Dunblane and Sandy Hook: Pedophile Mind Control?

[Michael K.]

As the heart-rending details of the Sandy Hook shooting emerge, the foremost question which remains unanswered is the motive behind the crime. It would appear that the official explanation tendered by the mainstream media is that a mentally unstable person was seduced by the morally corrupting power of black self-loading firearms, and then naturally stole and used them to commit a random, pointless and heinous crime.  Apparently, the investigation into the motive needs to go no further, since there is no time to delay in taking action against the black, self-loading firearms which caused this crime to happen with their evil charisma.  Don't you agree?  Or are you one of "those people..." ?

From J-pedia:

The Dunblane school massacre occurred at Dunblane Primary School in the Scottish town of Dunblane on 13 March 1996. The gunman, 43-year-old Thomas Hamilton (b. 10 May 1952), entered the school armed with four handguns, shooting and killing sixteen children and one adult before committing suicide. Along with the 1987 Hungerford massacre and the 2010 Cumbria shootings, it remains one of the deadliest criminal acts involving firearms in the history of the United Kingdom.

Public debate subsequent to these events centred on gun-control laws, including public petitions calling for a ban on private ownership of handguns and an official enquiry, the Cullen Report. In response to this debate, the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997 and the Firearms (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1997 were enacted, which effectively made private ownership of handguns illegal in the United Kingdom.

The obvious parallels between the massacres at Dublane and Newtown are receiving much air play from the anti-gun media, the following all being typical examples:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... blane.html
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/17/world/eur ... index.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 20462.html

Although the conclusions about what to do legislatively are being drawn boldly and with great moral fervor, one of the foremost parallels between the atrocities at Dublane and Newtown is that nobody seems to be able to draw a firm conclusion as to the motive behind the crimes.  People are left to speculate as to why crazy people do what they do, and to draw the conclusion that guns are ultimately the only factor that matters in such incidents, the other questions being philosophical rather than forensic.   Such analysis ignores the testimony of credible witnesses that may lead to the crimes themselves being solved.  The years following the Dunblane massacre have seen the emergence of evidence suggesting that the killings were deliberately planned and executed to dispose of the victims/witnesses of a pedophile network operating at the highest levels of power.

The following material has disappeared from my Google search engine over the last day-and-a- half. Why?  Note that the evidence presented is not from an anonymous source, but from a credible and documented one:

http://www.perceptions.couk.com/dunbla33.txt


 `Perceptions' note: email below is from a long-time (intermittent) contributor.
 However, subject matter - a mass killing of school-children by a pedophile reputed
 to have had friends in power - might offend some.

---

 Subject: VOMIT Burns
 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:01:55 EST
 From: http://www.perceptions.couk.com/dunbla33.txt

Note: The Lord Cullen who is named as a member of the Speculative Society is the same Lord Cullen behind the Cullen Report, that led to the ban on handguns in the UK.
Several parallels between the incidents, which may indicate the behind the scenes activity of a powerful pedophile network using MK-Ultra style mind control techniques, are enumerated below:


1.)   THE AGES OF THE CHILDREN:  In both cases the victims were 5 to 6 years of age.

2.)   THE MANNER OF THE EXECUTION:   In both cases, certain children killed were apparently 'hunted' according to some criteria known to the shooter, many being shot twice as in an execution, while others were left alone.  This is not a random pattern.

3.)   THE SHOOTERS WERE ALLEGED PEDOPHILES OR HAD A PEDO- PROFILE:

      A.   (Cullen Report 1996, Chapter 4, paras. 12-15): "There were complaints to police regarding Hamilton's behaviour towards the young boys who attended the youth clubs he directed. Complaints had been made of him having taken photographs of semi-naked boys without parental consent."  

      B.    ( http://news.softpedia.com/news/Adam-Lan ... 5862.shtml):  "It is believed Lanza may have posted a warning on the 4chan website a few days before, anonymously."  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4chan):  "4chan users have been responsible for the formation or popularization of Internet memes such as... Pedobear and many others."


Although it is difficult to ascertain the truth with any certainty where "dead men tell no tales", it is at least apparent that there is at least one credible motive for these crimes not being discussed in the media, namely a coverup of pedophile activities perpetrated by groups at the highest level of governmental and legal power.  Whether this is further linked to efforts by those same individuals to gain even greater political power by disarming the law-abiding majority is also a valid speculation.


MY PERSONAL HUNCH:  "The alleged perpetrator Adam Lanza appeared in pictures as a disturbed youth.  He exhibited the "thousand-yard stare" seen among atrocity-shocked veterans.  He was also autistic, according to medical records.  Lets hypothesize the existence of a pedophile ring centered in New York City, which draws its subjects from a middle class school in a predominantly Catholic and Jewish neighborhood using blackmailed pedo- priests and rabbis as handlers.  Let's say that Adam Lanza and his weird friends are co-victims, but are getting too old for pedo-use and are feeling intense let-down, hatred and guilt, less than nothing.  The handler might suggest that he would be forgiven if he "freed" the current crop of victims from becoming like him.   Then, the handler might supply some back up in the form of second and third shooters who are hit-men with AR rifles.  Not that any of that could ever be true.  Just sayin'..."

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

I smell MK Ultra all over this. Lanza could have been a Monarch Butterfly handler.

[Michael K.]

http://neilallen76.wordpress.com/2012/1 ... -a-theory/

Why Adam Lanza massacred children at Sandy Hook, Newtown – A theory & motive

To save people time, I will give a 1 minute summary followed by details with verifiable online pointers to facts.

Note that this is just a theory about a motive, and will be shocking to everyone.

SUMMARY OF THEORY:

    Adam Lanza was raped by a known, convicted Catholic pedophile priest named Fr John J Castaldo when Adam Lanza was 6 years old, when his family moved to Newtown, CT, in 1998.

    He never stopped thinking about the traumatic moment of being raped by "Christ on earth", which is what priests call themselves.  He spent every moment of his life trying to rationalize it.  He never developed normally.

    Then he went to that specific classroom because there were mostly 6 year old Catholic children in that room.

    No one protected Adam, Adam would show the Catholics that their children couldn't be protected

DETAILS & ONLINE PROOF OF THEORY:

    The Lanzas moved to Newtown in 1998.  See last paragraph at http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/for ... story.html

    A known, convicted, serial pedophile priest named Fr John J Castaldo resided there from 1998 until 2001

        Fr Castaldo's arrest for pedophilia by law enforcement in a sting operation http://www.bishop-accountability.org/ne ... aldo_4.htm

            He got one week in jail.  Search for Castaldo in the article at http://www.newstimes.com/news/article/A ... 306249.php

        Castaldo was accused of  attacking a boy under "extreme threat and intimidation", had been was expelled from his seminary for "remarkable bizarre behavior" http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Dioc ... 823058.php

        Article in the Harford Courant gives more details.  He was an especially frightening pedophile. http://articles.courant.com/2010-03-04/ ... drug-abuse

        One of many lawsuits against Castaldo http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/crime/ct-m ... NFfPW80V8E

        More with pointers at http://www.bishopaccountability.org/ass ... John_J.htm

    The Lanza's were Catholic, and went to Fr Castaldo's church http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/h ... FztFpWNEkN

    Now the speculation:

        Adam is a quiet 6 year old who moves to Newtown in 1998.    Fr Castaldo was a serial child rapist, and pedophile priests have as much sex as they can get away with.   Most victims never came forward (like Adam) because they knew they wouldn't be believed.

        Castaldo probably had many victims, most of which never came forward

        Adam may or may not have had autism, making him easy prey.  Adam would never tell anyone, and could be manipulated easily.

        Castaldo has sex with Adam, and the Catholic church hides and reassigns Castaldo, as they have done thousands of times in the United States

        Psychological trauma:

            It is tough for anyone to grasp the psychological trauma that a child experiences when they are raped by a Catholic priest.

            <trigger alert>

            They think they are being anally stabbed to death by "Christ on earth", because that is what Catholic priests call themselves.   The pain is excruciating.  They think Christ is trying to kill them, and God won't help.  They feel grunting, and groaning, and violent movement.

            Then the pedophile priest typically tells them it is their fault, and that they will get in trouble if they tell anyone, and that no one would believe them.  They believe they are going to hell, and don't know why.

            They have more psychological pressure than anyone could endure, let alone an undeveloped 7 year old.

            The pedophile priest goes to Catholic confession, is forgiven, and forgets about it.

            Adam thinks about that moment every moment of every day.  For years, he thinks he is the only child in the world raped by Christ on earth.  He has nightmares that never stop.

            His first goal is to make sure that no one ever knows what happened to him.  His biggest fear is that he is caught, and will be eternally bullied for being punished/raped/stabbed by "Christ on earth".

            Catholic child rape, and pedophile priest protection, is the ultimate psychological bullying.

            He can't even talk to other children.  He never develops socially.

            As he grows older, he sees the world differently than everyone else.  He has no help or guidance.  Everyone calls him "odd", affirming his belief that there is something wrong with him.  He knows.  He may think he was raped by Christ because he was bad, at age 6, or he was odd.  He can't figure out what he did wrong.  The psycological games would destroy any human mind.  Especially a 6, 7, 8 year old.  And it gets worse every year.  And he can't talk to anyone about it, so he doesn't talk to anyone at all.  He lives life in a complete bubble.  Even Mom and the psycologists don't have any idea.

            He has nightmares every single night, and can't stop them.

            When he matures, and finds out that the Catholic church knows about his, and no one cares, and Castaldo and other priests get no penalty, he sees a world of evil.

                Many victims of Catholic pedophile priest rape commit suicide.  In Australia, 40 suicides have been traced back to just 5 pedophile priests who abused priests between 1960 and the late 1980s, and Catholics STILL don't care enough to do anything about it http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/churc ... 1wwox.html

                Adam Lanza would know, through his internet research, that the Catholic church paid $11 million in Philadelphia to protect Msgr Lynn, who admitted to shredding evidence about 35 known pedophile priests in 1994.  Msgr Lynn shredded this information at the request of Cardinal Bevilacqua and with the knowledge of 2 bishops, Cullen & Cistone.

            Mostly, in Adam Lanza's bubble, he knows that the Catholic church fights to protect known child rapists and fights to humiliate the victims.  There is no good in this world that Adam sees.  In a world where Catholics say this is God's best church, Adam sees nothing but evil.  He did something wrong when he was 6, and doesn't know what it is.  He has always thought he was going to hell.

            He will commit suicide, but before he does, he will take revenge against the 6 year olds, most of which were Catholic.  Catholics never protected or helped Adam at any point since he was 6, and he would show that their children couldn't be protected.

        I could go on for hours, but you get the idea.  An evil brain has been created, and has been cooking for 14 years.
    Like most Catholic priest rape victims, Adam never tells anyone.

