British Complicity in the Persian Holocaust

[geraldo]

British complicity in the Iranian (Persian)  Holocaust:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWc8-P29 ... e=youtu.be

The greatest calamity of WWI was the little publicised Iranian holocaust, in which the British were complicit (what's new?)
It was often deliberate British policy to commit genocide by mass starvation to keep populations under control. It's ironic that there are other holocausts kept from public knowledge (see "The Holocaust Hoax Revealed" by Victor Thorn) but the most infamous of all never happened (the Jewish lies about it continue more than ever to this day!)  

From 1917-1919, the occupying British forces in Persia commandeered all transportation and malevolently prevented imports, including all food, from Iraq (Mesopotamia), India and the US. As a result nearly half the Persian population starved to death, but almost no one knows about it. This is documented in a book "The great Famine and Genocide in Persia 1917-1919" by Mohammed Ghou Majd and a British officer named Donohoe's memoirs, as well as US diplomatic reports.

The British have been guilty of many famines, including:
(1)The Anglo-Boer war where mass starvation of Boer women and children occurred in the concentration camps that they invented at this time;
(2) India (4 million died) caused by diversion of shipping normally used to bring food to Bengal, and the shipping instead was used to bring military supplies to the British in North Africa in 1942. (Something similar happened in China during the Opium Wars);
(3) Ireland 1845-1852--1 million died and another 1 million emigrated;
(4) Persia-- Nearly half the  population was wiped out; This is proven in census figures done every 10 years. This famine was exasperated/contributed to by British policies in WWI occupation, started following Russian occupation during the Russian Revolution in late 1917 and the British occupied the entire country in early 1918. People were eating tree roots, dead dogs and even cannabilism occurred with cholera and typhus complicating everything; Recovery occurred with a good crop in 1919.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Don't forget this one either. I read the book, it is pretty gripping:
----------

While this book will not have the impact of Davis's City of Quartz--a scathing indictment of L.A.'s environmental ravagement, economic disparity and racial divides--in a perfect world, it would. Its subject is nothing less than the creation of what we now call "The Third World," through a complex series of seemingly disparate natural and market-related events beginning in the 1870s. Davis dives into the data and journalism of the period with a vengeance, showing that the seemingly unprecedented droughts across northern Africa, India and China in the 1870s and 1890s are consistent with what we now know to be El Ni¤o's effects, and that it was political and market forces (which are never impersonal, Davis insists), and not a lack of potential stores and transportation, that kept grain from the more than 50 million people who starved to death. Chapters brilliantly reconstruct the political, economic, ecological and racial climate of the time, as well as the horrific deaths by hunger and thirst that besieged the peasantries of the afflicted c0untries. As in City of Quartz, Ecology of Fear and Magical Urbanism, Davis's synthetic powers, rendering mountains of data into an accessible and cogent form, are matched by his acid castigations of the murders and moral failings that have attended the advance of capitalism, and by cogent detours into the work of journalists and theorists who have come before him, decrying injustice and rallying the opposition. (Feb.)Forecast: Although this book's historical subject seems vastly removed from contemporary American life, it may get some media attention for its El Ni¤o-based arguments. City of Quartz still guarantees review attention for any Davis project, which may draw history buffs who haven't heard of him. His substantial core readership will seek out the book either way, and the book's synthesis of hardcore data will also hold appeal for poli-sci syllabi and university libraries.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, In

http://www.amazon.com/Late-Victorian-Ho ... 1859843824

[Amanda]

Wow, Geraldo! Thanks for posting this! I've never heard of this before. I'd say it's unbelievable, but it's not. We are apparently only allowed to know about fake holocausts (and we must hear about those 24/7).  But something real, that resulted in the deaths of between 9-11 million Persians is apparently not worthy of attention. Again, great find!

