"Without Prejudice"

[Anonymous]

Excerpt from "Without Prejudice" by Jim Townsend

://gentiledefenseleague.net/

"We need to examine what the Crown is and how it relates to us as Canadians. The Crown is the Anglican Church and the head of the Anglican Church is always the British Monarch. Somehow this foreigner who is the head of a foreign church is supposed to be our head of state. I didn't even elect her supposed representatives to me in what is called the "Canadian Government", never mind her. Free people are self-governing, not controlled by a foreign church.
 
My non-vote in Canadian elections is a conscious decision as a free man in a free country to not be represented by any of them, subject to them, or any part of their misadventures. The largest block of people in the last vote were the ones that did not vote for any government representatives. If democracy defers to the majority in our country, why do we still have these "governments" that the MAJORITY of us don't want?
 
Armies adopt two postures; offensive and defensive. If they are at home they are on the defensive. If they are away from home, they are on the offensive. While many Canadians believe that Canadians control their Armed Forces this is not the truth. If you look in the Canadian Criminal code under Interpretations, you will find the following definition for the Canadian Armed Forces; "her majesties forces raised by Canada".
 
Her Majesty is sending Canadians out on offensive actions in other countries to kill people defending their own countries. But consider this foreign ownership of "our Armed Forces" a little further. Does this mean "Canada's Army" is actually a foreign force standing on our own soil that is made up of our own sons? They do swear allegiance to the Head of the Anglican Church and her family. I don't think I want my son or daughter in the army or police pointing a firearm in my direction in defence of a foreign powers divine right to steal everything he is supposed to inherit.
 
Since I live in Canada, my examination always focuses back to the British Crown. In Canada we are told we are a free nation of free people. Yet for some strange reason, a person living in a foreign country is our "head of state". Apparently this Jewish God and the Archbishop of the Anglican Church gave Elizabeth the right to rule over we free people of Canada.
 
If I look in Black's Law Dictionary, I can see the definition of Free; "not subject to the legal constraint of another." Another word for "legal constraint" is legislation and look at that word "subject".
 
It is easy to see from the definition of free that LEGISLATION IS SLAVERY. Slaves are subject to dominion by others, are they not? How can we believe we are FREE and SUBJECTS? Gee Golly, we're virgin sluts! Obviously mutually exclusive states exist in both of these samples. This is NOT logical.
 
Why does it make a difference to me? Well you see, all my life I have been compelled to stand and pledge my true patriot love to the true north strong and FREE. All of my life I have been told I am a FREE man and that generations of my fellow countrymen spilled their blood, lost their lives on cold foreign shores, their dreams in a nightmare of hellish proportion for the sole reason of ensuring their fellow countrymen and their children would be FREE.
 
In silent contemplation all of us have stood in honour of their sacrifice and thought, if only for a moment; "what a folly is this". We have fed the lifeblood of our children to the very beast that enslaves us for no other reason than to secure for them a life of fear and misery and their certain fate as slaves.
 
Free people in free societies do not live in constant fear of breaking the legislation imposed by foreign powers and being compelled to ecclesiastical inquisition Star Chamber courts in the name of a phony and un-elected "head of state". Free men and free nations are self-governing. Canada cannot be both FREE and a DOMINION. It is either self-governing or the dominion of this Anglican Church, but IT IS NOT BOTH.
 
All properties in commonwealth countries are held in "fee simple". The church actually owns all the land as the Crown and the feudal serfs are given ownership of the "fee simple" which allows them to sell the rights to use the surface of the property and pay taxes to the church for it. Whenever you have a Monarch as the head of state having dominion over all the lands, you have feudalism; a misbegotten piece of flotsam left over from the dark ages.
 
Feudalism exists in all of the commonwealth countries and all lands are held in a similar manner. Go down to your local land titles office and see if you are merely the "owner in fee simple". This includes the United States."
 
It strikes me as funny that Americans believe their ancient enemy that slaughtered the original Americans simply decided to go home. The intended name for America was the Commonwealth of New Israel, but things never quite worked out as the British planned. They still managed to conquer the fledgling nation by subjecting Americans to their banking and legal systems. You will find evidence of this all over America.

://gentiledefenseleague.net/