Rockefeller on Trump

[yankeedoodle]

Found this from James "Mel" Rockefeller.  Don't really know who he is, or if this is a pseudonym, or what it might really be about.  It contains a devastating amount of truth about Dog-crap Donnie.  Don't know where it's from, or by who, but is sure is TRUE.  What the motive for somebody with such a tremendous amount of knowledge to assemble this is...well, who knows?  It's called a "draft," and Yankee Doodle has seen it change from yesterday to today - some confusing things were removed - so who knows what it is about, or where it will go, but it sure is GOOD.

The Trump "election" confirms that Jewish elites and extremists have amassed enough control to pick presidential advisers able to shape U.S. foreign policy for the next fifty years.
     

 Thus my concern that the Trump presidency was produced not to Make America Great Again but to advance the interests of Greater Israel at the expense of America and Americans.
   

 Though this is clearly the Trump presidency, it would be wrong to describe it as "his" presidency. When Americans grasp how this presidency was produced—by whom and for whom—he will be remembered as the last president for Greater Israel.
   

With both houses of Congress in the hands of pro-Israeli Republicans, with pro-Israeli Democrats (such as Chuck Schumer) holding key positions in the Congress, and with a pliable asset in the White House advised by rightwing pro-Israelis, the Zionist vision of global domination by The Chosen is now seen by them as a real possibility.

   

     Donald Trump—The Last President for Greater Israel     
http://hiddentaxonhumanity.com/uncategorized/mel-rockefeller-commentary/mel-rockefeller-commentary/

by James M. ("Mel") Rockefeller with Jeff Gates

The pro-Israelis who produced the presidency of the dysfunctional George Bush to take us to war in Iraq also produced the presidency of narcissist Donald Trump—to take us to war in Iran. Were that not the case, the Trump transition team would not be dominated by rightwing pro-Israelis. Below I show how supporters of the Israeli Right delivered an Electoral College victory for a reality show host unaware who is manipulating his self-absorbed needs on behalf of Greater Israel.

As proven by my life experience as the son of Nelson Rockefeller (unknown except to a select few),[1] Jewish elites and extremists are the source of serial wars and crises dating to no later than 1850 when Rothschild-affiliate Hallgarten & Company investment bankers opened their Manhattan office to finance both sides in the Civil War.[2] A century later, my Uncle David Rockefeller razed Hallgarten's headquarters to build One Chase Manhattan Plaza. He also personally allied with these German-Jewish bankers from the same Hesse region as Leo Strauss,[3] a mentor to those who devastated our national security by deceiving us to invade Iraq, setting in motion the emergence of ISIS/ISIL. With the unlimited war powers now vested in the president, those who produced this presidency pose a threat not only to our national security but also to world peace.

Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, raised in an Orthodox Jewish home, may be the Eddie Jacobson of the Trump Presidency. After serving together in the same artillery unit during WWI, Jacobson and Harry Truman returned to Kansas City to open a haberdashery that soon failed. That's when the Pendergast component of organized crime began the production of Truman's political career. After the National Crime Syndicate was formed in 1929, Truman was "elected" to the Senate in 1934 where his career was groomed to ensure he became president on the death of President Franklin Roosevelt in April 1945. Truman and Roosevelt had spoken only twice prior to that fateful day.

Three years later, Zionist Chaim Weizmann appealed to Jacobson's Jewish identity to have him set a meeting with Truman. After assuring Truman that the Jewish state would not become the extremist enclave that it became, Weizmann induced this Zionist Christian President to recognize as a legitimate state an enclave of Jewish elites and extremists—over the strong objections of his Secretary of State George Marshall, the diplomatic corps, the C.I.A. and the Pentagon's Joint Chiefs who feared that Zionists would draw the U.S. into serial conflicts in the region—as they did.[4]

Our First Social Media "Election"

Jared Kushner oversaw the campaign's digital and social media strategies along with Steve Bannon, since named a senior White House strategist. In the 2016 presidential primaries, New York hedge fund manager Robert Mercer singlehandedly funded the campaign of Texas Senator Ted Cruz, an outspoken Zionist Christian advocate for Israel. When the Cruz campaign collapsed, Mercer shifted his support to Trump and to funding Cambridge Analytica, specialists in data mining and psychographic analysis as key to voter targeting.[5]

In the U.K., Cambridge Analytics (CA) identified "persuadable" voters to win a surprise June 2016 electoral victory for those who sought to see Britain exit the European Union (Brexit).[6] As with Trump, Brexit supporters declared the vote a "populist victory." In the U.S., CA Chief Executive Alexander Nix claimed in October 2016 that CA had collected "close to four or five thousand data points on every individual....So we model the personality of every adult across the United States, some 230 million people." Using general online data, Facebook "likes" and smartphone data, CA devised an individual psychological targeting system able to influence elections.

In 2014, CA was involved in a reported 44 federal and state-level elections, including the election of Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton, an outspoken critic of the nuclear accord with Iran. When Ted Cruz won the 2016 Iowa presidential caucuses, CA and its Mercer-funded "behavioral microtargeting" was credited with the win. CA has such confidence in its profiling system that it claims a capacity to detect aspects of a voter's personality not even known to the voter.

Its data mining relies on "onboarding"—the widely prevalent self-profiling undertaken voluntarily online, much of it on Facebook, plus consumer behavior reflected in Internet use (much of it on Google), online CA surveys and other sources, both public and private, largely without users' permission or knowledge. The use and abuse of these privately owned public spaces (aka "POPS") has transformed Facebook and Google into the "Private Superpowers" of the Information Age. Knowledge about social media users can be gleaned, assessed and, in effect, deployed as a form of psy-ops weaponry to shape decision-making by those profiled and targeted—without their knowledge—by ensuring that they (and only they) receive messages about issues they care about.

Those data points enable psychographic microtargeters to devise algorithms able to segment voter audiences so that political advertisements can be sent online as "dark posts" seen by no one but those targeted.[7] Thus, for instance, this individual psychological targeting selected Black voters in key electoral states to receive reminders that Hillary Clinton used "super predator" language offensive to Blacks. Online personality data informs both the content and tone of the messages sent, providing an "actionable view" of persuadable voting blocs in key electoral states. Instead of betting on broadcast media, this Mercer-funded, Mercer-advised, Mercer-coordinated campaign invested in narrowcast digital messaging, especially Facebook-enabled microtargeting.[8] Relying largely on a traditional media model, Clinton outspent Trump an estimated 3:1 on broad-brush messaging.[9]

The Mercers are described as a financial "patron saint" of the Bannon-run Breitbart News. They also funded (and largely own) Cambridge Analytica. With Bannon on the board, the firm was retained by the Trump campaign that, in turn, was supported by Mercer who also funded the Bannon-founded Government Accountability Institute, a nonprofit (with Rebekah Mercer a board member) that published Clinton Cash.[10] That book led the F.B.I. to reopen (and re-close) its email investigation during the last weeks of the Clinton campaign.[11] The Mercer Family Foundation also gave at least $3.5 million to the nonprofit Citizens United that sued to force the release of Clinton's emails.[12]

Following his "election," Trump changed his position on at least a half-dozen issues that motivated those microtargeted to vote for him.[13] The point, however, is not which issues he abandoned but those he did not: unflinching support for Israel, relocating the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, opposition to the nuclear accord with Iran and support for expanding Israeli settlements in the occupied territories—a Greater Israel stance certain to negate any possibility of a two-state solution.[14]

Pre-staging The Trump "Election"

Pro-Israel extremists inside the Trump Organization include general counsel Jason Greenblatt (a former settler), bankruptcy attorney David M. Friedman (a two-state opponent and pro-settler), special counsel Michael Cohen and key family members, including son-in-law Kushner and his wife Ivanka Trump who converted to Orthodox Judaism. Israeli settlers were heartened by a post-election interview that Greenblatt (described as a "foreign policy adviser") gave to Israel's Army Radio when he Trump did not view settlements as "an obstacle for peace." That statement led to several celebratory announcements in Israel proclaiming, "the era of the Palestinian state is over."[15]

Greenblatt lived in a settlement in Israel and wrote about serving as a sentry. In April 2016, Trump acknowledged he may appoint his chief lawyer as a Middle East envoy though Kushner is also seen as qualified. Kushner is a real estate developer and Greenblatt a real estate attorney. Neither have diplomatic experience. Nor does Friedman who Trump named Ambassador to Israel with Greenblatt his negotiator for international affairs. Friedman, who called President Obama an anti-Semite, wrote that he looked forward to moving the U.S. embassy to "Israel's eternal capital, Jerusalem." Friedman also described Jewish supporters of a two-state solution as "worse than the kapos," the Jews put in charge of Nazi concentration camps.[16] Friedman proposes Israeli annexation of the West Bank, a long contested area that he refers to as Judea and Samara.[17]

Following the December 15, 2016 announcement of his appointment, Friedman conceded that he and Trump negotiated that sensitive diplomatic position "months earlier."[18] The timing suggests that the deal Trump struck with Friedman and Greenblatt coincided with the June 20, 2016 firing of campaign manager Corey Lewandowski—as Trump plummeted in the polls—and the simultaneous hiring of Mercer-funded Cambridge Analytica along with senior campaign official Kellyanne Conway. Her polling firm, Make America Number 1, was paid more than $950,000 while she transitioned from the Mercer-funded Ted Cruz campaign to the Mercer-supported Trump campaign.

Following the Electoral College win, Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer repeatedly visited the transition team at Trump Tower in Manhattan. An American who forfeited his U.S. citizenship to serve Israel,[19] Dermer also serves as a Trump intermediary for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and casino owner Sheldon Adelson. In support of the Israeli Right, Adelson spends a reported $50 million per year publishing for free Israel's largest circulation newspaper (Israel Today).[20]

Why Aren't They Registered as Foreign Agents?

Boasting that he is "the richest Jew in the world," the casino mogul convened the "Adelson primary" in his Las Vegas hotel and casino where many of the 17 candidates then vying for the Republican presidential nomination appeared in the hope of gaining the $20 million he provided former House Speaker Newt Gingrich in support of that Zionist Christian's 2012 presidential bid. When Gingrich withdrew from the race, Adelson gave a reported $30 million to support the campaign of Mormon Mitt Romney.[21] He invested an estimated $100 million in opposing Barack Obama's reelection in 2012—roughly three-tenths of one percent of his $30 billion fortune.[22]

In collaboration with senior Republican leaders of both the House and Senate, Dermer arranged to secretly invite Netanyahu to deliver a nationally televised speech on March 3, 2015 to a joint meeting of Congress in opposition to President Obama's ongoing negotiations on the Iran nuclear accord.[23] In one of the most fawning of many comments directed at Adelson's purse, Zionist Christian presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued that the negotiations "will take the Israelis and march them to the door of the oven." On the campaign trail, Trump mocked the accord as "disastrous," a theme that Friedman echoed when announcing his nomination as ambassador.[24]

Six days after Netanyahu's speech to Congress, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton also sought to undermine negotiations by releasing a letter to the Iranian leader signed by 47 Republican Senators implying that any Obama-negotiated accord could be undone by the Senate or the next president. The role played by Israel and its lobby was apparent but nontransparent and, as usual, went largely unmentioned by our pro-Israel mainstream media.

Those skeptical that a 37-year old freshman Senator would take this step on his own initiative had good reason to worry. Our National Security Agency (NSA) overheard Netanyahu conferring with Cotton. President Obama ordered the NSA to monitor Netanyahu and his aides when they and the Israel lobby sought to scuttle the Iran accord meant to prevent a war with Iran that has long been sought by supporters of Greater Israel. Cotton's campaign received more than $2 million in support from pro-Israeli groups and individuals. No single incident was enough to indict anyone for espionage or treason. Again, the Mercer influence was apparent in the contribution of more than $1 million to the Club for Growth Action, a Super PAC that financially backed Cotton.

The Emergency Committee for Israel, led by neoconservative William Kristol, invested $960,250 in last-minute ads supporting Cotton's Senate campaign. Kristol is co-founder of the Project for a New American Century established in 1997 to lobby for regime change in Iraq.[25] Paul Singer, a New York hedge fund billionaire and supporter (along with Sheldon Adelson) of Birthright Israel,[26] invested $250,000 in the production of Cotton's political career.[27] Seth Klarman, a Boston-based pro-Israeli billionaire, contributed $100,000. At least $825,000 was invested in Cotton by a political action committee run by former Bush-era U.N. Ambassador and bombastic neocon John Bolton.[28]

The Bolton PAC is financed largely by Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah and by Irving and Cherna Moskowitz of Miami who for years have funded settlements in Israel. Bolton appeared on President-elect Trump's short list for Secretary of State; Cotton was identified as an early favorite for Secretary of Defense.[29]

Cotton's rapid rise to political prominence traces to the same rightwing pro-Israelis who fund the hawkish Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) chaired by Adelson with Singer a director. They famously urged a first-strike nuclear attack on Iran to signal "our" seriousness about the Iranian nuclear program. They also gave $5.1 million to the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a neocon/Greater Israel think tank.[30] In 2016, Shelly and Mariam Adelson focused their political investments on Congressional and Senate campaigns to shore up the Zionification of the Republican Party confident that the Democratic Party has long been reliably pro-Israeli.

Foreign Influence

In 2012, Ron Dermer broke with long-standing diplomatic protocol to campaign in Florida for Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential candidate, an opponent of the Iran deal and, importantly, a Mormon.[31] Also known as the Lost Tribe of Israel, youth in this uniquely American version of Zionism are routinely recruited for employment in the F.B.I. and our intelligence services, an issue to which I will return.[32]

By stirring up the settlements issue, the Trump-enabled Israeli Right may well ignite another war-catalyzing intifada reminiscent of the Ariel Sharon-led march to the Al Aqsa Mosque (Temple Mount) in September 2000. That provocative armed march triggered the Second (Al Aqsa) Intifada one year prior to the mass murder provocation of 9/11 that served as a rationale for the regime change sought in Iraq for Greater Israel. Sharon organized that march after helping ensure the failure of international negotiations on a proposal to designate Jerusalem an international city protected for use by adherents of all three faiths that consider the ancient city sacred.[33]

Purposefully aggravating the settlements issue is consistent with the influence wielded within the Republican Party by Sheldon Adelson. He and his equally rightwing Israeli wife wielded their influence to ensure removal from the Republican Party platform of any mention of the two-state solution. The Democrats saw a similar scouring of their platform by the Israel lobby to delete any mention of the term "occupied territories."[34] The Zionification of the foreign policy platform of both parties began in earnest soon after Ronald Reagan came to Washington in January 1981.

The politicization of the Christian Right gained momentum when evangelical voters were targeted by those who produced the presidency of George W. Bush, a Born Again Zionist Christian. Their support grew even stronger in the post-9/11 environment of fear and insecurity, an emotional undercurrent also tapped by those who designed the microtargeted messaging that won the Electoral College vote for Donald Trump. The test-run for that approach dates to 2014 when Cambridge Analytica urged that North Carolina Senate candidate Thom Tillis shift his message from education policy to charges that incumbent Kay Hagan failed to take the rise of ISIS seriously. Tillis won.

Meanwhile, the Israeli Right continued their nonstop incitement campaign. For example, the Knesset advanced legislation in November 2016 allowing settlers to gain title to privately owned Palestinian land on which Jewish settlers illegally built, depriving Palestinians of their right to contest a forced sale. The Israeli Right has long benefitted politically from the violence produced by the occupation. With their deployment of simultaneous provocations, multiple goals are routinely pursued at the same time. As Senator Pat Leahy of Vermont summarized:

"One of the most effective ways that ISIS and other terrorist groups have attracted recruits is by tarring the United States with Israel's expanding occupation of the West Bank. This legislation to retroactively legalize illegal settlements will be welcomed by those murderous groups as further evidence that America's closest ally in the region is bent on destroying a peaceful solution, including the possibility of a Palestinian state."[35]

This steady march to the political right both in Israel and the U.S. persuaded President Obama to allow the U.N. passage on December 23, 2016 of a resolution declaring that the establishment of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967 "has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-State solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace." In effect, the resolution casts Israel as a criminal state operating well outside the norms of the rule of law.

The 14-0 vote, with the U.S. abstaining, ensures that the resolution will be impossible to rescind as at least one of the other four states with veto power will certainly object. At the urging of his Greater Israel advisers, Donald Trump signaled the Israeli Right that help was on the way and that U.S. support of the U.N. would be revisited.[36] Egged on by those he trusts, he reinforced the fanaticism and confidence of Jewish extremists and further emboldened their use of "reflexive" provocations certain to further inflame tensions and trigger violence by "radical Islamic extremists."

Election By Way of Deception

Taking full advantage of the new media ecosystem offered by the Private Superpowers of social media, the Trump campaign was the primary beneficiary of an onslaught of fake news as one in five social-media users modified their views about a political or social issue due to a social media post, according to a Pew Research survey published in October 2016. Almost half of Americans now rely on Facebook as a source of news. According to BuzzFeed, among the 20 most popular fake election stories that generated the most audience engagement on Facebook in the last three months of the campaign, all but three were either pro-Trump or anti-Hillary.

During that period, the top-performing fictitious election stories on Facebook generated more engagement than the top 20 stories by established media outlets, including the The New York Times, The Washington Post and NBC News. The fact-displacing/opinion-shaping capacity of social media was deployed with great success by digital strategists Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon in the service of those notorious for waging war by way of deception—the operating motto of the Israeli intelligence services. According to Cambridge Analytics where Bannon serves as a director, the recipe for profiling and persuading voters is now like "baking a cake."

It was not informed choice but psychographic microtargeting that enabled the Trump campaign to prevail in key electoral states. Victory went to the campaign best able to (a) identify persuadable voters, and (b) support its data points with appealing psychographics. Facebook emerged as "the micro-targeter's ultimate weapon" in providing access to voter data and crafting effective messaging.

Its long been known that algorithms determine what Facebook editors consider "news" which, in turn, is weighted for whatever is flagged as "liked" by identifiable networks of online friends. Contrary to the post-election comment by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook is not a "platform for public discourse" where people can be informed with facts. Its purpose is to drive traffic (attention spans) to a platform where Facebook can sell advertising and monetize the "clicks" of those lured to their platform.

Facts are only incidental. Facts are bypassed with algorithm-derived messaging that targets voters' profiled feelings (likes and dislikes), enabling the displacement of facts, rational arguments and even informed choice. Psychologist and game theory Nobel laureate economist Daniel Kahneman provides in Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011) a roadmap to detect and target the personal biases easily retrieved from the online self-profiling ("onboarding") provided by unwitting Internet users.[37]

Though this Facebook-enabled duplicity was well known for at least two years, only after this Greater Israel victory did Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg concede a need to address the problem.[38] On the 15th anniversary of 9/11 (seven weeks prior to the November 8 election), Facebook's 'trending' algorithms directed its 1.8 billion users to a "9/11 Truther" conspiracy theory claiming that the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks.[39] The next day it was announced that Facebook and Israel agreed to work together to rein in content that Israel says incites violence.[40]

By tweaking its algorithms to reduce "click bait," it's long been known that Facebook editors can put a political campaign out of business. Or promote a campaign that Facebook favors. Analysts have since confirmed that much of the fake news was targeted at Facebook users in swing states such as Florida and Ohio, benefitting the Trump campaign.[41] Exposure of its role in the 2016 election will provide Facebook with the excuse it needs to censor online content—such as this analysis—that exposes the shared pro-Israeli bias of those using this social media platform to "win" an election—by way of deception.

The Next (Israeli) Narrative

Post-election, those who produced the Trump presidency began to assemble a transition team, aided by a corps of pro-Israeli advisers to the Trump Organization.[42] His campaign advisers include General Keith Kellogg who served as chief operating officer for the Coalition Provisional Authority that governed Iraq following the 2003 invasion. It was on his watch that U.S. Ambassador Paul Bremer disbanded the Sunni-dominant Republican Guard that became ISIL. No one knows how much of the 363 tons of U.S. currency flown into a war zone on his watch found its way to ISIL.

When Trump named Kansas Congressman Mike Pompeo, a critic of the Iran accord, as his choice for Director of the C.I.A., the Republican Jewish Coalition (chaired by casino multi-billionaire Sheldon Adelson) described him as a "wonderful choice" and a "true friend of Israel."[43] When Mitt Romney made Trump's short list as a potential Secretary of State, the war-with-Iran agenda came sharply back into focus. A lay bishop in the Mormon Church, a Romney presidency would by now have likely led the U.S. into Israel's long-sought war with Iran.

During Romney's 2012 campaign, foreign policy adviser Dan Senor assured journalists that if Israel launched a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Romney "would respect the move." Regardless of their personal differences (Romney called Trump a "phony" and a "fraud"), Romney's hardline position on Iran qualified him for consideration as Secretary of State for a Greater Israel presidency. That top foreign policy post instead went to Rex Tillerson, CEO of ExxonMobil, a firm founded by my great-grandfathers.[44]

Had Romney been included in a Trump administration, Trump would have been seen as magnanimous and Romney's role would have been portrayed as unifying the party. In truth, it would have confirmed that Zionists consolidated their power in a presidency produced to take us to war in Iran for Greater Israel. Placing a Mormon bishop in that high profile position would have made the Greater Israel agenda too obvious.

The Next Cold War

Those promoting the narrative of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election fail to mention that Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer campaigned for Romney in 2012 or that Netanyahu was featured in a Romney campaign ad in Florida warning of the Iranian threat. Evidence of Israeli influence may stall any Senate investigation of the purported hacking of our election at the direction of Vladimir Putin. As yet, Americans are unaware that Russian Jews compose the hardcore center of the Likud Party led by Netanyahu with Russian Avigdor Lieberman his Deputy Prime Minister, then Foreign Minister and now Defense Minister.[45] By appointing as "our" ambassador and negotiator ultra-right pro-Israelis Friedman and Greenblatt, Trump pushed Netanyahu further to the Right.

The Israeli Right had the means, motive and opportunity to make it appear that Russia was behind the cyber-attacks. With Russian Jews a dominant voting bloc in the Israeli Right, it's possible they made it appear that Putin is the problem.[46] My life experience suggests that the discrediting of American democracy traces not to Putin nor even to Trump but to the U.S. Israel-relationship that enabled their production of a presidency with this petulant asset "our" Commander-in-Chief.[47]

Romney adviser Dan Senor hailed Dan Pompeo as a "superb pick" to lead our premier intelligence agency (Mitt Romney's July 2012 trip to Israel was described as the "brainchild" of Senor and Dermer).[48] As spokesperson for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad and senior adviser to Administrator Paul Bremer,[49] Senor put a positive spin on the disastrous post-invasion policies that devastated Iraq and pre-staged conditions that led to the emergence of ISIL/ISIS.[50] During his tenure in Iraq, the (Jewish neocon) Senor advanced not U.S. interests but the interests of those working for Greater Israel.[51]

The Trump "election" confirms that Jewish elites and extremists have amassed enough control to pick presidential advisers able to shape U.S. foreign policy for the next fifty years. Lt. General Michael Flynn, former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency,[52] was quickly named as Trump's choice for National Security Adviser. After the attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya in 2012, Flynn repeatedly pressed his intelligence officers to find a link to Iran—in much the same way that Vice President Dick Cheney and Lewis Libby, his (Jewish neocon) chief of staff, pressed C.I.A. officers to find a 9/11 link to Iraq. In neither case was there a link.

In July 2016, just as the GOP nominating convention convened in Cleveland, Flynn published The Field of Fight: How We Can Win the Global War Against Radical Islam and Its Allies co-authored by neocon Michael Ledeen. The book named China is one of the nations in a "working coalition" allied with "radical Islamists and regimes in Havana, Pyongyang, Moscow and Beijing."[53] The book's well-timed release foreshadowed a post-election victory call to President-elect Trump from Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen. That call unsettled almost four decades of a One China policy, ignited foreseeable tensions in U.S.-China relations, and pre-staged a potential crisis early in the Trump presidency.[54]

The foreword to the Flynn/Ledeen book features former Senator Joseph Lieberman, a self-described Jewish Zionist, who—along with Senator John McCain—marketed the false intelligence that induced us to wage an unnecessary and unwinnable war in Iraq that undermined our true national interests. Ledeen worked closely over decades with three of the most strategically well-placed (Jewish) neocons: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith.[55] The Flynn/Ledeen insistence on a stronger rhetorical stance on Islam found its way into Trump's speeches when he routinely chastised President Obama for his failure to use the phrase "radical Islamic extremists" when framing the national narrative that Trump's (Orthodox Jewish) advisers will now make a centerpiece of this presidency.

Knowledge Obliges

If we experience another emotionally wrenching mass murder that can plausibly be blamed on "radical Islamic extremists," President Barack Obama will be responsible due to his failure to engage the facts of what my life experience proves. That presidential liability spans three presidencies. Had the intelligence I uncovered in Iraq been engaged in good faith by the FBI on my return from Baghdad in February 1997, Saddam Hussein could have been removed without a war.[56]

Personnel within both the F.B.I. and the D.I.A. were complicit in blocking an investigation able to confirm that the source of this corruption—and treason—traces to those skilled at waging war "by way of deception." To avoid engagement, FBI agents (many of them Mormons) repeatedly sought to portray me as the problem.[57] As my father pointed out in a 1964 speech at Harvard University during his second of four terms as Governor of New York, those posing the greatest threat to our nation exhibit a "tireless genius for crisis." Thus the well-timed revival of Hillary Clinton's email scandal ten days prior to the election by FBI Director James Comey, creating a campaign crisis that helped shift votes to Trump whose ego makes him an easily manipulated asset.

Pro-Israeli Steve Bannon

Trump "senior strategic counsel" Steve Bannon was recruited as a campaign strategist from the alt-right Breitbart News where he served as Executive Chairman. His prominent role in the Trump presidency set off charges that he is a white nationalist, a racist and an anti-Semite. That portrayal lays the foundation for manipulating reactions within both the Black Lives Matter movement and among hate-mongering white power advocates.[58]

In truth, Bannon is a political product of the Israeli Right. Andrew Breitbart worked at The Drudge Report and The Huffington Post before his concept for Breitbart News originated—while in Israel—as a media platform that would be unapologetically pro-Zionist. On Breitbart's death in 2012, he was praised by pro-Israelis Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. Like his former boss, Bannon lavishes praise on extremists among the pro-Israeli Right, including Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Ongoing attempts to portray Bannon as an anti-Semite are misdirection by a predominantly pro-Israel mainstream media. According to Jared Kushner, "All I know about Steve is my experience working with him. He's an incredible Zionist and loves Israel."[59]

When Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer left his first post-election meeting with President-elect Trump, he was quick to praise Bannon as was Zionist Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. In 2015, Bannon joined Breitbart's (Jewish) CEO Larry Solov to launch Breitbart Jerusalem "specifically to cover the region from an unabashedly Zionist perspective."[60] Bannon also hosted 29 interviews with Frank Gaffney whose Center for Security Policy is known for its ultra-right Zionist views. Bannon praised Gaffney, insisting that he is "doing amazing work, doing God's work...Just fantastic."[61]

Tellingly, Bannon featured six interviews with Pamela Geller ("her time has come"). Founder of the pro-Israel, Islam-bashing American Freedom Defense Institute. Geller emerged as an outspoken post-9/11 opponent of the "ground zero mosque," an opposition effort funded by Robert Mercer who also contributed $10 million to pro-Zionist Breitbart News. Revealingly, Geller was one of only five recipients of a Zionist "manifesto" written by Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik who killed 77 people on July 22, 2011 to draw attention to his Zionist manifesto.[62] I am confident that Breivik's mass murder marks the point in time when Zionist extremists shifted their focus to anti-Islam as the next hate-mongering narrative meant to induce us to wage their next war.

