D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Election Bombshell Already Online

[rmstock]

Deborah Jeane Palfrey, left, is pictured with Montgomery Blair Sibley outside the U.S. District Court in Washington on September 7, 2007.
D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Election Bombshell Already Online
Montgomery Blair Sibley says a timer controls release of a link to
client records 'relevant' to presidential race.

By Steven Nelson March 31, 2016, at 1:42 p.m.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-31/dc-madams-attorney-says-election-bombshell-already-online

  "The colorful litigator who represented the late "D.C. madam" Deborah
   Palfrey and threatened this week to release call logs of his former
   client that he says are "very relevant" to the 2016 presidential
   election tells U.S. News those records already are digitized and posted
   online.
   
   Montgomery Blair Sibley says the records will become public if he fails
   to reset a 72-hour countdown clock, which could cut short his soft
   two-week ultimatum for federal courts to consider lifting a 2007 gag
   order that covers the records, lest he deem that order void.
   
   The countdown clock is a safeguard, Sibley says, that ensures that if
   he disappears the records will be published. Inevitable release, he
   says, may also disincentivize violent acts against him to prevent their
   disclosure.
   
   The records are stored on four servers around the world, Sibley says,
   and dozens of reporters will receive a website link if the clock is not
   reset. He says he loaded the information online in January, when he
   decided to publicly claim the records are relevant to the presidential
   race.   
   
   
   RELATED CONTENT
   D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Call Log Bombshell Could Upend Presidential Race
   
   "There's a link right now, that if you had, you would have access to
   the records," Sibley says about the website. "If I die, disappear,
   whatever, they will be out."
   
   A similar tactic was embraced by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in
   2010 with release of an encrypted "insurance" file that could be
   unlocked with a password if the besieged transparency advocate chose to
   distribute it.
   
   "If you're asking if I'm partnering with WikiLeaks, the answer is I'm
   not answering that," Sibley says without any prodding about the
   secrets-spilling site.
   
   Sibley says his website hosts PDFs of Palfrey call logs that contain
   about 5,000 phone numbers, along with downloadable spreadsheets that
   contain the names and addresses of 815 Verizon Wireless customers from
   those logs, which he acquired with a subpoena ahead of Palfrey's trial.
   
   Sibley represented Palfrey after her 2006 arrest for running an escort
   service popular among Washington's upper class. In 2007, he released
   call logs containing about 10,000 phone numbers, which resulted in the
   outing of prominent political leaders including Sen. David Vitter,
   R-La. He says he held back 5,000 numbers for leverage at trial – but
   Palfrey fired him before she was found guilty in April 2008 of money
   laundering and other crimes.
   
   Two weeks after her conviction, Palfrey was found in her mother's shed
   with a nylon rope around her neck, dead from apparent suicide.
   
   A major hurdle for Sibley's bid to modify the 2007 court order
   protecting the records is that Palfrey fired him.
   
   [FLASHBACK: 'Pro-Life' Congressman Who Urged Abortions for Ex-Wife and Mistress Will Run Again]

    Then-U.S. District Judge Richard Roberts in January instructed a clerk
   not to accept Sibley's motion requesting reconsideration of the
   restraining order, writing: "Why Sibley would have possession of
   subpoenaed records in a case from which he has been terminated and why
   he would not instead have turned all copies of them over to the
   defendant's continuing counsel of record is not set forth in the
   motion."
   
   Sibley says Roberts – who resigned earlier this month on the day he was
   sued for alleged sexual assault – wrongly assumed he had no right to
   the records. He says he was retained for Palfrey's appeal, was her
   mother's attorney at the time of Palfrey's death and that he worked for
   a while on a civil lawsuit.
   
   He also says he delivered original copies of all records to attorney
   Preston Burton, who represented Palfrey at trial and, Sibley says,
   later replaced him on the civil lawsuit.
   
   Thus far, Sibley has not heard back from the D.C. Circuit federal
   appeals court or from the Supreme Court, which he asked on Monday to
   force the District Court to accept his motion about the records. He
   said Monday he would wait two weeks for courts to act, but now says the
   situation is so fluid the time frame may change.
   
