Will cyber war lead to nuclear war?

[yankeedoodle]

Mechanically translated from Russian.

There is no doubt that experienced cybersecurity analysts express in an "intelligent" manner the intentions of the core of the aggressive part of the American establishment, which, under the guise of the concept of containment of the "hot war" between the US and Russia, is promoting the most direct path to this "hot war".

After all, disabling the Internet is currently tantamount to the use of tactical nuclear weapons.

It must be clearly understood that the American intelligence services with a swarm of cyber-saboteurs serving them, both in uniform and "free enthusiasts", have already come up with and prepared many options for cyber provocations under the flag of Russia in order to start a large-scale cyber war against our country with strikes on the Internet and the entire critical infrastructure.

Under these conditions, the highest form of readiness for this type of cyber warfare must be introduced.     

In the US, everything is ready for a cyber attack against Russia to block the Internet
under the guise of containment, a "hot war" is coming?
https://zavtra.ru/blogs/v_ssha_vsyo_gotovo_dlya_kiberataki_protiv_rossii_s_tcel_yu_blokirovat_internet

On April 14, 2022, The Washington Post published an article by Dmitry Alperovich (co-founder and chairman of Silverado Policy Accelerator, and co-founder and former CTO of cybersecurity company CrowdStrike) and Samuel Charap (senior political scientist at RAND Corporation) "Russian cyber attacks may be coming. What is what is the optimal response strategy?

It notes that in March the White House issued its strongest warning that "updating" intelligence indicates that Moscow is planning major cyber operations against the United States in retaliation for the economic sanctions the country has imposed on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. It may only be a matter of time before these warnings become reality.

"Even before the start of the war, cybersecurity experts predicted that the likelihood of Russian cyber operations against the West would increase," the authors write, "as the United States and its allies impose tougher economic sanctions against Moscow. Now, as the Russian economy begins to feel the effects of sanctions, Russian President Vladimir Putin appears ready to use his intelligence's considerable cyber capabilities to strike back at the West.

As these threats escalate, the US government, according to the authors, needs to make an important decision: how will it respond to the first wave of major cyberattacks from Russia? The most effective response would serve two potentially conflicting goals: deterring further attacks, but not dragging the US and Russia into a spiral of escalation that could lead to a hot war between the world's two largest nuclear powers. Designing a response that stops Russia and prevents further escalation will be a major challenge. But "a measured cyberattack on Moscow—accompanied by a clear message that the United States is ready to take even stronger action if Russia doesn't back down—could thread that needle."

According to American analysts, Russian cyberattacks could be very destructive for the United States and its allies. The Kremlin could target major Western financial institutions in retaliation for sanctions imposed on the Russian financial sector, a tactic Iran has used against the United States in the past. Russia can also launch attacks on US energy companies to disrupt oil and gas pipelines, refineries and storage facilities. Small energy companies are especially vulnerable, as they often lack the staff and resources to adequately protect even against hacks by criminals, let alone a Tier 1 state like Russia. As we saw with the May 2021 Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack, these types of attacks can cause significant power outages in the United States. rising gasoline prices and worsening inflation, both of which are already at historically high levels."

At the same time, the authors of the article believe that "Russia could deploy a similar scenario in Europe, targeting operators of liquefied natural gas terminals on the continent , which are critical to Europe's efforts to reduce dependence on Russian gas, in order to further raise already exorbitant prices. and inflict significant economic harm on European citizens."

At the urging of the US government, American companies are already taking steps to strengthen their security, "but nevertheless, some of the offensive operations of Russia," the authors write, "are likely to succeed. The Russian Cyber ​​Corps is a technologically advanced and experienced group, which they have demonstrated on numerous occasions, including the attack on an oil refinery in Saudi Arabia and the most devastating cyber attack in history in 2017 using NotPetya."

Analysts believe that "all this makes it important to develop a plan of action to deploy immediately after a potential first wave of successful Russian attacks. "There are no formal or even unwritten rules governing cyber conflict, which means that there is a real danger that the wrong answer could lead to a tit-for-tat spiral of escalation that could eventually go beyond cyberspace, which in the worst case -random scenario, could lead to nuclear war.

But the United States also cannot go unanswered by a major cyberattack on its critical infrastructure. Although US military strategy dictates that it is not necessary to limit the response to a cyber attack to cyberspace, this situation may be one case where an initial response to cyberspace may be appropriate. Cyber ​​is a specially crafted tool that can induce shock and awe without necessarily causing lasting destruction."

"It would be helpful to develop a response that could provide the Kremlin with a powerful demonstration of U.S. capabilities , while avoiding widespread disruption that could escalate."

Unlike sanctions or kinetic attacks, a carefully orchestrated cyberattack against specific targets is relatively easy to carry out and, more importantly, easy to complete without causing lasting damage.

"It would be to the advantage of the United States to develop a response that could convincingly demonstrate the capabilities of the United States to the Kremlin, but avoid massive destruction that could lead to escalation. Combined with a clear public and private message that the United States would go much further in the cyber arena if Russia attacked again, such a move would demonstrate America's determination, creating an opportunity for Moscow to turn back on its cyber aggression."

One such measured response, according to the authors of the article, "could be a cyber operation that will lead to a large-scale, but short-term disruption of the Internet throughout Russia. Such an attack, which is within the capabilities of US Cyber ​​Command , would be a prime example of what the United States is capable of. It will also show the Kremlin leadership what life would be like for government officials, businesses, and ordinary citizens without an Internet connection. Like all advanced economies, Russia is dependent on the Internet, and even temporary power outages lasting no more than an hour or two will affect every sector of the Russian economy, from energy to media to national defense.Yet a short-term failure that does not cause permanent damage is less likely to lead to further escalation.

Such an approach is not a reliable defense against a second Russian attack, which would require larger and more destructive actions. But it makes it possible to avoid an escalation spiral."

***

There is no doubt that experienced cybersecurity analysts express in an "intelligent" manner the intentions of the core of the aggressive part of the American establishment, which, under the guise of the concept of containment of the "hot war" between the US and Russia, is promoting the most direct path to this "hot war".

After all, disabling the Internet is currently tantamount to the use of tactical nuclear weapons.

It must be clearly understood that the American intelligence services with a swarm of cyber-saboteurs serving them, both in uniform and "free enthusiasts", have already come up with and prepared many options for cyber provocations under the flag of Russia in order to start a large-scale cyber war against our country with strikes on the Internet and the entire critical infrastructure.

Under these conditions, the highest form of readiness for this type of cyber warfare must be introduced.

[abduLMaria]

The Civil War which started on 9-11 when American Jews allowed 2900 Gentiles to be murdered by Israhell, has certainly escalated.

I now have the US government or a related 'bad actor' interfering in both my bank account access, and my access to health care, and other online stuff.

All post Covid19.

Chase won't let me log in, even with "2 levels of security", i.e. me calling the 800 number and answering questions about addresses - Plural - + mother's maiden name, etc.

There is something very wierd going on.

At the same time, I have posted about 100,000 times on Facebook and other media about Israel's involvement in 9-11.

Without more data, I don't know if there is a general shut-down going on, or just me online being targeted.

Of course, if my name was put on a Terrorist Watch List - basically for doing an effective & thorough job criticizing the US government - that might explain some of the incidents.

Long story short, for any TIU members that are really Vocal about criticizing IsraHell and their lapdogs, I highly recommend air-gapping your computers, and other security measures that Ognir could probably describe better.


Either way, the Jews are on the War-path.

One of the other things they did starting in January 2014, is to restrict access to pain medications for all Gentiles who have "poor person's health care" - e.g. Medicare.

This is done largely by computer, so it certainly has a 'cyber' element.

This comes out over and over, e.g. talking to some young person at the hardware store.  He and his girlfriend are living in a garage, and she can't obtain the prescription pain medication she normally took.  Because her doctor is afraid of filling out forms for the DEA, for low-profit customers.

Bottom line, if you need pain medications in the US for legit medical reasons, the cost went up from about $200 a year in 2013, to the range of $20K to $50K a year.  More for older people.

You basically have to subscribe to one of those 'concierge health services'.

[yankeedoodle]

One of the other things they did starting in January 2014, is to restrict access to pain medications for all Gentiles who have "poor person's health care" - e.g. Medicare.

This is done largely by computer, so it certainly has a 'cyber' element.

This comes out over and over, e.g. talking to some young person at the hardware store.  He and his girlfriend are living in a garage, and she can't obtain the prescription pain medication she normally took.  Because her doctor is afraid of filling out forms for the DEA, for low-profit customers.

Bottom line, if you need pain medications in the US for legit medical reasons, the cost went up from about $200 a year in 2013, to the range of $20K to $50K a year.  More for older people.

You basically have to subscribe to one of those 'concierge health services'.

You can thank the jew Sackler family for this, because they pushed opioids on Americans and killed hundreds of thousands with overdoses.

Years ago, it was difficult to get pain killers, because of the addiction risk.  That changed, and the Sacklers exploited the change to become billionaires and kill Americans.  Oh, well. 

So, now, thanks to the greedy jews, things are back to the old ways: hard to get pain killers, even if you need it.  (Don't know this personally, but based on what you say.)

I moved into my little town a few years ago - opioids are a problem - and went to the local doctor to see about becoming a patient, and was greeted with hostility: doctors are afraid of new patients trying to get opioids. 

[abduLMaria]

I moved into my little town a few years ago - opioids are a problem - and went to the local doctor to see about becoming a patient, and was greeted with hostility: doctors are afraid of new patients trying to get opioids.

My own reaction to Sh-t for Health care, to use a woman friend's description of American "health" care -

I found out somewhat late in life that I'm skilled at Nuclear Science.

Knowing how little the US gov represents me,
I look OUTSIDE the US for Civilization.

So I share my Homework with the Open Source community.

This is what I call the "onion" geometry - Image 1.

Image 2 shows the Probability curve for Slow Neutrons, the probability of their being Absorbed by another U235 atom, causing a decay event, and the release of 2 or 3 more Neutrons.

In order to "push the design" so that (almost) every Neutron collides with a U235 atom, the Onion design uses a Moderator to slow down the Neutrons - so that the entire device operates in the upper left end of the Probability curve, where the probability of interaction (i.e. Absorption leading to the release of 2 or 3 neutrons) is literally a 1000+ times greater.

'Moderator' in this case sounds exotic, but as it turns out, all you need is a Hydrogen rich compound that doesn't have any Absorber qualities.  Polyethylene Plastic (C2H4)n, and Chewing gum, are 2 examples.

A 1 eV Neutron is travelling at 13.8 kilometers per second.  A .01 eV Neutron is travelling at (approx) 1.38 Neutrons per second.

A design that uses a Moderator in conjunction with Low enriched Uranium basically copies Chernobyl in its final 3 seconds, when it went beyond its rated heating of 3200 Megawatts, and the heat output increased to roughly 500 Gigawatts.


In "Conventional" Uranium bombs, the U235 atoms have a very low probability of interaction with a Neutron.  They overcome this by "brute-forcing" the design - and using highly enriched Uranium.


If American health care didn't suck - if the United States was actually a Civilization and not a Jewish Ghetto - if the FBI & CIA had worked to stop 9-11 - I would feel differently.

Everyone has their way of "fighting back" against a Sh-t Government.

Engaging in a quiet conversation with people outside the US about Nuclear Science, is part of my response to America's disintegrated civilization.


We already have a Worst Case - the world's most Violent terrorist organizations, the US & Israel, in possession of the H-Bomb.

So that completely alters the conversation about Nuclear proliferation.

Nuclear proliferation is a GOOD thing - it helps underdog nations like Pakistan and Turkey deal with their Psychopath neighbors, the US & Israel.

There is more to that story, involving the Kurds in Iraq.  The US/Israel are simultaneously attacking Pakistan and Turkey, using American supported groups in Afghanistan and Iraq, to force Pakistan & Turkey to back away from their relationship with Russia.


So yes I admit it's a bit of a stretch, from sh-t health care to Nuclear heating device design.