The Redlegs -- To Hell or Barbados - The (Jewish) Ethnic Cleansing of Ireland

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Idiot Talmudic Jews,  like they did in parts of the Carribean,  want to make all of America their Jew'd "Redlegs" territory...  --CSR

Redlegs

Redlegs is a term used to refer to the class of poor whites that live on Barbados, St. Vincent, Grenada and a few other Caribbean islands. Their forebears came from Ireland, Scotland and the West of England.[1] Many of their ancestors were transported by Oliver Cromwell.[2] Others had originally arrived on Barbados in the early to mid 17th century as slaves or indentured servants. Small groups of Germans and Portuguese were also imported as plantation labourers. Many were described as "white slaves". According to folk etymology, the name is derived from the effects of the tropical sun on their fair-skinned legs. However, the term "Redlegs" and its variants were in use for Irish soldiers of the same sort as those later transported to Barbados, and the variant "Red-shankes" is recorded by Edmund Spenser in his dialogue on "the Present State of Ireland" as early as the 16th century.

By the 18th century, white slavery was becoming more and more uncommon, and fewer and fewer whites existed on Barbados outside of the sugar plantation. African slaves were trained in all needed trades, so there was no demand for paid white labour. The Redlegs, in turn, were unwilling to work alongside the freed slave population on the plantations. Therefore, most of the white population that chose to stay eked out, at best, a subsistence living. Because of the deplorable conditions under which the Redlegs lived, a campaign was initiated in the mid-19th century to move portions of the population to other islands which would be more economically hospitable. The relocation process succeeded, and a distinct community of Redleg descendants live in the Dorsetshire Hill district on St. Vincent as well as on the islands of Grenada and Bequia.

In addition to Redlegs the term underwent extensive progression in Barbados and the following terms were also used: "Redshanks", "Poor whites", "Poor Backra", "Backra Johnny", "Ecky-Becky", "Poor whites from below the hill", "Edey white mice" or "Beck-e Neck" (Baked-neck). Historically everything besides "poor whites" were used as derogatory insults, and the community was perceived as arrogant, alcoholic, and worthless.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redlegs
---------

The town of Bandon in County Cork was founded in the 15th century and was considered a loyalist town by the native, Gaelic Irish and one of the by-laws on the town charter, which was drawn up in 1613, was 'That no Roman Catholic be permitted to reside in the town '. Remember this was in a country where almost the entire population were Catholic. A sign was put up on the outside of the town wall which read 'A Turk, A Jew or an Atheist, May live in this town, but no Papist'.
This reminds me of a British magistrate in Ireland who declared - "The law recognises no such person to exist as an 'Irish Roman Catholic' "

In other words, it was obvious that native Irish Roman Catholics existed so the inference must then necessarily be that the Irish simply weren't "people" (compare this British State's view, which was founded on Jewish finance , to the Talmudic view of the Goyim).
This is the historical view of a commercial state that had a Jewish Prime Minister over a century ago but yet still cannot legally permit a native Catholic to hold office


http://forum.stirpes.net/modern-contemp ... eland.html

-------------


To Hell or Barbados - The Ethnic Cleansing of Ireland

We have all heard the stories and tales of woe and how Negroes were taken from their African homeland and sold into slavery by European slave traders. Over the course of a couple of hundred years, hundreds of thousands if not millions of Negroes ended up on plantations in the Americas and West Indies with no chance of seeing their home land. How do we know this? Their story is well documented and told in countless books, articles, T.V. documentaries and films, and who among us could forget the TV series 'Roots' that seemed to go on longer than slavery itself, which have been produced to make sure that the dirty Whites the 'Blue Eyed Devils' don't forget it. The Jews who have always controlled Hollywood, the print media, and in turn public opinion, are the same Jews who controlled the African and European slave trade. With the typical Jewish trait of ' Why do you persecute me so? 'they seek to blame others for their crimes and turn the black and non-white population against Whites, particularly in the USA. Do we know how many Whites were sold into slavery or transported to foreign lands? Why where they sold and forced into slavery in America, Australia and the West Indies? Why do we not hear about, or see films about the Barbary pirates and Muslim raiders who plundered the shores of Ireland, Britain and other European nations for White slaves and subjected our White European Christian ancestors and forefathers to inhuman treatment in their Islamic hell holes? Why do we not hear about White slaves and indentured servants that received worse treatment than their black counterparts in the British colonies? Just as the Jews have claimed to be as the only ones to have suffered during WWII, blacks have claimed the monopoly on being the only ones to have been forced into slavery.

During the 17th and 18th centuries over one million White slaves were captured , destined for the Arab slave markets in Morocco and Algiers. Shipping between England and America was attacked by the Arab slavers and those not slaughtered outright were enslaved .The Celtic republic of Cornwall in the south east of England was often raided by Islamic slavers, and if it wasn't bad enough that the English were shipping us off by the boat load we had to contend with Arabs as well. In the year 1631 the village of Baltimore in Cork had 107 of its inhabitants kidnapped and thrown into the holds of slave ships and transported to a living nightmare in the middle east. The rest of the villagers and those from out lying homes escaped capture when a shot was fired to raise the alarm. When held captive one of the few ways to survive, however short lived, was to convert to the wicked faith of Islam and renounce the Christian faith. Of course there are those who did but many chose to die the most horrible of deaths rather than deny Our Lord Jesus Christ. When emissaries from England arrived in the Arab nations to buy back their countrymen and other White slaves those who converted to the alien murderous barbaric Muslim faith were often over looked for release. One of the favourite forms of torture faced by the White slaves was skinning and being sawn in half starting between the legs, another was when the poor victim was strung up and had the soles of his feet beaten until he submitted to whatever his overseers wanted. Women would face the same tortures and many had molten lead poured into their private parts, of course this would lead to a violent and extremely painful death.

'There is adequate evidence citing case after case of African control of segments of the trade. Several African nations such as the Ashanti of Ghana and the Yoruba of Nigeria had economies depended solely on the trade. African peoples such as the Imbangala of Angola and the Nyamwezi of Tanzania would serve as middlemen or roving bands warring with other African nations to capture Africans for Europeans.'

'A couple of additional points to be addressed are the Arab slave trade in Africa, occurring almost 1,000 years prior to the European slave trade, and continues even today, and continental African slavery, which was part of the culture, ... The cold reality, Africans controlled the capture of other Africans, initiated several wars and raiding parties to secure captives, set prices for buyers and even extended credit to Europeans for the purchase of Africans'. African Holocaust: Dark Voyage.

The empires of Britain, France, Spain, Belgium, Portugal, Germany etc. were built on slavery and in hindsight if these countries didn't seek to expand their area of control and increase their wealth and fortunes the White race, the European race, would not be in the position it is in today. Our countries would not be over run with the non-White offspring which claim entry into Europe because they come from one of the former colonies and because most of Europe is in the control of the EU they can claim entry into other member states of the EU. Immigration into Europe, legal or otherwise, is not a problem just for the country of entry it's a problem for us all. Once one country succumbs to the non-white hordes, with their crime, drugs, disease, prostitution etc., the rest of us will follow one by one until the once mighty European race as we know it will be a thing of the past and all that will be left will be a third world multi-racial Islamic wasteland.

In the anti-white film 'Malcolm X' about the black power pimp and drug dealer of the same name, the black actor who played the said Malcolm said a line, in reference to the spot where the first pilgrims landed in America, to the effect of 'We didn't land on Plymouth rock, Plymouth rock landed on us'. What he failed to mention was that there were no Negro slaves on any of the first ships that went to the new world or that there were White slaves on board. If the conditions were harsh for the first settlers they were much, much worse for the White slaves and so-called indentured servants. Between the years 1600 - 1699 more Irish people were kidnapped and sold into slavery than Africans.

'Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were White slaves and they were America's first slaves. These Whites were slaves for life, long before Blacks ever were. This slavery was even hereditary. White children born to White slaves were enslaved too. Whites were auctioned on the block with children sold and separated from their parents and wives sold and separated from their husbands. Free black property owners strutted the streets of northern and southern American cities while White slaves were worked to death in the sugar mills of Barbados and Jamaica and the plantations of Virginia'
Michael Hoffman III

When you think that the American Civil War or the War Between The States was supposed to be to free the poor blacks, White labourers were paid little money or had no jobs, from the point of view of slavery it is interesting to note that in 1855, Frederic Law Olmsted, the landscape architect who designed New York's Central Park, was in Alabama on a pleasure trip and saw bales of cotton being thrown from a considerable height into a cargo ship's hold. The men tossing the bales somewhat recklessly into the hold were Negroes, the men in the hold were Irish. Olmsted inquired about this to a ship worker. 'Oh,' said the worker, 'the niggers are worth too much to be risked here; if the Paddies are knocked overboard or get their backs broke, nobody loses anything.' Another fact that is also forgotten is that the poor White labourer and tradesmen were more often than not in a worse off position than the Negro slaves on the tobacco and cotton plantations. There are more monuments in the southern states than in the northern states to Negroes who fought for the Confederate Army than there is for those Negroes who fought for the Union Army. Again as in many wars the world over the Rothschilds, the Jewish bankers, were advisers and financed both sides in the war that resulted in the death and misery of millions of White Americans and European immigrants. Many thousands of Irish fought and died on both sides and the Young Irelander, John Mitchel, had two sons killed and a third lost an arm in the ranks of the Confederate Army.

