Memory legislation

[yankeedoodle]

MECHANICALLY TRANSLATED FROM FINNISH

Helsingin Sanomat demands that Russia introduce familiar Holocaust laws to Finland
In the end, Holocaust legislation becomes a shield with which an unjust government defines criticism of itself and, for example, its immigration policy as a crime.
https://www.partisaani.com/news/zionism/2023/07/20/helsingin-sanomat-vaatii-venajalta-tuttuja-holokaustilakeja-suomeen/

Helsingin Sanomat (HS), owned by the Jewish Erkko family https://www.partisaani.com/news/zionism/2021/09/04/kuka-omistaa-helsingin-sanomat/ , is demanding that cultural Marxist professor, Kimmo Nuotion , introduce Holocaust laws known from Russia and Germany, among others, to Finland. Under the laws restricting freedom of speech, citizens could be sentenced to severe punishments if they question the Soviet-made "evidence" of the German "genocide of the Jews" in World War II.

To this day, no first technical evidence has been found of the genocide of the Jews, or the "Holocaust" in the Second World War. Historians as well as the judges of the war crimes trials have had to admit that not a single body of the Jews murdered with Zyklon-B gas has yet been found.

It has not been possible to locate documents about the Holocaust orders given by Adolf Hitler or other National Socialist leaders. Instead, documents about medical operations performed in Auschwitz to save Jewish lives, for example, have been found in huge quantities. All the wartime prison camps labeled as "extermination camps" were located in the territories occupied by the Soviet Union, where Western historians had no business for decades. This made it possible for Stalin's propaganda machine to have the exclusive right to write the "history" of the extermination camps, which is now also taught outside the former Soviet Union as the only truth.

"Memory legislation"
"Criminalizing Holocaust denial would also suit Finland," the HS article states. The text continues: "Sometimes it seems that the nature of the limits of the use of freedom of speech is not fully understood in Finland. Freedom of speech is also invoked on wrong grounds."

The article also declares: "When Europe rose from the ashes after the Second World War, the defense of human rights, human dignity and equality was taken as a common value base. The criminalization of Holocaust denial shows that we are committed by our values ​​to defending equal human dignity. At the same time, in practice, the rise of such schools of thought that reject this value base can be curbed. The ban is principled and therefore absolute."

In practice, HS therefore admits that the goal of the criminalization of the critical study of the "Holocaust", i.e. the so-called memory legislation, is to promote cultural Marxist and multicultural values. "Holocaust" is a political horse for the owners of the Jewish media group, with which they want to ensure that Finland will never again become a strong and independent nation-state that pursues the ethnic interests of its own population.

Questioning Stalin's propaganda is a crime
The thought-crime legislation promoted by HS is known, for example, from Russia, where Vladimir Putin banned the questioning of the "Holocaust" in 2014. Today, in Russia, you can receive a prison sentence of up to five years if you make the mistake of making critical comments about the conflicting Holocaust stories of Stalin's propaganda machine, which include, in addition to the gas chambers, the ones used to murder Jews conveyor belts and futuristic electrifying weapons .

It is telling that France was the first in Europe to criminalize the suspicion of the "Holocaust" in 1990 at the initiative of the well-known communist politician Jean-Claude Gayssot . Along with Zionists, specifically communists and admirers of the former Soviet Union have been the most ardent proponents of Holocaust legislation in recent European history, because they believe that Germany's alleged war crimes justify (with some strange logic) Stalin's genuine atrocities.

Of course, HS does not want to underline the communist and Stalinist roots of Holocaust legislation. Instead, the paper appeals to the "European constitutional tradition", "human rights" and "human dignity" in pathetic terms.

The Holocaust is the shield of the globalist rulers against criticism
In 2016, the respected international relations magazine Foreign Policy (FP) published a series of articles warning that Holocaust legislation can in practice act as a Trojan horse that broadly limits political freedoms. According to FP, limiting critical thinking related to the Holocaust is in itself easy to justify with moralistic arguments, but "it is clear that the construction of memory legislation has had unpredictable effects [in terms of political freedoms] both in the European Union and outside it".

FP also highlighted the double moralism related to the "memory legislation". While questioning alleged crimes against Jews is strictly forbidden, denying the Armenian Genocide, for example, is permitted. With the thought crime legislation, the Jewish race has been put on a pedestal compared to other nations, which certainly suits better than a tribe that calls itself the "chosen people".

The FP continued its criticism of the Holocaust legislation by stating that the current governments can effectively define themselves as continuing the work started by the Allies in World War II. Like the Western Green Left, for example, Vladimir Putin has profiled himself as an international pioneer of the "war against Nazism". In this case, criticism of the mainstream Holocaust narrative and criticism of the current government are mixed in legislation and jurisprudence in a dangerous way.

In the end, Holocaust legislation becomes a shield with which an unjust government defines criticism of itself and, for example, its immigration policy as a crime. Undoubtedly, this is exactly the goal of globalist politicians and hateful fake media like Helsingin Sanomat.

Sources:
https://www.hs.fi/mielipide/art-2000009719653.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20161003164906/https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/02/first-they-came-for-the-holocaust-deniers-and-i-did-not-speak-out/

https://web.archive.org/web/20160505094125/https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/17/europes-free-speech-apocalypse-is-already-here-france-germany-spain/

https://web.archive.org/web/20160708122523/https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/07/europes-freedom-of-speech-fail/

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-putin-nazi-law-idUSBREA440IV20140505

https://humanityinaction.org/knowledge_detail/memory-laws-in-france-and-their-implications-institutionalizing-social-harmony/?lang=nl