ZioDenniger on Zionist Chris Dodd-- but he forgets a little history

Started by CrackSmokeRepublican, February 25, 2010, 06:26:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

CrackSmokeRepublican

February 25, 2010, 06:26:35 PM
Quote"Why in the world should these homeowners pay that mortgage? After all, their debt was secured by the property, just like the commercial cases cited above. In most cases, they'd be fulfilling the terms of their contract by mailing in the keys and walking away from the house. In fact, by doing this, they'd save almost enough money to purchase the next house that sells in a foreclosure sale – perhaps even the one they're in!

    A word of caution: none of this is legal advice. Talk to a lawyer, accountant and financial advisor before considering this route. In some places (but not most), mortgage-holders are allowed to seize property above and beyond the real estate that secured the loan.

    The point I'm making here is that we only hear about "moral obligations to pay debts" when it's the consumer. Business walk away from bad deals all the time.

    I asked Senator Chris Dodd about this earlier this evening (I mistook JP Morgan for Morgan Stanley, please forgive the error). As Chairman of the Banking Committee, he was careful about what he said, but what he said was sensible: talk to counsel and determine what is best for you."

http://market-ticker.org/archives/2010- ... -Way!.html


ZioDenniger makes an example of Senator Chris Dodd, but ZioDenniger forgets why "Dodd" was appointed to this position of power --  the fact is, Chris Dodd's father,  was the lead prosecutor against the Nazis at Nuremberg. There is no other reason. His father prosecuted Jewish Enemies and took a big step in staging "evidence" to help create modern Israel.  The reward for their Jewish "Star" supporters was immense wealth and power in the Global Jewish Usury ripoff business.  

Dodd, Criminal Jew Puppet pure and simple -- ZioDenniger is fairly ignorant of how "things" work in Bankrupt Jew'merica. He sees the results but doesn't understand the scaffolding that erects these Talmudic Jew Ripoffs  that supports the Jew Idiot Holohoax Lies (like Human Soap and Shrunken Heads as Jew Evidence at Nuremberg)  :x  :

QuoteMonday, April 14, 2008
Dodd speaks at Holocaust Museum

In reinforcing the rule of law, the Nuremberg Trials established and highlighted the fact of the Holocaust, Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn. said Saturday evening at the Virginia Holocaust Museum.

Dodd is the son of Thomas J. Dodd, the late senator who is generally regarded as the most effective prosecutor at the trials. Christopher Dodd published last year "Letters from Nuremberg," which includes much of the daily correspondence that his father sent to his mother during the trials.

The senator was in Richmond to attend a policy retreat of Senate Democrats at the Jefferson Hotel. He signed copies of the book with the recently completed replica of the Nuremberg courtroom to his right. Senatorial colleagues Harry Reid of Nevada, Carl Levin or Michigan and Patrick Leahy of Vermont stopped by briefly for the festivities.

Dodd said his father believed that World War II "was about fundamental rights." If the defendants had not been accorded those rights, vengeance would have been all they produced, he said.

As the primary force behind the trials, the United States accumulated moral authority from them, Dodd said.

He said he believes that decisions of the Bush Administration – from condoning torture to its policies involving the terrorists at Guántanamo and weakening privacy rights through warrantless surveillance of telephone conversations and e-mail – have undermined that authority.

"You don't become stronger by giving up your rights," he said. "You become weaker as a people."

The Nuremberg Courtroom will be formally dedicated on May 1 in a ceremony that will include a speech by Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella of the Supreme Court of Canada.

Programs earlier in the day at a Rule of Law Conference at the museum will include appearances by Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, Virginia Chief Justice Leroy R. Hassell Sr. and Richmond Mayor L. Douglas Wilder.

http://vlweekly.blogspot.com/2008/04/do ... useum.html

--------
Dodd Center sculpture honors work of Holocaust survivor
By Sherry Fisher March 28, 1997

Two figures, arms touching, stare from behind barbed wire. Their faces are devoid of detail; their eyes are vacant and hollow. The images, hammered out of lead, are surrounded by broken pieces of wood.

Dana Baldwin Naumann created the sculpture "Holocaust: Never Forget ... Never Again," which he donated to the Thomas J. Dodd Research Center. The work is on permanent display in the building.

"The faces are faces that I remember very well," said Sigmund Strochlitz, a Holocaust survivor for whom the work is dedicated.

Naumann decided on the sculptures name after learning more about the Holocaust.

"The more I know about it, the more I am just amazed that human beings could do that to each other," he said. "It was a horrible inquisition. Some or all may forgive, but forgiveness is a very personal thing. But we must never ever let it happen again."

The artist, who lives in Branford, works mostly in metals. Naumann considers himself a Christian and many of his creations have spiritual titles, but he is not a member of any church, a profile in the New Haven Register noted.

Strochlitz, born in Poland in 1917, survived several concentration camps, including Auschwitz. His parents and sisters were killed.

Strochlitz, the organizer of many Holocaust observances, said the sculpture is "very meaningful."

"Dana is not looking for any rewards and yet he will be rewarded a thousand times, knowing that people from all walks of life will be moved by the sculpture, go back to study history to find out what happened in Germany in those dreadful years and why it happened," Strochlitz said.

"I would like to point out to you that strange as it may sound, the Jewish people in the ghettos and some concentration camps and especially in Teeresienstadt, turned to art ... to reassure our humanity, to fight back with the only weapon, the human spirit."

Strochlitz, a New London resident, is the owner of Whaling City Ford. Over the years, he has played a leading role in organizing official Holocaust observances in all 50 states. He received a mandate for this mission from the United States Holocaust Memorial Council to which he was appointed by former President Carter and reappointed by President Reagan.

In 1981, Strochlitz and his wife, Rose, also a Holocaust survivor, endowed the Strochlitz Chair and Institute in Holocaust Studies at Haifa University in Israel. In 1986, he was named the second recipient of the Elie Wiesel Remembrance Award. He is a member of the Board of Directors of the Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity.

"The work has been donated to the Dodd Center by Dana Baldwin Naumann in honor of Sigmund Strochlitz for all he has done to commemorate Holocaust survivors," said Linda Perrone, director of development for University libraries. "As a major benefactor and friend of the Dodd Center, it seemed most appropriate that the work be placed here."

http://advance.uconn.edu/1997/970328/03289712.htm

-----------


Senator Dodd: What My Father Saw at Nuremberg
October 1, 2006

Today, the Los Angeles Times published the following op-ed by Senator Dodd.  Senator Dodd is a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

SIXTY YEARS AGO today, at the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg, Germany, the verdicts were read in a trial that will forever define the punishment of war criminals. One by one, the 22 top surviving Nazi officers of Adolf Hitler were sentenced. By the time the gavel sounded, three had been acquitted, seven sent to prison and 12 condemned to death.

One of the people in court that day was my father, 38-year-old attorney Thomas Dodd, who was the No. 2 prosecutor for the United States behind Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson. My father always considered Nuremberg to be the most meaningful experience of his life.

My father wrote more than 400 letters to my mother from Nuremberg. Many are devoted to how much he missed his wife and children; others to the Nazis he had met.

But some of his harshest words were reserved for the Russians, who had little interest in a fair trial. In one letter, he tells the story of a toast offered by a visiting Soviet dignitary, who raised a glass and said: "May the road for these war criminals from the courthouse to the grave be a very short one."

"I winced," my father wrote, "and I could see that Judge [John J.] Parker, the American alternative, was certainly embarrassed."

But of course, a quick trial that led to quick executions was the temptation. The world had seen a monstrous regime try to conquer the world. It had seen them take the lives of more than tens of millions of men, women and children.

Why not just give in to vengeance? Why not just shoot them, as Winston Churchill wanted to do? Why not just succumb to the law of power politics and impose our will without any regard to principle? Why not just give in to violence, which was certainly within our ability and, many argued, within our right?

Why not? Because the United States has always stood for something more.

When we entered World War II, we did not fight for land or for treasure — we fought for an idea. The idea that laws should rule the land, not men; that the principles of justice embodied in our Declaration of Independence and Constitution — of due process, of innocence until proven guilty, of the right to a fair trial — do not get suspended for vengeance.

At Nuremberg, we rejected the certainty of execution for the uncertainty of a trial. The test was one of principle over power, and the United States passed.

President Harry Truman understood that our nation's ability to bring about a world of peace and justice was rooted not in our military might but in our moral authority; not on the ability to compel people with our tanks and planes but to convince them that our values and our ideals were right. He understood that our ability to succeed in spreading American values of freedom and human rights are only as effective as our willingness to uphold them.

Over the last six decades, that moral authority helped persuade more than half the nations of the world to embrace freedom and free markets. But now that they are walking with us, why are we walking away from them?

Today, we debate secret prisons, suspension of habeas corpus, warrant-less searches and wiretaps. The president even asks us to reinterpret the Geneva accords to sanction the torture of enemy prisoners.

Just as the word "Nuremberg" once defined the United States' moral authority and commitment to justice, what we risk today is that, one day, the loss of that moral authority and a commitment to injustice may also be defined by a single word: "Guantanamo."

Once again, the question is being asked: Why not just give in to vengeance and show our enemies less mercy than they showed their victims? Why not just abandon due process and the rule of law and the right to a fair trial?

Because the United States stands for something more.

Now, as then, this nation should never tailor its eternal principles to the conflict of the moment, because if we do, we will be walking in the footsteps of the enemies we despise. By abandoning the rule of law, as Congress did last week, we will lose much more than what we gain.

In the end, it's not about them — it's about us. It's about staying true to the values and principles that have always made our nation unique.

We would do well to remember the words of Justice Jackson: "We must never forget that the record on which we judge these defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow. To pass these defendants a poisoned chalice is to put it to our own lips as well."

http://dodd.senate.gov/?q=node/3648
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

CrackSmokeRepublican

#1
August 06, 2010, 11:58:14 PM
October 4, 2007
We must not ignore Nuremberg's lessons for today
 (Maybe because the Jew Scammers will get their asses kicked out of the USA in due time?   :)  )

By Sen. Christopher Dodd ( Jew Puppet on the Senate Banking Committee and AIG Jew Boy - like an Idiot Shabbos Goy, he still believes the Soviet-US propaganda known as the Holohoax by mentioning "dramatically" "Shrunken Heads"... a known lie... but he supports the US Jew'd Over Banking Establishment... a traitor in my book. )

Elie Wiesel (Jew Scam Artist) once wrote: "There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest." Let history show that at this moment, we are failing that test.

Half a century before the most terrible attacks our homeland has ever known, my father, Thomas Dodd, reluctantly left behind my mother, my four brothers and sisters and me to confront unspeakable horrors of another time. Thousands of miles away from Lebanon, Conn., in the "dead city" of Nuremberg, Germany, he would serve as executive trial counsel under Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, chief prosecutor at the trials of Nazi leaders.

Over the course of some 400 letters to my mother during those 15 months, my father wrote about the day-to-day happenings of the trial that included his horror of the death chambers and the banality of evil, as well as his pride in the establishment of America's moral authority at a pivotal time in history.

He wrote about the smell of 30,000 bodies trapped under the rubble and the magnitude of the slaughter of millions of Jews and others in concentration camps. My father painted a bleak picture of war-torn Europe: Polish forced laborers still living in tents many months after the conflict had ended, never to return home; the spiritual "scars" Paris bore, and the "shabby dress" and notable absence of makeup worn by women in post-war Britain.

