Obama’s SS# 042-68-4425

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

The US F.B.Eye is J-Tribe controlled and always has been since the time of Alger Hiss. A captive Jew Puppet... like most US Black mayors of bankrupt US cities... :

----------
Obama's Social Security Number Tied To An Alias Harrison J Bounel - 5/18/11
[youtube:2u23o5k4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6tvti9um6k[/youtube]2u23o5k4]

----------


Obama's SS# 042-68-4425

March 19, 2011 by randyedye


http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=275861

While out promoting my new book, "Deconstructing Obama," I have been asked a few times about Obama's mysterious Social Security number.

Not knowing enough to speak authoritatively, I chose to swim upstream through the data flood and head for the source.

Here I found a no-nonsense licensed investigator from Ohio named Susan Daniels. Widowed at 30 with seven children, Daniels went back to school and eventually emerged as a certified paralegal.

After several years working for others, Daniels got her own license as an investigator in 1995. Since then, she has specialized in litigation support for law firms. Her particular strength has been in researching assets.

By her own admission, Daniels is "good with public records." She knows her way around databases and has access to many that the public does not.

Jack Cashill's literary investigation uncovers revelations galore about Obama's alleged life narrative. Order the new book "Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Love and Letters of America's First Post-Modern President"

"I did not like the way things were going," Daniels says of the country's drift circa 2009. And so in the best spirit of citizen journalism, she began to investigate Obama on her own.

What she and fellow investigator Neil Sankey unearthed was a nugget that could have ended the career of a George Bush or a Sarah Palin: Barack Obama had been using a Social Security number issued in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979, a state in which he never lived or even visited at that time in his life.

This will not come as news to the readers of WorldNetDaily, whose thorough investigation climaxed last June when WND's veteran White House correspondent Les Kinsolving confronted Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs on the subject.

Predictably, Gibbs laughed Kinsolving off and switched the subject to the birth certificate. Kinsolving had seen this kind of laugh and switch before. In 1982, for instance, he introduced the subject of AIDS to then-press secretary Larry Speakes.

"Over a third of [the victims] have died," said Kinsolving. "It's known as 'gay plague.'"

"I don't have it. Do you?" joked Speakes to a general round of laughter. But unlike Gibbs, Speakes simply did not know any better.

As much as Daniels appreciates the work of WND and other serious investigators who have helped clarify the picture, she is distressed by the few who have clouded it.

"There have been many playing junior investigator from the start," she jokes. "I don't know if they even have their decoder rings yet."

This being the case, I asked Daniels to guide me through the data mine field and help me ascertain what we know for sure about the world's best-known Social Security number – 042-68-4425.

"All I can say," says Daniels of 042-68-4425, "is that it's phony and [Obama] has been using it, with it first appearing on his Selective Service document in 1980."

Daniels sent me a copy of the hand-written application of the individual who held the number immediately before Obama's, 042-68-4424. The applicant, Thomas Wood, died at age 19, which is why his information is available.

Wood's Social Security number was issued sometime between March and May of 1977. Obama would turn 16 in August of that year. Wood lived on Glenview Drive in Newington, Conn., the state from which all "042s" applied. Obama lived in Hawaii.

True to form, the left-leaning media set out to undermine the Social Security controversy and ridicule the investigators. Revealing, however, is the weakness of the response.

"Numbers are assigned based on the return address on the request envelope, not residency," crowed Jason Linkins in the Huffington Post as though he had said something meaningful. Linkins suggested two possible explanations, both preposterous.

One is that Obama applied for his SSN as a little boy in Indonesia for no known reason, and the application just happened to be processed in Connecticut for no known reason either.

For the second, Linkins cited the argument of Carole Glibert, in the Yahoo-related "Associated Content." Said Gilbert, presumably with a straight face, "In fact, Barack Obama's dad attended college in Connecticut and in 1977, Obama was college aged; is it beyond reason to consider that he might have checked out his father's alma mater?"

Last time I checked, Harvard was in Massachusetts. The closest town to Harvard in Connecticut is about 90 minutes away, and there is no record that Obama Sr. lived there, let alone that Obama visited his imaginary alma mater and just happened to apply for a Social Security card while visiting.

Daniels also sent me a copy of Obama's Selective Service data. Obama appears to have registered on Sept. 4, 1980, a month after his 19th birthday. The form lists the telling last four digits of his "042″ number, "4425."

This is the first use of the "042″ number that Daniels could find. She is just not sure it is legitimate. Some have credibly argued that the Selective Service information was forged and backdated once Obama became a presidential candidate.

