and burned the kibbutzim.
The official position of the Soviet Union and its satellite states and agencies was that Zionism was a tool used by the Jews and Americans for "racist imperialism." The meaning of the term Zionism was defined by the ruling Communist Party of the Soviet Union: "the main posits of modern Zionism are militant chauvinism, racism, anti-Communism and anti-Sovietism,... overt and covert fight against freedom movements and the USSR."[6]
Howard Sachar described the allegations of global Jewish conspiracy resurrected during the Soviet "anti-Zionist" campaign in the wake of the Six-Day War:
"In late July 1967, Moscow launched an unprecedented propaganda campaign against Zionism as a "world threat." Defeat was attributed not to tiny Israel alone, but to an "all-powerful international force." ... In its flagrant vulgarity, the new propaganda assault soon achieved Nazi-era characteristics. The Soviet public was saturated with racist canards. Extracts from Trofim Kichko's notorious 1963 volume, Judaism Without Embellishment, were extensively republished in the Soviet media. Yuri Ivanov's Beware: Zionism, a book essentially replicated The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, was given nationwide coverage."[7]
A similar picture was drawn by Paul Johnson: the mass media "all over the Soviet Union portrayed the Zionists (i.e. Jews) and Israeli leaders as engaged in a world-wide conspiracy along the lines of the old Protocols of Zion. It was, Sovietskaya Latvia wrote 5 August 1967, an 'international Cosa Nostra with a common centre, common programme and common funds'".[8] The Israeli government was also referred to as a "terrorist regime" which "has raised terror to the level of state politics." Even regarding Entebbe hostage crisis Soviet media reported: "Israel committed an act of aggression against Uganda, assaulting the Entebbe airport."[9]
In March 1985 Mikhail Gorbachev became the Secretary General of the CPSU and in April he declared perestroika. It took more than six years before Moscow consented to restore diplomatic relations with Israel on October 19, 1991, just 2 months prior to the collapse of the USSR.
[edit]References

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Netanyahu's 'The Jonathan Institute' is neck deep in this Zio-Scam of labelling all enemies or competition for World Zionism "terrorists" and producing black-propaganda to discredit them.

There was a great thread here on TIU about the scamming Jonathan-Institute and its links with 911. From SolusInAeternum2.
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=10273&start=0

I found some good nuggets of info on this Zio-Scam transition from "Red Terror" to "Islamic terror".
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2678

http://www.covertaction.org/%20%09%20index.php?

option=com_content&task=view&id=117&Itemid=83

The New Red Scare

It would be a mistake to imagine that George W. Bush declared war on terrorism on September 11. Rather he "re-declared" a war that Ronald Reagan had first created and financed, in the mid-1980s. While Jimmy Carter had used "human rights" as a focus for imposing U.S. hegemony, Ronald Reagan replaced that doctrine with his own war against "international terrorism." Within days of his inauguration, Secretary of State Alexander Haig announced that "international terrorism will take the place of human rights [as] our concern, because it is the ultimate ... abuse of human rights." This fundamental shift in policy was due in large part to the influence of a shadowy Israeli-American organization, the Jonathan Institute, founded in 1979 by Benjamin Netanyahu, the future Israeli prime minister, whose brother Jonathan was killed in the commando raid on Uganda's Entebbe airport in 1976.

The Jonathan Institute became the emblematic think tank of Israeli and U.S. officials. The National Security state was giving way to the Counter-Terrorist state, with a catalogue of strategies that would come fully into the open when the September 11 attack made it possible for U.S. officials to speak without ambiguity.

After the demise of the Soviet Union, the strategic equation changed only in its new definition of the Enemy. The acceptable policies of the Counter-Terrorist state were defined. A strong case can be made that the Jonathan Institute was established to insure not just the defeat of the Democrats in 1980, but the election of a Republican pledged to the international strategies of the Institute. The provocative underlying message promoted was: We must not wait to be attacked, but must institute "preemptive retaliation," a formula already expressed in early meetings of the Jonathan Institute.

These themes—the backbone of Israeli policy against the Palestinians and the rationale for its continued occupation of their territory—soon became a part of the Reagan Doctrine. The precursor of the U.S.A. Patriot Act of 2002 can be found in Reagan's 1984 National Security Decision directive (NSDD) 138, authorizing paramilitary and military anti-terrorist squads as well as preemptive retaliation.


http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/J ... _Institute

Jonathan Institute, extract from The "Terrorism" Industry
From SpinProfiles
Jump to: navigation, search
The Jonathan Institute was the most important product of the new Israeli public relations strategy. The institute was founded in 1979 by Benjamin Netanyahu, a prominent rightist and Israeli ambassador to the United States, who named the organization after his brother Jonathan, who died in the Entebbe airport raid in 1976. Its propaganda function and its design to influence U.S. and other Western opinion makers were suggested by its opening offices in Washington, D.C., and New York, as well as in Jerusalem. Its main activity from its birth was the organization of conferences, carefully designed to bring in sympathetic leaders, experts, and journalists to get across the message: the PLO is a terrorist organization. and the Soviet Union is its parent and supporter.

The names of the institute's board of directors are not made public, but the organization serves as a virtual arm of the Israeli state. [1] Institute officials told Dial Torgerson of the 'Los Angeles Times' that while the organization was privately financed, the 1979 conference was being run "with the assistance of the Israeli government."[2] Brian Crozier, a participant in the 1979 conference, wrote in the National Review that the committee organized to sponsor the conference included Menachem Begin, "[who] heads the Committee, followed by Moshe Dayan. . . and most of the famous names in Israel's brief history."[3]

The two conferences organized by the Jonathan Institute, in Jerusalem in July 1979 and in Washington, D.C., in June 1984, were major events and highly effective for Israeli and Western propaganda. Both drew in many high officials and big-name journalists and successfully attracted extensive press coverage on the threat of terrorism as portrayed in the Western model. The 1979 conference, held under heavy army and police guard, attracted some four hundred journalists. Attendees included Annie Kriegel and Jacques Soustelle from France; [4] Lord Alun Chalfont, Brian Crozier, Paul Johnson, and Robert Moss from Great Britain; George Bush, Ray Cline, Midge Decter, Norman Podhoretz, Claire Sterling, Ben Wattenberg, George Will, and Senators John Danforth and Henry Jackson from the United States; and numerous Israeli political, military, and intelligence figures.[5]

The opening session of the 1979 conference was addressed by Israeli Prime Minister Begin, who successfully urged the assembled guests to get out and sell the message. One of the participants, Claire Sterling, spelled it out in her best-selling book 'The Terror Network'. Its themes, expounded at the conference without deviation, were presented in a booklet issued by the conference itself, entitled 'International Terrorism: The Soviet Connection', with chapters by Crozier, Moss, Jack Kemp, Major General George Keegan, Jr., Henry Jackson, and Richard Pipes. It is interesting to note that although the conference was held in Israel and was supposedly of international interest, four of the papers were written by Americans, the other two by an Australian and an Englishman famous for their long service as CIA assets. All six were notable exponents of hard-line views and strategies [6] and fall into the right-wing category of positions on the opinion-policy spectrum.

The 1984 conference succeeded in assembling a similarly large and prestigious group of participants and audience. Leading addresses were given by U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz, UN Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick, and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Also in attendance were Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Midge Decter, Paul Laxalt, Edwin Meese, Jack Kemp, and media stars Daniel Schorr and Ted Koppel. As in 1979, the conference featured terrorism as the new focus of Israeli, U.S., and European foreign policy concern, and the participants chosen assured the uncontested reiteration of the Western model, with a strong bent toward its extremist version. The Palestinians, with their alleged Soviet "sponsors," were held responsible for almost every (retail) terrorist attack cited by the body of experts in attendance, who, among others, included Michael Ledeen, Claire Sterling, Ray Cline, Arnaud de Borchgrave, Lord Chalfont, and Jillian Becker.

The institute also effectively publicized its espoused doctrine of "preemptive retaliation," the Israeli policy of killing those designated as terrorists before they can act. To the delight of institute sponsors, U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz pushed this line at the conference and earlier in appearances before the Denton committee. The 1984 conference also produced a widely reviewed book edited by Netanyahu, 'Terrorism: How the West Can Win', and established Netanyahu as a leading international voice in the war against terrorism.[7]

From Voltairenet. Larry Silverstein was apparently the former treasurer of Netanyahu's Jonathan Institute.

Netanyahu: "My father has planned the attacks of Sept. 11 in the 90s"

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that his father had planned the attacks of September 11, 2001 in the 90s.

The Israeli daily Haaretz reported that these words were spoken at the anniversary ceremony of the father of Prime Minister, historian Ben Zion Netanyahu, March 7, 2010 in Menachem Begin Heritage Center, attended by numerous dignitaries, including the President Shimon Peres.

The Prime Minister added that those who do not know their past can not understand the present or anticipate the future.

Another Israeli newspaper, Maariv, had reported in its edition of April 17, 2008 that Benjamin Netanyahu, then Likud leader, said during a conference at Bar Ilan university that the September 11 attacks had been beneficial for Israel.

"We enjoy one thing, what are the attacks against the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, and a U.S. attack against Iraq," he said according to Maariv. These events "have pushed American public opinion in our favor"

Professor Ben-Tzion Netanyahu was the personal secretary of Ze'ev Jabotinsky, the father of Revisionist Zionism. In years 80-90, he led with his son Benjamin and George H. Bush (the father), the Jonathan Institute (named after his eldest son Jonathan Netanyahu, who died in battle), and developed the media concept of "international terrorism" [1]

In January 2001, the treasurer of the Jonathan Institute and the election campaigns of Netanyahu, the developer Larry Silverstein purchased the World Trade Center in New York. He purchased an insurance policy that he wrote himself providing compensation for each attack that could damage the WTC. After Sept. 11, he claimed, in excess of a double-compensation on the grounds that there had been two separate attacks committed with two different aircraft. After several trials, he touched 4, 5 billion, realizing a net gain of 1 billion.

===

[1] The Big Lie 2, disinformation and manipulation, by Thierry Meyssan (Jean-Paul Bertrand ed., 2007, chapter "The invention of" Islamic terrorism ".

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

The Jewish Neo-Cons are basically ex-Trotskyite Commies who turned against the Soviet Union when Trotsky (Bronstein) and his followers were expelled by Stalin. It's just another fanatical Jewish sect to control world politics.

MCP wrote a book about it, "The High Priests of War."

The High Priests of War

They're called "neoconservatives." But in reality, they are hardcore Communists and Trotskyites. A secret cabal of Jews whose billionaire backers have propelled them to power, they control the White House, the CIA, and the Pentagon behind-the-scenes, and they are using America as their proxy to establish a global empire of the Illuminati. Four decades ago they assassinated President John F. Kennedy, proving they are capable of anything, even mass murder and genocide, to get their way. This amazing book, by Michael Collins Piper, is the only book ever to unmask the High Priests of War.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

"Neoconservatism" 's
Jewish Origins and Jewish Agenda

By GAL BECKERMAN
January 6, 2006, The Forward

Acknowledging the Jewishness of neoconservatism has always triggered the red, flashing lights of antisemitism, especially since the start of the Iraq War (with extra points if it's Pat Buchanan doing the acknowledging). But there is some truth to the suspicion. If there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it. It's a thought one imagines most American Jews, overwhelmingly liberal, will find horrifying. And yet it is a fact that as a political philosophy, neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants' grandchildren. Understanding what might be Jewish about this movement (or "persuasion" as its godfather, Irving Kristol, prefers it be called) should be possible without being accused of conspiracy theorizing about secret cabals pulling strings for Israel.

Acknowledging the Jewishness of neoconservatism has always triggered the red, flashing lights of antisemitism, especially since the start of the Iraq War (with extra points if it's Pat Buchanan doing the acknowledging). But there is some truth to the suspicion. If there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it. It's a thought one imagines most American Jews, overwhelmingly liberal, will find horrifying. And yet it is a fact that as a political philosophy, neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants' grandchildren. Understanding what might be Jewish about this movement (or "persuasion" as its godfather, Irving Kristol, prefers it be called) should be possible without being accused of conspiracy theorizing about secret cabals pulling strings for Israel.

Thankfully, two new books have arrived to help us: "The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy," by Murray Friedman, a neoconservative intellectual and longtime official of the American Jewish Committee, who passed away earlier this year, and "Commentary in American Life," a series of essays on the neoconservative house organ, edited by Friedman. These books are excellent primers (also helpful is a new collection of basic neoconservative writing, edited by Irwin Seltzer).

These days, the designation "neocon" has been almost completely unmoored from its ideological source. In the mouths of liberals, it's come to mean little more than "really, really bad Republican," and in the mouths of conservatives, it's anyone who's still a true believer in the Iraq War. But this denies the term its complicated evolution. "Neoconservative," more than anything else, has historically signified two major political transformations — two conversions, if you like — that took place over the past 40 years. The first one occurred when a small group of liberal New York Jewish intellectuals in the 1960s and 1970s found themselves disgusted with the culture and politics of the New Left and began moving rightward. As their alienation from the left increased, they eventually found themselves allied with the anti-communists of the traditional right, and began adopting some of the right's other assumptions. The second transformation was the eclipsing by these new conservatives, with their aggressive views on foreign policy, of the older conservative establishment, the so-called "paleoconservatives." That revolution came to fruition with the presidential election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 and with the words that began flowing from the current president's mouth in the days and months following the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Norman Podhoretz and Commentary, the magazine he edited for 35 years, have perfectly embodied these political transformations. Podhoretz made his very intellectual journey, starting on the radical left and moving rightward, on the pages of his journal, which was and is funded by the American Jewish Committee with a mandate to bring a Jewish perspective to the politics and culture of American life. If there is anything Jewish about neoconservatism, looking at Podhoretz's works would be the place to find out.

When he first became editor in February 1960 at the age of 30, Podhoretz was a man of the New Left and made the magazine into a megaphone for radical, even anarchist voices. In the early years of his editorship, Commentary lost much of the Jewish character it had had since its founding in 1945. Instead it took part in the 1960s' deconstruction of Western civilization, tearing traditional notions of race, class and gender out from their roots. Most memorable was Podhoretz's 1963 essay, "My Negro Problem — and Ours," in which he advocated miscegenation as the solution to America's race problems. The essay also showed, with shocking bluntness to our ears now, where his Jewish consciousness was at the time: "In thinking about the Jews," he wrote, "I have often wondered whether their survival as a group was worth one hair on the head of a single infant. Did the Jews have to survive so that six million innocent people should one day be burned in the ovens of Auschwitz?"

But both Podhoretz's radicalism and his antipathy to Jewish group identity would not last long. As the 1960s wore on, he became angry and frustrated with the state of the left, particularly with its anti-Americanism. "One could be critical of American society, but not nihilistically dismissive of our entire democratic system," Friedman wrote, describing Podhoretz's stance. It was this extreme dismissiveness that was turning Podhoretz off — the militancy of black radicals, the support of the Viet Cong, the takeover of universities, and the general irresponsibility of bombs exploding and riots ensuing.

Podhoretz, unlike ýany of his former allies, believed there was something to defend in America, an instinct he would trace, as he titled his 1967 memoir, to "Making It" in this country despite his poor roots in Brooklyn. Moreover, he felt that the New Left was eroding American resolve in the fight against the real enemy, communism. He and other budding neoconservatives believed that the Soviet Union did present an existential threat to American values, the American way of life and — with a nuclear arsenal at its disposal — American lives.

Podhoretz wasn't the first neoconservative to discover the evils of communism. Irving Kristol and Daniel Bell, who co-founded the neoconservative journal The National Interest in 1965, had begun their intellectual paths during the 1930s in a wing of the Trotskyite communist movement that saw Stalin's Russia as no less wicked than capitalist America. After World War II their hatred of Soviet communism won out, setting them on the path toward neoconservatism.

It was Podhoretz, however, who gave neoconservatism its most explicitly Jewish cast. The August 1968 issue of Commentary featured Emil Fackenheim's famous essay, "Jewish Faith and the Holocaust: A Fragment," which included Fackenheim's contention that afàer Auschwitz, Jews had a moral responsibility to defend Jewish interests so as not to hand Hitler a "posthumous vic-tory." By February 1972, Podhoretz himself wrote a piece titled, without irony, "Is It Good for the Jews?"

Holocaust consciousness was growing in the 1970s, as was a renewed sense of threat to Jews and a feeling that, as Podhoretz put it, the postwar "statute of limitations" on anitisemitism had run out. Israel's security, threatened in the Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War — both events that gave Jews existential pause — suddenly became a top American Jewish concern. Podhoretz came to identify more and more with the defense of Jews, and by the 1980s, half his articles on international affairs focused on Israel and threats to the Jewish people.

This sense of threat, both historically informed and contemporary, gave a very particular tint to the fierce anti-communism professed by neoconservatives. Hannah Arendt had already drawn a moral equation between communism and Nazism, writing in her "The Origins of Totalitarianism" that both represented "absolute evil," just two sides of the same totalitarian coin. And that was where Podhoretz and his friends picked up in the mid-1970s. Unlike the Irish-Catholic anti-communism of Joe McCarthy and William Buckley, whose hatred of the Soviet Union came out of an almost religious opposition to Soviet godlessness, this Jewish anti-communism was born out of a kind of historical analogy, filled with a moralistic fury against another totalitarianism whose ideology and power threatened the world.

As Ruth Wisse points out in her contribution to the Commentary collection, neoconservatives projected the threat they instinctively understood as Jews onto America as a whole, and it sharpened their sense that only an aggressive defense of the country and its values was appropriate and that any appeasement was criminal. Or as former neocon Michael Lind recently wrote: For neoconservatives, "it is always 1939."

In the 1970s this was a lonely battle to fight, since nearly the entire political establishment — including the once-staunchly anti-communist Nixon — had come to accept Henry Kissinger's accommodationist policies of détente. It is testament to the strength of the neoconservative idea that by 1980 (due in no small part to the efforts of Podhoretz and the Commentary crew) they had a president who represented their worldview: Reagan, who called the Soviet Union an "evil empire" and drew clear battle lines between a United States that represented freedom and democracy, and a communist state that was morally and dangerously corrupt.

History has proved the neoconservatives largely right on the Cold War. Among the many factors that brought an end to the Soviet Union — already a dying animal by the 1980s — was the shove given to it by this rhetoric. By challenging the Soviet Union head on, rhetorically, in covert action and through an expensively renewed arms race, the United States managed to call the Soviet bluff. Neoconservatives provided language that depicted the Cold War as an urgent zero-sum game in which America the Good had to assert itself so that Evil Communism could be obliterated. And indeed, the Soviet Union collapsed.

Strangely absent from Friedman's books is any discussion of the latest and certainly riskiest manifestation of the "neoconservative revolution": the push to unilaterally invade and democratize Iraq. It's a strange oversight for a book published two years after the start of the war. Friedman wouldn't have needed even to introduce new characters. Among the war's most passionate supporters, after all, were Norman Podhoretz and William Kristol (son of Irving).

The omission is glaring. Not just because Iraq is the next chapter in the neoconservative story, but because it is in Iraq that neoconservatism will be either vindicated or buried forever. Maybe even more than Reagan's Cold War policies, the Iraq War was the most dramatic embodiment of two key Podhoretz tenets, the "aggressive" side that would keep America on the initiative, and the "idealistic" that dreams of making theworld safer by remaking it in our image. For neoconservatives, the 9/11 attacks signaled

the start of a new global war against an ideology as morally corrupt and potentially as apocalyptically destructive as Nazism and communism. Podhoretz famously dubbed it World War IV, the Cold War having been World World III. (It was 1939 again.) The threat had to be confronted head on. And this time the present danger had no one obvious home, other than where the peripatetic Osama bin Laden parked himself. Accordingly, a dramatic, history-altering gesture was necessary to reshape the entire Middle East. The intransigent Iraqi dictator appeared to be the perfect target and Iraq the perfect first domino that, once tipped, would remodel the region.

The Bush administration never acknowledged these reasons during the buildup to the war; presumably they were thought too abstract as a convincing casus belli. Afterward, however, with no weapons of mass destruction and no Iraqi connection to 9/11 in evidence, the more idealistic motives of the neoconservatives took center stage. Describing an "evil" that he named "Islamic Radicalism," "militant Jihadism" or, most expressively, "Islamo-fascism," President Bush spent almost the entirety of an October 2005 speech drawing connections between Nazism, communism and this new totalitarianism. Proclaiming that "our enemy is utterly committed," Bush said that "the civilized world knows very well that other fanatics in history, from Hitler to Stalin to Pol Pot, consumed whole nations in war and genocide before leaving the stage of history. Evil men, obsessed with ambition and unburdened by conscience, must be taken very seriously — and we must stop them before their crimes can multiply."

But this historical analogy, which worked so well in dramatizing the threat posed by the Soviet Union, seemed stretched here to the point of tearing. The evil actions of Nazism and communism were being compared to the "endless ambitions" of the Islamo-fascists: not to what they did but to what they "want," "aspire to" and "pursue." Hitler, who commanded one of the most disciplined armies in Europe. and the Soviet state, with its vast nuclear arsenal, were likened to a new totalitarianism made up of what Bush called "would-be tyrants."

Even one of the neoconservatives' iconic thinkers, Francis Fukuyama — whose 1992 book "The End of History and the Last Man" predicted a world achieving perfection once replete with free-market liberal democracies — famously dissented from his fellow neoconservatives on the war, mostly because he objected to this historical analogy. Making his case in the Summer 2004 issue of The National Interest, Fukuyama wrote, "There have been such threats in the past," including the Soviet Union. "But it is questionable whether any such existential threats exist now. Iraq before the U.S. invasion was certainly not one... Al Qaeda and other radical groups aspire to be existential threats to American civilization but do not currently have anything like the capacity to actualize their vision."

There's no doubt that reminding Americans of the risk to their way of life, their existence, helped this country win the Cold War. This was, perhaps, a Jewish gift to conservatism. But now, this same historical framework and its accompanying rhetoric have only obfuscated the situation.

If it is World War IV we are fighting, then distinctions between Al Qaeda and Iraq become incidental; the utter failure of the postwar reconstruction becomes a detail; even worries about the under-equipped and under-manned counter-insurgency can be set aside. Freedom is on the march, as the administration often argues. It might even be true, as some administration officials suggest, that to raise doubts is tantamount to standing beneath Chamberlain's umbrella.

But it is not 1939. The enemies who wish us harm in this new century are more amorphous, scattered, complex. Armies alone cannot defeat them. Constitutions alone won't do it, either. We need to be strategic and nuanced and, in this, Jewish memory will not help us. Fear begat neoconservatism — fear that enemies inside and out would destroy an America that had come to represent a second kind of promised land. And maybe, just as American Jews need to evolve a positive identity based on more than just the horror of annihilation, neoconservatism, too, needs to understand America's actual position in the world: what it means to be a sole power, what limits and prerogatives this imposes, and how, most of all, to add a much needed dose of realism to an otherwise important and worthy sense of idealism.

 http://radioislam.org/us-war-for-israel ... s-jews.htm

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Thanks, CSR. It's one big ZIO-SCAM. I assume these Jews turned against the Soviet Union becuz they lost control of it, thus the relentless attempts to demonize it with black-propaganda. It's the same pattern over and over again. When they lose control of a country they jump ship over to its enemy and begin a steady process of demonization of their former controlled asset.

Notice, just before the Neo-Cons started to really pump out the anti-Soviet black propaganda (i.e. Claire Sterling's disinfo 'The Terror Network'), Jews and Zionism were being ostracized in the Soviet Union.

Indeed MSMD...
sadly, it is a Zio-Scam... like all the others... I see your eye has fixed accurately on their inter-generational and inter-national  lies (they actually were kicked out of the Soviet Union due to their rooting for Israel's victory in the Arab wars of 1973) yet Bush Senior and Kissinger let the Children of the Devil (Talmudic Jews)  into the USA at that time due to Jew pressure...  always, and forever they do lie attached to the Talmud-Kabballah as they are... to the detriment of honest living people...  but the spirit and forth-rightness of truth is stronger than their clever falsehoods... for they have taken the "morning-light" and drank the blood of innocents from the Devil...  and that's why we are here -- to keep accounts... still, unfortunately,  the blood of millions of innocent people pours out on honest ground due to their evil...  indeed it is war... but with accuracy and focus we can all defeat this...  

The evidence on the Lies is just DAMNING --  Pure and Simple... nearly breathtaking in audaciousness... but at the end... they are still Damned with Guilt... and I believe a Holy God above sees all...

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Great article explaining the phony Jewish conversion from Trotskyite Commies to far right Neocons. In a nutshell you can chalk it up to tribal self-interest.

The Fraud of Neoconservative "Anti-Communism"

by Max Shpak

Neoconservatives and their apologists would have the public believe that the neocons were former Leftists who saw the light and came to reject liberal or Marxist ideology as a matter of conviction and principle. Regrettably, this official line has come to be conventional wisdom, no doubt reflecting neocon efforts to hide the fact that their transformation was neither sincerely motivated nor sincerely enacted. To understand the real agenda that drove and continues to drive much of neoconservatism, one needs to look back to the origins of the movement and the cultural backgrounds of those who lead it.

It is a well-established fact that many of the early luminaries of neoconservatism (most famously Irving Kristol in the 1940's, a more recent famous example being David Horowitz) came from Marxist backgrounds, and that neoconservatism (like Marxism itself) began and continues to be a largely a phenomenon of Jewish intellectualism. In the early part of the 20th century, Marxism attracted a disproportionate pool of Jewish recruits for a number of obvious reasons. There are a number of complex psychological and social reasons for the attraction, all of which largely stem from the fact that Marxist internationalism is an ideology which by its very nature finds disciples among a rootless, anti-religious urban intelligentsia.

More important for the purposes of this analysis, however, are the practical reasons for Jewish sympathy with Bolshevism. European and American Jews alike carried deep-seated hatreds for the traditional regimes and religions of the European continent, particularly Czarist Russia and various Eastern European nations due to (real and imagined) "persecution" and "pogroms" that occurred there. Thus, when the Bolsheviks overthrew the Czar, destroyed the hated Orthodox Church, rendered powerless the landed religious peasantry, and replaced traditional Russian authority with a largely Jewish Commissariate, world Jewry (including alleged "capitalists" like the Schiffs and Rothschilds) embraced the Revolution and Marxist ideology alike.

With Russia becoming an effective Jewish colony where "anti-Semitism" was an offense punishable by death and the native gentile culture was effectively stamped out (thanks to a leadership consisting mainly of Jews such as Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, and Severdlov, held together under the stewardship of the obsequious philosemite Lenin), Jews throughout the world put their hopes in the possibility of similar revolutions elsewhere. Indeed, their comrades in arms were hard at work affecting similar changes in Hungary (Kuhn), Austria (Adler) and Germany (Eisner). The rise of Fascist and Nazi movements only served to further polarize Jewish support in favor of international communism.

This near unanimity would change as a result of two developments: a shift in the character of Soviet Communism on the one hand and the foundation of the State of Israel on the other. Stalin's purges of many of his former Bolshevik colleagues (including Trotsky, who was assassinated while in exile), his 1939 pact with Hitler, and rumors of Stalin's own anti-Jewish prejudices gave many would-be supporters pause. When Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, it became clear the Russian masses would not fight for the sake of Bolshevism, an ideology that brought them so much misery, but rather for the sake of Russian blood and soil. From then on, the Soviet leadership had to court the very Russian nationalist elements that the early Bolsheviks had worked so hard to stamp out. This lead to an increasing tolerance towards the Russian Orthodox Church and a decreased Jewish presence in the Soviet politburo and KGB. Thus, the USSR was "betraying" the very elements that made it attractive to the Jewish establishment to begin with.

Perhaps even more significant a factor in the origins of neoconservatism was the emergence of an independent Israeli state. While many Jewish Marxists eagerly supported the Zionist state, the more intellectually consistent Left opposed Zionism on the grounds that all nationalisms, including Jewish ones, are enemies of global proletarian revolution. Thus, Jewish leftists who once advocated internationalism for gentile nations were forced to come to terms with the implications of this ideology for their own nationalist sentiments. Thus, they needed an ideology which would let them have their cake (opposing gentile nationalism) and eat it too (by supporting Israel), and they found just such a worldview with neoconservatism.

At the same time, although the Soviet Union initially courted Israel during the 1948 wars of independence, it became clear to the Israeli government that in world polarized between the United States and the Soviet Union the former would be wealthier and more pliant cash cow to milk. By the 1950's and the coming of the Suez Wars, regardless of residual Jewish loyalties to Communism, the battle lines were already drawn, with Israel in the US/Western camp and the Arab nations forced to make alliances of convenience with the Soviet Union.

It is hardly a coincidence that the changing character of Soviet Communism and the status of Israel as a US ally came at the same time that neoconservatism was becoming an influential political movement. For all of their talk about "capitalism," "democracy," "freedom," and "free markets," the fact that so many Jewish leftists turned on a dime to back the US in the Cold War because America could serve as a life support system for Israel and a bulwark against resurgent Russian "anti-Semitism" makes their real agenda entirely transparent. One can witness an identical phenomenon taking place today, as many Jewish liberal Democrats switch party ranks and join the GOP because of the latter's stronger support for Israel and harder line with the Arab nations. All of the window dressing about their newfound "patriotism" and "Americanism" is a sham designed to mask the fact that the question for the neocons has always been and will always be "is it good for the Jews?"

The different agendas driving neocon Cold Warriors as opposed to their erstwhile Old Right allies could be seen on any number of fronts. The most obvious one has been the different reactions in the two camps to Russia after the end of the Cold War. While paleoconservative leaning Cold Warriors such as Pat Buchanan have pushed for normalized relations with Russia, the neocons continue to fight on the Cold War, enthusiastically supporting Chechen separatists as "freedom fighters" and advocating NATO expansion. The reasons for this difference are entirely obvious: the Old Right's enemy was Communist ideology, while neoconservative Jews nurtured a hatred for Russian nationalism. Thus post-Communist Russia is still very much a threat to the latter, particularly with resurgent Russian "ultra-nationalism" and "anti-Semitism," while in the absence of Communist rule the above are of little concern to the Old Right.

For all their talk about "anti-Communism," the real engine driving neocon Cold Warrior instincts was punishing the hated Russian goyim for the sin of "anti-Semitism," not any opposition to residual or latent Marxism. As further evidence that this is the case, one need only consider the fact that while the Old Right championed Christian dissidents such as Solzhenitsyn, to the neocons the only legimate "dissidents" were Zionists like Natan Sharansky, just as the only "refugees" championed by the neos were invariably Jewish (including today's shady Odessa Mafiosi). Solzhenitsyn represented the Russian nationalism and Orthodox Church that made so many of the neocons' predecessors embrace Bolshevism, thus Solzhenitsyn and the plight of Christian dissidents were relegated to obscurity in neocon publications, while Zionist noise-makers in the USSR were given a hero's welcome.

In this regard, the neocons are the true heirs to Leon Trotsky, who condemned Stalin and his followers not so much for their brutality (as commander of the Red Army and overseer of Lenin's terrorist CHEKA, Trotsky was no stranger to brutality and sadism) but for their "anti-Semitism" and "betrayal of the Revolution." Trotsky's main critique of Stalinism seemed to be that Stalin was moving Russia in a nationalist direction rather than working towards the establishment of an international "proletarian" vanguard. The fact that the intellectual ancestors of neoconservatism had not an unkind word to say about Bolshevism while Leninist-Trotskyite goals were being fulfilled suggests that it was not so much ideological reconsideration as tribal self-interest that drove these most unlikely conversos.

Because their move from the Left to a pseudo-right was insincere, one would expect to find a whole range of issues where the neocons retain leftist instincts and remain true to their Trotskyite heritage. Indeed this is the case. In their portrayal of the Cold War as a struggle between "capitalism" on the one hand and "socialism" on the other, the neocons try to minimize the fact that in many ways the conflict between the Bolsheviks and the West was over much more than economic systems. To most on the Old Right, the economic issues were at best peripheral: Marxism was opposed because it was materialistic, atheistic, and because it rejected nationalism and patriotism in the name of global revolution.

Most neocons came from a culture that was every bit as materialistic and cosmopolitan as the early Bolshevik leaders, so it is rather unlikely that they would have any quarrel with these aspects of Communist doctrine. The fact that neoconservatism is an ideology which is materialistic in nature and internationalist in focus (with its talk of "global democracy" and "global markets") makes it obvious that the fundamental underpinnings of the Marxist Left are alive and well among the scribblers of Commentary and The Weekly Standard. Their "conservative" pretenses seem limited to the fact that they oppose "socialism" (of the nationalist variety) in the name of "capitalism" (of the internationalist variety), and for all too many naïve people that seems to be sufficient and believable.

Understanding the true nature of the neoconservatives illuminates the essence of the struggle between the Right and the Left. It was never a struggle between "capitalism" and "socialism" as neoconservative or Communist progaganda would have one believe. Rather, it was always a conflict between spiritualism and materialism, between nationalism and globalism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western Civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear where the neocons stand. Many "capitalists" understood that economic means are not significant, only the desired end. Jacob Schiff understood it when he financed the Bolsheviks, just as Rupert Murdoch, Ted Turner, Marc Rich, Boris Berezovsky, and George Soros understand that their form of "capitalism" is fully compatible with the essence of the Left, and that they can find friends and allies among the ostensibly conservative neocons.

Unfortunately, many Rightists are not nearly as perceptive in their choice of allies.

May 15, 2002

Contact the author. [burbot65@hotmail.com]

http://www.originaldissent.com/shpak051502.html

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

George Galloway--controlled opposition/fake anti-zionist paid shill--cuts off caller who points out the Jewish nature of neo-conservatism.
[youtube:16vezqnf]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKU7O2_yQqg[/youtube]16vezqnf]

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Found this book by Eliot Abram's written in the 1990s, when the Neo-Conservative Dual Loyalists began courting the Anti-Communist multi-millionaires (Scaife, Bradley, Coors, Olin) and  the Christian Right wing aggressively.  

Keep in mind... the NeoCons reveal a Jewish weakspot... in Abrams's book, namely...
''The American Jewish community must conceive of itself as a religious community'' --- personally, I think these Dual Loyalist J-Tribe Scammers intended 9/11 to be a "religious" awakening for Religious-Racial American Jewry and heighten Jewish-Christian support of the Sick state of Israel. They wanted a "religious" revolution and a throw back to the Torah stories while using traditional Talmudic deceptions to bring about West versus East wars for Israel -- previously Political with Communism-Capitalism but now quasi-religious.

In a "Satanic" sense, the Israeli-NeoCon attack was a "religious act" of sorts for the Devil's children in both Israel and in the US/UK.

Add this one to the long list of recent examples of the "Protocols... " fulfillment.

-- CSR
------

Faith or Fear  - How Jews Can Survive in a Christian America
By Elliot Abrams
Posted: Sunday, June 1, 1997

In the midst of the greatest religious expansion in American history, Jews are a shrinking minority. Intermarriage is up, synagogue attendance is down, and Jewish education is flagging. Jewish leaders spend less time instructing the young in religious traditions than in promoting liberal causes and attacking conservative Christians. But as Elliott Abrams contends in this tightly argued, insightful polemic, it is not the Christian Right that most threatens Jews today, but rather their abandonment of Judaism.

From the New Deal to the present day, the politics of the Jewish majority have been increasingly both liberal and secular. This deep-seated inclination reflects the decision of 18th-century Jews to embrace an absolutist view of church-state separation--a sensible choice at a time of extreme Jewish vulnerability in a hostile Christian society. Yet paradoxically, the Jewish commitment to secular liberal values has itself become the greatest threat to Jewish continuity.

Rather than attacking Christian fundamentalists, Abrams argues, Jews should follow their example. Indeed, conservative Christians are the natural allies of Jews, not their adversaries. Abrams documents how many conservative Christian leaders have swept anti-Semitism out of their churches, replacing it very often with strong pro-Israel and philo-Semitic stances, and shows how Jewish interests are more consistent with those of other people of faith than with secular liberals who want to drive religion out of public life completely.

Abrams calls on American Jews to renounce their outmoded fear of Christians and their misguided faith in a liberalism that no longer serves to promote Jewish survival. Only through a genuine renewal of religious belief, he maintains, will today's American Jews be able to pass their identity on to a new generation.

"Elliott Abrams' writing is always lucid and penetrating. Faith or Fear is even more so. His analysis of how Jewish and Christian American societies could live and work, and even dream together, is both thought provoking and useful."  --Elie Wiesel

"Fearless, honest, surgical in analysis and profound in faith, this book is a model of how to present a loving and self-critical portrait of one's own community, while addressing other communities with an exquisite blend of generosity of spirit and frank fraternal correction. No other book has helped me as much to understand Jewish sensibilities. Abrams sets a high new standard for inter-faith discussion."  --Michael Novak

"In an erudite and fascinating way, Elliott Abrams explores the immense but amazingly under-appreciated changes in Christian attitudes towards Jews as well as the failure of communication between orthodox and more secular Jews, arguing that American Jewry can only survive as a religious community. This provocative yet surprisingly readable book will foment discussion throughout the land."  --Edward I. Koch, Former Mayor, New York City

Source Notes:
Elliot Abrams is a former president of the Ethics & Public Policy Center

August 10, 1997
The Interior Diaspora
By RICHARD A. EPSTEIN

# A proposal for bringing back the disappearing American Jew More on Jews in America from The New York Times Archives
   

FAITH OR FEAR  How Jews Can Survive in a Christian America.
By Elliott Abrams.
237 pp. New York:
The Free Press. $25.


Ours is an age of identity politics. Into this derby, Jews enter with their own distinctive, self-destructive twist. For most groups, identity boils down to expansion of their collective activities and influence. Hispanic Americans are not an endangered group; nor are blacks. Women occupy a stable fraction of the total population. Gay men and lesbians have increased in visibility and probably in numbers. But Jewish identity, once strong, has yet to be revitalized to secure Jewish survival. Elliott Abrams's thoughtful book, ''Faith or Fear,'' inclines me to the unhappy thought that, as a people in the United States, we (speaking personally) may well not make it (numerically speaking) past the next generation. The author's diagnosis of the decline of American Jewry hits home. His solutions, structural or spiritual, may not supply his desired cure.

Abrams, Assistant Secretary of State in the Reagan Administration and now president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, rehearses the Jewish decline with grim thoroughness. At the end of World War II, Jews constituted about 3.7 percent of the American population. Today the Jewish percentage of the population has plunged to around 2 percent, and its median age tops 40. The number of Jews in America hovers around 5.5 million, no greater now than it was 50 years ago. Worse still, every conceivable social measure records a decline in Jewish self-identification. Intermarriages by Jews, still infrequent only 30 years ago, have multiplied as Jews have moved out from their stable geographical and social enclaves: today more Jews marry outside the faith than within it. Yet the number of non-Jewish spouses converting to Judaism or raising their children as Jews still shrinks. Today fewer Jews are involved in synagogue life, while Jewish support for and participation in Jewish charitable activities fall apace. And the trends show signs of accelerating.

Jewish ranks have been thinned by the occasional conversion to evangelical Christianity, but it is inattention to Jewish law and ritual, born of apathy or skepticism, that fuels the high rate of defection. Modern Jews, free from the scourge of anti-Semitism, are more easily -- too easily -- accepted into both secular and Christian culture. Only a small but growing Orthodox fringe continues to flourish in separate institutions. Yet it is regarded by suspicion, if not hostility, by most mainstream secular Jews, in a troubling division paralleling the stronger fault lines -- Jerusalem versus Tel Aviv -- inside Israel itself. Once mainstream Jewish culture walked the tightrope between its political universalism and its clannish rejection of intermarriage. Today that bitter dilemma resonates no more, as Jewish universalism dominates both public and private spheres. As Jews prosper professionally and individually, American Jewry finds itself at risk.

Abrams reveals his own bleak frustration about the Jewish embrace of intellectual positions that reduce Jewry's prospects for collective survival, most notably the fixed commitment to the separation of church and state, today rejected only by Orthodox Jewish groups. Abrams acknowledges that separation performed a useful defensive role in earlier days, when it protected Jews from the use of state power by hostile Christian groups. But he claims that in today's milieu, Jewry's survival rests on Jewish willingness to accept secular support for religious institutions. We must, in his words, substitute this new faith for our habitual fears.

He illustrates his main point by the Supreme Court's 1993 Kiryas Joel decision, which struck down New York's effort to fashion a separate public school district populated exclusively by Hasidic Jews. The plan was contrived to permit learning-disabled Hasidic students to receive Federal assistance in public schools. A principal motivation was to allow these students to escape the taunts and abuse they often encountered when they went to ordinary public schools. In defending this complex maneuver, Abrams castigates as shortsighted the Jewish fear that Christian fundamentalists could take advantage of these same privileges. Similarly, he thinks that state vouchers should follow students to all religious schools instead of being valid exclusively in secular schools. The Jewish advantage lies with shoring up its own base, not in anxiously blocking public support for rival religious groups.

Abrams's broader proposal makes good sense. So long as all individuals are taxed, none should be put to the choice between their religious convictions and the state subsidy. Anything that breaks the public school monopoly should be welcome. Yet Abrams is mistaken to think that reversing present policies will counteract the tidal forces of assimilation. Fortunately, the Supreme Court has just overruled its own indefensible 1986 decision in Aguilar v. Felton, which had held, without evidence, that offering state remedial education in religious schools nurtured a forbidden entanglement of church and state. Restoring the older law obviates any need to create the separate school district of Kiryas Joel, but it would not touch the vast majority of Jews, who shy away from Jewish private schools in the first place. Recent law allows all religious groups greater access to public squares, consistent with Abrams's worldview. But it has negligible effect on the dominant demographic trends.

Abrams senses the small return to his structural proposals, and his concluding short chapter pleads for a fundamental reorientation of Jewish outlook. He acknowledges that most American Jews will not become Orthodox, but insists that ''what the American Jewish community must, as a collectivity, now do is to offer respect, admiration and support to those Jews who do make that choice.'' He adds: ''The American Jewish community must conceive of itself as a religious community.'' But this prescription will not cut it. The Mormon success, for example, depends less on religious doctrine than on insistent participation in the daily church affairs. Young adults go on a religious mission. On their return, they must continue to serve the church. Jewish leaders have tried to instill the same level of enthusiasm for Jewish projects and participation. And today more conservative and reform congregations hesitantly heed the Orthodox cry ''no religion without ritual.'' The hard question is whether these newer trends can counteract the powerful forces of assimilation so congenial to the free Jewish intellectual spirit.

Richard A. Epstein is a professor of law at the University of Chicago. His next book, ''Principles for a Free Society,'' will be published next year.
http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/08/10/r ... steit.html

Elliot Abrams

(1948- )

Elliot Abrams is an American lawyer and author who has served in a variety of foreign policy positions for several U.S. Presidents. He received his B.A. from Harvard College, a Masters degree in international relations from the London School of Economics, and his J.D. from Harvard Law School. During George W. Bush's first term in office, Abrams was appointed as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director on the National Security Council for Near East and North African Affairs. In Bush's second term, he was given the job of deputy national security adviser. Abrams first came to national prominence in the Reagan administration in the 1980s, where he was Assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights, and later Assistant Secretary for Inter-American Affairs.

Abrams is one of the most controversial figures in the current Bush administration. During his tenure the Reagan administration in the 1980s, Abrams regularly clashed with church groups and human rights organizations over Reagan's support for military regimes in Central America. These groups accused Abrams of playing down or covering up atrocities committed by the militaries of nations the U.S. supported, such as El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala. Abrams also has a role in the Iran-Contra Affair, where he was indicted for giving false testimony about his part in the illegal fund raising and arms selling scandal that was sanctioned by Reagan himself. Abrams plead guilty to two lesser counts of withholding information from Congress in order to avoid a probable term in prison.

Abrams is the author of several books on foreign policy and related subjects, including Undue Process,Security and Sacrifice, and the controversial Faith or Fear: How Jews Can Survive in a Christian America. In Faith or Fear, Abrams remarks "Outside the land of Israel, there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to the covenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in which they live." He says that this should not imply disloyalty to America or any other country where Jews live outside of Israel, but that Jews must be loyal to Israel because they "are in a permanent covenant with God and with the land of Israel and its people."

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jso ... brams.html

-----------

Origins and History

Scaife's philanthropic activities began in 1962, when he gave several grants to various organizations, including the American Bar Association's Fund for Public Education for "education against communism." Scaife subsequently developed funding relations with the American Enterprise Institute, the Hoover Institution, and Georgetown University's Center for Strategic and International Studies.12 In 1974, Scaife provided the seed money, along with beer magnate Joseph Coors, to help establish the Heritage Foundation, which has become one of the largest and most influential conservative think tanks in the United States.13

According to a Washington Post exposé, Scaife became disillusioned with electoral politics during the presidency of Richard Nixon, to whom he had donated some $1 million, and the Watergate scandal. The Post reports, "His experience with Nixon, according to several associates, persuaded him to invest his hopes and his money in conservative institutions and ideas, not politicians. Though he has continued to give thousands to political campaigns and political action committees, his interest in electoral politics receded."14

Although Scaife's foundations claim to not accept proposals from individuals, they provided the seed money for Elliott Abrams' 1997 book, Faith or Fear, which came out while Abrams was president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Both Abrams and Leslie Lenkowsky, then president of the Hudson Institute, approached Scaife about the project. Scaife specified that he would give the project a $175,000 grant if another "Jewish donor or group" also supported the book. The book, which dealt with American Jewry, prompted Scaife to comment to Abrams how surprised he was that this ethnic group identified more with liberals than with conservatives.15

http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/prof ... oundations

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Keep in mind... the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the blood money earned by the Jew Puppets...

Mark O'Keefe
Newhouse News Service

September 18, 2003
 
Foundation Excels at Fueling Conservative Agenda
 
Name a conservative idea -- whether it's school vouchers, faith-based initiatives or the premise that there's a worldwide clash of civilizations -- and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation is apt to have its fingerprints on it.
 

Milwukee Journal Sentinel
April 3, 2003
 
Bradley Fighting Vehicle
 
A comprehensive new report makes clear the foundation's import in the feeding and nurturing of the Neoconservative Movement that has led the US to war in the Middle East.
 
It directly ascribes the war on Iraq to the "playbook" of the neocons, a group of "mostly Republicans," "many of whom have gotten funding from Milwaukee's Bradley Foundation."
 
A Newly Enriched Foundation Hires Chairman
 
Things changed dramatically in 1985, when the Allen-Bradley Company was sold to Rockwell International, a leading defense and aerospace conglomerate, for a whopping $1.651 billion. The Foundation benefited heavily from the sale, seeing its assets shoot up overnight from less than $14 million to more than $290 million, catapulting it into the ranks of the country's largest foundations. At that point its name was changed to the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, to publicly separate it from the company. Flush with new money and an understanding that they were now poised to play a more national role, foundation trustees decided it was time to hire a professional to run the organization. They found their man in New York at the John M. Olin Foundation.

Michael S. Joyce, Bradley's the then newly minted president of the foundation, was a former high school teacher from an Irish Catholic Democratic Party family in Cleveland, Ohio. By 1972 he was voting for Richard Nixon and advancing in conservative circles. "His move to the political big time came in 1978," wrote Barbara Miner in the Spring, 1994 issue of the Milwaukee-based education newspaper Rethinking Schools, "when he went to New York to work for the Institute for Educational Affairs, a neoconservative organization started by right wing trailblazer Irving Kristol and William Simon, secretary of the treasury for Presidents Nixon and Ford. The following year Simon asked Joyce to head the Olin Foundation."

Joyce's personal viewpoint is more than traditional, emphasizing a view of family, "kinship" and community drawn from the cultures of ancient Israel and Greece. "I'm not talking about the 1950's," Joyce once told an interviewer, "I'm talking about 1950 B.C." (Milwaukee Journal, (10/30/94.) Joyce brought a more focused, sophisticated view to Bradley's funding. Under his leadership, Bradley strategically funded the authors and writers who could set the terms for national debate on key issues of public policy, the think tanks that could develop specific programs, the activist organizations that could implement those programs, and the legal offices that could defend those programs in court, as well as carry out legal offensives against other targets.

Funding Source For:

   * American Enterprise Institute
    * American Spectator Educational Foundation
    * Cato Institute
    * Center for the Study of Popular Culture
    * Family Research Council
    * Federalist Society
    * Free Congress Foundation
    * Freedom House
    * George Mason University
    * George Mason University Foundation
    * Heritage Foundation
    * Hoover Institution
    * Hudson Institute
    * Independent Women's Forum
    * Institute for Research on the Economics of Taxation
    * Institute on Religion and Democracy
    * Institute on Religion and Public Life
    * Landmark Legal Foundation
    * Madison Center for Educational Affairs
    * Manhattan Institute
    * Mountain States Legal Foundation
    * National Center for Policy Analysis
    * New Citizenship Project
    * Pacific Legal Foundation
    * Philanthropy Roundtable
    * Third Way Foundation which funds the Progressive Policy Institute
    * Reason Foundation
    * Rockford Institute
    * Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation

[Kadafi]

I wish I could   STOMP on Richard Perle's ugly face. I wish I could watch Daniel Pipes burn alive. These evil Zionist Khazars are not only supporting the killing of children in Bethlehem and throughout the mid-east, they are destroying the US economy on purpose! MARK MY WORDS AND NEXT YEAR AT THIS TIME THE ECONOMY WILL BE WORSE AND WORSE AND OUR GOVERNMENT WILL "STORE" MORE AND MORE WEAPONS IN ISRAEL. WHILE FACTORIES IN THE US ARE BEING SHUT DOWN, ISRAELI SETTLERS CONTINUE TO LIVE A LIFE OF LUXURY ON STOLEN LAND FROM BETHLEHEM TO JERUSALEM PAID FOR BY ME AND YOU AND WHEN THE US IS DESTROYED, ISRAEL WILL USE THEIR WEAPONS TO OCCUPY THE LAND BETWEEN THE NILE AND EUPHRATES. WHAT DO U THINK THE 2 STRIPES ON THEIR FLAG STAND FOR? WHY DO U THINK THEY HAVEN'T DECLARED THEIR BORDERS YET?