From the trial itself there was the cross-examination of Nazi leaders. Though some remained defiant, my father described how many once powerful, swaggering figures had become "Bowery characters" -- small, broken men in the courtroom -- as prosecutors presented them with overwhelming evidence of their guilt, from signed ledgers documenting millions of murders to macabre ornaments, such as lampshades made by the Nazis of tattooed human skin and the shrunken head of a prisoner who had fraternized with a German woman.

Reading my father's letters, I could not help but imagine that the temptation to give in to vengeance must have been overwhelming. The very idea that justice would be served to the monsters who perpetrated such atrocities -- to the likes of "Nazi big boy" Hermann Goering or Wilhelm Keitel, the Third Reich military commander who issued the "Nacht und Nebel" decree that made it possible for the Nazis to rid themselves of opponents without the benefit of trial (the name refers to how opponents would vanish "into night and fog") -- turned many a stomach among the Allied powers.

But the import of what took place at Nuremberg stretched far beyond the borders of the European continent. It was also about the moral authority with which America would lead the world in uncertain times.

The test at Nuremberg was one of principle over power, and we showed the resolve to pass that test.

It wasn't easy, however. At the close of World War II, the Nuremberg trial was hardly the obvious option. At the time, Winston Churchill wanted to summarily execute the Nazi leaders. Stalin wanted show trials -- and then to shoot them.

But America's leaders understood something even Churchill did not: That what separated America from her enemies was how we led -- not by the example of our force but the force of our example.

Jackson deemed the decision to grant those who had committed the most terrible crimes against humanity in all of history a trial "one of the most significant tributes that power has ever paid to reason."

By marshaling wary allies to our side to respect the rule of law, America urged nations away from dictatorship and toward democracy at Nuremberg -- away from vengeance and toward justice. Armed with these principles, America would go on to help create international institutions that would serve the common good and security of all nations for 60 years: the United Nations, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the International Monetary Fund, among others.

But today, we see a U.S. administration oblivious to the lessons learned at Nuremberg and an America more vulnerable. The very abuses we rejected at Nuremberg we now see this president affirm in his prosecution of the war against terrorism, leaving America's reputation in the world today in tatters and its security in question.

This administration would have the American people believe we can either protect America or uphold the basic tenets upon which the country was founded.

Nuremberg established that the choice between moral authority and security is a false choice -- that it is our respect for the rule of law and justice that keeps America secure and our people safe.

Earlier this year, I introduced the Restoring the Constitution Act to reform the Military Commissions Act. If last century's most heinous criminals could receive due process, this century's most heinous criminals should, as well, if for no other reason than upholding the international credibility so critical to American security.

"If you are determined to execute a man in any case," Jackson said on the eve of the Nuremberg trials in April 1945, "there is no occasion for a trial. The world yields no respect to courts that are merely organized to convict."

And, I would add, no peace to those who organize them.  :lol:

http://www.jewishjournal.com/opinion/ar ... _20071005/

Sen. Christopher Dodd is the senior senator from Connecticut and a Democratic candidate for president. His book, "Letters From Nuremberg," a collection of his father's letters, was recently published by Crown Publishers.
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

Christopher Marlowe

#2
August 07, 2010, 04:12:07 AM
Holy crap. I can't stand to listen to them harp on about how noble and fair the Nuremberg trials were.

Those were show trials in the Stalinist tradition. The purpose was to parade the enemies of the Jews in public. To convict them on fake evidence and then execute them.

The Nuremberg trials used laws that were formulated by the Allies after WWII began. Essentially, the allies were using ex post facto laws.

Associate Justice William O. Douglas "charged that the Allies were guilty of "substituting power for principle" at Nuremberg.
Quote"I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled," he wrote. "Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time." http://www.associatedcontent.com/articl ... tml?cat=37
Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Harlan Fiske Stone called the Nuremberg trials a fraud.
Quote"(Chief US prosecutor) Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg," he wrote. "I don't mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas."
QuoteChurchill first advocated a policy of summary executions for some captured Nazis. At the Tehran Conference in 1943 Stalin "proposed executing 50,000-100,000 German staff officers," to which FDR sarcastically offered "perhaps 49,000 will do."

The initial positions of all three of these men led to the Nuremberg War Trials....f there is going to be any sort of "legal" machinations to the retribution shouldn't those legal events have some real solid precedence for their employment?....

The 1945-46 events that were the Nuremberg War Trials were not legal then or now. It was an effort to create legality where such did not previously exist.

Pompous d*ckhead examining Peruvian shrunken head. Thomas Dodd found some shrunken heads in a museum and decided to use them as an excuse to kill more Germans. Later, Thomas Dodd taught his son Christopher that gently licking the asses of Jews was the surest way to success.
And, as their wealth increaseth, so inclose
    Infinite riches in a little room

Negentropic

#3
August 07, 2010, 10:54:22 AM
http://www.sunray22b.net/war_trials.htm

War Trials

The Nuremberg War Trials are the most famous and, one hopes did not set the tone for subsequent trials. Perhaps they were less corrupt than Stalin's show trials but not much. They were designed to give an appearance of justice being done to top Nazis. It was pay back time. Bad law was  badly administered but then they were set up by Mickey Marcus, a Jew. It is certain that   Rudolf Höss, the commandant of Auschwitz testified having been tortured first by  Sergeant Clarke and other  Jews in the British Army [ see under ]. He was just one victim.

The Russian judge had to leave the trail when the Germans were being tried for invading Poland because the Russians were co-conspirators. All of the judges knew about this malpractice. The name for this is perverting the course of justice.
American War Crimes

They were major and that was just in Germany after the war. These were being committed as the Nuremberg trials were in full swing.
 
Nuremberg Trials

US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone called the Nuremberg trials a fraud. "[Chief US prosecutor] Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg," he wrote. "I don't mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretence that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas."

Associate Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas charged that the Allies were guilty of "substituting power for principle" at Nuremberg. "I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled," he wrote. "Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamour of the time."

Stone was to the point and being a very senior judge he knew what he was talking about.



 Nuremberg Trials

The validity of the court has been questioned for a variety of reasons:-
The main Soviet judge, Nikitchenko, had taken part in Stalin's show trials of 1936-1938,

One of the charges, brought against Keitel, Jodl, and Ribbentrop included conspiracy to commit aggression against Poland in 1939. The Secret Protocols of the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of August 23, 1939, proposed the partition of Poland between the Germans and the Soviets (which was subsequently executed in September 1939); however, Soviet leaders were not tried for being part of the same conspiracy. Instead, the Tribunal falsely proclaimed the Secret Protocols of the Non-Aggression Pact to be a forgery.

The court agreed to relieve the Soviet leadership from attending these trials as war criminals in order to hide their crimes against war civilians, crimes that were committed by their army that included "carving up Poland in 1939 and attacking Finland three months later." This "exclusion request" was initiated by the Russians and subsequently approved by the court's administration.

The Charter of the International Military Tribunal permitted the use of normally inadmissible "evidence."
Article 19 specified that "The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence... and shall admit any evidence which it deems to have probative value". Article 21 of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (IMT) Charter stipulated:

"The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United [Allied] Nations, including acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and the records and findings of military and other Tribunals of any of the United [Allied] Nations"

The chief Soviet prosecutor submitted false documentation in an attempt to indict defendants for the murder of thousands of Polish officers in the Katyn forest near Smolensk. However, the other Allied prosecutors refused to support the indictment and German lawyers promised to mount an embarrassing defence. No one was charged nor found guilty at Nuremberg for the Katyn Forrest massacre. In 1990, the Soviet government acknowledged that the Katyn massacre was carried out, not by the Germans, but by the Soviet secret police.

Article 21 has a meaning in plain English: We are going to claim whatever we want as the truth. They gave themselves a free rein to lie and pervert the course of justice.


Sergeant Clarke, Jew, Thug And Torturer

Clarke was a field police man after the war and searching for Nazis. He ran a party of men who captured Rudolf Höß, one time commandant of Auschwitz. They  found him on a farm near Heide in Schleswig Holstein. Clarke and the other Jews beat him and would have murdered him if they had not been dragged off. Then

It took three days to get a coherent statement out of him. But once he started talking there was no holding him.

Three days of torture presumably although the book does not quite say so. Höß signed a statement which was written in English, a language he did not understand. He gave evidence at Nuremberg as a result of torture and was subsequently hanged by the Poles. The Jew, Clarke however walks the streets of England, a successful business men and doubtless boasts over a pint about how he got away with GBH and various other crimes when he was subject to the King's Regulations, the Army Act and English law in general.

See page 232 et seq, Legions of Death by Rupert Butler
 
Nuremberg And Jews

"You know how I have despised anti-Semitism. You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge — you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish. Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial — for their own sake. For — mark this well — the charge 'a war for the Jews' is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and again. The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here will be cited as proof of this charge. Sometimes it seems that the Jews will never learn about these things. They seem intent on bringing new difficulties down on their own heads. I do not like to write about this matter —it is distasteful to me — but I am disturbed about it. They are pushing and crowding and competing with each other and with everyone else."

Chris Dodd tells me that when he reads this letter, "I first of all cringe a little bit because I wonder what he's driving at."
As provocative as the passages may seem, he suggests it's also important to note that his father specifically said he deplored anti-Semitism and, in fact, had close Jewish friends. So, the senator says, "I tried to understand it in the context, knowing who he was, knowing what he cared about, what his own history was. And there were those, the [Charles] Lindberghs and others, that made the case that...  Roosevelt got us into this war because of Jewish issues."

This quotation is from Thomas Dodd who was in the American Senate and at Nuremberg presumably in a legal capacity. He came unstuck later for fraud but not for being a drunkard.
 
Jews And Torture

Discrediting Torture is Jewish Self-Hate....
Think before you speak! Jews are the world's greatest advocates and practitioners of torture. If one discredits torture, one discredits traditional Jewish methodology. . .......
. . . one discredits The Holocaust™!


"Louis Marschalko, Special Correspondent; Playwright and Poet affirmed: "Out of 3,000 people employed on the staff at the Nuremberg Courts, 2,400 were Jews." . . .


http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Louis_Marschalko

"What methods were employed to extract confessions presented at a number of the war crimes trials of 1945 and later?
Torture, ranging from forcing the accused persons to eat faeces to destroying their reproductive organs in a most painful manner. All sorts of psychological tricks and duress were also employed. Some years before his death U.S. Senator Joseph R. McCarthy (1908-1957) gave the following statement to the press with regard to the war crimes trials: "I have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically tortured by methods which could only be conceived by sick brains. They subjected to mock trial and pretended executions, they were told their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval of the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the required confessions. "


Instead they should have handled it as if it needed no refutation. Jews have never once been guilty of crimes against the goyim. This is self-evident. Anti-Semitism exists outside the world of cause and effect. It is a disease that exists as spores in the soil. Once it infects a goy, you must beat it out of him. That is the only humane thing to do. The "light onto the world" is actually a blowtorch to the genitals.

A Jew writes about torture. He knows where the dirt is. Normal Jewish practice is to do evil and hide it. But some of them are honest.
 