Based on Bannon's known support for the Israeli Right and Greater Israel, one can only marvel at attempts to brand him anti-Semitic. That obvious deception only further heightens my concern at how soon that misleading portrayal will be used to support the next agenda-advancing crisis. Those who wage war "by way of deception" routinely pre-stage collateral crises to draw attention away from a main event—such as undermining the nuclear accord with Tehran. Based on the media coverage given both to the Black Lives Matter narrative and the white nationalist narrative, conflicts based on race or ethnicity are poised to emerge as the attention-diverting crises deployed to obscure the manipulation of an easily provoked Donald Trump to take us to war in Iran.

When candidate Trump did not immediately disavow his endorsement by David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan leader, that delay energized his alt-right base and pre-staged the plausibility of a racial conflict. The parallels with how fascists assumed power in Germany are chilling. Only this time, anti-Islam rather than anti-Semitism is positioned to emerge as the hate-mongering catalyst. With a mass murder provocation (such as a dirty bomb) plausibly traceable to "radical Islamic extremists," it's easy to imagine how an anti-Islam version of Kristallnacht could lead to the burning of mosques and the murder of Muslims.[63] That violence, in turn, could coincide with a manufactured crisis of racially motivated riots—particularly if such civil unrest helps distract attention from those pre-staging another war in the Middle East.

But For the U.S.-Israel Relationship

Had the U.S. not agreed to a "special relationship" with the Zionist experiment now known as Israel, would a U.S. president-elect, in effect, be assembling a War Cabinet with three generals as Cabinet-level appointees?[64] I've no reason to believe that Donald Trump understands how his self-absorption was profiled and serviced to produce this presidency.[65] Though this is clearly the Trump presidency, it would be wrong to describe it as "his" presidency. When Americans grasp how this presidency was produced—by whom and for whom—he will be remembered as the last president for Greater Israel.

When, as President-elect, Trump first met with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, he looked like a deer in the headlights. Three weeks later, after he harshly criticized Obama in one of his Twitter tirades, he received a call from Obama and shortly thereafter emerged from his Palm Beach estate to speak to the press. Looking like a schoolyard bully who had just been whipped, he stated that he and President Obama had a "very good conversation" though his body language indicated that he gotten chewed out for his reckless behavior.

His need to protect his ego, his image and the Trump brand makes him highly susceptible to manipulation by those who will use him just as previous presidents were used. Rest assured, (a) he has numerous skeletons in his closet including hushed-up sex and financial scandals, and (b) his scandals are known to his (predominantly Jewish) senior staff in the Trump Organization.[66] If the experience of past presidents is any indication, the threatened release of those scandals will be used to shape presidential decision-making, particularly when it comes to issues critical to advancing Greater Israel.[67]

Speaking in Code

Trillions of dollars and countless lives have been squandered due to our entangled alliance with Israel. The tragedy in Syria, set in motion by Israel, could trigger the next global military crisis. When CNN described conditions in Aleppo as a "holocaust," it was apparent that manipulators of the national narrative were nearby.[68] For the U.S., Syria offered a no-win scenario. We still do not know if the use of chemical weapons in Syria was a false flag attack meant to induce us to invade Syria as a means to take us to war in Iran—for Greater Israel.[69] However we do know that the Trump presidency is staffed at the top by people he trusts who are demonstrably rightwing pro-Israel.

For a candidate who disparaged regime change, Team Trump is brimming with people committed to the use of duplicity to produce regime change. That includes the manipulation of our political process to produce the Trump regime. At least three of his most trusted (Orthodox Jewish) advisers—Kushner, Friedman and Greenblatt—know that more settlements will incite more hatred against the U.S., ensuring in response the radical Islamic extremism required to justify a war with Iran—for Greater Israel. This is how "nonlinear warfare" is deployed to induce a target (the U.S.) to act against our own true interests. Known in game theory warfare as "active measures," this typifies how so few can exert such vast influence in the U.S. through "reflexive control"—anticipating our reaction to events staged by those with a "tireless genius for crisis."[70] Thus the key role played by 9/11.

Democrats selected pro-Israeli New York Senator Chuck Schumer as Senate Minority Leader and Illinois Senator Dick Durbin as Minority Whip. No mainstream media outlet mentioned that Durbin was handpicked by the Israel lobby to replace Congressman Paul Findley and then groomed for the Senate. That 1982 campaign marked the first time that the Zionist lobby openly removed a member of Congress after Findley committed political suicide by challenging Israeli policy on Palestine.[71]

By promising unity between Democrats and Republicans, Schumer made it more difficult to identify the influence of Israel and its lobby when another Pearl Harbor-like provocation is staged to induce another war in the Middle East. Tellingly, Democrat Schumer and Republican John McCain were the first Senators to criticize Secretary of State John Kerry for his December 28th critique of Israeli settlement policies as a barrier to peace in the Middle East.[72]

When Schumer announced the new Senate leadership, he signaled Israeli confidence in what can be accomplished with the pro-Israeli Team Trump running the Executive Branch allied with pro-Israeli Republicans and Democrats in key positions of influence in the Congress. When introducing his Senate team, including progressive Bernie Sanders,[73] this New York Zionist described the two opposing parties as standing "shoulder-to-shoulder." That signature phrase was made famous by rightwing Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon who routinely deployed that phrase when describing how, after 9/11, the U.S. and Israel would stand "shoulder-in-shoulder" in combating terrorism.

Schumer's choice of words may have been 'code' signaling Israelis and pro-Israelis that all is well—much as, ten days prior to 9/11, Tel Aviv announced a $1 million gift to Israeli super-spy Jonathan Pollard who did as much to undermine U.S. national security as any American in modern history. Pollard was then was granted Israeli citizenship by grateful Zionists even though Reagan-era Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger urged his execution.[74] As a former C.I.A. Director conceded, the 9/11 attacks took ten years to plan and execute requiring the assistance of a stable nation-state with intelligence operations inside the U.S. That description fits only one nation that pretends to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the U.S. while abusing its "special relationship" to advance Greater Israel.

