The Eternal Jewish Victim, - I have a theory -

[R. Zuercher]

The Eternal Jewish Victim, - I have a theory -

It is human instinct, inborn in every child of every human race, to pretend to be hurt before it starts to hurt. The child starts to cry to stop a possible punishment even before anything has happened. It is a protective mechanism that has the sole purpose to prevent
pain from being inflicted. As child we all have used this technique, it works!

Because the average none-psychopath human being tends to take side for the weaker fellow, that is being assaulted and being beat up on by a superior assailant.

This is a human characteristic, an awesome powerful and most effective tool to fool the attacker. And it is this very tool that has been used in an extremely successful way by the Jews, to achieve a tremendous advantage over the rest of humanity, for thousands of years.

The most famous duel between Goliath and David comes to mind. Could it be that a similar stunt was pulled by David, perpetrated on Goliath, rather than, as the story goes the deceiving trick with the rock, that actually was a piece of cheese? Both are cowardice and despicable!

This is the main reason why they are getting away literally with murder, or more to the point of reality, with genocide? Just scream anti-Semite and holocaust loud enough when some fellow Jew,
well positioned in the UN, tries to fool us Goys with a well and cleverly in the Jew's favorite written report pretending to teach them Jews a lesson by "condemning" them for some war-crimes that may have taken place in Gaza at one time or another.

Pay attention; every time the world dares to even remotely take a stand against the Jewish criminal
behavior, whether this be for the Palestinians or should that be against their blatant openly call for war against any of their enemies, you will branded as an anti-Semite, a Jew-hater, or a white supremacist or worse. Because they, the Jewish holocaust traumatized People, are "the victims" whom are only defending themselves against the enemy, all of whom are out to wipe them, the Jews, of the face of the earth.

Immediately everybody backs off, feels so sorry for them and turns on who ever the Jew's enemy may supposed to be at the time. The trick works every time and as I mentioned earlier, it has worked for literally thousands of years.

They must always be the victims, because they know well, that it lies deeply in normal human nature, to prefer and pamper the victims and give them preferred treatment and all the sympathy to comfort their "sufferings". And the Jews have refined this simple technique to an art, where they can afford themselves to openly commit the most heinous crimes on Humanity, while claiming victim-hood and ask for reparations.

Somewhat more to the point is a small essay, that I wrote a few years ago, and which will follow this, to better demonstrate and substantiate my theory, which I call "The Victim Theory":

"They scream, while they stab their victims in their backs, and they must scream louder than their victims, so that only their own scream will be heard, because THEY MUST AND ONLY THEY THEMSELVES CAN BE THE VICTIMS!"

Just observe, not watch, observe all major News Networks, and you will notice how the
"Victim Theory" works!

Or you can look at Israel and look what (insert the name of the psychopath in charge at the time when you are reading this), is doing with the Palestinian people, bombing them with the most modern, American made Gun Ship Helicopters and F-16's, while screaming as loud that the whole world can hear it; "Suuuuuiiiicccciiiddddeeee Boooommmbbbbeeeerrrsss", inflicting impressions in an unsuspected, brainwashed American's mind, by overwhelming their minds, showing the drama of flashing lights of scores of Ambulances and emergency-personnel rushing over the TV-screens in every American Household, with scenes of blood and destruction every where, while at the same time, you hear or see nothing reported on the Palestinian side, where the real destruction and genocide is taking place.
That is called, applying the "Victim Theory" successfully!

That is and has been the Jewish tactic since centuries, and is just now being recognized by the people, the Goyim of the world. And this is very inconvenient for the Zionist-Jews and in fact could even become danger to their cause, could severely interfere with their Master-plan, the final implementation of the 24 Protocols, which they still claim and scream, to be a myth or an anti-Semitic slender against them. Myth or not myth, forgery or not, a while back, some one said "The Shoe Fits"! And the Shoe fit, when the Protocols first turned up and it fits even better today!

So watch out for the "Victim Theory", and wait for a loud scream from Jews, within or from without Israel, then you know, that some poor Goy fellows or even a whole innocent Nation are being beat up on! Wanna bet?

R. Zuercher/November 2009

[creativity]

Yes, it is said the jew crys while he is hitting you.

Yes the protocols are real and they have not been disproven.

As a result of their rapidly growing fame, numerous attempts were made to discredit the
Protocols as a forgery. But it was not until 1933 that the Jews resorted to legal action. On
26th June, 1933, the Federation of Jewish Communities of Switzerland and the Berne
Jewish Community brought an action against five members of the Swiss National Front,
seeking a judgment that the Protocols were a forgery and a prohibition of their
publication.1 The procedure of the Court was astounding, the provisions of the Swiss
Civil Code being deliberately set aside. Sixteen witnesses called by the plaintiffs were
heard, but only one of the forty witnesses called by the defendants was allowed a hearing.
The judge allowed the plaintiffs to appoint two private stenographers to keep the register
of proceedings during the hearing of their witnesses, instead of entrusting the task to a
Court official.
In view of these and similar irregularities, it was not surprising that, after the case had
lasted just on two years, the Court pronounced the Protocols to be a forgery and
demoralising literature. The decision was given on 14th May, 1935, but it was announced
in the Jewish Press before it was delivered by the Court I
  On 1st November, 1937, the Swiss Court of Criminal Appeal quashed this judgment in
its entirety. Jewish propagandists, however, still declare that the Protocols have been
"proved" to be a forgery.

From page 76 of Waters Flowing Eastward

[Christopher Marlowe]

Creativity's note about the protocols reminds me of a more recent courtroom error committed in the case where a man named Mermelstein sued the IHR over the holycost.  

• ver Labor Day weekend in 1979, the Institute for Historical Review held its very first conference at Northrop University in Los Angeles. At that time, the Institute announced its offer of a reward of $50,000 to the first person to prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz.

A little over a year later, in the spring of 1981, Mel Mermelstein, a southern California businessman and self-described Holocaust survivor, claimed that reward, and then sued the Institute for $17 million.  [Because that is 340 X $50,000. ed.]

On October 9, 1981, in response to a motion by Mermelstein, Judge Thomas Johnson of the Superior Court of California in Los Angeles declared:

    Under Evidence Code Section 452(h), this court does take judicial notice of the fact that Jews were gassed to death at the Auschwitz Concentration Camp in Poland during the summer of 1944.... It is not reasonably subject to dispute, and it is capable of immediate and accurate determination by resort to sources of reasonably indisputable accuracy. It is simply a fact.

Because of the prejudicial effect of this action, the IHR decided not to proceed with the suit, and instead settled the matter by signing a formal letter of apology to Mermelstein on July 24, 1985, for the pain, anguish, and suffering he sustained relating to the $50,000 reward offer, and agreeing to pay him $90,000 to settle the case.

Judicial notice is when the Judge accepts some matter as fact beyond deliberation. For example, the Judge might say that December 1, 2009 was a Tuesday. Evidence code Section 452(h) reads:

452.  Judicial notice may be taken of the following matters to the extent that they are not embraced within Section 451:
...(h) Facts and propositions that are not reasonably subject to dispute and are capable of immediate and accurate determination by
resort to sources of reasonably indisputable accuracy.

From the notes of Fed. Rule Evid. 201 we see that:

"The California draftsmen, with a background of detailed statutory regulation of judicial notice, followed a somewhat similar pattern" [to] "Uniform Rule 9(1) and (2) which limit[ed] judicial notice of facts to those "so universally known that they cannot reasonably be the subject of dispute," those "so generally known or of such common notoriety within the territorial jurisdiction of the court that they cannot reasonably be the subject of dispute," and those "capable of immediate and accurate determination by resort to easily accessible sources of indisputable accuracy"..."and then has passed on into detailed treatment of such specific topics as facts relating to the personnel and records of the court...and other governmental facts..."

With respect to judicial notice of adjudicative facts, the tradition has been one of caution in requiring that the matter be beyond reasonable controversy. This tradition of circumspection appears to be soundly based, and no reason to depart from it is apparent. As Professor Davis says:

"The reason we use trial-type procedure, I think, is that we make the practical judgement,[sic] on the basis of experience, that taking evidence, subject to cross-examination and rebuttal, is the best way to resolve controversies involving disputes of adjudicative facts, that is, facts pertaining to the parties. The reason we require a determination on the record is that we think fair procedure in resolving disputes of adjudicative facts calls for giving each party a chance to meet in the appropriate fashion the facts that come to the tribunal's attention, and the appropriate fashion for meeting disputed adjudicative facts includes rebuttal evidence, cross-examination, usually confrontation, and argument (either written or oral or both). The key to a fair trial is opportunity to use the appropriate weapons (rebuttal evidence, cross-examination, and argument) to meet adverse materials that come to the tribunal's attention." ....
The rule proceeds upon the theory that these considerations call for dispensing with traditional methods of proof only in clear cases. Compare Professor Davis' conclusion that judicial notice should be a matter of convenience, subject to requirements of procedural fairness....

Judicial Notice was not appropriate in this case because this matter was the subject of a reasonable dispute. It was, in fact, the whole matter of dispute. By taking judicial notice, the judge took from the defendants any means of defending their side. I say the matter is one of reasonable dispute because, as the IHR website notes, in the affidavit Mermelstein presented to claim the $50,000 reward,

he described watching his mother and sisters enter "gas chamber no. 5" through a tunnel

and later, in sworn testimony,

he said he'd seen them going down the stairs into the tunnel to the gas chamber.

This was impossible

ecause even then it was well known to all students of Auschwitz that "gas chamber no. 5" -- in fact, Auschwitz Krematorium building V -- had no stairs descending from the outside, no tunnel, and no basement. It was entirely above ground!

The IHR/Mermelstein case proved nothing except that the courts are in control of the zionists.