Nuremberg and Other War Crimes Trials - Historical Fact No. 2
 
Richard Harwood makes a compelling case that the ingredients that made up the Nuremberg Trials were: the pretence of justice, restrictions on the defence, the presumption of guilt before the trial had even started, and hysterical accusations of the prosecution without any foundation of evidence.

In the indictment, there were very few crimes listed that the Allies themselves were not guilty of, and even fewer that the Germans were in fact guilty of.

This book contains, not a re-writing of history, but rather a simple guide to historical material which has been forgotten, or discounted. The 312,022 notarized defence affidavits presented at the trial have been forgotten, or discounted, while the 8 or 9 prosecution affidavits which "rebutted" them are remembered and canonized.

This book references a great many number of sources. That is so that interested but sceptical people may check things out for themselves.

Whether the statements of the defence are more credible than the charges of human soap, steamings, lampshades, gassings, and other wild accusations of the prosecution, is for the reader to decide.

The truth in politics is anything that cannot be proved to be a lie. There is no mention here  of torture. This does not mean that it was not part of the fun. Also Nuremberg and Other War Crimes by the same author.  
 
The Final Solution - The Attempt to Exterminate the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945
Seems to follow the official line on the Holocaust story.
 
The Nuremberg Trials from the American PBS

Dodd (archival): "This exhibit which is on the table is a human head with its skull bone removed, shrunken, stuffed and preserved. The Nazis had one of their many victims decapitated after having him hanged apparently for fraternizing with a German woman."
Narrator: The shrunken head had been used as a paperweight by the commandant of Buchenwald concentration camp. The courtroom was aghast.

This is a transcript from a PBS film. The shrunken head story seems to have been dropped.



 
WORLD WAR II ATROCITIES THAT THE CONTROLLED MEDIA WILL NOT TELL YOU ABOUT

"It is in a sense astonishing that 34 years after the war so little is known outside Germany about this unhappy sequel.  Even less has been discussed about the role that the United States and Great Britain played in authorising the expulsions."
- Alfred M. DeZayas, Nemesis at Potsdam

THE SOVIET-BRITISH HOLOCAUST

"Since the end of the war about 3,000,000 people, mostly women and children and over-aged men, have been killed in Eastern Germany and south-western Europe; about 15,000,000 people have been deported or had to flee from their homesteads and are on the road.  About 20% of these people, over 3,000,000 have perished. About 4,000,000 men and women have been deported to Eastern Europe as slaves... it seems that the elimination of the German population of Eastern Europe - at least 15,000,000 people - was planned in accordance with decisions made at Yalta.  Churchill had said to Mikolakczyk when the latter protested during the negotiations at Moscow against forcing Poland to incorporate eastern Germany: 'Don't mind the five or more million Germans.  Stalin will see to them.  You will have no trouble with them; they will cease to exist." Senator Homer Capehart. U.S Senate, Feb,5th, 1946
 

YES!  STALIN SAW TO THEM ALL RIGHT


The following is an excerpt from an eyewitness's account given by Leonora Geier (born, October,22nd,1925, Sao Paulo, Brazil) to Dr. Trutz Foelsche, Ph.D, the original account of which appeared in Deutsche Nationalzeitung, No.17-65, p.7.


"On the morning of February, 16th, (1945) a Russian detachment occupied the RAD (Reichsarbeitsdienst) camp Vilmsee near Neustettin.  The Commissar told me in good German language that the camp was dissolved and that we, as a unit with uniforms (RAD - German Labour Service, not military uniforms), would be transported to a collection camp.  Since I, as a Brazilian citizen, belong to an allied nation, he asked me to take over as a leader of the transport that went to Neustettin, into the yard of a former iron foundry.  We were about 500 girls (Maidens of the Reichsarbeitsdienst - German Labour Service).


He said I could come into the orderly room, which I accepted.  Immediately he directed me to make no further contact with the other women, because they were members of an illegal army.  On my response that this was not true, he cut me off with the remark that I would be shot immediately, if I would repeat in any form a similar statement.


"Suddenly I heard loud screams, and promptly, five girls were brought in by two Red Armists. The Commissar ordered them to undress.  When they, in a sense of shame, refused to d so, he ordered me to undress them and to follow him with the girls.  We walked through the yard to the former factory kitchen, which was completely cleared out except for some tables along the window wall.  It was dreadfully cold and the unfortunate girls trembled.  In the huge tiled room several Russians waited for us who were obviously making obscene remarks, because every word was followed by loud laughter.


The Commissar then directed me to watch how one makes sissies out of 'The Master Race'.


Now two Poles(1), clad in trousers only, entered the room.  At their sight the girls cried out.  Briskly, they seized the first of the two girls and bent her over with her back over the edge of the table until her joints cracked.  I almost fainted when one of the men pulled his knife and cut off her right breast in the presence of the other girls.  I have never heard a human being scream as desperately as this young woman.  After this 'operation' both men stabbed her several times in the abdomen, accompanied again by the howling of the Russians


The next girl cried for mercy, in vain; since she was exceptionally pretty.  I had the impression that the 'work' was carried out very slowly.  The other three girls were completely broken down, cried for their mothers and begged for a speedy death, but also fate them overtook.
The last of the girls was still half a child, with barely developed breasts; one tore the flesh literally from her ribs until the white bone appeared.


Again, five girls were brought in.  This time, they had selected carefully.  All were developed and pretty.  When they saw the bodies of their predecessors, they began to cry and scream.  Weak as they were, they tried to defend themselves but to no avail; the Poles became more cruel every time.  One of the girls, they cut open her womb and trunk over the full length; poured a can of machine oil into the mutilated body and tried to set fire to it.  Another was shot in the genitals by a Russia, before they cut off her breasts.


A great howling began when someone brought a saw from a tool box.  Now, using the saw, they set to work to tear the breasts of the girls to pieces, which in a short period of time led to the floor being flooded with blood. A blood rage seized the Russians.  Continuously one of them brought more and more girls.


Like in a red fog, I saw the gruesome happenings again and again and I perceived the inhuman screaming at the torture of their breasts and the loud groaning at the mutilation of their private parts.  When my legs failed me, I was forced into a chair.  The Commissar persistently watched me to make sure I was looking toward the torture scenes.  In fact, when I had to vomit, they even paused with their tortures.  One girl had not undressed completely, she may have been somewhat older than the rest of the girls who were about 17-years old.  One of the torturers soaked her bra with oil and ignited it and, while she cried out, another drove a thin iron rod into her vagina until it emerged at her navel


In the yard they liquidated entire groups of girls, after they had selected the prettiest ones for the torture room.  The air was filled with the death cries of many hundreds of girls.  But in view of what happened here, the slaughter outside could be considered more humane. It was a dreadful fact that not one of the girls brought into the torture room lost her consciousness.


In their horror all were equal in their expressions.  It was always the same; the begging for mercy, the high-pitched scream when their breasts were cut and their genitals mutilated.   Several times the slaughter was interrupted to sweep out the blood and to clear away the corpses.


That evening I sank into a severe nerve fever. From then on I lack any recollection until the moment I awoke in a military hospital.  German troops had recaptured Neustettin temporarily, and had thus liberated us.  As I learned later, approximately 2,000 girls were murdered during the first three days of the first round of Russian occupation."
Mrs. Leonora Geier, nee Cavoa
 
CHURCHILL AND STALIN'S HUMAN HARVEST

 "The disaster that befell this area with the entry of the Soviet forces has no parallel in modern European experience.  There were considerable sections of it where, to judge by all existing evidence, scarcely a man, woman or child of the indigenous population was left alive after the initial passage of the Soviet forces."
George F. Kennan, Memoirs, 1967, Vol.1, p265
 

"In fact, by eyewitness accounts, loot, pillage, pestilence and rape, wholesale murder and human suffering form one of the most terrible chapters in human history."

Senator Eastland, December, 4th, Congressional Record  "The official Czech register of names of villages reveals that nearly 500 (German) villages no longer appear on the register because they have literally disappeared from the landscape."

Munich Report, 1965 "Many Germans were hung up by their feet from the big advertising posters in St. Wenceslas Square, then when the great humanitarian approached their petrol-soaked bodies were set on fire to form living torches."

Louis Marschalko "Women and children were thrown from the bridge into the river.  Germans were shot down in the streets. It is estimated that 2,000 or 3,000 people were killed."  

F.A Voigt, Berlin correspondent, Manchester Guardian    "When the French colonial (Negro) troops under his (General Eisenhower) command entered the German city of Stuttgart, 'they herded German women into the subways and raped some 2,000 of them."  Even a PM reporter, 'reluctantly confirmed the story in its major details.' Peace Action, July, 1945
 

"WHAT KIND OF WAR DO CIVILIANS SUPPOSE WE FOUGHT ANYWAY?"


"We shot prisoners in cold blood, wiped out hospitals, lifeboats, killed or mistreated enemy civilians, finished off enemy wounded, tossed the dying into a hole with the dead, and in the Pacific boiled the flesh of enemy skulls to make table ornaments for sweethearts, or carved their bones into letter openers.  We topped off our saturation bombing and burning of enemy civilians by dropping atomic bombs on two nearly defenceless cities, thereby setting an all time record for instantaneous mass slaughter.


As victors we are privileged to try our defeated opponents for their crimes against humanity; but we should be realistic enough to appreciate that if we were on trial for breaking international laws, we should be found guilty on a dozen counts.  We fought a dishonourable war, because morality has a low priority in battle....
.... I have asked fighting men for instance, why they - or actual we - regulated flame-throwers in such a way that enemy soldiers were set afire, to die slowly and painfully, rather than be killed outright by a full blast of burning oil.  Was it because they hated the enemy so thoroughly?  The answer was invariably, 'No, we don't hate those poor bastards particularly; we just hate the whole goddam mess and have to take it out on somebody.


Possibly for the same reason we mutilated the bodies of the enemy dead, cutting off their ears and kicking out their gold teeth for souvenirs, and buried them with their testicles in their mouths, but such flagrant violations of all moral codes reach into still unexplored realms of battle psychology." Edgar L. Jones, U.S Second World War Veteran. Atlantic Monthly, February, 1946
 
"The newspapers are the dirtiest and filthiest things that ever happened." - Bjurstedt Mallory, Chicago Tribune, February 7th 1923
 
"Lies come first, and drag along the gullible.  Truth limps in long afterward on the arm of time." - Balthazar Gracian
 
"Political correctness is just another way of filtering the truth." -  Sir Peter Hall, Theatre Director.  
 


http://www.americannationalactionparty.com/a-AlliedAtrocities.htm














CrackSmokeRepublican

#4
August 07, 2010, 02:51:11 PM
QuoteThose researching and writing on the holocaust rarely mention the behind-the-scenes psychological warfare "black propaganda" work of three very interesting WWII era groups-The Bergson Group, The Ritchey Boys and Sefton Delmer's British PWE (Political Warfare Executive). The Bergson Group was was an Irgun cell run by Hillel Kook (aka Peter Bergson) that churned out anti-German atrocity stories from offices in Washington DC which were planted in periodicals like The Reader's Digest. The Riitchey Boys were for the most part refugee German speaking Jewish psyops soldiers trained at Fort Ritchie, Maryland and sent back into occupied Europe at the end of the war as court clerks, investigators, interrogators, patent looters, and disinformation agents. Wikipedia says there 10,000 Ritchie Boys, but try finding any follow-up on just of ten of them. Finally, the Political Warfare Executive was claimed by David Irving to be the source of the Auschwitz gassing story before he changed his tune. Specifically, Irving used to insist it was a bit of disinfo put into circulation by the PWE and the Polish Government in Exile officially recognized as black propaganda by a Mr. Cavendish-Bentinck in an exchange of telegrams here: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/Cav ... tinck.html
For a video crash course in OSS/Signal Corps psyops in relation to what has become the received history of holocaust a visit to http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/ is recommended.


QuoteThe "Bergson Boys" and "The Ritchey Boys"..Let's hear more about them from revisionists. This is fertile overlooked territory.

During the war Hollywood screen writer Ben Hecht and Irgun operative Hillel Kook (aka Peter Bergson) cook up grisly holocaust propaganda for American mass consumption in magazines like the Reader's Digest. Using Freudian based mind control techniques, first put into play by Edward "The Father of Spin" Bernays, the "Bergson Boys" inoculate the English speaking world with the sacred 6,000,000 number before the war ends and the camps are liberated. Bernays is the wildly successful nephew of Sigmund Freud and the man who introduced and promoted Freud in the USA. Like Bernard Baruch, he is a "king maker" and personal friend of presidents Wilson, Hoover and Roosevelt with whom he's consulted and globe trotted. Joseph Goebbles acknowledges his debt to Bernays in his diaries.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 3825999151

"The Bergson Boys" was a Zionist cell working out of Washington DC with access to inner circles of media power and politics. "Having energized politicians, gangsters, Hollywood moguls, and ultra- Orthodox rabbis, the handful of young men taught other Zionist and American- Jewish groups not only how the media was the message but how it could and should be used. A guiding force behind the creation of the War Refugee Board, the group served as a beacon for contemporary Zionist militancy while ultimately laying the groundwork for other organizations to utilize the media in future political campaigns":

http://www.syracuseuniversitypress.syr. ... -boys.html

During and after the war master Soviet propagandist Ilya Ehrenberg and the Anti-Fascist League (Soviet Jewish writers later executed after show trials), crunch the numbers of Jewish losses and population transfers and gin up the general extent of depredations against Jews in East Europe. Commissars and partisans (a disproportionate number of which were Jewish) had been severely dealt with on the Eastern Front by the defeated and collectively demonized Germans. Their treatment was harsh, but Ehrenberg and co. insure that history will make it appear even harsher.

http://www.rense.com/general75/ehr.htm

Immediately after VE Day (but also throughout the war) "The Ritchie Boys," (up to 10,000 German speaking refugees trained in interrogation and psy ops at Fort Ritchie Maryland) are sent into Allied occupied Europe to interrogate high ranking Nazi POWs and spread disinformation. This is a chapter in US army intelligence history that remains curiously obscure. Less than a dozen out of all the Ritchey Boys have been identified. They have been put forward as avuncular reluctant heroes not spies and torturers. All the ones we know of are Jews: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritchie_Boys

In l944 Raphael Lemkin, overseeing a team collating data on German atrocities for the WJC (World Jewish Congress) and The Carnegie Foundation in New York almost inadvertently comes up with the concept of 'genocide," a word he invents and introduces in his book AXIS RULE IN OCCUPIED EUROPE. The book is not about genocide per se, and Lemkin doesn't quite realize what he's stumbled onto until...

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v05/v05p388_Martin.html

Lt. Col Murray C. Bernays (the brother-in-law of Edward L. Bernays) latches onto Lemkin's new word "genocide" and tailors the Nuremburg Trial around the idea of collective Nazi guilt and "crimes against humanity." The latter is the Lemkin based forerunner to the UN Genocide Conventions, which will come later. Genocide isn't the issue at Nuremburg, but "crimes against humanity" is the legal gambit Bernays uses to hold all Nazis collectively responsible for starting WWII. Using this corkscrew logic, eventually three generations of Germans are held responsible for the holocaust. Americans and ultimately all Christendom starting with Pope Pius XII get blamed, too, and Jews born after l945 in Brooklyn morph into "second generation survivors."

http://www.mtsu.edu/~baustin/trials1.html

In his 1958 book THE WORLD CONQUERORS refugee Hungarian playwright, poet and journalist Louis Marschalko, who covered the Nuremburg Trial, writes:

Quote"Of the 3000 persons on the trial staff, 2400 were Jews. Many of them wore uniforms to which they had no entitlement."

Marschalko, a nationalist, surveyed the worldwide advance of Communism from a decidedly Catholic perspective. The author's argument is that Communism is a worldwide movement, promoted everywhere by the same transnational force. http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Louis_Marschalko

Redeemed New Zealand academic Prof. Joel Hayward disagrees-

"On page 44 I described Louis Marschalko's claims that Jews fabricated their Holocaust suffering as "unscholarly ... weak, racist arguments". Two pages later I described them as "nonsense". A further two pages later I called the same views "too polemical and biased against Jews". On page 54 I bluntly wrote that, to state that Jewish frauds "have occurred on a 'horrendous scale' [as one particularly nasty writer said] and as the result of a Jewish conspiracy to defraud the German government, is preposterous and totally insupportable." On the same page I criticized that author's "biases and prejudices", while on the next page I condemned his claims of a Jewish conspiracy as "totally unsustainable"."

http://www.joelhayward.com/drhaywardssubmissioni.htm

In Sept. 2008 US presidential candidate Christopher Dodd publishes his father Thomas Dodd's letters home to his wife from Nuremburg where he was a star prosecutor. There were too many Jews there, he concurred, "Jews should stay away from this trial – for their own sake," Dodd explains. He doesn't want them to supply anti-Semites and isolationists with ammunition – afraid of a possible growing sentiment to describe the war as a"war for the Jews."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/rosn ... rc=Y&art=1 orhttp://tinyurl.com/4vfpbq

Senator Chris Dodd doesn't have the decency to admit that his grandstanding dad presented false evidence at Nuremburg so he lets the legend of the phony Polish shrunken heads found at Buchenwald (quite possibly supplied by one or more " Ritchie Boys") stand:

http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/n ... nkenheads/

Then there's the Polish Government-in-exile and The British Political Warfare Executive. William C. Paley (later head of CBS) and C.D. Jackson (later editor–in-chief of LIFE) are secret agents in Bruce Lockhart's small and very exclusive branch of the PWE. Jan Karski, Rudolph Vrba, Sefton Delmer and Victor Cavendish-Bentinck etc. work together in another branch. Those who believed Tony Blair when he told them he had it from his spymasters that missiles launched from Baghdad could reach London in 45 minutes will enjoy this:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 530349.ece

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... =firefox-a

Keep in mind that Philby was a documented Rothschild Agent. --CSR

QuoteMaster Scams described here:

by Crack_Smoke_Republican on 31.07.2008 [03:55 ]

The crime of the "holocaust" was a counter-intelligence operation to bolster Israel.
www. onethirdoftheholocaust.com/nazishrunkenheads/ —

During WWII there weren't a lot of American servicemen stationed in Brazilian port cities, what with Brazil not greatly figuring into WWII. But strangely Albert G. Rosenberg was stationed in the Brazilian port city of Natal, Brazil. Rosenberg told me he'd seen plastic shrunken heads as well as real shrunken heads in the stores there. Whether ideas he or his felllow servicemen got in Brazil has anything to do with his stumbling upon two shrunken heads at Buchenwald in Germany, is open to conjecture. — (Jew Lies and Propaganda).
(
ANGLETON WAS NEVER FOOLED AT ALL with PHILBY or BEN GURION — HE PLAYED THE DUPE TO FURTHER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ZIONIST ISRAEL. THE JEWS ON ALL SIDES WERE WORKING TOGETHER TO MIS-INFORM THEIR RESIDENT GOVERNMENTS TO FURTHER THE CREATION OF THE JEWISH STATE IN 1947. ANGLETON MUST HAVE KNOWN THE END GAME in WII- WAS ENTIRELY FOR THE CREATION ISRAEL. KENNEDY THREATENED HIS WORK.
)

After World War II ended, and the dimensions of the Nazi Holocaust became clear, it was politically impossible for men like these to constrict immigration of the survivors to Palestine, and ultimately impossible for them to stop the formation of the state of Israel. They tried, as did their successors, but in a delicious irony, some of the very left-wing Jews they detested discovered these perfidious schemes with the help of the USSR's own intelligence agencies (Remember, the Soviets were the first to get to Berlin and they seized many Nazi intelligence documents, as well as many Nazi spies themselves). Also, Soviet intelligence had long used "fascist Jews" to penetrate the inner circles of the Third Reich and assist the USSR in its struggles on the Eastern Front. Many of these Jews were communist double agents, but others defected to Zionism after the war, and told Israeli founding fathers like David Ben-Gurion of secret deals between the British and the Americans, and the Nazis. The Zionists blackmailed Dulles's successor in Europe, James Jesus Angleton, to allow Jews to be smuggled into Palestine, and blackmailed the USSR (by threatening to disclose Soviet penetration of the CIA and MI6) so that anti-Semite Joseph Stalin actually supported the partition of Israel. That the nation-building Zionists played just as dirty as the communists and capitalists, the authors assert, is the reason that Israeli historians did not welcome the book's disclosures any more than the other duplicitous parties.

In the first days of Israeli statehood, survival was not assured. Arms from communist Czechoslovakia helped them win their first war with the surrounding Arabs. But the early Israeli leaders knew that they could not depend upon the USSR for continued support, so Ben-Gurion politically isolated the communists from his government and warned Angleton, now USA's intelligence officer for Israel, that Kim Philby (disgusted by his father's anti-British, pro-Nazi leanings, so much so that he himself became a traitor to the UK and a secret convert to communism, even as he rose in the ranks of British intelligence) was a Soviet mole inside MI-6. Angleton buried these warnings, because subsequent investigation of such charges would have revealed Angleton's and Dulles's financial collaborations with the Nazis.

During the Eisenhower era, John Foster Dulles became Secretary of State and brother Allen was appointed director of the CIA. Vice-President Richard Nixon encouraged the immigration to America of European ethnics, Eastern European ex-fascists, who were intended to counterbalance the consistently Democratic-voting American Jews. Allen Dulles betrayed both Britain and Israel in his push to secure American access to Saudi oil deposits through companies like Aramco. In fact, a revolving door between the intelligence community and the oil companies that allowed ex-spooks to become oil executives, dictated American Middle East policy, and contributed to Nixon's razor-thin loss to JFK in 1960. In 1967, while outwardly supporting Israel in its Six Day War against the united Arab armies, both the USA and the UK shared Israeli defense plans with Arab oil producers. This is why the Israelis knocked out the American surveillance ship the USS Liberty, though at the time all sides agreed it was an accident.