The Cost of this Entangled Alliance

Both Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Al Gore in 2000 won the popular vote. In both cases, their loss in the Electoral College traced to key states—particularly Florida in 2000 where pro-Israelis wield outsized influence. The Trump campaign lacked the ground game to generate those electoral results. Thus the social media-enabled microtargeting of voters as Kushner, Bannon, Mercer & Co. focused on a few key states required to prevail in the Electoral College. That outcome was sought by those who wanted the immature and malleable Donald Trump in 2016 to wage the next war for Greater Israel just as they wanted the dysfunctional and pliable George W. Bush in 2000—to wage a war for Greater Israel. Hillary Clinton was far less likely to lead us into another war.

She attended enough classified briefings to know the role that Israel and its lobby have repeatedly played in deceiving us to act against our true national interests. The same holds true for Al Gore who was too knowledgeable and, unlike Dubya, too functional to lead us into an unwinnable war in the Middle East. By manipulating the 2000 election to make it appear that George Bush stole the election, pro-Israeli operatives retained a plausible cover ("We really wanted Gore.") had the intelligence I gathered in Baghdad in 1997 been engaged in good faith prior to a November 2000 "election" that installed a Born Again Zionist Christian as "our" Commander-in-Chief.[75]

They required Dubya and his unfulfilled needs to pull off 9/11 and induce him to remove Saddam as part of Israel's regime change agenda for Greater Israel. Making it appear that Trump (like Bush) stole the election was a "double blind cover"[76] meant to obscure the fact that Jewish elites and extremists knew they could more easily manipulate Trump's needs than persuade Hillary to advance their agenda as she did in Libya. Though a hawk, I believe that Hillary Clinton—like Al Gore—would have been far more difficult to manipulate while Mitt Romney's Mormon-Zionist beliefs would have made him easy. Trump's needy ego makes him even easier, particularly when advised by hardline Zionists that he trusts.

Dubya was deceived to lead our allies into an unnecessary and unwinnable war reliant on false and outright fixed intelligence. Deploying classic game theory warfare, Tel Aviv knew it could rely on the Sunni-Shia conflict to catalyze the radical Islamic extremists of ISIL. An invasion-induced cascade of reactions reignited an ancient conflict-of-opposites (Sunni vs. Shia) that, in turn, enabled Israel to ally with Sunni Saudi Arabia, its perceived enemy, with a shared dislike of Shia Iran.[77] The only winner: Jewish elites and extremists skilled at leveraging their small numbers to great effect through nonlinear game theory warfare.[78]

The Bush/Trump Doctrine

When Israeli policy was embraced as the Bush Doctrine ("go anywhere and kill anyone seen as a threat"), the U.S. forfeited its moral leadership earned at enormous cost in blood and treasure during WWII. That's a key reason Zionists wanted George Bush and Dick Cheney in 2000 not Al Gore and Joe Lieberman. Plus Israel needed Lieberman in the Senate post-9/11 as the key salesman—along with asset John McCain—for the false intelligence that deceived us to pursue Israel's destabilizing regime change strategy in Iraq, a nation that played no role in 9/11.[79] With the Israel lobby emboldened by the Trump victory and John McCain serving as chairman of the Senate Committee on Armed Services, the risks of another war are very real—awaiting only the next well-timed crisis.

Without the mass murder provocation of 3,000 people on 9/11, Zionist Christian George W. Bush likely would not have been induced to lead the U.S. and its allies to war in Iraq in March 2003. When, in March 2015, the right-wing Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu addressed a joint meeting of Congress in an attempt to scuttle negotiations with Tehran, had a crisis been staged with U.S. casualties—plausibly traceable to Tehran—the major world powers would not now enjoy a nuclear accord with Iran. Thus the very real risks of continuing an alliance with an enclave of elites and extremists known to possess a "tireless genius for crisis" and a history of waging wars "by way of deception"—often by deceiving others to wage their wars for them. Israel is not our agent in the Middle East as some among its defenders claim; we've long been their agent, albeit without the public's knowledge or informed consent.

Those who induced Donald Trump to run for president (he never expected to win) prompted his promise to scrap the accord with Iran. If he withdraws U.S. support, the accord will remain in place. The impact would ensure that we further isolate ourselves internationally, alienate our allies and discredit ourselves even more, leaving us with Israel as one of our few remaining allies, an outcome that key Team Trump advisers appear willing to embrace. That agenda could be accelerated with another mass murder during the transition period or early on in the Trump presidency—as with Bush when the crisis of 9/11 was staged less than eight months after his January 2001 inaugural.[80]

After overseeing the digital media campaign, Jared Kushner became a trusted voice overseeing a transition team tasked with staffing the executive branch with the 4,700+ positions that an incoming president appoints. The influence of Mitt Romney supporters Bibi Netanyahu and Sheldon Adelson became apparent when Trump agreed to meet with Romney who both men supported for president in 2012, apparently anticipating he may lead us to war with Iran. Now they are relying on Trump and those to whom he is being induced to turn for advice, including Rahm Israel Emanuel, President Obama's first White House chief of staff. Trump's 35-year old Orthodox Jewish son-in-law signaled his expertise—and interest—in brokering an accord between Israel and the Palestinians.

Selling Conflicts of Opposites

As Russian President Vladimir Putin conceded in July 2013 at the Jewish Museum in Moscow, the first Soviet government "was 80-85 percent Jewish." In the U.S., the Greater Israel lobby has long been feared for its political clout. Add to that power the influence wielded by mainstream media and the major film studios (both dominantly Jewish-owned or controlled) and it becomes clear how difficult it is to protect our national interests from those adept at manipulating our national narrative to "wage war by way of deception."

As the profitable Cold War conflict-of-opposites receded into the background, the storyline of the West vs. Islam emerged in the foreground as a new opportunity for war profiteering. A Vladimir Putin-led Russia poses an existential threat not to the U.S. but to those hoping to use the Trump presidency to take us to war in Iran for Greater Israel, an effort that Moscow is certain to resist as is Beijing. Those promoting that war are reviving The Clash of Civilizations, an agenda-advancing narrative first devised in 1990 by Zionist Bernard Lewis, a professor at Princeton University. The portrayal of Vladimir Putin as a foreign manipulator of our presidential election obscures both an electoral manipulation for Greater Israel and a manipulation of the national narrative by the Israel lobby and their pro-Israeli allies in media and popular culture.

Here's one example of the costly and profitable nature of their duplicity. In the seven-year interval between the Communist-bashing House Un-American Activities Committee hearings of 1947 and the Senate's "Red Scare" McCarthy hearings in 1954, Hallgarten & Co. investment banker Donald Stralem produced the film Duck And Cover. Shown by mandatory attendance to more than 40 million American schoolchildren nationwide, the film instructed students­ that—when they saw the flash of an atomic bomb—to duck under their desks and cover their heads. At a 1951 cost of $350,000 ($3.2 million in 2017 dollars), this senior manager of Rothschild interests in the U.S. succeeded with this film in terrifying an entire generation of post-WWII Baby Boomer children and their parents.[81]

The rationale cited for government sponsorship of that psy-ops film was the "emotion management" requirements of Truman-era Civil Defense during a presidency produced by (predominantly Jewish) organized crime. Stralem's financial and geostrategic goal was to internalize—at an early age—the fear and insecurity required to ensure support for decades of Cold War defense spending. That 9-1/2 minute film seared into the national psyche the threat of an imminent "atomic" attack by Soviet Evil Doers. With the help of Hollywood, pliable politicians and mainstream media, that internalized narrative sustained tens of trillions of dollars in national security spending from WWII until the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and beyond. In 1956, Stralem arranged for the marriage of my mother to the brother of Robert King Cunningham. In effect, that marriage put a Rothschild operative in my home when I was four years old.