"They were stupid to use the CT number on the [Selective Service] card," Daniels adds, "because now there is no way for [Obama] to back out of that number."

Other than the 1980 Selective Service registration, the first time Daniels could find Obama using the "042″ number was in 1986 in Chicago.

(Column continues below)
        
   

As to how Obama may have secured that number, it is possible that he turned to his radical friends for advice.

"We invented all kinds of ways to obtain false identity papers, and got busy building multiple sets of ID for each of us and for every contingency," writes Bill Ayers of his years in the Weather Underground. "We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID had a government-issued Social Security card at its heart."

For the record, Ayers appears to have commuted between his wife and children in Chicago and Columbia University in New York from 1984 to 1987. Obama left New York, where he, too, had attended Columbia University, and arrived in Chicago in 1985.

Daniels and Sankey have tracked Obama's many uses of the "042″ number in Chicago, in Massachusetts and in Washington. Others numbers appear with the "Obama" name, but Daniels cautions against attributing these numbers – with the exception of those from Obama's college days at Occidental – to the president.

From Daniels' perspective, one felonious use of a fraudulent number is enough. She believes this to be a more tangible scandal than the birth certificate and wonders when someone beyond WND will start paying attention.

View an amiable two-minute cartoon on the subject.


Jack Cashill is an Emmy-award winning independent writer and producer with a Ph.D. in American Studies from Purdue. His latest book is the blockbuster "Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Love and Letters of America's First Post-Modern President."

http://randysright.wordpress.com/2011/0 ... 2-68-4425/

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Obama's Hypocrisy: Insulting Our Intelligence
By: Joe Catron on: 25.05.2011 [01:13 ] (80 reads)
   


Barack Obama wants it both ways. Like every United States president since Bill Clinton, who partially brokered the now-defunct Oslo Accords in 1993, he aspires to act as a trusted intermediary in the 63-year old conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, while simultaneously pandering to America's massive pro-Israel lobby. These clashing goals have spurred him to propose an array of conflicting claims and positions that, aside from being fundamentally incompatible, are often simply painful to observe.

Over the course of four short days in mid-May, he managed, in three separate addresses - at the US State Department, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the White House briefing room, and at the annual policy conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the powerful flagship of the Israel lobby – to offer blatant discrepancies, of policy or omission, on nearly every aspect of the conflict. This jarring discord did nothing to bolster Washington's role in the situation and, to careful listeners, reinforced its ultimate irrelevance to any genuine resolution of it.

Obama's glaring hypocrisy was perhaps at its most obvious on questions of armed force. It takes a special brand of chutzpah to proclaim, as Obama did at both the State Department and AIPAC, that "every state has the right to self-defense," and then to propose, in the very same paragraph of both speeches, that Palestinians should settle for "a sovereign, non-militarized state." When it comes to the rights to which all states are equally entitled, it seems, some states are more equal than others.

Despite dwelling on the theme of political violence, Obama showed little interest in violence emanating from Israelis, which killed 7,342 Palestinians between September 29, 2000 and December 31, 2010, dwarfing Israeli casualties, according to a recent report by the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics. At the State Department, while offering multiple platitudes about "the moral force of non-violence" and sermonizing that "the United States opposes the use of violence and repression against the people of the region," he did not see fit to mention that Israeli troops had killed fifteen unarmed Palestinian refugees demonstrating at the country's contested borders, and wounded hundreds more, only four days before. Nor did he mention this massacre while later feting Israeli representatives at the White House or AIPAC. His speech at the latter did, however, include a formulaic demand for the "rejecting of violence" by Palestinians.

Obama caused the biggest splash, it seems, by opining that "the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps ... The Palestinian people must have the right to govern themselves, and reach their potential, in a sovereign and contiguous state." Following Netanyahu's insistence at the White House that Israel "cannot go back to the 1967 lines," Obama tempered his position at AIPAC to "account for the changes that have taken place over the last forty-four years, including the new demographic realities on the ground and the needs of both sides." Those "demographic realities," incidentally, are the illegal settlements Obama has defended at every turn, most pointedly by vetoing a United Nations Security Council resolution condemning them on February 18.

Leaving aside the word "contiguous," which the 1967 borders of the Palestinian territories are not, several obvious problems emerge. Elsewhere in his State Department address, Obama suggested that "the future of Jerusalem" should remain unresolved in the new negotiations he proposed. Surely he is not unaware that East Jerusalem falls within the 1967 borders of the West Bank? More likely, he is relying on the perceived ignorance of his American listeners, while forgetting he has any others.

Likewise, he probably hopes the public has forgotten his previous statements on the matter. The day after securing the Democratic nomination for the presidency in 2008, Obama told AIPAC, "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided." And while President Obama similarly suggested postponing deliberations on "the fate of Palestinian refugees" at the State Department, Candidate Obama blustered that "the Palestinians are gonna have to recognize that the right of return as they've understood it historically would extinguish Israel as a Jewish state, and that's not an option." Those aware of such brusque pronouncements may easily doubt the sincerity of his current garment-rending on these "wrenching and emotional issues."

Nor did Obama stop insulting his audience's intelligence there. Palestinians must "adhere ... to all existing agreements," he thundered at AIPAC. Would those be the Oslo Accords or the Wye River Memorandum, Mr. President? Surely you're aware that the first expired on May 4, 1999, while the second was never implemented by Israel? Some of us are.

But Obama saved his greatest ire for "efforts to delegitimize Israel." "Palestinians will never realize their independence by denying the right of Israel to exist," he said at the State Department. "How can one negotiate with a party that has shown itself unwilling to recognize your right to exist?" "It is very difficult for Israel to be expected to negotiate in a serious way with a party that refuses to acknowledge its right to exist," he sympathized in the White House. At AIPAC, he hardened this line. "Israel cannot be expected to negotiate with Palestinians who do not recognize its right to exist," he said after quoting himself: "Israel's existence must not be a subject for debate."

Of course he didn't mention the platform of Israel's ruling Likud party, which "flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river." Nor did he broach the positions of its fundamentalist coalition partners like Shas, who would deny not only Palestinians' right to exist in a self-determining state, but also their humanity.

http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_ ... p?id=16882

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Obama is no different than an Illegal Mexican border jumper working in the parking lot at Home Depot. Obama is fake, completely fake -- a captive Jew puppet over America. --CSR  

[youtube:ube6e9pe]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7ev1edK3j8[/youtube]ube6e9pe]


-----------------------
OBAMA'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER CHALLENGED



Posted On: July 5th, 2012

Source: http://www.wnd.com


If Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last 25 years than from his birth certificate.

Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2, she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama¡¯s name from the ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.

Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention ¡°that Barack Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.¡±

To acquire appropriate standing in court, Daniels has gone to the trouble of establishing herself as a valid write-in candidate for president. Before she is through, this 70-something mother of seven, who has been a licensed Ohio PI since 1995, may cause Obama more trouble than the Romney campaign.

Daniels started her investigation in August 2009. Given her profession, she has been able to access a variety of proprietary databases. What she learned without much trouble is that Obama has been using a Social Security Number with the prefix ¡°042¡å since 1986.

As she discovered, the ¡°042¡å number is reserved for the exclusive use of individuals who register in Connecticut. When she ran 10 sequential numbers before and after Obama¡¯s, all returned with the documentation ¡°issued 1977-1979 in CT.¡±

When Daniels ran the numbers immediately flanking Obama¡¯s, she came to the firm conviction that Obama¡¯s number was issued in March 1977 in Connecticut.

By all accounts, as Daniels thoroughly documents, Obama was then a 15-year-old living in Hawaii. There is no record of him even visiting Connecticut in or near this time frame.

To have gotten a Social Security card at this time Obama would have had to show up for a ¡°mandatory in-person interview.¡± This could not have taken place in Connecticut. Obama¡¯s sister, Maya, by contrast, uses a number appropriate for a Hawaiian resident.

Daniels checked other databases as well to validate her findings, including the Massachusetts Department of Motor Vehicles and the IRS. Yes, Obama used the 042 number to get a driver¡¯s license when at Harvard and as recently as on his 2009 income tax return.

In her research, Daniels kept coming across what she calls a ¡°marked anomaly,¡± one she had never seen before ¨C multiple birthdates listed for the same person. The 08/04/1961 and 04/08/1961 variation made sense, but the frequent appearance of the year ¡°1890¡å did not.

The ample evidence Daniels gathered led her to believe that the 042 number Obama has been using ¡°had previously been issued to another person,¡± one who lived in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979 and who was born in 1890.

This assertion can be verified. By law, the Social Security Administration will have kept on microfilm a copy of the original SS-5 application attached to a particular Social Security Number. Daniels, however, does not have access to that microfilm.

For this reason, Daniels has filed suit. ¡°Defendant Husted, through this filing,¡± she argues, ¡°has been made aware that the Democratic Candidate has been using a fraudulent Social Security Number, which would render Barack Obama ineligible under both the Ohio and U.S. Constitutions.¡±

Daniels asks the court, among other things, to issue an injunction against Obama¡¯s name appearing on ballot until it is determined that he is using a proper Social Security Number.

Given the response of courts elsewhere, it is unlikely that Daniels will find satisfaction in Geauga County or from the Republican secretary of state.

What Daniels has done, however, is establish a paper trail so indisputably legitimate that even the most squeamish of conservative media will have a hard time finding fault.

The major media, of course, will not bother to look. It is up to our Beltway brethren to step up and ask some very basic questions of the president that they, through their timidity in 2008, helped elect. The Romney campaign cannot talk about this issue without their support.

http://republicbroadcasting.org/index.p ... cleID=3887

[Amanda]

Isn't this the same thing they tried to do in Georgia recently (getting his name off the ballot)?

Though I give this woman credit for filing suit, I'm sure nothing will come of it.  These criminals control the judicial system and all other critical positions in the US.  We are a captured nation.

[Christopher Marlowe]

I'm interested to see how this will play out. CSR brought up the birth certificate issue before the 2008 election, and it was dismissed because of standing. This lady claims standing as a "write-in" candidate. I don't know how that will fly.

A lawyer might fight this by saying that her potential injury is very small because she doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of winning the election. That shouldn't matter, and the judge should allow her standing if her ability to run as a write-in is a legally recognized right.

If she does get access to the microfilm, that could cause a stir. It looks like the SS number was taken from a dead person. If the person was born in 1890, then he was in his 87 in 1977, which is not an unreasonable time to die. [The smarter way to have gotten a SS number back then would have been to find someone who was born around the same time as you, and in the same city, and who died very young.]

Copies of the microfilm could make it around the net very quickly.  I wonder if OBummer can make a fake of that and put it in the office. Or maybe just have an office fire.  Surely a startling coincidence, but that would be enough to let people continue sleeping.  

There is also the possibility that the SS microfilm could lead to other information. This could happen very quickly.  All she needs is a court order. OBummer would have to get an injunction to stop her, and to do that he would have to show that he would suffer a harm.  What would that be? That would be difficult to invent. OBummer couldn't very well claim that, if his true SS number was discovered, then he would be found out and tried for treason.  

I'm interested to see how this will play out.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

I'm interested to see how this will play out. CSR brought up the birth certificate issue before the 2008 election, and it was dismissed because of standing. This lady claims standing as a "write-in" candidate. I don't know how that will fly.

A lawyer might fight this by saying that her potential injury is very small because she doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of winning the election. That shouldn't matter, and the judge should allow her standing if her ability to run as a write-in is a legally recognized right.

If she does get access to the microfilm, that could cause a stir. It looks like the SS number was taken from a dead person. If the person was born in 1890, then he was in his 87 in 1977, which is not an unreasonable time to die. [The smarter way to have gotten a SS number back then would have been to find someone who was born around the same time as you, and in the same city, and who died very young.]

Copies of the microfilm could make it around the net very quickly.  I wonder if OBummer can make a fake of that and put it in the office. Or maybe just have an office fire.  Surely a startling coincidence, but that would be enough to let people continue sleeping.  

There is also the possibility that the SS microfilm could lead to other information. This could happen very quickly.  All she needs is a court order. OBummer would have to get an injunction to stop her, and to do that he would have to show that he would suffer a harm.  What would that be? That would be difficult to invent. OBummer couldn't very well claim that, if his true SS number was discovered, then he would be found out and tried for treason.  

I'm interested to see how this will play out.

I agree CM.  The entire "accurate records" of Obama are extremely "fishy".  Looks like he acquired fake IDs or at least "quasi-legal" IDs at the times he needed to get them.  From the beginning I've always said that if Obama wasn't a Jew-Puppet "Fake" he would just dump his records and say "here it is".  But he uses a Jew'd up .pdf instead of a simple press conference with a black and white Birth Certificate.  Everything in his administration has been "quasi-legal" and over the top.  In my book, if it smells "rip-off Jew" it is "rip-off Jew" and Obama is about as Kosher as it gets. Bush and Obama are just "Kosher Dill Puppets" IMHO - from the same bottle of sour NeoCon Jew p*ss.

[Christopher Marlowe]

p*ss?
Oh...p*ss!  I thought you meant p*ss, and I was like: p*ss?
Yes, definitely.

[LordLindsey]

The world has five (5) more days before Sheriff Arpaio does his press-conference to show the world the absolute-proof of the scam that has been pulled on the entire world, and announcing the person who committed the crime.

FIVE MORE DAYS...

Lindsey