Similarly, the official history of the Yom Kippur War of 1973 credits the intervention of an American Jew, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, with saving Israel by warning off the USSR and airlifting arms to Israel. Loftus and Aarons provide a different take on this. In their view (or that of many intelligence officers whom they interviewed), Kissinger was a military incompetent and created a climate for war by sabotaging the Sadat/Rogers peace negotiations because he could not claim credit for these. Kissinger dithered with intelligence, mobilization, and re-supply, and Israel would have been in serious danger without the intervention of White House chief-of-staff (and ex-military man) Alexander Haig. Kissinger scapegoated CIA counterintelligence chief James Jesus Angleton for these blunders, forcing Angleton's retirement.

www. john-loftus.com/bookreview.asp

viewtopic.php?p=9166&sid=9a2f9e569f3058336981bf6cc47242a1#p8506
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

Negentropic

#5
August 12, 2010, 02:41:43 PM
Generally Very Good (with some of the usual conspiracy show minor faults) Guiliani / Truth Hertz show today on the Nuremberg Trials:
 
Thursday, August 12, 2010  16kbps On Demand M3U / Mobile Torrent  
  The rigged Nuremberg Trials.

http://www.oraclebroadcasting.com/archives.php?who=Truth_Hertz

CrackSmokeRepublican

#6
February 25, 2011, 10:48:05 PM
Work at AIG

In 1987, AIG hired Cassano as one of the first ten people in the Financial Products unit, as Chief Financial Officer.[5] In 1994, Thomas R. Savage appointed Cassano as head of the Transaction Development Group. Cassano accepted the 1998 proposal by J.P. Morgan to package credit-default swaps on Broad Index Secured Trust Offering (nicknamed Bistros). Cassano considered these collateralized debt obligations a key event: "It was a watershed event in 1998 when J.P. Morgan came to us, who were somebody we worked with a great deal, and asked us to participate."[6]

Subprime mortgage crisis

Cassano sold hundreds of billions of credit protection in the form of CDOs without having to put up any real money as collateral as this form of insurance had been deregulated with the Phil Gramm-sponsored Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000.[7] When, in the financial crisis of 2008, investment banks requested insurance money for their collapsing derivatives, AIG was unable to deliver and received a bail-out from the tax payers.

During his career at AIGFP from 1987 until he was forced to retire in March 2008, Cassano received $315 million: $280 million in cash and an additional $34 million in bonuses.[8] An initial $1 million-a-month consulting fee was later canceled.[9] According to Matt Taibbi:

    In fact, Cassano remained on the payroll and kept collecting his monthly million through the end of September 2008, even after taxpayers had been forced to hand AIG $85 billion to patch up his mistakes. When asked in October why the company still retained Cassano at his $1 million-a-month rate despite his role in the probable downfall of Western civilization, CEO Martin Sullivan told Congress with a straight face that AIG wanted to "retain the 20-year knowledge that Mr. Cassano had." (Cassano, who is apparently hiding out in his lavish town house near Harrods in London, could not be reached for comment.)[10]

In the wake of the scandal, United States regulators and the United Kingdom Serious Fraud Office began investigating Cassano's dealings to determine whether they were just excessive and risky, or criminal.[11]

Political contributions

Cassano was a political contributor to the campaigns of Chris Dodd, Barack Obama and the Republican Representative Nancy L. Johnson [12]

In March 2009 Cassano was linked to e-mails he authored in 2006 which solicited contributions from AIG executives for Dodd's campaign due to Dodd's position as incoming chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.[13]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Cassano
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/st ... over/print
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

CrackSmokeRepublican

#7
April 04, 2011, 10:21:07 PM
This Jew puppet has a few Shabbos Goy String "tics" left in his pasty corrupted Jew Talmudic Piehole ...  :x  -- CSR

------------



Sen. Chris Dodd took millions from now-failing finance firms he oversees

September 29, 2008 |  7:06 pm

Maybe some of you remember Chris Dodd, the white-haired Democratic senator from Connecticut who actually moved his family to Iowa to win his party's presidential caucus last winter.

But didn't.

So Dodd returned to the U.S. Senate as chairman of the powerful Banking Committee, where he'd promised to protect "the safety and soundness of our financial institutions."

Democratic Connecticut Senator and former presidential candidate Chris Dodd who's received millions in donations from troubled financial firms he was to be overseeing according to a Hartford Courant investigation endorsing Illinois Senator Barack Obama who's vowed to reform such lobbying practices

Well, as we've all seen in recent days with chaos in the financial markets -- collapsed firms, collapsed deals to protect financial firms -- that Dodd promise turned out real well.

Turns out, according to our esteemed corporate colleagues over at the Hartford Courant, meanwhile, things have turned out real swell financially for Dodd himself.

In an investigative story by Matthew Kaufman and Jesse A. Hamilton, the newspaper reveals that although Dodd was a presidential also-ran in terms of votes, in terms of cash money he ranks among the top five receivers of donations from the nation's now-troubled financial sector.

"During the past 20 years," the Courant reports, "PACs and employees of finance-related firms have contributed more than $13 million to Dodd's election efforts, including nearly $6 million in the past two years."

That's $250,000 per month from people who expect legislative protection. That kinda money oughta cover the electric bills, anyway.

Additionally, Portfolio.com reported in June that Dodd was among a select group of public officials who quietly received preferential loans that waived points, fees and company rules at Countrywide Financial.

Dodd's party has controlled both houses of Congress for the last two years. And although Dodd elbows his way to the front of any photos of congressional Democrats allegedly trying to solve the current crisis, the five-term senator is facing mounting criticism that he and others did way too little, too late to prevent this money meltdown.

As one representative of Common Cause diagnosed the situation for the newspaper, "We have a system where the special interests that give the most money tend to get policies out of Congress that are beneficial to them."

Doesn't that sound familiar? Wait, that's one of the major political planks of another senator, Barack Obama, the Iowa caucus victor, and his vice presidential running mate, six-term senator Joe Biden, both of whom Dodd has now endorsed.

The Courant has the rest of this fact-filled, revealing article here.

--Andrew Malcolm


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washing ... -dodd.html


===========

Former Sen. Chris Dodd Named MPAA Chief

    By David Kravets Email Author
    March 1, 2011  |
    3:02 pm  |
    Categories: intellectual property, privacy

Christopher Dodd, the former five-term Democratic senator from Connecticut, was named Tuesday to head the Motion Picture Association of America.

Dodd, who just retired after declining to run for a sixth Senate term, replaces Bob Pisano, the lobbying group's interim chief since April. Pisano has been warming the chair of the retiring Dan Glickman, also a former senator as well as U.S. agriculture secretary.

Dodd said piracy would be a chief concern.

"Protecting this great American export will be my highest priority," he said in a statement.

He sat on the Foreign Relations Committee, headed the Banking Committee, and co-authored the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Among other things, he attempted to filibuster the legislation that immunized telecom companies from lawsuits over the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping program.

As head of the MPAA, he's likely to be a little less friendly to the average netizen. The MPAA has lobbied hard for the controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.

It has pushed for the government to shutter websites suspected of hosting infringing material, and is responsible for using the American legal system to sue U.S.-based torrent search engines out of existence. A case against Canadian-based Isohunt is pending.

MPAA is also responsible for blocking distribution of RealNetworks' DVD-copying software.

Photo: AP

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/03/dodd-mpaa/
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

CrackSmokeRepublican

#8
November 27, 2012, 03:04:36 AM
Polish Intelligence operative Karski described below that ran as a courier for Communist-Socialist Jew Leaders in Warsaw.  He was mentioned as part of the British Intelligence as well in the OneThirdoftheHolocaust article at top. --CSR  
-------


QuoteJan Karksi

Jan Karski was the non de plume of Jan Kozielewski, the youngest of eight children, born in a tenement house at 71 Kilinskiego Street on the 24 April 1914.

Following secondary school he went to Lvov in 1931 to study there. He was awarded with a Doctor of Law and Diplomacy title, and he later worked in the diplomatic corps, in pre-war Poland and secured coveted oversees postings in London and Paris.

Just prior to the Nazi invasion of Poland Jan Kozielewski enlisted in the army and served as a cavalry officer, when first the Germans then the Soviets invaded Poland in September 1939. He was captured by the Soviet forces and incarcerated in a detention camp.  Jan Kozielewski escaped from the camp and joined the Polish underground, whilst most of his fellow captives were later executed by the Soviets.

Now Jan Karski, he became a skilled courier for the underground, working with the Allied forces in the West. Whilst employed on underground work he was arrested by the Gestapo in Preshov Slovakia in 1940, and he was brutally tortured.

Fearing that he might reveal secrets and betray his underground colleagues, he slashed his own wrists, and was put into a hospital, from where he was able to escape, with the help of the Underground.

In the third week of August 1942, in the midst of the Nazi mass deportation of the Jews of Warsaw to the Treblinka death camp, Jan Karski entered the Warsaw Ghetto, and met two Jewish leaders, Leon Feiner and Adolf Berman, (Communist Jews likely taking cues from Soviet Russia propagandists) this visit is reproduced in full- see Jan Karski inside the Warsaw Ghetto.

Photograph depicting segregated public transport for Warsaw Jews, Warsaw - from the Jan Karski papers, envelope D

They both urged Jan Karski to inform the Allied leaders about the mass extermination of Polish Jewry. They both  :^)  urged Karski to take to the Allies the following  :^)  (Commie-Allied Propaganda War) proposal:

Quote    Preventing the extermination of the Jews should be declared an official goal of the Allies.
    Allied propaganda should be used to inform the German people of the war crimes taking place and to publicise the names of the officials taking part.
    The Allies should appeal to the German people to bring pressure on Hitler's regime to stop the slaughter.
    The Allies should declare that if the genocide continued and the German masses did nothing to stop it, the German people would be held collectively responsible.
    Finally if nothing else worked, the Allies should carry out reprisals by bombing German cultural sites and executing Germans in Allied hands who still professed loyalty to Hitler.

<$>

Jan Karski knew that the proposals were bitter and unrealistic and beyond international law , and told them so, but sought advice from the two Jewish Bund leaders as to what he should say to Jewish leaders who lived abroad.

Leon Feiner invited Karski to go on another fact finding mission to witness at first hand how the Nazis were rounding up Jews for extermination. A few days after this meeting Karski and a member of the Jewish underground left Warsaw for Izbica.

Izbica was a transit ghetto where some Jews from the town itself, plus the adjacent communities as well as Jews from Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia were sent, prior to their final journey to the Belzec and Sobibor death camps.
Szmul_Zygielbojm

The account of Karski's visit to Izbica, where he saw with his own eyes, the terrible conditions the Jews experienced, is reproduced separately – see Jan Karski – Visit to Izbica.

Returning to Warsaw, Jan Karski was given a microfilm of hundreds of documents and he made his way by train to Berlin, onto Vichy France, then crossed into Spain, reaching London, via Gibraltar. (this sounds via "intelligence" suspicious--CSR)

In February 1943 Jan Karski met with the British Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden, later he recalled what Anthony Eden said, "That Great Britain had already done enough by accepting 100,000 refugees."

In London he also met with Szmuel Zygelboym who represented the Jewish Socialist Bund in the National Council of the Polish government in exile, to inform him of what he had witnessed and to inform him of the desperate need for urgent action and what the Jewish leaders in the Warsaw ghetto had told him.

Jan Karski (standing) in Washington DC 1944

Szmuel Zygelboym said he would do all he could to help them but a few months later on the 12 May 1943, just after the Germans crushed the Jewish resistance in the Warsaw ghetto, he committed suicide.

In July 1943 Jan Karski travelled to the United States of America, where he met President Roosevelt. Whilst Jan Karski felt he failed to convince Roosevelt of the plight of the Jews, but it was not so, Roosevelt changed American policy by establishing the War Refugee Board, to help settle surviving Jews in America.

