Transexuals Commit Shocking Murders in Maine

Started by Michael K., August 23, 2015, 12:30:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Michael K.

I for one am sick of what I see when I am regularly exposed to transexual advocacy in the media and in education.  And as unfortunate as it is to see stories about the latest transwoman being killed, the media does not depict on balance anything of the malice surrounding some of these dark souls. 

What are transexuals really?  Are they just out of touch with reality?  How is it that they attract all manner of evil to themselves with their lifestyles?  How is it that anyone can believe that the desire to be surgically mutilated in connection with perverted sex can ever be normal or good? 

Here are two stories from my home state that demonstrate that the connection between sexual dysfunction and the use of blades doesn't necessarily produce liberating "fabulousness".

Remember that these people are not considered crazy, so that only leaves evil as the word to decribe their twisted minds.  Also notice that the victims of both the male and female transverts were women.  Why I think this is so, is because women are naturally born with the most God-given sexual power, and they are objects of envy and the twisted need to control that power amongst the sexually perverted.

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!"(Isaiah 5:20):

http://m.seacoastonline.com/article/20040812/News/308129968

QuoteProsecutors: Murder suspect not insane
By Associated Press
Posted Aug 12, 2004 at 2:00 AM
Updated Dec 18, 2010 at 9:16 AM

ALFRED, Maine — Prosecutors told jurors Tuesday that a Massachusetts man on trial for murder is faking some of his mental illnesses and is not legally insane.

Walter Moore, 43, of Salem, Mass., has pleaded innocent by reason of insanity to the murder of Connie Gagliardi ,41, whose body was found by a bow hunter in the Rachel Carson Refuge in Saco on Sept. 7, 2002. She was tied between two trees with her wrists and throat cut.

In his opening statement, Assistant Attorney General Andrew Benson did not dispute that Moore has "a number of personality disorders," but maintained that he is not insane. Moore has said that Gagliardi, who was also from Salem, wanted to commit suicide and asked for his help.

"Even if that's true," Benson said, "it's not a defense to the crime of murder."

Defense attorney Joel Vincent urged the jury to keep "an open mind about the evidence as you hear it" and not let the "inflammatory nature" of the murder sway their deliberations.

"(Moore) asks for one thing - a fair trial," said Vincent. "A fair trial means you're going to listen to the evidence."

Police have said Moore was a transient whom Gagliardi took in. Police believe they traveled to Maine together and that Gagliardi was murdered sometime on Sept. 4. Moore stayed at an Old Orchard Beach motel that night and returned to Massachusetts on the Amtrak Downeaster train the next day.

Two witnesses testified that Moore talked to them on the train ride and that they had no difficulty understanding him and he had no problem carrying on a conversation.

Police in Salem were contacted later by a man and woman concerned about Gagliardi's whereabouts. Detective Brian Gilligan of the Salem Police went to Gagliardi's apartment and found Moore, who was packing his belongings.

Also Tuesday, forensic experts with the Maine State Police Crime Laboratory linked evidence found at the crime scene to Moore, including a rope that was used to tie one of Gagliardi's wrists. DNA samples matching Gagliardi were also found on a pair of sweatpants that police found among Moore's belongings.

Gagliardi allegedly let Moore, who also goes by the name "Red Feather," stay in her room in a boarding house. However, there are no allegations the two had been lovers because Moore is a transsexual awaiting an operation to become a woman, the Boston Globe reported at the time.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2004/08/12/guilty_plea_ends_slay_trial/?camp=pm

QuoteGuilty plea ends slay trial
By Associated Press  |  August 12, 2004

ALFRED, Maine -- A Massachusetts man pleaded guilty during his trial yesterday to killing a woman by tying her between two trees and cutting her wrists and throat...

Moore had pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, but he decided to change his plea after listening in court early yesterday to a tape of himself confessing to police after his arrest.


http://www.pressherald.com/2015/08/20/supermarket-where-fatal-stabbing-took-place-reopens/

Transexual Dyke Horrific Slashing of Old Lady

QuoteSACO — The suspect charged in the fatal stabbing of a Saco woman in a supermarket Wednesday had been planning the random attack for a month, according to court documents.

Connor MacCalister, 31, of Saco, was "angry with life" and "wanted to get back at someone," Maine State Police Detective Kristopher Kennedy wrote in the complaint formally charging MacCalister with the murder of Wendy Boudreau, a 59-year-old mother and grandmother.