The town of Bandon in County Cork was founded in the 15th century and was considered a loyalist town by the native, Gaelic Irish and one of the by-laws on the town charter, which was drawn up in 1613, was 'That no Roman Catholic be permitted to reside in the town '. Remember this was in a country where almost the entire population were Catholic. A sign was put up on the outside of the town wall which read 'A Turk, A Jew or an Atheist, May live in this town, but no Papist'. One night a Jacobite wrote on the sign 'He that wrote these lines did write them well, as the same is written on the gates of hell' a very apt reply. If you changed the year from 1613 to 1969 or indeed 2006 the original sign could have been written on any wall in any loyalist town in the six counties of occupied Ulster, such was and is their support for the Jews and the bandit Jewish state of Israel then and now.

It is believed that the first Irish slaves was in 1612 on a settlement on the Amazon River. It is also known that James I had 200 land owners shipped to Virginia in 1620 because they protested in Dublin about being thrown off their own land in Wexford. There is another recorded instance of Irish people being shipped into slavery in April of 1636 when indentured servants / slaves were shipped to Virginia from Kinsale. A ships captain, Joseph West, was to set sail for Kinsale to pick up the 120 indentured slaves but was beaten to it by another slave ship owned by Dutch Jews, surprise surprise, who also signed on, kidnapped, all the available labour. West not having his slaves to trade and the up-take for voluntary workers was practically nil he employed men to 'induce' and kidnap as many as possible. His cargo was be forty one men and twenty women. The voyage to America was lashed by storms so he made for Barbados. Eight died on the way and the rest were quickly sold on arrival.

The role of the Jewish race in the enslavement of the Irish race went on until the end of slavery as it did with the Negro slave trade. Jews had already a foot hold in the sugar plantations in Barbados, which was known as the 'Sugar Island' or the 'Tobacco Islands', when the Portuguese expelled them from Brazil. Nearly all of those expelled landed on Barbados. They invested heavily in the sugar plantations and in turn pumped their ill gotten gains into the white slave trade, which was primary from the shores of Ireland. If we take a closer look at their involvement in the trade a few things slot into place, for instance King, or one could say queen, William of Orange was financed by the Jewish bankers, Oliver Cromwell allowed the Jews back into England, his army and his Civil War was financed by the Jews and both he and the devils disciples benefited financially and politically from the war and from slavery.

A study by Ira Rosenwaike and published by the American Jewish Historical Society has shown that 75% of the Jews in the Southern states of America owned black slaves while 36% of the White population owned slaves.

'The slave trade had been a Jewish monopoly for hundreds of years. The Khazar Jews of Russia had been famous for supplying White Slav slaves to Muslim and Turk rulers in the Middle East and Mediterranean. This trade expanded westward throughout the Mediterranean, until in the 15th-16th centuries the Mediterranean slave trade was a Jewish monopoly. With Portuguese colonization of the West coast of Africa, the trade in African slaves for the Americas boomed in the experienced hands of the Portuguese Sephardic Jews. They also monopolized the new sugar business in Brazil... until the Portuguese crown under the Braganza kings re-conquered Brazil and brought in the inquisition to deal with the Brazilian Jews.' Cushman Cunningham

Although the Irish race had been under the English yoke of slavery and bondage for many years the shipping of our people to a far off shore was a completely new thing. During the English Civil War, Cromwell's new model army landed on our holy shores and a reign of Talmudic terror swept the land leaving death and destruction in its wake. After the siege of Drogheda in 1649 Cromwell had the entire garrison killed, over 2000 were put to death in the most crude and vile ways. When over 100 people took refuge in the steeple of Saint Peters Church the soldiers burned all to death, the remainder of the town were shipped into slavery in Barbados. October 11th 1649 the people of Wexford received the same fate as those in Drogheda. Again over 2000 were slain and the town was sacked and the women of the town were raped by the sadistic New Model Army. Over 300 women were taken to a place known as 'The Cross', they were raped, murdered and their fingers were hacked off so rings could removed. The outrages would continue, thousands more would die at the hands of Cromwell's men, countless thousands would be displaced and driven from their ancestral lands and thousands more sold into slavery.