        Adam exhibited many of  the traits of children of Catholic priest child rape, which are unique, because they think they were raped by "Christ on earth", which is what priests call themselves.  Adam:

            Had no real friends
            Couldn't relate to people
            Never told anyone what happened to him
            Could never be touched or hugged, according to his mother in http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/moth ... 3KnO6JnlrI

                This is very common among Catholic priest rape victims

                Also, the barber said he never talked, and his mom did all his talking (because being touched was so traumatic).  Worse yet, the barber shop was right across the street from the Catholic church, which may be where Adam was raped  http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/18/us/connec ... index.html

    Adam goes to the school with a plan:

        Kill the psychologist that didn't help him when he was young

        Kill anyone who gets in his way

        Kill the 6 year old children, most of which were Catholics.  If Catholics didn't protect him, he would see that those 6 year olds weren't protected

            In his world (his isolationist bubble), he can now control whether 6 year old children are protected

            The viciousness has been developed for years, and the hatred is unlimited

            An insane mind has been created

        He shoots himself as soon as the police showed up.  He can never be touched.

    After the massacre, the local Catholic church, St Rose, was threatened, probably by another of Castaldo's victims who never came forward

        http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/12/16/wo ... mb-threat/

        The other victim sees that Catholic support their priests regardless of their rampant child rape, going to the church to listen to them

There's the theory, and is a more complete explanation than anything else I've seen.  If they investigate with this in mind, they will find internet sites he visited about Catholics protecting pedophile priests.  Even if his computer was destroyed, his internet provider will have a log of all the sites he visited.

Lastly, why did his brain snap that day?  My guess is that it was the anniversary of the date he was raped, a date he fears every year, when the weather, daylight, and pre-Christmas celebration by everyone remind him in ways he can't forget.

Alternatively, it could have been because his mother said she was going to put him in an institution.  However, the bigger issue for him would have been that he couldn't handle being touched.

This is a complete motive with an explanation for everything.  Let's see what other evidence comes up.

[Michael K.]

http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2012/12/a ... rings.html

[youtube:3sjstxry]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=de3lmAD5kXo[/youtube]3sjstxry]


http://rense.com/general95/mkultra.html

12-20-12
MK-ULTRA Links To
The Sandy Hook Assault
By Yoichi Shimatsu


 My long-distance interest in the Sandy Hook events is based on ongoing work with a team of anti-pedophile journalists and activists who for over a decade have tracked and exposed American pedophile rings from Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam) to Beijing, China.
 
In all cases so far, our team discovered that these frontline pedophiles supply children for sexual services to VIPs traveling in Asia, including diplomats from the highest levels of the White House and State Department, top executives of major corporations, and heads of universities and aid agencies. Nearly all the patrons involved in this cruel pastime have backgrounds in US intelligence ­ the CIA, NSA or State Department intelligence. The individuals are from diverse religious backgrounds ­ Catholic, Jewish and Orthodox - while the core facilitators are often priests with Jesuit order, and to a lesser degree Franciscans and Benedictines.
 
At an orphanage in Cambodia, it took three years for our multinational team ­ against death threats from armed policemen and undisguised hostility from NGOs ­ to realize the expulsion of a pedophile coven, which included a former US ambassador to the United Nations, the celebrated head of a new media program at an Ivy League campus and a renowned correspondent based at the Tokyo American Club. When the police shut down their strong-encryption computer center and satellite uplink, used for sweetheart messaging and exporting child-porn videos, the American pedophiles stripped out all the programs, rendering a room of Apple computers inoperable. Later, at a celebration for the "liberation" of the orphans from the grip of these abusive men and their compliant wives, the teachers told me that the average age of the boys and girls who had been invited to sleep over at weekend parties was "10 years old."
 
One member of our team who resided in Cambodia suffered an "accident" in a cowardly act of retaliation by that viscous coven ­ with all the fingers on both hands broken and bleeding from his ears as he lay unconscious along a highway. It's taken our brave friend three years to regain his formidable intellectual powers as a former political speechwriter. I use the term "coven" because these predators work as families ­ parents, children and grandchildren ­ indoctrinated from infancy that inflicting trauma on helpless children is life's greatest pleasure.
 
Pedophilia is a psychiatric illness that is spreading worldwide because the globalist elite, much like a deranged fraternity from hazing hell, use it to control their peers and underlings through the commission of shameful and often lethal crimes. The photos are enough to prevent defection, informing to the police or sending leaks to the media.
 
The American power elite's predilection for young boys has always been a privilege as shown in past scandals involving White House pages. One of the first postwar American ambassadors to Tokyo was a voracious pursuer of teenage boys inside gay bath houses frequented by rightwing Japanese militarists, the very same war criminals who had committed unspeakable atrocities against civilians ­ for example converting Christian boys schools into male brothels. The shared lust of the former soldiers from both sides corrupted and ultimately reversed the attempt by a victorious Allied Supreme Command to transform Japan into a peaceful democracy. Authoritarian perversion remains in command.
 
In recent years with the rise of Internet file-sharing, a major shift in pedophile profiles has appeared in the increasingly lower age of pedophiles. It is shocking that college-age men, who should be involved in same-age affairs (with either sex ­ we are not being judgmental about preference) are instead eager to abduct kids who are barely out of infancy and videotape brutal rape scenes to share with their online fellows. Today, young men of college age serve as procurers, pimps and producers of child porn for their sugar daddies.
 
These younger pedophiles, at least while in Asia, are often studying abroad on US government fellowships, CIA grants or working for Soros-funded NGOs. In Beijing, I had a verbal sparring match with a young American video producer who was making a documentary on child abductions by Chinese adoption rings. He had no intention of saving kids from these criminals, since his stated ambition was to launch a pornography industry in China. This was the son of a leading faculty member at a Connecticut prep school, which sponsors troubled boys and prepares them for a life of male prostitution with dormitory screenings of videos showing the gang rape of preteen girls ­ with the knowledge and sometimes approval of teachers, according to testimony submitted to court.
 
After first being a victim of sexual assault and then acting as a perpetrator against younger boys or girls, many of these young men develop passive-aggressive personalities. When challenged, they tend react with suppressed rage under a blank expression and then get their revenge with a strange prank against their accusers.
 
Many women might nod in agreement that men are awful creatures, but from our experience in Southeast Asia, there are also many female predators. On an early-morning visit to a Peace Corps camp on the Laotian border, a friend in the U.S. Army was stunned to discover that every American women ­ all graduates of elite East Coast colleges ­ was asleep with a 12-to-14 girl tucked inside her bed. Americans are not alone in this sickness of mind and body ­ Europeans, Australians and Japanese are among the notorious child molesters. Sexual domination of weaker individuals, especially children who cannot defend their rights, is a hallmark of imperialism.
 
There is one more element involved in the pedophile industry: the organized crime groups that finance the purchase or kidnapping of children. These gangsters are not just low-life elements but also include professional gangsters - "businessmen" with connections to politicians and bankers.
 
A point that needs mentioning is that during youth, I spent a summer at a prep school in Connecticut on a National Science Foundation program ­ but it had nothing to do with MK-ULTRA.
 
Mind Control in Connecticut: Catcher in the Rye
 
In 1942, at the start of World War II, the Jesuit order opened Fairfield University in southern Connecticut. The new Catholic college was erected on the country estate of Brewster Jennings, then chairman of the Socony Mobil Oil Company, which after a series of mergers became ExxonMobil. After serving as a naval officer in World War I, the Hartford-born oil executive graduated from Yale and became closely associated with the OSS and CIA. He founded the Avalon Foundation, since renamed the Mellon Foundation, which has funded pacification programs inside American society. (Outed spy Valerie Plame worked under cover at the Brewster Jennings "brass plate" company, which acted as the CIA's counter-proliferation department.) Although the information remains classified, it had to be OSS chief Bill Donovan who prompted the formation of Fairfield University as an intelligence training center for potential CIA recruits vetted from the elite preparatory schools in Connecticut.
 
During the war in Europe, a noncommissioned office of Russian Jewish descent assigned to U.S. Defense Intelligence worked on Operation Paperclip (the transport of Nazi scientists to U.S. laboratories) and Project Artichoke (smuggling German Jews into Palestine in support of a Zionist state). His name was J.D. "Jerry" Salinger. Later, he served in the Counter-Intelligence Corps, debriefing and reassigning Nazi officers, including those who had conducted psychiatric experiments on prisoners of war.
 
At war's end, Salinger lived in Tarrytown, New York, but was soon ordered to move across the state border to Stamford, Connecticut, close to Fairfield University. He resided in a converted barn, out of  public view, presumably to continue his special area of intelligence work, the field testing of the MK-ULTRA methods refined by the sadistically clinical Dr. Sidney Gottlieb (the pseudonym of Joseph Schieder), who ran the main mind-control lab at Jesuit-run Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., which is also a finishing school for diplomats in the State Department.
 
In the Connecticut countryside during his "lost years", Salinger penned "The Catcher in the Rye", which contains the command code-words for MK-ULTRA assassins. The protagonist Holden Caulfield is a study of a paranoiac passive-aggressive character, whose favorite expression is: "You're killing me."
 
CIA Partners with Organized Crime in New England
 
Around 1950, while Salinger was in Stamford, the CIA recruited a South Boston convict nicknamed "Whitey" Bulger to supply young runaways for mind-control experiments under the fast-expanding MK-ULTRA programs being set up at 44 universities across the United States. The centers for the New England drug experiments were probably the Whiting Forensic Facility at the Connecticut Valley Hospital in Middleford, Connecticut, and Bridgewater Hospital in Massachusetts, the region's psychiatric facilities for the criminally insane.
 
With CIA backing, Bulger built up his Winter Hill Gang, composed mainly of Irishmen, who strong-armed their way to control over the Boston's gambling scene and drug trafficking. While little is known about the political activities of the Bulger gang, its rise to crime dominance coincided with the expansion of weapons smuggling into Northern Ireland in support of the IRA. A parallel cross-Atlantic traffic in drugs (and illegal immigration in the reverse direction) began at the same time. The predominantly Irish political machine of Boston ­ from the Prohibition Era smuggling tycoon Joseph Kennedy Sr, to House Majority Leader Tip O'Neill ­ gave their blessings to the flourishing organized crime network and voiced support for the patriotic IRA "freedom fighters," who returned the favor to Washington with murderous attacks on American-loathing British figures such as Lord Montbatten.
 
Connecticut, under control of the Patriciarca crime family, was off-limits to Bulger. The day-to-day operations of the Sicilian immigrants were run by Bill Grasso, head of the clan that later produced Connecticut's first female governor.
 
Starting in the 1980s, the DOJ, FBI and CIA launched an all-out war against the Patriciarca mob ­ in order to install their puppet Whitey Bulger as crime boss of New England. FBI agent John Connelly took credit for infiltrating and busting up the Patriarca clan, but later he was exposed as a mole for Bulger. By the early 1990s, Bulger set up his Jai Alai Associates, a betting syndicate based in Connecticut and Florida. Finally, all of New England was safe for CIA smuggling, support for terrorism, money-laundering and mind-control operations.
 
