The “Jesuits” Hoax

[joeblow]

The "Jesuits" Hoax
By: ZionCrimeFactory

http://zioncrimefactory.wordpress.com/2 ... uits-hoax/



Anyone who has been involved in "truth seeking" for some time now is sure to have come across the people who will try to convince you that the Jesuit Order (aka Society of Jesus) are really at the top of this worldwide crime network. These people will relentlessly and tirelessly attempt to fill your head with ideas that the Jesuits of Rome really run the show from behind the scenes and that everything else is "disinformation". This theory seems to have become more popular and far reaching on the internet and you will see more and more people parroting this stuff loud and clear to anyone who will naively listen. I am going to show you that not only is this theory complete bunk nonsense that is popular primarily amongst crazies, nutjobs, Jews, and Jew defenders, but that the Jesuits are actually crypto-Jews. So even if this ridiculous theory were true, it would still mean that the Jews are and always have been behind this global criminal cabal.
Who Promotes this Theory and Why?

First let us discuss the very people who promote this nonsense and analyze them to see if it gives us any indications of what their motives might be. The biggest and most popular promoter of this stuff is a guy named Eric John Phelps who wrote a pathetic book called Vatican Assassins in which he makes a series of superfluously unsubstantiated claims alleging that the Vatican & the Jesuits run the world and is behind everything from JFK assassination to 9/11. This book is pretty much a 99.99% made up lie.
Lying Skum

Eric Jon Phelps - Liar, Skumbag

This pathetic piece of garbage literally makes shit up as he goes along and has no sources to back any of his claims up. Unsurprisingly he was taken to school in a debate vs. Michael Collins Piper, author of the great book Final Judgment. Eric Phelps has a ridiculously palpable connection that clearly illustrates why he promotes this garbage. On his website under the donations section it asks for all money orders to be sent to the address of LOWVEHM Inc., the company he runs. Now if you go to the LOWVEHM website you will quickly see that it is a diamond and jewels company that receives its diamonds wholesale straight from Tel Aviv, Israel! So the guy's income is dependent on Israeli Blood Diamonds and he blames the Jesuits for everything. Need I say any more? I shouldn't have to but I will. Not only does this Israeli diamond thing make he look like a total shill for the Jews but he admitted that his wife is a Russian Jew and that he is a Christian Zionist himself. He also smears anyone who doesn't agree with his nonsense by calling them a "Jesuit Coadjutor" (which is just a pathetic made up fictional term). There is plenty more dirt on the guy that can be found HERE but this is just so over-the-top obvious that I am gobsmacked that anyone actually takes anything this guy says seriously. You have to be incredulously stupid, or a Jew to promote this guy and his conspiracy theories about the Jesuits running the world. We're done with him, he deserves no more attention, and please, nobody ever bring up this con-artist to me ever again.

Why is it that Phelps' paypal account works just fine, when anybody who says anything about Jews on their website gets their paypal immediately shut down? The answer is obvious, the Jesuits don't run squat. Other than that freak, the people who usually promote the Jesuits stuff are either Jews, Christian Zionists, or just kooks who are bored with blaming the obvious culprits and are looking for a "cool" / "interesting" conspiracy theory to fantasize about in their basements while jerking off to gay porn all day. I've chatted with quite a few of these people on youtube and other places and if you take a look at their profiles they promote pretty much anything that sounds crazy & far-out like the "No Planes" and "Space Beams" on 9/11 theories. Why do a majority of them also promote that stuff as well? Because they are just crazy conspiracy theorists looking for something "interesting" to obsess about when they are not playing World Of Warcraft on their mom's computers.
The Jesuits are in fact Jewish

One of the most devastating things to the notion that the Jesuits are at the top of this thing is the fact that more than a lot of the Jesuits are in fact Jewish. The Jesuit Order is in reality a Jewish Order masquerading as a Catholic one as a cover, so even if they were at the top it's still a Jewish conspiracy.
"We Jesuits take pleasure in admitting those of Jewish ancestry." J. Nadal Morey

"We Jesuits take pleasure in admitting those of Jewish ancestry." - J. Nadal Morey

An excellent resource documenting all the so called Jesuits who are really Jews turned Catholic, hence "crypto-Jews", can be found at JewishJesuits.com.The Jesuit Order in its founding was very much Jewish. All five of its founding members were Marrano Jews (i.e. Jews masquerading as Christians).
Ignatius Loyola - Founder of the Jesuit Order (JEW)

Ignatius Loyola - Founder of the Jesuit Order (Jewish)
Alfonso Salmeron - Jewish

Alfonso Salmeron - Jewish
Diego Lainez - Jewish

Diego Lainez - Jewish
Nicolas Bodadilla - Jewish

Nicolas Bodadilla - Jewish
Simao Rodriguez

Simao Rodriguez - Jewish

In his article Synagogue of Satan, John S. Torell states:

    "In 1491 San Ignacio De Loyola was born in the Basque province of Guipuzcoa, Spain. His parents were Marranos and at the time of his birth the family was very wealthy. As a young man he became a member of the Jewish Illuminati Order in Spain. As a cover for his crypto Jewish activities, he became very active as a Roman Catholic."

Marranos are Spanish Jews who outwardly converted to a different religion, often times Roman Catholic, in order to evade persecution and expulsion for their treacherous actions, while secretly maintaining the religion of Judaism as well as practicing the Cabbala (Jewish Mystisism).

Furthermore, Loyola's secretary, Polanco, was also of Jewish descent and was the only person present at Loyola's deathbed. James Lainez who succeeded Loyola as the second Jesuit General was also of Jewish descent.(#) Add a (W) after the (E) in Jesuits and what do you get? Jewsuits. A more fitting name.

It's quite funny how the promoters in the "Jesuits run it all" theories conveniently fail to mention these important facts and attempt to project the Jesuits as purely Roman Catholic. And these skumbags also have the audacity to call us "anti-Semites" while promoting blatantly anti-Catholic conspiracy theories with no facts in hand at all. The Jesuits themselves are crypto-Jews and so are the promoters in the Black Pope theories. The Jews disguise themselves as the religion of their enemies, continue with their treachery under this false guise, and then get everybody to blame their disguise for the world's problems. Ingenious
The Pope Wears a Yarmulke

Jewish infiltration of the Vatican stems back many hundreds of years, and it would be safe to say that the Jews have a strong vice-grip over that institution, from the inside out. One of the most blatant examples of the Jewishness of the Vatican is the fact that the Pope himself wears a fricken Yarmulke.
Why is the pope wearing a Yarmulke? Please explain.

Why is the pope wearing a Yarmulke? Please explain.
The Pope Sucks Up to Israel
Pope Benedict w/ Shimon Peres and Bibi Netanyahu

Pope Benedict w/ Peres & Netanyahu

Pope Benedict has made several visits to Israel where he blatantly sucks up to them and praises them.
Jews Demonize the Vatican
Agent of Israel

Agent of Israel

There are multiple instances where Israel and Jews have attempted to demonize the Vatican when they aren't co-operative or subservient to their will. One example is the Jewish-controlled mass media going on a massive demonization campaign against Catholic priests (i.e. Jesuits) with accusations of pedophilia and Satanism. While some of these accusations have proven to be true, many of these claims could easily be embellished or fabricated by the Jewish-controlled mass media when the Vatican does something the Jews don't like — for instance when the Vatican strongly OPPOSED the Iraq war. Blackmail anyone? And whose to say that these Pedophiles and Satanists in the Catholic Church aren't just crypto-Jews? To boot, the man who came out with a lot of those accusations was Fr. Malachai Martin who is a ex-Jesuit Zionist who, during the second Vatican Council, drafted the document which exonerated the Jews from culpability in the execution of Jesus Christ. So, the man who writes books claiming the Catholic Church is full of pedophiles and Satanists is a Zionist who exonerates the Jews for murdering Jesus. Go figure.

Another more recent example of Jews trying to demonize the Vatican in the press was this story about how a pamphlet that was being passed out to the IDF troops in Israel claimed that the Vatican was training Hezbollah how to kill Jews.

It is redundantly obvious that the Vatican is infiltrated and blackmailed by Jews which utterly puts to shame any notion that the "Jesuits" control anything let alone Israel and Jews. It's the other way around.
Who Controls the Vatican Treasure?

The Jewish Encyclopedia (Vol. 2, p. 497) admits that...

    "A number of Catholics undertook to organize a competitor bank to rival the Rothschild power... sometime about 1830. The Rothschild's crushed it."

It says further:

    "It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the Rothschilds that at the present time (1905) the latter are the guardians of the papal treasure." (#)

So the Jewish Rothschild banking dynasty controls the Vatican treasure.
They Cannot Explain Away Bishop Williamson
Truth Hero

Bishop Williamson - Truth Hero

If the Jesuits are so bad and evil than how do you explain Bishop Richard Williamson? Catholic Bishop (Jesuit) Richard Williamson is a great man who has valiantly publicly stated that 9/11 was a fraud, a lie, and that the holocaust was also a lie. Many of these Black Popers will shy away from any reference of Bishop Williamson and nary a mention of one of his excellent sermons exposing 9/11 among other crimes. I have even heard some pathetic cretins say he is "controlled opposition" like stuppering little maggots. These cowards won't hesitate to defame a person who has more courage in his fingernail than they have in their entire bodies. Bishop Williamson puts his very livelihood and safety on the line when he speaks out about these subjects. Soulless cockroaches who attack him because he puts to shame this "Jesuit Conspiracy" claim are a complete waste of oxygen.
Conclusion

Do Jesuits control the Media, own Hollywood, the Federal Reserve, and constantly inhabit high positions in government? Nope. Have Jesuits been expelled from 109 locations since 250 AD? Nope. Did Jesuits run the African Slave trade, instigate WWI & WWII, invent Communism & Neo-Conservatism, perpetrate the 9/11 attacks, attack the U.S.S. Liberty, assassinate JFK, run the Diamond District, Porn Industry, run the Drug Trade? Nope. Are you called "anti-Catholic" for blaming Jesuits for everything under the sun that they don't even do? Nope, but we're called anti-Semitic for blaming the people which ALL of the evidence shows are the ones responsible.

Any further discussion of this topic is a complete and utter waste of time. In fact that is the whole point of this Jesuits stuff is... to waste your time. It is just another Jewish distraction that people like to point at to cover for the Jewish crime network. It is no different than blaming the Bilderbergers, CFR, the Illuminati, or the New World Order. The sad thing is that the people who believe in this stuff think they are "awake" and "in the know" and that everybody else is being "fooled" and "led astray". These type of people are bordering on mental illness. Do not talk to them, do not humor their nonsense, just laugh and scoff at their unpragmatic junk conspiracy theory.

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

    * The Zionists or The Jews?
    * The shills are getting desperate.
    * Bobby Fischer
    * Should Pope Pius XII Become a Saint?

[Rockclimber]

Excellent job to zioncrimefactory, I pdf'd that find piece of work. Also read this

 http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/piperphelps.html

Analysis: Piper-Phelps Debate
by Victor Thorn
   
     

On May 16, 2006 Michael Collins Piper faced-off against Eric Jon Phelps on RBN Live in what was termed "The Great Debate". In actuality, this debate was so one-sided in Mr. Piper's favor that if seen in boxing terms, it would have been ruled a "unanimous decision."

As we said in yesterday's preview of this debate, we like and have interviewed both participants – Piper and Phelps – and this analysis should in no way be seen as a slight against either man. That is not my intent. But Piper's mastery of facts – especially in regard to the JFK assassination – so outshone Phelps' various stances that there is no other way to frame the debate.

So, since I mentioned this subject, let's examine what unfolded in terms of John F. Kennedy's murder. As Piper stated at one point in the debate, Vatican Assassins hinges on the theory that the Jesuits were behind JFK's assassination; but he relates that at least 50% of the information Phelps provides was error-prone and just plain "wrong wrong wrong."

Piper even went so far as to say that he read Vatican Assassins in its entirety over the past weekend, and "more often than not it had so many errors in regard to the JFK assassination that it led him to question everything else he had written."

On top of that, Piper conveys how Phelps relied on a number of biased sources for his documentation, including Dr. Emmanuel Josephson (a known disinformation agent) and John Loftus (a Zionist propagandist).

To his credit, Phelps rightly admitted that he had been mistaken on the JFK assassination, and that he didn't understand Kennedy's war with Israel. This revelation was huge, because one of the fundamental premises of Vatican Assassins was that Cardinal Spellman and the Jesuits masterminded this crime. But Phelps admitted he was wrong, and that he now intended to update the third edition of Vatican Assassins to include this material.

Piper then questioned Phelps by asking, "If the Jesuits considered JFK to be such a good friend of Israel, then why would they have the Mossad kill him?" Piper called this premise forwarded by Phelps "illogical," for Phelps himself also admitted the Mossad's role in killing Kennedy.

Furthermore, Phelps stated in Vatican Assassins that one of the key figures in Kennedy's assassination – Clay Shaw – was a Knight of Malta. But the only sources available to document this crucial point are all people reflecting back on Phelps' book using him as the source. Phelps also claimed that CIA director John McCone worked in unison with James Jesus Angleton to murder Kennedy. But Piper retorted (unequivocally) that this point didn't stand, for McCone was a close personal friend of the Kennedy family, and that is why he was appointed CIA director after Kennedy fired Allen Dulles. Plus, Kennedy directed McCone to do all his intelligence work separately from Angleton (who he didn't trust), especially in regard to Israel. So, even though McCone was a Knight of Malta, he certainly didn't plot to kill Kennedy.

In reality, the main premise of Michael Collins Piper's Final Judgment still stands – that Kennedy was assassinated because of a secret, behind-the-scenes war with Israel over their clandestine plans to develop nuclear weapons. During the course of this debate, Phelps revealed that he felt this scenario was accurate, and that he would incorporate it into his future work.

A final note on this subject: Phelps explained at one point how he felt the Black Pope was in charge of illegal drug trafficking and the Mafia; but Piper countered with the fact that Sam Giancana's son recently wrote in two different books that the very clear head of organized crime in Chicago was a Jewish man named Hyman Larner, who was a partner of Meyer Lansky. Lansky was the real head of organized crime, and he was Jewish, not a Jesuit agent. And Sam Giancana, as we all know, had obvious links to the Kennedy assassination, and he worked for the Jewish Lansky.

In all, Piper concluded – almost half-jokingly – that Vatican Assassins could almost be seen as a "put-up job" in regard to the Kennedy assassination.

Surprisingly, Phelps didn't credibly contend, object to, argue with, or dismiss even one point Piper made throughout the debate. Instead, what Phelps seemed to do too often was string together a slew of dates, countries, names, and biblical references that were never qualified by substantive (or significant) facts. An example would be as such: in 1832 a Bavarian Archbishop named XYZ said blah blah blah. Then he'd quote the Book of Revelations about a great city on the hill, gentiles, and Roman rule. In all honesty, though, all these obscure references started to make my head spin and I was having trouble following his train of thought.

Piper even addressed this issue by saying that he couldn't have a serious debate if it was all based on one man's interpretation of the Bible (precisely because there are so many different interpretations), especially where the Book of Revelations is concerned. Instead, he said their exchanges should be based on facts, not interpretations.

There was also quite a bit of discussion during this two-hour debate on subjects other than the JFK assassination, and what follows are a few other observations that Piper made which seriously questioned the Jesuit/Vatican's supposed role as controllers of the New World Order.

ONE: If the Roman Catholic power base in America is so inordinately strong, then why is abortion still legal? Remember, Catholics have been adamant in their opposition to abortion, so don't you think it would be outlawed?

TWO: Phelps stated that the CFR and ADL were subordinates of the Jesuit order (in the past with Cardinal Spellman, and now with Archbishop Egan). Piper replied that such an assertion was "a lot of nonsense" for the CFR is a division of the Rothschild Empire and serves as the American branch of England's RIIA (Royal Institute of International Affairs). In addition, Piper continued, the Rothschilds are not an adjunct of the Jesuits, and any argument to the contrary "falls on its illogical face."

THREE: Piper also said that Phelps assertion that the ADL was an agent of the Jesuits "falls flat" because the ADL stands virtually in direct opposition to nearly every stance of the Catholic Church.

FOUR: Also, any examination of mainstream media ownership will reveal that it's not the Jesuits who are in control of the major networks and magazines, but some very powerful Jewish families.

FIVE: If the Jesuits truly ran the world and its war machine, then why were the Pope and Catholic Church so adamantly in opposition to the Iraqi War, while Israel and the Zionists were 100% behind it (even promoting it with zealous glee)? If the Vatican was such a driving force, wouldn't Catholics have supported the war? Plus, is this the real reason why Catholic priest sex scandals were finally exposed after so many years – as retaliation by the Zionists for their vocal opposition to the war?

SIX: Finally, why can The Washington Post freely ask if there are too many Catholics on the Supreme Court; but if they asked if there were too many Jews in Bush's cabinet, the Israel Lobby would raise holy hell until the end of eternity?

In all, Piper concluded at various points during the debate that Phelps' claims that Israel and the Rothschilds were shills of the Jesuits was "absolutely extraordinary," that he made "egregious errors based on pro-Zionist sources," that the problem with Phelps was that "so many crimes are attributed to the Jesuits, but nothing could be further from the truth," and that "the Jesuits are not the substantial influence in this country; the Zionists are."

[scorpio]

I was listening to an interview with EJ Phelps yammering about his Vatican Assassins book. They were talking about the Russian revolution and the Bolsheviks. According to Phelps, it was the JESUITS, not jews. A Russian guy called in and said that was BS. He lived in communist Russia and said that Jews were behind the whole thing.
Phelps called him delusional. :lol: