The smear campaign against Gilad Atzmon

Started by yankeedoodle, December 27, 2018, 02:53:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

yankeedoodle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=735SaKwez2A

Banned: The Smear Campaign Against British-Israeli Peace Activist Gilad Atzmon
Jazz saxophonist and writer Gilad Atzmon was recently banned from playing at an assembly hall in Islington, a borough of London, by order of the Islington Town Council. This came about as a result of an e-mail from one person – Martin Rankoff – saying nothing more than that if Atzmon was going to be [...]
https://www.mintpressnews.com/the-smear-campaign-against-british-israeli-peace-activist-gilad-atzmon/253344/


December 27th, 2018

By Richard Hugus
Jazz saxophonist and writer Gilad Atzmon was recently banned from playing at an assembly hall in Islington, a borough of London, by order of the Islington Town Council. This came about as a result of an e-mail from one person – Martin Rankoff – saying nothing more than that if Atzmon was going to be at the venue on December 21 he would give a ticket that was given to him to someone else.

Rankoff wrote, "Mr Atzmon's news and beliefs I personally find repulsive and do not wish to be in the same place as him, let alone listen to his music." Rankoff included links to ADL and Israeli news outlets accusing Atzmon of antisemitism. Incredibly, on the basis of this letter alone, the Islington Council went way out of its way and contacted the show's promoter to get Atzmon banned—something Rankoff didn't even ask for.

Imagine the situation in reverse: Gilad Atzmon writes a letter to the Council saying he is uncomfortable with Martin Rankoff appearing in the audience at Islington assembly hall. He refers to Mr. Rankoff's pro-Israel Twitter page where Rankoff calls Jeremy Corbyn "A F***ing Antisemite and Racist" and where Corbyn is pictured on a bike with a comment suggesting Corbyn should be rammed by a car. Atzmon says that he doesn't feel safe with Rankoff in the audience. He finds Mr. Rankoff's support for Israel repulsive because Israel was founded on genocide against the people of Palestine. As proof he provides links to news reports on the slaughter of unarmed protestors in Gaza since March 30, 2018, and a story on the Deir Yassin massacre of 1948.

This imaginary second complaint would have been scorned as an abridgement of Rankoff's rights. Indeed, since the Islington Council has adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism, in which criticism of Israel is deemed antisemitic, the Council would probably feel obliged to forward the letter to the authorities as evidence of hate speech.

The Council provided a statement https://www.islington.media/news/statement-gilad-atzmon  on the banning in which it says: "under the Equality Act 2010, the Council must, in the exercise of its functions, have due regard to the need to foster good relations between different races and religions within the borough. The Council took account of the fact that Mr Atzmon's presence at the Hall, and knowledge of his presence among residents of the borough, might harm such relationships, as well as the Council's duty to tackle prejudice and promote understanding within the borough."

This begs the question — in what way would either the "presence" of Gilad Atzmon or "knowledge of his presence among residents" harm the relationship between different races and religions in the borough? Atzmon was to appear at the venue as a saxophone player in a jazz group. It's hard to imagine a more severe inversion of the concept of discrimination. On the basis of the feelings of one complainant, the right of a musician to work or even be present in Islington is taken away.

What lies behind this is a familiar tactic. Zionists have no argument to counter critics of Israel, so they try to shut them up by attacking their character and robbing them of their livelihood. Now AIPAC and other lobbies are working to make it illegal to criticize Israel, as we see in the recent case of a Texas speech therapist whose yearly contract was denied because she refused to sign a pledge not to support a boycott of Israel. One might ask, what does a teaching position in Pflugerville, Texas have to do with one's opinions about a country seven thousand miles away? And why does that country have the right to compel anyone in the US to sign a loyalty oath?

If the BDS movement doesn't do it, zealotry and fanaticism will be the undoing of the Zionist project. People don't like being told what they are allowed to think and say. When our words and thoughts are policed, it makes us question all the more. What were once decent leftist positions against racism and discrimination have been twisted into a new kind of totalitarianism, one in which it is racist to question the racist, and discriminatory to question discrimination; one in which we are told to think something doesn't exist when we can see with our own eyes that it does. The self-righteous members of the Islington Town Council have set a very dangerous precedent, and have been used as fools on top of it.






calm

#1
If "Jewish" is a race and not a religion, then how can somebody convert to a race?
https://twitter.com/TorahJews/status/1077968973134741504

If Trump says that the U.S. is not a "Sucker" and will not be paying to protect countries around the globe, then when will Israel be receiving a bill?
https://twitter.com/jallawati/status/1078302884142465025


yankeedoodle

Quote from: calm on December 27, 2018, 03:06:06 PM
If Trump says that the U.S. is not a "Sucker" and will not be paying to protect countries around the globe, then when will Israel be receiving a bill? 

You know what, I was wondering about that in the last few days.  We just learned that the national debt in the US is $22 trillion https://www.rt.com/business/446355-us-debt-financial-crisis/, and, let's just suppose that the combined wealth of the Rothschilds, and their minions, might just be about $22 trillion.  But, if it isn't quite that much, I'm sure if you added in some "wealth" from Israhell's suddenly-not-so-hidden ally, Saudi Arabia, I'm sure that the US would, suddenly, be in a surplus.

Have to find a good bookkeeper, to get these books into balance.



 

maz