In 2011, Bulger made headlines with his arrest in Malibu, California, where he had lived for more than a decade "undetected" despite being on the FBI "most wanted" list - on a long vacation thanks to his relationship with the CIA. If there was one point of irritation, however, between the Irish mobster and his controllers, it was his opposition to drug use by teenagers. After seeing first-hand how MK-ULTRA had destroyed the minds of his young recruits, Bulger ordered his gang members never to sell drugs to teenagers. Even a ruthless mobster has more decency that the self-styled "patriots" who run the intelligence services.
 
Child Porn Hub for New York and Washington
 
Whatever its genteel image of colonial homes and autumnal foliage, Connecticut has a sleazy underside embedded in its servant pool, welfare households and the chronic unemployed. Bridgeport, with its low-income Puerto Rican population, is a major center for prostitution and recruitment of prostitutes for VIP clients in New York and the nation's capital.
 
The pedophile rings have a social-economic hierarchy ­ at the top are the VIP clients, then the intermediaries, often Catholic priests or social-services managers, further down the ladder the operatives ­ losers recruited from prep schools and college campuses - and finally the supply itself - money-hungry willing parents and the unwillingly abducted children.
 
Newtown, like Fairfield and Stamford, is part of the Diocese of Bridgeport, which got into legal trouble in 2001 due to lawsuits by 23 victims of pedophilia committed by priests. Bishop Edward Egan, then diocese head, was a protector of sexual offender priests, sending them to other areas when parental complaints reached the ears of the police. After the plaintiffs won an out-of-court settlement, the Diocese petitioned the US Supreme Court to quash the thousands of documents detailing the beastly sex crimes. In 2009 Opus Dei honcho Justice Antonin Scalia determined that the court records should not be made public.
 
In this past year's pedophile scandal at Penn State, another Opus Dei leader, former FBI director Louis Freeh, was hired as a consultant by the Nittany Lions football team. His whitewash report put most of the blame on head coach Joe Paterno, while suppressing the names and backgrounds of the wealthy and powerful boosters who were provided sexual services from the young football players.
 
In Connecticut, the Vatican had an interest in wiping the slate clean, and so did the CIA. The clean slate turned out to be a bloody mess.
 
Agency-Spawned Pedophiles
 
The MK-ULTRA program that reached into campuses across Connecticut quickly created a human garbage heap of wrecked minds and twisted souls. The child abuse and drugs routinely administered to young trainees led to a permanent social fixture of sadism and sexual abuse throughout New England from the gutter up to the governing class.
 
In 2011, a Newtown resident named Edwin Wilson was arrested for having a months-long sexual relationship with a 4-year-old girl and producing child-porn videos of their sexual encounters. The arrest was a part of a wide crackdown order the state attorney general, Richard Blumenthal ­ which boosted his successful campaign in the U.S. Senate race. Other cases included: a 24-year-old Hispanic male in Hartford who shot videos of sex with a pre-teen girl; a DJ in Plainfield arraigned on similar charges, an older theater and film teacher accused of using Taft school's equipment to make kiddie porn ­ the list goes on in sickening detail. Fairfield University, where MK-ULTRA was implanted into New England, recently saw two staffers implicated in the rape of 23 Haitian boys during the earthquake relief effort.
 
Adam Lanza fits the profile of a pedophile-ring recruit ­ young enough to approach children at the local schools and in the churches, possessing the computer skills to produce child-porn videos and typically passive-aggressive in personality. The Lanzas attended the Saint Rosa of Lima Church, where eight child parishioners were among the shooting victims. Santa Rosa is the very same order that sponsors the western-state hospital that employed Michael Jackson's physician Dr. Conrad Murray. As in the case of Jackson's Neverland, after a child-sex experiment blossoms, it must be shut down.
 
The Lone Gun-Boy Theory
 
Nancy Lanza kept an arsenal of firearms, and ordered her son to be constantly under watch by older boys. She must have had good reason for being armed to the teeth. Judging from her hoard of rifles and hand guns, she was expecting an all-out assault from a coven of pedophiles, not an attack by a single shooter. The lone gun-boy theory is sheer nonsense ­ her son may have been an accomplice in giving the assailants access to his home but ended up murdered as a patsy.
 
The coven is larger and more powerful than Mrs. Lanza could ever have imagined. Sexual violation is the key to creating intelligence agents and assassins who are impervious to reason and mercy, lacking any original thoughts or moral qualms. Plus a supply of children is needed in Congress and the White House to entertain the satraps and moguls from Colombian drug lords to Israeli weapons dealers and French money launderers, not to mention America's own homegrown pervs.
 
The Motive: Payback for a Double-Cross
 
If the culprits had been Adam Lanza and his pals, then their response to grounding would have been something like posting photos and address of naked children. The method of the shooting ­ point-blank execution-style gun shots ­ indicate that the assailants were professional hit men, probably allied with the Winter Hill Gang.
 
The Sandy Hook assault happened probably because of a split between competing institutions and diverging policies. On one hand, the gangland figures who cooperated with CIA mind-control program that promoted child-sex as a means of ensuring obedience and secrecy were being challenged by politicians playing up parental demands to clean up the scandalous child-sex problem in Connecticut.
 
The dirty FBI agent John Connelly was more of a double agent and go-between for the Feds and not simply a Winter Hill mole as portraying at his sentencing. The arrest of Whitey Bulger was a pure-and-simple double-cross by the FBI and CIA, who had used him as an ally in MK-ULTRA and informant for more than a half-century. In his ambitious drive to win a U.S. senatorial seat, state attorney general and now Senator Blumenthal broke the basic rules of mob cooperation. And now that has led to a war on the streets and in the schools.
 
Unlike the Sicilian crime families who went down easy, the fighting Irish criminals can be counted on to put up a street battle with the same flair as in the movie "The Gangs of New York." The gangsters have no shortage of allies in the pimps, drug dealers, pedophiles, punks and deranged freaks who have been caught up in the sudden dragnet. The police are outnumbered and easily outgunned. It's happened before, as in Fort Apache in the South Bronx. Sandy Hook is just the first installment of a payback. If the Feds push any harder, then Bridgeport and Boston will soon be looking like Belfast during the troubles or Beirut in the bad old days.
 
Stop Drugging the Kids
 
The mass media is under pressure to cover up the incident with sympathetic blather instead of a sustained probe. Forensic evidence is being literally buried. America is moving on ­ where to, nobody knows. The politicians and cops are now silent and glum. Relying on arrests and wiretapping, they have forgotten that the fight against crime begins with addressing social justice, economic fairness and education ­ and in some unfortunate cases, psychiatric care.
 
Was a Senate seat worth the lives of all those children and teachers?  Blumenthal, who paints himself as a clone of the erstwhile New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, will have to live with that question for the remainder of his life. Is the CIA satisfied that its mind-control techniques that have created hordes of homicidal monsters from Iraq to Libya and now Connecticut?
 
The lesson of Sandy Hook is that mind-control cannot itself be controlled. Programmed killers are like robots without power-off switches. The process of transforming innocent children into robots through sexual abuse is inhumane and a crime. Whatever MK-ULTRA is called today - since we know it still exists after seeing the Abu Ghraib Prison photos - it must be shut down forever or the murderous nightmare will go on and on. And mind-altering drugs are not just for sinister purposes, since at least 60 percent of U.S. children are on a pharmaceutical dosages long before they can learn how to think. Even parents act as mind-controllers against their own kids.
 
Now, with the investigation terminated, comes the diversionary exercise of "gun control", a national effort led by Joe Biden, a member of the Knights of Malta, a politician with an intelligence background who is sworn to protect the interests of the Vatican. Say it ain't so, Joe. Leave intact the right of armed self-defense or the gangsters will take over everything, but get rid of the drugs and end the mind control ­ and America will be a safer place, especially for its children.
 
Yoichi Shimatsu, a science writer based in Hong Kong, provides herbal therapy and health counseling to the victims of the Fukushima radiation crisis.

[Christopher Marlowe]

This post blaming the "Sandy Hook Massacre" on the Catholic Church takes the cake for baseless speculation.

Adam Lanza was raped by a known, convicted Catholic pedophile priest named Fr John J Castaldo when Adam Lanza was 6 years old, when his family moved to Newtown, CT, in 1998.

There is exactly ZERO proof of this. Castaldo was in Newton and Lanza was in Newton in 1998, and the Lanzas may have been attending Mass at St Rose at that time. Lanza did not attend the school at St Rose until after Castaldo left. There is no evidence that Lanza was ever an alter boy, and the normal age for a boy to begin is 10 -12. Adam was 10 in 2002, AFTER Cataldo left the parish. When exactly did Castaldo have the opportunity to molest Adam Lanza?  Also, Adam Lanza was 6 to 9 years old when Castaldo was in Newton, which seems a little young for Castaldo's homosexual pederast tastes.

This is another error in this very stupid report: Castaldo is said to be a "pedophile", but the more appropriate word here is "pederast". A pedophile is sexually attracted to children; a pederast is sexually attracted to pubescent boys. Pederasty [Gr: "boy lover"] is very common is homosexual culture and has been for several millennia.
[See: http://www.wnd.com/2002/04/13722/ citing a study by Judith Reisman showing that male homosexuals "sexually molest young boys with an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls. ..."  Considering that homosexuals make up a small minority of the population, it is amazing to think that they bugger boys at a rate 5 times that of the heterosexual population molests young girls. Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2002/04/13722/#SI8mRIZML9fxvQZR.99  This boy buggery dates back to the days of ancient Greece: http://www.goddiscussion.com/64016/homo ... tion-rite/]

Castaldo was arrested in 2001 for having conversations with a police officer that Castaldo thought was a 14 year old boy. http://bishopaccountability.org/assign/ ... John_J.htm
Also in 2001, Castaldo was also accused of buggering another 14 year old boy back in the 1990's at another parish.  That's not a pedophile. That's a pederast.  Around 90% of the cases where priests were accused of "pedophilia" were actually cases of pederasty. And that is why fags should not be priests.

He never stopped thinking about the traumatic moment of being raped by "Christ on earth", which is what priests call themselves.

That is not true. Catholic Priests REPRESENT Christ on earth. Catholics believe that Christ is present in the Holy Eucharist. A Priest has hands that are blessed, and he confects the Eucharist.  But it is not the Priest in the Eucharist, but God. There is only one Mass. Christ said the Last Supper before He was Crucified, and all Masses go back to that Mass.  A Priest hears confessions, and he stands in for Christ, and is the minister of the sacrament. But the confession is made to God. A Priest witnesses a marriage, but God unites a man and a woman.

The person writing this article is just an anti-Catholic, who takes every opportunity to attack the Church.

He goes on talking about Catholic Priest sex abuse, and all of the problems it has caused, but he never actually even gave one scintilla of evidence that it is even relevant. Nothing. No evidence. He goes on rambling, trying to blame murders of little children on the Catholic Church. With ZERO evidence. How STUPID can this be?