And, for those interested, here's a link to his book:


The Great Famine and Genocide in Persia, 1917-1919

http://www.amazon.com/Great-Famine-Geno ... 0761826335

(first review of the book is very informative)

I emailed Deanna Spingola this info and suggested that she have this guy on as a guest

[geraldo]

Amanda: It would a splendid idea to have Deanna interview the author "straight from the horse's mouth" as it were. This is important because of the propaganda and false-flags of the Talmudic  ME state 24/7 --same M.O. as in Iraq--and to defuse the victim myth of the Jews. The fact that Iran has never attacked another nation other than in self defense for over 300 years as compared to daily massacres, orchard burnings etc  by the terrorist apartheid regime could be a subject of discussion as well. More photographs from his book could be shown, and the British/Talmudic coverup discussed in great detail. Mention could be made of the pattern of disinformation by the Talmudic BBC could be thrown in (specifically collapse of WTC7 while it stood intact behind the journalist) and Reuters (the fake Libya poster of 200 young men who had died long before the NATO attack on Libya, --all to show IRAN is the real victim.And the fact that Iran treats its Jewish minority with the utmost respect, none of whom have ever expressed a desire to go to the US or Israel.

[ada]

Holocausts: Theirs and the Many Ours
http://mwcnews.net/focus/editorial/1855 ... austs.html

The Jewish Genocide of Ukranian Christians
http://www.davidduke.com/?p=34917

The Encyclopedia of Jewish Genocides
http://jewishracism.blogspot.de/2012/06 ... _9092.html

The Armenian Holocaust Of 1915
http://blockyourid.com/~gbpprorg/judici ... nocide.htm

The History of Jewish Human Sacrifice
http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/jewish_sacrifice.htm

Dresden - A True Holocaust And Act Of Heinous Terrorism
http://truthseeker-archive.blogspot.de/ ... ct-of.html

Suppressed Colossal War Crime & Tragedy -
Soviets murder 3.5 million German POWs & half a million ethnic German civilians in Gulags circa WW2
http://truthseeker-archive.blogspot.de/ ... agedy.html

Communist Genocide in Soviet Union - Jewish Bolsheviks Murder 60+ Million in Russia & Ukraine, 1917-1987
http://truthseeker-archive.blogspot.de/ ... union.html

THE PHYSICAL AND  CULTURAL DESTRUCTION OF GERMANY
http://www.exulanten.com/hell.html

The white Holocaust
http://www.israelect.com/reference/Will ... ocaust.htm

The historic growth rate of the Christian population of 1.5% per year means that the 682,400,000 Christians in the world in 1933 would have been 853,158,362 by 1948.  Instead, mostly due to W.W.II, the actual population was 592,406,542,  a loss of 260,751,820 Christians.  Even at a more conservative growth  rate of Christians of 1% per year, there were 199,838,673 fewer  Christians in 1948 than there would have been without W.W.II.


261 MILLION DEAD CHRISTIANS IN EUROPE AND RUSSIA

W.W.II reduced the total population of all of Europe by more than 25% or  150 million, from 542 million in 1940 to 392 million in 1950.  If the  Jewish population in Europe alone had decreased by a similar 25%, or 2.5  million jews, there would have been only 12.8 million Jews worldwide in  1946.  If the 1946 almanac is correct, then there were 3 million more  Jews than that in 1946 and even more in 1950.  This would mean that the  Jewish population increased at the same time that the European and  Christian populations were decimated.  And that suggests that the Nazis  did a better job of protecting Jews than of protecting Christians, or,  conversely, that it was Christians and not jews who the Nazis  persecuted.  There were undoubtedly Jews who were treated unfairly  during W.W.II, because war is that way.  But if this data doesn't  suggest that Nazis treated Jews much more fairly than they treated  Christians and other Europeans, it definitely proves that Jews died at a  much lower rate than Christians.  





This image has been resized. Click this bar to view the full image. The original image is sized 835x658.

[ada]

John Horgan (Stevens Center for Science Writings, Cross-check) and
Madhusree Mukerjee (Churchill's Secret War, madhusree.com)
http://bloggingheads.tv/videos/2734?in=08:56&out=19:39