Gordon Duff Dodges Nazi-Holocaust Interview

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

hmm...if blacks were Jews...and everyone can somewhat agree on that...then why couldn't Jews be Nazis too?...just curious.

Well, Blacks weren't robbing the "German people" blind in the 1920s???
The Jew Bolsheviks did import a few of them into Bolshevik Russia back in 1918 to rule over the Russian people.  
The Germans did not want any Jews corrupting Germany like they did in the 1920s. Fool me once...


BTW, here's a good question for you SpecTec:

According to this description by Dr. Livingstone, are Alex Jonestein, /tab, Mgt23 and thirdeyewise actually all on the "same page" -- it is the Queen of England as a Satanic Bloodline?     Or is it -- Jews...... ?  

[youtube:4bydv0re]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qP_cYfMP4Rg[/youtube]4bydv0re]

http://www.irishoriginsofcivilization.c ... thras.html

Jacob Rothschild is the current head of the UK Rothschild family, having inherited the fourth baronetcy from his father, Victor, an eminent zoologist, and sometime MI5 agent and friend of KGB agents Anthony Blunt and Guy Burgess. Jacob resigned from the family's bank NM Rothschilds in 1980, run by his cousin Evelyn, and started RIT Capital Partners. Jacob is chairman of Yad Hanadiv, the Rothschild foundation, which chairs the Jewish Policy Research, dedicated to promoting issues affecting Jews worldwide. Yad Hanadiv was also responsible for building and granting the Knesset government buildings, and the Supreme Court of Israel, which prominently features Masonic symbolism and the pyramid and all-seeing eye of the Illuminati. Jacob was a close personal friend of Princess Diana, and maintains strong personal and business links with Henry Kissinger. His country estate has been a regular venue for visiting heads of state including Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. Margaret Thatcher received French President François Mitterrand there at a summit in 1990. He hosted the European Economic Round Table conference in 2002, attended by such figures as James Wolfensohn, president of the World Bank, Nicky Oppenheimer, Warren Buffet and Arnold Schwarzenegger. He knows Rupert Murdoch well, having been friends since the Australian newspaper magnate first came to the UK in the 60s.

Sabbatai Zevi (1626-1676)

Nathan of Gaza (16??-?)

Jacob Frank (1726-1791)

The Rothschilds

Three connections between Satanism, evil, and money.

Money naturally attracts itself to evil. For instance, if a woman prostitutes herself she may receive a great sum of money, but who will pay her for keeping her virginity or her dignity? If you are a hit man a large amount of money is yours if you kill your target, who will pay you if you would miss your target?

Second, evil men believe in where there is a will there is a way, and they are willing to sell their souls for their God money. They will employ evil to gain money.

While most people are quite aware of these last two connections, a third may likely have escaped their attention. Thirdly, the principle group of men who cranked up International Banking were Satanists from the beginning. These Satanists now are the ones who run the Federal Reserve and are responsible for the creation of U.S. Federal Reserve notes. Just having total control over the supply of U.S. paper money almost gives them leverage over the world's finances, without mentioning they control the world bank. It is no accident then, that once they established world financial control, they would do all in their power to divide and conquer and destroy both the Christian and the Moslem faith in God. These powerful Bankers relate to faith in God as Cain related to his brother Abel. That they may be related to the Jewish people, does not mean they have the Jewish people's best interest at heart. Initially Sabbetai Zevi was rejected by many Jews. His sect gained momentum in second half of the seventeenth century in southeastern Poland.(42) In 1759-60, 500 Jewish Sabbateans ,,converted" to Christianity.43 In 1715, 109 of the 415 Jewish families in Frankfurt were engaged in moneylending. The rest were merchants of various kinds. The concepts that Satanism holds to were a natural shoe in to justify for many of these Jewish bankers the type of behavior they were engaged in." (44)

Long-Story Short

Many divisions and battles between religious elements in the world have been encouraged and supported by the Power's wealth. Unfortunately, many have been fooled into thinking that being devout and faithful to God is the source of religious fighting. In some areas of the world, Moslems, Christians, and others have gotten along fine for centuries. Religious tensions do spring to some degree from within the religions themselves, but the fuel to keep those fires burning and to light up conflicts often come from the Power's wealth. An obvious example is the Iran-Iraq war.

Co-Masters of the World –Control Over W.W. I Treaty

When Germany fell, not only did Rothschild agents draft the treaty, prepare the idea of the League of Nations, but Max Rothschild was one of 11 men who took control over Bavaria. Max Rothschild was a Freemason in Lodge No. 11, Munich, Germany.

Co-Masters of the World –connections to MI5, Rockefellers, J.P. Morgan, CFR, et.al.

Victor Rothschild

Victor Rothschild, who worked for J.P. Morgan & Co., and was an important part of MI5 (British Intelligence). Victor Rothschild was also a communist and member of the Apostles Club at Cambridge.45 Lord Rothschild was one of the original members of Rhode's Round Table group which developed into the CFR. It was the Rothschilds who had financed Cecil Rhodes, beginning in Africa. The Rothschilds' have several agents which their money got started and who still serve them well, the Morgans and the Rockefellers. The Rockefellers were Marrano Jews. The original Rockefeller made his money selling narcotics, (they weren't illegal then). After acquiring a little capital he branched out in oil. But it was the Rothschild capital that made the Rockefeller's so powerful. "They also financed the activities of Edward Harriman (railroads) and Andrew Carnegie Steel."(46)

Extent of Rothschild Power

According to one source "it was estimated that they controlled half the wealth of the world."(50) The Federal Reserve Bank of New York was controlled by five banks which owned 53% of its stock. These five banks were controlled by Nathan M. Rothschild & Sons of London. Control over the U.S. Fed is basically control over the world's money. That fact alone shows how immense the Rothschild Power is. If one examines who has been appointed to head the Fed, and to run it, the connections of the "Federal" Reserve System to the Rothschilds can further be seen. Another private enterprise using the name Federal that the Rothschilds also direct is Federal Express. Any one else might be taken to court for making their businesses sound like their are government, not the Rothschilds. It is appropriate for them to appropriate the name of Federal, because by way of MI6 via the CIA they instruct the U.S. government. Senators are bought and paid off by their system, as investigators of the BCCI are discovering. The Rothschilds have been intimately involved in witchcraft and the Illuminati since its early known history. The Kaiser of Germany seems to refer to them when he said, "the magic powers of money as wielded by the Lord of Lucre are powers of Black Magic at its blackest."51

If only half of the wealth is controlled by the Rothschilds, it indicates that if they are to be part of the world's rulership, they must have allies.

http://antioligarch.wordpress.com/2010/ ... thschilds/

Smells Jewish to me... and I'll fight it. --CSR

Was Rothschild a descendant of Shabbetai Tzi?

Did Shabbetai Tzvi have offspring? Yes. Where are they now? Where is this Messianic Dynasty? Have they vanished into obscurity? History leaves us no clues. Or does it? Perhaps Shabbatai did succeed in his messianic takeover of the planet. Perhaps his offspring did manage to fulfill the mission of their prophet-proclaimed Messiah father? I suggest that the family Rothschild are direct descendents of the messiah, Shabbatai Tzvi. Shabbatai Tzvi said that he would rebuild Israel. The Rothschilds did. He said that he would re-unite the lost tribes that had been spread out throughout the world. Has this been accomplished through the United Nations? Is the UN a project of hidden Rothschild influence designed to bring world peace? A Rothshild-Shabbatai Tzvi connection would also explain the Rothschilds' relationship to the mystical Jacob Frank, a co-creator of the Illuminati, who claimed to be the reincarnation of Shabbetai Tzvi. It would also explain the Rothschilds strange obsession with their bloodline and their custom of intermarrying amongst themselves. Was this practice determined to keep the royal messianic blood from assimilation? A Rothschildian/Messianic relationship would also explain their lavish and opulent lifestyle. Why shouldn't the direct descendants of the messiah live within the finest palaces on Earth?

http://cliffordshack.com/shabbetai_rothschild.html

In 1884, a Mademoiselle Justine Glinka, the daughter of a Russian general, was engaged in Paris in gathering political information for the court of Tzar Alexander III.

Glinka employed a Jewish agent named Joseph Schoerst, alias Shapiro, who had passed himself off as a Freemason and a member of the Mizraim Lodge, a Jewish Masonic order with its own particular rites and protocols. None other than Solomon Rothschild, scion of the Jewish banking dynasty, was a prominent member of the French Freemasons.

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9328&start=15

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Almost forgot, but I'm sure a few in Germany knew that quote well especially after WWI:

"I fear the Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America. And use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos that the earth should become their inheritance." — Bismarck

British Subject becomes Israeli Citizen... Jew Scammer of course... but aren't they all?

Chaim Weitzman (1874-1952)

Weitzman was a Russian born chemist and Zionist leader, who became the first president of modern Israel (1949-1952).

Weizmann was born on November 27, 1874, in Motol, Russia (now in Belarus), and was educated in Germany and Switzerland at the universities of Berlin and Fribourg. He became lecturer in chemistry at the University of Geneva in 1901 and reader in biochemistry at the University of Manchester in 1904. In 1910 he became a British subject. While director (1916-1919) of the British admiralty laboratories, he was responsible for the discovery and development of a method for synthesizing acetone, used in explosives manufacturing.

During his student days, Weizmann had become interested in Zionism, and he was an early leader of the movement. He was instrumental in securing proclamation in 1917 by the British government of the Balfour Declaration, endorsing the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine. Weizmann was president (1921-1929) of the World Zionist Organization, acting as a force for compromise between those who wanted immediate implementation of the declaration and the British and Arabs who resisted any such moves. From 1929 to 1931 and from 1935 to 1946 he held the office of president of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, a semi-governmental organization under the British mandatory authorities; he thus exercised some political authority over Jewish residents of Palestine.

Weizmarm moved to Palestine in 1934 and served also as director of the Daniel Sieff Research Institute at Rehovot and as president of the board of governors of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. During World War II, he was honorary adviser to the British ministry of supply. In 1948 Weizmann was named president of the provisional government; the following year he became the first president of the new nation of Israel.

The Weizmarm Institute of Science, incorporating the Sieff Institute, was founded at Rehovot in 1949, and Weizmann was appointed director. His research there, largely in agronomy, involved crop production and soil management and the development of new protein foodstuffs. The Weitzman institute is still an excellence for science today.

His autobiography, Trial and Error, was published in 1949. He died in Rehovot (Israel) on November 9, 1952.

Especially insignificant was the matter of Palestine to Americans. British diplomats consulted with Woodrow Wilson's government before publishing the Balfour Declaration. Americans initially advised against it, but then they reversed their position after Chaim Weitzman asked Louis Brandeis, the American Supreme Court Justice, to lobby for the declaration with the president's advisers. At the end it was hardly discussed by the White House, and all president Wilson did was to write a note that he had no objections. The American change of position convinced the British government that they were right in their assessment that Jews had a strong influence over the American decision making. Moreover when the rumor started circulating that Germans were planning to issue their own support for the Zionist cause, the British Government had very little choice but to go ahead and give the Balfour Declaration a green light. United States, France and Italy approved it, and when the League of Nations in 1922 ratified the British Mandate in Palestine it included the full text of the Balfour Declaration.

 

Historians can dispute what motivated the British government to issue such a controversial document. Some argue that Britain was trying to get out of the Sykes-Picot agreements, others that it was a reward for Weitzman's contribution to the war, and of course there was an element of using the perceived influence of the World Jewry to their advantage. The answer probably is – all of the above. There were number of factors that had to be taken into consideration at the time when the future of many countries, and even the entire continents, was up in the air.

http://www.jerusalemonmymind.com/balfour.html

http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot. ... story.html

11/25/1917

1917: The Provisional Zionist Committee, chaired by Stephen S. Wise, "sent a cable message of greetings and congratulation to the Zionist mass meeting what held in London" celebrating the adoption of the Balfour Declaration.

1917: A mass meeting of Zionists attended by Lord Walter Lionel Rothschild, Chaim Weitzman, President of the British Zionist Federation and Rabbi Moses Gaster was held in London this evening designed "to celebrate the promise by the British Government ot support the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine.

[SPECTEC]

Lots of info here, CSR...I'm trying to piece it together...

two schools of thought...

Hitler was trying to save Europe from Jewish financial despotism and social controls vs  Hitler was Zionist controlled paid opposition and was used to deliver German Jews to Israel...

I'll keep dissecting it...I havent formed an opinion yet...

I'm considering that maybe both sides of this topic MIGHT BE true...but I dont know.

From Douglas Reed's Somewhere South of Suez, 1951, pages 179-181:

I must for clarity recapitulate this fascinating story as far as it now goes. Early in his twelve years of might, I began to suspect that Hitler was not what he professed to be: merely an arch anti-Communist and anti-Jew. His actions, I thought, would clearly help Communism and Political Zionism (and the outcome of the second war proved this.) I was at first puzzled that he did not see so plain a consequence. Later I thought he did perceive it and was the accomplice of these two powerful forces. Twenty years ago the theory might have been beyond credence. Today, in this century of masks and secret allegiances, it is reasonable.

Note he is not a Jew...

don't get me wrong...I'm not pushing any agenda...I'm just making an observation.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Nazism was a show put on by the European Black Nobility arm of this Jewish conspiracy.
These are "White people" that converted to Judaism over a thousand years ago and are as Jewish as any hooked nose Jew alive. Judaism is an ethnicity and a "religion" but most of all it's a mindset.

"European Black Nobility arm of the Jewish conspiracy"?  :wtf: Let me guess the other arm is the Reptilians, the leg is the Greys, the other leg is the Bohemian Death Cult, and the "Third Eye" controlling the whole conspiracy is Bill Gates' grandmother's pet goat ?

this guy is basically saying "it's white people" now. :clap:

We can expect Thirdeye will be attending the next NOI gathering to rail against the "white devils"  :lol:

[mgt23]

Hitler was trying to save Europe from Jewish financial despotism and social controls vs Hitler was Zionist controlled paid opposition and was used to deliver German Jews to Israel...

slightly modify

Hitler was trying to save Europe from Jewish financial despotism and social controls vs Hitler was Zionist manipulated paid opposition(until he realised he'd gone to far and printed his own money) and was used(unwittingly) to deliver German Jews to Israel...

is a more accurate. i think however this is getting off topic and a new topic should be opened before mods step in.

[/tab]

.
.

CSR wrote . According to this description by Dr. Livingstone, are Alex Jonestein, /tab, Mgt23 and thirdeyewise actually all on the "same page" -- it is the Queen of England as a Satanic Bloodline? Or is it -- Jews...... ?

You really see the world in Black & White Crackie, don't you?



If we don't share your Nazi/Hitler loving views then we are Jewsteins/Jews/"Queen of England as a Satanic Bloodline"



I have some news to you



IF WE  -ALL KIND OF PEOPLE in the World- don't Unite against the ubiquitous ZioN threat,



then we gonna be chanceless & doom, divide & conquer is their motto



And by that I don't mean that White People can't be Proud and cultivate their heritage, at the contrary, we need today more White Warriors by our side












.
.

[HydroMoron]

It be time for Whitey to rise up and take back da muhfuckin' nation. Go Whitey, Go Whitey, Go Whitey (no sarcasm).

Fascism gon' rise in America and Whitey gon' take back da muhfuckin' nation !!!

I be muhfuckin' impartial and don't give a fuck about da muhfuckin' future of this shit - I want shit to get poppin!!!

Whooooooohooooooooh!!!

[thirdeyewise]

How dangerous is the Fascist ideology to Jews when....

They create it:

I'll close with the following: Through the first decade of Fascism in Italy, hundred of Jews joined the Fascist Party including generals and professors, there were even Jewish members of the Fascist Grand Council, and why not Mussolini's mistress was a Jewess and a leading theorist of his movement.
*The Orientalist, Tom Reiss, 2008, P. 318, Random House.

"In my opinion, if the blacks and not the Jews had been persecuted then, many Jews would still be fascists ... In fact, it is the same today. Many Jews in Italy are fascists, because fascism is far closer to today's Israel; they are persecuting the Arabs. If you go to the Rome Ghetto today, you will see that part of the Rome Jewish community is truly fascist, fascist in its mentality, in the head. And the situation in the Middle East complicates matters. They accuse everyone who speaks out against Israel of being anti-Semitic. And in Italian politics they are far closer to the right than to the left."
- Margherita_Sarfatti "Jewish Mother of Fascism"

Jews flocked to Fascism by the thousands:

"In Italy, Jewish fascism was a real ideological movement, a mass phenomenon as much as that was possible in Italy's tiny Jewish population of 47,000. In 1938, at the beginning of the racial laws, more than 10,000 Jews - about one out of every three Jewish adults - were members of the fascist party."
- Alexander Stille "Benevolence and Betrayal: Five Italian Jewish Families Under Fascism"  By pg 22

Eustace Mullins and many others confirm that Fascism was funded by Wall Street

"It was the directors of this one bank in New York, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York which financed Communism and they were active in helping the Nazis and they were active in helping the Fascist in Italy. So, all of these great political movements of the twentieth century came right out of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. That alone is a historical fact which is very significant." – Eustace Mullins

The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government." - American Mercury Magazine, 1957

They even tell us what the end game will be:

But the Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism,so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism."
(A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, pp. 143-144).

Italian Jewish fascists
http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2010/11/italian-jewish-fascists_14.html

And because no one can think for themselves, they run to the ready made antithesis to Communism, like gullible goyim sheep trained to do just that.

"The purely brute mind of the goyim is incapable of analysis and observation...Their eyes are open but see nothing before them..." - Protocols

Fascism simply is....

a trap for the goyim!

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

I guess you've never heard of Ernst Junger...

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

They are going for the "Crown" now... Here you go  :lol: :

Don't be a dupe...

Did first humans come out of Middle East and not Africa? Israeli discovery forces scientists to re-examine evolution of modern man

By Matthew Kalman
Last updated at 7:51 AM on 28th December 2010

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... n-man.html


Professor Avi Gopher, a researcher from Tel Aviv University's Institute of Archaeology, holds a pre-historic tooth at Qesem cave, an excavation site near the town of Rosh Ha'ayin

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Some interesting clips below. Imperial dreams and poor logistics caused failure for Napoleon as well...  

----------------------------------------
UK Bombed German Civilians For
Months Before Germany Responded
12-27-10
 

Hitler responds to Churchill's decision to Genocide German civilians at the beginning of World War 2 after three months of British bombing of German cities...
 
[youtube:1vwmyyie]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bmyn2bQx_qI[/youtube]1vwmyyie]
 
Two Historically Interesting Speeches By Hitler
 
"We Shall Crush The Freemasons"
[youtube:1vwmyyie]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc78hLlai74[/youtube]1vwmyyie]
 
 
Hitler Against Freemasons, International Finance, War Profiteers etc.
[youtube:1vwmyyie]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XqvCCbNUtc[/youtube]1vwmyyie]
 
After the betrayal of Hitler by the Zionists - who wanted BOTH domination of Germany and the Homeland and the declaration of war on Germany by Britain and France - Hitler made this speech:
[youtube:1vwmyyie]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPpEQuatcTU[/youtube]1vwmyyie]
 
"Our Enemies Face The Entire German Folk"
[youtube:1vwmyyie]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn48bPq_t8o[/youtube]1vwmyyie]
 
 
National Socialism -- What Was it?
 
Ernst Zundel expalins why Hitler had to concentrate on race. The Jews were just to wily and manipulating of laws and media for the trusting easy going Germans to handle - so he made a deal with Zionism

Pt One [youtube:1vwmyyie]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx5KhoKYqKQ[/youtube]1vwmyyie]
Pt Two [youtube:1vwmyyie]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQyFeqfINUs[/youtube]1vwmyyie]
Hitler: [youtube:1vwmyyie]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn48bPq_t8o[/youtube]1vwmyyie]
 
 
HITLER: [youtube:1vwmyyie]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n134uPfn_VA[/youtube]1vwmyyie]


http://www.rense.com/general92/yh.htm

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

And because no one can think for themselves, they run to the ready made antithesis to Communism, like gullible goyim sheep trained to do just that.

Riiiight, and which form of goverment have you embraced? Let me guess, the peculiarly African mixture of lawless anarchy and despotism?  

Fascism simply is....

a trap for the goyim!

you belong in that pig pen.
Now... quit wasting our time and go join some black panther voodoo forum or something, thanks.   :yawn:  :yawn:

[thirdeyewise]

Riiiight, and which form of goverment have you embraced? Let me guess, the peculiarly African mixture of lawless anarchy and despotism?  

Fascism simply is....

a trap for the goyim!

you belong in that pig pen.
Now... quit wasting our time and go join some black panther voodoo forum or something, thanks.   :yawn:  :yawn:

This is your admin?

From Douglas Reed's Somewhere South of Suez, 1951, pages 179-181:

I must for clarity recapitulate this fascinating story as far as it now goes. Early in his twelve years of might, I began to suspect that Hitler was not what he professed to be: merely an arch anti-Communist and anti-Jew. His actions, I thought, would clearly help Communism and Political Zionism (and the outcome of the second war proved this.) I was at first puzzled that he did not see so plain a consequence. Later I thought he did perceive it and was the accomplice of these two powerful forces. Twenty years ago the theory might have been beyond credence. Today, in this century of masks and secret allegiances, it is reasonable.

Note he is not a Jew...

Notice how nobody answers pertinent questions like this, or about Hitler's half sister (not step sister) or about all those thousands of Jews in Italian Fascism. They would rather concentrate on some Unprovable cgi crap.

MSMD...with all due respect, Sir...but are you saying Eustace Mullins is peddling junk research too?

Absolutely.

I'll take the research of an award winning investigative Journalist (Douglas Reed) and a world renowned Historian (Eustace Mullins) over the opinion of an obvious Hitler cultist posting his views on a discussion forum. You would be a fool if you didn't.

[Fester]

Good Reed quote, SPEC.  I went looking unsuccessfully for the South of Suez book after seeing it awhile back.  Reed is certainly worth considering, but I'm not sure what he meant by it.  What did Hitler et al do that made the Commies look good?

Yes, the after effects of WWII certainly benefited Zionism.  Since the Allies had to immediately rehabilitate the German military after the war to use against the Commie threat, Hitler appears to have been prescient, no?  

If Reed is referring to other actions which somehow made the Commie thugs look good, I'd be interested to know what he was thinking.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Notice how nobody answers pertinent questions like this,

Your questions aren't "pertinent" they are silly, stupid and strawgrabby. You haven't answered a single question posed to you in this thread so why should anyone answer yours? Selectively quoting/picking and choosing what you want to respond to proves that your theory is thin as paper. You simply cannot answer any logical questions about "your" (or should I say the Jew Dietrich Bronder's) "theory", so you pretend like they were never asked.

I'll take the research of an award winning investigative Journalist (Douglas Reed) and a world renowned Historian (Eustace Mullins) over the opinion of an obvious Hitler cultist posting his views on a discussion forum. You would be a fool if you didn't.

So admittedly you are just a parrot of your two cult heros.

About Douglas Reed. From his wikipedia page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Reed

Douglas Reed (1895–1976) was a British journalist, playwright, novelist and author of a number of books of political analysis. His book Insanity Fair (1938) was one of the most influential in publicising the state of Europe and the megalomania of Adolf Hitler before the Second World War.

So this guy was anti-Hitler before WW2 even began! According to this, Reed's book "Insanity Fair" greatly contributed to creating an anti-Hitler anti-german environment in Britain, thus essentially mobolizing the British public for war against Germany. The guy literally aided WW2's fruition. And this is one of your most trusted sources about Hitler and the Nazis?  :lol: Gimme a break  

How can you trust a Brit to be objective about Hitler? Brits have been lying about Germany since time immemorial. During WW1 the British put out the most grotesque propaganda imaginable, saying German soldiers bayoneted Belgian babies and turned the corpses of their own fallen soldiers into soap (that's right, the Jew soap story was recycled WW1 British propaganda!) http://endwhiteguilt.blogspot.com/2009/ ... false.html
The British are the biggest propagandists out there next to the Jews. Can we expect anything objective about Hitler to come out of the mouth of a Brit from conquered Rothschild territory? Of course not.

[/tab]

.
.

MonkeySeeMonkeyDo wrote: When commenting on Emil Maurice
Does 1/8th semitic blood qualifiy someone as "jew" and "zionist"? :wtf: Does 1/8th African blood make somebody "black" and "black panther", or 1/8th Cherokee blood make someone an "Amerindian"? Only in "nazis were jews" fairyland. The hilarious part is, this thing with maurice is one of the main points they always bring up, and they have to resort to utter distortion and embellishment to even use it as evidence. :lol: Which pretty much tells the tale of this entire theory -- it's an absolute fabrication built upon half-truths, distortions, exaggerations, embellishments, conjecture, and downright lies.

WTF ?   :down:

Emil Maurice was in fact SS number 2, "Founder of the NaZi Troy Horse Machine".


In 1925 . . . Maurice became Hitler's chauffeur.   He had for sure Hitler's ear at hand, maybe a similar role like Rahm Emanuel with Clinton / Obama ?




Sketches by Adolf Hitler, donated to Emil Maurice, his friend and chauffeur, and co-founder of the SS; and documents with full authentication
 








Price: $26,500 for both original Hitler sketches and the original photographs, letters, and authenticating documents shown.

(Emil Maurice) . . . had Jewish ancestry – Charles Maurice Schwartzenberger (1805–1896), the founder of Thalia Theater in Hamburg, was his great-grandfather.

So, Maurice's family were Rich Jews, enough to found a Theater, Remember Hamburg was the city of the Warburgs and many other rich Jewish families.







How do you explain that Emil Maurice was 75 years old when he died ? After all he was involve in ? The Hidden Hand was surely protecting him



Emil Maurice died in February 1972. He was 75 years and 1 month old when he died.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/shop/Maurice/index.html

.
.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Emil Maurice was in fact SS number 2, "Founder of the NaZi Troy Horse Machine".


In 1925 . . . Maurice became Hitler's chauffeur.   He had for sure Hitler's ear at hand, maybe a similar role like Rahm Emanuel with Clinton / Obama ?

Wow a chauffeur huh, yeah, Hitler really took orders from his chauffeur  :roll: , not reaching there at all huh? He wasn't Jewish. Unless one black great-grandfather and 3 white great-grandparents as well as four white grandparents and two white parents makes you a "negro" also, does it?

(Emil Maurice) . . . had Jewish ancestry – Charles Maurice Schwartzenberger (1805–1896), the founder of Thalia Theater in Hamburg, was his great-grandfather.

So, Maurice's family were Rich Jews, enough to found a Theater, Remember Hamburg was the city of the Warburgs and many other rich Jewish families.

How were his "family" rich Jews? He had one Jew who converted three generations back on one side of his family, yet you're claiming his entire family were "rich jews" here? Did Emil Maurice ever meet his great-grandfather? Not likely  :lol: Just another day in bullshit land with /tab the thirdeyelie sockpuppet

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

I'll take the research of an award winning investigative Journalist (Douglas Reed) and a world renowned Historian (Eustace Mullins) over the opinion of an obvious Hitler cultist posting his views on a discussion forum. You would be a fool if you didn't.

I'll take the opinion of a lot of Germans that found in Hitler a way to get rid of a group of very obnoxious scammers, just as Zundel explains in his video.  What do you think Zundel would say about Emile Maurice?  My thought-- "Whatever...".  

From all available evidence, I firmly believe the following:  

1. Hitler was against the Jewish treachery that followed WWI in Germany.  
2. Hitler was not a "Rothschild" or a "Jew Puppet" despite what musings Douglas Reed or others wrote about him. He was a German and NOT a Jew.
3. Several people in Germany and Europe felt that Jewish power had to be removed from their nations by extra-legal means after WWI if necessary. Countries with a political reaction to Jewish Bolshevism were found in Russia, Poland, Romania, Hungary, and even France and England -- these grew up among mostly lower-middle and middle-class that watched their nations sink under the International Jew. They likely read Henry Ford's books and thought... "Hey aren't we going through this very thing, right now?"

Were they ALL "Jew" controlled in every country and under the "Masons" or Rothschilds? No, they were simply a reaction of people to the JEW SCAMS.  

Look at the Russian White army? Jewish?  No.  Masonic? No.

Italy with Jewish Fascists? Yeah, possibly but a definite exception since Italy's problems with "Labor" were from Gramsci who was a Jew agitator. Many varieties to choose from without an artistic "Mistress" from 1911 to 1938:

There were a variety of factions within Italian Fascism on both the left and the right. The accommodation of the political right into Fascism in the early 1920s led to the creation of a number of internal factions in the Italian Fascist movement. The "Fascist left" included Angelo Oliviero Olivetti, Sergio Panunzio, and Edmondo Rossoni, who were committed to advancing national syndicalism as a replacement for parliamentary liberalism in order to modernize the economy and advance the interests of workers and the common people.[43] The "Fascist right" included members of the Fascist paramilitary "Squadristi" and former members of the right-wing Italian Nationalist Association (ANI).[43] The Squadristi were intransigent Fascists who wanted the establishment of Fascism as a complete dictatorship, while the former ANI members, including Alfredo Rocco, desired the entrenchment of an authoritarian corporatist state to replace the liberal state in Italy, while retaining existing elites.[43] There were also smaller factions within the Italian Fascist movement, such as the "clerical Fascists" who sought to shift Italian Fascism from its anti-Catholic roots to accepting Catholicism; on the far right there were "monarchist Fascists" who sought to use Fascism to create an absolute monarchy under King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy.[43]

For whatever reason, people want to push this "Hitler was a Jew", or "Hitler was under direct Jewish control", or "Hitler was a Rothschild", or "Hitler was Gay", or "Hitler was a British Agent"... they are wrong.  

Why?

They never say, "Hitler was angry and wanted revenge on people that starved Germany after WWI".  They never say, "Hitler was just a lower class German, without strong prejudices while nearly homeless as a day-laborer in Vienna, Austria."  They never say, "Hitler was baptized Catholic".
They never say, "Millions of Germans felt the same way Hitler did in the face of Jewish Bankrupt Capitalism and Jewish Bolshevism and Jewish art, and Jewish run Prostitution, and Jewish scammed Juries, and Jewish agitating Communism. They never talk about the National Socialists starting broke and unfunded -- like where was the "secret" stash of Rothschild/Allen Dulles/Emile Maurice cash for the first 12 years? It does not exist.

No. They never say this, do they?  Not even Douglas Reed. Why not? Is it a fault of the Europeans that independently took a stand against Jews ruining their respective PEOPLE.  

So does Reed point out that Hitler's chauffeur was part Jewish? Really, this fact, while interesting, indicates nothing to me. Himmler's mom had an affair with a Jew and Himmler's brother was likely half-Jewish.  Was Himmler under Jew control?  

No. Individual Germans like Rudolf Hess, who was in the Freikorps fighting Bolshevism, independently supported removing the "radical" Jews before ever meeting Hitler. Later, they would be supportive of Hitler.

The revulsion against Jew Corruption began before Hitler was even well known...when he was an obscure nobody ranting on street corners... that's what I think a few here at TIU can't clearly see.  :think:

Also, this idea of "Worship" versus "Respect" needs to be clarified for some people here at TIU. Fearful people worship, but confident people respect. Many German men with a lot to lose respected Hitler because he voiced what many of them felt after WWI. That's the plain truth.  

See I generally take most things I read and study with a grain of salt, including Hitler...but... after all these years... he comes across as genuine -- that is, a German Nationalist.  The evidence that the Nazis and Hitler was a Jewish conspiracy does not stand. Jews had reached their limit of Scams -- and the German "People" reacted.  To be honest, they are piling the Scams fast and heavy right now in many parts of the USA, Europe and the Middle East today.  At some point they are going to break the "Goyim's" back --  and a reaction against them will be provoked.  It's not like you need an old newsreel to the see that... and I'm sure Hitler didn't have to think very hard to remember the ugly Bolshevik Jews in Munich that tried set up a Soviet.

For some reason,  a few people can't give this one up.  
BTW, the "interesting pictures" don't convince me at all otherwise.

[Fester]

Well said, CSR.  I've been looking for a statement of Reed's in which he says that he started out strongly anti-Hitler/Nazi, but he was awoken to the situation when Jews were forced to identify themselves.  When he saw the their domination, he realized that it was a Jewish problem.  Was sure it was in Controversy of Zion but haven't found it.

Anyhow, Reed wrote Controversy of Zion much later than the previously cited Insanity Fair.  I'm not familiar enough with the history and am guessing that the laws forcing Jews to identify themselves came in in about 1941.  That Reed still considered the Nazi regime a stalking horse for the Commies when he wrote Somewhere South of Suez in 1949 is understandable as there is plenty of controversy on the nature/role of Hitler et al at this point as this meaty little thread proves.

Reed Works:

The Burning of the Reichstag (1934)
Insanity Fair: A European Cavalcade (Jonathan Cape, 1938)
Disgrace Abounding (do., 1939)
Fire and Bomb: A comparison between the burning of the Reichstag and the bomb explosion at Munich (do., 1940)
Nemesis? The Story of Otto Strasser (do., 1940)
History in My Time by Otto Strasser (translated from the German by Douglas Reed, (do, 1941)
A Prophet at Home (do., 1941)
All Our Tomorrows (do., 1942)
Downfall, play (do., 1942)
Lest We Regret (do., 1943)
The Next Horizon: Or, Yeomans' Progress, novel (do., 1945)
Galanty Show, novel, (do., 1947)
From Smoke to Smother (1938-1948): A Sequel to Insanity Fair (do., 1948)
Reasons of Health, novel, (do., 1949)
Somewhere South of Suez: A further survey of the grand design of the twentieth century (do., 1949)
Far and Wide (do., 1951)
The Battle for Rhodesia (HAUM, 1966)
The Siege of Southern Africa (Macmillan, Johannesburg, 1974), ISBN 0-86954-014-9
Behind the Scene (Part 2 of Far and Wide) (Dolphin Press, 1975; Noontide Press, 1976, ISBN 0-911038-41-8)
The Grand Design of the 20th Century (Dolphin Press, 1977)
Rule of Three, novel
Prisoner of Ottawa, novel
The Controversy of Zion (Veritas, 1985)[5]

Here's Chapter 36 of Controversy of Zion:
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Douglas. ... .Press.htm
Chapter 36

THE STRANGE ROLE OF THE PRESS
The years which followed, 1933-1939, were those of the brewing of the Second World War. "Prussian militarism", supposed to have been laid low in 1918, rose up more formidable than ever and the spectacle so absorbed men's minds that they lost interest in the affair in Palestine, which seemed unrelated to the great events in Europe. In fact it was to loom large among those "causes and objects" of the second war which President Wilson had called "obscure" in the first one. The gap left by the collapse, in 1917, of the legend of "Jewish persecution in Russia" was filled by "the Jewish persecution in Germany" and, just when Zionism was "helpless and hopeless", the Zionists were able with a new cry to affright the Jews and beleaguer the Western politicians. The consequences showed in the outcome of the ensuing war, when revolutionary-Zionism and revolutionary-Communism proved to be the sole beneficiaries.

My own experience during those years ultimately produced this book. When they began, in 1933, I had climbed from my clerkship to be a correspondent of The Times in Berlin and was happy in that calling. When they ended, in 1939, I was fully disenchanted with it and had felt compelled to throw up my livelihood. The tale of the years between will show the reason.

From 1927 on I reported the rise of Hitler, and by chance was passing the Reichstag when it burst into flames in 1933. This event (used to set up the secret-police-and-concentration-camp system in Germany, on the Bolshevist model) cemented Hitler in power, but some prescience, that night, told me that it meant much more than that. In fact the present unfinished ordeal of the West dates from that night, not from the later war. Its true meaning was that the area of occupation of the world-revolution spread to the middle of Europe, and the actual transfer to Communist ownership in 1945 merely confirmed an accomplished fact (theretofore disguised from the masses by the bogus antagonism between National Socialism and Communism) which the war, at its outset, was supposed to undo. The only genuine question which the future has yet to answer is whether the world-revolution will be driven back or spread further westward from the position which, in effect, it occupied on the night of February 27, 1933.

From the start of Hitler's regime (on that night) all professional observers in Berlin, diplomats and journalists, knew that it meant a new war unless this were prevented. Prevention at that time was relatively simple; Mr. Winston Churchill in his memoirs rightly called the Second War "the unnecessary war". It could have been prevented by firm Western opposition to Hitler's preliminary warlike forays (into the Rhineland, Austria and Czechoslovakia) at any time up to 1938 when (as Mr. Churchill also confirms) the German generals, about to overthrow Hitler, were themselves undone by the Western capitulation to him at Munich.

The trained observers in Berlin were agreed that he would make war if allowed and so advised their governmental or editorial superiors in London. The Chief Correspondent of The Times in Berlin, Mr. Norman Ebbutt (I was the second correspondent) reported early in 1933 that war must be expected in about five years unless it were forethwarted, and this particular report was printed. He, I and many other reporters during the following years grew alarmed and perplexed by the suppression, "burking" and ignoring of despatches, and by the depictment of Hitler, in Parliament and the newspapers, as an inherently good man who would remain peaceable if his just grievances were met (at others' expense).

This period has become known as that of "the policy of appeasement" but encouragement is the truer word, and the policy changed the probability of war into certainty. The strain brought Mr. Ebbutt to physical collapse. From 1935 on I was Chief Correspondent in Vienna, which was then but another vantage-point for surveying the German scene. From there, late in 1937, I informed The Times that both Hitler and Goering had said that the war would begin "by the autumn of 1939"; I had this information from the Austrian Chancellor. I was in Vienna during Hitler's invasion and then, after brief arrest by Storm Troops on the way out, transferred to Budapest, where I was when the supreme capitulation of Munich followed in September 1938. Realizing then that a faithful reporter could do nothing against "the policy of appeasement", and that his task was meaningless, I resigned by expostulant letter, and still have the editor's discursive acknowledgement.

Fourteen years later The Times publicly confessed error, in respect of its "policy of appeasement", in that curiously candid Official History of 1952. This contains a grudging reference to me: "There were resignations from junior members of the staff" (I was forty-three in 1938, was Chief Correspondent for Central Europe and the Balkans, had worked for The Times for seventeen years, and I believe I was the only correspondent to resign). In this volume The Times also undertook never so to err again: "it is not rash to say that aggression will never again be met at Printing House Square in terms of mere 'Munich'." The editorial articles and reports of The Times about such later events as the bisection of Europe in 1945, the Communization of China, the Zionization of Palestine and the Korean war seem to me to show that its policies did not change at all.

Thus my resignation of 1938 was inspired by a motive similar to that of Colonel Repington (of whom I then had not heard) in 1918. There was a major military danger to England and qualified reporters were not allowed to make this plain to the public: the result, in my opinion, was the Second World War. The journalist should not regard himself too seriously, but if his reports are disregarded in the most momentous matters of the day he feels that his calling is a sham and then he had best give it up, at any cost. This is what I did, and I was comforted, many years later, when I read Sir William Robertson's words to Colonel Repington: "The great thing is to keep on a straight course and then one may be sure that good will eventually come of what may now seem to be evil".

When I resigned in 1938 I had a second reason, not present in 1933, for perplexity about the way the press is conducted. In that matter, too, I could only assume that some infatuation worked to distort the truthful picture of events. The outcome of the ensuing war, however, showed that a powerful motive had lain behind this particular misrepresentation.

In the case of "the Jewish persecution" in Germany I found that impartial presentation of the facts gradually gave way to so partisan a depictment that the truth was lost. This transformation was effected in three subtle stages. First the persecution of "political opponents and Jews" was reported; then this was imperceptibly amended to "Jews and political opponents"; and at the end the press in general spoke only of "the persecution of Jews". By this means a false image was projected on to the public mind and the plight of the overwhelming majority of the victims, by this fixing of the spotlight on one group, was lost to sight. The result showed in 1945, when, on the one hand, the persecution of Jews was made the subject of a formal indictment at Nuremberg, and on the other hand half of Europe and all the people in it were abandoned to the selfsame persecution, in which the Jews had shared in their small proportion to populations everywhere.

At that period I, typical of Englishmen of my generation, had never thought of Jews as different from myself, nor could I have said what might make a Jew, in his opinion, different from me. If I later became aware of any differentiation, or of the desire of a powerful group to assert one, this was not the result of Hitler's deeds but of the new impediment to impartial reporting which I then began to observe. When the general persecution began I reported it as I saw it. If I learned of a concentration camp containing a thousand captives I reported this; if I learned that the thousand included thirty or fifty Jews I reported that. I saw the first terror, spoke with many of the victims, examined their injuries, and was warned that I incurred Gestapo hostility thereby. The victims were in the great majority, certainly much over ninety percent, Germans, and a few were Jews. This reflected the population-ratio, in Germany and later in the countries overrun by Hitler. But the manner of reporting in the world's press in time blocked-out the great suffering mass, leaving only the case of the Jews.

I illustrate this by episodes and passages from my own experience and reporting. Rabbi Stephen Wise, writing in 1949, gave the following version of events personally reported by me in 1933, and undoubtedly purveyed the same version in the presidential circle of which he was a familiar during those years: "The measures against the Jews continued to outstrip in systematic cruelty and planned destruction the terror against other groups. On January 29, 1933 Hitler was summoned to be chancellor . . . at once the reign of terror began with beatings and imprisonment of Jews. . . We planned a protest march in New York on May 10, the day of the ordered burning of Jewish books in Germany . . . the brunt of the attack was borne by Jews. . . concentration camps were established and filled with Jews".

All these statements are false. The measures against the Jews did not outstrip the terror against other groups; the Jews were involved in a much larger number of others. The reign of terror did not begin on January 29, 1933, but in the night of the Reichstag fire, February 27. No "burning of Jewish books" was ordered; I attended and reported that bonfire and have looked up my report published in The Times, to verify my recollection. A mass of "Marxist" books was burned, including the works of many German, English and other non-Jewish writers (my books, had they then been published, would undoubtedly have been among them); the bonfire included some Jewish books. the "brunt" of the terror was not borne by Jews, nor were the concentration camps "filled with Jews". The number of Jewish victims was in proportion to their ratio of the population.

Nevertheless this false picture, by iteration, came to dominate the public mind during the Second War. At the time of my resignation, which was provoked solely by the "policy of appeasement" and the imminent advent of "the unnecessary war", this other hindrance to faithful reporting was but a secondary, minor annoyance. Later I discerned that the motive behind it was of major importance in shaping the course and outcome of the Second War". When I came to study the story of Mr. Robert Wilton I perceived that there was also a strong resemblance between my experience and his. He sought to explain the nature of an event in Russia and thus was inevitably led into "the Jewish question". Twenty years later I observed that it was in fact impossible to draw public attention to the misreporting of the nature of the persecution of Germany and to explain that the Jews formed only a small fraction of the victims.

That matter had nothing to do with my resignation, but I was becoming aware of it around that time, and this widening perception is reflected in the two books which I published after renouncing journalism. The first, Insanity Fair, was devoted entirely to the menace of war. I thought, somewhat vaingloriously, that one voice might still avert it, and today's reader may still verify that motive. To account for this excess of zeal in me, the indulgent reader, if he be old enough, might recall the feeling of horror which the thought of another world war caused in those who had known the first one. This feeling can never be fully comprehended by those of later generations, who have become familiar with the thought of a series of wars, but it was overpowering at the time.

The second book, Disgrace Abounding, on the eve of war continued the warning theme, but in it, for the first time, I gave some attention to "the Jewish question". My experience was widening and I had begun to discern the major part it would play in forming the shape and issue of the Second War which then was clearly at hand. My thought from then on was much given to it; in this way I came in time to write the present book and in that light the remaining chapters on the brewing, course and aftermath of the Second War, are written.

 
Here's an excerpt from chapter 37 of The Controversy of Zion
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Douglas. ... Masses.htm.  Not all on topic but of interest perhaps.  Nai stuff is at the end.  Cursor is hyperactive which makes seletion and highlighting problematic.

"Whenever the quantity of Jews in any country reaches the saturation point, that country reacts against them. . . England had reached the point where she could or would absorb so many Jews and no more. . . The reaction against this cannot be looked upon as anti-semitism in the ordinary or vulgar sense of that word; it is a universal social and economic concomitant of Jewish immigration and we cannot shake it off. Sir William had no particular anti-Jewish prejudice. He acted . . . in the most kindly way, in the interests of his country. . . In his opinion it was physically impossible for England to make good the wrongs which Russia had inflicted on its Jewish population . . . .I am fairly sure he would equally have opposed mass influx of any foreign element; but, as it happened, no other  foreign element pressed for admission in such numbers". (Forty years later Dr. Weizmann spoke similarly to Jews in America: "Certain countries can digest a certain number of Jews; once that number has been passed, something drastic must happen; the Jews must go").

Dr. Weizmann thus soberly presented the valid argument against unrestricted Jewish immigration only because he was speaking chiefly to Jews and was drumming into them the Talmudic argument that Jews cannot be assimilated; this argument is essential to Zionism, but is not inherently true. The quoted passages show that in 1906 a man in authority was still able to state that his country could not make good "wrongs" supposed to have been inflicted on Jews in another country, and to let "the interests of his country" govern his duty. In the ensuing decades all the premier-dictators of the West made it State policy to remedy alleged wrongs, done by a third party, at the expense of an innocent fourth party. The absurdity is shown by Dr. Weizmann's own last-quoted remark, that when the number of digestible Jews is exceeded in any country "something drastic must happen; the Jews must go". He and his associates for half a century had been using all their power in America to gain unrestricted access for Jews, so that, according to his own words, they were deliberately leading the Jews there to disaster; the time must come, if what he said was true, when governments elsewhere in the world will be under pressure to admit large numbers of Jews from America because of "the wrongs" done them there.

Such was the background of the dominant issue in American life when Mr. Roosevelt became president. Between 1881 and 1920 over three million legally-recorded immigrants entered the United States from Russia, most of them Jews. According to the United States Census Bureau the country contained 230,000 Jews in 1877 and about 4,500,000 in 1926. Only "estimates" are at any time obtainable in matters of Jewish population, as the "elders" oppose head-counting by others, and these figures are generally held to have been largely under-estimated. In the ensuing decade the figures eluded all verification, chiefly owing to changes in immigrant-classification ordered by President Roosevelt, and even the competent authorities will not attempt to estimate the extent of unrecorded and illegal immigration (competent observers judge that the total number of Jews in the United States now may be around ten million). In any case, the greatest single community of Jews in the world today is in the American Republic, having been transplanted thither during the last two generations.

In proportion to the total American population even the highest estimate would not reach one-tenth. In itself this is a relatively small group; politically organized to tip the balance of power it is of decisive importance. This problem was recognized and the Congressional Committee on Immigration in 1921 declared:

"The processes of assimilation and amalgamation are slow and difficult. With the population of the broken parts of Europe headed this way in ever-increasing numbers, why not peremptorily check the stream with this temporary measure, and in the meantime try the unique and novel experiment of enforcing all the immigration laws on our statutes?"

A quota law then passed limited the number of any nationality entering the United States to three percent of the foreign-born of that nationality resident in the United States in 1910. The next Congress went much further than the general statement above quoted; it was specific about the danger, the same Committee reporting:

"If the principle of individual liberty, guarded by a constitutional government, created on this continent nearly a century and half ago is to endure, the basic strain of our population must be maintained and our economic standards preserved. . . The American people do not concede the right of any foreign group . . . to dictate the character of our legislation".

The years which then followed showed that the effect of Mr. Roosevelt's presidency would be further to break down the principle stated, to alter "the basic strain", and to enable "a foreign group" to dictate State policy.

Mr. Roosevelt (like Mr. Wilson, Mr. Lloyd George and General Smuts) evidently was selected before he was elected. Mr. Howden says that Mr. House "picked Roosevelt as a natural candidate for the presidency long before any other responsible politician", chose him as Assistant Secretary of the Navy in 1913, and then through the years groomed him for the presidency, expecting to govern through him, as through President Wilson. Then something went wrong. Mr. House was confident that President Roosevelt would call on him but then realized that "certain people don't want the president to listen to me". These people were evidently too strong, for Mr. House was dropped without any courtesy and at this point (1933) disappears from the story.

One can only offer a reasonable surmise about the reasons. Mr. House, at seventy-five, regretted young Philip Dru of 1912, who had thought the American Constitution "outmoded and grotesque", had seized power by force and then governed by emergency decree. He had a new set of more sober and responsible ideas ready for Mr. Roosevelt and, from relegation, then "watched with forbidding" the concentration of irresponsible power in Mr. Roosevelt's hands. Mr. House had caused President Wilson, as his first major act, to write into the American Constitution (as the Sixteenth Amendment) the chief destructive measure proposed in Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto of 1848, the "progressive income tax", but in the 1930's Mr. House was alarmed by the completely untrammelled control of the public purse which his second "Rockland" obtained.

Presumably, then, Mr. House was discarded because he had retreated from his earlier ideas, for those original ideas governed Mr. Roosevelt's policy throughout his twelve years. He supported the world-revolution; his first major act of State policy was to recognize the Communist Government and in the ensuing war he resumed the House-Wilson policy of "all support". He supported revolutionary-Zionism. Finally, he took up the old "league to enforce peace" idea and re-foisted it on the West under a new name, that of the "United Nations".

Thus Mr. Roosevelt put "Philip Dru's" ideas into further practice. Of Mr. Wilson in the earlier generation his Secretary of the Interior, Mr. Franklin K. Lane, had said, "All Philip Dru had said should be comes about; the President comes to Philip Dru in the end". As to Mr. Roosevelt, twenty years later, Mr. House's biographer (Mr. Howden) says, "It is impossible to compare Dru's suggested legislation with Mr. Roosevelt's and not be impressed by their similarity" .

This is an illustrative example of the transmission of ideas from generation to generation, among a governing group. Mr. House's ideas were those of "the revolutionaries of 1848", which in turn derived from Weishaupt and the revolutionaries of 1789, who had them from some earlier source. When Mr. House abandoned them they were transmitted without a hitch to the ruling group around another president, and the one man who had modified these ideas was left behind.

Mr. House was the only casualty in the inner circle. Mr. Bernard Baruch was adviser to Mr. Roosevelt even before he became president. Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt records that "Mr. Baruch was a trusted adviser to my husband both in Albany and in Washington", that is, during Mr. Roosevelt's four-year term as Governor of New York State, before his presidential nomination. During this pre-presidential period Mr. Roosevelt (according to one of Mr. Baruch's biographers, Mr. Morris V. Rosenbloom), although America had repudiated the League of Nations, drafted the plan for a new body to be called the United Nations. Rabbi Stephen Wise and Mr. Brandeis, of the earlier group around President Wilson, regrouped themselves around President Roosevelt (Hitler's anti-Jewish measures in Germany at this time revived Mr. Brandeis's desire to drive Arabs out of Palestine).

Right at the start of Mr. Roosevelt's twelve years some doubt may have arisen about his docility, and means have been found to ensure it (the reader will recall "Rockland's" attempt to assert independence in 1912 and the "exultant conspirators" mirth about his capitulation). That would explain the curious fact that Rabbi Stephen Wise, who had campaigned for Mr. Roosevelt as senator in 1914 and as governor of New York State in 1928, did not support him for the presidency in 1932. Then something happened to reassure the rabbi, for immediately after Mr. Roosevelt's election he proclaimed that the new president had "rewon my unstinted admiration", and by 1935 was again an intimate of the White House.

In the light of earlier experience, the identity of the men surrounding President Roosevelt plainly pointed to the policies he would pursue. He made this clearer by widening the circle of his Jewish advisers. In 1933 this had a new significance. In 1913 President Wilson's Jewish advisers were publicly accepted as Americans like any other Americans, and simply of the Jewish faith. In 1933 the question of their allegiance had been raised by the Zionist adventure in Palestine. In addition, the issues of the world-revolution and of world-government had arisen since 1913, and both of these also threw up the question of American national interest, so that the feelings entertained about them in the president's immediate circle became a matter of first importance.

All this lent a specific significance to the earlier Congressional pronouncement (1924), denying the right of "any foreign group" to "dictate the character of our legislation". Among the president's "advisers" many were of foreign birth or in effect became "foreign" by their devotion to Zionism or their attitude towards the world-revolution and world-government. In this sense a "foreign group", embodying the mass-immigration of the preceding hundred years, formed itself around the American president and "steered" the course of events. The twelve years which followed showed that any "advice" acted on by the president must have been to the benefit of the destructive principle in its three interrelated forms: Communism, Zionism, world-government.

Prominent among his advisers (in addition to the three powerful men above named) was the Viennese-born Professor Felix Frankfurter. Mr. House's biographer Mr. Howden, who expresses Mr. House's opinion, thinks he was the most powerful of all: "Professor Frankfurter duplicated with Mr. Roosevelt, more than anyone else. . . the part played by Mr. House with President Wilson". The part played by unofficial advisers is always difficult to determine and this opinion may place Professor Frankfurter too high in the hierarchy. However, he was undoubtedly important (he, too, first came into the advisory circle under Mr. Wilson).

Like Mr. Brandeis and Mr. Cardozo, he became a Supreme Court Justice and never openly appeared in American politics; yet the effects of his influence are plainer to trace than those of other men, which have to be deeply delved for. He was head of the Harvard Law School during the 1930's and in that capacity trained an entire generation of young men who were to give a definite shape to the events of the 1940's and 1950's. They received marked preference for high employment in their later careers.

They include in particular Mr. Alger Hiss, who by trial and conviction was revealed as a Communist agent, though he was a high "adviser" of President Roosevelt, (Mr. Justice Frankfurter voluntarily appeared at the trial to testify to Mr. Hiss's character), and Mr. Dean Acheson, who as American Secretary of State at that time declared he would not "turn his back" on Mr. Hiss, and others. Mr. Hiss played an important part at the Yalta Conference, where the abandonment of half Europe to the revolution was agreed; Mr. Acheson's period of office coincided with the abandonment of China to the revolution.

Apart from this distinct group of young men apparently trained during President Roosevelt's early years in office to take over the State Department, the president was accompanied by a group of Jewish advisers at the highest level. Mr. Henry Morgenthau junior (a leading Zionist, whose "Morgenthau Plan" of 1944 was the original basis for the bisection of Europe in 1945) was his Secretary of the Treasury for eleven of the twelve years. Other intimate associates were Senator Herbert Lehman (another leading Zionist who took great part in promoting the "second exodus" from Europe in 1945-1946, which led to the war in Palestine), Judge Samuel Rosenmann (a resident inmate of the White House, who helped write Mr. Roosevelt's speeches), Mr. David Niles (of Russian-born parentage, and for many years "adviser on Jewish affairs" to Mr. Roosevelt and his successor), Mr. Benjamin Cohen (a drafter of the Balfour Declaration in 1917 and another important Zionist), and three Jews from Russia, Messrs. Sidney Hillman, Isador Lubin and Leo Pasvolsky.

These leading names, from the personal entourage of the president, represent only the pinnacle of an edifice that was set around all American political life. This sudden growth of Jewish influence, behind the scenes of power, obviously was not a spontaneous natural phenomenon. The selection was discriminatory; anti-Zionist, anti-revolutionary and anti-world-government Jews were excluded from it. The formation of this "palace guard" was unpopular, but unofficial advisers are difficult to attack on specific grounds and Mr. Roosevelt ignored all protests, and so escorted began his thrice-renewed presidency. Hitler simultaneously appeared as the symbol, at that moment, of the mathematically-recurrent Jewish persecution, and in the calculations of President Roosevelt's advisers took the place occupied by "the Czar" twenty years before in those of Mr. Wilson's.

Mr. Roosevelt's long continuance in office was chiefly due to Mr. House's master-plan for winning elections. Under this strategy of the intensive appeal to the "fluctuating" vote "discrimination" became the chief slogan. It was raised on behalf of the Negroes, who were used as a stalking-horse*; and in fact was used to crush objection to the excessive influence of the "foreign group" represented by "the palace guard". Coupled with it was the appeal to the poor in the form of promises to soak the rich. This strategy proved so effective that the Republicans beat a retreat and began to compete with the Democrats for the favour of "the foreign group", who were held to be the arbiters of elections. In this way the secret grip on power was made secure, and the American elector was in fact deprived of true choice between parties. Mr. Roosevelt fortified himself by his policy of "deficit-spending", the basic theory of which was that the amount of public debt was unimportant, as the State only owed it to itself. At that point the American people lost and have never since regained control of the public purse, and the occupant of the White House became able by a stroke of the pen to command expenditures which in earlier times would have covered the annual

* See footnote on page 318

318

budgets of half-a-dozen thrifty States. Mr. Roosevelt gained these powers by invoking the need to beat "The Crisis", and he produced The Permanent Emergency in which his country still lives.

His presidency followed a design obviously predetermined and the course of events in the world might have been entirely different if it had been shorter. However, the hidden mechanism was so efficient, and the hold of his mentors on it so secure, that he was maintained in office through three re-elections. Only once was his tenure threatened with unexpected interruption, dangerous to these plans.

In a Southern State, Louisiana, arose a politico of Mr. Roosevelt's type. Mr. Huey Long, a young demagogue with a fleshy face and curly hair from a poor hillbilly home, grew popular (like Mr. Wilson and Mr. Roosevelt) by attacking "the interests" (in his particular countryside, the oil interests in general and Standard Oil in particular). The idol of the poor whites, he was elected governor in 1928 and at once tried to raise money for building schoolhouses by putting a tax on oil, whereon at the opening of the Louisiana Legislature one Rabbi Walter Peiser refused to invoke a blessing, calling him "an unworthy governor".

Mr. Long grew more popular and was elected to the United States Senate where (March 1935) he devoted "a large part" of a speech to "an attack on Mr. Bernard Baruch", in whom he apparently saw the supreme representative of the "interests" (about the only charge never made against Mr. Long, who had many Jewish associates, was that he was "anti-semitic"). Mr. Long was becoming a force in the land and wrote a book called My First Week in the White House, containing illustrations which showed Mr. Roosevelt, looking much like the Roosevelt of Yalta, listening humbly to the wisdom of a hale and ebullient Huey Long.

He set out to undo Mr. Roosevelt by outdoing him in Mr. Roosevelt's especial

* The agitation about the lot of the American Negro, of which so much is heard in the outer world, is kept going, from New York, almost entirely by the two chief Jewish publicity organizations (the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League, both of which dispose of large funds) and the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People, which from its inception has been largely Jewish-directed. The Negro himself plays a passive part in it. His wish is for better opportunities of advancement alongside the white population; he does not desire to interbreed. The energy of the Jewish organizations which claim to intercede in his cause is entirely directed towards a compulsory intermingling which neither race desires. Thus the influence of these non-Negro groups was the chief one behind the litigation leading to the Supreme Court ruling of 1955, which held the existing separate-school system to be illegal and ordered its abolition and compulsory mixed-schooling (this judgment can hardly be enforced in the South without civil war and it has been followed by various violent episodes, including the use of the National Guard and of tanks to enforce mixed-schooling). I was able to see the American Jewish Committee's budget for 1953, the estimates for which were $1,753,000. This stated, in respect of the Negroes, "The status of Jews is more secure in most of the civil and political rights areas than that of some other groups, especially Negroes. But so long as a successful threat is made to the enjoyment of rights by Negroes, the rights of Jews are riskfully in balance. Accordingly, a large proportion of our work has been directed towards securing greater equalization of opportunities for such other groups, rather than for ourselves . . . An example of this is our relationship with the N.A.A.C.P., which comes to us for assistance in certain matters where we have a special competence. . . A fruitful weapon is court action. . . We participate directly in litigation . . . We have filed briefs attacking segregation. . . and have prepared briefs challenging discrimination against Negroes". The Supreme Court is composed of political appointees, not of professional jurists; this is an important factor in what might develop into a grave situation.

319

skill: lavish spending and lavish promises. He did this in an ingenious way (he was possibly trickier than even Mr. Roosevelt). Mr. Long, with his "Share the Wealth" and "Every Man a King" programme, controlled the political machine in Louisiana. When the Roosevelt money began to flow into the States (for expenditure on all manner of crisis "projects", and incidentally on votes) Mr. Long calmly diverted it to his own similar ends. He forced through the Louisiana Legislature a law prohibiting local authorities from receiving any Washington money without the consent of a Louisiana State Board. As he controlled this board, he intercepted the cornucopian stream and the money was spent to enhance his, not Mr. Roosevelt's voting strength. He did with public money what Mr. Roosevelt was doing, but for his own political account.

In 1935 Mr. Roosevelt's second election campaign loomed ahead. Suddenly his advisers became aware that Mr. Long was popular far beyond his native Louisiana; he was a national figure. The Democratic National Committee "was astonished when a secret poll revealed that Long on a third-party ticket could poll between three and four million votes and that his Share The Wealth plan had eaten deeply into the Democratic strength in the industrial and farm States" (Mr. John T. Flynn).

Therefore Mr. Long, although he could not have become president at that time, certainly could have prevented Mr. Roosevelt's re-election, and the ruling few suddenly beheld a disturber of their regime. However, as Mr. Flynn says, "Fate had gone Democratic and remained so"; on September 8, 1935 Mr. Long was shot in the Louisiana State Capitol by a young Jew, Dr. Carl Austin Weiss. The motive will never be known because Dr. Weiss, who might have explained it, was shot by Mr. Long's tardy bodyguard.*

The political effect was clear; Mr. Roosevelt's re-election was ensured. The usual suggestion of "a madman" was conveyed to the public mind and various other motives, not entailing insanity, also were suggested. No public investigation was made, as in the cases of other political assassinations of the last hundred years, in respect of which investigation was denied or curtailed. Such investigations as have been made (for instance, in the cases of President Lincoln, the Archduke Franz Ferdinand and King Alexander of Yugoslavia) have never supported the theory (always put forward) of the lonely "madman", but have revealed thorough organization with powerful support. The removal of Mr. Long determined the pattern of events for a decade, so that it was as important in its effects as the murders of more highly-placed men.

Mr. Roosevelt was re-elected in 1936. His allotted task evidently was to reinvolve his country in the "foreign entanglements" of Mr. House and Mr.

* Mr. Long had foretold his assassination in July, saying in the Senate that enemies bad planned his death with "one man, one gun, and one bullet" as the medium. He said that a dictograph, concealed in a New Orleans hotel room where his "enemies" had met, recorded this conversation. A contemporary writer who claims to have been present at the meeting, Mr. Hodding Carter, says, "The 'plotting' was limited to such hopefully expressed comments as, 'I wish somebody would kill the . . . .' ".

Wilson, and, like Mr. Wilson, he promised from election to election to keep it out of these. Meanwhile, the uproar about Hitler grew and, as I have shown, his persecution of men was subtly transformed into a "persecution of Jews". Mr. Roosevelt, just two years before the Second War, made public, through cryptic statement which to the initiated was an undertaking to involve his country in war and to wage it primarily for the cause represented by his palace guard. Mr. Wilson made his public statement, with its menace to Russia, in December 1911, about three years before the First World War; Mr. Roosevelt made his, with its menace to Germany, in October 1937, about two years before the Second World War. The two statements are implicitly identical in identifying the American cause with the Jewish cause as mis-represented by the Zionists.

Mr. Roosevelt said (October 5, 1937), "Let no one imagine that America will escape. . . that this Western hemisphere will not be attacked . . . When an epidemic of physical disease starts to spread, the community approves and joins in a quarantine of patients in order to protect the health of the community against the spread of the disaster".

The president's speech-writers on this occasion were not cryptic enough. The allusion to "joining in a quarantine" was instantly understood by the public masses also as a threat of war. This caused such consternation that Mr. Roosevelt was obliged up to the very moment, four years later, when America was actually involved in war to promise "again and again and again" that "your sons will not be sent into any foreign war". (In October 1937 he certainly knew that war was coming in the autumn of 1939; at that very moment I had informed The Times from Vienna that Hitler and Goering had said so, and the American president would not have been less accurately informed).

By 1937 the falsification of the news-picture from Germany, which was described in the last chapter, had been going on for four years. I gave several instances, and here adduce another. Rabbi Stephen Wise relates that the American Jewish Congress immediately after Hitler's advent to power started the boycott-Germany movements on the basis of "cable reports" from Germany that "a nationwide pogrom" of Jews was being "planned".* He then mentions, casually, that the "reported" pogrom "did not come off", but the boycott did. **

Starting with this imaginary pogrom in Berlin, the propagandist campaign in America formed the basis on which Mr. Roosevelt rested his "quarantine" speech. The Zionists around the president were not truly concerned about the suffering of Jews at all; on the contrary, it was necessary to their politics in America and to the entire undertaking, and they feared its alleviation. In this they continued the policy of the Talmudic revolutionaries in Czarist Russia, who went to the length of assassination to prevent the emancipation of Jews, as has been

 * The Nazis always claimed that their one-day Jewish boycott of April 1, 1933 was in reply to this provocation from New York, and Rabbi Wise's book of 1949 thus bears out their statement.

** See footnote on page 321

321

shown.

Thus Rabbi Wise records that he and his fellow Zionists were not deterred by urgent protests and appeals from the Jews in Germany to stop the boycott. The prospect of an accommodation between Hitler and the Jews of Germany, indeed, appalled them and Rabbi Wise informed his associates of his "two fears" in this respect:

". . . that our Jewish brothers in Germany might feel moved or compelled to accept a peace agreement or pact that might mean some slight amelioration or mitigation of their wrongs. . . that the Nazi regime might decide to prevent some of the evil consequences of its regime by such palliative treatment of the Jews as would disarm worldwide Jewish protest". (He describes the second possibility as the "graver" danger).

Thus they feared that "the persecution" would collapse; the words are specific. Rabbi Wise, in New York, preferred that Jews in Germany should suffer rather than this should happen: "To die at the hands of Nazism is cruel; to survive by its grace were ten thousand times worse. We will survive Nazism unless we commit the inexpiable sin of bartering or trafficking with it in order to save some Jewish victims" (1934, to the world Jewish Conference). "We reject out of hand with scorn and contempt any and every proposal which would ensure the security of some Jews through the shame of all Jews" (1936). Mr. Brandeis, in Washington, was equally resolute for martyrdom in Germany: "Any arrangement which results in making a market abroad for German goods strengthens Hitler.... ...To thus relieve Hitler's economic distress in order to save by emigration some of Germany's Jews would be .... deplorable statesmanship".*

For the Zionists in America the spectral danger of a reconciliation between

* In fact, these Zionists were quite ready to "'traffic with the Nazis" and make financial deals with them when it suited their purpose. Seven years later, when the Second War was at its climax, Rabbi Stephen Wise received an offer from "'a group of Nazi functionaries" to allow Jews to go from Poland to Hungary, against payment. Both these countries were German-occupied, so that the advantage to the Jews involved is not apparent, and Mr. Wise must have had some ulterior reason (possibly connected with the later "'exodus" to Palestine) for wishing to transfer Jews from occupied Poland to occupied Hungary in wartime when he had so fiercely opposed their liberation from Germany in peacetime'. He requested President Roosevelt to release dollars for the bribe, to be deposited to these Nazis' account in Switzerland, whereon the president "'immediately" answered, "'Why don't you go ahead and do it, Stephen!" Instructions were then given to another prominent Zionist, Mr. Henry Morgenthau at the Treasury, and despite State Department and British Foreign Office protests the money was transferred to the Geneva office of the World Jewish Congress for crediting to the Nazi leaders!


** The word "pogrom" (a Russian one meaning "'massacre") plays an especial part in this propaganda. It is applied to any kind of disturbance in which Jews are involved and has by suggestion been given this specific, though false significance, so that the casual reader might suspect a misprint if he were to read of "a pogrom of Russians" (or of Arabs). Dr. Weizmann says "'there were never any pogroms" in his native Russian countryside but uses the word continually, explaining that "'it is not necessary to live among pogroms to know that the Gentile world is poisoned". In inciting a British military governor of Palestine to harsh measures against Arabs Dr. Weizmann said he "had had some experience with the atmosphere which precedes pogroms", though by his own earlier statement he had none. He describes as a pogrom disorders in which five or six Jews were injured, and as "'Arab terrorism" the events of 1938, in which 69 British, 92 Jews and 1500 Arabs were killed. A distinguished British officer, Sir Adrian Carton de Wiart V.C., who lived in Poland between the two wars, says 'The Jewish question seemed unanswerable . . . Pogroms were rumoured to be taking place, but I considered the rumours to have been grossly exaggerated for there were no ocular proofs of the massacre of thousands of Jews".

322

Hitler and the Jews became most acute in 1938. General Smuts then sent his Defence Minister, Mr. Oswald Pirow, to Germany to ease tension in the Jewish question, if he could. The British prime minister, Mr. Neville Chamberlain, welcomed the attempt; he told Mr. Pirow that the pressure of international Jewry was one of the principal obstacles to an Anglo-German understanding and said he would be helped in resisting this pressure (Leon Pinsker's "irresistible pressure") if Hitler could be induced to moderate his spleen.

Mr. Pirow then went to Germany. He says that he made a specific proposal, that Hitler responded favourably, and that agreement was in sight.

At that very instant fate again intervened, as in the case of Mr. Huey Long, Count Stolypin, Czar Alexander II and others; whenever a chance of pacification appeared fate intervened. A young Jew shot a German diplomat, Herr von Rath, in Paris. Riots followed in Germany, synagogues were burned, and Mr. Pirow's mission abruptly ended. No investigation into the murder, or any organization that might have been behind it, was held, or if one was begun it never produced any informative result; Rabbi Wise presents the familiar picture (found also in Mr. House's novel) of the "half-crazed youth", maddened beyond endurance.

Mr. Roosevelt responded immediately: "The news of the past few days from Germany has deeply shocked public opinion in the United States. . . I myself could scarcely believe that such things could occur in a twentieth century civilization . . . I asked our Ambassador in Berlin to return at once for report and consultation" .

The words referred to the synagogue-burning. (Mr. Roosevelt did not comment on the murder) and the central sentence is demonstrably untrue, because Mr. Roosevelt, and all his contemporaries, had earlier seen the wanton destruction of religious edifices. True, they had not been synagogues, but Mr. Roosevelt had "seen" the dynamiting of Christian churches and cathedrals in Communized Russia, and on becoming president had rushed to recognize the government that did it. Moreover, when he made this declaration he had just sent a telegram cordially approving the enforced capitulation of Czechoslavakia to Hitler and in that deed had found nothing incongruous with 20th Century civilization. This was the moment when I threw up my post, feeling unable to continue in journalism at a time when untruth was master of "the news".

The United States in effect became involved in the Second War when President Roosevelt made these declarations in 1937 and 1938, not on the day of Pearl Harbour, and a straight line led from them to his later statement of July 17, 1942, when he implicitly promised vengeance on Germany solely on account of its treatment of Jews; the men who prompted him to that public threat had from the start vehemently opposed any mitigation of Jewish suffering in Germany.

The murder of von Rath in Paris was the shot of Serajevo which in effect opened the second war, as the developing fluid, time, now reveals. Unlike Mr. Wilson, Mr. Roosevelt never privately believed that he would keep his country

323

neutral; in 1938 his mentor, Mr. Bernard Baruch, declared "We are going to lick that fellow Hitler; he isn't going to get away with it" (General George C. Marshall). Unless some change occurs, and none is foreseeable yet, the American president in any third war would find himself held in the same coils as his predecessors of 1914-1918 and 1939-1945.

During these six years when "the unnecessary war" was brewed I watched the turbulent, darkening scene from Berlin and Vienna and all the great cities on which the long night was soon to fall: Prague and Budapest, Belgrade and Bucharest, Sofia and Warsaw. I saw as much as any man, I suppose, of the stoking of the furnace from which the ingot, war, was produced; and more than most, because I was not confined to any one country or faction, but had the run of them all. I knew the noise of the bravoes in the Storm Troopers' Stammkneipen, the furtive, bitter talk of their adversaries in private dwellings, and the nervous murmur of men on the run, who glanced ever over their shoulders. I saw the face of the mob, that dinosaur without a cerebral cavity, in both its moods: the inflamed one of illusory hope (in Berlin) and the hollow-cheeked, sunken-eyed one of hopeless disillusionment (in Moscow). I met fear at every level, from the street-cleaner to the head of state or of government; I saw the terror in both its headquarter cities.

I knew or met many of the men who appeared to be powerful and to uphold opposing causes, and yet by their acts all brought "the unnecessary war" nearer and nearer. I talked with Hitler, Goering and Goebbels; I lunched quietly by the Geneva lakeside with chubby Maxim Litvinoff, a typical figure of the Café des Exiles, and wondered what he knew of Russia who so little Russia knew, though he was Foreign Minister of that communized land. I saw Mussolini, and Ramsay Macdonald, one of the British prime ministers who passed shadow-like across the blind during these years. I talked for long hours with Edouard Benesh in the old castle at Prague, with Austrian chancellors and Hungarian prime ministers, with Balkan kings and politicians. I went to watch the League of Nations, with high expectations then (for I was still callow) and was repelled by the manner of its proceedings, which was without dignity, by the lobbying and canvassing behind the scenes, and by the throng of hangers-on and intriguers which enfringed it; I think few enthusiasts for the "United Nations" would be found among those who knew the League of Nations. I went to Moscow, in the journalistic bodyguard of a rising young minister named Anthony Eden, and there saw a regime which was the facsimile of the National Socialist one in Germany in every major respect save the status of the Jews, who appeared to me to be predominant in the key-positions of the Soviet state.

It was all a whirling confusion, at the centre of which was one plain fact: that Hitler would make war unless he were prevented and that this war was coming, because he would not be prevented. There was another British prime minister, Mr. Stanley Baldwin (a source of grief to the newspaper correspondents in

324

Germany) who withheld the truth of Hitler's warlike intentions from his countrymen because, as he later said, he would have "lost the election" if he had told it. If his successor, Mr. Neville Chamberlain, thought that by continuing the policy of encouragement to Hitler he could "steer" Hitler to direct his war against the Soviet (I have no proof of this, but it may have been Mr. Chamberlain's calculation) that was at least a policy, where before was no policy at all. But it was a mistaken policy, for all qualified observers in Germany foresaw that when he struck Hitler would join hands with Stalin in waging war, not wage war against him (I wrote this in my pre-war books).

When I experienced Hitler's first two invasions, of Austria and Czechoslovakia, I realized that the last hope of averting the unnecessary war was gone. I felt that I lived in a mad world and this explains the title, Insanity Fair, which I gave to the book I wrote at that time. I could see only a lunatic lack of policy then. Eighteen years later, in the light of all that has come about and been made known, the possibility that the unnecessary war was not in all quarters held to be unnecessary obviously cannot be written off.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Well said, CSR.  I've been looking for a statement of Reed's in which he says that he started out strongly anti-Hitler/Nazi, but he was awoken to the situation when Jews were forced to identify themselves.  When he saw the their domination, he realized that it was a Jewish problem.  Was sure it was in Controversy of Zion but haven't found it.

Anyhow, Reed wrote Controversy of Zion much later than the previously cited Insanity Fair.  I'm not familiar enough with the history and am guessing that the laws forcing Jews to identify themselves came in in about 1941.  That Reed still considered the Nazi regime a stalking horse for the Commies when he wrote Somewhere South of Suez in 1949 is understandable as there is plenty of controversy on the nature/role of Hitler et al at this point as this meaty little thread proves.

Reed is a typical British faggot. He writes one book critical of 'Zionism' and gets hordes of zombies like thirdeye drueling over his every word. As has been shown he was ranting about Hitler as far back as 1938 promoting war with Germany (and once he figured it out that there was a Jewish problem he slightly modifies his position to Hitler as 'controlled opposition warmongering Jew agent', pffft). Britain waged war on Germany not the other way around, and rejected no less that 5 German peace offers. and when Hess made his miraculous flight to Scotland to offer peace to King George VI, the British government declared him insane and locked him up for life in Spandau prison. yet Reed was calling Hitler the warmonger. :lol: Funny, a Brit complaining about so-called "German imperialism" (takeover of Czech/Austria) as if the British hadn't been invading and taking over countries for centuries?  :wtf: The British not only conquered countries to satisfy their own greed, but they even conquered countries (Palestine) simply to hand it over to their masters [the Jews] and attacked countries (China) to re-install Jew drug trafficking routes [Opium Wars]. British capitalists have always been loyal Jew whores, no need to take any of them seriously when they speak ill of Hitler or anything German.

[SPECTEC]

let it be known...I am Mexican American...my white brothers...you can have what you believe...I'm not here to fight you on that...if Hitler is a hero to you based on the facts that you presented...so be it...you're not an enemy...I'm here to talk about the Jew...

I must be on the wrong forum if we are here to talk about race instead of the evil that is dividing us all...it is not the muslim or the white man or the brown man...it is the one who is here to dominate us all...the pharisee..the talmudic soul...that came here from the dark side of the psyche to enslave us all...

destroy.

[Wimpy]

let it be known...I am Mexican American...my white brothers...you can have what you believe...I'm not here to fight you on that...if Hitler is a hero to you based on the facts that you presented...so be it...you're not an enemy...I'm here to talk about the Jew...

I must be on the wrong forum if we are here to talk about race instead of the evil that is dividing us all...it is not the muslim or the white man or the brown man...it is the one who is here to dominate us all...the pharisee..the talmudic soul...that came here from the dark side of the psyche to enslave us all...

destroy.

Agreed SPECTEC.  I don't think there's any racial preference here as a group but those that do bring up color or religion into the conversation often do it to illustrate the indoctrinated stereotypes.  We have all been manipulated and lied to and mostly by the Jews; well darn near entirely by the Jews and their useful minions.

[Whaler]

let it be known...I am Mexican American...my white brothers...you can have what you believe...I'm not here to fight you on that...if Hitler is a hero to you based on the facts that you presented...so be it...you're not an enemy...I'm here to talk about the Jew...

I must be on the wrong forum if we are here to talk about race instead of the evil that is dividing us all...it is not the muslim or the white man or the brown man...it is the one who is here to dominate us all...the pharisee..the talmudic soul...that came here from the dark side of the psyche to enslave us all...

destroy.

No...This forum is not racially exclusionary. In fact, the crowd here at TIU is probably the most diverse anti-zio forum on th web. Sometimes, racial disagreements occur...but not often. Most people realize that muti-cult is a Jew creation and mock it accordingly. This forum is pretty much pure play so there's not a lot of feel good talking points. I look at this place as a straight dope outlet. If I want to play it safe I can visit VT.com or other luke warm web-sites...Don't try to wake people up using the Nazi stuff...but it's important to debate and come to a reasonable conclusion...As you can see we are not there yet.

[/tab]

.
.



Theodor Herzl Quotes

Noting that anti-semite's desire to expel Jews from their nations would aid the Zionist cause.

[/size]

The anti-Semites will become our most loyal friends; the anti-Semitic nations will become our allies.

[/size]

Sourced, The Diaries of Theodore Herzl (1956)



Racist Zionist Free Mason Ben Gurion in 1948 during foundation of Israel speech without definition of borderlines, but with a Herzl photo in the background.

Noting that anti-semite's desire to expel Jews from their nations would aid the Zionist cause.

[/size]


Herzl on board the ship to Palestine, 1898

Benny Morris (the Israeli Historian), described how Herzl foresaw how anti-Semitism could be "HARNESSED" for the realization of Zionism. He stated:

    "Herzl regarded Zionism's triumph as inevitable, not only because life in Europe was ever more untenable for Jews, but also because it was in Europe's interests to rid the Jews and relieved of anti-Semitism: The European political establishment would eventually be persuaded to promote Zionism. Herzl recognized that anti-Semitism would be HARNESSED to his own--Zionist-purposes." (Righteous Victims, p. 21)




What then, if those ideas were put into action by the Sanhedrin in a Structured, United and Planned Way, how would it seem like ?

Well, as a first move, they surely had begging secretly financing the anti-Semitic movement, right ? Right.  


[youtube:1fgaspcj]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wk83EanzlhM[/youtube]1fgaspcj]

My hunch:

 The Jewish Elite just implemented/brought to Herzl/The Protocols blueprint into Action, promoted some more Chaos (WWI) and by Hitler/NaZi party on one side, "The commies" on other and "The Allies" on the third (classical basic kabbalah teachings) increased the Level of Anti semitism & War and voilá, if Hitler had not been there surely the JEWminati would have created/invented someone like him.

The International Global Jewry Elite didn't just got stronger but the incarnated dream about  their ZioN NaZion was fulfilled: IsraHell and Global Talmudic Agenda in full ubiquitous sail,



Mission Accomplished !







I think we can all agree on this:


A Simian and the Word NaZi makes a very weird combiNaZion:




.
.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

"The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races...and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel...will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition..."

– Karl Marx in a letter to Baruch Levy, Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574

-----------------

If I opposed them would I be a "Duped or Controlled Goy" like Hitler?  Or a "Resistance" to the ideas of Karl Marx, the Talmud, the Kabballah, Sabbateans,  and of course the Sanhedrin?  If Hitler was a "dupe" he set a good role model didn't he?  Why don't the Jews "Fight" the corruption? Don't worry, they never do... they just wait for their collective SCAMS to enrage the average Goyim on the street. See, they win either way but some do not.

BTW, I see most of Corporate America as basically Jew Dupes in one way or another... are they like Hitler?

viewtopic.php?f=41&t=9326&start=0

viewtopic.php?p=52515

1921 Herbert Samuel welcomes Winston Churchill to Jerusalem. Standing behind Samuel is James "Jimmy" de Rothschild, son of Baron Edmond. Samuel's oil tankers were bringing Rothschild's oil through the Suez Canal to be delivered to Churchill's newly oil-fueled Royal Navy. The creation of Israel was not founded on kindness to the Jews. At least not in the minds of the powerful men behind it.

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=12326

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

BTW, /tab...

You are beginning to post a lot like the crazy J-Triber Negentropic used to do... reminds me a lot of CJB or some other crypto... nothing personal but just keep in mind the "presentation" you are doing, IYKWIM...  :wtf:

viewtopic.php?p=46254#p46246

Remember, TIU is all about keeping the "Cards, up turned, and on the table..." we are not about half-assed impersonations and multiple log-ins. And Jew-crappy Photoshop'ing.  

Remember, this Babe Keira is watching you for any J-Scams! And she knows they SCAM...    



And finally, don't mess with German America... for when it wakes, you better pack your bags for the next Shetl...

German Majorities in Blue:

[/tab]

CSR wrote : BTW, /tab...

You are beginning to post a lot like the crazy J-Triber Negentropic used to do... reminds me a lot of CJB or some other crypto... nothing personal but just keep in mind the "presentation" you are doing, IYKWIM... :wtf:

If you ask any Admin at the TiU forum they can confirm that my IP is from Sweden and that is a unique IP number, I am not Negentropic or someone else, I am not a

J-Triber

I am /tab and always been /tab and only /tab at  this forum, my style and presentation is my own and I represent and stand for it without any problem. What do you have to say about it, my style, is kind of a paradox, when sometimes it feels like you Crackie are spamming the forum with lots and lots of endless posts. Some of those post are good but I could ask for more abstract/recapitulation/summing-up/synopsis of your post if I may ask and if you could.[/size]

Remember, TIU is all about keeping the "Cards, up turned, and on the table..." we are not about half-assed impersonations and multiple log-ins.

And Jew-crappy Photoshop'ing.

About the "Jew-crappy Photoshop'ing" i knew you don't gonna like the NaZi Ape that much, but is a good visualisation of what normal asleep people thing of those who glorifies Hitler / Nazism, that is a fact.

As I said, you must understand that TiU is not about the users but about the messages, the posts, the ideas, the debate. When You and that ape ZioN NaZi friend of yours are trying to put the STYGMA into this forum like we ALL here are in support of (National)sozialismus then you are using a Typical ZioN trick of divide and conquer because in reality many potencial readers just would feel like something repulsive and such posts act instead like a repellent to them. I recommend you and the other Supremacists post those posts somewhere else, stormfront and so on. I don't mean here that "you don't post here", at the contrary, I really enjoy many of you posts, but please, stop acting like ZioN agents, like scams. KEEP this forum open and clean because we need a lot more people from the whole world reading  and participating on the debate, is Urgent and the (Ashke)Nazi stuff don't really help us with that.

Remember, this Babe Keira is watching you for any J-Scams! And she knows they SCAM...

I don't like going to the movies anymore and I don't like the people participing in that ZioN propaganda industry, spear me the fonnie warnings that some pathetic Anorexia nervosa bitch is watching you kind of stuff please

Cards, up turned, and on the table

Always been



.
.

[mgt23]

CSR I bet you £10, you can't provide me a link to a primary source to that La Revue magazine marx/baruch levy quote bandied around so often.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

About the "Jew-crappy Photoshop'ing" i knew you don't gonna like the NaZi Ape that much, but is a good visualisation of what normal asleep people thing of those who glorifies Hitler / Nazism, that is a fact.

Are we supposed to care what "normal asleep people" think of us? Do I care if some "normal asleep people" call me crazy if I say Israel did 9/11? According to you I should shy away from saying Israel did 9/11 becuz "normal asleep people" would think badly of me. Why don't you just go and join those "normal asleep people"? I always look for historical truth in every subject, I don't give a damn what stigma the "normal sheeple" have put on it.

When You and that ape ZioN NaZi friend of yours are trying to put the STYGMA into this forum like we ALL here are in support of (National)sozialismus then you are using a Typical ZioN trick of divide and conquer because in reality many potencial readers just would feel like something repulsive and such posts act instead like a repellent to them.

I'm sorry, what's a "ZioN NaZi"?  :wtf: You're mad becuz I took a crack at Africans? The only reason I brought up race here is becuz 9 times out of 10 when a supposedly Jew-wise person is pissing and shitting on Hitler it's becuz they are not white and can't stand the idea of Whites defending their heritage. Thirdeye is obviously not white. I wouldn't hold that against him in any normal circumstance, but it is obvious that that is the main reasoning behind his Hitler bashing. What he is really doing is white-bashing.

We're not putting a stigma on this forum, we didn't even bring up this subject. CSR and I simply responded to anti-White Hitler-bashing fanatics with facts and reason and called into question their conspiracy theories, so then you call us white supremacist. How is that not just like the ADL does? If you defend any White leader whom the Jews have voraciously demonized you're auto labelled "white supremacist" (even by supposedly Jew-wise people, hmmm  :think: ). You're really not getting outside the mainstream Jewish concept of the Nazis "as satan incarnate" when you demonize them and anyone who tells the truth about that period as "white supremacist".

I recommend you and the other Supremacists post those posts somewhere else, stormfront and so on. I don't mean here that "you don't post here", at the contrary, I really enjoy many of you posts, but please, stop acting like ZioN agents, like scams. KEEP this forum open and clean because we need a lot more people from the whole world reading  and participating on the debate, is Urgent and the (Ashke)Nazi stuff don't really help us with that.

You've made more posts to "turn people off" than me or CSR combined. I'm not particularly concerned with what "turns people off". Different things turn different people off, you can't make everyone happy. If they don't want to come here becuz they see that a few of us don't buy the caricatured 100% fake Jewish version of Hitler/Nazis/Holocaust/WW2 then they can go back to watching cartoons and CNN for all I care. Maybe that's what you should do also?

[/tab]

.
.
JEWISH FINANCING OF THE NAZI PARTY

In the early 1920's and early 1930's, large amounts of money were given to the Nazi party from Jewish banks.

    *      The Bank House Mendleson & Company in Amsterdam made two transfers. One for 10 million USD and one for 15 million USD.

    *      Kuhn Loeb & Company in New York (later taken over by Jacob Schiff)

    *      J P Morgan & Company in New York

    *      Samuel & Samuel of London

    *     Royal Dutch Shell sent 10 million Guilders as late as 1937.

JEWISH-NAZI COOPERATION

Rudolf Rezso Kasztner (1906–1957)

Rudolf Kasztner was born to Jewish parents in Transylvania, a state of Austria which was transferred to Romania. Kasztner studied and became an attorney, journalist and a leader in the Zionist youth movement "Aviva Barissia" and "Ha-lhud ha-Olam."  He moved to Budapest in 1942 and joined a local Palestine Foundation Fund which was a fundraising organization of the World Zionist Organization. He also held the post of Vice chairman of the Hungarian Zionist Federation.
Kasztner was in the top management of the Zionist movement and authorized to negotiate with the German Nazis and make deals with them. He was accepted by Hitler's regime as Zionist leader representing Hungary. Early in WWII, he had open channels to Henrich Himmler (1900-1945). When Adolf Eichmann (1906-1962) traveled to Budapest in March 1944, he met with Rudolf and worked out some deals after Hungary surrendered to Germany during the war.
In the early days of Hitler's government, an arrangement had been worked out between Nazis and Zionists to transfer Jews to Palestine in exchange for payment to the German Government. Only a small number of Jews were allowed to escape. Of the 750,000 Jews in Hungary, 550,000 were sent to their deaths in German extermination camps.

Kasztner did not work alone. Joel Eugen Brand (1906-1964), a Jew from Transylvania started to work with him in 1943 in rescuing Jewish refugees. Brand received an message from Adolf Eichmann to travel to Turkey and convey the message to the Jewish Agency that Hungarian Jews would be spared and released in exchange for military supplies. A meeting took place with the Jewish agency on June 16, 1944. Brand was arrested by British security forces en route to Palestine and sent to a military detention center in Cairo, Egypt. There he was allowed to meet Moshe Sharrett (1894-1965) the head of the Secret Security Commission of the Jewish Agency and a high official in the Zionist movement.


The British Government refused to accept the German offer and the shipment of Hungarian Jews to the death camps began. However, Kasztner was able to negotiate with Neutral nations, and some trucks and other supplies were given to the Germans that resulted in 1,786 Jews being released into Switzerland. Kasztner's efforts were marginal compared to the 550,000 Hungarian Jews who died in Germany.  

Many of the Hungarian Jews were kept no more than three miles from the border with Romania and were only guarded by a small group of German soldiers since Germany was losing a lot of manpower to the losses against the Allied forces. There were also very strong underground fighters in Hungary which could have overpowered the Germany soldiers. Instead of being warned and helped to flee, Kasztner told the imprisoned Jews that there was no danger and that they should just be patient. The Jews trusted their Zionist leadership and sat like cattle outside a slaughterhouse waiting for their deaths.

Later, after WWII, Rudolf Kasztner was given a government position in Israel as member of the Mapai party. In 1953, he was accused by Malkiel Gruenwald of collaborating with the Nazis and being the direct cause of the deaths of Hungarian Jews. The Israeli government took it very seriously and tried to protect Rudolf Kasztner by ordering the Israeli attorney general to file a criminal lawsuit against Gruenwald!  On June 22, 1955, the judge found that the case against Rudolf Kasztner had merit and so the Israeli cabinet voted to order the attorney general to appeal it to a higher court. A vote of no confidence was introduced in the Israeli Parliament, and when Zionists refused to support the vote, it caused a cabinet crisis.  If the truth of the Holocaust came out, it could bring down the Zionist Movement and threaten the very existence of Israel. Most Jews didn't know that the Zionists worked with the Nazi's. If the public were informed about the truth, they would react with horror and outrage. The Supreme Court would have started its hearings in 1958, but the Zionist movement couldn't take the chance being incriminated if Kasztner testified. As a result, Kasztner was assassinated on March 3, 1957. On January 17, 1958, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the late Rudolf Kazstner.
Evidence
The story of Rudolf Kasztner and his collaboration with the Nazi's was reported in a book called "Perfidy" by an American born Jew named Ben Hecht (1894-1964).  Ben was a staunch supporter of a Jewish state in Palestine at first but in the end he became a strong anti-Zionist. His book is a well-documented expose of the Zionist movement and how the Zionist Leadership worked with the Nazis in the annihilation of their fellow Jews to create such a hostile climate in Europe that Jews had no other option but to immigrate to Palestine.

More evidence

In 1977 Rabbi Moshe Schonfeld published a book called "The Holocaust Victims." Schonfeld confirmed the writings of Ben Hecht and wrote that the Zionist leadership was concerned only in the creation of the state of Israel, not with saving Jewish lives. The book had photocopied documents supporting the charges of betrayal against the following three people:

1.      Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), a Zionist Leader and the first President of Israel.
2.      Rabbi Stephen Wise (1874-1949), a Hungarian born Jew living in the USA.
3.    Yitzhak Grunbaum (1879-1970), a Polish Jew and the chairman of Jewish Agency, a high leader in the Zionistic movement and Minister  of Interior of the first Israeli cabinet in 1948

Paul Wallenberg was the Swedish ambassador to Hungary. He arrived shortly after 438,000 Jews were deported from Hungary to their deaths in German extermination camps. He issued Swedish passports to approximately 35,000 Jews and made Adolf Eichmann furious. As the Germans would march Jews in what was known as death marches, Wallenburg and his staff would go to train stations and hand out passports to rescue the Jews from being taken.

This upset Rudolf Kasztner and his Zionist teams because the goal of the Swedish team was to transport as many Jews as possible to Sweden as soon as the war was  over. This was contrary to the goals of the Zionist leadership who were implementing Herzl's plan. Any surviving Jews were to be taken to Palestine, not Sweden. Wallenburg succeeded in bringing out more Jews than Rudolf Kazstner ever did. When the Soviet army invaded Hungary in January 1945, Wallenburg was arrested on January 17.

He was charged with espionage and murdered. Paul Wallenburg had exposed the cooperation of the Zionist leadership with the Nazis and this was a secret that could not be let out. Therefore, the Communist/Zionist leadership eliminated a noble man who had given his all to save Jewish men, women and children.
When the debate about the Nazis working with the Zionists would not go away, the Jewish Leadership decided that something must be done to put the issue to rest. If the gentile population found out about the dark shadow over the formation of Israel, it could undermine current and future support for the state of Israel that cannot exist without the billions of dollars it receives in aid every year from the United States.
Edwin Black, an American born Jewish writer and journalist was asked in 1978 to investigate and write a history of the events. With a team of more than 10 Jewish experts, the project took five years. The book was named,

"The Transfer Agreement," and it accurately points out a whole list of Jews in the Nazi leadership but the conclusion innocently states that the Zionists who negotiated the transfer agreement could not have anticipated the concentration camps and gas chambers. The book is very well researched but still doesn't tell the history of the Zionist movement and the ideology of Theodor Herzl. Most importantly, it leaves out Herzl's words that "if whole branches of Jews must be destroyed, it is worth it, as long as a Jewish state in Palestine is created."
Edwin Black's book is a great documentation, but it is sad that he and the Jewish Leadership are not willing to face the facts that the Zionist Leadership was the cause of the Holocaust.  It is even more sad to think that the Jewish people suffered tremendously during the Nazi regime caused by their own leadership. They were sacrificed for the cause of establishing a "kingdom" on earth, which has no place for the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Matthew 23:13-15) Some day in the future the Jewish people will understand that their Messiah, which their ancestors rejected, was the Son of God. (Zechariah 12:10-14)


In 1964 a book by Dietrich Bronder (German Jew) was published in Germany called, "Before Hitler came." The book tried to come to grips with why the German Jews turned on their own people and caused so much destruction of innocent people. The answer given in the book states that the driving force behind the Jewish Nazis, was the old dream to have a Messiah who could establish a world rule with the Jews in power. The same ideology as can be seen in John 6:14-15.

The most prominent Gentile and Jewish-Nazi leaders were:

    *      Adolf Hitler: half Jew

    *      Rudolf Hess: Reich Minister; half Jew

    *      Hermann Goring: Head of German Luftwaffe

    *     Gregor and Otto Strasser: brothers and leaders in Nazi party

    *     Joseph Goebbels: Propaganda Minister; Jewish

    *     Alfred Rosenberg: Editor of the official Nazi paper "Volkisher Beobachter;" Reich Minister for Eastern occupied territories; Jewish

    *     Hans Frank: legal council of the Nazi party; Jewish

    *     Heinrich Himmler: Head of Gestapo; commander of the SS; homosexual

    *     Joachim von Ribbenstrop: Foreign Minister

    *     Reinhard Heydrich: Security chief and Second in command of SS; later became the Governor of Bohemia and Moravia; homosexual; Jewish

    *     Admiral Wilhelm Canaris: Chief of German Intelligence; Jewish

    *     Abram Goldberg a.k.a. Julius Streicher: Editor of the weekly Nazi paper "Der Sturmer;" homosexual; Jewish

    *     Adolf Eichman: SS Officer; prosecutor; Jewish

    *     Robert Ley: Ministry of Labor; organized the slave labor camps

    *     Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski: SS General

    *     Odilo Globocnik: SS General

    *     Helmut Schmidt: officer in Luftwaffe

Documents supporting the "exceptions" that Hitler made for German Jews serving in the Nazi party numbered around 1,200. There were 2 Field Marshall's, 10 Generals, 14 Colonels, 30 Majors and thousands of lower ranking officers and non-commanding officers who received these exceptions.

SUMMARY

From a rational and economical point of view, it doesn't make sense that the Nazi leaders initiated the total destruction of German Jews and other Jews in Western Europe by their own accord. Historical records show that the German Jews were the most assimilated. Germany had established a friendly atmosphere for Jews since the mid 1850's which caused them to prosper greatly. They owned and operated banks, factories, and businesses throughout Germany, especially exports which was the lifeblood of the economy. German Jews posed no threat to Germany; in fact, the German economy had become very dependant on them. The German Jews saw themselves as more noble than the eastern European Jews. In the 1920's the head of the German Jewish bank in Hamburg, Paul Warburg, even advised the German Prime Minister Ebert to stop the migration of Jews from Eastern Europe.
Warburg later told a Wall Street courier that "with Jews, Hitler means the Polish Jews who polluted Germany since World War I began."

The Nazi leadership was in their late 20's to early 30's who had become disillusioned with the different administrations, having lived through WWI and seen the destruction of the German economy. They had been drawn into the occult and many members of the Nazi leadership were members of the Thule Society which had connections to American and British freemasonry. The Nazi religion was a mixture of Thule Society and the Scandinavian religion of the Nordic gods and the myth of the pure Aryan race with blond hair and blue eyes.
The young German Jews were angry with the Jews in England and the United States and blamed them for starting WWI and destroying Germany. The strong Eastern European Jews who made up the Zionist movement had a fanatical dream of establishing a new Israel.

God was not the one who created the political state of Israel in 1948; it was the work of sinful men. Most of the people in the Zionist movement were atheistic, agnostic or followers of the occult Cabala or Talmud.
Moses Hess, Theodor Herzl and other Zionist leaders never mentioned that God had spoken to them to undertake this project. Instead, they were driven by communism/socialism. What they didn't know was that the force which drove them was the Devil himself. (Revelation 13:1-2)

IS GOD THE FOUNDER OF MODERN ISRAEL?

Why Hitler and his Jewish followers decided to destroy the Jews in Europe is a mystery that won't be fully known until the Great White Throne Judgment. All that we know is that the Nazi's and the Zionists entered into an unholy alliance of death and murder which caused pain on a scale that humanity had never before experienced. Theodor Herzl's book written in 1896, "Der Judenstaat," spelled out the destruction of some Jewish communities in order to motivate other Jews to move to Palestine.
Something is wrong in the way that history has been written since 1945. The sanitized history that Hitler and his Nazi's were all stupid and didn't know what they were doing doesn't make sense! Hitler was ambitious and intelligent, he understood that killing off the German Jews and their businesses would have been a suicidal disaster for the struggling economy.

If Hitler really hated the Jews, it would have been smarter to hide his hatred and build up the military power economy first, then attack the different nations, and then afterwards, turn on the Jews. Therefore, a power much stronger than Hitler, the Zionist movement with its blue print laid out by Theodor Herzl, and forced him into the policies he made.

http://whyihateisrael.blogspot.com/2010/11/jewish-financing-of-nazi-party-must.html

[/size]

.
.