I could go on for hours, but you get the idea. An evil brain has been created, and has been cooking for 14 years.
Like most Catholic priest rape victims, Adam never tells anyone.

HUH? How would one go about PROVING that last statement? If most of the victims never tell anyone, then how do we KNOW they exist? How do we quantify those persons who never tell anyone?  Are there scads of secret videos of buggery being held by the police, who are just waiting for the boys to come forward?  Oh, and Catholic Priest rape victims never come forward, but all the other ones do?  

A lot of people come forward and tell about sexual abuse many years after the fact. Even after the priest is dead.  You know why? Because there is a dinner bell ringing, and it is called: The Class Action Lawsuit. A fag priest gets caught buggering boys, or priest is falsely accused, or a priest has the sad misfortune to die, and then all of these people come out of the woodwork to sue the Catholic Church.

This guy doesn't even read the links he sets. This is the link to "one of Castaldo's accusers": http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/crime/ct-m ... Oh7eLamB4w  
At the bottom:

The Diocese of Bridgeport is surprised to learn through a press release of the claim by Brooks Thopsey that he was abused by former priest John Castaldo.

The Diocese has credible information dating back to 2004 that Mr. Thopsey was not sexually abused by John Castaldo. In the past, a representative on behalf of Mr. Thopsey had contacted us to claim that Mr. Thopsey had experienced some psychological harm related to another matter, but not as a result of being sexually abused by John Castaldo. Three years later, his father called the Diocese suggesting that Brooks Thopsey had been harmed. The Diocese immediately reached out, but Brooks Thopsey (who was already an adult) never responded.

Notably, the "Trumbull man"-- referenced in the press release as having filed a similar lawsuit against the Diocese of Bridgeport and John Castaldo -- contacted the Diocese on Monday to say that he had instructed his attorney to withdraw the case because he has severe memory problems and now doubts the truth of his claims.

The attorney in both cases is Joel T. Faxon of New Haven.

While there are certainly cases of molestation that exist, and some are committed by Catholic Priests who are fags, the law is supposed to be that a person is responsible for their own intentional torts. Buggering a boy is an intentional tort, so the Catholic Church should not be responsible unless the Church authorities knew about the abuse and didn't prevent further acts, and or covered up the evidence. Then the Bishop would be responsible for negligent management. But somehow the Jew lawyers and the ignorant public have been promoting this meme of the "pedophile priest", and the state legislatures were convinced that it was in the public interest to change the statutes of limitations, (SOL). SOLs are there to protect the courts from frivolous claims that are based on incidents that took place long ago: after all the physical evidence has been destroyed; after the memories have gotten hazy; after the possible witnesses and even the accused has died. The SOLs were changed, and the dinner bell was rung, and the settlements have run into the billions.  

A full 70% of the claims for monetary damages alleging sexual abuse by Catholic priests were brought anywhere from one to five decades after the abuse was claimed to have occurred. Since 2002, organized groups like SNAP and VOTF – seemingly formed specifically to promote lawsuits against the Catholic Church – have also promoted legislation state by state to increase or discard statutes of limitation for bringing those lawsuits. These groups, and the contingency lawyers whose agenda they serve, have repeatedly declared that victims of sexual abuse cannot come to terms with it and report it for decades. Apparently, Baptist accusers need a lot less time than Catholic accusers.
http://thesestonewalls.com/gordon-macra ... -be-named/

Many Catholic bishops have been accused of orchestrating a cover-up by the seemingly abhorrent practice of quietly transferring accused priests without reporting them to civil authorities or warning new parishes about the accusations. As indefensible as that revelation was, it represented only a fraction of the claims against the Catholic Church, and it hasn't happened in the United States for over 20 years.

"There is considerable doubt about the veracity of many of the new claims, quite a few of which were made after it became apparent that the Church was willing to settle sex abuse cases for big bucks." ("Fleecing the Shepherd," Boston Phoenix, December 10-16, 2004).

"In 2002, a New Hampshire diocese faced accusations of abuse from 62 individuals. Rather than spending the time and resources looking into the merits of the cases, 'Diocesan officials did not even ask for specifics such as the dates and specific allegations for the claims,' New Hampshire's Union Leader reported. Getting money from the diocese could Not have been any easier for the complainants. It was almost as Simple as a trip to an ATM machine... 'I've never seen anything Like it,' a pleased and much richer plaintiff attorney admitted." (David Pierre, Double Standard: Abuse Scandals and the Attack on the Catholic Church, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (August 11, 2010)  p. 125).

The source of these quotes are from a priest, Fr Gordon MacRea, who is in prison on a false accusation of buggering a young man back in the 1990's. http://thesestonewalls.com/case-history/
Go to his site and read his story and you will agree it's all BUNK.  Even people who totally hate the Catholic Church will agree it's bunk.  

Anyway, MacRae found out from his fellow prisoners how a scam was being run on the Catholic Church:

As I was writing this post, a few younger prisoners stopped to talk with me. They are the same age as Bishop Eddie Long's accusers, so I asked their opinion on the case. They were careful to weigh both sides. But when I told them about the rest of this post, they all started laughing, and I asked them why.

   

"People are so gullible," one said. "People think no one would accuse a priest just for money. I know a lot of people who would do it in a heartbeat." He added, ironically, "About the only person we wouldn't do this to is you!"

Are people really as gullible as this young prisoner suspects? Do Catholics really believe every sordid story of priests' exploiting helpless and hapless teenagers all those years ago? Just before I wrote "Sex Abuse and Signs of Fraud" for The Catholic League in 2005, I was approached by a prisoner with an offer he thought I couldn't refuse.

    He asked me if I could find out the name of a priest – any priest – who might have been present in his childhood community around 1972 or so. He said he heard the Church would settle if he accused a priest of sexually abusing him back then. He offered to give me some of the money. Of course, I refused. I thought he was joking. I was wrong.

Two years later, I read in a local newspaper that the same lawyer described above – [Who "had never seen anything like" the Catholic Church settling an abuse case by writing a multi-million dollar check without even a claim being filed in a court of law...] – was representing a prison inmate "whose life was ruined" when he was sexually abused by a now 80 year old priest in that same community in 1972. It was, of course, the same guy who approached me. I quickly wrote to a lawyer for my diocese informing him that I had firsthand knowledge of this scam. I urged him and the diocese not to settle this claim, but to expose and publish the name of this accuser because I had information that would clear the accused priest and expose this fraud.

I never received any reply.

Lazy minds and greed.

This article is attempting to slander the Catholic Church through the Sandy Hook incident with ZERO proof. It's a sad example of journalism, and really is only a display of animus and lack of reasoning skills.

[Michael K.]

Yes, the blog cited goes way over the top blaming the Catholic Church in some overly-broad way, and tastelessly describing things with little understanding.  I am glad that you rebut the untrue and slanderous elements of what is being said, as well as the sloppy logic used.  I am not into bashing Catholics, myself.

On the other hand, I still see a strong circumstantial possibility of the theory holding some water.  John Castaldo has been established as a pederast, so we can assume that both a motive and an opportunity to molest Lanza existed in his case.  When you see one rat, it almost always means that there are many others close by, or in other words there were probably numerous children molested and/or other possible cohorts who didn't get caught (not necessarily Catholic priests, either.)  And the closeness of proximity has been established.  Also circumstantially, but persuasively, the age at which Lanza was first in contact with John Castaldo was approximately the same age as the majority of the children killed, seven.  And nobody seems to be suggesting that Castaldo was being falsely accused for money when he was stung by police in the act of solicitation.

This seems lacking:

The Diocese has credible information dating back to 2004 that Mr. Thopsey was not sexually abused by John Castaldo. In the past, a representative on behalf of Mr. Thopsey had contacted us to claim that Mr. Thopsey had experienced some psychological harm related to another matter, but not as a result of being sexually abused by John Castaldo. Three years later, his father called the Diocese suggesting that Brooks Thopsey had been harmed. The Diocese immediately reached out, but Brooks Thopsey (who was already an adult) never responded.

That doesn't reach the standard you are striving for, since nobody can prove a negative.  Also "a representative on the behalf of Mr. Thopsey" cannot establish that a negative has been proven either, or anything else of substance.  It's all hearsay, one way or the other, but certainly is not a positive rebuttal.

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Need I remind you all that Jews are the architects of MKUltra....

[Michael K.]

There are several outstanding clues about the Sandy Hook School shooting which appear in another thread, and which I need to organize in one place, so if some of this is redundant, please forgive me.

We have some similarities between Sandy Hook and Dunblane, in that the actors in both tragedies appear to have had unusual unofficial access to the schools and students who would later be killed.  

In Dunblane we have a killer, whom it was reported by credible, documented sources, that had frequent open access to the school and close relationships with some of the students.  This was associated with homosexual activity between unofficial visitors and some of the underage boys.  This was all allegedly connected to Freemasonic networks of power and influence, and although corroborated by three separate witnesses, none of this ever appeared in the official report:

http://stolenkids-dunblane.blogspot.com ... chool.html

Thomas Minogue
94 Victoria Terrace
Dunfermline
Fife

Thursday 24th April

Lord Gill,
Lord Justice Clerk
Parliament House
EDINBURGH
EH1 1RQ

Dear Sir,

Complaint regarding events at Queen Victoria School 1989-1992

With reference to your letter of 6th March*1 I would accept your offer that I make
known to you my concerns regarding matters relating to the Queen Victoria School...

Circumstances leading to my investigation of the ex-housemaster's
complaint.

In February 2003 as a petitioner to the Scottish Parliament I was asked by the Justice
2 Committee to provide evidence of specific instances where a Judges/Sheriffs
membership of the Freemasons had caused problems. As I am not alone in Scotland in
perceiving the Dunblane Inquiry as a case where Masonic membership had played a
part, both in the events leading up to the Inquiry and during the Inquiry-I cited this as
a case in point.

Many newspaper stories and Internet articles have dealt with the supposed Masonic
influence of Thomas Hamilton having allowed him to obtain licences for firearms
against police advice. Another theory commonly broadcast is that Hamilton's
connections to prominent figures in public life had allowed him access to Queen
Victoria School Dunblane and that these facts had been instrumental in Lord Cullen (a
Mason) imposing an illegal 100-year ban on documents relating to Hamilton's
activities prior to the shootings*2. I decided to research these assertions.

I contacted an ex-housemaster at QVS who was reported to have made numerous
complaints about bullying and abuse of pupils at QVS between 1989 and 1992. A
website carried a letter from the ex-housemaster which alleged that one regular and
apparently influential visitor to the school between 1989 and 1992 was Thomas
Hamilton the Dunblane killer. The ex-housemaster confirmed this fact in a telephone
conversation*3 and also claimed that the MOD (HM Commissioners), Scottish Office,
Procurator Fiscal, and Stirling Council would not act on his complaints. The exhousemaster
also believed that Freemasonry had been a factor in the unreported abuse
of pupils at QVS and also had adversely influenced the investigation of his
complaints.

I have been able to independently corroborate 3 of the 4 main allegations made
by the housemaster, namely that:

1/ Thomas Hamilton was a frequent, and influential visitor to QVS.
*1 See letter from Marlene Olsen page 11.
*2 See Euro-realist Internet article page 120—125.
*3 See Telephone Notes 132—133.
1
2/ Numerous complaints about bullying and abuse were made by the
housemaster to various authorities to no avail because of the lack of a thorough
investigation by the authorities.
3/ H M Commissioners ignored or were in ignorance of the above two facts.
Allegation 1: Thomas Hamilton & Friends of QVS.
1. Many visitors who the ex-housemaster described as "toffs" would arrive at the
school and some of these visitors would take boys home for weekends.
2. Visitors to the school had access to the grounds and buildings within the
school, which concerned him for fear that these apparently unauthorised
visitors, might abduct a pupil.
3. He had challenged visitors who were not known to him and had complained to
the headmaster about the presence of these individuals only to be told that
these people were "Friends of Queen Victoria School" and were to be left
alone.
4. Because of his concerns he suggested the issue of photographic passes for
authorised personnel.
5. Boys who had spent weekends with some of the "Friends" would come back
in a disturbed state of mind.
6. One pupil tried to hang himself after being buggered and this was hushed up.
7. He later found out that one regular visitor who, frequented the firing range,
had watched naked primary level boys in the shower area, on dress parade,
and visited teachers in their quarters was Thomas Hamilton the Dunblane
killer.
8. Lord Cullen and George Robertson were mentioned by name as being visitors.
9. The ex-housemaster felt that if his complaints had been heeded and acted upon
the massacre at Dunblane might not have happened given that Thomas
Hamilton was well known to the police at this time.

Independent Corroboration

I had initially thought that the Queen Victoria School did not feature in the Dunblane
Inquiry. However it is a matter of record that substantive evidence regarding Thomas
Hamilton's association with Queen Victoria School was given by three separate and
unconnected witnesses to the Inquiry*1
In her unchallenged evidence on Day 3, Grace Jones Ogilvie Hamilton's neighbour
told of how Thomas Hamilton organised and carried out camping expeditions for his
boys clubs at Loch Lomondside and Queen Victoria School. Grace Jones Ogilvie
also spoke of Hamilton showing her videos of what he described to her as "my boys".
In his unchallenged evidence on Day 14, Ian Steven Boal, an undergraduate sports
student, told of how in 1995 Thomas Hamilton had used his influence at Queen
Victoria School to obtain him (Boal) a part time teaching position at the school.
In his unchallenged evidence on Day 18, Robert Mark Ure a neighbour of Hamilton
told of how he wished to contact Stirling Rifle and Pistol Club as his wife who had
been to the rifle range at Queen Victoria School with Thomas Hamilton, had
embezzled money from the club. Hamilton had said that the Stirling Rifle and Pistol
Club was not a static building and its address might have been in his mail.
*1/ Ogilvie pages 100--102, Boal pages 103--105, Ure pages 106--108.
2
None of the three independent witnesses to Hamilton's involvement with, and
influence at Queen Victoria School were cross-examined or questioned further by the
legal representatives of any of the parties represented. Lord Cullen did not ask any
further questions of these three witnesses and there is no mention of Thomas
Hamilton's involvement with the Queen Victoria School in Lord Cullen's Report.
Conclusion.
I found the ex-housemasters allegations regarding the presence of Thomas Hamilton
at Queen Victoria School Dunblane convincing. In my opinion he was truthful and the
evidence of the above three witnesses regarding Thomas Hamilton corroborates my
impression of his veracity and suggests that he should have been heeded when he
complained at the lack of proper procedures, and the climate of fear that pervaded the
school...
Hamilton, while shooting on the range at Queen Victoria School obviously carried
firearms and ammunition within the school. The possibility of Thomas Hamilton
running amok at QVS must have been real, but is something that the Cullen Report
does not consider or mention.

In the case of Sandy Hook, we have certain similarities, starting with the unusual relationship existing between the shooter and the school prior to the shootings.  Authorities have reported that Adam Lanza was involved in an altercation with four staffers at the school the day before he returned and killed three of them.  His mother Nancy Lanza, was also reported to have "grown close" to many of the children shot as a volunteer the previous year, although there seems to be no record of he being employed by the school.  Numerous reports have been called into question because they report conflicting stories.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/nyreg ... l?hp&_r=1&

Although reports at the time indicated that the principal of the school let Mr. Lanza in because she recognized him, his mother did not work at the school, and he shot his way in, defeating a security system requiring visitors to be buzzed in. Moments later, the principal was shot dead when she went to investigate the sound of gunshots. The school psychologist was also among those who died.

My personal thoughts on this are that a .223 rifle is not a very effective door opener.  It is more likely to make pencil-sized holes in glass.  How it is that the original reports could be so seriously wrong, or who is responsible for contradicting the original reports, it doesn't say.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -page.html

One of the biggest questions remaining ever since the shooting was reported on Friday was Nancy's connection to the school which was clearly singled out as a target by Adam.

The majority of his shooting was limited to the reception, where he forced his way into the building and killed those standing in his way, and then to a single first grade classroom.

Those children are thought to be the ones that Nancy grew close with during the last academic year, when they were in kindergarten.

Initial reports immediately after the shooting claimed that Nancy was a full time or even substitute teacher at the elementary school, though as the chaos of the day slowed, school officials said that she was not on any records of having worked there in any formal capacity.

That option leaves the possibility open that she volunteered her time with the young children, though school board member Cody McCubbin could not confirm that role when asked by MailOnline.
That was echoed by Lillian Bittman, a former school board member who told the Wall Street Journal: 'No one has heard of her. Teachers don't know her.'

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/pote ... SYYsVGkYLO

Adam Lanza, 20, shot his mother Nancy Lanza dead at their family home before driving to the school and targeting a kindergarten class at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., sources said. Sources also told The Post that Lanza "had a dispute" with his mother...At least one parent said Lanza's mother was a substitute teacher at the school. But her name did not appear on a staff list. And the law enforcement official said investigators were unable to establish any connection so far between her and the school.

http://www.capitalbay.com/uk/282272-rev ... erday.html

Murder: Adam Lanza is believed to have visited the school the day before Friday massacre and was involved in an altercation with four members of staff

Reports have emerged that Adam Lanza had visited Sandy Hook Elementary the day before Friday's massacre during which he was involved in an altercation with four members of staff at the school - three of whom are now dead.

The fourth teacher - and only survivor of the altercation - wasn't at school yesterday and is currently being interviewed by investigators. It hasn't been revealed what the argument was over or if it was reported to authorities.

The staff member's testimony might be an 'important piece of information' for discerning motive in this case, reports NBC.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... sseau.html

[Lanza] may have targeted teacher Lauren Rousseau, police believe, as he shot up her car before he entered the school to commit one of America's worst mass shootings.

Police are looking into whether he targeted Miss Rousseau, whose classroom was his second stop after killing the principal and the school psychologist in the front office.

Previous reports have said Lanza may have targeted the school because his mother, Nancy Lanza, was volunteering there.

Fox News reports that Adam Lanza was jealous that his mother may have loved the students at Sandy Hook more than him.

The shooting of Miss Rousseau's car, and her subsequent murder, raises questions about whether the teacher was specifically targeted.

How is it that Adam Lanza shot up a teacher's car in the parking lot, using a very loud rifle, without attracting law enforcement before proceeding into the school?  Not that there weren't bullet holes in the car, but just how did they get there without attracting the attention of everyone within a quarter mile?

[Michael K.]

CONNECTICUT'S CULTURE OF PEDOPHILIA AND THE COURTS

http://divorceinconnecticut.blogspot.co ... phile.html

PART VII: LINDA WIEGAND, A PEDOPHILE CONSPIRACY?

Posted by Catharine Sloper,  Sunday, December 5, 2010

I have to tell you right away that I'm not a big one for conspiracy theories so writing about this next topic--The Pedophile Conspiracy in Connecticut--probably won't necessarily be my strong suit.  However, I don't think a discussion of the Wiegand Case is truly complete without a discussion regarding this topic because many supporters of Linda Wiegand believe a Pedophile Conspiracy exists and have made it an important part of the discussion regarding Linda Wiegand's case.

The start of my research in this area begins with an article by Kris Millegan dated November 1, 2001 entitled "The Pedophile Network in Connecticut."  Milligan states that there is a pedophile conspiracy reaching up to the top levels of government including recent President George Bush and Cheney and also including Warren Buffet, former President Gerald Ford and President Ronald Reagan.  Millegan states that learning about the Wiegand case "led [him or her] into a labyrinthine world of judicial and political corruption with many tantalizing links to a national pedophile network closely identified with the Bush family."

This article goes on to say that this pedophile network silenced the state newspaper, The Hartford Courant, and prevented the paper from reporting fairly on Linda Wiegand's case when Lou Kiefer, Tom Wilkinson's lawyer, sued the newspaper and obtained a $300,000 settlement against it.  My recollection is that this settlement came from Attorney Kiefer suing Connecticut and Vermont's Child Protective Services, but perhaps more money came from a lawsuit against the Courant.  I'm not sure about this.

Most significant, this article asks why the Court sealed the Massameno Report which found evidence that Tom Wilkinson abused his children.  It also asks why the Court sealed 30 hours of Ben and Jon Wiegand's taped testimony of the sexual abuse they allegedly experienced in the hands of Tom Wilkinson.  Why wouldn't this information all come before the Judge at trial and be subjected to examination by experts and attorneys involved in the case?  This is all quite puzzling.

But in Connecticut you don't have to go very far for puzzling behavior when it comes to how sexual abuse is handled.  Specifically, Connecticut is the only state in the country with a hospital, not connected to the Catholic Church, The Institute of Living (IOL), which, starting in the early 1980s provided treatment to cure priests of pedophilia.

With the support of  the IOL, these priests ended up returning to their posts in various Churches where they pretty much continued on to molest other children.

One of these priests, Father John Geoghan, of Massachusetts, was accused of molesting 130 children before he was arrested.  Yet after treating him, the Institute still verified that he was sufficiently in control of his pedophilia to return to his ministry stating "We judge Father Geoghan to be clinically quite safe to resume his pastoral ministry..."  Who were they kidding?

When the situation blew up in the face of the Institute of Living and The Hartford Courant exposed what was going on, Dr. Harold Schwartz, the Director of the IOL, blamed the Church stating "The Church didn't tell us the truth about the patients it sent us because it often didn't report the exact number of children these priests had molested."  I don't know.  This seems like a pretty pathetic excuse.

Granting that pedolphilia is incurable and that a molester is almost certain to molest again, does it matter if it is one child or ten that a priest has molested?  Shouldn't a psychiatrist be the first to say that the fact that a priest has molested just one child should be enough to keep that priest from ever serving in a parrish again?  In particular, shouldn't a psychiatrist with substantial experience in the treatment of pedophilia be the first to say that?

The IOL's refusal to acknowledge its failures when confronted and its pathetic, feeble excuses for its failure to protect children while providing treatment for pedophile priests says everything about the incapacity of the psychiatrists at the IOL to grasp the seriousness of the tragedy of sexual abuse.  On the contrary, professionals like this at the Institute of Living apparently don't think that the sexual abuse of children is such a bad thing because they sure didn't take even the most minimal steps to protect such children from the perpetrator priests in their care who were abusing them.

Why is this relevant to the Linda Wiegand case?  The answer is that Dr. Kenneth Robson, the psychiatrist who did the evaluation of Ben and Jon Wiegand and denied that the two boys were sexually abused, was affiliated with the Institute of Living, which I've shown has a history of being a hotbed of denial, a hospital that earned thousands and thousands of dollars from the Catholic Church by minimizing how damaging the sexual abuse was that Priests were perpetrating against children.

Supporters of Linda Wiegand want to talk about some conspiracy as if some complicated conspiracy was necessary to explain what they see as an injustice that occurred in this case.  But no, there doesn't have to be some big conspiracy.  All that is necessary is a bunch of people in positions of power, all of whom don't think sexual abuse of children is such a bad thing.  Throw in a little misogyny and you're good!

http://www.consciousbeingalliance.com/2 ... n-america/

By February 15, 2011, the behavior of then seven year-old Max Liberti had become so extreme that his mother Sunny Kelley (Liberti) had become desperate.  All the evidence suggested that Max was being raped and tortured.  Instead of helping his mother, the Connecticut Family Court system had persecuted her and protected the abuser.  While Sunny Kelley desperately explored every avenue to get the courts and their experts to acknowledge that little Max was being hurt, the judges, lawyers and other experts were conspiring against her.  Law enforcement evaded responsibility and frequently insinuated that Sunny Kelley was the problem.

"This is the time when Max had suicidal thoughts," said Dr. Eli Newberger M.D., an expert who has supported Sunny Kelley's case.  A pediatrician and nationally renowned expert on child abuse, Dr. Eli Newberger teaches at Harvard Medical School and founded the Child Protection Team and the Family Development Program at Children's Hospital in Boston.  "I was seriously concerned for his life."

Max Liberti had become increasingly psychotic and uncontrollable, running around groping adults' privates, singing songs about killing himself, or dissociating, staring off, lost in space, unreachable by his mother or the other women trying to protect and care for him.  Max was hitting himself in the face, and talking about death.

As evidence of Max's abuse and torture mounted, his mother Sunny Kelley took every reasonable step to protect him.  The abuse against Max escalated in direct proportion to Sunny's efforts to separate herself and her son from her abusive husband.  It is the same for at least ten other protective moms who I have interviewed in detail for this story.

"It was a process," says Sunny Kelley, a white, middle class, affluent, 38 year-old year old professional sound engineer living in southern Connecticut.  "There were a lot of things I didn't understand.  I was naïve.  But I was very, very, very careful never to accuse Max's father of anything.  With every professional, with every visit to the hospital or therapists or pediatrician, all I did was to repeat what my son had told me.  But no matter what I did, it was always turned around on me that I was the guilty one, that I was making false accusations about my husband."

The details of what happened to Sunny Kelley and Max Liberti belie belief.  The personal details of Sunny Kelley's relationship, her marriage, her sex life, her personal history with sexual abuse, the toileting of her child -- the details of her imperfection as a parent and her emotional response to this judicial abuse -- everything has been scrutinized and used against her.

Although there were at least six years of abuse that Sunny struggled to endure, as is common in many families, her relationship with her new baby carried her through.  Even after she told her abusive husband she wanted a divorce, still it took Sunny nine months to get him out of her bed into a separate bedroom.  From that moment on, the violence against Max escalated with every step she took to protect herself and her son.  As Sunny pressed for her rights, the court increasingly punished her.

Prior to February 15, 2011, Sunny was communicating regularly with Dr. Eli Newberger and Dr. Joyanna Silberg, nationally renowned child abuse experts alarmed by the failure of professionals in the Connecticut Family Court system to protect this child.  These experts were brought into the case after it became clear that the Connecticut Department of Children and Families was not going to protect Max, and neither was anyone else.  Also, over the previous year, Sunny and Max had become very familiar with the Yale Children's Hospital and Yale Child Sex Abuse Clinic.

The divorce trial was held over fourteen days in August 2011 with four additional days in October.  On January 3, 2012, in anticipation of the imminent divorce and custody trial decision, Connecticut's Chief Administrative Judge of Family Matters Judge Lynda Munro ordered that pseudonyms must be used on court documents and public references to the case.  To protect the privacy and rights of the parents -- and the dignity of the child Max -- in case of media attention or legal scrutiny, the Liberti v. Liberti case would be known as 'Jane Doe v. John Roe' with the child being known as 'Peter'...

After five months of research into Sunny Kelley's case, after interviews with mother after mother whose life has been destroyed by the racket of Connecticut Family Courts, after attending Connecticut state hearings and meetings and combing piles of documents, I will now show you how it came to pass that Max Liberti is no longer able to see or visit with his mother Sunny Kelley and is in full custody of the abusive father.   As the time of the publication of this story, Max Liberti has not seen his mother Sunny for over two months...

Another 'celebrated' case of the mid-1990's in which the mother saw no way out but one was the Thomas Wilkinson v. Linda Wiegand case in Connecticut.  Linda Wiegand was a protective mother forced to flee the state of Connecticut with her two children.  She was also eventually hunted down by the FBI, extradited back to Connecticut and thrown in jail.

In January 1993, Linda Wiegand's two children (the oldest boy was then about seven and a half years old) disclosed that the father of one boy, Thomas Wilkinson, had sexually abused them.  Even while the evidence of sexual abuse continued to mount -- disclosures by the children, forensic evidence, and multiple findings of sexual abuse by police, state social services professionals, and courts in both Vermont and New York -- it was not enough evidence for the Connecticut courts.  In 1993, Connecticut court Judge F. Herbert Barall appointed Dr.  Kenneth Robson to evaluate mother Linda Wiegand and her ex-partner Thomas Wilkinson -- he wasn't even the father of one of the abused boys! -- and the two children.

After five months of evaluations, including many meetings with the two boys, Dr. Robson identified a number of factors that he conceded "appear[ed] to support the credibility of the allegations of sexual abuse against the minor children by Thomas Wilkinson." For example, the children's allegations were "specific and consistent," their drawings were "explicit," and their allegations were at least "apparently" spontaneous.  Nonetheless, Dr. Robson delivered his report to the court concluding that the "reported sexual abuse was unlikely."

It gets worse, however, making it clear that it was not a matter of the court making a wrong finding but of Dr. Kenneth Robson supporting pedophilia.  In fact, the problem goes much deeper than either of these problems.

In January of 1994, Linda Wiegand disappeared with her children.  Judge Herbert Barall proceeded with a hearing, awarding custody to Wilkinson and denying Wiegand visitation rights.  In July 1996, Wiegand was arrested in Las Vegas, and both children were delivered to the abuser, Thomas Wilkinson.

What was the magical recipe used by Dr. Kenneth Robson to get the two Wiegand boys to spill their guts to him and disclose sexual abuse that Robson later conspired to hide?  "The farther you get away from spontaneous comments the less likely you are to discover the truth," Dr. Robson told me.  "That was certainly the case in the Wiegand case.  There had been so many people that had questioned those kids that by the time I got to them.  I got the most by playing dumb.  Letting them talk.  I didn't say anything.  Or I said, 'I'm confused, I don't know'."

So why, then, did Dr. Robson help to protect Thomas Wilkinson later?  When I asked Dr. Kenneth Robson a specific question about the Wiegand case in February 2012, Dr. Robson refused to discuss it further.  "I don't think I should comment on the case.  I think the boys are beyond the age of litigation and I don't know all that has happened.  My participation is well known.  My studies and reports are discoverable."

In subsequent hearings, Linda Wiegand's lawyers issued a subpoena to produce any and all copies of audiotaped interviews that Dr. Robson conducted with her children in 1993 and 1994.  On April 18, 1997, lawyers representing Dr. Kenneth Robson and the Institute of Living Medical Group, where Robson worked, prevented the release of these tapes.  Dr. Robson argued that the tapes should not be released because "Sessions with the minor children involved discussions of very sensitive issues, including grave allegations of sexual abuse by their father, Thomas Wilkinson."

Judge F. Herbert Barall then sealed the evidence that concretely substantiated the sexual abuse of Linda Wiegand's two children -- subjecting the boys to continued harm and abuse and possible death -- and protecting Dr. Kenneth Robson and others.

"Apparently, all of the professionals in Vermont... found [Linda] Wiegand to be sincere, reliable, and genuinely concerned about the welfare of her children," wrote CT investigator John Massameno after a detailed 18-month investigation in three states.  "There is no question that Wiegand became desperate after the Connecticut family court afforded her no hope of proving Dr. Robson wrong, appeared poised to follow Robson's recommendation of joint custody, and at a later, secret, ex parte meeting with Wilkinson's counsel, actually awarded physical and legal custody of both boys to Wilkinson's sister..."

The Massameno Report was also ordered sealed, courtesy of Judge F. Herbert Barall, and in February 2000 Enfield Superior Court Judge Nicola E. Rubinow issued gag orders forbidding anyone from publicly revealing information in the sealed report.  Many of the protective mothers in these cases suffer under similar gag orders, and reports and cases have been sealed to protect the interests of the professional involved in the judicial abuse.

Judge Herbert Barall also destroyed Linda Wiegand financially.  Besides taking Linda Wiegand's house, she was also was ordered to pay Wilkinson's counsel fees of $50,000 and a lump sum alimony of $500,000.  The family court considered such an award appropriate given Linda Wiegand's 'intolerable cruelty' in "subjecting [Wilkinson] to false allegations of sexual abuse." The courts 'finding' of no abuse was apparently based wholly on the opinion and report of Dr. Kenneth Robson.

Holly Collins and Linda Wiegand came to believe they had to take their children and run.  A 'fugitive from justice' wanted by the FBI, Linda Wiegand is actually a fugitive from the injustice of Family Courts in Connecticut.  The psychologist and custody evaluator in the Wiegand case, Dr. Kenneth Robson, is the one who helped take Max Liberti from Sunny Kelley and deliver him to the abusive father, just as he has done in unknown numbers of other cases.

2011- Newtown needs a new ordinance to establish molester-free zones:

http://www.newtown-ct.gov/public_docume ... textPage=1

Town of Newtown, CT
   
3 Primrose Street, Newtown, CT 06470
Child Protection Zones
   
 Chapter 118. CHILD PROTECTION  



[HISTORY: Adopted by the Legislative Council of the Town of Newtown 7-6-2011. Amendments noted where applicable.]


§ 118-1. Purpose.  

Since the Town of Newtown has a compelling interest in protecting children from the threat of sexual abuse from child sex offenders, it is hereby resolved that, to preserve and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the children of the Town, it is in the common interest to enact reasonable regulations restricting child sex offenders from entering Child Safety Zones.
 § 118-2. Definitions.  

As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: CHILD SAFETY ZONE


A. Any park, school, playground, recreation center, bathing beach, swimming pool or wading pool, gymnasium, sports field, trail, passive recreation area, open space parcel, or sports facility, which:



(1) Is under the jurisdiction of any department, agency or authority of the Town, including, but not limited to, the Board of Education of the Town of Newtown;

(2) Is leased by the Town to another person for the purpose of operating a park, school, playground, recreation center, bathing beach, swimming pool or wading pool, gymnasium, sports field, trail, passive recreation area, open space parcel, or sports facility;



B. "Child Safety Zone" includes any and all buildings, land, parking area or other improvements located on the same parcel on which each of the aforementioned facilities is located, but does not include any public street or public sidewalk located on the outside boundary of Child Safety Zones.

CHILD SEX OFFENDER


A. A person who has been convicted or found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect of a "criminal offense against a victim who is a minor"; a "nonviolent sexual offense"; a "sexually violent offense"; any felony that the court finds was committed for a "sexual purpose," as those terms are defined in Subdivisions (2), (5), (11) and (12) of Section 54-250 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended, and who is required to register with the Commissioner of Public Safety pursuant to Section 54-251, 54-252, 54-253 or 54-254 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended.

B. A person who has been convicted or found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect in any other state, in a federal or military court or in any foreign jurisdiction of any crime the essential elements of which are substantially the same as any of the crimes specified in Subdivisions (2), (5), and (11) of Section 54-251 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended, and which requires registration as a sexual offender in such other state or in the federal or military system, and who resides in this state on and after October 1, 1998.


 § 118-3. Prohibition.  

It shall be unlawful for a child sex offender to be present in a Child Safety Zone.
 § 118-4. Exceptions.  

This chapter will not apply to the following:

A. Any person whose name has been removed from the Connecticut Department of Public Safety's Sex Offender Registry or from the registry of any other state or in the federal or military system by act of a court or by expiration of the term such person is required to remain on such registry.

B. Any person entering into a facility in a Child Safety Zone for the sole purpose of voting in any municipal, state or federal election or referendum, provided that the person leaves the facility immediately after voting.

C. To the extent that the conduct prohibited by this chapter is in conflict with any sentence or order of probation or parole imposed upon a sex offender.

D. Any person who enters a Child Safety Zone for the purposes of dropping off or picking up his or her own child, provided that the person leaves the Child Safety Zone immediately after dropping off or picking up his or her child.

E. Any person who enters a Child Safety Zone for the purpose of meeting with an adult, such as a teacher, administrator or nurse, to discuss his or her own child's medical or educational issues, provided that the person leaves the Child Safety Zone immediately after completing the meeting or discussion.


 § 118-5. Notice.  

The Chief of Police or his/her designee shall make reasonable efforts to provide prompt, actual written notice of the enactment of this chapter (which notice shall contain a copy of the chapter) to all persons who are listed on the Sex Offender Registry as of the effective date of this chapter as well as those persons who are added to the Sex Offender Registry thereafter, which persons' addresses (as shown on the Sex Offender Registry) are within the Town. Such notice requirement may be satisfied by the mailing of such notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the last known address of such person as listed on the Sex Offender Registry or as otherwise known to the Chief of Police. The failure of any person to receive such actual written notice shall not be a defense to a violation of this chapter.
 § 118-6. Enforcement; penalties for offenses.  



A. If a police officer reasonably believes that a child sex offender is in a Child Safety Zone in violation of this chapter, the officer shall require the suspected child sex offender to provide his/her name, address and telephone number. If it is established that the individual is a child sex offender, then the officer may issue an infraction ticket to the offender and require the offender to leave the Child Safety Zone.

B. Any person in violation of this chapter shall be fined in the amount of $250 for each violation or the maximum imposed by state statute.


 § 118-7. Child Safety Zones.  

Each Child Safety Zone shall be identified by a sign conspicuously posted at the primary entrance to the Child Safety Zone and any building within the Child Safety Zone. In addition, the Town of Newtown will make available a map outlining each Child Safety Zone in Newtown and a document listing each Child Safety Zone at the First Selectman's Office and the Newtown Police Department. All Child Safety Zones similar to the map mentioned above and the document listing each Child Safety Zone in Newtown will be placed on the Town of Newtown's web site for viewing.
 § 118-8. Registry.  



A. The Newtown Police Department will maintain a sexual offender registration book of Newtown sexual offender registrants. It should be known as the "Newtown Sexual Offender Registry" (Registry).

B. The Newtown Sexual Offender Registry will be available for public view and shall be kept in the records area. Upon request by an individual present at the Newtown Police Department, the Registry shall be made available for viewing. The Town will not make copies of any part of the Registry; specific Registry information shall not be given out over the phone.

C. Although the Connecticut Department of Public Safety by Connecticut General Statute is responsible for maintaining the Sex Offender Registry, the Newtown Police Department will still be required to maintain a copy of the registration information for all registrants residing within its jurisdiction in the Newtown Sexual Offender Registry.

D. When a local registrant is released from the obligation to register, the Connecticut Department of Public Safety shall notify the Newtown Police Department that the person is no longer a registrant. The Newtown Police Department shall then remove and destroy all Registry information pertaining to the person and shall make no further disclosure of such information.

http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/loca ... nder-.html

Pedophilia is "Human Nature," Sex Offender Says
By Amy Parmenter
|  Monday, Jun 1, 2009  |

Before Jeffrey Brisson, 30, was sentenced Friday to 45 years in prison and 25 years of special parole for the sexual assault of children who had been placed in his care, he defended pedophilia as "human nature" and railed against a society he said just does not understand.

He read calmly from what appeared to be a prepared statement and said our culture refuses to acknowledge that everyone has deep-seeded feelings of pedophilia and lust for children.

Most people fantasize about having sex with children, he said, further defending his actions by mentioning child beauty pageants.

He continued to argue about the "ignorance of the system that legislates human nature."

The judge said that should Brisson ever be free, he would have to be monitored almost constantly. He will also be on the sex-offender registry.

In our society, we have a responsibility to children to nurture and protect them and not engage in adult behavior before an adult age, the judge said.

Brisson and his roommate, Harold Spurling, became the target of an investigation in 2008, when middle school officials received a "tip" that "pedophiles" were operating nearby, according to the New Britain Herald.

In January 2008, police found evidence in the men's New Britain apartment that they sexually assaulted several victims, police said.  

The youngest victim was 3-months-old, police said. The oldest was a 14-year-old, who police said had been the men's victim for eight years, according to the Herald.

As police searched the apartment in January, they found evidence, including hard drives and memory cards with graphic pictures of children in the apartment and home videos of acts performed on children, police said.

In March 2008, police added 140 counts to the charges.

Brisson pleaded guilty in March to several counts of first-degree sexual assault and three counts of risk of injury to a minor.

Spurling, who also faces 60 related charges, rejected a plea deal in March is and scheduled to go to trial.

http://antipaedo.wordpress.com/category ... -spurling/

[Michael K.]

Sandy Hook victim Emilie Parker


Sandy Hook victim Vicki Soto (right)

http://ctpcsw.com/connecticuts-prostitution-problem/

Connecticut's Prostitution Problem

The Hartford Advocate – by Gregory B. Hladky

6/7/2011

As you read these words, it's a safe bet that somewhere in Connecticut a young teenage girl is being forced to have sex with a stranger who paid to use her body.

She may be as young as 12. She may be hooked on drugs, or brutally battered if she refuses her pimp's demands. She may have been sold into the sexual trade by a member of her own family. She may have run away from home, or been lured by some manipulative bastard expert at spotting an emotionally vulnerable child. If she's blond and blue-eyed, she's twice as saleable as a young African American or Hispanic girl.

"It's everywhere," Assistant U.S. Attorney Krishna Patel, who works in the U.S. Department of Justice's criminal division in this state, says of the sexual slavery of young women. "It's all over Connecticut ... from the southern part of the state to the northern part. It's all across the board."

Connecticut's participation in the allied horrors of human trafficking and America's domestic prostitution industry was recently highlighted by a Vanity Fair article and a newly published book, The Berlin Turnpike, that both focused on a 2007 trial of a Hartford-area pimp named Dennis Paris.

The trial detailed a nightmare of sexual exploitation of young girls, beatings, death threats, drugs, pimp-paid sex ads in alternative newspapers like the Hartford Advocate or on the Internet.

It ended with Paris being convicted on all 21 federal charges and being sentenced to 30 years in prison.

National and state experts in human trafficking are quick to point out that neither Hartford nor Connecticut is unique.

People often think of sex trafficking as an international issue, with girls from Asia or Eastern Europe being brought to this country to work in brothels, says Teresa Younger, chair of Connecticut's Trafficking in Persons Council. "It's just as much a domestic problem ... with American girls being trafficked into the sex trade."

(Younger adds, however, that "Connecticut is a prime location" for the sex trade because of the three interstate highways running through the state and its proximity to Boston and New York City. "It makes it very easy for women to get brought into this state for the sex trade," Younger says.)

One U.S. Department of Justice research project estimated that more than 250,000 American kids ages 10-17 are involved each year in "commercial sexual exploitation" ranging from child pornography to prostitution. According to congressional testimony last November, the researchers believe one-third of all street-level prostitutes are under age 18 and that at least half of "off-street" prostitutes are legally classed as children.

The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children reported that the average entry age into the sex trade is 12-14 for girls and 11-13 for boys.

Estimates by different experts for the number of teens actively working as prostitutes ranges from 100,000 to 300,000, and there are federal and state officials who think those numbers are absurdly low.

Shaleen Silva is head of a nonprofit organization called the Paul and Lisa Program that has been working for 40 years to help women and children victimized by prostitution. She says Connecticut is one of a handful of states that have recently begun trying to track the actual numbers of kids involved in human trafficking and the sex trade.

Silva believes that, once hard data starts to be developed, "These numbers are going to start sky-rocketing."

Patel, who prosecuted the Paris trial and a slew of other child prostitution cases in Connecticut, agrees.

"I feel like there's a complete tidal wave coming at us," Patel says.

When Patel came to this state from New York in 2003, law enforcement types here told her that human trafficking and child prostitution "really wasn't happening here in Connecticut."

"This is such a clandestine crime," Patel explains, "one that's so hard to bring to the surface."

State Superior Court Judge Raymond Norko, who runs Hartford's Community Court and routinely deals with prostitution arrests in the city, says human trafficking and child sex slavery is "a problem simmering below society's radar."

One reason is that the young girls lured, forced or drugged into prostitution only rarely show up soliciting johns on the streets.

Norko says the average age of Hartford street prostitutes brought into his court is 44. The average fee for a sex act from a street-level prostitute is $20.

Pimps using young girls often charge higher fees, using ads to connect with johns and setting up assignations in local motels or hotels. These sophisticated operations often employ drivers to take girls from one sex job to the next, leaving the pimp insulated from direct involvement.

It becomes much more difficult for law enforcement to make arrests and prosecutions "become much more complicated," Norko says.

Patel says young girls often bond with their pimps, or that the "fear factor is so high" that they refuse to complain to authorities. Police and prosecutors often have a minor picked up on prostitution charges "screaming at you for taking her away from her pimp."

[youtube:ayplukqd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuomX1ZRW28[/youtube]ayplukqd]

Uploaded on Feb 22, 2012

Linda Wiegand's children were subjected to Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) testifies in public to how the Government stole all her properties and ruined her life when she tried to help her kids. If, after watching this video, the viewer is not convinced that SRA exists at high level of society nothing will, no matter how much proof.

http://www.satanservice.org/theory/coscm.txt

What is the Church of Satan and How Do I Get Involved?
   
   The Church of Satan was founded by Dr. Anton Szandor LaVey, April 30th
   1966 c.e. It was the first church based on the celebration of carnal
   indulgences and pursuit of material happiness and success. (In
   contrast to "spiritual enlightenment" and union with "God"). It was
   literally meant as an eye-opener for those who would choose to cast
   out false morality and blind faith, so to see with their own eyes and
   think with their own minds, so that the human race could grow more
   aware of itself rather than being clouded in self-righteous,
   hypocritical deceit.
   
   Satanists are driven to be leaders;  they are strong and ambitious
   individuals who are masters of the world and of themselves.  Our
   movement will enlighten those who act as predators, seeking material
   rewards and victories as their needs meet.  Likewise, it will leave
   passive, non-thinkers to be enslaved in an increasingly demanding
   world that they would naturally have to face regardlessly.
   
   We do not favor trends or popular fanaticism because we can observe
   for ourselves how those who partake in such behaviors are constantly
   proven to fall into a mediocre category; always needing to be given
   detailed instructions on how they should conduct themselves and how to
   think.  Television is their God. Satanists are above that.  We
   represent the minority of free-thinkers and innovators who constantly
   pop-up in history as leaders, inventors, and "wise-men" of their time.
   
   
   Obviously there are many calling themselves Satanists these days who
   cannot and will not ever meet this standard.  Satanism is a religion
   enshrouded in mystery, and the arcane aspects of it are indeed to our
   advantage.  However, this sparks a temptation many times in the worst
   candidates for our elitist movement, a temptation to try joining our
   ranks and then consequently suffering their own folly while thinking
   that they are receiving worthwhile attention.  One of the most
   unmistakable ways to recognize a pseudo-Satanist is that they commonly
   make a self-initiated claim to the position of "Priest", "Magister" or
   "Magus" long before the subject is suited or capable of handling such
   a role.  These labels represent a high-rank within our meritocracy,
   and they cannot be misused. The pseudo-Satanist will aspire to this
   position usually without any experience, credentials, reputation or
   talent.  A real Satanist doesn't concern himself with becoming a
   Priest.  A real Satanist pursues happiness and success, and if they
   are fortunate enough to be ordained by the Church of Satan, then so be
   it.  Other wise, there are many other achievements to aspire to in
   life and Satanists in various occupations are just as respected for
   their own victories.
   
   The Church of Satan was, is, and will always be the first above-ground
   organization ever established in the name of a religion called
   Satanism.  It is advisable to check with any resources or persons what
   their feelings are for the Church of Satan and the work of Anton LaVey
   before accepting their authority.  There is more inaccurate
   information on the internet, and in other resources, about Satanism
   than there is accurate information, and that is probably going to
   remain a reality for a while, until real Satanists have achieved
   enough momentum to overpower the reign of falsities, as we most
   certainly will. Since we let everyone stand or fall on their own
   merit, we don't get directly in their way. However, we do not tolerate
   unqualified, self-ordained spokespersons and never will, so this
   information is an important way of filtering them out.  Real Satanists
   will never become the majority.  This is not a world with many leaders
   and only a couple of followers. Nature's ineffable logic has never
   made it that way for quite valid reasons.
   
   The principles of the Satanic Bible, and the Satanic movement of the
   Church of Satan DO NOT condone:  neo-nazism, racism, child sacrifice,
   animal sacrifice, child molestation, mandatory sex orgies, kidnapping,
   or illegal drugs. All of these things either consist of or are in
   themselves exemplatory of compulsive, irrational behavior which is not
   desirable for the healthy lifestyle of Satanism. Let Christians who
   don't know what to do with themselves out of abnormal self-denial and
   neurosis abuse their altar boys - we don't need them anymore!
   
   Church of Satan: PO Box 210666 San Francisco, CA 94121
   
   If you would like to recieve an official information packet on our
  Church of Satan outpost in Connecticut, (AKA Church of Tiamat) or if
   you have questions, write to:
   
    Curtis M. LeBlanc [zdervish@gnn.com]
   
   PO Box 3184 Newtown, CT 06470

[Michael K.]

2wsk79g8]

Adam Lanza Has Not Exist For The Last 3 Years No Record Non Existent

2wsk79g8]

Adam Lanza 2 Different Stories





http://www.futuremovies.co.uk/review.asp?ID=21

L.I.E Movie Review


L.I.E is a film that you can't trust: what do I mean by this? I will explain below. L.I.E is in one way a disturbing, ambiguous and important attempt to broach the taboo, yet very topical, subject of paedophilia with sensitivity and without exploitation or hysteria. On the other hand it can also be viewed as a somewhat warped coming-of-age drama; charting the difficulties young Howie Blitzer (Paul Franklin Dano) faces in simultaneously coping with the peculiarities of puberty on top of becoming increasingly estranged from his corrupt businessman father (Bruce Altman) and recently losing his mother in a road accident. Whichever way you perceive "LIE" (and it is a film that will evoke strong and contrasting opinions regarding its content) the events and images contained within resonate deeply and lastingly in the memory.

The title acronym refers to the Long Island Expressway, a motorway that connects the leafy suburbs of Long Island with New York City. The road has a specific morbid relevance to Howie; it's where his mother was killed, and its concrete expanses hold both repulsion and fascination for him. He seems to be constantly drawn there through one reason or another. In one particularly powerful scene that is repeated during the film, we see Howie balancing on the railings of an overpass as the rat race continues on below completely oblivious to his anguish.

Howie's young existence is in terminal freefall as the events of the film begin to unfold. In the opening exchanges we see that his self-absorbed father is paying less attention to him with each passing day, he is having difficulties at school and he is becoming more and more embroiled in an introspective world. Howies' sterile home offers him little but material comfort and he becomes charmed into bouts of juvenile delinquency by Gary (Billy Kay) an older, more streetwise boy. Eventually, in the aftermath of a botched petty burglary, Howie meets "Big John" [B.J.] (Brian Cox), at which point his problems become compounded, and the audience begin to shift uncomfortably in their seats.

This is where the film becomes extremely intricate and somewhat unsettling. It deliberately sets up a trap to ensnare the viewer into uncharted waters of ambiguity, making a number of very serious points about the issues of paedophilia and the cinematic concerns relating to audience/character identification, spectatorship and voyeurism.

Howies' relationship with Big John is highly problematic; we are allowed glimpses into John's world that signify the sort of man he is, and the sort of personal habits he prefers. Yet outwardly he is a charming, well-respected man in a small town, a genuine pillar of the community with lots of connections that cover up his dark habits. In this way the film plays around with perception, utilising a number of misleading turns at key moments to create a "will he/won't he" high wire act, that the viewer is forced to walk. Big John obviously has a sickening appetite for young boys, but his relationship with Howie is at times touching and heart warming. Sensing a rare intelligence in Howie, Big John encourages him to look beyond himself, and realise his dreams as a writer, to (ironically) get away from his current situation. Big John essentially takes the place of Howie's absent father: loving, supportive and encouraging. He is Howie's shoulder to cry on and the outlet for his inner demons. In these powerful scenes Big John is the delicate patriarch.

This ambivalence in Brian Cox's character (enhanced by his subtle portrayal) is exactly what makes the film interesting, and also hard to judge. On one level we see a friendship that grows between a young boy and an older man, one of equality and mutual understanding that brings them both moments of joy during difficult circumstances. On another level we see a sick paedophile; vociferous and unashamed in the pursuit of his latest young conquest, employing a variety of tactics in order to ensnare him like all the rest. The blurring of this distinction underpins the entire film, as the narrative snakes in one direction and then the other, and the films tries to make a valuable point about that paranoia and fear surrounds these issues in contemporary society: Can a grown man have a platonic relationship with a teenage boy in this day and age, or is it ALWAYS underpinned with sexual desire?

Technically, the film utilises a number of devices derived from documentary filmmaking. The scenes and locations are naturally lit, and the camera work is often hand held, centring in on faces in extreme close-up. Inevitable comparisons will be made to the films of Larry Clark ("Kids", "Bully") on the basis of the filmmaking style. Yet, Clarks' films are much more exploitative of the teenage condition and strive for little in the way of understanding, "LIE" is much more sensitive in its treatment of similar topics.

The teenage body is overtly sexualised, photographed as an object of desire and fascination. The camera lingers long on Howie's pre-pubescent body, especially from the point of view of the sexual predators in the film; firstly Gary and then Big John. The films' often disarming use of comedy is a jolting addition to the material, and you often catch yourself laughing during moments of extreme tension, often as a release. Many of the best comedy lines are reserved for Big John, who is possessed of a dry, deadpan wit, which adds to his aura as a complicated enigma, and possibly enhances the viewers' sense of complicity with this figure we are supposed to revile.

A film with a lot of serious points to make, "L.I.E" doesn't set out to moralise, preach or shock unduly and at no point does the material ever become exploitative or gratuitous. The performances are exemplary, and the interplay between Paul Franklin Dano and Brian Cox is, at times, spellbinding. The audience is gripped in a perpetual state of nervous anticipation in every scene they share. The naivety and helplessness that Howie displays juxtaposed with Big John's sinister, but at times delicate and fragile, presence lurking in the shadows and leafy avenues is what really binds the entire film together. Disturbing, touching and ultimately full of hope, "L.I.E" is imperfect, yet thought provoking cinema. Brave enough to tackle and expose a contemporary problem without drawing concrete or hysterical conclusions, it lets the audience make its own mind up. A rare privilege.

The only thing separating Long Island from Connecticut is Long Island Sound, a body of water at most twenty miles wide.

[Michael K.]

uw1yhkkm]

NEWTOWN CT NOT A CHURCH OF SATAN OUTPOST - YouTube [but it was]

uw1yhkkm]

UN-EDITED Warning from State Police Spokesman