RULES FOR RADICALS: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals.

[Helphand]

Given the deluge of admonitions from everyone from the lamestream media through Alex Shill Jones, Rense, Rivero, etc etc even (it pains me to say) to DBS and Ognir/TiU Radio that the criminals, the banksters:

-- "control everything";
-- survey "everybody";
-- are "omnipresent";
-- are "omipotent";
-- spy over social networking sites and know your innermost secrets;
-- can beam lasers through walls into your house to find metals and monitor body heat;
-- erase hard disks and plant viruses and key stroke loggers remotely;
-- surreptisiously implant control chips when you go to the dentist or via nano-chips in vaccinations;

and on and on and on..., then: it is as well to take a few leaves out of the book penned by one of Jewry's own radicals with a cause (but not that professed by him) and recall that if people feel they don't have the power to change a bad situation, then they do not think about it. If people are constantly subjected to suggestion that the oppositon is all-powerful then they become inert, disillusioned and despondent and they won't be receptive to ideas on how to contain and control the malefactors through e.g. agitating for money reform, boycotting purchase of Jewspapers and their entertainment offal and fingering individual politicians, educators, Government officials and others who have abused their position through receiving backhanders or been inducted into subversive societies like Common Purpose or Freemasonry.

  I suggest you all read this book and reflect on it, because its rules can be turned into weapons of defence. Consider especially what it has to say about effective communication and the necessity of speaking to people through shared experience -- and first making an experience for your audience if they do not have the necessary shared experience to hook your message.


RULES FOR RADICALS: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals.
Copyright (c) 1971 by Saul D. Alinsky.


Seventh Chapter: "In the Beginning."

   ...The issue that is not clear to organizers, missionaries, educators, or any outsider, is simply that if people feel they don't have the power to change a bad situation, then they do not think about it. Why start figuring out how you are going to spend a million dollars if you do not have a million dollars or are ever going to have a million dollars--unless you want to engage in fantasy?

   Once people are organized so that they have the power to make changes, then, when confronted with questions of change, they begin to think and to ask questions about how to make the changes. If the teachers in the schools are bad then what do we mean by a bad teacher? What is a good teacher? How do we get good teachers? When we say our children do not understand what the teachers are talking about and our teachers do not understand what the children are talking about, then we ask how communication can be established. _Why_ cannot teachers communicate with the children and the latter with the teachers. What are the hangups? Why don't the teachers understand what the values are in our neighborhood? How can we make them understand? All these and many other perceptive questions begin to arise. It is when people have a genuine opportunity to act and to change conditions that they begin to think their problems through--then they show their competence, raise the right questions, seek special professional counsel and look for the answers. Then you begin to realize that believing in people is not just a romantic myth. But here you see that the first requirement for communication and education is for people to _have a reason_ for knowing. It is the creation of the instrument or the circumstances of power that provides the reason and makes knowledge essential. Remember, too, that a powerless people will not be purposefully curious about life, and that they then cease being alive."



   "This country's leading hell-raiser... has set down some of the rules of the game. No one has had more experience or has been more successful at it than Alinsky."
--The Nation.

   First published in 1971, Rules for Radicals is Saul Alinsky's impassioned counsel to young radicals on how to effect constructive social change and know "the difference between being a realistic radical and being a rhetorical one." Written in the midst of radical political developments whose direction Alinksy was one of the first to question, this volume exhibits his style at its best. Like Thomas Paine before him, Alinsky was able to combine, both in his person and his writing, the intensity of political engagement with an absolute insistence on rational political discourse and adherence to the American democratic tradition.

   "Alinsky's techniques and teachings influenced generations of community and labor organizers, including the church-based group hiring a young [Barack] Obama to work on Chicago's South Side in the 1980s ... Alinsky impressed a young [Hillary] Clinton, who was growing up in Park Ridge at the time Alinsky was the director of the Industrial Areas Foundation in Chicago."
--Chicago Sun-Times

[SolusInAeternum2]

Rules for Radicals

[Panoptimist]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19154398/Rule ... PowerPoint

[Panoptimist]

Uh, who is this Marxist jew shill? All i see is globalization masonic catchphrases and ideas spread throughout...am i supposed to learn how NOT to think from this guy?...

[Helphand]

#1. know the enemy;
#2. use his methods against him.

[Panoptimist]

It's quite simple.

The answer would be, yes, simply the application of those 'radical' principles against the suppressor (i.e. Jew). But I realized something last night after I sat down and read Freemasonry & Judaism in a sitting: these wandering miscreants had nothing but time to sit around a scheme. To hold little mystical sermons in the desert and decide that they WERE NEVER NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCES betray a member of the group...they would infiltrate societies and feign integration only enough to run the money. Then they build their little closed-culture in whatever host culture they leech off of.

My point is to say this: They are the masters of (occult) secrecy and banding together. It's too late for the rest of the world. They've successfully, over the course of 250 years, rendered the rest of the world useless. Different races, nationalities, the strength of Christianity have all been dissolved.  There's not a single group of people l eft on this planet to apply those principles to snuff them out.

A simple organized (based on something tangible, significant, sincere) conscious boycott of Jewish business would effectively snuff them out of life. But they're the glue holding our shitty situation together. No one selfish middle class whitey has the nutsack to sacrifice the material worship of bullshit for longer term gained. They've killed Christian value, they've killed mental and moral strength.

Now the only thing to do is sit back and watch them fuck up. The establishment of a Zionist state will be the proof the world needs to see that Jews can't sustain themselves on a large scale. A state full of banks isn't a state at all. Jews have NEVER been able to PRODUCE anything TO SUSTAIN themselves...they've always had to leech off everyone else. How did Bolshevism operate? Let them set up their state doomed to failure. They may be able to support themselves for awhile, raping and pillaging and forcing the rest of the world "to hand in their crops," but that system won't last. Unless they manage to implant us or render us completely ineffective using advanced technological means.

[Helphand]

Glad to see you've absorbed the spirit of Mullins' New History of the Jews (1968) where he expands insightfully upon the thesis that the Yahoos cannot get down to competently administering a state once they've overrun the culture of its founders. Not just the Turco-Finn Mongoloids either, it's an ethnic habit.

[§N9sh2bj]

so this guy is another 'jew'.

re: to bluejelly's point: it's the ideology which really defines a jew.

as 'panoptimist' pointed out 'whitey' has adopted their ideology, in that he has gas for his truck, etc etc, based off of lies.
gas for your truck - fuel, energy, might be okay if it was decentralized, under this anti-federalist ideology (based on natural law, re that excellent post about fr. johnson). but it's not. Not yet...

jew:
so at the center there is a parasitic ideology. Once the tapeworm has weakened the host to such an extent, and there ARE NO MORE HOSTS who are unaware, forget-it. The tapeworm is too busy feeding off the last host, to know there aren't any more left.

i just want to make clear their ideological pursuit uses eugenics, 'race', as a convenience. A canard they pull out, along with 'genetic tests' (disguised/renamed eugenics) to prove their 'race' ideology when it suits them. Tests, they controlled. Even from WITHIN, their neo-ghetto structures are collapsing. There are so many tapeworms now, someone has to be in bed with them (with the ideology) not to see it. I AM FINE with that!

---
I'm with panoptimist especially.