Jan Karski wanted to return to Poland to continue his work for the underground but he was ordered to remain in the USA, as the Germans now knew his identity. During his time in America he gave interviews and wrote articles, he wrote a book "Story of a Secret State," which was published at the end of 1944.

http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org ... arski.html


---------

QuoteA Jewish socialist party, called the Bund, and Polish socialist parties had maintained their links; the Jewish Communists kept contact with their counterparts on the Polish side; the other parties, ranging from the Zionist right and left and assorted centre and right, established contact through their various professional prewar associations. Youth groups, notably the Scouts, were another very important link.

In 1942, Dr. Adolf Berman, code-named "Borowski," was a member of a left-wing Zionist party and a director of CENTOS, a Jewish charitable organization dedicated to the care of children in the ghetto. After the formation of the Jewish National Committee that united six Zionist parties, it was decided that Berman should get out of the ghetto and concentrate on establishing Polish contacts to help Jews escape from the ghetto, and then survive on the Aryan side.

At the same time, Leon Feiner – code named "Mikolaj" – a lawyer and a leading member of the largest Jewish political party, the Bund, left the ghetto with the same objectives as those of Berman. Through his long association with Polish socialists, Feiner made contact not only with the AK, but with members of the Underground in the Delegatura, representing in Poland the Government-in-Exile. Feiner, who looked very much like a typical "Polish country squire" and armed with excellent forgeries bearing a Polish Catholic identity, was able to move around Warsaw with relative ease.

..........

The Bund, represented by Leon Feiner had long-standing contacts with Polish socialists, and Adolf Berman had extensive professional contacts – he was a noted psychologist – with Poles and with ghetto welfare workers in CENTOS. According to Berman, "The Jewish National Committee (a coalition of Zionist parties) had more than 100 cells involved in the relief and rescue of Jews, the majority of which were made up of Poles. Moreover... (in) the Bund ...the active workers were members of the Bund and Poles ...first and foremost Polish Socialists.34


<$>

http://www.projectinposterum.org/docs/zegota.htm
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

CrackSmokeRepublican

#9
November 27, 2012, 03:11:55 AM
Protest and Prayer: Rabbi Dr Solomon Schonfeld and Orthodox Jewish Responses (Book)
 By Chanan Tomlin

page 90:

QuoteThe declaration of 17 December prompted the Political Warfare Executive to issue a directive for the week beginning 24 December 1942, the significance of which was that the persecution of the Jews was to become a central theme in British war propaganda. It stated:

The sufferings of the Jews should now be merged in the wider picture of Nazi persecutions [...] We should bear in mind (i) the Jewish persecution has in all countries been the prelude to the persecution of other sections of the population; (ii) that apart from its physical brutality, it is a subtle form of political warfare aimed at breaking human ties between different individuals in all countries and destroying any feeling of common citizenship where persecution of the Jews is set on foot.

The directive was pre-empted by the directive for the week beginning 10 December that ordered that all leaflets and wireless broadcasts to occupied Europe 'should coldly and factually establish Hitler's plan to exterminate the Jews in Europe'. This directive continued, 'Anti-Semitism was a potent weapon of political warfare. The time has now come to use it against them'.

QuoteOn page 91 the mention that on Sept. 12, 1943, Washington, DC informed the British Jewish Board of Deputies that already 4,000,000 Jews had been "exterminated" in Europe.
(DAMN THAT IS A LOT OF BODIES TO DISPOSE OF IN SUCH A SHORT TIME WHEN many OF THE "EXTERMINATION CAMPS" weren't even fully up and "running".  -- Seems like both Brit-American-Soviet-Polish-Jews generally believed each others' lies about how many people were getting killed. They believed their own largely fictional numbers.  The Holohoax was an "intelligence operation of Political Warfare" and it still is today...--CSR)

http://books.google.com/books?id=X7vTd-VyyPEC&pg=PA90




QuoteBritish Wartime Propaganda Lies

During the Second World War, Britain's main "dirty tricks" propaganda agency was the Political Warfare Executive (PWE), a unit of the British Foreign Office. This psychological warfare agency invented and distributed "black" propaganda disinformation to boost morale among anti-German British and Americans, and to promote anti-German sentiment in neutral countries. Its work also included manufacturing and distributing bogus German documents.

Some of the PWE's most bizarre falsehoods were distributed on phonograph records as part of a secret "Special (Venom)" campaign directed to Arabs. These fables included reports that Hitler hated Arabs, and that a Jewish doctor had cut off the German leader's testicles. Epithets applied to Hitler in this report included including "pig," "swine" and "bastard." Such exotic propaganda was considered necessary, the PWE advised, because Hitler's prestige was "tremendous in Arab countries."  <:^0

The Arab-oriented campaign also included stories suggesting that the Germans were using mosques as brothels in Axis-ruled Tripoli. According to another PWE story, "Germans [were] so short of cloth they are training agents to disinter bodies in Muslim cemeteries and seize shrouds for use as machine rugs in Germany."

One of the most malicious PWE "black" reports was this April 1943 story: "On entering Tunis Allied troops found dead children cut up as butchers' meat in the German army store. Portions of them had already been used as pork ration. Typically enough, the Germans had filed their identity cards."

Some British officials were skeptical of this campaign's effectiveness. For example, a PWE story that Goebbels had enriched himself during the war, and had hidden away a private fortune, said one official, "would evoke admiration and envy rather than disapprobation."

This "Special (Venom)" campaign was first made public in 1994 when the relevant files were declassified from Britain's Public Records Office (and then reported in The Guardian newspaper, London, September 8, 1994, p. 22).

During the war years, British agencies produced and disseminated a wide range of anti-German propaganda lies. According to one suggested story, the Germans were using poison gas to secretly kill off their own wounded soldiers. This manufactured "rumor," designed to mislead and demoralize the German public, was proposed by Britain's Joint Intelligence Sub-Committee in October 1941. (A facsimile of the secret wartime document confirming this is published in facsimile in the Sept.-Oct. 1993 Journal, p. 43.)

Even some of the more bizarre propaganda stories have proven remarkably durable over the years. A good example is the wartime fable that the Germans were manufacturing oil and soap from the bodies of murdered Jews, a report that became an important feature of Jewish and Allied war propaganda. Two major Jewish agencies, the World Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Congress, energetically promoted this lie. (See: M. Weber, "Jewish Soap," Summer 1991 Journal, pp. 218, 234.)

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n5p15_propaganda.html
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

FrankDialogue

#10
November 29, 2012, 12:00:24 PM
CSR, another outstanding historical post...I would join in, especially on issues like Poland in WWII, as I am of Polish & Slovak descent... I simply do not have the time presently, but I am reading these posts.

CrackSmokeRepublican

#11
November 29, 2012, 09:27:26 PM
Quote from: "FrankDialogue"CSR, another outstanding historical post...I would join in, especially on issues like Poland in WWII, as I am of Polish & Slovak descent... I simply do not have the time presently, but I am reading these posts.

Thanks Frank... I found this a few months ago which bears upon the above. Particularly Vrba's connection with Brit=Israeli Intelligence (PWE).


----------

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=16756&p=67867&#p67866

QuoteThe Brand Hoax equals the Jew Holohoax --CSR

The most important point in this is the comment below reportedly by Moshe Sarret.

QuoteSharett wrote in his report of 27 June 1944: "I must have looked a little incredulous, for he said: 'Please believe me: they have killed six million Jews; there are only two million left alive'." <:^0

    Moshe Sharett, then head of the Jewish Agency's political department (later Israel's second prime minister), met Brand in Aleppo, after Brand's arrest by the British.


Looks like the 6 million figure was tossed around by British Intelligence and high level Jews in the British government. Murdering 800,000 Jews from Hungary-Romania-SE Europe via "Gas Chambers" at Auschwitz and disposing of the bodies after June 1944 would have been logistically impossible -- and that was just before the Soviet invasions so in terms of utilizing resources it doesn't make sense -- there just wouldn't be enough time or German manpower to do it. The Brits probably used this entire thing as a denial to a "peace settlement" that the Germans were extending to the "Western Allies" -- to pair up against the Soviet Union. The Jews put themselves between a Nazi-Western Allied settlement with this British-Jew Intel story about Brand. Some Jews may have been shipped from Hungary to Auschwitz (to work) but British-Jew Intel picked it up and concocted the entire "Holohoax" with it. This is before the "liberation of the camps".

This is just an idea but the fact that the 6 million number was thrown around before the end of WWII by these high level Jews-British Intel -- then, this "Scam" could be used internally as a way to stop any future "alliance" between Nazi Germany and Western Allies against the Soviets. The Germans were losing and sought a "settlement" with the British-Americans after D-Day. Brand's story "Blood for Goods" could be used to white-wash Brit refusal of peace negotiations with the Germans and lend credence to the whole Holohoax Propaganda.

So British Intel-Jews already know that 6 million have been killed with nearly a year in WWII to go? This indicates to me that the entire "Zionist-Nazi" collaboration story is probably a British Intel Hoax like the Holohoax itself. With the US invading and Soviets winning in the East, Brit-US Jews knew they eventually had Germany in the box. So, they built a War Propaganda "guilt campaign" against Germany with the "Holohoax" using Brand as a character in the story. There may have been some meetings, but the Brits saw the utility in using the Brand-6 million story for "Hoaxing" the Western Goyim fighting the war. --CSR

---------

QuoteMuller describes once eating cheese and cake he found in the gas chamber after a gassing.[1]

<:^0 (Right... cheese and cake soaked with cyanide... still another J-Triber lie that damns many even today...maybe it was wrapped with 1944 Ghetto Plastic like "Holohoax Saran Wrap"??? Could be, right? That's what made it okay and propaganda "safe" --plastic wrap. --CSR )

The Vrba-Wetzler Report
(used to create the Holohoax by Brit-Jew Intelligence. The report itself is full of B.S. if simple "daily logistical operations" are fully considered. --CSR)


The report is often referred to as the Auschwitz Protocols, although in fact the Protocols incorporated information from three reports, including the Vrba-Wetzler report.

The text of the Vrba-Wetzler report, under the title "German Extermination Camps—Auschwitz and Birkenau," was first published in full in English on 25 November 1944 by the Executive Office of the United States War Refugee Board.[2] The document combined the material from Vrba and Wetzler with two other reports, which came to be known jointly as the Auschwitz Protocols. They were submitted together in evidence at the Nuremberg Trials as document number 022-L.[1]


........SNIP..........

     
QuoteAt present there are four crematoria in operation at BIRKENAU, two large ones, I and II, and two smaller ones, III and IV. Those of type I and II consist of 3 parts, i.e.,: (A) the furnace room; (B) the large halls; and (C) the gas chamber. A huge chimney rises from the furnace room around which are grouped nine furnaces, each having four openings. Each opening can take three normal corpses at once and after an hour and a half the bodies are completely burned. This corresponds to a daily capacity of about 2,000 bodies. Next to this is a large "reception hall" which is arranged so as to give the impression of the antechamber of a bathing establishment. It holds 2,000 people and apparently there is a similar waiting room of the floor below. From there a door and a few steps lead down into the very long and narrow gas chamber. The walls of this chamber are also camouflaged with simulated entries to shower rooms in order to mislead the victims. This roof is fitted with three traps which can be hermetically closed from the outside. A track leads from the gas chamber to the furnace room.

    The gassing takes place as follows: the unfortunate victims are brought into hall (B) where they are told to undress. To complete the fiction that they are going to bathe, each person receives a towel and a small piece of soap issued by two men clad in white coats. They are then crowded into the gas chamber (C) in such numbers there is, of course, only standing room. To compress this crowd into the narrow space, shots are often fired to induce those already at the far end to huddle still closer together.

    When everybody is inside, the heavy doors are closed. Then there is a short pause, presumably to allow the room temperature to rise to a certain level, after which SS men with gas masks climb on the roof, open the traps, and shake down a preparation in powder form out of tin cans labeled "CYKLON" "For use against vermin," which is manufactured by a Hamburg concern. It is presumed that this is a "CYANIDE" mixture of some sort which turns into gas at a certain temperature. After three minutes everyone in the chamber is dead. No one is known to have survived this ordeal, although it was not uncommon to discover signs of life after the primitive measures employed in the Birch Wood. The chamber is then opened, aired, and the "special squad" carts the bodies on flat trucks to the furnace rooms where the burning takes place. Crematoria III and IV work on nearly the same principle, but their capacity is only half as large. Thus the total capacity of the four cremating and gassing plants at BIRKENAU amounts to about 6,000 daily.[10]

<:^0 (Moving 2,000 to 6,000 Cyanide soaked bodies and then burning them all to nothing in a single day??? Logistically impossible given the inputs and outputs. It is simply Jew-Brit Intel war propaganda (PWE). -- CSR)
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

FrankDialogue

#12
December 01, 2012, 11:31:03 AM
QuoteSo British Intel-Jews already know that 6 million have been killed with nearly a year in WWII to go? This indicates to me that the entire "Zionist-Nazi" collaboration story is probably a British Intel Hoax like the Holohoax itself. With the US invading and Soviets winning in the East, Brit-US Jews knew they eventually had Germany in the box. So, they built a War Propaganda "guilt campaign" against Germany with the "Holohoax" using Brand as a character in the story. There may have been some meetings, but the Brits saw the utility in using the Brand-6 million story for "Hoaxing" the Western Goyim fighting the war. --CSR

I agree with most of this, except the Zio-National Socialist collaboration.

I won't cite the sources right now, as I don't have the time, but I will try to later, or you can verify yourself.

The National Socialists active aided any Jew who wanted to go to Palestine: I believe the price for moving there with any assets was approximately 1000 (dollars or marks?).

Also Hitler set up special agricultural training programs in Germany for Jews who were going to Palestine, government payed, where the Jewish hexagram flag was flow, same as Israeli flag...This was the only flag other than German flag the was allowed to be displayed in Germany.

QuoteIn 1941, In 1941, Haj Amin al-Husseini fled to Germany and met with Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, Joachim Von Ribbentrop and other Nazi leaders. He wanted to persuade them to extend the Nazis' anti-Jewish program to the Arab world.

Now, the Mufti, who was Yasser Arafat's uncle, wanted the Germans to ally with the Arabs to insure Muslim jurisdiction in Jerusalem, and to aid the Germans in their plans for the Middle East, which was called 'Operation Orient'.

BUT, Hitler tell him ''No, Palestine is for the Jews'...He maybe not use these exact words, but this was the intent...A GERMAN controlled Israel!

This whole deal foiled when Rommel never reach the Suez Canal.

Germans also had contingency plans for 'Jew Autonomous Republic' in Poland, called 'Judeo-Polonia'...This one reason why Poles opposed Hitler...Little know facts.

Talk more later.

FrankDialogue

#13
December 01, 2012, 07:15:20 PM
JUDEO POLONIA


One view...



On the 11th of November 1918, Independent Poland was resurrected. The Poles, between 1918 and 1922 fought six concurrent wars on the borders of Poland. Poland's borders were then defined. And Poles paid dearly for it. With their own blood.

On the 12th of November 1918, Zionists demanded a separate Jewish constitution, a Jewish national government including a secretary of state, and a formal Jewish state in Poland.

And this was supposed to be called Judeo - Polonia. Not many Poles are aware that in the first 20 years of the XX century Poland had not only to deal with the partitioning powers and Bolsheviks, but also there was an internal enemy, an enemy who with all its powers opposed establishing of the independent Polish State.

During the last years of WWI Polish, Ukrainian and Lithuanian Jews strongly opposed the rebirth of independent Poland, and instead demanded establishment of the independent Jewish State in the region of Lublin, with the city of Lublin becoming it's capital on the grounds that it was a place of residence of the Jewish Waad (parliament), during the First Commonwealth (Rzeczpospolita Szlachecka).

Such a monster established on the Polish land was an idea of the Russian Jew from Odessa, publicist and Zionist leader, Wlodzimierz Zabotynski (Vladimir Jabotinski, Zeev Yabotinsky, Jabotynsky: note: the kike who helped establish the current fraud state of Israel...Frank D.), who was the first to use the term Judeo - Polonia.

On the German side, in 1914 the German Committee for Freedom of the Russian Jews (Deutschen Komittee zur Befreiung der russischen Juden) also proposed the project of Judeo - Polonia. (Piotr Wrobel Wiez VII-VIII 1986). The Committee was warning Germany against re-establishing of the Polish Independent State, but suggested creation of the so-called "buffer state" on the Polish lands under the Russian occupation. Ethnic composition of such a creation was supposed to be: 6mln. Jews, 1.8mln. Germans, 8mln. Poles, 5-6mln. Ukrainians, 4mln. Belorussians and 3.5mln. of Latvians and Lithuanians.

The King of this State supposed to be someone from the House of Hohenzollern, German language would be an official language (Yiddish is just a "bastardization" of the German language), German officers corps (with the Polish recruits as a "cannon fodder" of course) and the German culture. And of course, the capital of this State would be Lublin.

Poland was very lucky indeed that Germany lost WWI and this German - Jewish plans didn't eventuate. If the Germans won, such plans would be equal to the total annihilation of any thought about Polish independence. The Poles in the Prussian and Austrian partition would be totally isolated and subjected to the germanisation, and Judeo - Polonia would be ruled by the German Jews, the Poles and other nationalities such as Ukrainians and Belo Russians probably reduced to the status of slave labour. Governor Beseler was already assembling "Polnische Wermacht" staffed by the German officers with the Polish recruits, and who was to be this new Judeo - Polonia King from the House of Hohenzollern? We don't know. But the plans were there, in the stage of implementation, and were only stopped by the defeat of Germany.

http://www.naszawitryna.pl/jedwabne_en_110.html

Now, I believe this plan was still around (remember that both Germany and Russia had thought about it during WWI, as a place to dump the Jews, AND assuming that a renewed independent Poland wouldn't exist) with Hitler & his krewe and, in fact, they did start dumping Jews in Poland after Germany TOTALLY over ran Poland through Operation Barbarossa...What wasn't known during WWI was that Jewish Communism would take over in Russia, that Germany would collapse, and that Marshall Josef Pilsudski would both bring about a re-emerged Poland, and save the defeated GERMANY from Bolshevism by defeating the Red Army at the Battle of Warsaw/The Vistula in 1920...Frank



Marshall Iosef Pilsudski

Miracle on the Vistula-the 1920 Battle of Warsaw

 

The Fatherland is in need! All men of good will and capable of carrying arms are called to the colours. The entire nation must resist like a solid, immovable barrier. It is on our breasts that the flood of Bolshevism will be broken. May unity, amity, and undying toll bring us together for the common cause. All for victory! To arms!

-(Polish) Council of National Defense, July 3

Great read:
http://josephpilsudski.com/miracle-on-the-vistulathe-1920-battle-of-warsaw_297.html

You must understand this to understand the basis of Operation Barbarossa, and why Poland opposed Hitler.

Also, understand that the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth was the major power in central Europe TWO CENTURIES before the notion of a German nation was even a twinkling in the German eye!...It had the first parliament in Europe (although the same parliament would eventual lead to the partition of Poland).

CrackSmokeRepublican

#14
December 02, 2012, 02:57:48 AM
Looks like the Brits were simply enthusiastic Jew "Whores" in the entire war (like the propagated Americans).  

--------------

How Britain tortured Nazi PoWs: The horrifying interrogation methods that belie our proud boast that we fought a clean war

By Ian Cobain

PUBLISHED: 17:34 EST, 26 October 2012 | UPDATED: 17:35 EST, 26 October 2012



The German SS officer was fighting to save himself from the gallows for a terrible war crime and might say anything to escape the noose. But Fritz Knöchlein was not lying in 1946 when he claimed that, in captivity in London, he had been tortured by British soldiers to force a confession out of him.

Tortured by British soldiers? In captivity? In London? The idea seems incredible.

Britain has a reputation as a nation that prides itself on its love of fair play and respect for the rule of law. We claim the moral high ground when it comes to human rights. We were among the first to sign the 1929 Geneva Convention on the humane treatment of prisoners of war.

QuoteTainted: Bindfolded German soldiers may have been forced into untrue admissions, it has been revealed

Surely, you would think, the British avoid torture? But you would be wrong, as my research into what has gone on behind closed doors for decades shows.

It was in 2005 during my work as an investigative reporter that I came across a veiled mention of a World War II detention centre known as the London Cage. It took a number of Freedom Of Information requests to the Foreign Office before government files were reluctantly handed over.

From these, a sinister world unfolded — of a torture centre that the British military operated throughout the Forties, in complete secrecy, in the heart of one of the most exclusive neighbourhoods in the capital.

Thousands of Germans passed through the unit that became known as the London Cage, where they were beaten, deprived of sleep and forced to assume stress positions for days at a time.

Some were told they were to be murdered and their bodies quietly buried. Others were threatened with unnecessary surgery carried out by people with no medical qualifications. Guards boasted that they were 'the English Gestapo'.

The London Cage was part of a network of nine 'cages' around Britain run by the Prisoner of War Interrogation Section (PWIS), which came under the jurisdiction of the Directorate of Military Intelligence.
QuoteOut in the open: Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Scotland revealed some secrets in his controversial book about interrogating German officers, 'The London Cage'

Three, at Doncaster, Kempton Park and Lingfield, were at hastily converted racecourses. Another was at the ground of Preston North End Football Club. Most were benignly run.

But prisoners thought to possess valuable information were whisked off to a top-secret unit in a row of grandiose Victorian villas in Kensington Palace Gardens, then (as now) one of the smartest locations in London.

Today, the tree-lined street a stone's throw from Kensington Palace is home to ambassadors and billionaires, sultans and princes. Houses change hands for £50 million and more.

Yet it was here, seven decades ago, in five interrogation rooms, in cells and in the guardroom in numbers six, seven and eight Kensington Palace Gardens, that nine officers, assisted by a dozen NCOs, used whatever methods they thought necessary to squeeze information from suspects.

Of course, it is crucial to put these events into context. When the gloves first came off at Britain's interrogation centres — the summer of 1940 — German forces were racing across France and the Low Countries, and Britain was fighting for its very survival. The stakes could not have been higher.

In the following years, large parts of Britain's cities were left in ruins, hundreds of thousands of service personnel and civilians died, and barely a day passed without evidence emerging of a new Nazi atrocity. Little wonder, perhaps, that it was felt acceptable for German prisoners to suffer in British interrogation centres.

And it should also be said that whatever went on within their walls, it paled into insignificance compared with the horrors the Nazis visited on millions of prisoners.

So, how can we be sure about the methods used at the London Cage? Because the man who ran it admitted as much — and was hushed up for half-a-century by an establishment fearful of the shame his story would bring on a Britain that had been fighting for honesty, decency and the rule of law.

That man was Colonel Alexander Scotland, an accepted master in techniques of interrogation. After the war, he wrote a candid account of his activities in his memoirs, in which he recalled how he would muse, on arriving at the Cage each morning: 'Abandon all hope ye who enter here.'

Because, he said, before going into detail: 'If any German had any information we wanted, it was invariably extracted from him in the long run.'

As was customary, before publication Scotland submitted his manuscript to the War Office for clearance in 1954. Pandemonium erupted. All four copies were seized. All those who knew of its contents were silenced with threats of prosecution under the Official Secrets Act.

What caused the greatest consternation was his admission that the horrors had continued after the war, when interrogators switched from extracting military intelligence to securing convictions for war crimes.

QuoteFeared: Col Robin 'Tin Eye' Stephens was prepared to seek his own rough justice

Of 3,573 prisoners who passed through Kensington Palace Gardens, more than 1,000 were persuaded to sign a confession or give a witness statement  for use in war crimes prosecutions.

Fritz Knöchlein, a former lieutenant colonel in the Waffen SS, was one such case. He was suspected of ordering the machine-gunning of 124 British soldiers who surrendered at Le Paradis in northern France during the Dunkirk evacuation in 1940. His defence was that he was not even there.

At his trial, he claimed he had been tortured in the London Cage after the war. He was deprived of sleep for four days and nights after arriving in October 1946 and forced to walk in a tight circle for four hours while being kicked by a guard at each turn.

He was made to clean stairs and lavatories with a tiny rag, for days at a time, while buckets of water were poured over him. If he dared to rest, he was cudgelled. He was also forced to run in circles in the grounds of the house while carrying heavy logs and barrels. When he complained, the treatment simply got worse.

Nor was he the only one. He said men were repeatedly beaten about the face and had hair ripped from their heads. A fellow inmate begged to be killed because he couldn't take any more brutality.

All Knöchlein's accusations were ignored, however. He was found guilty and hanged.

Suspects in another high-profile war crime — the shooting of 50 RAF officers who broke out from a prison camp, Stalag Luft III, in what became known as the Great Escape — also passed through the Cage.

Of the 21 accused, 14 were hanged after a war-crimes trial in Hamburg. Many confessed only after being interrogated by Scotland and his men. In court, they protested that they had been starved, whipped and systematically beaten. Some said they had been  menaced with red-hot pokers and 'threatened with electrical devices'.

Scotland, of course, denied allegations of torture, going into the witness box at one trial after another to say his accusers were lying.

It was all the more surprising, then, that a few years later he was willing to come clean about the techniques he employed at the London Cage.

In his memoirs, he disclosed that a number of men were forced to incriminate themselves. A general was sentenced to death in 1946 after signing a confession at the Cage while, in Scotland's words, 'acutely depressed after the various examinations'.
Flashback: The prisoners in the dock are Nazi leaders Hermann Goering and Rudolph Hess - it is unknown how they might have been treated in prison

Flashback: The prisoners in the dock are Nazi leaders Hermann Goering and Rudolph Hess - it is unknown how they might have been treated in prison

A naval officer was convicted on the basis of a confession that Scotland said he had signed only after being 'subject to certain degrading duties'.

Scotland also acknowledged that one of the men accused of the 'Great Escape' murders went to the gallows even though he had confessed after he had — in Scotland's own words — been 'worked on psychologically'. At his trial, the man insisted he had been 'worked on' physically as well.

Others did not share Scotland's eagerness to boast about what had gone on in Kensington Park Gardens. An MI5 legal adviser who read his manuscript concluded that Scotland and fellow interrogators had been guilty of a 'clear breach' of the Geneva Convention.

They could have faced war-crimes charges themselves for forcing prisoners to stand to attention for more than 24 hours at a time; forcing them to kneel while they were beaten about the head; threatening to have them shot; threatening one prisoner with an unnecessary appendix operation to be performed on him by another inmate with no medical qualifications.

Appalled by the embarrassment his manuscript would cause if it ever came out, the War Office and the Foreign Office both declared that it would never see the light of day.

Two years later, however, they were forced to strike a deal with him after he threatened to publish his book abroad. He was told he would never be allowed to recover his original manuscript, but agreement was given to a rewritten version in which every line of incriminating material had been expunged.

World War II Victory Day June 1946; Marshall of the Royal Air Force, Lord Tedder, salutes the crowds in Parliament Square during the Victory Day Parade

A heavily censored version of The London Cage duly appeared in the bookshops in 1957.
But officials at the War Office, and their successors at the Ministry of Defence, remained troubled.

Years later, in September 1979, Scotland's publishers wrote to the Ministry of Defence out of the blue asking for a copy of the original manuscript  by the now dead colonel for their archives.

The request triggered fresh panic as civil servants sought reasons to deny the request. But in the end they quietly deposited a copy in what is now the National Archives at Kew, where it went unnoticed — until I found it a quarter of a century later.

Is there more to tell about the London Cage? Almost certainly. Even now, some of the MoD's files on it remain beyond reach.

Scotland, his interrogators, technicians and typists, and the towering guardsmen left the building in January 1949. The villas were unoccupied for several years.

Eventually, numbers six and seven were leased to the Soviet Union, which was looking for a new embassy building. Today, they house the chancery of the Russian embassy.

Number eight — where it is thought the worst excesses were carried out — remained empty. It was too large to be a family home in the post-war years and in too poor a state of repair to be converted to offices. By 1955, the building had fallen into such disrepair it was sold to a developer, who knocked it down and built a block of three luxury flats. One that went on the market in 2006 was valued at £13.5 million.

The Cage was not, however, Britain's only secret interrogation centre during and after World War II. MI5 also operated an interrogation centre, code-named Camp 020, at Latchmere House, a Victorian mansion near Ham Common in South-West London, whose 30 rooms were turned into cells with hidden microphones.


Horror: Liverpool after the Blitz - but were the real perpetrators brought to justice?

The first of the German spies who arrived in Britain in September 1940 were taken there. Vital information about a coming German invasion was extracted at great speed. This indicates the use of extreme methods, but these were desperate days demanding desperate measures. In charge was Colonel Robin Stephens, known as 'Tin Eye', because of the monocle fixed to his right eye.

It was not a term of affection. The object of interrogation, Stephens told his officers, was simple: 'Truth in the shortest possible time.' A top secret memo spoke of 'special methods', but did not elaborate.

He arranged for an additional 92-cell block to be added to Latchmere House, plus a punishment room — known chillingly as Cell 13 — which was completely bare, with smooth walls and a linoleum floor.

Close to 500 people passed through the gates of Camp 020. Principal among them were German spies, many of whom were 'turned' and persuaded — or maybe forced — to work for MI5.

Its first inmates were members of the British Union of Fascists.  Some were held in cells brightly lit 24 hours a day, others in cells kept in total darkness.

Several prisoners were subjected to mock executions and were knocked about by the guards. Some were apparently left naked for months at a time.

Camp 020 had a resident medical officer, Harold Dearden, a psychiatrist who dreamed up regimes of starvation and of sleep and sensory deprivation intended to break the will of its inmates. He experimented in techniques of torment that left few marks — methods that could be denied by the torturers and that civil servants and government ministers could disown.

These techniques surfaced again after the war in a British interrogation facility at Bad Nenndorf, a German spa town, in one of the internment camps for those considered a threat to the Allied occupation.
QuoteIn the four years after the war, 95,000 people were interned in the British zone of Allied-occupied Germany. Some were interrogated by what was now termed the Intelligence Division

In charge of Bad Nenndorf was 'Tin Eye' Stephens, on attachment from MI5, and drawing on his Camp 020 experiences. An inmate recalled him yelling questions at prisoners and then punching them.

Over the next two years, 372 men and 44 women would pass through his hands. One German inmate recalled being told by a British intelligence officer: 'We are not bound by any rules or regulations. We do not care a damn whether you leave this place on a stretcher or in a hearse.'

He was made to sleep on a wet floor in a temperature of minus 20 degrees for three days. Four of his toes had to be amputated due to frostbite.

A doctor in a nearby hospital complained about the number of detainees brought to him filthy, confused and suffering from multiple injuries and frostbite. Many were painfully emaciated after months of starvation. A number died.

The regime was intended to weaken, humiliate and intimidate prisoners.

With complaints soaring, a British court of inquiry was convened to investigate what had been going at Bad Nenndorf. It concluded that former inmates' allegations of physical assault were substantially correct. Stephens and four other officers were arrested while Bad Nenndorf was abruptly closed.
But there was a quandary for the Labour government. The political fallout could be deeply damaging. There were other similar interrogation centres in Germany.

From the very top, there were urgent moves to hush things up.

Stephens' court martial for ill-treatment of prisoners was heard behind closed doors. He did not deny any of the horrors. His defence was that he had no idea the prisoners for whom he was responsible were being beaten, whipped, frozen, deprived of sleep and starved to death.

This was the very defence that had been offered — unsuccessfully — by Nazi concentration camp commandants at war-crimes trials. But he was acquitted.

The suspicion remains that he got off because, if cruelties did occur at Bad Nenndorf, they had been authorised by government ministers.

Extracted from Cruel Britannia by Ian Cobain, published by Portobello Books at £18.99. © Ian Cobain 2012. To order a copy for £15.99 (p&p free), call 0843 382 0000.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... l#comments
After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar\'s sequestered funds. In November 1917,  Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed the Romanoff gold and jewels. The gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.-- Curse of Canaan

FrankDialogue

#15
December 02, 2012, 10:27:10 AM
Torture by the Brits security apparatus doesn't surprise me...But these are lower level apparatchiks and psychos who take their lead from the corrupt British elite, which from
Lloyd George, through Churchill and on and on, have been mostly been pimps driven by the money men, which in Britain means the Rothschilds and their partners...

The Brits betrayed Poland numerous times, and the Poles were fools to ever believe in them...Just as an aside, most people don't know, that after they sold the Poles out to Hitler and Stalin, the Poles contributed a squadron of elite pilots to the RAF, and these pilots saved the UK ass during the Battle of Britain...A Pole also broke the German cypher key for the Brits.

In any case, it continues to this day, through Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron and let's not forget Thatcher...

I have recently read an interesting article concerning David Cameron: it suggests that during the Thatcher era, 'Maggie' negotiated the purchase of three atomic bombs from the South African government, which was collapsing, and was trying to dispose of some of it's weapons, into presumably friendly hands, as to not let the ANC or it's communist allies get access, presumably...However, these bombs are reportedly missing, and Thatcher's assistant on this deal was one Dr. David Kelly, the 'suicided' scientist...Apparently, the UK sold at least one of the bombs, and Cameron is now managing the coverup...Now, missing nuclear bombs are a very big deal...A coverup going on?...See how it works?

In any case, torture of Germans (or anyone)doesn't surprise me by the hypocritical Brits, who are big holohoax enablers...Nothing surprise me with this people.

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2010/10/david-cameron-missing-nukes-and-17.html

A lot of web sites have run with this, also.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions