U.S. District Court Rules Iran Behind 9/11 Attacks

[Wimpy]

Oh my gosh!  It was the Iranians!

I really didn't think they would be that stupid to use this as a rallying cry to invade Iran.  Unfortunately I know some people who will buy it. :crazy:

U.S. District Court Rules Iran Behind 9/11 Attacks


              U.S. District Court Rules Iran Behind 9/11 Attacks

  PR Newswire

  NEW YORK, December 23, 2011

NEW YORK, December 23, 2011 /PRNewswire/ --

A federal district court in Manhattan yesterday entered a historic ruling that
reveals new facts about Iran's support of al Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks.  U.S.
District Judge George B. Daniels   ?? ruled yesterday that Iran and Hezbollah
materially and directly supported al Qaeda in the September 11, 2001 attacks
and are legally responsible for damages to hundreds of family members of 9/11
victims who are plaintiffs in the case.  

Judge Daniels had announced his ruling in Havlish,   et   al.   v.   bin  
Laden,   et   al. , in open court on Thursday, December 15, 2011, following a
three-hour courtroom presentation by the families' attorneys.  Judge Daniels
entered a written Order of Judgment yesterday backed by 53 pages of detailed
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.  

Fiona Havlish, whose husband Donald perished in the World Trade Center North
Tower on 9/11 said, "This is a historic day.  For ten years we've wanted the
truth to be known about who was responsible for our losses.  Now we have that
answer."  

Ellen Saracini, the wife of United Airlines 175 pilot Victor Saracini, which
the hijackers crashed into the WTC South Tower, said after the hearing last
Thursday, "We just came from Judge Daniels' court where he ruled in favor of
holding accountable those who perpetrated the attacks of 9/11... I just smiled
up to Victor and I said we're still thinking about you ... we're there for you
... we'll always be there for you.  But today's very special."

In Havlish,   et   al.   v.   bin   La den,   et   al. , Judge Daniels held
that the Islamic Republic of Iran, its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Hosseini
Khamenei, former Iranian president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, and Iran's
agencies and instrumentalities, including, among others, the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard Corps ("IRGC"), the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence and
Security ("MOIS"), and Iran's terrorist proxy Hezbollah, all materially aided
and supported al Qaeda before and after 9/11.  

"The families have waited a very long time for this day and they have been
through a lot.  So I was greatly relieved that the families received an answer
to the question that they asked me ten years ago: they asked who was the
responsible party?  How did this happen?  Today a federal court judge has said
that a principal responsible party is the Islamic Republic of Iran," said
Thomas E. Mellon, Jr. of Doylestown, Pennsylvania, law firm of Mellon Webster
& Shelly, the lead attorney for the Havlish plaintiffs.

The evidence was developed over a seven-year international investigation by
the Havlish attorneys who pursued the 9/11 Commission's recommendation
regarding an apparent link between Iran, Hezbollah, and the 9/11 hijackers,
following the Commission's own eleventh-hour discovery of significant National
Security Agency ("NSA") intercepts: "We believe this topic requires further
investigation by the U.S. government."  9/11 Commission Report, p. 241.  The
Havlish evidence included sworn testimony and affidavits from the following:

  * Ten expert witnesses including three former 9/11 Commission staff members,
    two former CIA case officers, two investigative journalists, and an Iran
    analyst who has testified in 25 cases involving Iranian terrorism.
  * Three Iranian defectors who were operatives of MOIS and the IRGC.  Witness
    X, whose dramatic testimony was previously filed under seal, was revealed
    to be Abolghasem Mesbahi, a former MOIS operative in charge of Iran's
    espionage operations in Western Europe.  Judge Daniels found that Mesbahi
    has testified in numerous prosecutions of Iranian and Hezbollah
    terrorists, including the Mykonos case in Germany and the AMIA case in
    Argentina, and found to be highly reliable and credible.  Judge Daniels
    also credited Mesbahi's testimony that he received messages during the
    summer of 2001 from inside the Iranian government that an Iranian
    contingency plan for unconventional warfare against the U.S. called "
    Shaitan dar Atash " had been activated.  "This is compelling proof that
    Iran was deeply involved in the 9/11 conspiracy," said Tim Fleming, lead
    investigative attorney for the Havlish group.  

Included among Judge Daniels' findings in Havlish are the following:

  * Members of the 9/11 Commission staff testified that Iran aided the
    hijackers by concealing their travel through Iran to access al Qaeda
    training camps in Afghanistan.  Iranian border inspectors refrained from
    stamping the passports of 8 to 10 of the 9/11 hijackers because evidence
    of travel through Iran would have prevented the hijackers from obtaining
    visas at U.S. embassies abroad or gaining entry into the United States.
     The 9/11 Commission Report addressed these facts and called for further
    investigation.  9/11 Commission Report at pp. 240-41.
  * Expert and U.S. government evidence also confirmed that Iran facilitated
    the escape of al Qaeda leaders and members from the U.S. invasion of
    Afghanistan into Iran and provided safe haven inside Iran after 9/11.
  * Abolghasem Mesbahi testified he was part of an IRGC-MOIS task force that
    designed contingency plans for unconventional warfare against the U.S.,
    code-named " Shaitan   dar   Atash " ("Satan in Flames") which included
    crashing hijacked passenger airliners into the World Trade Center, the
    Pentagon, and the White House.  During the weeks before 9/11, Mesbahi
    received three coded messages from a source inside Iran's government
    indicating that the Shaitan   dar   Atash plan had been activated.  
  * Mesbahi also testified that in 2000 Iran used front companies to obtain a
    Boeing 757-767-777 flight simulator for training the terrorists.  Due to
    U.S. trade sanctions, Iran has never had any Boeing 757-767-777 aircraft,
    but all the airplanes hijacked on 9/11 were Boeing 757 or 767 aircraft.
  * A May 14, 2001 memorandum from inside the Iranian government demonstrating
    that Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, was aware of the impending
    attacks and instructing intelligence operatives to restrict communications
    to existing contacts with al Qaeda's Ayman al Zawahiri and Hizballah's
    Imad Mughniyah.  
  * Documents obtained from German federal prosecutors showing that 9/11
    coordinator Ramzi Binalshihb traveled to Iran in January 2001 on his way
    to Afghanistan to brief Osama bin Laden on the plot's progress.
  * Evidence from the 9/11 Commission Report that a "senior Hezbollah
    operative," which the Havlish evidence identifies as Hezbollah terrorist
    chief Imad Mughniyah, coordinated activities in Saudi Arabia and was
    present (or his associate) on flights the hijackers took to and from
    Beirut and Iran.  9/11 Commission Report at pp. 240-41.  Mughniyah, a
    longtime agent of Iran, orchestrated a string of terror operations against
    the U.S. and Israel during the 1980s and 1990s.  He was assassinated in
    Syria in February of 2008.

Attorneys emphasized that it is important to understand that Iran, Hezbollah,
and al Qaeda formed a terror alliance in the early 1990s.  The attorneys cited
their national security and intelligence experts, including Dr. Patrick
Clawson, Dr. Bruce Tefft, Clare Lopez, Kenneth Timmerman, Dr. Ronen Bergman,
Edgar Adamson, and 9/11 Commission staff members Dietrich Snell, Dr. Daniel
Byman, and Janice Kephart, as well as the published writings of Robert Baer,
to explain how the pragmatic terror leaders overcame the Sunni-Shi'a divide in
order to confront the U.S. (the "Great Satan") and Israel (the "Lesser
Satan").  Iran and Hezbollah then provided training to members of al Qaeda in,
among other things, the use of explosives to destroy large buildings.  The
Iran-Hezbollah-al Qaeda alliance led to terror strikes against the U.S. at
Khobar Towers, Saudi Arabia (1996), the simultaneous U.S. embassy bombings in
Kenya and Tanzania (1998), and the USS   Cole (2000).  Shortly after the Cole
attack, Iran was facilitating the international travel of the 9/11 hijackers.

"It was a wonderful day.  A great day where the truth was finally revealed in
a court of law with strong, strong evidence.  The judge allowed us to put on
and present all the evidence that we had filed directly or under seal and he
accepted it and made a ruling in our favor," said Dennis Pantazis, one of the
Havlish attorneys.  "Now we go on to prove damages for each one of the family
members," he added.  

The case is Fiona   Havlish,   et   al   v.   Usama   Bin   Laden,   et   al,
 03-CV-9848 (GBD), and is part of the consolidated proceeding In   Re  
Terrorist   Attacks   on   Septemb er   11,   2001, Civil Action No. 03 MDL
1570 (GBD).  

For full story information, background documents, and links to broadcast
quality footage, including soundbites from Havlish attorneys and plaintiffs,
please visit the case website at http://www.Iran911case.com .

http://www.bloomberg.com/article/2011-12-23/aYoOcZ6NT3wo.html

[mgt23]

OMG i just cant believe sometimes how thick some people are. Just when you think you've seen it all.

[Michael K.]

The case Fiona Havlish, et al v. Usama Bin Laden, et al, 03-CV-9848 (GBD), is a civil suit, not a criminal one.  

The most important difference is that a criminal trial requires certainty "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the defendant is guilty, in order to get a verdict that says so.  In a civil suit the burden of proof is only 51%, or in other words 'more likely than not'.  And a civil suit is only for establishing monetary "damages," which as often as not never get paid.  So the court had a different set of rules than the headline suggests, which is all part of the "magic".  

The average person reading such a headline would assume that criminal guilt by Iran was established, when in reality it was not at all.  For that matter, the fact that Bin Laden was on the CIA payroll for all those years would reasonably establish the same level of liability for the US as for Iran in the 9-11 attacks.  However there is a law saying that you can't sue the government so there will be no such trial.

In all, we have a show trial in absentia of another sovereign entity which can't be meaningful enforced by anybody, but still projects headlines which imply much more than they actually say.  "Sheeple's Court" for the magical effect on mass psychology, smoke and mirrors.  The whole occultist/Jew M.O. The equivalent would be an Iranian-held civil case against "Israel" in which the Zionist Entity was found legally responsible for the damages sustained by the Palestinians during the occupation of Gaza.  Pure puff, no substance.