The "Red Scare" was recently revived along with another costly price tag—a pledge to spend $1 trillion to update and upgrade America's nuclear arsenal—despite knowing those weapons can never be used without irrevocably harming the planet. Thus the need to cast Vladimir Putin as an Evil Doer to revive the profitable Cold War conflict-of-opposites. As with the war in Iraq, we will need to borrow the funds for this highly profitable project. The financial cost alone of the war in Iraq—to the U.S. alone—is projected to top $6 trillion, including $4 trillion in interest paid through 2053.[82]

How Many More Wars for Israel?

The depth and duration of this profitable deceit is difficult to grasp. In 1948, Chaim Weizmann assured Harry Truman that the Zionists would take no more land. Now we know that's what they intended from the outset. Shimon Peres took pride at how he deceived us while he secured the components required for Israel to build its arsenal of nuclear weapons. Ariel Sharon assured us that, if Saddam Hussein were removed, Israel would make peace with the Palestinians. Now they've made a two-state solution impossible and extremist members of Israel's governing coalition seek to grant legal title to privately owned Palestinian lands occupied by Jewish settlers. As lineal descendants of David, they believe they have a God-given right to that land and a right to operate above the law.

I am confident that is why the Talmud was bifurcated in the 5th Century AD. That bifurcation created the Babylonian Talmud, a key reason why those responsible deceived us to wage their war in Iraq to bring this full-circle back to the land of the original Semites who were not Jewish but those who lived in the marshes of Iraq, the original meaning of the word Semite. The lineal rights of the Davidic line of Judaism trace directly to Leo Strauss and the Hesse region of Germany where descendants of this lineage created the duplicitous techniques that enabled Zionism to ravage the U.S. and other nations.

As my life experience proves, Zionists are far more dangerous that radical Islamic extremists. Jews, Christians and Muslims lived together peaceably in the region until the arrival of the Zionists. It's clear they never intended to abide by the agreements they made to gain U.S. support for establishing the Jewish state. Their goal from the outset was to provoke hatred and create serial wars and crises as a means to expand their influence throughout the region, the outcome that most concerned our Joint Chiefs when they urged that Harry Truman decline their tearful requests.

While I was in Baghdad in January/February 1997, Saddam Hussein closed the ancient site of Babylon for a guided tour by an Iraqi colleague and me. On our return, personnel within the F.B.I. and the D.I.A. sought to use photos taken of us there as a means to preclude consideration of the intelligence with which we returned that could have removed Saddam without a war.[83] Based on the consistency of the behavior that I profiled my entire life, I am confident that Zionists directed the operations that ensured I was silence so that they could deceive us to wage their war for Greater Israel. From this point forward, the facts proven by my experience suggest that anyone urging support for Israel should be considered complicit in treason. Thus my concern that the Trump presidency was produced not to Make America Great Again but to advance the interests of Greater Israel at the expense of America and Americans.

Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump proposed to relocate our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, granting Zionists the perception that Americans recognize that ancient city as "the eternal capital of the Jewish people." That provocation is certain to outrage Muslims worldwide and further inflame those who already hate us—due largely to the costs that we have imposed on others due to this entangled alliance. The history of this "special relationship" suggests that more hatred toward us is precisely the outcome sought with this provocation by the Israeli Right.

Pre-staging the Next Conflict-of-Opposites

Mainstream media portrays Trump supporters as uneducated white nationalists and racists. In truth, many of them are understandably upset at being left behind by Washington's embrace of the financial markets-obsessed "consensus" model of economics and the job-displacing forces set in motion by the current version of globalization. However, when it becomes clear to his disaffected base that a Trump presidency cannot deliver what was promised—and they expect—they will respond. If those who produced the Trump presidency can induce him to lead the U.S. into another war, we could see this nation fracture as never before under the strain of multiple crises—social, fiscal, geopolitical, financial, ecological—generating an outcome that will only further empower and enrich those doing this.

The annual budget for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now approaches $42 billion. The Patriot Act, drafted well prior to 9/11, authorizes suspension of the Constitution, including habeas corpus. My life experience suggests that DHS was founded not to protect Americans from radical Islamic extremists but to protect the perpetrators when Americans realize that this duplicity traces to a common source.[84]

If, as the facts suggest, the goal is to trigger domestic violence, the DHS (and the National Guard) can be mobilized to detain the disaffected, including Trump's base—adding outrage to their frustration, resentment and disillusionment. Based on the pre-staging to date, the most likely conflict-of-opposites will be provoked between those branded as white nationalists and those active in the Black Lives Matter movement.

Political strategist Steve Bannon is being branded by mainstream media as a plausible instigator conspiring from the shadows to mobilize the disgruntled alt-right. This social media-savvy adviser knows how to mobilize "persuade-ables" to achieve a political objective, as he proved November 8th. Conventional politics and informed choice can be displaced with the use of divisive rhetoric (that can later be disavowed) designed to penetrate online "filter bubbles" and reach the disaffected in their social media silos and online echo chambers. For those skilled at advancing their goals by way of deception under the cover of well-timed crisis, Bannon is the perfect adviser for this president.

If It Looks Like Fascism...

No one knows what will happen when Americans realize that their freedom now depends on freeing their government from the outsized influence wielded by Israel, pro-Israelis and the Israel lobby. What happens when that knowledge reaches a critical mass? In the Age of Transparency, it will. What's the reaction when a long-deceived American public realize that their informed choice was manipulated to take us to war for Jewish elites and extremists?

What we now see emerging is Fascism Lite. Donald Trump's easily profiled ego ensures he will do whatever is required to protect his self-interest and preclude his exposure as a political fraud and a reality show clown. That doesn't mean he's evil—only that he's a political product of those masterful at manipulating the needs of such assets. With both houses of Congress in the hands of pro-Israeli Republicans, with pro-Israeli Democrats (such as Chuck Schumer) holding key positions in the Congress, and with a pliable asset in the White House advised by rightwing pro-Israelis, the Zionist vision of global domination by The Chosen is now seen by them as a real possibility.

An enemies list is usually the first step in creating a fascist state like Germany in the 1930s. Lists created during the "Red scare" of the 1950s (traceable to this same trans-generational criminal syndicate) helped create and consolidate the Far Right control now emergent in Washington. When this rightward political tilt is exploited by those with a tireless genius for crisis, the outcome risks the suspension of key rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

Those complicit in this duplicity have long operated in the U.S. and worldwide as war profiteers. Their genius for well-timed crisis enables them to create serial conflicts-of-opposites (the opposing sides are irrelevant) to profit off the misery of both sides. As the Cold War wound down, they ramped up radical Islamic extremism as the new agenda-setting, profit-making narrative. Muslims are now the target of hate just as the broader Jewish community was targeted by those who produced the post-WWI financial conditions that evoked in response the ethnic nationalism of German Chancellor Adolph Hitler. Anti-Semitism enabled these duplicitous few to hide in plain sight as WWII segued seamlessly into the profitable Cold War and, without missing a budgetary beat, into the war on terror as this latest marketing of fear and insecurity morphs into the War on Islam.

But For Well-Timed Crises

Without the mass murder of the WWII Holocaust, even Harry Truman, a dysfunctional Zionist Christian Democrat, could not have been persuaded to recognize this enclave of extremists as a legitimate state. Without the mass murder of 9/11, even George Bush, a dysfunctional Zionist Christian Republican, could not have been persuaded to invade Iraq, a nation that had nothing to do with 9/11. At each hinge of history, the facts point to the same source of duplicity as a key reason the U.S. has not been at war for only 21 years since its founding.[85]

Those complicit financed both sides in our Civil War of the 1860s. Even now, no one can explain how the world's great powers were induced to wage the senseless slaughter of WWI. The post-war reparations burden imposed on Germany was certain to humiliate a proud people, catalyzing an angry reaction that—consistent with nonlinear game theory warfare—fueled an extremist form of nationalism (sound familiar?) that became the National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazis). At every step we find at work in the background those with a "tireless genius for crisis."

The past 150+ years have been a study in senseless murder, mayhem and forgone opportunities while a sociopathic few profited. That includes the U.S. being induced to wage an unwinnable war in Vietnam that killed more than 58,000 Americans and as many as 1.5 million Vietnamese—and for what? President Kennedy wanted us to disengage. After his murder, successor Lyndon Johnson, another Zionist Christian presidential product,[86] led us even deeper into that morass. When LBJ withdrew from the presidential race in March 1968, a Henry Kissinger-advised Richard Nixon expanded the war into Cambodia and Laos, ensuring another seven years of war profiteering.

In the age of transparency, those doing this—over centuries—know they now at risk of being exposed. With exposure comes the prospect of accountability under law for crimes against humanity. That possibility may motivate those complicit to stage crises that are more severe in their impact and more wide-ranging in their reach. Israel reportedly possesses suitcase-sized nuclear weapons. For those who view themselves as the Chosen of God accountable only to a god of their choosing, will they may opt for self-destruction rather than concede personal responsibility?

When world leaders are forced by an informed public to acknowledge the source of the problem, what happens if, in the interest of peace, those leaders insist on the nuclear weapons-free Middle East that was sought by President Kennedy in 1963? What will be the response if, as my life experience proves, those responsible kill those who interfere with their agenda for Greater Israel? That possibility is suggested by the well-timed murder in January 2002 of Lt. General Arie Kumaat, the head of Indonesian Intelligence, just as he was arranging for me to brief Muslim heads of state on the false intelligence that took us to war in Iraq. [See "The Indonesia Connection" and "The War in Iraq Could Have Been Prevented" on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.]

Who Should Be Held Accountable?

Accountability begins by acknowledging that Israel and its lobby have long manipulated Jewish identity and preyed on the fear and insecurity of the broader Jewish community. In 1948, this community knew that Zionist elites and extremists posed a threat to their assimilation. Skeptics of the Zionist experiment have been proven correct—at enormous cost to the U.S. and other nations induced to ally with the Jewish state. The consistency of their behavior confirms that Albert Einstein and 27 other prominent Jews were correct in their December 4, 1948 letter to The New York Times when they described Zionist leaders as "Jewish fascists" who seek a "leader state." Jewish novelist Hannah Arendt called them simply "Jewish Nazis." Since 1948, they've become steadily more rightwing. When Yitzhak Rabin showed a more moderate face of Israeli leadership, Benjamin Netanyahu's incitement of Likud Party extremists provoked Likud member Yigal Amir to assassinate Rabin in November 1995.

This is not "a people" doing this.[87] Those responsible are our leaders—both civilian and military—who knew about this duplicity yet continued to allow those complicit to operate with legal impunity. That includes President Barack Obama who has long been aware of what can be proven by my life experience profiling those who befriend to betray and foster trust in order to defraud. Israel is not a friend but an enemy within. The cost of their treachery is incalculable—and growing. The boundless self-absorption of their latest prime minister mirrors the self-absorption of the persona poised to become "our" Commander-in-Chief as part of this long-running fraud on humanity.

No one can Make America Great Again without reforming—or severing—an entangled alliance that has for far too long imposed a hidden tax on humanity. Forcing the Israel lobby to comply with the Foreign Agents Registration Act is the barest minimum required to begin to restore our national security and protect our national interests. Restoration of the rule of law requires accountability at law for those my life experience proves are responsible.

[rmstock]

It's getting clearer than ever that `Dog-crap Donnie' never was a part of `The Club'.

[yankeedoodle]

It's getting clearer than ever that `Dog-crap Donnie' never was a part of `The Club'.

Of course, this is the great con. Dog-crap Donnie thinks his club - he has his own, don't you know, called Mar-a-Lago - is the best.  Of course, when all the fucking morons in their $20 red hats show up at Mar-a-Lago, the doors will open wide and food and drink will be free.  Horray!  HA! HA!  http://www.maralagoclub.com

But, give Dog-crap Donnie credit.  In previous years, we American's were bombarded with idiotic phrases such as:  "You could sit down and have a beer with him," or I'd like to sit down and have a beer with him," or blah blah blah puke puke puke.

That, thankfully, is finished, because 1) Dog-crap Donnie doesn't drink, which simply means he can't handle it, and 2) Dog-crap Donnie wouldn't sit down with some dumb peasant dumb enough to have believed the shit he was spouting. 

Dog-crap Donnie, of course, aspires to join what he thinks is the greatest club, the Kike Club.    (That's the red-hatted bastard punishing the goy on orders from the jews.)




WELCOME FROM DONALD J. TRUMP

It is with great pleasure that I welcome you to the Mar-a-Lago Club.





WEDDINGS & EVENTS

For weddings, galas and private parties, The Mar-a-Lago Club is beyond compare.



PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP

It would be our pleasure to acquaint you with the benefits of membership.

[rmstock]

It's getting clearer than ever that `Dog-crap Donnie' never was a part of `The Club'.

Dog-crap Donnie, of course, aspires to join what he thinks is the greatest club, the Kike Club.    (That's the red-hatted bastard punishing the goy on orders from the jews.)

Why should `Dog-crap Donnie' feel the urge to join a crime based `Kike Club'
when there is no need for him to do so ?