'The widows and orphans, the deserted wives, and the families of the swordsmen were kidnapped and transported by the slave merchants of Bristol which their previous experience enabled them to organise with advantage to themselves'. Sir William Petty 1672.

After the war between 34,000 - 40,000 Prisoners of War were to be sent to the Tobacco Islands but a deal was done and the soldiers were allowed to go into exile and join other armies that were not at war with England, it became known as the 'Flight of the Earls'. All went into service in the armies of France, Poland, Spain and Austria. In May 1652 Don Richardo White took 7,000 soldiers to Spain and Colonel Christopher Mayo took another 3,000 in September. Lord Muskerry took 5,000 with him to Poland. The soldiers were not permitted to take their families with them and Cromwell later had them sold into slavery. Of those who remained, those who were not sentenced to death, were thrown off their land and were in Cromwells now infamous words were sent to 'Hell or to Connaught'. Connaught had already been put to the sword by the men of Sir Charles Coote. He ordered his men to kill every man woman and chid that they came across. More people died en-route to Connaught than were killed in the war. Dr Perry did a survey of Ireland and his figures showed that in 1641 the population was 1,668,000 and in 1652 it was 1,100,00. One third of the population perished of those 504,000 were Irish, Perry said they were 'wasted by the sword, plague, famine and hardship'.

William of Orange said the Irish were 'Born soldiers' and Henry IV of France called Hugh O'Neil the 'Third soldier of his age' and an English officer, Sir John Norris, said 'He knew no nation where there were so few fools or cowards'.

On March 25, 1659, a petition of 72 Englishmen was received in London, claiming they were illegally 'now in slavery in the Barbados'. The petition also claimed that '7,000-8,000 Scots taken prisoner at the battle of Worcester in 1651 were sold to the English plantations in the New World, 'and that' 200 Frenchmen had been kidnapped, concealed and sold in Barbados for 900 pounds of cotton each.'

'Over 100,000 young children, who were orphans or had been taken from their Catholic parents, were sent abroad onto slavery in the West Indies, Virginia and New England, that they might thus lose their faith and all knowledge of their nationality, for in most instances even their names were changed.'
Thomas Addis Emmet. 1903.

Many thousands of Irish children some as young as eight, we must not forget about the children from England, Scotland and Wales that faced the same fate, were kidnapped and sold into slavery. One ships captain boasted that he sold over 6,000 Irish children over a twelve year period and another said he kidnapped on average 850 per year. An English girl of 16 managed to escape and identified her kidnapper, he was brought to court and received a partly fine of 12 pence.

There is '... evidence that the Alba , Scots, Irish and Picts have been the longest race held in slavery ... There were hundreds of thousands of Scots sold into slavery during Colonial America. White slavery to the American Colonies occurred as early as 1630 in Scotland '. Michael Hoffmann III

Those who were duped into signing on as indentured servants fared little better than their fellow countrymen that were slaves. Areas with high populations of poor people were the prime targets. Whole families especially from the north of England, Scotland and Wales and of course the most put upon nation in Europe, Ireland.

There are numerous accounts of the treatment of slaves on their way to and when they arrived at their final destination in the far off islands of Barbados, Guiana, Antigua, Montserrat, St. Christopher, Jamaica and Nevis among others. The conditions on the slave ships equalled those on the black slave ships and in some cases it was worse. Chained in cramped and filthy unsanitary conditions in the darkness of the ships hold and on a near starvation diet thousands died and their bodies thrown into the sea. In 1883 Colonel AB Ellis wrote that 'It appears from the best information which is at present accessible that more than one fifth of those who were shipped were flung to the sharks before the end of the voyage'.

Records show that a ship called the 'Zong', delayed by storms, with the food running low threw all of the 132 Irish slaves overboard so the crew would have enough to eat. Another ship 'The Atlas II' put into port with 65 of its 181 Irish slaves dead, still shackled. The British slave transport ship the 'Hercules' averaged a 37% death rate on its voyages.

In 'The Shaping of Black America' the author gives a graphic account of the conditions faced by our ancestors in the hell ships on their way into captivity and a living nightmare' ... they came, these Christian demi-slaves, the same way most blacks came, crammed shoulder to shoulder, toe to toe, the living and the dead side by side, in the unventilated holds of crowded ships. In this respect, as in others, there were striking similarities between the White servant trade and the black slave trade. It was not for nothing that the trade in Irish servants was called the Irish slave trade'.

On arrival they were fed to build up their strength so as to gain a better price in the slave auction. They were then graded and divided into four groups, women and girls, men and boys, children of both sexes and what was called the 'refuse' which were the old the sick and those unfit for much labour. The sale of the women and girls attracted the most attention. Put on a platform the terrified women were striped naked and examined by their potential buyers, some even brought a midwife to ensure they were buying a virgin. The primary use for these poor women and children was as sexual playthings and concubines and rape was common place, as all these women certainly didn't want to have intercourse with the vile disgusting men who had purchased them in a market like horses, except the treatment their horses received was much better. The boys didn't fare any better, they were sold at inflated prices to known homosexuals and paedophiles, their suffering and misery could only have been horrific and would be too hard to contemplate. When the boys grew too old they were sold to the local brothels to be used and abused there.

The Public Archives in Barbados contain evidence of stud farms being set up by the planters in which the likely looking 'breeders' at the slave market were bought, along with indentured women and girls, and put to work in these brothels to produce future slaves. Careful records were kept much like were kept for horses. Some young women had their first children at the age of 12 or 13 and by the time they reached their 20s they were worn out with the brutality and continuous child birth. To their credit the Irish women refused to submit to being used in this way and savagely beaten and violently whipped into submission. The planters found the Irish women 'cold and unresponsive' but on the other hand they found the mulatto women more than eager to satisfy their masters lusts. When the girls born to these unfortunate women reached the age of 12 or 13 they were sold to the madams of the local brothels, which catered for the planters, rich merchants and ships captains. Due to their lack of Christian morals the mulatto women fetched a higher price in the brothels than the White women. When they out lived their use and lost their looks the girls were sold to the lower class brothels which were run by mulatto women. The mulatto boys that resulted from the rapes in these stud farms were more often than not sold to homosexuals. The Irish male slaves didn't accept homosexuality and did not take part in the sodomy that was sometimes rampant among the planters and slaves alike, of course there might have been some exceptions to this rule. The same could be said about the Irish that were transported to Australia and New Zealand where the written records reflect this.

The White slaves we treated much worse than the Negro slaves, because the Negroes cost between 20 -50 pound sterling but the Irish in comparison cost 900Ib of cotton, which was about 5 pound sterling. The Negroes had to be purchased in Africa from the Arabs and Negro tribal elders and chiefs while the Irish and other White slaves were kidnapped without much cost to the slave traders. Also the round trip to and from Ireland was much shorter and quicker than the trip to Africa. The Negroes got better food better housing and privileged positions of authority over the unfortunate Irish. The Negro slaves were more accustomed to the heat of the tropical islands and were able to do more work than the Whites and thus received better treatment. In 1657 after a trip to Barbados Richard Ligon wrote 'I have seen an overseer beat a White servant with a cane about the head, till the blood has flowed, for a fault that is not worth the speaking of.'

In regard to treatment of White slaves in Virginia T.J. Whertenbaker wrote 'the indentured servants ... were practically slaves, being bound by the soil and forced to obey implicitly those whom they served'.

'They became in the eyes of the law a slave in both the civil and criminal codes, were classed with the Negro and the Indian. They were worked hard, were dressed in the cast off clothes of their owners, and might be flogged as often as the master and mistress thought necessary.' J.B. McMaster.

'Negroes being a property for life, the death of slaves in the prime of youth and strength is a material loss to the proprietor ... They are therefore under more comfortable circumstances than the miserable Europeans over whom the rigid exercise an inflexible severity ... Generally speaking, they, the White servants, groan beneath a worse than Egyptian bondage .'

'They are just permitted to live, and a very great part Irish, derided by the Negroes and branded with the epithet of White slaves ... I have for my particular satisfaction inspected many of their plantations, and have seen 30, sometimes 40, Christians, English, Scotch and Irish at work in the parching sun without shirt, shoe or stocking.' Colonel John Scott.

After the suppression of the Monmouth rebellion of 1686 many Englishmen were transported to the colonies of their own nation.

Thousands of Scottish Highlanders and patriots were enslaved by the English after the Highland Clearances and the Jacobite rebellions of 1715, 1745 and transported to the English colonies in America. Whole villages, crofters cottages and settlements were cleared by the English with the help of clan turncoats and lowland Scots / Ulster Scots to make way for the 'four legged highlanders', sheep. Just like the Irish our blood in Scotland were murdered and forced off their ancestral lands by the English powers that be, for profit and greed.

There were cases of white runaways, who when caught, were taken to the town square, had wooden stakes driven through their hands and their bodies burned very slowly with a torch, starting at their feet. They were then beheaded and their heads put on pikes and displayed in prominent places in the market. Another similar form of punishment was when the Irish slave was hung up by his hands and had either his hands or feet burned. These punishments were frequently inflicted on the Irish and Scottish rebels who fought against the English / British crown.

The work was beaten out of the poor wretches by the mulatto slave drivers. The mulattos were the inhuman disgusting offspring of the plantation owners and Negro women slaves. They were not afraid to use the whip, and use it they did, taking particular pleasure in beating the Whites. Men, women and children were not spared the rod, even pregnant women received this punishment. If the expectant mother was not able to keep up with the work she would be beaten regardless of her condition by the sadistic half-casts. In some cases in order to protect the unborn future slave, a hole was dug into which the woman would place her belly in an effort to prevent a miscarriage during the beating.

The mulatto drivers enjoyed whipping Whites as it gave them a sense of power and as a protest against their own White masters. White women were singled out for punishment and were whipped in the same way as the men, but the women were often stripped naked. The women were flogged and then forced to work the rest of the day in a state of undress. The mulattos would often satisfy their vile animal lust and violently raped the women and subjected them to the most degrading sexual and physical abuse knowing they would not be punished by the plantation owner.

In 1655 with only one quarter of the workable land in Jamaica being used for sugar growth and seeing the chance for more profit the planters demanded more slaves to work the land. Cromwell ordered that '... one thousand girls and as many young men should be lifted out of Ireland, and sent over, to assist in peopling the colony'.

When there were no political prisoners to fill the gap in the slave markets the English and later the British governments would transport men, women and children for the most trivial of offences as they did with the West Indies, early America and later with Australia and New Zealand. Thousands of Irish were transported to Australia after the 1798 and 1803 rebellions. Countless thousands of Australians claim these Irish POWs and political prisoners as their ancestors.

Such was the treatment of the White slaves and the Irish in particular that it prompted Colonel William Brayne to write to the authorities in 1656 urging them to import more Negro slaves for the reason that'... as the planters would have to pay much more for them, they would have an interest in preserving their lives, which was wanting in the case of the Irish ... 'he also wrote that many were worked to death and died as a result of cruel treatment. It is interesting to note that that many of the Irish slaves were more literate than many of the planters and all had superior intellect and education, such as it was at the time, than their black and mulatto drivers.

Between the years of 1641 and 1649, over 21,700 Irish slaves were sold to plantations in Barbados but there never seemed to be more than about 8,000 to 10,000 surviving at any one time. What happened to them?

Our ancestors were forced into slavery across the ocean into a living nightmare, the only way to escape that nightmare was the sweet release of death. Not only were our people treated worse than Negroes, those self same Negroes treated our people worse than the so-called White planters. The descendants of the planters would treat us the same way if we let them but we don't let them. What about the descendants of the Negro and the Mulatto drivers? What are we doing about them? The short answer is nothing! They are coming to our shores with their demands, not demands for equal treatment, but demands for treatment better than our own people get. Be under no illusions, they are getting better treatment, better housing, better benefits, better welfare, etc. etc. than our own people, the descendants of those who were enslaved, beaten, raped, tortured and murdered by an inferior race. Thousands of immigrants are flooding into our country, our neighbor-hoods, our schools, our hospitals and our jobs and if you think we won't be under the whip and feel the lash of the Negro and the Mulatto overseer again you are sadly mistaken. They are becoming our masters because our people are afraid to be branded as racist if they dare to speak out about the unacceptable numbers of foreigners that are swarming over our borders.

Due to the self-loathing that we as White people are made to feel because we were born White Europeans and enjoy all the privileges that goes along with it, we are expected to give all we earn and all of our nations wealth to non-White immigrants and asylum seekers, and don't forget the countless and forgotten about millions in aid sent to corrupt third world nations, that come to our countries with their hands out and they arrogantly cry racism when we refuse to give them more than is on offer. They are not even grateful for all that our hard earned taxes provide for them and their ungrateful offspring. It is time to say enough is enough. If they don't like what our money, special interest groups and our traitorous governments are providing for them, then let them go back to their country of origin because we neither want or need them, they only muddy the water of the White race and drag us down to their low level. To simplify it, "If they are black send them back". No other nation, black or White, would put up with the bastardisation of their country, why should we?

http://www.irish-nationalism.net/forum/ ... hp?p=84479