   [LISTEN: Sexual Audio Released After Alabama Governor Denies Affair]
   
    Burton did not respond to an email seeking comment on the records.
   Sibley says he currently has no physical copies.
   
   Matthew Green, a computer science professor at Johns Hopkins
   University, says it's unclear to him how secure Sibley's unadvertised
   website is from prying eyes.
   
   "Wow, that sounds a little crazy," Green says in an email. "I'm not
   sure if there are any services that do this reliably – you would have
   to cobble something together. Is the information safe sitting on four
   servers? I guess it depends on which four servers. Presumably Google is
   safer than some random server sitting in a closet somewhere. But it
   doesn't sound very safe to me."
   
   Green says if Sibley is partnering with WikiLeaks, there would be a
   different set of considerations.
   
   
   RELATED CONTENT
   Alabama Governor Accused of Adultery as Three Scandals Collide
   
    "Wikileaks does have some security expertise, so it's probably more
   secure against random hackers," he says. "On the other hand, Wikileaks
   has some fairly sophisticated adversaries, including nation states – so
   their server infrastructure has a much bigger target on it. But the
   real question is: if Wikileaks has the data, can you trust Wikileaks
   not to do anything with it?"
   
   Sibley has refused to provide any clues about what information relevant
   to the presidential election he claims to have. He says he's not
   concerned that some citizens are incorrectly guessing about one of the
   five remaining candidates in the Democratic and Republican primaries.
   
    Sibley says he currently is not licensed to practice law – the result
   of a 2008 suspension in Florida for filing "vexatious and meritless"
   lawsuits against judges and for a child support payment dispute, for
   which he faced reciprocal discipline in D.C. – and has no plans to seek
   readmission to the D.C. Bar.
   
   "I have no desire to be part of a profession I consider to be
   profoundly corrupt to its core," he says. "I'm hacking at the roots of
   tyranny, not its branches."
   
   

   D.C. Madam's Attorney Says His Information Could Affect 2016 Election
   Inside Edition   
     "Former attorney of the "D.C. Madam" claims there is a bombshell that
      could change the course of the 2016 presidential election. Montgomery
      Blair Sibley, who represented madam Deborah Jean Palfrey, posted a
      video on a GoFundMe page trying to raise money for a court battle to
      release her business records. Palfrey committed suicide in 2008. So far
      he's collected $390. The "D.C. Madam" was a national scandal in 2007
      and she was convicted of running a high-end escort service in the
      nation's capital."
     
   
   Steven Nelson is a reporter at U.S. News & World Report. You can follow  him on Twitter or reach
   him at snelson@usnews.com. "

Shortly after publishing this report Nelson was pulled of the D.C. Madam dossier,
and ordered to report a rally at the White House for legalized pot. (See his Twitter).
The folks from TRP have additional details :
http://www.therightperspective.org/2016/04/01/has-anonymous-dropped-ted-cruz-dc-madam-phone-dox/
Wayne Madsen, without doubt the D.C. Madam Expert, has his news page of which i made a snapshot :

waynemadsenreport dot com/categories/20130101_1  archived at 3 Apr 2016 16:04:27 UTC
http://archive.is/3a0Fm

This looks like a mad cap world series final in baseball, where all bases are
double filled in the  second last inning. Here's MSNBC :

CRUZ WHY IS YOUR NUMBER ON THE LIST OF D.C. MADAM?
April 1, 2016 Dianne Marshall
https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2016/04/01/cruz-why-is-your-number-on-the-list-of-d-c-madam/

[Ognir]

we already have the numbers
just need the matching names

https://cryptome.org/dc-madam.zip

[rmstock]

[pdf]https://rmstock.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/att-january-21-2001-december-20-2001.pdf[/pdf]
https://rmstock.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/att-january-21-2001-december-20-2001.pdf

goto page 89 and further for the TX calls. The weekend after 9/11 seems to have been
the biggest party in D.C.