Chris Bjerkness vs. Darryl

[Cheyene73]

I am wondering if anyone can help me on this battle. What is really going on?? I am a fan of Darryl and Ognir. I do enjoy Chris Bjerkness on things, but he does not write alot. This site  posted an article on his site that went after Chris Bejerkness. I had to say the article was full  of alot of innaccuracies. (viewtopic.php?f=4&t=9285).  I do believe Chris has it right on the Armenian massacre. But I also think it can only be understood fully in light of everything else we know. Needless to say this was a poor article. It was just a hit piece. I am not this huge backer of Chris at all but this article was lame. I think Chris has brought some real important issues to the table I think the Armenian massacre is one. I do believe he is stuck on it   though. In the end I wonder what the real issue of contention is. I say this because I have been an observer on this. I just am not sure what is going on. I do have to mention one thing in this article which made me chuckle. They dialed in on the Moon Landing and whether or not it was a hoax. Why?? Does it really matter at this point?? I tend to lean towards the hoax part. There is evidence that cannot be explained away. But in the end this is dragging it into the weeds. It is just not that critical in the scheme of things.

In summary, that article on Chris Bejerkness was a real cheesy hit piece. It had some good points, but it was childish. If this offends folks on this forum, I appologize. It has just bothered me and I had to say something. Like I said I am not some backer of Chris, I have tried to remain neutral on this one.

[Wimpy]

JoeBlow's re-print of Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs critique of Bjerkness was, of course, a an opinion piece filled with assertions.  Many of the assertions are introduced without supporting documentation (if any was available, that is) so readers should exercise due caution.

I am personally surprised that Bjerkness is "dedicated to protecting all Jews from the anti-Semitism and inhumanity of racist Jews", as stated on his http://www.jewishracism.com  site.  How much additional information is required to determine that Bjerkness has a personal point of view and that his goal is protecting fellow 'okay' jews from predatory jews and, apparently, from the likes of the horrible DBS :lol: .  His targeted audience is diminutive, based on the actual numbers of Jews out there and certainly doesn't include me; especially not being fan of Albert Einstein nor a jew.  I may visit the site for a more complete view and, who knows, I would probably learn something.

Cheyene73, seeing that you're relatively new here you might want to prepare for a tremendous onslaught of information from every conceivable angle.  You will notice that all information other than opinions and personal comments, are sourced, summarized and linked.  Posting such information does not necessarily mean the poster fully endorses it.  Also, be prepared to get ambushed should you ever decide to endorse an information source that isn't "pure play".  An example might be Alex Jones............... :roll:

[Ognir]

Welcome to the newcomer
CJB could always open up his comments
Why doesn't he?

He wrote some good stuff
yet I can piss him off in a second :lol:

I'll re-issue my request for a show (shite he might write an article on me)
However not so much as to cover he said she said

If he has new info and he wants to educate us, of course I'm up for it

However personally I think he works for Jewry, by his acts  8-)

[Cheyene73]

Well reading your r eplies has actually made me think more on this. Ognir you are right he has written some good stuff. But it is true he does not venture out much. I can say between you and Darryl you are all over the board on this stuff. Threading it from every angle. The other key thing you are doing is compartmentlizing on this stuff and not trying to instigate a complete hatred of the jew. Heck I know a few that I work with and they have no clue on this crap. None. But the key is when that Anti-semitism bell gets wrung they will march in order. Not all but a majority will.

Well, I myself am about discovering the truth, so I have to remain very fluid in my thinking and not become a zealot.

Good Day!!

Go Minnesota Vikings!!!!

[Mystic_Man]

It's kind of interesting how he writes the Jews the Jews constantly yet he himself is part Jewish as he's acknowledged. He was obsessing about Rafeeq supposedly being a Jew but he himself is a Jew. Whatever. We're in a real bad mess w/all this stuff if you really take a look at it. I mean these guys are the fringe of the fringe. AJ is tiny compared to the mainstream media.

[Ognir]

If memory serves me right, I did a show with probably Daryl on Nov 27th 2009 and on 28th Nov 2009 CJB started to cover what we had talked about in the show, or a small section, being B'o'C in Australia and he continues to write about BoC, strange character

Ego problem IMHO

[§N9sh2bj]

if he's not defining 'jew', then his claims don't mean very much.

Does he mean jew = criminal
or jew = askenazi
or jew = talmud-lovers, Torah (in this venue 'old testament', true translation not common christian version) second?
or jew = rothschilds, and he's just jealous he ain't gettin more?

until then, it's obfuscation. Here is a
1) Good jew (he claims to be jewish, no?), who is outing the 'Bad jews'.
Makow, Bjerkness, Jones, et al, vibe the above, as it seems defending the tribe - is of their paramount fictive b.s.. Making attempts to appear as though 'jew' = 'something other' than simply a code-word for criminal acts and so-forth, men possessed to destroy mankind - siding against it rather than in union with it (when have you ever heard one of these women or men say they have figured out what jew and gentile mean?) is a red-flag.

The difficulty for some is these quasi-jew players may occasionally out here-to-for unknown info. Are you men seriously going to waste your time criticizing or listening to these imbeciles any longer? Surely they must lack the critical I.Q. portion which, if normal or high, would require them to organize with their fellow man instead of against him - all men not just ashkenazi's.

[Free Truth]

Interesting angle there. Siding against it for an example...

would require them to organize with their fellow man instead of against him

Yeah, might I add though... I'm now thinking that anybody not saying lets unite, get a game plan and do what needs to be done is basically saying nothing.  

Bjerknes, why doesn't he just step up to the plate and do an interview with Ognir? Until then, fugedaboutit.