Advice

[jai_mann]

Okay, so at least here we're all on the same page regarding Jews. Here's my problem:

I'm attempting to get a Graduate proposal to the point that my advisor, who is also my chair head, feels that it is "okay". He's Jewish. My proposal happens to completely eliminate the arguments made by one of his favorite people to cite, who is also jewish. This other jew had advised 2 separate PhD students on this topic and in both experiments they failed to demonstrate what they were claiming and even had to acknowledge as much.

Well, along comes this goy (me), who winds up using a different approach which addresses all the problems the other individuals failed to address. On top of it, I'm clarifying the entire topic which has either been intentionally distorted, or just turned to shit through a failure of proper logical reasoning by this highly published and frequently cited jew.

This advisor has failed to maintain feedback with me such that I can make timely adjustments. I've made sure to literally record in my scheduler when I call and leave messages, but I tend to use email more frequently because it literally gives me an easy to access record (no need to request my own phone records from the phone company to prove a point to a disinterested 3rd party). I literally contacted the advisor once a week after meeting with him in the summer to check if he had reviewed the proposal. After over a month of this he finally responds and says he sent the proposal with comments to me a "looooong time ago" and to check my spam box. Clearly this was bullshit as nothing he ever sends goes to my spam box, nothing was in the spam box from him, and he could have responded to one of the many emails that I sent, once per week, to indicate that he had replied.

After several straight weeks of insomnia and adding in requested things/rewording things, I sent the revision to him. He didn't respond about it (a week after sending him the revision). I emailed him by the end of the week and called and left a message asking when it would be good to meet. On Monday, I did the same thing, and I found out his office hours for this semester, which happened to be only once a week on MONDAY. So rather than dicking around with this guy any further, I printed a hard copy and went to his office . He knows I'm cripple and that getting out and about is not a fucking trivial issue for me. Of course when I arrived I could tell by his expression that he was definitely NOT expecting me to show up. He claimed that he just wanted to do revisions on hard copies now, why he couldn't print out what I sent him is beyond me. But LUCKY FOR HIM I just happened to bring that hard copy. He had zero feed back on my methods although he said in conversation that I and one other person had questionable methods. He failed to raise the issue with my methods and I didn't push because I honestly don't think he's reading my proposal any more than superficially.

I got an email today indicating that I won't be presenting to the other students until I make things "clear" to him. Several of the issues he raised are complete bullshit as they are clearly addressed in the paper. Some of those things are literally more than 1 page in length and only some one who has not read the paper, or who is lying, would claim that those things were not addressed. He's literally asked me in one case to solve the problem with the specific example used by the 2 groups that fucked up. I used a different example explicitly because the thing they selected is extremely complicated, and isn't necessary to demonstrate the effect with the context I selected. If I was to figure that out and put it in the paper then I would be handing a solved problem over to the community to go do their own experiment with and claim credit.

Ultimately, I think that if he read my paper this time he might be delaying my ability run the experiment because what I have done would completely undermine what this other jew has done and literally change the core of the field I'm in.

I don't know if I'm completely fucked or what. I plan on going to one of my other advisors who I've held off on seeing until I felt like I had every thing laid out very clearly and in a solid manner. From what I cna tell she ain't jewish. And I wanted to see if she had feedback that was legitimate considering she isn't in this sub discipline. I had some one else mention talking with the psych omsbudman. I'm trying to avoid open conflict as much as possible because this guy is my advisor and chair and one of only 2 people in the sub discipline (both are jews, ugh). I honestly get the feeling I'm in for serious conflict at this point. I want to get the fuck out of this program as I'm done with classes and I want to move out of the area. I haven't related this to him because I think he'd use it against me.

Does any one have any feedback regarding this? Know of any online sites where student scholars can go and anonymously get their issues dealt with? I wouldn't trust any faculty members to really keep their mouths shut to the advisor. The only thing I can think of is to meet with the 1 of 3 chairs (the only non-jew btw) and get her feed back on what I've done, and then after that raise the issue to my advisor so he can't act like this other party wouldn't understand what I'm doing and saying in the paper.


ARG!

[Wimpy]

What's the general field of study jai_mann?  

Knowing that the Jew Tribe actively attempts to control and co-opt the flow of information and that you are dealing with a chair head, your options seem limited and could be expensive.  Changing Universities would be the expensive (time & Money) option and would not guarantee an advisor to your benefit.  Submitting your grievance to a hearing board  would probably result in a net negative since they will protect their own.

Reminds me of an interview with a Mathematics PhD candidate I watched a few years back (60 Minutes?).  His advisor kept him in a perpetual run around with similar vague objections and the apparent lack of interest as your's.  This Math candidate eventually killed his advisor.

The interview took place in a Prison and when asked if he had any regrets or remorse he immediately responded 'NONE, I would do it again!'

I am not suggesting this as an option but I relay this story to you knowing how far these people can push another and yet appear to be psychotically incapable of understanding the potential consequences of their behavior.

[mchawe]

I'm attempting to get a Graduate proposal

If you feel safe enough about it, please expand on what this is.

 

My proposal happens to completely eliminate the arguments made by one of his favorite people to cite, who is also jewish.

Would you mind giving us more information on the arguments and counter-arguments ?

Well, along comes this goy (me), who winds up using a different approach which addresses all the problems the other individuals failed to address.

What was your different approach ? What were the problems the other individuals failed to address ?

I can get a vague "feel" about your predicament, but I do feel that you need to give out a bit more info.....

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

My advice jai_mann is at this point to play along to get your degree... but keep any real findings for publication later.  

They do this just because they can. And they will keep you pissed off longer than a person should suffer, but when the J-tribe is running the show, it is pretty typical -- sometimes it leads to great finds just to prove them wrong.  Weirdly, physical threats from more than one person present seem to work well with these academic types.  Show up with a "friend" who can help intimidate them by merely being present nearby... at some point the "truth" is obvious to everyone but the J-Tribers  will just twist things or play dumb, or unattentive just to be a--holes about it... yapping on and on a phone call from their kid whom they will talk to in all seriousness about nothing important whatsoever....  Been there and have seen it myself.  If the J-Triber gets way too nonchalant, or conversely academically uptight, have the friend "come over" and say something like "is this the guy who is reviewing your proposal?"... and the both of you just stand their quietly and let him speak first without you two moving -- both looking at him... don't acknowledge his answer or let him feel he can "move around freely" ... use typical Mafia thug tactics...   I'd say bring a crowbar or some kind of shiny metal, but they might call for security...  good luck!  

[jai_mann]

If you feel safe enough about it, please expand on what this is.

Where's the relevancy to the issue?

Would you mind giving us more information on the arguments and counter-arguments ?

I'm not ruining my anonymity by giving out those kinds of details, nor am I willing to get scooped. Again, where's the relevancy?

What was your different approach ? What were the problems the other individuals failed to address ?

I dunno, maybe we're on two separate planets here but I'm noticing a trend in irrelevant questions... :?: In the behavioral sciences, we would use such a trend to predict future behavior in a similar context....

[
I can get a vague "feel" about your predicament, but I do feel that you need to give out a bit more info.....

Thanks for the chuckle. The details you've shown a trend in requesting are entirely irrelevant in dealing with a professor who consistently fails to provide timely feed back, even when prompted; when providing feedback gives consistent superficial responses, many of which could have been provided all at once, rather than protracted over multiple edits; and who may have familial ties with the big wig who did a very shitty job on explaining the phenomenon, which more than one of his PhD students attempted and failed to model. If the familial ties aren't there, the adulation certainly is, as demonstrated over several years of classes with him. Sorry for those details. I know they aren't what you were looking for.

[jai_mann]

My advice jai_mann is at this point to play along to get your degree... but keep any real findings for publication later.

That was the plan, but he's the one holding me back from proposing. Gotta propose then defend and he won't let me do the first step until he can "understand" what I'm doing. It's a bullshit equivocation as there are examples an elementary schooler could understand, no exaggeration.

They do this just because they can. And they will keep you pissed off longer than a person should suffer, but when the J-tribe is running the show, it is pretty typical -- sometimes it leads to great finds just to prove them wrong. Weirdly, physical threats from more than one person present seem to work well with these academic types. Show up with a "friend" who can help intimidate them by merely being present nearby... at some point the "truth" is obvious to everyone but the J-Tribers will just twist things or play dumb, or unattentive just to be a--holes about it... yapping on and on a phone call from their kid whom they will talk to in all seriousness about nothing important whatsoever.... Been there and have seen it myself. If the J-Triber gets way too nonchalant, or conversely academically uptight, have the friend "come over" and say something like "is this the guy who is reviewing your proposal?"... and the both of you just stand their quietly and let him speak first without you two moving -- both looking at him... don't acknowledge his answer or let him feel he can "move around freely" ... use typical Mafia thug tactics... I'd say bring a crowbar or some kind of shiny metal, but they might call for security... good luck!

As humorous as I find your example, I'll clearly have to find some means of motivating him to do what any honest person would have done a while ago.

Seriously, what academic tells a student, who has made the offer, DON'T pay out of pocket for the experiment. And to top that off, it isn't just an academic but a jew. If he didn't take issue with the implications of the work, he would have jumped at the chance to have me pay out of pocket for the project. One more indication he's dishonest fucker.

[mchawe]

I don't even know what your field of study is. For example if it was history and you had evidence that as per David Irving that the 1956 Hungarian Uprising was a pogfrom against Jews who were running Hungary at the time, but your Professor a Jew flatly disagreed without taking into account your evidence etc, and was blocking you for no other reason than propaganda, then I have a handle on what you are talking about. If your field of study is Physics or something else then the circumstances are different.
As far as I am concerned my questions were and are relevant, but I did realise you might not feel safe going public so to speak
So with the limited understanding of your problem, I can only go along with the advice given you by CSR. Go in with a couple of heavies, or better still grab him by the ankles and hang him out the window. Make sure you are above the second floor ! He will start to see very clearly then !

[jai_mann]

I don't even know what your field of study is. For example if it was history and you had evidence that as per David Irving that the 1956 Hungarian Uprising was a pogfrom against Jews who were running Hungary at the time, but your Professor a Jew flatly disagreed without taking into account your evidence etc, and was blocking you for no other reason than propaganda, then I have a handle on what you are talking about. If your field of study is Physics or something else then the circumstances are different.
As far as I am concerned my questions were and are relevant, but I did realise you might not feel safe going public so to speak
So with the limited understanding of your problem, I can only go along with the advice given you by CSR. Go in with a couple of heavies, or better still grab him by the ankles and hang him out the window. Make sure you are above the second floor ! He will start to see very clearly then !

The responses by the professor could have occurred entirely independent of the field. That is, I could be in physics, mathematics, history, english, engineering, psychology, finances, or so on. A failure to provide timely feedback and feedback which indicates that the material was actually read, are both study independent responses.

Propaganda, by jews, or by any other group, is not restricted to merely subject matter which concerns themselves. For instance, all of the nonsense published about Einstein and relativity has nothing to do with them in any direct manner, yet it is a diversion from the empirical work of people like Tesla.

I indicated, as quoted below, why the information you sought is not relevant.

The details you've shown a trend in requesting are entirely irrelevant in dealing with a professor who consistently fails to provide timely feed back, even when prompted; when providing feedback gives consistent superficial responses, many of which could have been provided all at once, rather than protracted over multiple edits; and who may have familial ties with the big wig who did a very shitty job on explaining the phenomenon, which more than one of his PhD students attempted and failed to model. If the familial ties aren't there, the adulation certainly is, as demonstrated over several years of classes with him.

I'll have to weigh my options at this point I guess. I certainly can't go complaining about some one who has clout.

This is the prime example that I always give to others of why modern science is nothing more than a religion. Fucking dishonest assholes plant a flag, stake their claim, and any one who threatens their claim gets shot down before they can even publish so that the community can judge the dissenting approach by merits alone.