Police initially identified MacCalister as a woman, but MacCalister's brother, Jeremey Hopkins, told the Press Herald that MacCalister is a female-to-male transgender and has identified as a man for more than a decade.

MacCalister was being held at the York County Jail in Alfred until his initial court appearance, which is scheduled for Friday afternoon.

York County Sheriff William King Jr. said late Thursday afternoon he was still trying to determine whether to house MacCalister with male or female inmates. He was in a single cell as of early Thursday evening. The state has filed a motion seeking a psychological evaluation for MacCalister.

The criminal complaint filed Thursday in York County Superior Court outlined the chilling details of Wednesday's attack.

Kennedy wrote that MacCalister went to the Shaw's Supermarket with plans to kill several people and wanted to target an elderly woman who wouldn't resist.

Police said MacCalister saw Boudreau in the parking lot and followed her into the store. In the ice cream aisle, he grabbed Boudreau from behind and slit the woman's throat, Kennedy wrote.


Others in the store then responded to screams.

Alexandra Gogos, who works in the Shaw's bakery, ran to the scene and tried to stop Boudreau's bleeding. Gogos asked MacCalister, "Why. Why did you do this?"

MacCalister replied, "She looked at me funny."

Another witness who responded to Boudreau's screams, Benjamin Williams, also asked MacCalister, "Why?"

"I'm off my meds," he said. "She looked at me wrong."

Kennedy said MacCalister confessed to the crime in an interview with police.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3047492/School-fire-reading-transgender-children-s-book-kindergarteners-without-telling-parents.html

QuoteOfficials at an elementary school in Maine have come under fire for teaching students about transgender issues without first seeking the approval of parents.

During a lesson on tolerance and acceptance, children at Horace Mitchell Primary School in Kittery Point were read I Am Jazz, a book about a child 'with a boy's body and a girl's brain' who eventually finds a doctor that tells the family the boy is a transgender.

I have an idea, maybe the little boy's brain is almost the same as a little girl's brain until puberty, and this little boy really loves girls, maybe even envying them, but can't understand what adult sexuality is really about.  Kids that age believe in Santa, The Tooth Fairy and Mr. President, so they aren't rational or experienced enough to understand transexualism as a social phenomenon or whether they are one.  Why can't this frigging doctor let this kid grow up into a man first, and then try and assess the situation.  Isn't this doctor molesting the kid by imposing mature, perverted, sexually active roles at such a young age?  I mean, I am sure a little kid wants to get attention and please authority figures.

JohnM

I respectfully disagree with the 'evil' assertion. That kind of talk is a turnoff to your point, that people can have a reasonable conversation about. Transgender people are mostly unhappy people. It was a very rational and educated opinion by the doctor who commented that pseudo-sexual organ surgical alterations, and chemical hormone injections, do not produce happiness. That there is an underlying unhalppiness that continues to exist, regardless of the gender. That these people last through much shorter, less fullfilled existences. It is as logical and appropriate a prescription for happiness, as Freud's cocaine he prescribed to patients.

The same corrupt people are behind it. The same mentality, the same true disease. Judaism.

Michael K.

#2
I err in ascribing malicious evil to all such people, what I meant to indicate was the evil inherint in the people who have been involved in these murder scenes, either through attracting it to themselves or doing it. There is a material standard of evil in those cases, not a broad moral speculation.  Otherwise, the same thing you see wrong in proscribed materialistic happiness is what I would term another type of evil, but more subtle and it is a value judgment I make.  I can't call it good even if dragged by wild horses, though.

But I certainly don't object to being called out for making a personal value judgment that impairs the rational conversation, if that's what it does for you.  I will try to tone it down a bit, thanks.

Note:  It occurred to me that the name Jazz is most likely a gay culture reference, and blasphemous in the extreme, if the boy's tranny name means "Jaz-izz", as in a gay, SanFrancisco idiomatic," Jesus".  That's just so perverted.  I wonder if the (likely Jew) doctor sold Jazz on getting girl hormones and getting castrated before puberty, so he could be a more perfect sexual experiment and more desirable as a sex object.

JohnM

#3
And, to (back) your point, the whole idea of the thing is revolting. It had first sounded like you were making an unhinged moral judgement. Me and my bias. Evil as in 'not healthy', is how it is, originally indicating. So often today (almost exclusively), the term is slung about frequently as 'against God'. Without grounding to substance. Here, in your post, I can see how it's used. Thank you for the clarification.