Protocols are Prophetic: Chilling Ron Paul possible reference

[filosophia]

No. 18 "When it becomes necessary for us to strengthen the strict measures of secret defense (the most fatal poison for the prestige of authority) we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents finding expression through the co-operation of good speakers. Round these speakers will assemble all who are sympathetic to his utterances. This will give us the pretext for domiciliary prerequisitions and surveillance on the part of our servants from among the number of Goyim police."
 
Allow me to break this down, my thoughts in bold:

 When it becomes necessary for us to strengthen the strict measures of secret defense, NDAA UNCONSTITUTIONAL POWER  we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents Wars, Economic Collapse finding expression through the co-operation of good speakers Ron Paul. Round these speakers will assemble all who are sympathetic to his utterancesTruthers, Patriots, etc. This will give us the pretext for domiciliary(residential) prerequisitions and surveillance Predator Drones on the part of our servants from among the number of the GOY police NATO DHS

I wondered this for a while, but I had faith in Ron Paul, but now that he has conceded his right to be president and not even contending the voter fraud, I have to publish this for the world to see. The protocols are clear they use good speakers so that patriots and others will gather around them as a surveillance trap. We already know that Ron Paul supporters are considered     a threat through leaked police memos, this could be yet another example of the protocols power.

[filosophia]

Maybe I am reading too much into this because I am so fuming mad, but I tolerated Ron Paul for far too long. In 2008 he had a good chance, mabe not definite shot at president but if he went third party he could have made fireworks even if he lost. In 2012 he was the front runner, he did win more states than they allowed due to obvious, blatant, documented voter fraud, yet Rn Paul did noy make a peep, his campaign staff were traitors to begin with, his television ads were AWFUL compared to freemarket grass roots videos. What a hypocrite, a supposed defender of the free market yet does not use what his supporters give to him for free. How many Ron Paul fans would work 90+ hours a week for Ron Paul FOR FREE? A LOT. Yet he picks Jesse Benton as his manager. He pretends to be a messenger of truth but he can't even figure out 9/11 was an inside job and if he does know he is withholding the truth so he is dishonest. His sadistic attachment to the GOP is a diservice to hs millions of fans worldwide, and the only group that saw his coming were the anti-zionists and the folks really speaking the truth like Daryl Bradford Smith and Ognir who called Ron Paul out many years ago. Thank you. Now all the mainstream republicans who foam at the mouth when they hear Ron Paul will have to change their tune because Rand Paul is already in their bed and Ron is getting close. I can not support Ron Paul any longer. And as a dejected supporter I have to argue with one of his maxims: once people become a Ron Paul supporter, they don't stop supporting him. Well that's not true because I no longer support him as an honest truth teller. Most of the establishment attacks against him are pathetically untrue, meaning they may be intentionally making him into an idol as controlled opposition. Twice nw Ron Paul has declined the presidency. He is a CONstitutional tease.

[Anonymous]

I've know for a long time Ron Paul is a fraud, his heavy ties to the mises institute is evidence enough he is a fraud.

Unfortunately the masses are too stupid, think about yourself, don't waste your time with them, they don't deserve it. The American public deserve a 1917.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

The Protocols of Zion – Debunking the Debunker
By: Anthony Migchels (sent by Invictus) on: 08.06.2012 [03:16 ] (208 reads)

Recently Umberto Eco published 'the Prague Cemetery', an obvious attempt at discrediting the quickly growing awareness of the Protocols as a blue print for domination. But although Eco is in good form, with good historical and gastronomical detail, he's left looking silly.

The book centers around Simone Simonini, an Italian antisemitic conspirator. He is commissioned by a number of conspiring groups to write the Protocols to defame the Jews. This is the classical explanation for the Protocols, of course.

In an afterthought of the book, Eco 'debunks' the idea that the Protocols are for real with the usual worn out narrative of 'plagiarism' of Maurice Joly's 'Dialogue from Hell'. But as Henry Makow has shown, Joly plagiarized the Protocols, not the other way around.

The reason Eco is left looking silly is this: in the book literally everybody is scheming and conspiring for all sorts of causes. The French Secret Service, the Russians, Freemasons, the famous Mazzini (to whom Pike addressed a famous letter) is mentioned several times, the Vatican and the Jesuits. Even Weishaupt's Illuminati are featured. They are all vying for political power and all of them are trying to blame the Jews.

The only group that is not involved in these schemes are the Jews themselves, except for a few self hating Jews that are trying to implicate their brethren. I'm not kidding, nor am I overstating the case. This is what Eco is doing in this obvious and dimwitted attempt to do away with the Protocols.

Of course, had Eco described the Jews as conspiring like all the others, he would have made a much stronger case. Everybody is doing it, so why pick on the Jews, the innocent reader would have thought. But going about it the way he does makes the good professor look rather inadequate.

But are the Protocols for real?
Henry Makow in particular has made a very strong case that they are. But it is probably impossible to prove either case, for or against, conclusively. The Protocols are to the adversary what Scripture is to the One. Only savoring the veracity of its content leads to understanding of its source.

And the Protocols are very powerful indeed. Just like the Holy Books they remain fresh with every new read, proving a great mind produced them.

Much has already been said about them, but a little scope remains concerning the financial program. As an author focusing on the monetary aspects of the New World Order, I remain absolutely perplexed by the profundity of Protocol 20, regarding their 'Financial program'. Every advanced student of money should have a closer look at them.

Considering the absolutely shallow appreciation of monetary matters in the public mind, as witnessed by both Mainstream Economics and Austrian Economics, it is quite clear that a real insider must have written this text. It discusses all the main issues with money with great authority and knowledge. A detailed analysis of this Protocol can be found here.

It explains how destructive interest is, both in terms of cost to the borrower and because it hinders circulation of money, which is very important and little understood.

It mentions Gold as being 'the ruin of the Goyim States'. It explains how the scarcity of Gold hinders full economic activity, while adding 'they' have taken as much Gold out of circulation as possible. Thereby openly admitting both their domination of Gold and the specie's inadequacy as a means of exchange. And thus validating our extensive criticism of Austrian Economics.

It also cogently discusses the issue of the volume of money and how it should be managed. It provides a powerful appreciation of how things should be, including an interest free money supply and a workable unit of account. They suggest a working man's hourly wage, which, incidentally is the unit of account that LETS circles use all over the world.

In short: Protocol 20 offers a unique insight into all the essentials of monetary theory and practice. It does so in just a few pages, proving great mastery of the issues.

To my mind it is absolutely impossible that some outsider could have written this. I know of nobody that could have created such a text. There is nobody in the Alternative Media, let alone in normal academic circles that could have come up with this. The fact that this was written more than a hundred years ago makes it even more incredible, although it must be said that political and economic awareness was probably higher back then than it is today.

Conclusion
Umberto Eco did nothing to dispel the Protocols as a very important text. Worse, he damaged his reputation in the way he went at them: showing that literally everybody is busy trying to take over the world with conspiracies....except the Jews.

Meanwhile, the Protocols just sit there as a timeless witness of the truth: there are a few men out there who know. And who use their knowledge to rule over us all.

h ttp://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/

[filosophia]

Mathematical proof the Protocols are authentic, "Dialogue in Hell" plagiarized Protocols:

99% of the protocols do not appear in "Dialogue in Hell". Only 1% appears in "Dialogue". So this means "Dialogue" took from Protocols, not vice versa.

Analogy: If a student turns in a paper to a professor where 1% came from a known work, the professor does not say the known work plagiarized the student's paper.

The protocols admit their plan is hundreds of years old, so it predates "Dialogue". Also the protocols admit in the financial program that the current high taxation was for the purpose of sowing rebellion. This could be a reference to the French revolution. So if it was first composed during this time, it would make sense that the "Dialogue" also written during the French Revolution, plagiarized the protocols. Although the protocols were published in early 1900's is there maybe a chance it was written during the French revolution?

[Anonymous]

:x Yes, Ron Paul refused to apologize about voting to declare war on poor Afghanistan or for all the horrors that followed because of the lies 'issued' by the 911 Commission.  However,  I do not wish revenge,  hell and brimstone on this the United States of Israhell' even though the Amerikan people cannot be counted on to stand up to their  :twisted: masters, because we must protect our children.

Ron's loyalty is to the Republican party and to the ambitions of his family.  Jesse Benton, lead staff person being paid exorbitant amounts, is his grandson-in-law.  Certainly his voting record in Congress beats everyone else's by a landslide, except for Kucinich, but what good has that done the country!  Has any legislation he ever proposed gone through?  I am done with him also.

[Anonymous]

The Jews have always claimed that the "Protocols" are a forgery.
But everybody with even half a brain knows that Jews lie about
everything!
I will personally give 1 million dollars to anybody who can give
me a rational explanation as to HOW somebody can FORGE
the future. Somebody ELSES future!  And make it all come true!
Of course the "Protocols" are true. The Jews themselves wrote
them in 1897. In Basle, Switzerland.